Anticancer properties of a defensin like class IId bacteriocin Laterosporulin10


Laterosporulin10 (LS10) is a defensin like peptide from Brevibacillus sp. strain SKDU10 that inhibited microbial pathogens. However, in this study, anticancer activity of LS10 was examined against different cancer cell lines and compared with normal cells. LS10 displayed cytotoxicity against cancer cells like MCF-7, HEK293T, HT1080, HeLa and H1299 at below 10 μM concentration, but not against prostate epithelium cells RWPE-1. Additionally, no hemolysis was observed at significantly higher concentration compared to IC50 values observed for different cancer cell lines. Release of lactate dehydrogenase from cancer cell lines at 15 μM concentration upon 120 min treatment indicated the lytic ability of LS10. Accordingly, electron microscopy experiments also confirmed the necrotic effect of LS10 at 15 μM concentration against cancer cells. Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis of treated cancer cell lines revealed that LS10 induce apoptosis even at 2.5 μM concentration. Nevertheless, RWPE-1 cells remained viable even at 20 μM concentration. These results provide evidence that LS10 is an anticancer bacteriocin, which causes apoptotic and necrotic death of cancer cells at lower and higher concentrations, respectively. Taken all results together, the present study signifies that LS10 is an anticancer peptide that could be further developed for therapeutic applications.


Cancer is one of the leading cause of death worldwide ( and the frightening statistics underscore the need to examine the novel anticancer agent and modes of therapy1,2,3. The major goal of modern oncology program is to discover better anticancer entities with novel modes of action. Ideally, anticancer drugs should specifically target cancer cells without any toxic effect against normal cells but, unfortunately, most of the available anticancer drugs display severe side effects. Moreover, development of multidrug resistance by cancer cells4,5 makes the situation even more critical. Therefore, to tackle this grim situation, considerable efforts are being made throughout the world over past several years to discover novel and better therapeutic candidates for cancer therapy. In this context, recent utilization of small peptides in cancer treatment6,7 has been attracted a lot of scientific attention as cancer therapeutics.

A large number of naturally occurring antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) from various sources have been reported in the literature that displayed anticancer properties8,9,10. In fact, in the recent past, many live or attenuated bacteria were patented as potential anticancer agents11,12,13. Additionally, microbial products including toxins, enzymes, antibiotics, various proteins, peptides and other low molecular weight products have also been evaluated for their anticancer properties12,14. Various bacterial peptides with antimicrobial activity were also demonstrated activity against cancer cells15,16,17,18,19, however, only a few of these peptides characterized in detail for anticancer activity20,21,22. AMPs produced by bacteria are relatively amenable to bioengineering and demonstrated considerable therapeutic efficacy23,24, therefore, such peptides are considered as promising agents for anticancer therapies19,25,26,27. Most of these AMPs, also known as bacteriocins, are reported to be non-cytotoxic and non-hemolytic in nature28,29. Accordingly, AMPs produced by members of the genus Brevibacillus, particularly Brevibacillus laterosporus produces defensin like antimicrobial peptides30, antibiotics like laterosporamine31, acyl dipeptides like tupuselei amides, antifungal polyketides like basilisk amides32, lipopeptide antibiotic like tauramamide33, cyclodecapeptides like laterocidin and its analogues34 which inhibits growth of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Additionally, novel thrombin inhibitors like bacithrocins A, B and C35 and anticancer antibiotic like spergualin are also reported from strains of B. laterosporus36.

In a recent study we have characterized a defensin like AMP laterosporulin10 (LS10) that showed antibacterial activity against pathogens like M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv and Staphylococcus aureus37. In fact, it selectively inhibited the growth of M. tuberculosis H37Rv at significantly low LD50 values (0.5 μM) when compared to M. smegmatis MC2 155 in in vitro and ex vivo assays. Further, insights into the mechanism of action using electron microscopy and flow cytometry experiments assigned it to the membrane permeabilizing bacteriocins. Since, LS10 efficiently killed M. tuberculosis H37Rv residing inside the macrophages without any antagonistic activity against macrophages37, we further evaluated its anticancer potential and compared with normal cells.


LS10 is a defensin like peptide with randomic structure in solution

Eukaryotic defensins are multifunctional peptides known to exhibit anticancer properties. Therefore, in order to determine the similarity of defensin like bacteriocin LS10 with known eukaryotic defensins, we selected an earlier reported defensin like bacteriocin laterosporulin (LS), human β-defensins (HBD1, HBD2, HBD3) and human neutrophil defensins (HNP1, HNP2, HNP3) which are active against mammalian cells38,39,40. All the sequences were aligned to compare with LS10 (Fig. 1A). As observed for LS, LS10 also contained six cysteine residues which are involved in disulfide bond formation at conserved positions a characteristic feature of eukaryotic defensins30,37. Thus, to get more insight into structural aspects, we have performed circular dichroism (CD) for LS10. Interestingly, CD spectrum of the LS10 in water (Fig. 1B) was characterized by the presence of negative values of molar ellipticity (θ) for wavelengths shorter than 200 nm and a minimum close to 200 nm, a characterstic of random coil conformation41,42. Further, CD spectra obtained in membrane mimicking environments including 5% SDS and 100% TFE were also confirmed the randomic structure of LS1043,44. However, LS10 might acquire a secondary structure as a negative shift is found to be minimum in 5% SDS or 100% TFE when compared to water. The calculations of percentage or level of helicity (H) obtained from the deconvolution of LS10 concentrations and molar ellipticity (θ) confirm the predominance of randomic structures in 5% SDS and 100% TFE as well (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1: Amino acid sequence alignment of LS10 with LS, human β-defensins, human neutrophil defensins and CD spectra under different conditions.

(A) Alignment of LS10 with LS, human beta defensins (HBD1, HBD2, HBD3) and human neutrophil defensins (HNP1, HNP2, HNP3), displayed presence of conserved Cysteine residues involved in disulfide bond formation. (B) CD spectrum of LS10 under different conditions revealed random coil in solution. CD spectra of LS10 in water (blue line), 100% TFE (green line) and in 5% SDS (red line) is shown. All CD spectra were obtained at pH 7.0 in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer.

Cytotoxicity of LS10 towards cancer cells

The anticancer activity of LS10 was examined using five different human cancer cells including HeLa, MCF-7, HT1080, H1299, and HEK293T. The cell lines were incubated with increasing concentration of LS10 (1–20 μM) in their respective growth medium revealed LS10 to be cytotoxic in nature against all cancer cell lines tested (Fig. 2). A dose-dependent cytotoxicity was observed on all cancer cell lines with maximum activity being observed at 10 μM and highest activity against MCF-7 cells. While 40% cytotoxicity was observed on MCF-7 at 5 μM concentration of LS10, only 20% cytotoxicity was displayed by HT1080, HEK293T and H1299. However, no significant cytotoxicity was observed on HeLa cells at 5 μM concentration, but 80% cytotoxicity was observed at 10 μM for HeLa and other cell lines (Fig. 2).

Figure 2: Cell viability assay of human cancer and normal cell lines treated with LS10.

HeLa, HEK293T, HT1080, H1299, MCF-7 and RWPE-1 cells were seeded in 96 well plates. Subsequently, cells were incubated for 24 h with increasing doses of LS10 (0–20 μM) and the cell survival was determined by MTT assay. Blank growth medium and 1% Triton X-100 were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Assay performed in triplicate in three independent experiments. Error bars represent SD. All groups were compared to the controls for statistical significance. P < 0.05 is considered significant.

LS10 showed low toxicity towards normal cells

To be a good anticancer agent, LS10 essentially should not be toxic towards normal cells. Therefore, we sought to examine the cytotoxic effect of LS10 against normal cells with increasing concentration (1–20 μM) against normal prostate epithelium cells (RWPE-1). The results demonstrated that LS10 did not show any cytotoxicity against normal cells up to 15 μM, while significant cytotoxicity was observed against cancer cell lines at this concentration. At 10 μM concentration, more than 95% of normal cells remained viable while 80% of cancer cells lost viability. However, at 20 μM concentration about 20% of normal cells were found to lose viability (Fig. 2). To examine the cytotoxicity of LS10 against red blood cells (RBCs), if any, we performed hemolysis assay in a time-dependent manner for 30 min, 180 min and 24 h intervals using various concentrations (1–100 μM) of LS10. As shown in Fig. 3, no significant hemolysis was observed up to 40 μM concentration of LS10. Therefore, LS10 was concluded as non-hemolytic bacteriocin as it did not cause hemolysis even at 20 times higher concentration of IC50 values against various cancer cell lines (Fig. 3).

Figure 3: Hemolysis ability of LS10.

