Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.
In recent years, the field of psychology has taken great steps to improve the credibility of the research record. Direct replications of past studies have played and continue to play a fundamental role in determining the reliability of psychological effects.
Psychology is a discipline that studies similarities and differences between individuals and a discipline that cares about the real-world meaning of effects demonstrated in closely controlled settings. Therefore, not only replication but also generalization studies are of pivotal importance. Generalization studies extend direct replications, for example by recruiting more diverse additional samples; or by varying the experimental setting or study material.
The Editors at Nature Communications and Communications Psychology invite submissions of direct replication and generalization studies of primary research papers in psychology. As explained in our Editorial, these may come from any subdiscipline of psychology, and be submitted as standard research Articles or Registered Reports. We will highlight relevant papers in this Collection, together with other article types, such as Reviews, Perspectives, and Comments that contribute to the meta-scientific debate.
You can read the Editorial for this Collection here.
Rigorous, robust replication and generalization studies present a significant investment into the quality of the research record, the foundation on which new research is built. Communications Psychology and the Human Behaviour Team at Nature Communications are inviting submissions of replication studies in psychology and the human behavioural sciences.
Most psychological measures are used only once or twice. This proliferation and variability threaten the credibility of research. The Standardisation Of BEhavior Research (SOBER) guidelines aim to ensure that psychological measures are standardised and, unlike toothbrushes, reused by others.
Korbmacher and colleagues from the FORRT project discuss how the last decade can be seen as a credibility revolution for psychological science, benefitting from structural, procedural and community-driven changes.
Lack of information on authors’ contribution to specific aspects of a study hampers reproducibility and replicability. Here, the authors propose a new, easily implemented reporting system to clarify contributor roles in the Methods section of an article.
This Registered Report replicates the finding that not checking the personal cost of helping signals trustworthiness. However, in a third-party punishment setup, avoidance of cost-checking only increased trustworthiness in those who also do not punish.
Reliability of biomarkers is key to their relevance. Out-of-sample generalizability of brain-behavior associations in attention problems and aggression/rule-breaking within the ABCD dataset is high, but generalization to Generation R Study data is limited.
Replicating a finding previously established in German-speaking and English-speaking cohorts, Norwegian-speaking participants likewise form a bimodal distribution of high synchronizers and low synchronizers.
Across a sample of 1,600 individuals spanning 6 to 59 years of age, common saliency models of visual attention predict women’s and young adult’s fixations better than the gaze behaviour of other groups.
Leveraging on large-scale data collection through a smartphone app, Donegan et al show that the association between model-based planning and compulsivity can be estimated with as few as 25 trials
Goal-directed cognition (executive function) is thought to develop through adolescence. Here, the authors find evidence across multiple datasets and measures that executive function develops until 18–20 years old.
A German version of the Interoceptive Accuracy Scale shows similar psychometric properties to the original English version; interoceptive accuracy is negatively related to anxiety, depressive, and somatoform symptoms as well as neurotic traits.