10th Anniversary
The promise and peril of chemical probes - pp536 - 541
Cheryl H Arrowsmith, James E Audia, Christopher Austin, Jonathan Baell, Jonathan Bennett, Julian Blagg, Chas Bountra, Paul E Brennan, Peter J Brown, Mark E Bunnage, Carolyn Buser-Doepner, Robert M Campbell, Adrian J Carter, Philip Cohen, Robert A Copeland, Ben Cravatt, Jayme L Dahlin, Dashyant Dhanak, Aled M Edwards, Mathias Frederiksen, Stephen V Frye, Nathanael Gray, Charles E Grimshaw, David Hepworth, Trevor Howe, Kilian V M Huber, Jian Jin, Stefan Knapp, Joanne D Kotz, Ryan G Kruger, Derek Lowe, Mary M Mader, Brian Marsden, Anke Mueller-Fahrnow, Susanne Müller, Ronan C O'Hagan, John P Overington, Dafydd R Owen, Saul H Rosenberg, Brian Roth, Ruth Ross, Matthieu Schapira, Stuart L Schreiber, Brian Shoichet, Michael Sundström, Giulio Superti-Furga, Jack Taunton, Leticia Toledo-Sherman, Chris Walpole, Michael A Walters, Timothy M Willson, Paul Workman, Robert N Young & William J Zuercher
doi:10.1038/nchembio.1867
Chemical probes are powerful reagents with increasing impacts on biomedical research. However, probes of poor quality or that are used incorrectly generate misleading results. To help address these shortcomings, we will create a community-driven wiki resource to improve quality and convey current best practice.
Full Text - The promise and peril of chemical probes | PDF (736 KB) - The promise and peril of chemical probes