Hemolysis ability of LS10 was determined using rabbit RBCs. Purified LS10 and RBC samples were prepared in PBS. Assay performed in triplicate in three independent experiments. Error bars represent SD. All groups were compared to the controls for statistical significance. P < 0.05 is considered significant.

LS10 causes lactate dehydrogenase release from cancer cells

To evaluate the activity of LS10 on membrane integrity of cancer and normal cells, we have carried out lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assay with HeLa, MCF-7 and RWPE-1 cells. For this, cells were incubated with increasing concentration of LS10 (2, 5, 10 and 15 μM) and LDH release was monitored up to 24 h at regular time intervals. As shown in Fig. 4, significant LDH release was not observed in HeLa and MCF-7 cells up to 60 min of incubation with all tested concentrations of LS10. However, 50% and 75% increase in LDH release was observed for HeLa and MCF-7 cells respectively, after 120 min of incubation with 15 μM concentration of LS10 (Fig. 4). These results are in accordance with the cell viability assay that displayed significant cytotoxicity against HeLa and MCF-7 cells at 15 μM concentrations of LS10. Interestingly, no LDH release was observed in RWPE-1 cells even after 24 h of incubation at 15 μM concentration of LS10 (Fig. 4).

Figure 4: Effect of LS10 on LDH release in HeLa, MCF-7 and RWPE-1 cells.

HeLa, MCF-7 and RWPE-1 cells were incubated in a time dependent manner (0–24 h) with increasing concentrations (0–15 μM) of LS10. Blank growth medium and 1% Triton X-100 was used as negative and positive control, respectively. Assay performed in triplicate in three independent experiments. Error bars represent SD. All groups were compared to the controls for statistical significance. P < 0.05 is considered significant.

LS10 acts on cell membrane of cancer cells

To further confirm the results of LDH release and MTT assays, scanning electron microscopy was performed using HeLa and MCF-7 cancer cells along with RWPE-1 normal cells treated with LS10. We have primarily observed changes in cell morphology, microscopically upon treatment with LS10 (Figure S1), which were further confirmed by electron microscopy performed under the identical conditions against cancer and normal cells. As shown in Fig. 5, MCF-7 cells treated with 5 μM concentration of LS10, showed significant alterations on the cell membrane. However, HeLa cells displayed profound effect at 15 μM but not at 5 μM concentration of LS10. As a result of LS10 effect, cell membrane of MCF-7 cells became smooth and microvilli were lost from the cell surface even at 5 μM concentration but in case of HeLa cells, the microvilli were completely vanished at 15 μM concentration of LS10 (Fig. 5). On the other hand, no such effect was observed on RWPE-1 cells even after 3 h of treatment with LS10 (Fig. 5). These results were in agreement with the MTT and LDH release assay.

Figure 5: Scanning electron microscopy of HeLa, MCF-7 and RWPE-1 cells treated with LS10.

Scanning electron microscopy micrographs of HeLa, MCF-7 and RWPE-1 cells treated with LS10. Cells in PBS (untreated) and cells after treatment with 5 and 15 μM concentrations of LS10 are shown under respective panel. Untreated cells in PBS were used as control. Suspension of cells and purified LS10 samples were prepared in PBS.

LS10 induces apoptosis in cancer cells

In order to examine the possibility of LS10 to exhibit any other mechanisms of action, we have evaluated its ability to induce apoptosis in cancer and normal cells. Thus, HeLa, MCF-7 and RWPE-1 cells were incubated with sub-lethal concentration (2.5 μM) of LS10 for 2 h and 24 h. The induction of apoptosis was examined by Annexin V/PI staining followed by flow cytometry analysis. Results clearly demonstrated that LS10 induced apoptosis in cancer cells as approximately 90% of HeLa and MCF-7 cells were found to be Annexin V positive after 2 h of treatment when compared to untreated cells (Fig. 6). However, only about 40% RWPE-1 cells were found to be Annexin V positive (Fig. 6). Results after 24 h of treatment with LS10 (Figure S2) were also followed the same pattern as observed for 2 h treatment. These results suggest that LS10 induces apoptosis in cancer cells even at very low concentration and less toxic towards normal cells such as RWPE-1.

Figure 6: LS10 induced apoptosis in HeLa, MCF-7 and RWPE-1 cells.

HeLa, MCF-7 and RWPE-1 cells were incubated with 2.5 μM concentrations of LS10 for 2 h and subsequently trypsinized and washed with ice cold PBS. Cells were stained with Annexin V/PI and analyzed on flow cytometer. Cells in PBS without LS10 treatment and cells after treatment with 2.5 μM concentration of LS10 are shown under respective panel. Experiment performed in triplicate in three independent experiments.


