Accelerometer assessed moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and successful ageing: results from the Whitehall II study


Physical activity is key for successful ageing, but questions remain regarding the optimal physical activity pattern. We examined the cross-sectional association between physical activity and successful ageing using data on 3,749 participants (age range = 60–83years) of the Whitehall II study. The participants underwent a clinical assessment, completed a 20-item physical activity questionnaire, and wore a wrist-mounted accelerometer for 9 days. Successful ageing was defined as good cognitive, motor, and respiratory functioning, along with absence of disability, mental health problems, and major chronic diseases. Time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) episodes assessed by accelerometer was classified as “short” (1–9.59 minutes) and “long” (≥10 minutes) bouts. Linear multivariate regression showed that successful agers (N = 789) reported 3.79 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.39–6.19) minutes more daily MVPA than other participants. Accelerometer data showed this difference to be 3.40 (95% CI:2.44–4.35) minutes for MVPA undertaken in short bouts, 4.16 (95% CI:3.11–5.20) minutes for long bouts, and 7.55 (95% CI:5.86–9.24) minutes for all MVPA bouts lasting 1 minute or more. Multivariate logistic regressions showed that participants undertaking ≥150 minutes of MVPA per week were more likely to be successful agers with both self-reported (Odd Ratio (OR) = 1.29,95% (CI):1.09–1.53) and accelerometer data (length bout ≥1 minute:OR = 1.92, 95%CI:1.60–2.30). Successful agers practice more MVPA, having both more short and long bouts, than non-successful agers.


More than one in ten adults globally is aged 60 years or older and this proportion is predicted to almost double by 20501. Population ageing raises economic and societal challenges that stem from increased burden of multimorbidity and disability1. It also emphasizes the need for better understanding of preventive or curative strategies that would allow individuals to live free of disease longer and in good functional health2. Multiple risk and protective factors are associated with successful ageing3,4. One of them is physical activity4 which reduces risk of diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and cancers, and may also be neuroprotective2,5. The World Health Organization recommends that older adults practice at least 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per week, made up of bouts lasting a minimum 10 minutes6.

There is considerable evidence linking physical activity to successful ageing in cross-sectional7,8,9 and longitudinal studies10,11,12,13. However, this evidence is based on self-reported physical activity which is prone to reporting biases. Recent studies using objective measures of physical activity, such as accelerometers, have mostly examined associations of health with total duration of physical activity. These studies found more physical activity14,15,16 or MVPA15,17 to be associated with favorable cardiometabolic outcomes18,19 and better motor15,16 and cognitive14,17 function. There is also some evidence to suggest that time spent in both short and long MVPA bouts is associated with better cardio-metabolic health20,21,22 and reduced risk of multimorbidity23. However, the importance of physical activity patterns, such as the duration of physical activity bouts and their intensity, for successful ageing has not yet been examined.

Our objective is to compare physical activity, assessed via questionnaire and accelerometer, between successful and non-successful agers using data from a well characterized cohort of community dwelling older adults, aged 60 to 83 years. We also compared the proportion of successful agers in physical activity groups defined by duration in MVPA bouts, and length and intensity of MVPA bouts.


Study population

We used data from the Whitehall II cohort study, established in 1985/1988 on 10,308 British civil servants (67% men) aged 35–55 years24. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the ethics committee of University College London (reference number 85/0938) and conducted in accordance with the 2008 Helsinki Declaration. The study design consists of a clinical examination every 3 to 6 years since study inception. Accelerometer measurement was added to the study at the 2012/2013 wave of data collection for participants seen at the central London clinic and for those living in the South-Eastern regions of England who had their clinical assessment at home. For logistical reasons (charging and configuration of the devices), participants seen at home who resided in other parts of UK could not be offered the accelerometer measurement.

Whitehall II data, protocols, and other metadata are available to the scientific community. Please refer to the Whitehall II data sharing policy at

Physical Activity

Physical activity was assessed in 2012/2013 using questionnaire and accelerometer.


Physical activity was assessed using a modified version of the validated Minnesota leisure-time physical activity questionnaire25,26, including 20-items on frequency and duration of participation in different physical activities (e.g., walking, cycling, sports). Participants were requested to take into account activity patterns over the past four weeks, at work and leisure. For each activity, including the open-ended items, we assigned a metabolic equivalent (MET) value by using the latest version of the compendium of activity energy costs27. One MET value reflects the intensity of the activity relative to lying quietly. All activities with MET values of 3 or above were coded as MVPA and summed to yield total numbers per week.


At the clinical examination (on average 5 days after completion of the questionnaire), participants with no contraindications (allergies to plastic or metal, traveling abroad the following week) were asked to wear a triaxial accelerometer (GENEActiv Original; Activinsights Ltd, Kimbolton, Cambs, UK, on their non-dominant wrist for 9 consecutive, 24-hour, days. Acceleration was recorded at 85.7 Hz (corresponding to around 86 measurements per second) and as in previous studies using devices recording raw accelerometry28,29,30,31, acceleration was expressed relative to gravity (g units; 1 g = 9.81 m.s−2; 1 mg = 0.00981 m.s−2)). Calibration error was estimated based on static periods in the data and corrected if necessary (calibration correction range = 0.8 to 10.0 mg, mean correction = 2.5 mg)32. Next, the Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO), was used to quantify the acceleration related to the movement registered and expressed in milligravity (mg)33. Negative values were rounded to zero and ENMO values averaged over 5 second epochs.

As part of the accelerometer measurement, sleep periods were detected using a previously validated algorithm34. Data from the first waking to waking on the penultimate day were extracted, corresponding to 7 full days. For the present analysis, only data over the day (periods between waking and sleep onset) were used. Participants were included in the analysis if they had valid data, defined as daily wear time ≥2/3 of waking hours, for at least 2 weekdays and 2 week-end days. Non-wear time was estimated using a previously reported algorithm33 and was replaced by personalized mean value for each participant, calculated from their data on other days at the same time of day31,35.

In order for physical activity to be classified as MVPA, mean acceleration in the 5s-epoch (ENMO) needed to be at or above 100 mg28,29,30,36,37. To remove signals related to random wrist movement, we only retained activities lasting at least 1 minute for which 80% of the activity satisfied the 100 mg threshold criteria. In order to test the importance of length of a bout of physical activity, we identified bouts lasting 1 to 9 minutes 59 seconds and those lasting 10 minutes or more, hereafter labeled “short” and “long” bouts20,21 (further details in Supplementary Methods). Time spent in MVPA bouts lasting 1 minute or more was calculated as the sum of short and long bouts. The daily accelerometer-assessed time in MVPA over a week was calculated as the mean of measures over 7 days. For participants with less than 7 valid days of data, the following formula was used to standardize measurement to one week for all participants: [(5 × mean daily weekday MVPA time + 2 × mean daily week-end MVPA time)]/7. Accelerometer data were processed in R using the GGIR package (

Assessment of successful ageing

We used data from the study baseline (1985/1988) to 2012/2013 to ascertain successful ageing. As in previous studies, we used a comprehensive definition of successful ageing that included better function (free of disability, good mental health and better cognitive, motor and respiratory function) and absence of major chronic disease (coronary artery disease, stroke, diabetes, cancer and neurodegenerative disease)13,38. Chronic diseases were assessed from 1985/1988 to 2012/2013. Coronary heart disease, including myocardial infarction and definite angina, and stroke events were identified using linkage to national hospital records. Diabetes mellitus was defined as fasting blood glucose level of 7.0 mmol/L or more, HbA1c ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol) based on blood sample assessed at the clinical examination, self-reported doctor-diagnosed diabetes, or the use of medications for diabetes. Cases of cancer were determined using the National Health Service’s cancer register. Neurodegenerative diseases included Parkinson’s disease and dementia and were assessed using linkage to national hospital records and mental health service dataset.

Functioning outcomes were assessed at the 2012/2013 wave of data collection. Disability was assessed based on participants’ responses to 6 questions on perceived difficulties in basic activities of daily living lasting for at least 3 months (dressing, walking, bathing/showering, eating, getting in or out of bed, using the toilet), with difficulties in one or more activities taken to signal disability. Mental health was assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale questionnaire, a 20-items questionnaire designed to assess prevalence of depressive symptoms39, with scores below the threshold of 16 seen to indicate good mental health39. We defined better cognitive, motor and respiratory functioning as scores above the sex- and age-standardized tertile (i.e. above the 33.3th percentile) for each measure. Cognitive functioning was assessed using a score of global cognition calculated as a standardized score of performances in 4 cognitive domains (short-term memory, attention (Trail-Making Test A), executive function (composite score of the Alice-Heim 4 and the Trail-Making Test B) and fluency (semantic and phonemic fluency tests)); motor function using walking speed measured over an 8-footlong course and respiratory function using forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) divided by height squared.


Sociodemographic variables were assessed by questionnaire in 2012/2013 and included age, sex, ethnicity (white and non-white), occupational position at age 50 years (high, intermediate or low, representing income and status at work) and education (university degree or lower). Health behaviours were also assessed by questionnaire. Smoking status was defined as current, past, and never smokers. Alcohol consumption was assessed using a question on the quantity of alcohol consumed in the previous week and was classified as no alcohol consumption in the previous week, moderate alcohol consumption (1–14 units/week in women and 1–21 units/week in men), and heavy drinkers (14 + units in women and 21 + units in men). The frequency of fruit and vegetable consumption was assessed on a 9- point scale, ranging from “seldom or never” to “4 or more times a day”, and was categorized as less than daily, once per day, or more than once per day. Season of data collection via accelerometer for each participant (winter: 21st of December to 20th of March, spring: 21st of March to 20th of June, summer: 21st of June to 20th of September, and autumn: 21st of September to 20th of December) was also included as a covariate.

Statistical analyses

Two sets of analyses were undertaken. One, multivariate linear regression was used to compare mean MVPA duration (dependent variable) between successful agers and all others (independent variables). These analyses were repeated to study differences in mean acceleration, a measure of intensity, during MVPA bouts. Two, in order to compare the proportion of successful agers in different groups of physical activity patterns, the association of different physical activity characteristics (independent variable) with successful ageing (dependent variable) was examined using multivariate logistic regression and results expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used cubic splines to explore the shape of the association between MVPA and odds of successful ageing. All analyses, apart from the spline regressions, were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, education, smoking status, alcohol consumption, fruit and vegetable consumption, season and accelerometer wear time, with variables entered as categories as described in the Covariates section, apart from age which was entered as a continuous variable.

Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess whether: 1) associations with MVPA were similar for components used to construct the successful ageing phenotype; 2) findings were similar when a more stringent cut-off of 120 mg was used to define MVPA using accelerometer data; 3) study findings could be explained partly by reverse causation by excluding from the analysis participants with disability and those who died within two years of the 2012/2013 data collection.

For all analyses, the statistical significance level was set at 0.05 and all tests were two-sided. We used Stata 13 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX) for cubic splines regression and graphics; all others statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).


Population selection

Of the 6,308 participants seen at the 2012–2013 wave of data collection, accelerometers were proposed to 4,880 participants (4,680 seen at the London clinic and 200 at home). Among them, 210 had contraindications, 4,282 (87.7%) consented, and 3,953 participants had valid accelerometer data. Data on physical activity questionnaire were available for 3,929 of these participants. In addition, chronic disease and functioning measurements for the successful ageing outcome were available on 3,773 of these participants. In total, 3,749 participants had information on successful ageing status, accelerometer and questionnaire physical activity data and covariates (flow chart in Supplementary Figure S1).

Compared to those not included in the analysis (n = 2,559), the analytic sample included participants who were younger (69.4 vs. 70.6 years, P < 0.001), more likely to be men (74.1% vs. 65.0%, P < 0.001) or from the lowest occupational position (10.8% vs. 15.8%, P < 0.001). The participants included in the analysis were also more likely to report ≥150 minutes of MVPA per week (52.7% vs. 47.6%, P < 0.001) and to qualify as successful agers (21.1% vs. 13.0%, P < 0.001).

Study population characteristics

Among participants included in the analysis, 96.1% (N = 3,603) had valid accelerometer data for 7 days, 2.6% (N = 98) for 6 days, and 1.3% (N = 48) for 4–5 days. Missing data were replaced for 1–2 hours over the full observational period for 24.6% of the participants, 2–5 hours for 0.9% of the participants, 5–10 hours for 0.6% of the participants, and 10–25 hours for 0.1% of the participants. Table 1 presents characteristics of the study population. Spearman correlation coefficients of time spent in MVPA assessed by questionnaire with time spent in accelerometer-assessed MVPA short, long and ≥1 minute bouts were: 0.24 (p < 0.001), 0.24 (p < 0.001), and 0.27 (p < 0.001), respectively.

Table 1 Characteristics of the study population.

Physical activity in successful agers and the others

Overall, successful agers practiced more MVPA than all others (unadjusted models, all p < 0.0001, Table 1). Linear multivariate regression showed successful agers to report 3.79 (95% CI: 1.39, 6.19) minutes more MVPA. Accelerometer data suggested this difference to be 3.40 (95% CI: 2.44, 4.35) minutes for MVPA undertaken in short bouts, 4.16 (95% CI: 3.11, 5.20) minutes for long bouts and 7.55 (95% CI: 5.86, 9.24) minutes for all MVPA in bouts of 1 minute or more. In addition, the intensity of MVPA as measured by mean acceleration of MVPA bouts was higher in successful agers than in the others (mean ENMO difference = 8.75 mg; 95% CI: 5.65, 11.85). This difference corresponds to 22% of the standard deviation of mean acceleration of MVPA bouts in the study sample.

Proportion of successful agers by physical activity group

Figure 1 shows the probability of successful ageing to be higher with increasing time spent in MVPA albeit with a plateauing of effects at longer durations; associations were stronger using accelerometer- than questionnaire-assessed MVPA. This general pattern was also observed for proportion of successful agers by categories of time spent in MVPA (Table 2). Accelerometer data show that in those with daily duration of MVPA < 10 min, the prevalence of successful ageing was 9.3%; this rose to 29.5% in those with 30 min of MVPA or more per day. The corresponding estimates for questionnaire data were 14.9 and 25.8%.

Figure 1

Probability of successful ageing as a function of daily duration in MVPA.

Table 2 Association between daily duration of MVPA and weekly recommendation with successful ageing.

Short and long bouts as defined by accelerometer data had a similar association with successful ageing: in multivariate logistic analyses, OR estimates for a 10-minute increase per day of MVPA undertaken in short and long bouts were 1.17 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.26) and 1.15 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.22), respectively (Table 2). This led us to use MVPA bouts lasting 1 minute or more as the bout metric in subsequent analysis. For every 10-minute increase in MVPA per day, the odds for successful ageing increased by 4% (95% CI: 2%, 7%) when using reported MVPA compared to 16% (95% CI: 12%, 20%) with accelerometer data – the non-overlapping confidence intervals suggest that the difference in ORs is statistically significant at p < 0.05. For accelerometer-assessed MVPA, 10–20 min and 20–30 min of MVPA per day was associated with around 2.2–2.5-fold higher odds of successful ageing compared to < 10 min MVPA. Reanalysis using 10–20 min MVPA as the reference group showed 20 min or more of MVPA to be associated with 1.38 greater odds of successful ageing (95% CI: 1.12, 1.69).

Further analysis to test whether the pattern of MVPA mattered for those undertaking the recommended ≥150 minutes of MVPA per week showed similar associations with successful ageing in those undertaking MVPA in bouts of 1 minute or more or 10 minutes or more (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.60, 2.30 and 1.74, 95% CI: 1.38, 2.18 respectively). The pattern was similar, albeit associations weaker, using questionnaire-assessed MVPA (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.53, Table 2).

The odds ratio of successful ageing increased as the intensity of accelerometer assessed MVPA increased (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.26 for 1 SD (39.4 mg) higher acceleration). Compared to the first quartile of intensity, the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartile of MVPA intensity were associated with an OR of successful ageing of 1.50 (95% CI: 1.17, 1.94), 1.42 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.84), and 1.75 (95% CI: 1.35, 2.27), respectively.

Sensitivity analyses

The associations between MVPA and successful ageing were also observed when chronic disease and functioning were considered as separate outcomes (Table 3). Apart from good mental health, MVPA was linked to all functioning components, with associations being stronger for absence of disability and motor function (Table 3). For mental health, an association with MVPA was only observed for questionnaire data, possibly reflecting common method variance, and for long accelerometer-assessed bouts, possibly reflecting gains only over longer periods of MVPA. Associations with successful ageing and its components were similar when using the more stringent MVPA cut-point of 120 mg (Supplementary Table S1). Excluding participants who reported disability and those who died in two years following data collection from the analysis somewhat attenuated the associations in the main analysis (Supplementary Table S2).

Table 3 Association of daily duration and weekly recommendation of MVPA with components of successful ageing.


This study based on 3,749 adults aged 60 to 83 years presents three key findings. First, accelerometer data show that successful agers spend on average 8 minutes more per day in MVPA than their unhealthy counterparts; both longer daily duration and higher intensity of MVPA bouts were associated with greater probability of successful ageing. Second, associations between MVPA and successful ageing were stronger with physical activity assessed by accelerometer. Third, length of a bout of MVPA, short (1–9.59 min) or long (≥10 min), did not modify the association of MVPA with successful ageing.

Our data show the prevalence of successful ageing to be higher with longer duration of MVPA, with a weakening of the effect at daily durations longer than 20 or 30 minutes. Similar findings, albeit with questionnaire-assessed physical activity and a range of health outcomes, have been reported40,41,42. A recent meta-analysis concluded that although more total physical activity was associated with lower risk for breast and colon cancer, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and ischemic stroke, major gains were observed at lower levels of activity, with diminishing returns at higher levels of activity42. For example, compared to less active participants (<600 MET.minutes/week), the risk of colon cancer was reduced by 10%, 17% and 21% respectively in those reporting 600–3999, 4000–7999, and ≥8000 MET.minutes/week. In our study, successful ageing was twice as likely for daily MVPA of 10 to 20 minutes, compared to less than 10 minutes. However, compared to 10 to 20 minutes per day of MVPA, successful ageing was only 38% more likely in those undertaking 20 to 30 minutes of MVPA per day. Our findings on MVPA intensity are concordant; with fewer benefices at higher intensity levels. This is in agreement with recent findings suggesting that even a little MVPA is good for successful ageing43.

Previous studies, based on cross-sectional or longitudinal designs, have found that longer self-reported duration in MVPA was associated with greater likelihood of successful ageing7,8,10,11,12,13,44. Our findings add to this evidence using data on both subjective and objective assessments of MVPA. We show that the association with successful ageing was more pronounced for MVPA assessed by accelerometer compared to questionnaire. Previous studies have also shown objective assessments of physical activity to be more strongly associated with metabolic syndrome45, biomarkers46 and obesity indicators37. Taken together these findings suggest that measurement error inherent to self-reported physical activity measures leads to misclassification, attenuating associations with health outcomes47. In relation to successful ageing, it is possible that the compendium of physical activities, developed for adults up to 65 years, does not adequately reflect physical activity patterns of older adults.

Public health messages encourage people to undertake bouts of physical activity lasting a minimum of 10 minutes. However, bouts of less than 10 minutes are likely to be more achievable for older adults. We found associations with successful ageing to be similar for MVPA bouts lasting less than 10 minutes and 10 minutes or more. Few previous studies reported similar association with time spent in short and long bouts of MVPA with cardio-metabolic outcomes20,21,22 and multimorbidity23. Indeed, bouts of MVPA of at least 10 minutes are recommended for cardiorespiratory fitness6,48, although appropriate experimental studies to assess associations between duration spent in different lengths of MVPA bouts and health outcomes are lacking48.

Strengths of this study include its large study sample, the use of both questionnaire- and accelerometer-assessed physical activity, and high compliance for accelerometer wear among participants. Cross-sectional design is a limitation, precluding inferences about temporality, such as whether physical activity preceded successful ageing or was preceded by successful ageing. However, sensitivity analyses excluding participants with disability and those who died in 2 years after data collection suggest that our findings cannot be entirely explained by reduced physical activity in already sick participants. Furthermore, we have previously used longitudinal data, using questionnaire-assessed MVPA, to show an association of physical activity with successful ageing13. Future longitudinal studies using accelerometers are needed to confirm the findings in the present study. Second, although the sample covered a wide socioeconomic range, data are from an occupational cohort and are not representative of the general population (i.e. composed of more men and highly educated participants). In addition, the analytic sample was composed of the more physically active participants, who were more likely to age successfully. Taken together, these aspects would lead to be an underestimation of the association between MVPA and successful ageing.

In conclusion, accelerometer data from a large sample of UK older adults suggest that successful agers practiced MVPA for longer duration and at higher intensity. Higher proportion of successful agers was also observed in those practicing more MVPA, independently of the length of the MVPA bout. Future studies using a longitudinal design should examine whether physical activity predicts successful ageing over time.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Menai, M. et al. Accelerometer assessed moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and successful ageing: results from the Whitehall II study. Sci. Rep. 7, 45772; doi: 10.1038/srep45772 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1

    WHO. World report on ageing and health. (World Health Organization, 2015).

  2. 2

    WHO. Active ageing: A policy framework. (2002).

  3. 3

    Depp, C. A. & Jeste, D. V. Definitions and predictors of successful aging: a comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies. The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry 14, 6–20, doi: 10.1097/01.JGP.0000192501.03069.bc (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    King, A. C. & Guralnik, J. M. Maximizing the potential of an aging population. JAMA 304, 1944–1945 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Blondell, S. J., Hammersley-Mather, R. & Veerman, J. L. Does physical activity prevent cognitive decline and dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. BMC public health 14, 510, doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-510 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    WHO. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. (World Health Organization 2010, 2010).

  7. 7

    Baker, J., Meisner, B. A., Logan, A. J., Kungl, A. M. & Weir, P. Physical activity and successful aging in Canadian older adults. Journal of aging and physical activity 17, 223–235 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Dogra, S. & Stathokostas, L. Sedentary behavior and physical activity are independent predictors of successful aging in middle-aged and older adults. Journal of aging research 2012, 190654, doi: 10.1155/2012/190654 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Lin, P. S., Hsieh, C. C., Cheng, H. S., Tseng, T. J. & Su, S. C. Association between Physical Fitness and Successful Aging in Taiwanese Older Adults. PloS one 11, e0150389, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150389 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Almeida, O. P. et al. 150 minutes of vigorous physical activity per week predicts survival and successful ageing: a population-based 11-year longitudinal study of 12 201 older Australian men. British journal of sports medicine 48, 220–225, doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092814 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Hamer, M., Lavoie, K. L. & Bacon, S. L. Taking up physical activity in later life and healthy ageing: the English longitudinal study of ageing. British journal of sports medicine 48, 239–243, doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092993 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Janssen, I. Midlife physical activity affects successful aging in women. Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine 21, 71–72, doi: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000393476.50545.b1 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Sabia, S. et al. Influence of individual and combined healthy behaviours on successful aging. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l’Association medicale canadienne 184, 1985–1992, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121080 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Barnes, D. E. et al. Cognition in older women: the importance of daytime movement. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 56, 1658–1664, doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01841.x (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Gerdhem, P., Dencker, M., Ringsberg, K. & Akesson, K. Accelerometer-measured daily physical activity among octogenerians: results and associations to other indices of physical performance and bone density. European journal of applied physiology 102, 173–180, doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0571-z (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Huisingh-Scheetz, M. J. et al. Relating wrist accelerometry measures to disability in older adults. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 62, 68–74, doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.09.004 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Zhu, W. et al. Association Between Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Cognitive Function in Older Adults-The Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 63, 2447–2454, doi: 10.1111/jgs.13829 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    O’Donovan, G., Hillsdon, M., Ukoumunne, O. C., Stamatakis, E. & Hamer, M. Objectively measured physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic risk factors in the Health Survey for England. Preventive medicine 57, 201–205, doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.022 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Tudor-Locke, C. et al. Step-based Physical Activity Metrics and Cardiometabolic Risk: NHANES 2005-06. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, doi: 10.1249/mss.0000000000001100 (2016).

  20. 20

    Glazer, N. L. et al. Sustained and shorter bouts of physical activity are related to cardiovascular health. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 45, 109 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Jefferis, B. J. et al. Does duration of physical activity bouts matter for adiposity and metabolic syndrome? A cross-sectional study of older British men. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity 13, 36, doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0361-2 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Loprinzi, P. D. & Cardinal, B. J. Association between biologic outcomes and objectively measured physical activity accumulated in &gt;/= 10-minute bouts and &lt;10-minute bouts. American journal of health promotion : AJHP 27, 143–151, doi: 10.4278/ajhp.110916-QUAN-348 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Loprinzi, P. D. Associations between bouted and non-bouted physical activity on multimorbidity. Clinical physiology and functional imaging, doi: 10.1111/cpf.12350 (2016).

  24. 24

    Marmot, M. & Brunner, E. Cohort Profile: the Whitehall II study. International journal of epidemiology 34, 251–256, doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh372 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Jacobs, D. R., Jr., Ainsworth, B. E., Hartman, T. J. & Leon, A. S. A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 25, 81–91 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Richardson, M. T., Leon, A. S., Jacobs, D. R., Jr., Ainsworth, B. E. & Serfass, R. Comprehensive evaluation of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire. Journal of clinical epidemiology 47, 271–281 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Ainsworth, B. E. et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 43, 1575–1581, doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12 (2011).

