Fluorescence microscopy is rapidly turning into nanoscopy. Among the various nanoscopy methods, the STED/RESOLFT super-resolution family has recently been expanded to image even large fields of view within a few seconds. This advance relies on using light patterns featuring substantial arrays of intensity minima for discerning features by switching their fluorophores between ‘on’ and ‘off’ states of fluorescence. Here we show that splitting the light with a grating and recombining it in the focal plane of the objective lens renders arrays of minima with wavelength-independent periodicity. This colour-independent creation of periodic patterns facilitates coaligned on- and off-switching and readout with combinations chosen from a range of wavelengths. Applying up to three such periodic patterns on the switchable fluorescent proteins Dreiklang and rsCherryRev1.4, we demonstrate highly parallelized, multicolour RESOLFT nanoscopy in living cells for ~100 × 100 μm2 fields of view. Individual keratin filaments were rendered at a FWHM of ~60–80 nm, with effective resolution for the filaments of ~80–100 nm. We discuss the impact of novel image reconstruction algorithms featuring background elimination by spatial bandpass filtering, as well as strategies that incorporate complete image formation models.
Scanning super-resolution1,2 approaches including STED (STimulated Emission Depletion)3 and RESOLFT (REversible Saturable/Switchable Optical Linear Fluorescence Transitions)4,5,6 enjoy increasing popularity, in large measure due to their robust, direct image acquisition procedure. The STED/RESOLFT approach enables nanoscale recordings without the need for indirect, reciprocal-space data processing to obtain an image. In the STED/RESOLFT concepts, features located within subdiffraction length scales are directly discerned by transiently preparing their molecules in two distinct states (fluorescence ‘on’ and ‘off’) using a pattern of light featuring one or more intensity minima. STED nanoscopy has been applied for more than a decade, including to living organisms7,8, providing resolutions down to 20 nm in biological specimens9.
However, STED microscopy requires relatively large illumination intensities (MW/cm2) because the transition from the fluorescent (on) to the dark (off) ground state by stimulated emission has to occur within the few nanoseconds lifetime of the on-state. A successful strategy to reduce the required intensity is to select transitions between on- and off-states of longer lifetimes. Such states are provided by reversibly switchable fluorescent proteins (RSFPs), where the two states are caused by atom relocations within the fluorescent molecule (cis-trans- isomerization) or by addition of a water molecule. Hence, RSFPs can be switched with lower light intensities, commonly in the W/cm2 to kW/cm2 range. Although RESOLFT was initially introduced6 as a general concept, it later became associated and was realized with RSFPs10,11,12.
The initial demonstration of RSFP-based RESOLFT dates from 2005 (ref. 10), but only more recently has the development of new RSFPs allowed to provide proofs of concept of its promise as a nanoscale imaging tool in living cells at reduced light levels11,12,13,14,15,16. The low-intensity switching can be associated with reduced imaging speed. This limitation can be effectively counteracted by scanning with a pattern of standing waves that provides multiple intensity minima (parallelized RESOLFT)17. More recently, this scheme has also been extended to STED18,19, but the need for high STED intensity limits the number of minima to a few thousands at a time. In parallelized RESOLFT, on the other hand, switching at low light intensities has rendered the implementation with ~100,000 simultaneous intensity minima possible. Like for the single-point scanning implementations of the methods, the demonstrated resolutions of parallelized RESOLFT17 to date lag behind those of parallelized STED (20–30 nm)19. It is worth noting that the RSFPs used for parallelized RESOLFT were of the so-called negative-switching class. These are proteins for which the excitation light concurrently induces the on→off transition. As a result, the number of emitted fluorescence photons per switching cycle is limited. Further improvements to (parallelized) RESOLFT could therefore come from exploring RSFPs which do not suffer from this limitation. We here give an example of this, and describe highly relevant advances in both the light patterning required for switching and in the RESOLFT image reconstruction.
Specifically, we chose to develop parallelized RESOLFT capabilities for the previously introduced RSFP Dreiklang12,21. Distinct from all other RSFPs20, all three processes, the on- and off-switching as well as fluorescence excitation of Dreiklang, are decoupled and individually addressable with light of different wavelengths. While this feature allows to tune the fluorescence signal per switching cycle and hence the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the raw image data, its optimal implementation demands three co-aligned periodic light patterns of different wavelengths. These light patterns can be generated with shared phase gratings and achromatic projection optics such that their periods closely match in the sample. In a common beam path, we implemented patterned switching and fluorescence excitation of Dreiklang and the negative-switching RSFP rsCherryRev1.422,23 with laser light. However, since our projection optics had low transmittance of light at ~360 nm wavelength, we used a homogeneous LED illumination for switching Dreiklang on.
Parallelized RESOLFT implementations to date suffer from the blurry background stemming from out-of-focus features, as is well-known in wide-field microscopy. We addressed this issue by novel RESOLFT image reconstruction methods based on either a spatial bandpass filtering or a maximum likelihood fitting of the acquired images. This greatly improved the contrast of the RESOLFT images without sacrificing spatial resolution.
Parallelized RESOLFT nanoscopy using periodic standing-wave patterns can be realized in several ways, notably by an interferometer approach with reflective beam splitting19 or by diffractive beam splitting using a diffraction grating17,24, or in principle by any other phase-changing device. In the interferometer approach a laser beam is first divided into two equal parts with a beam splitter. The individual beams are displaced from the optical axis of the microscope, recombined using a similar splitter and then focused on the back focal plane of the objective lens. It might look as if reflective splitting entails achromatic (wavelength-independent) beam paths due to identical reflection angles for different wavelengths, as well as direct beam control. However, chromatic dependence is unavoidable during beam recombination in the focal plane of the objective lens, where the beams are brought to interfere. The situation is different with diffractive beam splitting, where chromatic dependence is compensated for by the chromatic dependence of the interference at the sample.
We used two binary linear phase gratings with a bar-to-space ratio of 1:1 (0.5 duty cycle) and imaged them into the sample by transferring only their first diffraction orders. The phase gratings were oriented perpendicularly to each other and were lit by s-polarized light to maximize the contrast of the interference pattern in the sample. Note that the interference of p-polarized light at high incidence angles would result in a strong z-polarized component that would partially fill the intensity minima. Insofar as the imaging optics is achromatic, diffractive beam splitting and projection results in an interference pattern of equal period over a broad wavelength range. This is evident for microscopic imaging systems following the Abbe sine condition to achieve a uniform lateral magnification. For perpendicular incidence (θi = 0), the first-order beams are diffracted by the phase grating under an angle , where λ is the wavelength and the grating period. An imaging system following the Abbe sine condition transfers the beams into the sample at an angle , where they form an interference pattern with an intensity period of (Fig. 1a). We used phase gratings with μm and set up a lateral demagnification × of the imaging optics. Thus, we obtained an illumination period of nm.
Supplementary Fig. 1 outlines the optical setup and its key components. The illumination patterns were imaged into the sample by two relay systems and the microscope optics. A first Keplerian telescope (lenses L2 and L3) was used to select the first diffraction orders. The order selection mask (OS) was inserted to block the non-diffracted zero-order light. A second Keplerian telescope (lenses L4 and L5) allowed to insert a tip-tilt scan mirror for shifting the illumination patterns without a need of moving the sample. Figure 1b–d shows images of the illumination patterns at 405, 488 and 592 nm wavelength, confirming the achromatic imaging of the gratings into the sample. The illumination periods at 488 and 592 nm wavelength differed by about 1 nm from the period at 405 nm wavelength, allowing for parallelized RESOLFT imaging in fields spanning up to ~300 periods (~100 μm) when accepting a shift of up to ~40% of a period between the illumination patterns. Supplementary Fig. 13 shows the lateral shifts of the coordinates of the fluorescence peaks in the full image field of 104 μm. The illumination patterns for 405 and 488 nm wavelengths were imaged by the induced fluorescence of an Alexa Fluor 488 layer on camera 1. Therefore, the positions of the fluorescence peaks accurately report on the illumination patterns in the sample. However, the 592 nm illumination pattern excited a layer of ATTO590 whose fluorescence was imaged on camera 2. The larger and asymmetric shifts of the 592 nm pattern are partially due to differences in the aberrations of the two imaging paths. When imaging rsCherryRev1.4 we did not observe a significant modulation in brightness across the field of view that would indicate an insufficient match of the 592 and 405 nm patterns in the sample. Thus, we could comfortably image in fields of ~70 μm extent and up to ~100 μm when accepting a reduced image homogeneity in the border region.
Our parallelized RESOLFT setup can project illumination patterns in a wavelength range of ~400 to ~600 nm and can therefore operate with a large range of proteins requiring different wavelengths for switching and fluorescence excitation. In particular, it allows patterned fluorescence read-out, which in a previous realization of parallelized RESOLFT was performed using spatially uniform illumination17. Patterned read-out reduces the light exposure of the sample by illuminating mainly the sample regions where the molecules are left on after switching, i.e. the coordinates targeted by the minima of the off-switching pattern. Non-switched background and out-of-focus light is reduced as well, while the effective lateral resolution is mostly determined by the off-switching step (Supplementary Fig. 14).
Utilization of diffraction gratings offers further benefits such as increased opto-mechanical robustness and insensitivity versus wavelength drift. Higher opto-mechanical stability is achieved due to the common-path geometry used for projecting the diffracted beams into the sample. Also, any drift of the grating is demagnified 50×. In addition, laser beams with short coherence length can be used to create illumination patterns that are less perturbed by stray interference fringes from dust particles and optics irregularities.
We modified a commercial two-colour parallelized RESOLFT microscope (Abberior Instruments GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) and adapted it for Dreiklang12. The setup is described in detail in the Supplementary Methods. Dreiklang was switched on with spatially uniform UV-light from an LED source (λ = 365 nm, pE-4000, CoolLED, UK) coupled into the objective lens with a thin dichroic mirror (T387lp-UF1, AHF, Germany) transmitting wavelengths >390 nm. We recorded the images by scanning pairs of orthogonally overlapped standing-wave patterns for off-switching and for fluorescence read-out across the stationary sample. The fluorescence images collected by the objective lens were descanned so that the minima of the off-switching pattern remained stationary on the camera sensor. The camera recorded an image for each scan position. The pattern period was 360 nm for all wavelengths and was scanned in 10 or 14 steps along the (x, y) directions, resulting in a pixel size of 36 or 26 nm in the reconstructed RESOLFT images.
Dreiklang was imaged by applying the following illumination sequence at each scan position: (i) spatially uniform illumination (λ = 365 nm; 0.2 kW/cm2 for 15 ms) switched Dreiklang on; (ii) patterned near-UV light (MLD 405–200, Cobolt AB, Sweden; λ = 405 nm; 1 kW/cm2 for 45 ms) switched it off everywhere except in the minima; and (iii) the proteins remaining on were probed by exciting fluorescence with patterned blue light (MLD 488–200, Cobolt AB, Sweden; λ = 488 nm; 1.5 kW/cm2 for 12 ms) shifted by half a period relative to the off-switching pattern. The full 104 μm × 104 μm field of view was sampled in 142 = 196 images within 17 seconds. Faster imaging can be achieved by shorter illumination periods at higher intensities. We deliberately chose a longer readout period than applied in point-scanning RESOLFT12 to achieve better SNR in the raw images.
The acquired raw images showed significant background in regions with many sample features outside the imaged focal section. The previously published analysis method17 estimated the in-focus and out-of-focus signals by integrating the image intensities in small pinholes placed at the positions of the minima and maxima of the off-switching pattern. These positions were identified as the periodic maxima and minima of the average image intensity. The local average out-of-focus signal was then subtracted from the in-focus signal to reconstruct the focal section at high resolution. However, due to the spatial extent of the in-focus detection point spread function (PSF), the correct identification of the in-focus and out-of-focus signal contributions is challenging.
We improved the image reconstruction over the previously published method17 to more accurately identify the positions of the minima (nulls) of the off-switching illumination pattern and to better reject the fluorescence emission from out-of-focus features. These new analysis algorithms are described in detail in the Supplementary Methods.
The positions of the nulls were determined by analysing the average image intensity for the global x and y periods of the intensity peaks. Small misalignments and distortions of the illumination pattern were taken into account. We determined the local shifts of the nulls by correlating the periodic pattern with the fluorescence intensity peaks in neighbourhoods of 20 periods extent (Supplementary Fig. 2).
The rejection of the out-of-focus and non-switching background signal was addressed by one of two approaches:
(a) A spatial bandpass filter was applied to the raw images to suppress non-switching and low-frequency signals before integrating the signals in pinholes placed at the intensity peaks. We used a Gaussian smoothing of the raw images with a full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of of a period to filter noise and then took the 2D Laplacian to enhance the signal variations. This combined linear filter acts on an image region of three periods extent and suppressed out-of-focus signals very efficiently. However, as the filter response is negative in an annulus around the central peak, it may suppress also the in-focus signals in the immediate vicinity of a very bright feature. We removed this potentially artifactual effect to a large degree by reattributing the signals according to the response of the bandpass filter and the pinholes (Supplementary Fig. 3).
(b) Based on the known positions of the potentially highly emissive regions in the sample, we applied an image formation model for estimating the various signal contributions to the raw images. The image formation model accounted for contributions from several optical sections – the focal section and two out-of-focus sections located further from the cover slip – by estimating for each null and each section the fluorescence signal as a model coefficient. The model itself consisted of the detection PSFs for fluorescence emission at these positions in the sample (Supplementary Fig. 4). The PSFs were calculated in the pixelated sensor matrix individually for each null applying calculation tools developed by Leutenegger et al.25,26,27. We used an iterative conjugate gradient fitting algorithm to maximize the likelihood of observing the acquired raw images given the model and its coefficients.
Examination of recorded RESOLFT images of Dreiklang fused to keratin19 (Fig. 2) shows that thin filaments can be identified with improved resolution while they appeared blurred in the corresponding wide-field images. Figure 2a and Supplementary Fig. 6 show a reconstructed wide-field image as summed from the acquired images by resampling each image at the RESOLFT pixel size and at its true position. Figure 2b and Supplementary Fig. 7 illustrate the contrast enhancement obtained by deconvolving the wide-field image with the theoretical detection PSF. Both images show poor contrast due to high background from many defocused sample features. The FWHM of individual filaments is about 220 nm, and so is the diffraction-limited spatial resolution.
Figure 2c and Supplementary Fig. 8 illustrate the RESOLFT image quality as obtained with the previously published analysis, but already amended by the local estimation of the nulls’ positions. The background was estimated as 80% of the average signal in between the diagonal neighbours of each null. The residual stripes are attributed to a different photo-bleaching behaviour of the (non-switching) background versus the signals at the nulls. This method could not very reliably disentangle the background from the true signal, as evidenced by the still pronounced presence in all regions, where the wide-field image shows notable out-of-focus emission.
Figure 2d and Supplementary Fig. 9 illustrate the RESOLFT image quality with the spatial bandpass filtering pre-processing. The image contrast is improved significantly throughout. Note that some dark regions are produced around the very bright features in the cell on the top right of the image (displayed as saturated pixels). In these regions, the bandpass filtered images show negative values which were not fully compensated by the reattribution step.
The imaging model-based RESOLFT reconstruction efficiently distinguished between the emissions from out-of-focus features including potential non-switchable background and the wanted emission from in-focus features. Figure 2e and Supplementary Fig. 10 show the in-focus image obtained by analysing the experiment with the imaging model. The focused features are visible with high contrast on a negligible background. The quality of the RESOLFT image of this measurement remained limited by the moderate SNR, and neither the bandpass filtering nor the model-based analysis improved the lateral resolution as compared to the previous analysis method. To compare the contrast and resolutions of the five imaging methods, Fig. 2f–i zoom into an interesting region. A line profile crossing three or four filaments shows that the contrast improved by more than an order of magnitude from the wide-field image to the model-based RESOLFT reconstruction. Individual filaments were typically imaged with 60–80 nm FWHM as determined by fitting a Lorentzian function to cross-sections (Supplementary Figs 10 and 11; 36 profiles averaged over 5 pixels (130 nm) along the filaments). The bundle of (likely three) filaments and one separate filament crossing the line profile were resolved at ~60 nm and 120 nm mutual distances (Fig. 2j), where the wide-field and deconvolved images show a single feature of ~300 nm FWHM. The analysis of closely spaced, nearly parallel filaments was mostly hampered by other filaments crisscrossing above or beneath. It is worthwhile to note for interpretation that keratin protein bundles to form intermediate filaments that are of varying diameters, and that it is consequently the thinnest filaments which are most suitable for resolution estimates.
We further demonstrate parallelized RESOLFT nanoscopy with Dreiklang fused to the microtubule associated protein MAP2 (Fig. 2k,l and Supplementary Fig. 12a,b) and the endoplasmic reticulum (Fig. 2m,n and Supplementary Fig. 12c,d).
The achromatic grating projection simplified the acquisition of multi-colour images using green and red RSFPs, such as Dreiklang and rsCherryRev1.423. For these proteins, we found it challenging to image both RSFPs simultaneously or in an interleaved manner, because the relatively long irradiation with 405 nm light to switch Dreiklang off weakened the rsCherryRev1.4 signal by photobleaching. Therefore, we imaged Dreiklang after the rsCherryRev1.4 images had been taken. Each spectral range was acquired by a dedicated sCMOS camera (Hamamatsu ORCA-Flash4.0 V2). The dual-colour images are shown in Fig. 3. For the dual-colour images, rsCherryRev1.4 was imaged in 10 × 10 scan steps: (i) on-switching with 405 nm light at 0.2 kW/cm2 for 1.5 ms; (ii) off-switching with 592 nm light at 0.9 kW/cm2 for 50 ms; and (iii) read-out with 592 nm light at 0.9 kW/cm2 for 10 ms. Dreiklang was imaged using the same scan steps: (i) uniform on-switching with 365 nm light at 0.2 kW/cm2 for 15 ms; (ii) off-switching with 405 nm light at 0.2 kW/cm2 for 80 ms; and (iii) read-out with 488 nm light at 0.8 kW/cm2 for 10 ms.
We demonstrated that the diffractive pattern generation and imaging adopted in our parallelized RESOLFT nanoscope is sufficiently achromatic to allow for illuminations at several wavelengths with light patterns of equal periodicity. Essentially any fluorescent marker – with arbitrary requirements on excitation, switching and emission spectra – could be utilized by feeding the respective laser wavelengths to the illumination system. This will readily facilitate the adoption of new fluorescent proteins as they become available (e.g. refs 28, 29, 30). We showed that the resolution of parallelized RESOLFT can be increased to 60–80 nm in living cells expressing the RSFP Dreiklang. In terms of applicability to other RSFPs with specific wavelength requirements, parallelized RESOLFT might be limited by residual chromatic aberrations. On the hardware side, inexpensive continuous-wave (cw) lasers of sufficient power are available in the entire visible wavelength spectrum, readily facilitating the adoption of new switchable fluorophores.
We showed novel image reconstruction analyses that significantly improve RESOLFT image contrast by efficiently eliminating out-of-focus background. Spatial bandpass filtering of the raw images, at little computational cost, can analyse an acquired image sequence in about a minute. Being essentially an edge enhancer, a similar spatial bandpass filter cannot be applied to the wide-field image as it would break up continuous features. At the cost of significant computation time (~30 s per raw image), our imaging-model-based analysis further decomposes the raw image contributions into fluorescence emissions from predefined regions with clearly different PSF sections – which distinguishes it from deconvolution algorithms that assume a location-independent PSF and/or do not restrict the locations of signal origins. Without knowledge of the restricted set of positions of fluorescence emissions, it is hardly possible to decompose a raw image into contributions from different sections, because a blurred image of an out-of-focus object could always be interpreted as an extended object in the focal plane. In contrast, knowing the positions and their sparse distribution in the sample allows to accurately attribute the origins of the different signals making up the raw images. In order to find the coefficients reliably, the raw images must provide redundant information. As the illumination patterns were imaged by the camera sensor with ~3.5 pixels per period, there were about twelve pixels per null. A decomposition into three coefficients per null seemed reasonable as it still offered some redundancy for dealing with noise.
Particular RSFP combinations may enable additional information channels per camera sensor, e.g. two colour channels sharing the same emission spectrum based on the opposite switching action of 405 nm light on Dreiklang and an off-switching RSFP such as rsEGFP11,13. Both proteins can be excited and read out at 488 nm wavelength, but 405 nm light switches Dreiklang off and rsEGFP on. The practical limitation of such an imaging scheme is some off-switching background from rsEGFP, which will result in cross-talk into the Dreiklang channel. Such photochromic channel separation could conceivably be combined with genuine spectral separation like the presented Dreiklang + rsCherryRev1.4 combination to implement tricolour parallelized RESOLFT imaging. As their properties are crucial for the image formation and RESOLFT image quality, improving the proteins in terms of brightness, switching contrast and speed will augment this versatile nanoscopy method further.
Raw images acquisition
Two-dimensional sets of coordinates were established by the periodic light patterns switching fluorescent proteins on and off. Fluorescence was excited by patterned illumination. The tip-tilt scan mirror projected the sequence of illumination patterns at the desired coordinates. The induced signals were imaged simultaneously on camera sensors. The illumination patterns were scanned in multiple steps to cover the entire unit cell of the periodic pattern such that all positions in the sample were addressed. The fluorescence was descanned to ensure that the signals within a unit cell were always imaged at the same detector pixels, facilitating the correction for pixel-specific non-uniformities (converter gain and noise, dark current) and the image reconstruction. The acquired raw images were further processed to attribute the signals to their respective coordinates (Supplementary Figs 2–4, Supplementary Methods).
Correcting the pattern displacement
The lateral offsets between patterns of different wavelengths were determined separately along the horizontal and vertical directions. During the measurements for either component, the respective other was blocked (no light in orthogonal pattern component). To establish the offset between 405 nm and 488 nm patterns (Supplementary Fig. 5), pairs of images of dense keratin19–Dreiklang structures in HeLa cells were acquired. For each image, Dreiklang was switched on by 365 nm light, then switched off by patterned 405 nm light and finally imaged by patterned 488 nm light. The first image of each pair was acquired by displacing the read-out pattern by 180 nm with respect to the off-switching pattern. The second image of each pair was acquired by other pattern displacements in steps of 10 nm from 0 to 360 nm to cover a full period. The mean intensities of the second images were then normalized by the mean intensities of the first images to account for photo-bleaching. The normalized fluorescence was therefore modulated due to variable spatial coincidence of off-switching and read-out, being minimal when the two patterns were completely overlapping, and maximal when completely out-of-phase. Hence, the relative offset between the patterns of two wavelengths was determined and taken into account for subsequent measurements. The same strategy was used with rsCherryRev1.4 for measuring the lateral offset between 405 nm (on-switching) and 592 nm (off-switching and read-out) illumination patterns. Due to the low dose needed for switching on and the good switching contrast of Dreiklang and rsCherryRev1.4, the offset of the on-switching versus the off-switching pattern was less crucial here than the offset of the read-out versus the off-switching pattern.
For direct imaging of the pattern with 405 nm and 488 nm light, a sample with a thin layer of Alexa Fluor 488 was created. The surface of a standard microscope cover glass (#1.5) was functionalized with the amine group via amino-silanization chemistry. After that, NHS-ester of Alexa Fluor 488 (Life Technologies, USA) was conjugated to the amine groups, producing a thin and close to uniform layer of the fluorophore. For the imaging of the pattern with 592 nm light, we diluted the fluorophore ATTO590 (ATTO-Tec, Germany) to 1 μM concentration in polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and spun 150 μL of the solution onto standard (#1.5) microscope cover glasses (4000 rpm, 30 s). The cover glasses with the fluorophore layer were mounted onto microscope glass slides using 20 μL DPX mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich, USA).
Expression of fusion proteins in HeLa cells
To express protein fusions of Dreiklang with keratin19, MAP2 and the endosplasmatic reticulum’s retention signal KDEL, previously reported plasmids were used12. HeLa cells were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in DMEM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) containing 10% FBS (PAA Laboratories, Cölbe, Germany), 1 mM pyruvate (Sigma, St.-Louis, USA) 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 100 μg/ml penicillin (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany). For transfection, cells were seeded on coverslips in a 6-well plate. After one day cells were transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 24 to 48 hours after transfection cells were washed and mounted with phenol-red free DMEM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) onto concavity slides. To prevent samples from drying, the coverslips were sealed with twinsil (Picodent, Wipperfürth, Germany). Finally the cells were imaged at room temperature. For two-colour experiments keratin19–rsCherryRev1.4 was additionally expressed using the plasmid pMD-Ker19-rsCherryRev1.423.
How to cite this article: Chmyrov, A. et al. Achromatic light patterning and improved image reconstruction for parallelized RESOLFT nanoscopy. Sci. Rep. 7, 44619; doi: 10.1038/srep44619 (2017).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Hell, S. W. Far-Field Optical Nanoscopy. Science 316, 1153–1158 (2007).
Huang, B., Babcock, H. & Zhuang, X. Breaking the diffraction barrier: super-resolution imaging of cells. Cell 143, 1047–1058 (2010).
Hell, S. W. & Wichmann, J. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated-emission - stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. Opt Lett 19, 780–782 (1994).
Hell, S. W., Jakobs, S. & Kastrup, L. Imaging and writing at the nanoscale with focused visible light through saturable optical transitions. Appl Phys A 77, 859–860 (2003).
Hell, S. W. Toward fluorescence nanoscopy. Nat Biotechnol 21, 1347–1355 (2003).
Hell, S. W., Dyba, M. & Jakobs, S. Concepts for nanoscale resolution in fluorescence microscopy. Curr Opin in Neurobiol 14, 599–609 (2004).
Rankin, B. R. et al. Nanoscopy in a Living Multicellular Organism Expressing GFP. Biophys J 100, L63–L65 (2011).
Berning, S., Willig, K. I., Steffens, H., Dibaj, P. & Hell, S. W. Nanoscopy in a living mouse brain. Science 335, 551 (2012).
Göttfert, F. et al. Coaligned Dual-Channel STED Nanoscopy and Molecular Diffusion Analysis at 20 nm Resolution. Biophys J 105, L01–L03 (2013).
Hofmann, M., Eggeling, C., Jakobs, S. & Hell, S. W. Breaking the diffraction barrier in fluorescence microscopy at low light intensities by using reversibly photoswitchable proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 17565–17569 (2005).
Grotjohann, T. et al. Diffraction-unlimited all-optical imaging and writing with a photochromic GFP. Nature 478, 204–208 (2011).
Brakemann, T. et al. A reversibly photoswitchable GFP-like protein with fluorescence excitation decoupled from switching. Nat Biotechnol 29, 942–947 (2011).
Grotjohann, T. et al. rsEGFP2 enables fast RESOLFT nanoscopy of living cells. eLife 1, e00248 (2012).
Testa, I., Urban, N. T., Jakobs, S., Eggeling, C., Willig, K. I. & Hell, S. W. Nanoscopy of Living Brain Slices with Low Light Levels. Neuron 75, 992–1000 (2012).