LS10, a defensin like class IId bacteriocin, was isolated from Brevibacillus sp. strain SKDU10 and found to inhibit microbial pathogens but did not found cytotoxic towards macrophages37. Therefore, in the present study we have made an attempt to explore the anticancer potential of defensin like bacteriocin LS10. Sequence alignment of LS10 with other known anticancer defensins demonstrated that cysteine residues are conserved in position with LS that showed typical disulfide bonding pattern with human β-defensins, a key feature defensin like peptides.

So, in order to examine the anticancer activities of LS10, cell viability assays were performed with different cancer cell lines along with normal cell line. LS10 displayed significant cytotoxicity against cancer cell lines with comparable MIC values found against bacterial cells37. Though studies revealed LS10 to be effective against all tested cancer cell lines with maximum potency against MCF-7 and low cytotoxicity against normal cells, further to get more insights, hemolytic properties of LS10 was also tested at different time points (30 min, 180 min and 24 h). Interestingly, LS10 did not show any significant differences in hemolysis at prolonged durations when compared to values obtained during the earlier study37. It is pertinent to mention that most of the AMPs, despite their high anticancer activities, could not move forward in drug development pipeline because of their high hemolytic nature8,45.

The surface of cancer cells is different from the normal cells in many ways46 and one of the major difference is found to be in surface charge. Cancer cells are relatively more negatively charged compared to the normal cells due to the high expression of negatively charged lipid molecules47,48. Therefore, most of the cationic AMPs display broad spectrum of anticancer activities while their selective activity against cancer cells is due to the net high positive charge49,50. AMPs show diverse mechanisms of action against cancer cells, while most of them act on cell membrane, a few others cause the disintegration of mitochondrial membranes also19,49,51. Nisin and its variants are commonly used as a food preservative, and recently they have been reported to induce apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and inhibition of cell proliferation in HNSCC (Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma) cells19,25. The mitochondrial membrane is believed to originate from endosymbiotic prokaryotes and having high similarities with bacterial cell membranes, which is justified by mitochondrial membrane specific activity of AMPs19,51,52. In fact, eukaryotic defensins are also reported to have antimicrobial and anticancer activities9,53,54. Thus, in order to determine defensin like bacteriocin LS10 mediated cancer cell cytotoxicity by membrane disintegration, we have performed LDH release assay, but at 2 to 5 μM concentrations it did not trigger any LDH release. However, at 10 and 15 μM concentrations, LS10 caused significant LDH release after 120 min of treatment in HeLa and MCF-7 cells, suggesting the loss of membrane integrity. These observations were also confirmed by electron microscopy. Interestingly, RWPE-1 did not show any LDH release or adverse effect at 15 μM concentration of LS10 even after 24 h of treatment. Taken all these results together, it can be concluded that LS10 mediated cancer cell cytotoxicity is mainly due to membrane disintegration.

Despite the membrane disintegration many AMPs have been reported to induce apoptosis in cancer cells52,55,56. Similarly, LS10 also induce apoptosis in cancer cells. In fact, LS10 was found to be highly apoptotic for cancer cells at low concentration (2.5 μM) and a multi-action bacteriocin, which induces both apoptosis and necrotic effects when treated with lower and higher concentrations, respectively. It is interesting to note that at 2.5 μM concentration, despite the induction of high apoptosis (90%) in HeLa cells no significant cell death was observed in MTT assay. As synthetic anticancer drugs are very expensive and considering the production of bacteriocin LS10 produced by bacteria with novel antibacterial and anticancer activities against human cancer cells, indicates its potential for applications when compared to eukaryotic/human defensins. In fact, production of small AMPs naturally from bacteria is highly desirable and beneficial to test against cancer cells23,57. In summary, the bacteriocin LS10 is a potential novel anticancer molecule that displayed no adverse effect against normal cells like RWPE-1 and did not cause hemolysis.

