Mounting evidence suggests that natural microbial communities exhibit a high level of spatial organization at the micrometric scale that facilitate ecological interactions and support biogeochemical cycles. Microbial patterns are difficult to study definitively in natural environments due to complex biodiversity, observability and variable physicochemical factors. Here, we examine how trophic dependencies give rise to self-organized spatial patterns of a well-defined bacterial consortium grown on hydrated surfaces. The model consortium consisted of two Pseudomonas putida mutant strains that can fully degrade the aromatic hydrocarbon toluene. We demonstrated that obligate cooperation in toluene degradation (cooperative mutualism) favored convergence of 1:1 partner ratio and strong intermixing at the microscale (10–100 μm). In contrast, competition for benzoate, a compound degraded independently by both strains, led to distinct segregation patterns. Emergence of a persistent spatial pattern has been predicted for surface attached microbial activity in liquid films that mediate diffusive exchanges while permitting limited cell movement (colony expansion). This study of a simple microbial consortium offers mechanistic glimpses into the rules governing the assembly and functioning of complex sessile communities, and points to general principles of spatial organization with potential applications for natural and engineered microbial systems.
In most natural environments, microorganisms form complex sessile communities (e.g., biofilms, granules) comprised of multiple interacting species1,2,3,4. Communities colonizing surfaces (particles, pore surfaces, etc.) typically show spatial patterns of organization that manifest at the microscale (10–1000 μm) and that might be instrumental for their metabolic activity1,5,6,7,8. Structural patterns are thought to be non-random but rather contingent on trophic preferences and interdependencies of the species forming the community1,9. For sessile microorganisms, the characteristic lengths separating cells are sufficiently small for effective diffusive exchange of metabolites, thereby promoting stable and complex trophic interactions not possible in well-mixed cultures10,11,12,13. Spatial patterns of organization are characteristic of soil microorganisms14,15,16,17,18, which inhabit complex pore spaces and rely largely on diffusion through thin aqueous films that also constrain their dispersal ranges and access to nutrients19,20,21,22. As a consequence soil microorganisms are associated with spatial ‘hotspots’ and temporal ‘hot moments’15,17,23,24 of biogeochemical activity manifested at scales ranging from soil profiles to the globe (e.g., greenhouse gas emissions, ecosystem services)25,26,27,28. The study of microbial spatial patterns in soil, however, is inherently difficult due to the phylogenetic complexity of communities, uncontrolled dynamic conditions, observational constraints of opaque soil components, and experimental sampling scales that are often larger than the scales of trophic interactions. For these reasons, and despite the ubiquity and apparent importance of microbial sessile structures in most environments, our understanding of the mechanisms governing the spatial assembly and functioning of consortia remains limited. However, it is expected that microbial patterns emerge from local trophic interactions between individuals of varied genotypes in a spatially heterogeneous environment12,29. In this study, we systematically evaluate the role of trophic interactions, availability of nutrients and byproducts, spatial positioning, and hydration conditions on microbial self-organization on surfaces. To circumvent experimental limitations, we selected a model bacterial consortium consisting of two strains of the soil organism Pseudomonas putida and that exhibits obligate mutualistic interaction in degrading toluene and using it as carbon source (i.e. cooperative mutualism30). We observed and quantified spatial patterns on homogeneous surfaces (agar plates) and heterogeneous surfaces (porous rough surfaces under defined hydration conditions), with carbon sources inducing cooperation or competition, and we examined the combined role of physicochemical factors that pertain to environmental microhabitats. Our results showed that cooperation increases proximity between partners colonizing a surface, thus resulting in emergent spatial patterns that are distinct from competition patterns. The emergence of cooperative spatial patterns is contingent on surface attachment and manifested through consortium expansion from a well-mixed area. The pattern was modulated by surface geometry, hydration conditions, initial ratio of partners and the addition of alternate carbon sources. The study demonstrated how different types of trophic interactions and physicochemical factors give rise to formation of functional spatial patterns relevant to microbial ecology in complex environmental systems.
Cooperative mutualism in toluene-degrading consortium
We assembled a two-member bacterial consortium to study cooperation in carbon source degradation and subsequent growth. The consortium strains derived from Pseudomonas putida F1 (PpF1), a soil bacterium which can use the hydrocarbon toluene as sole carbon and energy source31. Unlike PpF1, derivative mutant strains PpF4 and PpF107 cannot grow with toluene32. The toluene degradation pathway in PpF1 involves a series of enzymatic reactions described in Fig. 1; the genes encoding these enzymes, organized as an operon, are located in a genomic island on PpF1’s chromosome33. Strains PpF4 and PpF107 respectively show impaired activity of enzymes toluene 2,3-dioxygenase and catechol 2,3-dioxygenase, and consequently possess incomplete, but complementary, toluene degradation pathways (Fig. 1a). We have shown that, when paired and in presence of toluene, the complementary strains PpF4 and PpF107 acted as a cross-feeding consortium, therefore reinstating the PpF1 phenotype (i.e., ability to grow with toluene as sole carbon source) on solid and in liquid media (Fig. 1b,c). Strain PpF107 grown on arginine and toluene was previously shown to accumulate 3-methylcatechol in the culture supernatant32,34, which can be used by PpF4 as carbon source. It is not clear, however, what metabolite(s) excreted by PpF4 was in turn used by PpF107. One possible metabolite is acetate (Fig. 1a), and we confirmed in our own experiments that PpF107 can use this compound as sole carbon source for growth in liquid culture. Both strains showed increased fitness (as measured by population growth) as a consortium compared to individual cultures which cannot grow on toluene (Supplementary Fig. S1). Thus, the trophic interaction between PpF4 and PpF107 can be defined as cooperative mutualism30 when toluene is the sole carbon source available.
