Collection 

Philosophy [in:of:for:and] digital knowledge infrastructures

Submission status
Open
Submission deadline

When it comes to the digitalisation of research and higher education, one can observe impressive developments in almost all disciplines in the humanities. In fact, digital humanities has become an overarching umbrella term for a wide variety of projects from the arts and humanities using digital knowledge infrastructures, regardless of whether it is used to store and structure vast amounts of data for easy access or to provide novel, interactive user interfaces for accessing field-specific information. 

Regarding philosophy, however, there appears to be a striking under representation in the digital humanities sector so far. While there is some research done about philosophical aspects of digitalisation and even about methodological advantages of digital technology for philosophy, it is still rare in comparison with similar research in other disciplines.
This Collection aims to publish new philosophical views on digital knowledge infrastructures, particularly on the philosophical implications of the use of digital technology in research and education, e.g., machine-learning systems, linked open data applications, online archives, open access publication platforms, text analysis software, and perhaps even discipline-specific social media platforms like Phil-People. In addition, we want to emphasise the question how philosophy itself can make good use of this technology. 

We are therefore looking for philosophical contributions concerning digital knowledge infrastructure, broadly construed. These can cover perspectives from epistemology, aesthetics, ethics, social and political philosophy, philosophy of science, or any other field of philosophical interest. 

Submissions can cover, but are not limited to: 

  • Ethical opportunities of increased use of digital technologies in research and education (and risks too, of course);
  • The position of philosophy in the field of digital humanities, regarding its similarities with and differences to other disciplines;
  • Relevant changes in accessibility of information by increased reliance on digital knowledge infrastructures;
  • The degree to which digital knowledge infrastructures might support ideas of ‘citizen science’, thereby increasing social and political equality;
  • Questions regarding property rights and common access to research and educational information;
  • Risks and opportunities of an increased interdisciplinarity fostered by digital technologies;
  • The general impact of digital technology on philosophical research. 

While this Collection focuses on philosophical perspectives, we also encourage researchers from other disciplines to submit suitable contributions which address topics like those outlined above. 

This article Collection complemented the autumn 2022 Philosophy [in:of:for:and] Digital Knowledge Infrastructures online workshop, hosted by the Digital Academy at the Academy of Sciences and Literature Mainz.

Submit manuscript
Submission guidelines
Manuscript editing services
Colourful representation of digital data transitioning from incomplete to complete stages

Editors

The Collection will publish original research Articles, Reviews and Comments (full details on content types can be found here). Papers will be published in Humanities & Social Sciences Communications as soon as they are accepted and then collected together and promoted on the Collection homepage. All Guest Edited Collections are associated with a call for papers and are managed by one or more of our Editorial Board Members and the journal's Editors.

This Collection welcomes submissions from all authors – and not by invitation only – on the condition that the manuscripts fall within the scope of the Collection and of Humanities & Social Sciences Communications more generally. See our editorial process page for more details.

All submissions are subject to the same peer review process and editorial standards as regular Humanities & Social Sciences Communications Articles, including the journal’s policy on competing interests. The Guest Editors have no competing interests with the submissions, which they handle through the peer review process. The peer review of any submissions for which the Guest Editors have competing interests is handled by another Editorial Board Member who has no competing interests. See our journal policies and submission guidelines for more details.

This Collection is not supported by sponsorship.