  28. 28

    da Silva, I. C. et al. Physical activity levels in three Brazilian birth cohorts as assessed with raw triaxial wrist accelerometry. International journal of epidemiology 43, 1959–1968, doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu203 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Hildebrand, M., VT, V. A. N. H., Hansen, B. H. & Ekelund, U. Age group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist- and hip-worn monitors. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 46, 1816–1824, doi: 10.1249/mss.0000000000000289 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Rowlands, A. V., Yates, T., Davies, M., Khunti, K. & Edwardson, C. L. Raw Accelerometer Data Analysis with GGIR R-package: Does Accelerometer Brand Matter? Medicine and science in sports and exercise 48, 1935–1941, doi: 10.1249/mss.0000000000000978 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Sabia, S. et al. Association between questionnaire- and accelerometer-assessed physical activity: the role of sociodemographic factors. American journal of epidemiology 179, 781–790, doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt330 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    van Hees, V. T. et al. Autocalibration of accelerometer data for free-living physical activity assessment using local gravity and temperature: an evaluation on four continents. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 117, 738–744, doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00421.2014 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    van Hees, V. T. et al. Separating movement and gravity components in an acceleration signal and implications for the assessment of human daily physical activity. PloS one 8, e61691, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061691 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    van Hees, V. T. et al. A novel, open access method to assess sleep duration using a wrist-worn accelerometer. PloS one 10, e0142533 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Catellier, D. J. et al. Imputation of missing data when measuring physical activity by accelerometry. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 37, S555–562 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Bell, J. A. et al. Healthy obesity and objective physical activity. The American journal of clinical nutrition 102, 268–275, doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.110924 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Sabia, S. et al. Physical Activity and Adiposity Markers at Older Ages: Accelerometer Vs Questionnaire Data. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 16, 438. e437–438. e413 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Akbaraly, T. N. et al. Chronic inflammation as a determinant of future aging phenotypes. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l’Association medicale canadienne 185, E763–770, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.122072 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Radloff, L. S. The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied psychological measurement 1, 385–401 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Arem, H. et al. Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship. JAMA internal medicine 175, 959–967 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Aune, D., Sen, A., Henriksen, T., Saugstad, O. D. & Tonstad, S. Physical activity and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. European journal of epidemiology 31, 967–997, doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0176-0 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Kyu, H. H. et al. Physical activity and risk of breast cancer, colon cancer, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and ischemic stroke events: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 354, i3857, doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3857 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Hupin, D., Roche, F. & Edouard, P. Physical Activity and Successful Aging: Even a Little Is Good. JAMA internal medicine 175, 1862–1863, doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4744 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Sun, Q. et al. Physical activity at midlife in relation to successful survival in women at age 70 years or older. Archives of internal medicine 170, 194–201, doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.503 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Tucker, J. M., Welk, G. J., Beyler, N. K. & Kim, Y. Associations between physical activity and metabolic syndrome: comparison between self-report and accelerometry. American Journal of Health Promotion 30, 155–162 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Atienza, A. A. et al. Self-reported and objectively measured activity related to biomarkers using NHANES. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 43, 815–821 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Greenland, S. The effect of misclassification in the presence of covariates. American journal of epidemiology 112, 564–569 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    PAGAC. Physical activity guidelines advisory committee report, 2008. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services 2008, A1–H14 (2008).

Download references


This research is supported by the US National Institutes of Health (R01AG013196; R01AG034454; R01HL036310), the UK Medical Research Council (K013351), the British Heart Foundation (PG/29605), and the Economic and Social Research Council (ES/J023299). The funding organizations had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information




M.K., A.S.M. and S.S. conceived, designed and performed the experiments. M.M. and V.T.H. analysed the data. M.M. and S.S. wrote the paper. M.M., V.T.H., A.E., M.K., A.S.M. and S.S. were involved in interpreting results and editing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Séverine Sabia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Menai, M., van Hees, V., Elbaz, A. et al. Accelerometer assessed moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and successful ageing: results from the Whitehall II study. Sci Rep 7, 45772 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.