Self-organization of toluene-degrading consortium on surfaces
We tagged the strains PpF4 and PpF107 with fluorescent proteins to study their spatial arrangement during radial expansion on surfaces as toluene-degrading consortium (mixed colonies). The two strains were mixed in equal fractions (1:1), which was expected to be optimal for mutualistic interaction. Consortium grown with toluene typically showed a high degree of strain intermixing, with PpF4 and PpF107 forming alternate strands perpendicular to the expanding edge of the colony (Fig. 2a–d, Supplementary Fig. S2). In addition, microscale observations revealed that a monolayer of PpF107 cells often occupied the periphery of the growing colony (Fig. 2b,c). Intermixing patterns resulted only from cell growth, division and shoving, since the agar concentration (1.4%) did not permit swimming motility. Consortium growth and strain spatial intermixing were higher when toluene was provided in gaseous form (i.e. agar plates continuously exposed to toluene-saturated air, which according to air-water partitioning coefficient would result in ≈6 mM toluene concentration) rather than supplied directly in the solid growth medium at 10 mM nominal concentration (toluene-saturated agar plates) (Fig. 2d and e). Increasing incubation time for the consortium exposed to aqueous-phase toluene had little effect on total consortium growth, however, it accentuated the formation of a PpF107 pioneering layer at the periphery of the colony (Fig. 2e). Traces of limited growth have been observed even in absence of toluene (Fig. 2f), possibly due to carbon residues present in the agar, but the detected fluorescence intensity was very faint compared to the fluorescence intensity of the consortium grown on aqueous or gaseous toluene. The observed patterns were reproduced in two independent experiments with toluene provided in the aqueous phase and at least eight independent experiments with toluene provided in the gas phase.
We hypothesized that the spatial intermixing patterns observed in the mutualistic consortium would vanish with the removal of trophic interdependency. We thus compared mutualistic patterns to patterns obtained by growing the consortium on benzoate as sole carbon source. Although chemically similar to toluene, benzoate is metabolized via a different pathway in P. putida and can be fully and independently degraded by PpF4 and PpF107. Replacing toluene with benzoate as carbon source thus resulted in exploitation competition between consortium members (i.e. competition for nutrients and space35). On agar plates containing 10 mM benzoate, consortium colonies grew faster and showed complete strain demixing (i.e., segregation of genotypes) at the colony expanding edge. Figure 3 shows exemplary images of consortium colonies grown on benzoate or on toluene. Segregation patterns observed with growth on benzoate varied among replicate colonies (see for example Supplementary Fig. S2), but the observed complete strain demixing at the expanding edge of the colony was consistently reproduced in at least five independent experiments. Importantly, benzoate consumption favored PpF4 dominance and PpF107 disappearance in the consortium (Fig. 3a), indicating that under these conditions PpF4 had a higher fitness than PpF107. This fitness discrepancy was associated with differences between the strains, not with the expression of specific autofluorescent proteins, since a mixture of green- and red-tagged PpF4 grown on benzoate did not produce asymmetrical distribution (Supplementary Fig. S3). Both PpF4 and PpF107 were able to grow exponentially in shaken liquid medium containing 10 mM benzoate, however, PpF107’s specific growth rate was approximately half of PpF4’s (Supplementary Fig. S3). The competition pressure produced by PpF4 over PpF107 when grown on benzoate could be mitigated by reducing the cell density in the inoculum (Supplementary Fig. S4).
To quantify the differences in spatial patterns, we have used image analyses of PpF4 and PpF107 fluorescence from the colony (Fig. 3c) to measure spatial alternations of the fluorescence signal using crossing statistics (see Methods). The analysis enabled estimation of the average size of single-color radial strands/patches (regions composed primarily of PpF4 or PpF107 cells) as the consortium colony expanded and segregated on an agar surface from the inoculation zone (a circle of diameter ≈2 mm). Initially, both cooperative mutualism and competition showed increase in average patch width (Fig. 3c). Under competitive growth conditions the average patch width continued to increase and populations segregated further, until the PpF4 population largely dominated the expanding edge at the expense of PpF107. At this point (starting ≈1 mm from the inoculation zone), image analysis ceased to detect patch width accurately due to the absence of ‘crossings’ (Fig. 3c, inset). By contrast, the average patch width steadily decreased with the expanding radius under mutualistic growth conditions (Fig. 3c), indicating that the highest strain intermixing occurred at the expanding edge of the colony. These expansion patterns were consistent among replicate colonies (Supplementary Fig. S2), and alternating strains showed a consistent mean patch width of 10–100 μm under mutualistic growth conditions with toluene (Supplementary Fig. S5). Intermixing patterns were altered or even abolished when the consortium was exposed to mixed carbon sources, either toluene and 3-methylcatechol, or toluene and benzoate (Supplementary Fig. S6).
Initial strain ratio affects consortium productivity on surfaces but not in liquid
We examined the role of the initial PpF4:PpF107 ratio on consortium productivity (defined as the number of colony forming units per milliliter of liquid culture, or per colony on agar surface, after a given period of incubation) and tracked cell ratio dynamics over time. In liquid cultures with toluene as sole carbon source, productivity of the consortium (with initial ratio 1:1) was less than half of the productivity of the wildtype strain PpF1 after up to 120 hours of incubation in two independent experiments. In one experiment we varied the initial PpF4:PpF107 ratio (from 9:1 to 1:9), with no notable effect on the productivity of the consortium (Fig. 4a). The relative abundance of genotypes converged to similar values in all co-cultures (PpF4 represented 58% ± 6% (SD) of the community after 72 hours) as a consequence of obligate mutualism (Fig. 4b). On agar surfaces, we measured consortium productivity as function of initial strain ratio in two independent experiments lasting respectively 48 hours and 120 hours (Fig. 4c–e). Productivity of the toluene-degrading consortium on agar plates differed from productivity in liquid in two ways. First, productivity was substantially reduced when initial PpF4:PpF107 ratio was 9:1 (Fig. 4c,d), while in contrast the initial PpF4:PpF107 ratio had little effect on growth with benzoate (Supplementary Fig. S7). Secondly, in some cases final cell counts in consortium were equal to that of wildtype PpF1 (Fig. 4d). Relative abundance of the PpF4 genotype in consortium colonies was 38% ± 14% (SD) after 48 hours and 49% ± 3% (SD) after 120 hours, indicating convergence of strain ratio to ≈1:1 over time regardless of initial strain ratio or final colony size (Fig. 4e).
Consortium assembly on porous rough surfaces with controlled hydration conditions
We further observed consortium growth and self-organization on heterogeneous and hydrated porous surfaces. We used ceramic porous surface models (PSM) with natural roughness strongly contrasting with smooth agar surfaces, and that were saturated with the growth medium22,36 (Fig. 5a–c). The PSM thus offered a heterogeneous habitat with varying aqueous phase connectivity over the surface (resembling conditions in soil and other porous media). Moreover, we controlled hydration on the PSM surface by applying a prescribed suction, which allowed us to vary the thickness and connectivity of the liquid film on the PSM and thus to expose bacteria to various hydration conditions22. We exposed the consortium to toluene (as vapor) or benzoate (in the liquid medium) to promote, respectively, mutualism or competition, as observed on agar media. Consortium degrading toluene grew better, dispersed further and showed more strain intermixing under wet, near-saturated conditions (i.e., water matric potential value of −0.5 kPa) than under drier conditions (−2 kPa) (Fig. 5d,e). These observations were confirmed in three independent experiments on PSM with various inoculum sizes and incubation periods. Areas harboring highest bacterial growth (as indicated by brighter fluorescence signal) coincided with the delineation of the inoculation area (a 2–3 mm diameter droplet), which is also where cell density was highest immediately after inoculation due to the ‘coffee-ring’ effect37 (see rectangles in Fig. 5d). Under wet conditions consortium cells were highly mixed, resulting in a white coloration in areas where cyan and magenta pseudo-colors signals overlapped whereas under dry conditions PpF4 and PpF107 cells tended to form neighbouring microcolonies with limited ability to disperse (Fig. 5d,e). Consortium growing on benzoate showed very different patterns (Fig. 5f,g, showing one of the two PSM replicates). Under wet conditions, PpF4 bacteria colonized most of the PSM surface, whereas PpF107 cells were mostly found at the center of the hydrated surface (Fig. 5f). Growth and dispersion were reduced under drier conditions (−2 kPa) and the discrepancy between the fitness of PpF4 and PpF107 was suppressed (Fig. 5f). We observed mixing of the two bacterial populations on the PSM, but segregated patches were also commonly seen (Fig. 5g). Overall consortium patterns on PSM differed from those observed on agar surfaces, but certain characteristics persisted (and more so under wet conditions), such as increased strain intermixing under mutualistic growth and demixing at the expanding bacterial front under competitive conditions.
In this study, we examined microbial spatial self-organization as function of trophic dependency using a two-member, toluene-degrading bacterial consortium. Two interacting bacterial Pseudomonas putida strains, PpF4 and PpF107, grew jointly on toluene as a consortium but not as single-strain cultures, both in liquid and on solid media, thus manifesting obligate trophic mutualism (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. S1). The ratio of PpF4 and PpF107 cells, as measured by colony-forming units, converged to 1:1 in liquid cultures and on agar media independent of the initial proportions (Fig. 4). Such ratio convergence is expected under conditions of obligate mutualistic growth38, and suggests system stability39. On agar surfaces, mutualistic growth with toluene led to specific expansion patterns with high degree strain intermixing, i.e., a structural organization that facilitates exchange of soluble metabolites (Figs 2, 3). It is known that PpF107 oxidizes toluene and releases the byproduct 3-methylcatechol32,34, which can be used as carbon source by PpF4. Since the oxidation of toluene into 3-methylcatechol yields no carbon, PpF107 likely benefits from the interaction through PpF4 byproducts (e.g., metabolic products such as acetate, which PpF107 can use as carbon source). Growth was reduced and spatial patterns differed markedly when toluene was dissolved directly in the medium rather than provided via the gas phase (Fig. 2). This is not surprising because aromatic hydrocarbons like toluene can have negative effects on bacterial growth through disruption of the structure and function of cell plasma membranes40,41. Normal bacterial growth can be sustained by providing volatile hydrocarbons via the gas phase, which reduces toluene toxicity to the cells40,42. Mutualistic expansion patterns were radically modified by replacing toluene with benzoate (while keeping all other conditions constant). Benzoate could be used independently by both members of the consortium and therefore led to a form of exploitation competition35. This change induced a total segregation between PpF4 and PpF107 populations during radial expansion on surfaces, and led progressively to the competitive exclusion of the PpF107 genotype at the edge of the colony (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. S2). It was not entirely clear whether PpF107’s reduced fitness was due only to a lower growth rate (Supplementary Fig. S3), or if PpF4 also had a direct negative effect on PpF107 (interference competition35). Both strains grew faster with benzoate than with toluene, which is also consistent with microscopic observations of cell growth and morphology (Supplementary Fig. S8). Genotypic demixing and the reduction of diversity observed at the growing radial front follow general rules associated with dispersal of microbial communities in space43. However, strong mutualistic interactions mitigate demixing and promote coexistence38,44. Spatial contingency was evident through observations that i) the initial distribution of consortium members could impact growth on surfaces, but not in liquid, and ii) some configurations of consortium members perform as well as the wildtype on surfaces (as measured by CFU counts), but not in liquid (Fig. 4). This is consistent with the view that spatial arrangement is required for the optimization of specific microbial processes, which is particularly relevant for the design of synthetic communities30,45,46. Related to this is the notion that the existence of a spatially structured habitat is a prerequisite for the evolution of mutualism from competitive ancestors44,47,48, or for the stabilization of exploitative interactions11. In our experiments with toluene we have not observed emergence of colony sectors exhibiting altered spatial growth patterns, which suggested that the conditions and time span did not select for new mutant genotypes that would enhance cooperative mutualism in the consortium. In the experiments with benzoate, we sometimes observed subpopulations of PpF107 cells that appeared to outcompete PpF4 cells at the edge of the growing colony (see for example in Fig. 3a). However, we further showed that PpF107 isolated from the edge of the colony did not compete better with PpF4 than the original PpF107 (Supplementary Fig. S9), and thus that formation of PpF107 sectors at the edge was likely due to chance only. It is possible that longer experimental time spans (weeks to months) could lead to emergence and enrichment of better adapted mutants and thus to onset of genetic drift in the consortium. Although such evolutionary questions are of interest, they are beyond the scope of the present study.
Our results demonstrated that cooperative mutualism in toluene degradation favored the emergence of strongly intermixed patterns, with width of clonal strands decreasing with radial expansion (in the range of 10 to 100 μm) suggesting persistence of the mutualistic interactions (Figs 2, 3, Supplementary Fig. S5). Similar values have been reported in a yeast two-member consortium that cross-feed on amino acids38,39, which supports the view that spatial proximity is a conserved ecological trait for metabolic cooperation between genotypes that rely on diffusion44,49. This intermixed pattern stood in stark contrast with strongly segregated patterns emerging under growth on benzoate that removed the obligate mutualistic dependency and resulted in alternating single strain bands >100 μm wide (Fig. 3). Under mutualistic growth conditions, PpF4 cells rely for their maintenance and growth on the aqueous diffusion of 3-methylcatechol (derived from toluene) from neighboring strands of PpF107 cells. Hence, minimization of diffusion distances between consumer (PpF4) and producer (PpF107) favor trophic interactions, while larger physical separation can lead to starvation. Such considerations have utmost importance for soil bacteria like P. putida, because of the non-mixed, unsaturated state of their habitat. Indeed, soil contains complex pore spaces, fragmented aquatic domains and limited nutrient diffusion fields19,50. To better understand consortium assembly on rough porous soil surfaces where the aqueous phase dynamics and connectedness could affect spatial self-organization, we employed a porous surface model (PSM) that mimics unsaturated soil surfaces, with control over surface hydration status while allowing direct microscopic observations36,51. Toluene-degrading consortium grew on the PSM (Fig. 5), but, as on agar surfaces (Fig. 3), range expansion was reduced compared to growth on benzoate. Importantly, drier conditions (i.e., lower water matric potential and hence reduced aqueous connectivity on the PSM) reduced growth and expansion for both carbon sources, which had been previously observed with Pseudomonas putida growing on PSM51. We recently showed that such relatively mild suction conditions (−2 kPa) resulted in thinner and disconnected liquid films on the PSM, constraining bacterial motility and restraining dispersal radii to ≈10 μm22. Therefore, consortium self-assembly is likely to be limited by both low cell density and low water matric potential12. Importantly, results on PSM showed how template ‘intermixed’ and ‘segregated’ patterns such as observed on agar surfaces could be modified by additional non-biological factors, in this case geometry (surface roughness) and hydration conditions. Although not explored in this study, many other physicochemical factors (temperature, salinity, pH, etc.) could possibly influence spatial patterns of organization.
The importance of trophic preferences and nutrient diffusion illustrated in this study contribute to the understanding of scales of microbial community organization and functioning in natural habitats such as soil. In particular, biophysical considerations are needed to interpret observations of microbial community distribution and activity in soil aggregates52. For instance, studies have revealed the importance of oxygen gradients25, of carbon source distribution and concentration52,53 and of aggregate pore size54 for the maintenance of stable microbial patterns and biochemical activity. These observations are best explained within a theoretical framework of microbial life in soil that encompasses physical factors (nutrient diffusion, pore geometries, water availability) and biological factors (cell motility and growth, trophic dependencies), and that is prerequisite for mechanistic understanding of microbial diversity and activity in porous media like soils55. Moreover, such a theoretical framework paves the way for hypothesis testing and predictions of microbial community structure and function in soils whose characteristics are (partially) known. For example, we would predict that steep gradients of one limiting carbon source would promote microbial self-organization and interactions in porous media under conditions that support cell motility, while the presence of abundant and complex mixtures of nutrient compounds would obviate the need for specific spatial positioning and thus suppress self-organization.
In conclusion, our study demonstrated how simple trophic dependencies directly shape spatial patterning and self-organization of bacterial populations inhabiting surfaces. Cooperative mutualism in degrading a carbon source (toluene) imposed proximity at the micrometric range, and determined the ultimate relative abundances of bacterial partners in the consortium. Such intermixing or segregated patterns represent ecological templates that potentially drive myriad metabolic functions in natural consortia (typically surface-attached in terrestrial systems). It does not follow that patterns identical to those that we see on model surfaces would necessarily be observed in natural habitats: many confounding factors such as habitat geometry or nutrient availability could constrain pattern formation. However, our results demonstrate how trophic dependencies are a determining component of microbial self-organizing processes. In addition to trophic dependencies, we pointed out the roles of cell distribution in space and hydration conditions in controlling self-assembly of mutualistic consortium confirming theoretical predictions12. This is of high relevance in unsaturated soils, where average distances between microbial foci can be high and liquid connectivity relatively low. We hypothesize that the imposed proximity between microorganisms (be it driven by trophic dependency or constrained by physical factors) is likely to be an important factor in maintaining species coexistence, horizontal genetic exchanges and in supporting biogeochemical functions. Beyond soils, elucidating links between microbial spatial arrangement and function is beneficial in the context of consortia engineering for industrial, environmental, or health purposes, where the formulation of ‘natural laws’ of microbial spatial organization would prove of great value.
Bacterial strains, plasmids and culture conditions
Pseudomonas putida F1 (PpF1) is a Gram-negative soil bacterium that can grow under aerobic conditions on toluene as sole carbon and energy source31 using the degradation pathway shown in Fig. 1. Its derivative mutants P. putida F4 (PpF4), and P. putida F107 (PpF107) show limited toluene 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO) activity and catechol 2,3-dioxygenase (C23O) activity, respectively32,33. PpF1 and mutants were routinely grown in Lysogeny Broth (LB) liquid culture at 30 °C with shaking at 280 rpm, or on LB agar plates at 30 °C. As a minimal medium we used M956 devoid of carbon source or supplemented with 10 mM sodium benzoate (Alfa Aeasar, Karlsruhe, Germany). Toluene (99.85%, Acros, Geel, Belgium), which is a volatile compound, was provided via the gas phase or directly to the medium from a stock solution in DMSO. The addition of DMSO to the medium did not appear to inhibit P. putida growth, and it was not used as a carbon source in absence of toluene or benzoate (see Supplementary Fig. S2). P. putida strains were transformed by electroporation (see Supplementary Methods) with either plasmid pMP465557 or plasmid pMP760458, constitutively expressing the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) and the red fluorescent protein mCherry, respectively. Both plasmids encode resistance to tetracycline, and this antibiotic was added to LB medium at a concentration of 10 μg/ml in precultures, but not in defined media to minimize external stresses. Plasmids pMP4655 and pMP7604 were specifically developed as bacteria-tagging tools for in situ studies (e.g., in the rhizosphere), and they have proved stable in Pseudomonas spp. in absence of antibiotic selection for many generations57,58. In our experiments, we tested plasmid stability by resuspending cells that were grown on agar plates without antibiotic, plating the cells on LB agar plates and subsequent screening of the colonies for expression of fluorescence. After 5 days of growth on toluene as sole carbon source (corresponding to approx. 18 generations), no plasmid loss was observed in strain PpF1, while rare plasmid losses (<1%) were observed in the consortium PpF4-PpF107.
Consortium growth experiments in liquid cultures and on agar plates
P. putida wildtype and mutant strains carrying pMP4655 or pMP7604 were grown overnight in LB with tetracycline (10 μg/ml). Cultures were centrifuged at 5,000 g for 3 min, the supernatant was removed, and the pellet was resuspended in one volume of phosphate buffer saline (PBS) to wash the cells. Centrifugation was repeated, the supernatant was again removed and the cells finally resuspended in one volume of PBS. The cells were then diluted in PBS in order to obtain a certain optical density at 600 nm (OD600) (from 1.0 to 0.0001, with 1.0 corresponding to a concentration of approximately 1–5 × 108CFU per ml, depending on strain and growth phase). Mutants were mixed pairwise using a 1:1 ratio (OD600). For liquid incubations, 10 ml-glass vials were filled with 4.8 ml of M9 (no carbon source) and 0.2 ml of cell suspension (pure or mixed cultures) at OD600 = 0.01. Open vials were incubated under a glass bell in the fume hood, next to a glass vial containing pure toluene. For solid surface experiments, we inoculated 0.5 to 1 μl of bacterial suspension (pure or mixed cultures) onto minimal medium (M9) agar plates (1.4% Bacto agar) that were devoid of carbon source or supplemented with sodium benzoate or toluene. Plates containing no extra carbon source were similarly incubated under a glass bell in presence of toluene vapor at room temperature. To measure colony growth, a small piece of agar under the colony was cut out with a scalpel and placed in a microcentrifuge tube. One ml of PBS was added to the tube, and the cells were resuspended by vortexing at full speed for 10 s. Viable bacteria were enumerated as CFU on LB agar plates (with or without tetracycline), using an adapted drop plate method59. Briefly, resuspended cells were serially diluted in PBS and five 10 μl-droplets per dilution were pipetted onto LB agar. We further selected dilutions with ~5–30 colonies per droplet for CFU counting.
Consortium growth experiments on porous surface model
Bacterial cell suspensions were prepared as described above for experiments in liquid cultures and on agar plates. We used an adapted porous surface model (PSM)22,36, which consisted of a porous ceramic disc of 14-mm diameter (Soilmoisture Equipment Corp., Santa Barbara, USA) hold in a PVC system and connected to a medium reservoir in a bottle (Fig. 5). The ceramic was autoclaved in its PVC holder (121 °C, 15 psi) for 20 min. Then it was immerged in liquid medium (M9) and placed in a vacuum chamber for one hour in order to fully saturate the ceramic pores. It was connected to a sterile 250 ml-bottle containing ~200 ml of M9 (supplemented or not with a carbon source) with a 100 cm Heidelberger extension line (B.Braun, Melsungen, Germany). The position of the ceramic surface relative to the liquid level in the bottle (i.e., the height of the liquid column) determined the suction applied to the PSM22. This suction resulted in a prescribed water matric potential that was calculated with the simple relation ψm = ρgh, with ψm the matric potential, ρ the density of water, g the acceleration of gravity and h the height of the liquid column60. More precisions on the PSM characteristics can be found in the original publication of Dechesne et al.36. Under sterile conditions, we inoculated the PSM surface by pipetting 0.5 to 1 μl of cell suspension onto the center of the ceramic disc, while a gentle suction was applied to absorb the droplet (≈1 min).
Fluorescence microscopy, image acquisition and image analysis
Bacteria on agar plates or PSM were visualized with a DM6000 epifluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Heerbrugg, Switzerland) using a 10X/0.30 HC PL Fluotar objective, a 40X/0.60 CORR HCX PL Fluotar objective, or a 63X/1.40 Oil HCX PL Apo (Leica Microsystems). Grayscale fluorescence images were sequentially recorded with a DFC350 FX camera (Leica Microsystems) using a L5 filter cube for eGFP (exciter: 480/40; emitter: 527/30: beamsplitter: 505) and a Y3 filter cube for mCherry (exciter: 545/25; emitter: 605/70: beamsplitter: 565) (Leica Microsystems). We used the LAS acquisition software (Leica Microsystems) to assemble multiple fields of view into an image composite (tile scan function) representing a wider area, and to overlay signals from eGFP and mCherry fluorescence (shown with pseudo-colors cyan and magenta, respectively). Settings for image acquisition (exposure times, gain value, excitation light intensity) were optimized according to sample type and filter cube, while Gamma function was always set to 1. Images shown in Fig. 2b,c were prepared as follows: fluorescent images obtained with LAS software were exported in tiff format and opened in ImageJ (imagej.nih.gov). Images were converted to 8 bit (grayscale) and brightness and contrast automatically corrected with ImageJ. Then an overlay of eGFP and mCherry signals was made using the color merge function of ImageJ, with pseudo-colors cyan and magenta attributed to eGFP and mCherry, respectively.
We used MATLAB to perform image analysis and quantification of the average patch width shown in Fig. 3. Briefly, we separately exported the assembled (tile scan) eGFP and mCherry images as grayscale tiff files, and we resized them with a coarsening factor of 8 (resampling by bicubic interpolation of 16 pixels) to reduce computation time (resizing did not modify the measured patterns). We measured fluorescence intensity (eGFP and mCherry channels separately, with grayscale intensity smoothed over ≈10 μm) along a circle of increasing radius (starting from the edge of the inoculation area). We calculated a threshold value for each radius with the MATLAB function ‘graythresh’, which uses Otsu’s thresholding method61. We subtracted this threshold to the fluorescence values and we used crossing statistics to determine the average width of clonal strands (i.e., a continuous strand with corrected fluorescence value above 0) and we plotted it as function of radial distance from the inoculation area.
How to cite this article: Tecon, R. and Or, D. Cooperation in carbon source degradation shapes spatial self-organization of microbial consortia on hydrated surfaces. Sci. Rep. 7, 43726; doi: 10.1038/srep43726 (2017).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Tolker-Nielsen, T. & Molin, S. Spatial organization of microbial biofilm communities. Microb. Ecol. 40, 75–84 (2000).
López, D., Vlamakis, H. & Kolter, R. Biofilms. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2 (2010).
Dang, H. & Lovell, C. R. Microbial surface colonization and biofilm development in marine environments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 80, 91–138 (2016).
Battin, T. J., Besemer, K., Bengtsson, M. M., Romani, A. M. & Packmann, A. I. The ecology and biogeochemistry of stream biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 251–263 (2016).
Bar-Zeev, E., Berman-Frank, I., Girshevitz, O. & Berman, T. Revised paradigm of aquatic biofilm formation facilitated by microgel transparent exopolymer particles. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 9119–9124 (2012).
Serra, D. O., Richter, A. M., Klauck, G., Mika, F. & Hengge, R. Microanatomy at cellular resolution and spatial order of physiological differentiation in a bacterial biofilm. mBio 4, e00103–13 (2013).
Mark Welch, J. L., Rossetti, B. J., Rieken, C. W., Dewhirst, F. E. & Borisy, G. G. Biogeography of a human oral microbiome at the micron scale. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E791–E800 (2016).
Gonzalez-Gil, G. & Holliger, C. Aerobic granules: Microbial landscape and architecture, stages, and practical implications. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 3433–3441 (2014).
Singer, G., Besemer, K., Schmitt-Kopplin, P., Hödl, I. & Battin, T. J. Physical heterogeneity increases biofilm resource use and its molecular diversity in stream mesocosms. PLoS ONE 5, e9988 (2010).
Nielsen, A. T., Tolker-Nielsen, T., Barken, K. B. & Molin, S. Role of commensal relationships on the spatial structure of a surface-attached microbial consortium. Environ. Microbiol. 2, 59–68 (2000).
Hansen, S. K., Rainey, P. B., Haagensen, J. A. J. & Molin, S. Evolution of species interactions in a biofilm community. Nature 445, 533–536 (2007).
Wang, G. & Or, D. Trophic interactions induce spatial self-organization of microbial consortia on rough surfaces. Sci. Rep. 4, 6757 (2014).
Cordero, O. X. & Datta, M. S. Microbial interactions and community assembly at microscales. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 31, 227–234 (2016).
Ettema, C. H. & Wardle, D. A. Spatial soil ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 177–183 (2002).
Nunan, N., Wu, K., Young, I. M., Crawford, J. W. & Ritz, K. Spatial distribution of bacterial communities and their relationships with the micro-architecture of soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 44, 203–215 (2003).
Feeney, D. S. et al. Three-dimensional microorganization of the soil–root–microbe system. Microb. Ecol. 52, 151–158 (2006).
Dechesne, A., Pallud, C. & Grundmann, G. L. In The spatial distribution of microbes in the environment(eds Rima B. Franklin & Aaron L. Mills ) 87–107 (Springer Netherlands, 2007).
Raynaud, X. & Nunan, N. Spatial ecology of bacteria at the microscale in soil. PLoS One 9, e87217 (2014).
Or, D., Smets, B. F., Wraith, J. M., Dechesne, A. & Friedman, S. P. Physical constraints affecting bacterial habitats and activity in unsaturated porous media – a review. Adv. Water Resour. 30, 1505–1527 (2007).
Wang, G. & Or, D. Aqueous films limit bacterial cell motility and colony expansion on partially saturated rough surfaces. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 1363–1373 (2010).
Vos, M., Wolf, A. B., Jennings, S. J. & Kowalchuk, G. A. Micro-scale determinants of bacterial diversity in soil. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 936–954 (2013).
Tecon, R. & Or, D. Bacterial flagellar motility on hydrated rough surfaces controlled by aqueous film thickness and connectedness. Sci. Rep. 6, 19409 (2016).
Bundt, M., Widmer, F., Pesaro, M., Zeyer, J. & Blaser, P. Preferential flow paths: Biological ‘hot spots’ in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 729–738 (2001).
Kuzyakov, Y. & Blagodatskaya, E. Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: Concept & review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 83, 184–199 (2015).
Tiedje, J. M., Sexstone, A. J., Parkin, T. B. & Revsbech, N. P. Anaerobic processes in soil. Plant Soil 76, 197–212 (1984).
Davidson, E. A., Savage, K. E. & Finzi, A. C. A big-microsite framework for soil carbon modeling. Global Change Biol. 20, 3610–3620 (2014).
Bardgett, R. D. & van der Putten, W. H. Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 515, 505–511 (2014).
Ebrahimi, A. & Or, D. Microbial community dynamics in soil aggregates shape biogeochemical gas fluxes from soil profiles – upscaling an aggregate biophysical model. Global Change Biol. 22, 3141–3156 (2016).
Nadell, C. D., Drescher, K. & Foster, K. R. Spatial structure, cooperation and competition in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 589–600 (2016).
Dolinšek, J., Goldschmidt, F. & Johnson, D. R. Synthetic microbial ecology and the dynamic interplay between microbial genotypes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. fuw024 (2016).
Finette, B. A., Subramanian, V. & Gibson, D. T. Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas putida PpF1 mutants defective in the toluene dioxygenase enzyme system. J. Bacteriol. 160, 1003–1009 (1984).
Finette, B. A. & Gibson, D. T. Initial studies on the regulation of toluene degradation by Pseudomonas putida F1. Biocat. Biotransform. 2, 29–37 (1988).
Parales, R. E., Parales, J. V., Pelletier, D. A. & Ditty, J. L. In Adv. Appl. Microbiol.Volume 64 (eds Sima Sariaslani Allen I. Laskin & M. Gadd Geoffrey ) 1–73 (Academic Press, 2008).
Hüsken, L., Beeftink, R., de Bont, J. & Wery, J. High-rate 3-methylcatechol production in Pseudomonas putida strains by means of a novel expression system. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 55, 571–577 (2001).
Little, A. E. F., Robinson, C. J., Peterson, S. B., Raffa, K. F. & Handelsman, J. Rules of engagement: Interspecies interactions that regulate microbial communities. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 62, 375–401 (2008).
Dechesne, A., Or, D., Gülez, G. & Smets, B. F. The porous surface model, a novel experimental system for online quantitative observation of microbial processes under unsaturated conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 5195–5200 (2008).
Deegan, R. D. et al. Capillary flow as the cause of ring stains from dried liquid drops. Nature 389, 827–829 (1997).
Müller, M. J. I., Neugeboren, B. I., Nelson, D. R. & Murray, A. W. Genetic drift opposes mutualism during spatial population expansion. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1037–1042 (2014).
Momeni, B., Brileya, K. A., Fields, M. W. & Shou, W. Strong inter-population cooperation leads to partner intermixing in microbial communities. eLife 2, e00230 (2013).
Sikkema, J., de Bont, J. A. & Poolman, B. Mechanisms of membrane toxicity of hydrocarbons. Microbiol. Rev. 59, 201–222 (1995).
Bordel, S., Muñoz, R., Díaz, L. F. & Villaverde, S. New insights on toluene biodegradation by Pseudomonas putida F1: Influence of pollutant concentration and excreted metabolites. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 74, 857–866 (2007).
Jenkins, R. O., Stephens, G. M. & Dalton, H. Production of toluene cis-glycol by Pseudomonas putida in glucose feb-batch culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 29, 873–883 (1987).
Hallatschek, O., Hersen, P., Ramanathan, S. & Nelson, D. R. Genetic drift at expanding frontiers promotes gene segregation. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19926–19930 (2007).
Kovács, Á. T. Impact of spatial distribution on the development of mutualism in microbes. Front. Microbiol. 5, 649 (2014).
Kim, H. J., Boedicker, J. Q., Choi, J. W. & Ismagilov, R. F. Defined spatial structure stabilizes a synthetic multispecies bacterial community. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18188–18193 (2008).
Johns, N. I., Blazejewski, T., Gomes, A. L. C. & Wang, H. H. Principles for designing synthetic microbial communities. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 31, 146–153 (2016).
Doebeli, M. & Knowlton, N. The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 8676–8680 (1998).
Hillesland, K. L. & Stahl, D. A. Rapid evolution of stability and productivity at the origin of a microbial mutualism. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2124–2129 (2010).
Hol, F. J. H. et al. Spatial structure facilitates cooperation in a social dilemma: Empirical evidence from a bacterial community. PLoS ONE 8, e77042 (2013).
Ebrahimi, A. N. & Or, D. Microbial dispersal in unsaturated porous media: Characteristics of motile bacterial cell motions in unsaturated angular pore networks. Water Resour. Res. 50, 7406–7429 (2014).
Dechesne, A., Wang, G., Gülez, G., Or, D. & Smets, B. F. Hydration-controlled bacterial motility and dispersal on surfaces. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 14369–14372 (2010).
Gupta, V. V. & Germida, J. J. Soil aggregation: Influence on microbial biomass and implications for biological processes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 80, A3–A9 (2015).
Chenu, C., Hassink, J. & Bloem, J. Short-term changes in the spatial distribution of microorganisms in soil aggregates as affected by glucose addition. Biol. Fertility Soils 34, 349–356 (2001).
Ruamps, L. S., Nunan, N. & Chenu, C. Microbial biogeography at the soil pore scale. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 280–286 (2011).
Ebrahimi, A. & Or, D. Hydration and diffusion processes shape microbial community organization and function in model soil aggregates. Water Resour. Res. 51, 9804–9827 (2015).
Sambrook, J. & Russel, D. W. Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual. 3rd edition (Cold Spring harbor, New York, 2001).
Bloemberg, G. V., Wijfjes, A. H. M., Lamers, G. E. M., Stuurman, N. & Lugtenberg, B. J. J. Simultaneous imaging of Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 populations expressing three different autofluorescent proteins in the rhizosphere: New perspectives for studying microbial communities. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 13, 1170–1176 (2000).
Lagendijk, E. L., Validov, S., Lamers, G. E. M., De Weert, S. & Bloemberg, G. V. Genetic tools for tagging gram-negative bacteria with mCherry for visualization in vitro and in natural habitats, biofilm and pathogenicity studies. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 305, 81–90 (2010).
Chen, C.-Y., Nace, G. W. & Irwin, P. L. A 6 × 6 drop plate method for simultaneous colony counting and MPN enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli . J. Microbiol. Methods 55, 475–479 (2003).
Hillel, D. Introduction to environmental soil physics(Academic press, 2003).
Otsu, N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber. 9, 62–66 (1979).
Financial support for this work came from an Advanced Grant to D.O. by the European Research Council (ERC-3200499-‘SoilLife’) and from the RTD SystemsX.ch project ‘MicroscapesX’ to D.O. We thank Becky Parales for the gift of P. putida strains, Mitja Remus-Emsermann for the gift of plasmids and Minsu Kim for help with pattern quantification.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Tecon, R., Or, D. Cooperation in carbon source degradation shapes spatial self-organization of microbial consortia on hydrated surfaces. Sci Rep 7, 43726 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43726
This article is cited by
Scientific Reports (2022)
Causes and consequences of pattern diversification in a spatially self-organizing microbial community
The ISME Journal (2021)
Exploiting geometric similarity for statistical quantification of fluorescence spatial patterns in bacterial colonies
BMC Bioinformatics (2020)
Spatial organization in microbial range expansion emerges from trophic dependencies and successful lineages
Communications Biology (2020)
Stable isotope probing and metagenomics highlight the effect of plants on uncultured phenanthrene-degrading bacterial consortium in polluted soil
The ISME Journal (2019)