Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.
Transdisciplinary approaches to knowledge production and problem solving to tackle grand societal challenges
Submission status
Open
Submission deadline
Transdisciplinarity is driven by the need to solve complex real-world problems. It is characterised by the transgression of disciplinary and sectorial boundaries, common goal setting and the creation of a higher-level synthesis or convergence of knowledge. It shares common features with its sister concept, interdisciplinary, yet differs in that it additionally places emphasis on the participation of non-academic actors and practitioners in the process of knowledge production and problem solving. In broad terms, transdisciplinary approaches are often characterised as being: interdisciplinary, collaborative beyond traditional academia, integrative, reflexive, problem-focused or purpose-oriented, participatory and interactive.
This collection focuses on transdisciplinarity in policymaking and research practice, particularly as applied to efforts to find solutions to societal and global challenges.
Perspectives are welcomed on a range of themes, including but not limited to:
Philosophies and theories underpinning transdisciplinarity
Conceptual and methodological approaches to transdisciplinary research
Transdisciplinary research models (e.g., training, teaching and participatory projects)
The role of transdisciplinarity in the policymaking process from conception to implementation
Case studies of successful, innovative and landmark transdisciplinary projects
Transdisciplinary research in the context of societal power relations and institutional structures
Approaches to the integration of the values, knowledge, know-how and expertise of non-academic stakeholders in collaborative research
Relationship of transdisciplinarity to related concepts (e.g., interdisciplinarity, co-production, and integration and implementation sciences)
Limitations of and blockers (e.g., structural, disciplinary) to the adoption of transdisciplinary approaches
Note: Research papers that do not explicitly relate to ‘transdisciplinarity’ will not be considered for this collection, but will be processed, if otherwise appropriate, for potential publication in the general section of the journal.
This commentary reflects upon the progress, limitations, and some of the pitfalls of one UK London-based HE institution’s development of a trans-disciplinary arts and sciences undergraduate degree programme specifically designed to build knowledge and confidence in students to both reflect upon and effectively respond in constructive and just ways to some of the ‘global challenges’ facing society. It does not challenge the importance and necessity of specialist expertise but sees the potential of a trans-disciplinary approach to education as not just complementary but increasingly valuable to a wider range of graduates. Graduates needed to lead systems change and facilitate wider appreciation and practical understanding of multidimensional problem-solving, the importance of stakeholder engagement and more holistic systems thinking, something that should not be limited to those who have the opportunity and means to study Masters or PhD degrees. As one of a few UK universities that offer inter-disciplinary or trans-disciplinary undergraduate degrees and with some added insights from a former colleague who now works on University College London’s (UCL) interdisciplinary BASc, we offer the following suggestions and advice for those interested in working towards developing trans-disciplinary provision. This includes the development of a financial model that allows students and staff to work between departments or faculties; an administrative structure that promotes communication and information sharing between different departments without compromising the requirements of data protection; the buy-in and support of senior leaders who both understand and can advocate for the benefits of a trans-disciplinary approach and explicit university-wide recognition of the staff who work on such programmes in terms of career progression and support for the trans-disciplinary research they undertake.