Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Palaeoclimatology (Communication arising)

CO2 and the end-Triassic mass extinction

Abstract

The end of the Triassic period was marked by one of the largest and most enigmatic mass-extinction events in Earth's history1 and, with few reliable marine geochemical records, terrestrial sediments offer an important means of deciphering environmental changes at this time. Tanner et al.2 describe an isotopic study of Mesozoic fossil soils which suggests that the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide (pCO2) across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary was relatively constant (within 250 p.p.m.v.), but this is inconsistent with high-resolution evidence from the stomatal characters of fossil leaves3. Here I show that the temporal resolution of the fossil-soil samples may have been inadequate for detecting a transient rise in pCO2. I also show that the fossil-soil data are consistent with a large increase in pCO2 across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary when variations in the stable carbon isotope (denoted as δ13C) in terrestrial plant leaves are taken into account. These factors suggest that the linkage between pCO2, global warming and the end-Triassic mass extinction remains intact.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Palaeo-atmospheric p CO2 changes across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary 208 million years ago.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hallam, A. & Wignall, P. B. Mass Extinctions and their Aftermath (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tanner, L. H., Hubert, J. F., Coffey, B. P. & McInerney, D. P. Nature 411, 675–677 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McElwain, J. C., Beerling, D. J. & Woodward, F. I. Science 285, 1386–1390 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Royer, D. L., Berner, R. A. & Beerling, D. J. Earth-Sci. Rev. 54, 349–392 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cerling, T. E. Glob. Biogeochem.Cycles 6, 307–314 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ward, P. D. et al. Science 292, 1148–1151 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hesselbo, S. P. et al. Geology (in the press).

  8. Pálfy, J. et al. Geology 29, 1047–1050 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marzoli, A. et al. Science 284, 616–618 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hames, W. E., Renne, P. R. & Ruppel, C. Geology 28, 859–862 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Beerling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beerling, D. CO2 and the end-Triassic mass extinction. Nature 415, 386–387 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/415386a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/415386a

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing