Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Communication
  • Published:

Is ad libitum energy intake in overweight subjects reproducible in laboratory studies using the preload paradigm?

Abstract

We assessed the reproducibility of ad libitum energy intake (EI) in overweight/obese subjects. A total of six men and two women, with a body mass index 27–32 kg/m2, aged 18–45 years, not currently dieting and weight stable during the past 3 months were studied. Participants’ EI before the study was standardized. A 1047 kJ (250 kcal) liquid preload containing 40% energy from whey protein (that is, 25 g of whey protein isolate) or a non-energy control preload were consumed randomly 90 min before an ad libitum lunch meal. Participants completed visual analogue scales for subjective appetite after preloads, and reported food intake during the remainder of the day. Treatments were repeated twice to assess reproducibility of ad libitum EI. Mean ad libitum EI was 3811±979 kJ and 3334±719 kJ after control- and whey protein-containing preloads, respectively. Analysis of repeated treatments showed within-treatment mean differences (± s.d.; day 1 minus day 2) of −50±251 kJ (−12±60 kcal), within coefficient of variation (CV) of 4.5% and intraclass correlation of 0.97 for control preloads. These results were −142±544 kJ ( 34±130 kcal), within-subject CVs of 11.2% and intraclass correlations of 0.72 for whey protein-containing preloads. In conclusion, ad libitum EI in a laboratory study using the preload paradigm in overweight and obese subjects was highly reproducible.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhavan T, Luhovyy BL, Brown PH, Cho CE, Anderson GH (2010). Effect of premeal consumption of whey protein and its hydrolysate on food intake and postmeal glycemia and insulin responses in young adults. Am J Clin Nutr 91, 966–975.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arvaniti K, Richard D, Tremblay A (2000). Reproducibility of energy and macronutrient intake and related substrate oxidation rates in a buffet-type meal. Br J Nutr 83, 489–495.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellissimo N, Thomas SG, Pencharz PB, Goode RC, Anderson GH (2008). Reproducibility of short-term food intake and subjective appetite scores after a glucose preload, ventilation threshold, and body composition in boys. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 33, 326–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen J, Noakes M, Trenerry C, Clifton PM (2006). Energy intake, ghrelin, and cholecystokinin after different carbohydrate and protein preloads in overweight men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91, 1477–1483.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregersen NT, Flint A, Bitz C, Blundell JE, Raben A, Astrup A (2008). Reproducibility and power of ad libitum energy intake assessed by repeated single meals. Am J Clin Nutr 87, 1277–1281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nair NS, Brennan IM, Little TJ, Gentilcore D, Hausken T, Jones KL et al. (2009). Reproducibility of energy intake, gastric emptying, blood glucose, plasma insulin and cholecystokinin responses in healthy young males. Br J Nutr 101, 1094–1102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norton GN, Anderson AS, Hetherington MM (2006). Volume and variety: relative effects on food intake. Physiol Behav 87, 714–722.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Obarzanek E, Levitsky DA (1985). Eating in the laboratory: is it representative? Am J Clin Nutr 42, 323–328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeomans MR (2000). Rating changes over the course of meals: what do they tell us about motivation to eat? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24, 249–259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a research grant from Mars Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I A Macdonald.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lara, J., Taylor, M. & Macdonald, I. Is ad libitum energy intake in overweight subjects reproducible in laboratory studies using the preload paradigm?. Eur J Clin Nutr 64, 1028–1031 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.104

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.104

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links