Rego, E. H. et al. Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy with a photoswitchable protein reveals cellular structures at 50-nm resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, E135–E143 (2012).
Schnorrenberg, S. et al. In vivo super-resolution RESOLFT microscopy of Drosophila melanogaster. eLife 5, e15567 (2016).
Chmyrov, A. et al. Nanoscopy with more than 100,000 ‘doughnuts’. Nat Methods 10, 737–740 (2013).
Yang, B., Przybilla, F., Mestre, M., Trebbia, J.-B. & Lounis, B. Large parallelization of STED nanoscopy using optical lattices. Opt Express 22, 5581–5589 (2014).
Bergermann, F., Alber, L., Sahl, S. J., Engelhardt, J. & Hell, S. W. 2000-fold parallelized dual-colour STED fluorescence nanoscopy. Opt Express 23, 211–223 (2015).
Bourgeois, D. & Adam, V. Reversible photoswitching in fluorescent proteins: A mechanistic view. IUBMB Life 64, 482–491 (2012).
Jensen, N. A. et al. Coordinate-Targeted and Coordinate-Stochastic Super-Resolution Microscopy with Reversibly Switchable Fluorescent Protein Dreiklang. ChemPhysChem 15, 756–762 (2014).
Stiel, A. C. et al. Generation of Monomeric Reversibly Switchable Red Fluorescent Proteins for Far-Field Fluorescence Nanoscopy. Biophys J 95, 2989–2997 (2008).
Lavoie-Cardinal, F. et al. Two-Colour RESOLFT Nanoscopy with Green and Red Fluorescent Photochromic Proteins. ChemPhysChem 15, 655–653 (2014).
Gustafsson, M. G. L. et al. Three-Dimensional Resolution Doubling in Wide-Field Fluorescence Microscopy by Structured Illumination. Biophys J 94, 4957–4970 (2008).
Leutenegger, M., Rao, R., Leitgeb, R. A. & Lasser, T. Fast focus field calculations. Opt. Express 14, 11277–11291 (2006).
Vandenberg, W., Leutenegger, M., Lasser, T., Hofkens, J. & Dedecker, P. Diffraction-unlimited imaging: from pretty pictures to hard numbers. Cell Tissue Res. 360, 151–178 (2015).
Leutenegger, M. & Lasser, T. Detection efficiency in total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Opt. Express 16, 8519–8531 (2008).
Tiwari, D. K. et al. A fast- and positively photoswitchable fluorescent protein for ultralow-laser-power RESOLFT nanoscopy. Nat Methods 12, 515–518 (2015).
Duwé, S., De Zitter, E., Gielen, V., Moeyaert, B., Vandenberg, W., Grotjohann, T., Clays, K., Jakobs, S., Van Meervelt, L. & Dedecker, P. Expression-Enhanced Fluorescent Proteins Based on Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein for Super-resolution Microscopy. ACS Nano 9, 9528–9541 (2015).
El Khatib, M., Martins, A., Bourgeois, D., Colletier, J.-P. & Adam, V. Rational design of ultrastable and reversibly photoswitchable fluorescent proteins for super-resolution imaging of the bacterial periplasm. Sci. Rep. 6, 18459 (2016).
We acknowledge funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the project Ultraschnelle RESOLFT-Mikroskopie (VideoRES) (FKZ: 13N12993, 13N12995).
A.S., L.K., G.D. and S.W.H. have personal financial interest (ownership) in Abberior Instruments GmbH,Germany. A.C. was employed by this company during this project, T.G. is now employed by this company. The concepts demonstrated in this publication find application in commercially available microscope systems.
About this article
Cite this article
Chmyrov, A., Leutenegger, M., Grotjohann, T. et al. Achromatic light patterning and improved image reconstruction for parallelized RESOLFT nanoscopy. Sci Rep 7, 44619 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44619
Nature Cell Biology (2019)
Nature Communications (2018)
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2017)