Material and Methods

Cell cultures

Human cervical cancer cell line, HeLa and human normal prostate epithelium cell line RWPE-1 were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). Other cell lines like human embryonic kidney cancer cell line (HEK293T), human fibro-sarcoma cell line (HT1080), human lung carcinoma (H1299) and human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) were gifted by Prof. R.N.K. Bamezai, National Centre of Applied Human Genetics, New Delhi, India. HeLa, HEK293T, HT1080 and MCF-7 cells were grown in DMEM medium (Invitrogen, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin cocktail (Sigma, USA). RWPE-1 cells were grown in keratinocyte serum-free medium supplemented with recombinant human epidermal growth factor and bovine pituitary extract (Invitrogen, USA). All cells were maintained in CO2 incubator (ThermoScientific, USA) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 environment.

LS10 peptide

The peptide was extracted from Brevibacillus sp. strain SKDU10 and purified as mentioned previously37. Amino acid sequence of LS10 was compared and aligned with laterosporulin and other human defensins with anticancer properties using Bioedit software (

Circular dichroism

CD experiments were performed using a Jasco 815 spectropolarimeter (JASCO, USA), coupled to a Peltier Jasco PTC-423L system for temperature control. HPLC purified LS10 (0.05 mg/ml) in water was used for the experiments carried out in the presence of SDS micelles (5% SDS) (BioRad, USA) and 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (100% TFE) (Sigma, USA). LS10 samples were also prepared to a final concentration of 0.05 mg/ml in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) for both SDS and TFE experiments. Spectra were collected and averaged over six scans in the spectral range of 195–250 nm, with 0.2 cm path length quartz cells (Starna Scientific, USA) at 37 °C. Parameters used in experiments were 0.2 nm step resolution, 50 nm/min speed, 1 s response time and 1 nm bandwidth. Following baseline correction, the observed ellipticity, θ (m degree) was converted to the molar ellipticity [θ] (degree.cm2.dmol−1)43.

Cell viability assay

Cell viability was determined by using MTT assay. Briefly, HeLa, HEK293T, HT1080, H1299, MCF-7 and RWPE-1 cells (5 × 103 cells/well) were seeded in 96 well plates. Upon 24 h of incubation, the growth medium was replaced with fresh medium containing increasing concentrations of LS10 (1–20 μM). While 1% Triton X-100 (G Biosciences, USA) was used as positive control, blank growth medium as negative control. The plates were incubated for additional 24 h and each well was added with 20 μl of MTT solution (5 mg/ml in PBS) and incubated for 3 h at 37 °C. Subsequently, the MTT containing medium was removed and 50 μl of Dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma, USA) was added to each well. To assess the percentage of live cells in samples, absorbance was read at 590 nm on ELISA plate reader (ThermoScientific, USA).

LDH release assay

The LDH release assay was performed using CytoTox 96 Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay kit (Promega, USA). Briefly, HeLa, MCF-7 and RWPE-1 cells (about 5 × 103 cells/well) were seeded in 96 well plates (BD Falcon, USA). Upon 24 h incubation, culture medium was replaced with fresh medium containing LS10 (2, 5, 10 and 15 μM). Blank growth medium was used as negative control and 1% Triton X-100 as positive control. After, 30 min, 60 min, 120 min and 24 h of treatment with different concentrations of LS10, culture medium was collected and centrifuged. Aliquots of 50 μl from each reaction were incubated with 50 μl of reaction buffer supplied with CytoTox 96 Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay kit (Promega, USA). After 30 min incubation in dark at room temperature, 50 μl stop solution was added to each reaction well and the release of LDH was measured by reading absorbance at 490 nm using ELISA plate reader (ThermoScientific, USA). Cytotoxicity of LS10 was determined by comparing LDH release with the positive control (1% Triton X-100 treated cells).

Electron microscopy

HeLa, MCF-7 and RWPE-1 cells (about 106 cells/well) were seeded on poly-lysine (Sigma, USA) coated hemocytometer cover slips, placed in 24 well plates (BD Falcon) and incubated in 5% CO2 environment at 37 °C temperature. After 24 h, growth medium was replaced with medium containing LS10 (5 and 15 μM, in triplicate). Cells without peptide treatment served as negative control. After 3 h treatment with LS10, cells were washed thrice with ice cold PBS to remove all unattached cells and fixed in modified karnovsky’s fixative for 2 h. Subsequently, cells were treated with OsO4 (Sigma, USA) for 1 h. Further, cells were dehydrated in graded ethanol sequentially with 30 min incubation for each step at 4 °C (30–100%). Ethanol dehydrated samples were freeze-dried and processed further as mentioned earlier58. Cover slips were placed on aluminium stubs using silver paint and sputter coated with gold. Cells were then observed and photographed using S-260, Leica Cambridge, scanning electron microscope (BRUKER, USA).

Apoptosis assay

Apoptosis assay was performed using apoptosis assay kit (Invitrogen, USA). Briefly, HeLa, MCF-7 and RWPE-1 cells were seeded in 24 well tissue culture plates (about 2 × 105 cells/well) and incubated for 24 h. Subsequently, culture medium was replaced with fresh medium containing 2.5 μM of LS10 along with a negative control (cells without peptide). Apoptosis induced by the peptide was examined by Annexin V/PI staining followed by flow cytometry analysis of stained cells. Briefly, after 2 h and 24 h of incubation with LS10, cells were harvested, washed twice with cold PBS and resuspended in 1X Annexin binding buffer. Cells were then transferred to fresh 1.5 ml tube containing 100 μl of binding buffer and 5 μl of FITC-conjugated Annexin V and 1 μl of PI were added. The cells were vortexed gently and incubated for 15 min at room temperature in dark. After incubation, 200 μl of 1X Annexin binding buffer was added to each tube and stained cells were analyzed by Accuri flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, USA) with CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, USA) used for analysis of the results.

Statistical analysis

All comparisons were based on the mean +/− standard deviation of the mean (SD). Parametric data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Bonferroni posttest method for comparison between groups. Column statistics for nonparametric data were analyzed by using the D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test along with a one-sample t test. Results were considered significant when P values were <0.05. All experiments were performed independently three times in triplicate.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Baindara, P. et al. Anticancer properties of a defensin like class IId bacteriocin Laterosporulin10. Sci. Rep. 7, 46541; doi: 10.1038/srep46541 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1

    Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 65, 5–29 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Howlader, N. et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2012, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD,, based on November 2014 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2015. (2015).

  3. 3

    American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2016. Cancer Facts & Figures 2016, 1–9 (2016).

  4. 4

    Moitra, K. Overcoming Multidrug Resistance in Cancer Stem Cells. BioMed Research International 2015, 8 pages (2015).

  5. 5

    Di, C. & Zhao, Y. Multiple drug resistance due to resistance to stem cells and stem cell treatment progress in cancer (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 9, 289–293 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Sarafraz-Yazdi, E., Pincus, M. R. & Michl, J. Tumor-targeting peptides and small molecules as anti-cancer agents to overcome drug resistance. Curr. Med. Chem. 21, 1618–30 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Thundimadathil, J. Cancer treatment using peptides: current therapies and future prospects. J. Amino Acids 2012, 13 pages (2012).

  8. 8

    Gaspar, D., Salomé Veiga, a. & Castanho, M. a. R. B. From antimicrobial to anticancer peptides. A review. Front. Microbiol. 4, 1–16 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Hoskin, D. W. & Ramamoorthy, A. Studies on anticancer activities of antimicrobial peptides. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Biomembranes 1778, 357–375 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Chu, H.-L. et al. Novel antimicrobial peptides with high anticancer activity and selectivity. PLoS One 10, e0126390 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Patyar, S. et al. Bacteria in cancer therapy: a novel experimental strategy. J. Biomed. Sci. 17, 21 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Fialho, A. M., Bernardes, N. & Chakrabarty, A. M. Recent patents on live bacteria and their products as potential anticancer agents. Recent Pat. Anticancer. Drug Discov. 7, 31–55 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Fialho, A. M. & Chakrabarty, A. M. Recent patents on bacterial proteins as potential anticancer agents. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov 2, 224–234 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Baindara, P. et al. Characterization of two antimicrobial peptides produced by a halotolerant Bacillus subtilis strain SK.DU.4 isolated from a rhizosphere soil sample. AMB Express 3, 2 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Lux, T., Nuhn, M., Hakenbeck, R. & Reichmann, P. Diversity of bacteriocins and activity spectrum in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Bacteriol. 189, 7741–7751 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Sand, S. L., Nissen-Meyer, J., Sand, O. & Haug, T. M. Plantaricin A, a cationic peptide produced by Lactobacillus plantarum, permeabilizes eukaryotic cell membranes by a mechanism dependent on negative surface charge linked to glycosylated membrane proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr. 1828, 249–259 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Lee, D. G. et al. Functional and structural characteristics of anticancer peptide Pep27 analogues. Cancer Cell Int. 5, 21 (2005).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Hetz, C., Bono, M. R., Barros, L. F. & Lagos, R. Microcin E492, a channel-forming bacteriocin from Klebsiella pneumoniae, induces apoptosis in some human cell lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2696–2701 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Joo, N. E., Ritchie, K., Kamarajan, P., Miao, D. & Kapila, Y. L. Nisin, an apoptogenic bacteriocin and food preservative, attenuates HNSCC tumorigenesis via CHAC1. Cancer Med. 1, 295–305 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Chumchalová, J. & Smarda, J. Human tumor cells are selectively inhibited by colicins. Folia Microbiol. (Praha). 48, 111–115 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Sand, S. L. et al. Plantaricin A, a peptide pheromone produced by Lactobacillus plantarum, permeabilizes the cell membrane of both normal and cancerous lymphocytes and neuronal cells. Peptides 31, 1237–1244 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Lagos, R., Tello, M., Mercado, G., García, V. & Monasterio, O. Antibacterial and antitumorigenic properties of microcin E492, a pore-forming bacteriocin. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 10, 74–85 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Cotter, P. D., Ross, R. P. & Hill, C. Bacteriocins - a viable alternative to antibiotics? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 95–105 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Lohans, C. T. & Vederas, J. C. Development of class IIa bacteriocins as therapeutic agents. Int. J. Microbiol. 2012, 13 pages (2012).

