Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Donor Selection

The probability of identifying a 10/10 HLA allele-matched unrelated donor is highly predictable

Abstract

Identification of an unrelated HLA allele-matched hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donor is a costly and time-consuming procedure. To improve search logistics, we have limited the search period to 6 months and have introduced a probability estimate of the chances of identifying a 10/10 HLA allele-matched donor. Probabilities were classified as high (>95%), intermediate (50%) and low (<5% chance) based on allele and haplotype frequencies. By analyzing 350 consecutive searches between 2002 and 2005 (1719 donors tested), the probability estimates turned out to be correct for 96% (high), 88% (low) and 56% (intermediate) patients. For searches with a high probability of success, at least one of the 10 most frequent haplotypes in Caucasoids was found in 69% of the patients, but in only 11% of the patients with a low-probability estimate (P<0.00001). Survival probability at 3 years was significantly higher for HSCT patients classified with a high-probability estimate when compared to patients in the intermediate/low-probability groups (74 vs 51 and 54% respectively, P=0.01). The same difference in survival probabilities was observed when only 10/10 matched unrelated HSCT patients were analyzed. In the intermediate-/low-probability groups, patients with alternative (haploidentical, autologous) or mismatched unrelated donors had similar survival estimates. Probability prediction is therefore feasible in the search process for unrelated donors and can guide the therapeutic strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Copelan EA . Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1813–1826.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gratwohl A, Baldomero H, Frauendorfer K, Urbano-Ispizua A, Niederwieser D . Results of the EBMT activity survey 2005 on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: focus on increasing use of unrelated donors. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007; 39: 71–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heemskerk MB, van Walraven SM, Cornelissen JJ, Barge RM, Breduis RG, Egeler RM et al. How to improve the search for an unrelated haematopoietic stem cell donor. Faster is better than more!. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 35: 645–652.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tiercy JM, Villard J, Roosnek E . Selection of unrelated bone marrow donors by serology, molecular typing and cellular assays. Transplant Immunol 2002; 10: 215–221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hurley CK, Wagner JE, Setterholm MI, Confer DL . Advances in HLA: practical implications for selecting adult donors and cord blood units. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12 (1 Suppl 1): 28–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tiercy J-M, Bujan-Lose M, Chapuis B, Gratwohl A, Gmur J, Seger R et al. Bone marrow transplantation with unrelated donors: what is the probability of identifying an HLA-A/B/Cw/DRB1/B3/B5/DQB1-matched donor? Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 26: 437–441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Petersdorf EW, Anasetti C, Martin PJ, Gooley T, Radich J, Malkki M et al. Limits of HLA mismatching in unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood 2004; 104: 2976–2980.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Souillet G, Rey S, Bertrand Y, Pujol M, Pondarre C, Bourgeot JP et al. Outcome of unrelated bone marrow donor searches in 174 children resulting in 45 patients transplanted in the HLA-matched and -mismatched situation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 26: 31–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pedron B, Duval M, Elbou OM, Moskwa M, Jambu M, Vilmer E et al. Common genomic HLA haplotypes contributing to successful donor search in unrelated hematopoietic transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 31: 423–427.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pedron B, Yakouben K, Adjaoud D, Auvrignon A, Landman J, Guerin V et al. Listing of common HLA alleles and haplotypes based on the study of 356 families residing in the Paris, France, area: implications for unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donor selection. Hum Immunol 2005; 66: 721–731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tiercy J-M . Analysis of 250 HLA-B44 genotypes in European Caucasoids: high diversity and preferential ABCDRB1 associations in B*4402, B*4403, and B*4405 haplotypes. Tissue Antigens 2005; 65: 429–436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cao K, Hollenbach J, Shi X, Shi W, Chopek M, Fernandez-Vina MA . Analysis of the frequencies of HLA-A, B, and C alleles and haplotypes in the five major ethnic groups of the United States reveals high levels of diversity in these loci and contrasting distribution patterns in these populations. Hum Immunol 2001; 62: 1009–1030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klitz W, Maiers M, Spellman S, Baxter-Lowe LA, Schmeckpeper B, Williams TM et al. New HLA haplotype frequency reference standards: high-resolution and large sample typing of HLA DR-DQ haplotypes in a sample of European Americans. Tissue Antigens 2003; 62: 296–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hurley CK, Baxter-Lowe LA, Begovich AB, Fernandez-Vina M, Noreen H, Schmeckpeper B et al. The extent of HLA class II allele level disparity in unrelated bone marrow transplantation: analysis of 1259 National Marrow Donor Program donor-recipient pairs. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 25: 385–393.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schipper RF, D’Amaro J, Bakker JT, Bakker J, van Rood JJ, Oudshoorn M . HLA gene haplotype frequencies in bone marrow donors worldwide registries. Hum Immunol 1997; 52: 54–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams F, Meenagh A, Darke C, Acosta A, Daar AS, Gorodezky C et al. Analysis of the distribution of HLA-B alleles in populations from five continents. Hum Immunol 2001; 62: 645–650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grundschober C, Rufer N, Sanchez-Mazas A, Madrigal A, Jeannet M, Roosnek E et al. Molecular characterization of HLA-C incompatibilities in HLA-ABDR-matched unrelated bone marrow donor-recipient pairs. Sequence of two new Cw alleles (Cw*02023 and Cw*0707) and recognition by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Tissue Antigens 1997; 49: 612–623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Prasad VK, Heller G, Kernan NA, O’Reilly RJ, Yang SY . The probability of HLA-C matching between patient and unrelated donor at the molecular level: estimations based on the linkage disequilibrium between DNA typed HLA-B and HLA-C alleles. Transplantation 1999; 68: 1044–1050.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boucher K, Mori M, Milford E, Beatty PG . Estimation of HLA-A, -B, -DR haplotype frequencies in five racial groups represented in the NMDP donor file. In: Gjertson DW, Terasaki PL (eds). HLA 1998. Published by ASHI: Lenexa, KS, USA, pp 57–78.

  20. Müller C-H, Ehninger G, Goldmann SF . Gene and haplotype frequencies for the loci HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR based on over 13 000 German blood donors. Hum Immunol 2003; 64: 137–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hurley CK, Fernandez-Vina M, Hildebrand WH, Noreen HJ, Trachtenberg E, Williams TM et al. A high degree of HLA disparity arises from limited allelic diversity: analysis of 1775 unrelated bone marrow transplant donor-recipient pairs. Hum Immunol 2007; 68: 30–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Petersdorf EW . Risk assessment in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: histocompatibility. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2007; 20: 155–170.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Tay GK, Witt CS, Christiansen FT, Charron D, Baker D, Herrmann R et al. Matching for MHC haplotypes results in improved survival following unrelated bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 381–385.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chalandon Y, Tiercy J-M, Schanz U, Gungor T, Seger R, Halter J et al. Impact of high resolution matching in allogeneic unrelated donor stem cell transplantation in Switzerland. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 37: 906–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the staff of the LNRH for HLA typing of patients and donors, and to Mrs E Buhrfeind (SBSC) and Mrs H Baldomero (Division of Hematology, University Hospital, Basel) for their contribution in retrieving patient clinical information. This work was supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (no. 320000-112585 and 3200BO-106105/1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J-M Tiercy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tiercy, JM., Nicoloso, G., Passweg, J. et al. The probability of identifying a 10/10 HLA allele-matched unrelated donor is highly predictable. Bone Marrow Transplant 40, 515–522 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705787

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705787

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links