Methodology
We welcome submissions of Methodology articles on new approaches to conducting evidence synthesis in the field of dentistry and oral health.
Methodology articles should:
- Describe a completely new method of evidence synthesis, or may offer a refinement of an existing method
- Describe a demonstrable advance in the currently accepted methodologies for conducting evidence synthesis
- Focus on methodological issues that are of interest to dental and oral health professionals
- Articulate and describe the methodological innovation in a way that is accessible to dental and oral health professionals.
The method will need to have been utilised to bring new insight into conducting evidence synthesis in a dental field and ideally, but not necessarily, have been used in a way that proves its value to oral health professionals.
Specifications
- Abstract max. 300 words
- Main body of text (excluding abstract, tables/figures, and references) not to exceed 3,000 words
- Max. 5 tables or figures
- Max. 60 references
- Include 3 practice points highlighting the relevance of the main findings to dental practice
Mandatory Statements
All Methodology articles should contain the following sections, listed after the Conclusion before the References list. All sections are mandatory except for ‘Acknowledgements’ which only needs to be included if applicable.
Author contributions: The individual contributions of authors to the manuscript should be specified in this section (for example, "JS: conceptualisation and data collection"). Guidance and criteria for authorship can be found in the Editorial Policies page.
Ethics declarations: Authors must declare any competing financial and/or non-financial interests in relation to the work described. This information must be included at the submission stage and will be published as part of the paper. If the authors do not have any conflict of interest, then please write "The authors declare no conflict of interest.” See our Editorial policies for more information.
Data availability: Authors must include a data availability statement in their manuscript. This should include information on where data supporting the results reported in the article can be found including, where applicable, hyperlinks to publicly archived datasets analysed or generated during the study. If the data is not publicly available, it is sufficient to state: "The data supporting this article can be made available by the corresponding author upon request."
Funding information: Authors must declare sources of study funding including sponsorship (e.g. university, charity, commercial organisation). If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state “The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.”
Acknowledgements: These should be brief, and should include sources of material not available commercially. Preprints on recognised servers should also be included here (unless cited within the main text of your manuscript).
References
References should follow the Vancouver format and should be numbered sequentially throughout the text. All authors should be listed for papers with up to six authors; for papers with more than six authors, the first six only should be listed, followed by et al. (see examples below).
References that appear only in tables, figure legends or boxes should be included at the end of the reference list. When cited in the text, reference numbers should be superscript, not in brackets.
Only articles that have been published, or accepted by a named publication, should be in the reference list; papers in preparation and personal communications should be mentioned in the text with a list of authors as unpublished work (or initials if any of the authors are co-authors of the present contribution).
Preprints uploaded to recognised servers (for example, medRxiv, bioRxiv etc), published conference abstracts and research datasets that have been assigned a digital object identifier should be included in reference lists.
Abbreviations for titles of medical periodicals should conform to those used in the latest edition of Index Medicus. The first and last page numbers for each reference should be provided. Abstracts and letters must be identified as such. Papers in press may be included in the list of references.
Examples:
- Journal article: Field JV, Balfour-Paul A, Wright DW. Perimandibular space infections. Br Dent J 1981;150:255–258.
- Journal article (online only/ahead of print): van der Weijden FN, Hazenberg CJM, Jonkman REG, van Teeseling SRA, Ho J-PTF, Kuitert RB. Is orthognathic surgery indicated for wind instrument players? A multiple case study. Br Dent J 2022; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4292-9.
- Book: Hargreaves IA, Craig JW. The management of traumatised anterior teeth of children. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1981.
- Book chapter: Harding SR, Fryer JI. Recurrent oral ulceration in Greenland natives. In Casselli G (ed) Coeliac diseases. 3rd ed. pp 307–324. London: Stoma Press, 1982.
- Report: Committee on Mercury Hazards in Dentistry. Code of practice for dental mercury hygiene. London: Department of Health and Social Security, 1979. [Publication no. if applicable.]
- Webpage: General Dental Council. Scope of practice. 2009. Available at www.gdc-uk.org/Newsandpublications/Publications/Publications/ScopeofpracticeApril2009[1].pdf (accessed April 2022).
Figures and Tables
All figure and table legends should be brief, specific and appear on a separate manuscript page after the ‘References’ list. Where possible, large figures and tables should be included as Supplementary Information.
Figures: Figures and images should be labelled sequentially and cited in the text at least once and in the correct order (e.g. Figure 1, Figure 2 etc). Figures should not be embedded within the text but rather uploaded as separate files in TIFF, JPG or EPS formats, in either greyscale or colour. Colour figures are published free of charge. Figures should be a minimum of 6cm in width and set at a resolution of 300 pixels per inch (300 dpi). Please submit production-quality artwork with your initial online submission. If you have followed the guidelines, we will not require the artwork to be resubmitted following the peer review process/if your paper is accepted for publication (if applicable).
Tables: Tables should only be used to present essential data; they should not duplicate what is written in the text. It is imperative that any tables used are editable. Each table must be uploaded separately with a title or caption. Please make sure each table is cited within the text at least once and in the correct order (e.g. Table 1, Table 2 etc).
Any figures or tables taken from someone else's work requires permission to be obtained. Should you have any queries regarding permissions, you can contact the editorial office and we will help as much as possible. Obtaining permission also applies to quotes, adapted material and any other content taken from previously published works or unpublished but owned by a third party. The original source should be cited in the figure or table caption.
When photos of patients are used in which the patient is recognisable, written consent of the patient for publication should be obtained by the author.
Statistical guidelines
Our sister journal, the British Dental Journal, has put together some guidelines on the use of statistics in your manuscript, which also apply to Methodology articles submitted to EBD. We strongly recommend reviewing these guidelines before submission.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information is material directly relevant to the conclusion of an article that cannot be included in the Methodology article itself owing to space or format constraints. The article must be complete and self-explanatory without the Supplementary Information, which is posted on the journal's website and linked to within the article.
Authors should submit Supplementary Information files in the final format as they are not edited, typeset or changed, and will appear online exactly as submitted. When submitting Supplementary Information, authors are required to:
- Include a text summary (no more than 50 words) to describe the contents of each file.
- Identify the types of files (file formats) submitted (e.g. PDF, Excel).
Where possible, all of the supplementary files should be combined into one file.
Please note: We do not allow the resupplying of Supplementary Information files for style reasons after a paper has been exported to production, unless there is a serious error that affects the science and, if by not replacing, it would lead to a formal correction once the paper has been published. In these cases, we would make an exception and replace the file; however, there are very few instances where a Supplementary Information file would be corrected post-publication.
Language editing
As an international journal, we receive submissions from all over the world. Papers can be rejected based on the quality of the written English; therefore, if you aren't a native English speaker, we strongly encourage you to take up some of the following options:
- Ask a colleague who is a native English speaker to review your manuscript for clarity.
- Use an English language editing service to help ensure your meaning is clear, such as the Springer Nature English Language Editing service. The use of a language editing service, including the Springer Nature English Language Editing service, is at the author's own expense and in no way implies that the article will be selected for peer review or accepted by EBD.
When you've prepared your manuscript and are happy with it, make sure you check over our ‘Ethics and policies’ page before checking out the submission section for further information on how to submit.