



|
The double
helix 50 years Vol.
421, No. 6921 (23 January 2003). | PDF (57 K) |
 As
a prelude to the many celebrations around the world saluting the 50th anniversary
of the discovery of the DNA double helix, Nature presents a collection
of overviews that celebrate the historical, scientific and cultural impacts of
a revelatory molecular structure.
Few molecules captivate like DNA.
It enthrals scientists, inspires artists, and challenges society. It is, in every
sense, a modern icon. A defining moment for DNA research was the discovery of
its structure half a century ago. On 25 April 1953, in an article in Nature,
James Watson and Francis Crick described the entwined embrace of two strands of
deoxyribonucleic acid. In doing so, they provided the foundation for understanding
molecular damage and repair, replication and inheritance of genetic material,
and the diversity and evolution of species.
The broad influence of the double
helix is reflected in this collection of articles. Experts from a diverse range
of disciplines discuss the impact of the discovery on biology, culture, and applications
ranging from medicine to nanotechnology. To help the reader fully appreciate how
far the double helix has travelled, we also include the original landmark paper
by Watson and Crick and the two accompanying papers by Maurice Wilkins, who shared
the Nobel Prize with Watson and Crick in 1962, and by co-discoverer Rosalind Franklin,
and their co-authors (pages 397401). We are pleased to acknowledge the financial
support of Roche in producing this collection of articles. Transforming
science Given the immense significance of the double helix, it is difficult
to imagine a world that wasn't transfixed by its discovery. Yet, as Robert Olby
recalls on page
402, the proposed structure initially received a lukewarm reception. Maclyn
McCarty, who, together with Oswald Avery and Colin MacLeod, had previously showed
DNA to be the substance of inheritance, shares his personal perspective (page
406). In science, where a lifetime's work can often be encapsulated
in a few shining moments, the greatest controversies are sometimes over the sharing
of credit. The discovery of the double helix is no exception. The premature death
and posthumous treatment of Rosalind Franklin, whose X-ray images of DNA crystals
revealed telltale clues of a double helical structure, propelled her portrayal
as a feminist icon. But, as discussed here by her biographer Brenda Maddox (page
407), Franklin is better remembered as a committed and exacting scientist
who saw no boundaries between everyday life and science. Most of our readers
will have grown up with the double helix, and yet it is still startling to consider
how quickly DNA biology has progressed in just a lifetime. Bruce Alberts reviews
how the elegant pairing of the two strands of the double helix revealed the mechanism
for replicating the essential units of inheritance (page
431). Errol Friedberg considers the vulnerability of the DNA molecule to damage
and the multitude of ways in which cells repair the damage (page
436). And Gary Felsenfeld and Mark Groudine describe how the gargantuan DNA
molecule is packaged inside the minuscule cells of the body, and how an additional
layer of information is encrypted within the proteins intimately associated with
DNA (page
448). It is perhaps salutary also to recognize what is still to be learnt
about the physiological states in which DNA exists, as discussed by Philip Ball
(page
421). As reviewed by Leroy Hood and David Galas (page
444), DNA science generated the tools that spawned the biotechnology revolution.
It enabled the cloning of individual genes, the sequencing of whole genomes and,
with the application of computer science, transformed the nature and interactions
of molecules into an information science. Carlos Bustamante and co-authors consider
how we are still learning much about the distinct structural and physical properties
of the molecule (page
423). And according to Nadrian Seeman, DNA may develop new applications as
a material for nanoscale engineering (page
427). Influencing society Beyond scientific and technological
forums, the double helix has imprinted on society's views of history, medicine
and art. As discussed by Svante Pääbo (page
409), the records of evolution have been recalibrated with information traced
through DNA sequence. On page
412, Aravinda Chakravarti and Peter Little revisit the 'nature versus nurture'
debate and our developing view of the interplay between genetic and environmental
factors in human disease. And DNA science will transform clinical medicine according
to John Bell (page
414), providing a new taxonomy for human disease and triggering a change to
health care practice. On page
440, Gustav Nossal reviews how an understanding of DNA processes, such as
recombination, have transformed the field of immunology. As a visual icon,
and as a profound influence on our nature, the DNA molecule has permeated the
imagery and art of our time, and is described by Martin Kemp (page
416) as the Mona Lisa of this scientific age. Given that broad impact,
and revolutions that are yet to come, it is perhaps appropriate to leave the last
word to an artist. Written in 1917, the poem Heredity by Thomas Hardy seems
to foreshadow both the essence and the fascination of the molecule that we celebrate
here. Heredity I am the family face; Flesh perishes,
I live on, Projecting trait and trace Through time to times anon, And
leaping from place to place Over oblivion. The years-heired feature
that can In curve and voice and eye Despise the human span Of durance
that is I; The eternal thing in man, That heeds no call to die. Thomas
Hardy (First published in Moments of Vision and Miscellaneous Verses,
Macmillan, 1917) CARINA DENNIS AND PHILIP CAMPBELL
 |
A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid J.D.
WATSON & F.H.C. CRICK Nature 171, 737-738; 1953
| 397 |  |
 |
Molecular structure of deoxypentose nucleic acids M.H.F.
WILKINS, A.R. STOKES & H.R. WILSON Nature 171, 738-740;
1953 | 398 |  |
 |
Molecular
configuration in sodium thymonucleate ROSALIND E. FRANKLIN &
R.G. GOSLING Nature 171, 740-741; 1953 | 400 |  |
 |
 |
Quiet
debut for the double helix ROBERT OLBY doi:10.1038/nature01397
| 402 |  |
 |
Discovering
genes are made of DNA MACLYN MCCARTY doi:10.1038/nature01398
| 406 |  |
 |
The
double helix and the 'wronged heroine' BRENDA MADDOX doi:10.1038/nature01399
| 407 |  |
 |
The
mosaic that is our genome SVANTE PÄÄBO doi:10.1038/nature01400
| 409 |  |
 |
Nature,
nurture and human disease ARAVINDA CHAKRAVARTI AND PETER LITTLE doi:10.1038/nature01401
| 412 |  |
 |
The
double helix in clinical practice JOHN I. BELL doi:10.1038/nature01402
| 414 |  |
 |
The
Mona Lisa of modern science MARTIN KEMP doi:10.1038/nature01403
| 416 |  |
 |
Portrait
of a molecule PHILIP BALL doi:10.1038/nature01404
| 421 |  |
 |
Ten
years of tension: single-molecule DNA mechanics ARLOS BUSTAMANTE,
ZEV BRYANT & STEVEN B. SMITH doi:10.1038/nature01405 | 423 |  |
 |
DNA
in a material world NADRIAN C. SEEMAN doi:10.1038/nature01406
| 427 |  |
 |
DNA
replication and recombination BRUCE ALBERTS doi:10.1038/nature01407
| 431 |  |
 |
DNA
damage and repair ERROL C. FRIEDBERG doi:10.1038/nature01408
| 436 |  |
 |
The
double helix and immunology GUSTAV J. V. NOSSAL doi:10.1038/nature01409
| 440 |  |
 |
The
digital code of DNA LEROY HOOD AND DAVID GALAS doi:10.1038/nature01410
| 444 |  |
 |
Controlling
the double helix GARY FELSENFELD AND MARK GROUDINE doi:10.1038/nature01411
| 448 |  |
|