  25. 25

    Kamarajan, P. et al. Nisin ZP, a Bacteriocin and Food Preservative, Inhibits Head and Neck Cancer Tumorigenesis and Prolongs Survival. PLoS One 10, 7 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Kaur, S. & Kaur, S. Bacteriocins as potential anticancer agents. Frontiers in Pharmacology 6, 272 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Cornut, G., Fortin, C. & Soulières, D. Antineoplastic properties of bacteriocins: revisiting potential active agents. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 399–404 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Baindara, P. et al. Characterization of the antimicrobial peptide penisin, a class Ia novel lantibiotic from Paenibacillus sp. strain A3. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 60, 580–591 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Martinez, R. C. R. et al. Biochemical, antimicrobial and molecular characterization of a noncytotoxic bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST71KS. Food Microbiol. 34, 376–381 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Singh, P. K. et al. The intramolecular disulfide-stapled structure of laterosporulin, a class IId bacteriocin, conceals a human defensin-like structural module. FEBS J 282 (2), 203–214 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Shoji, J., Sakazaki, R., Wakisaka, Y., Koizumi, K. & Mayama, M. Isolation of a new antibiotic, laterosporamine. Studies on antibiotics from the genus Bacillus. XIII. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo). 29, 390–393 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Barsby, T., Kelly, M. T. & Andersen, R. J. Tupuseleiamides and basiliskamides, new acyldipeptides and antifungal polyketides produced in culture by a Bacillus laterosporus isolate obtained from a tropical marine habitat. J. Nat. Prod. 65, 1447–1451 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Desjardine, K. et al. Tauramamide, a lipopeptide antibiotic produced in culture by Brevibacillus laterosporus isolated from a marine habitat: Structure elucidation and synthesis. J. Nat. Prod. 70, 1850–1853 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Qin, C., Xu, C., Zhang, R., Niu, W. & Shang, X. On-resin cyclization and antimicrobial activity of Laterocidin and its analogues. Tetrahedron Lett. 51, 1257–1261 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Kamiyama, T. et al. Bacithrocins A, B and C, novel thrombin inhibitors. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo). 47, 959–68 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Umezawa, K. & Takeuchi, T. Spergualin: a new antitumour antibiotic. Biomed. Pharmacother. 41, 227–232 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Baindara, P. et al. Laterosporulin10: A novel defensin like class iid bacteriocin from brevibacillus sp. strain SKDU10 with inhibitory activity against microbial pathogens. Microbiol. (United Kingdom) 162, 1286–1299 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Lichtenstein, a., Ganz, T., Selsted, M. E. & Lehrer, R. I. In vitro tumor cell cytolysis mediated by peptide defensins of human and rabbit granulocytes. Blood 68, 1407–1410 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Lichtenstein, A. K., Ganz, T., Nguyen, T. M., Selsted, M. E. & Lehrer, R. I. Mechanism of target cytolysis by peptide defensins. Target cell metabolic activities, possibly involving endocytosis, are crucial for expression of cytotoxicity. J. Immunol. 140, 2686–94 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    McKeown, S. T. W. et al. The cytotoxic effects of human neutrophil peptide-1 (HNP1) and lactoferrin on oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in vitro . Oral Oncol. 42, 685–690 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Gopal, R., Park, J. S., Seo, C. H. & Park, Y. Applications of circular dichroism for structural analysis of gelatin and antimicrobial peptides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 3229–3244 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Avitabile, C., D’Andrea, L. D. & Romanelli, A. Circular Dichroism studies on the interactions of antimicrobial peptides with bacterial cells. Sci. Rep. 4, 4293 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Kelly, S. M., Jess, T. J. & Price, N. C. How to study proteins by circular dichroism. 1751, 119–139 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Haney, E. F., Nazmi, K., Bolscher, J. G. M. & Vogel, H. J. Structural and biophysical characterization of an antimicrobial peptide chimera comprised of lactoferricin and lactoferrampin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr. 1818, 762–775 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Yang, Q. Z. et al. Design of potent, non-toxic anticancer peptides based on the structure of the antimicrobial peptide, temporin-1CEa. Arch. Pharm. Res. 36, 1302–1310 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Rasmussen, N. & Ditzel, H. J. Scanning the cell surface proteome of cancer cells and identification of metastasis-associated proteins using a subtractive immunization strategy. J. Proteome Res. 8, 5048–5059 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Walter, G. J. et al. Interaction with activated monocytes enhances cytokine expression and suppressive activity of human CD4+CD45ro+CD25+CD127low regulatory T cells. Arthritis Rheum. 65, 627–638 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Utsugi, T., Schroit, a. J ., Connor, J., Bucana, C. D. & Fidler, I. J. Elevated Expression of Phosphatidylserine in the Outer-Membrane Leaflet of Human Tumor-Cells and Recognition by Activated Human Blood Monocytes. Cancer Res. 51, 3062–3066 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Mader, J. S. & Hoskin, D. W. Cationic antimicrobial peptides as novel cytotoxic agents for cancer treatment. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 15, 933–46 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Riedl, S., Zweytick, D. & Lohner, K. Membrane-active host defense peptides - Challenges and perspectives for the development of novel anticancer drugs. Chem. Phys. Lipids 164, 766–781 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Smolarczyk, R. et al. Anticancer effects of CAMEL peptide. Lab. Invest. 90, 940–952 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Cho, J. et al. The novel biological action of antimicrobial peptides via apoptosis induction. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 22, 1457–1466 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Lichtenstein, A. Mechanism of mammalian cell lysis mediated by peptide defensins: Evidence for an initial alteration of the plasma membrane. J. Clin. Invest. 88, 93–100 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Jaquelina Julia Guzmán-Rodrígueza, Rodolfo López-Gómezb, Rafael Salgado-Garcigliab, Alejandra Ochoa-Zarzosaa, Joel E. López-Mezaa. The defensin from avocado (Persea americana var. drymifolia) PaDef induces apoptosis in the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Biomed. Pharmacother. 82, 620–627 (2016).

  55. 55

    Oyinloye, B., Adenowo, A. & Kappo, A. Reactive Oxygen Species, Apoptosis, Antimicrobial Peptides and Human Inflammatory Diseases. Pharmaceuticals 8, 151–175 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Lee, J. & Lee, D. G. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) with dual mechanisms: Membrane disruption and apoptosis. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25, 759–764 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Hancock, R. E. W. & Sahl, H. G. Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1551–7 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Raje, M. et al. Charged nylon membrane substrate for convenient and versatile high resolution microscopic analysis of Escherichia coli & mammalian cells in suspension culture. Cytotechnology 51, 111–117 (2006).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


Financial assistance from the Department of Biotechnology (grant no. DBT/In-Bz/2013-16/16/SO-R1) is duly acknowledged and also the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR network project BSC-119, Human microbiome; Man as superorganism). We thank Dr. Mohammad Askandar Iqbal, Department of Biotechnology, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi for useful discussions and National Center of Applied Human Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, for sharing the cancer cell lines. We thank Ms. Sumeeta Kumari for help in maintainance of the cell lines. We also thank Mr. Anil Theophilus and Randeep Sharma for their help in electron microscopy.

Author information




P.B., A.G., G.P.S.R. and S.K. involved in experiment design. P.B. and A.G. performed the experiments. P.B., A.G., G.P.S.R. and S.K. involved in analysis of results and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suresh Korpole.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baindara, P., Gautam, A., Raghava, G. et al. Anticancer properties of a defensin like class IId bacteriocin Laterosporulin10. Sci Rep 7, 46541 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing