Abstract
Gut microbiota dysbiosis plays a central role in the development and perpetuation of chronic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and therefore is key target for interventions with high quality and functional probiotics. The local production of stable probiotic formulations at limited cost is considered an advantage as it reduces transportation cost and time, thereby increasing the effective period at the consumer side. In the present study, we compared the anti-inflammatory capacities of the Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (B. lactis) INL1, a probiotic strain isolated in Argentina from human breast milk, with the commercial strain B. animalis subsp. lactis BB12. The impact of spray-drying, a low-cost alternative of bacterial dehydration, on the functionality of both bifidobacteria was also investigated. We showed for both bacteria that the spray-drying process did not impact on bacterial survival nor on their protective capacities against acute and chronic colitis in mice, opening future perspectives for the use of strain INL1 in populations with IBD.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic relapsing inflammatory disorder. Although the exact pathophysiology of the disease is unknown, the current paradigm is multifactorial and involves a dysregulation of the mucosal immune response towards the gut microbiota in a genetically susceptible host1. At present, effective therapeutic management of IBD is lacking: 25–30% of patients fail to respond to current biologics and/or to immunosuppressive drugs, resulting in accumulation of adverse events, including malignancies, and leading to increased levels of opportunistic infections2. Therefore new strategies for treating this disease are imperative. While the microbiota is a determinant of normal gut function and immunity, there is increasing evidence that impaired microbiota composition (dysbiosis) plays a crucial role in the onset and maintenance of active IBD3,4. Therefore targeting this dysbiosis is potentially crucial in the management of the disease.
Probiotics are defined as microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, can confer a health benefit on the host (FAO/WHO5), revisited by an expert panel of the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) in 20136. Probiotics have emerged as a new potential therapeutic strategy in IBD, notably for patients wishing to use “natural and safe” approaches. Following positive results obtained with different animal models of colitis, clinical intervention studies indeed showed beneficial activities of some probiotics in patients suffering from pouchitis or ulcerative colitis7. Their protective effects were clearly strain-depended, and several well-characterized probiotic strains failed to fulfil the expected clinical outcome, in particular in patients suffering from Crohn’s disease (CD)8. We have previously shown that protection by lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against TNBS (trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid)-induced colitis in mice was strain-specific and correlated well with the in vitro immunomodulatory properties of the strains9. Strains inducing higher levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and lower levels of the pro-Th1 cytokines IL-12 and IFNγ after in vitro stimulation of human peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMC), offered the best protection in the in vivo colitis model used. In contrast, strains inducing a low IL-10/IL-12 cytokine ratio on human PBMC’s could not significantly attenuate colitis symptoms in mice9.
Gut microbiota composition depends on dietary habits and lifestyle, and as such the microbiome composition of people from different regions can be different10. This offers local source of beneficial microbes with a decrease in the relative costs, thus particularly benefiting subpopulations in the emerging countries11. Here we evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of the strain Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (B. lactis) INL1, isolated in Argentina from human breast milk and shown before to display technological12 and functional properties in mice13,14 that make it a potential candidate for probiotic application in IBD.
An increasing demand for probiotics is challenging the industry to produce high amounts of viable cultures in stable forms15. Industrial manufacturing processes can significantly alter the structural and functional properties of live microorganisms16. While freeze-drying is most commonly used, other drying processes for microorganism preservation have been tested. Spray drying is a low-cost alternative to freeze-drying because it is relatively inexpensive and allows the production of large amounts of dried cells in a continuous process17. Particularly in Argentina, many medium to large-size dairy industries possess spray drying infrastructures, which could be exploited for the production of spray dried probiotics. However, spray drying implies somewhat harsher conditions than freeze drying, which might cause membrane damage and cell inactivation. Therefore, the feasibility to apply spray-drying to probiotics will depend on the technological conditions applied and it is anticipated that the impact on the strain functionality might be strain dependent. We thus decided to compare the anti-inflammatory capacities of the Argentinian strain B. animalis subsp. lactis (B. lactis) INL1 and B. lactis BB12, largely described as beneficial in a number of inflammatory conditions18 and study the impact of spray-drying on the anti-inflammatory functionality of both strains.
Results
The spray-drying did not decrease bacterial survival
Fresh cultures of bididobacteria were spray-dried in 20% (w/v) skim milk (constant inlet air temperature of 137.5 ± 3.5 °C, an outlet temperature of 82.5 ± 7.8 °C and a flux of 600 l/h were used). The mean value of moisture of the powders obtained after spray drying was 3.89% ± 0.09 and 4.22% ± 1.59 (wt/wt) for B. lactis INL1 and B. lactis BB12, respectively. Both B. animalis subsp. lactis strains INL1 and BB12 exhibited a satisfactory resistance capacity to spray drying, with a respective survival rate of 97.36 and 98.12% (Table 1). No significant differences in cell counts were observed before and after spray drying.
The immunomodulation capacities of B. animalis subsp. lactis INL1 and BB12 strain are similar and not affected by spray-drying
The capacity of both bifidobacterial strains to induce the release of cytokines after in vitro stimulation of human PBMC’s, was compared (Fig. 1). The cytokine profile observed for INL1 was similar to that of BB12. Indeed both strains were good inducers of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, while they induced low levels of the pro-Th1 cytokines (IL-12 and IFNγ), leading to a high IL-10/IL-12 ratio in comparison to e.g. L. acidophilus NCFM, selected for its strong capacity to induce pro-Th1 cytokines9,19. Spray drying slightly decreased their capacity to induce IL-10 but both spray-dried bifidobacteria maintained their anti-inflammatory profile as highlighted by the IL-10/IL-12 ratio which remained significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that of the pro-Th1 L. acidophilus NCFM strain.
B. lactis INL1 and BB12 strains rescued mice from acute colitis and these protective capacities were not affected by spray-drying
To compare the in vivo anti-inflammatory capacities of both INL1 and BB12 strains, we first used a well-established murine model of acute colitis (Fig. 2A), induced by TNBS (110 mg/Kg)9,20. As expected, TNBS treatment (after 48 h induction) reduced body weight (by 13%; Fig. 2B) and induced a strong colitis, highlighted both by a high macroscopic score (Wallace score of 5.9 ± 0.6, Fig. 2C) as well as a high histological score (Ameho score of 5.7 ± 0.2, Fig. 2D,E). Both fresh cultures of B. lactis INL1 and BB12 were able to significantly protect mice from colitis, as shown by a strong and significant reduction of both macroscopic (p < 0.01, Fig. 2C) and histological (p < 0.001, Fig. 2D,E) scores of inflammation, leading to a protective effect of 53.8% and 56.8%, respectively. This protective effect was not significantly affected by spray drying since both spray-dried strains were also able to reduce the macroscopic (p < 0.001 and 0.01 for INL-1 and BB12, respectively) and histological (p < 0.001) scores of inflammation, reaching 61.1% protection for INL1 (Fig. 2). The anti-inflammatory capacity of both strains, whether fresh or spray-dried, was confirmed by following the colonic mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, showing a strong and significant (p < 0.05 and 0.01) downregulation of the gene expression of all the inflammatory markers tested (CXCL2, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6) in comparison to control TNBS-treated mice. The latter, because of the TNBS treatment exhibited a strong upregulation of these pro-inflammatory genes (Fig. 3) in comparison to control healthy mice that received only skim milk but not challenged with TNBS (normalized to 1).
The anti-inflammatory capacity of fresh and spray-dried forms of B. lactis INL1 and BB12 strains was confirmed in a model of chronic colitis
The model of chronic TNBS inflammation used in this study involves the induction of a low grade, subclinical inflammatory status, mimicking the chronic nature of inflammation in IBD21. Chronic low-grade inflammation was induced in mice by the administration of 3 subclinical, but increasing doses of TNBS (Fig. 4A). This led to a moderate body weight loss (9.8% ± 2.3, Fig. 4B), decrease of colon length (7.5 ± 0.2 cm versus 9.5 ± 0.5 cm for healthy control mice, Fig. 4C), and the induction of a mild macroscopic (Wallace score of 3.1 ± 0.5; Fig. 4D) and histological (1.9 ± 0.8; Fig. 4E,F) inflammation scores, as compared to the acute colitis model. The chronic colitis model also led to a significant upregulation of inflammatory gene expressions (Fig. 5) that were, however, less severe than those observed for acute colitis (Fig. 3). As for acute colitis, both B. lactis strains were able to counteract the inflammation status, showing significant (p < 0.05 or 0.01) decrease in weight loss and macroscopic score of inflammation, significant increase (p < 0.05 or 0.01) of colon length and a slight decrease of the histological score of inflammation (Fig. 5), in comparison to TNBS-treated control animals. Both strains were also able to significantly (p < 0.05 and 0.01) decrease, with the same efficiency, the expression of pro-inflammatory genes (cxcl2, Il1b and il6). In this model we also checked the capacity of the probiotics to induce the expression of foxp3 which is a marker of regulatory T cells. We indeed observed a significant (p < 0.05) increase of the expression of this gene in all probiotic-treated animals in comparison to TNBS control mice (Fig. 5). Again, spray-dried and fresh bacteria displayed the same efficacy in counteracting chronic colitis.
Discussion
The increased understanding of the interactions between the gut microbiota and the host immune system has raised the interest towards a targeted modulation of intestinal bacterial communities as a novel potential therapy in IBD. Similar to the findings in animals, several studies showed a significant alteration of the microbiota in IBD patients22. Significantly lower counts of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii but also of bifidobacteria were found in the rectal biopsies of patients with UC, as compared to healthy patients23,24. While promising outcomes have been observed after gut microbiota modulation through probiotic supplementations in UC patients25,26,27, disappointing results were obtained for CD patients (see systematic review7). It is noteworthy that the effects are considered strain-specific and more studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanisms of action prior to their prophylactic or therapeutic use in IBD patients7,28.
The selection of probiotic strains should therefore be driven by the needs identified at the level of the host (infection, inflammation, barrier deficiency) and the in vitro and in vivo established immunological, microbiological and/or metabolic effects of the microorganisms to be considered. In the above philosophy, it is very important that further research is conducted in order to better understand the interactions between the gut microbiota and the host, in states of health as well as in states of dysbiosis. Bifidobacteria are normal residents of the human intestine, commonly found in the infant gut and particularly enriched in the intestine of breastfed infants29. Their role early in life is to promote a tolerogenic immune system in the neonate, in order to reverse the Th2 skewed immune system inherited from the pregnant mother30,31. The latter is promoted by several mechanisms, including the promotion and delivery of bifidobacteria to the newborn via breast milk32. Breast milk has shown to be a continuous source of commensal, potentially probiotic, bacteria for the infant gut. Bifidobacteria in particular are known to play a crucial role in the prevention of a variety of immune-mediated diseases such as allergy and IBD29,33.
In the present study, we thus evaluated B. animalis subsp. lactis INL1, a strain isolated from human breast milk as a potential candidate for probiotic application in patients suffering from IBD. We notably compared its anti-inflammatory capacities to the well-known probiotic strain B. lactis BB12, which is largely recognized for its probiotic properties including its anti-inflammatory capacity34. Moreover, we evaluated in both strains the impact of spray-drying process on their anti-inflammatory functionality. Spray-drying is an economically interesting process for the preparation of industrial quantities of viable microorganisms, the cost of which is only 12–20% of the cost of freeze drying35. While currently mostly used to prepare food additives, it recently received considerable interest for the production of probiotics. Preliminary experience, however, showed that the successful application of the process is strain-dependent17,36, mainly because of the high processing temperatures used17. High temperatures may potentially reduce strain viability and could lead to important variations in bacterial hydrophobicity and immunomodulation properties.
We first showed that for both strains investigated, the spray drying process in a 20% (w/v) skim milk carrier, had no deleterious impact on bacterial survival, confirming earlier observations for Bifidobacterium species, which were shown to have a high resistance to spray drying37. Moreover, we found that both B. lactis strains exhibited a similar in vitro anti-inflammatory cytokine induction profile (high IL-10 versus IL-12 ratio), and that this immunomodulation capacity was not affected by the spray-drying process. Laconelli et al.38 recently reported that the effects on cell functionality of dehydration treatment are not directly linked to cell survival, and they illustrated that each bacterial strain had a specific sensitivity to the three different drying processes used. Spray-drying performed extremely well in terms of viability and functionality, mainly because it decreased the in vitro induction of pro-inflammatory/proTh1 cytokines. In the present study with bifidobacteria, spray-drying did not significantly impact their capacity to induce IL-10 nor the pro-Th1 cytokines IL-12 and IFNγ.
The anti-inflammatory potential of both B. lactis strains was further confirmed using a standardized acute TNBS-induced colitis model9,20. Both B. lactis strains were able to rescue mice against acute colitis and were also able to limit the inflammation levels as confirmed by the strong decrease of gene expression for pro-inflammatory cytokines.
We also set up a model of chronic colitis, induced by the administration of 3 subclinical but increasing doses of TNBS. We observed an induction of low grade, subclinical inflammation, with mild macro- or microscopic damages and lower pro-inflammatory cytokine induction, as compared to the acute TNBS model. Therefore the chronic model is thought to better mimic the chronic nature of inflammation in IBD patients. Both B. lactis strains were again able to rescue mice from chronic colitis, with similar levels of protection as observed in the acute colitis model, and were also able to limit inflammation levels, as measured by cytokine gene expression. Regulatory T (Treg) cells are known to play a critical role in the control of inflammatory response. Transcriptional factor FoxP3 serves as a lineage specification factor of these cells39. In the chronic model of colitis, we showed that both B. lactis strains increased the expression of foxp3, suggesting that a desired T-regulatory cell response could be involved in the protective effect.
Importantly, the bacterial functionalities of both strains were not affected by spray-drying. Spray-dried bacteria were able to decrease the macroscopic and histologic scores of inflammation, and dampened the pro-inflammatory cytokine expression. Spray-dried bifidobacteria were also able to upregulate foxp3 gene expression at the same level as fresh cultures, indicating that spray-drying did not alleviate their immune-regulatory capacities. This confirms previous studies performed with probiotic lactobacilli which showed that spray-drying did not impact e.g. the induction of immunoglobulin A (IgA)-producing cells in mice36. Therefore spray-drying appears to be an interesting process for the stabilization of probiotic bifidobacteria.
In conclusion, these results provide further evidence of the probiotic potential of the B. lactis INL1 strain, and particularly for an application in the attenuation of gut inflammation. Moreover, since bacterial functionalities were not affected by spray-drying, this preservation process appears to be an interesting process for the stabilization of this strain. Based on our data, it can be concluded that the strain INL1 has the potential to be explored as prospective functional therapy to manage IBD. Further studies should be conducted to investigate the mechanism of action of the bacterium and to establish its clinical efficacy in well-designed double-blind placebo-controlled human trials.
Methods
Microorganisms and growth conditions
B. animalis subsp. lactis INL1, whose functional and technological properties were previously reported12,13,14, was used in this study and compared to the commercial strain B. animalis subsp. lactis BB12. L. acidophilus NCFM kindly provided by DuPontTM Danisco (Madison, WI, USA). was also grown overnight at 37 °C in de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe broth (MRS, Difco, Detroit, USA) and used as pro-Th1 control strain9. Bifidobacteria were cultured overnight at 37 °C in anaerobic condition (GENbag anaer, Biomérieux, France), in MRS supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) L-cysteine hydrochloride (Sigma), washed twice in sterile PBS and resuspended in PBS for in vitro studies and in 20% (w/v) skim milk for in vivo experiments. Spray-dried cultures were resuspended in distilled water to a 20% (w/v) of total solids, in order to have fresh and spray-dried cells resuspended in the same medium.
Spray drying in skim milk
Overnight cultures of both bifidobacteria strains in MRS broth with 0.1% (w/v) L-cysteine hydrochloride were harvested (6000 × g, 15 min, 5 °C), washed twice with PBS and re-suspended in 20% (w/v) skim milk. Cell suspensions were spray-dried on a laboratory scale spray-dryer (Buchi mini spray dryer model B290, Flawil, Switzerland). A constant inlet air temperature of 137.5 ± 3.5 °C, an outlet temperature of 82.5 ± 7.8 °C and a flux of 600 l/h were used. Cell suspensions were atomized and sprayed into the drying chamber by using a two-fluid nozzle. The product dried almost instantaneously and the residence time was negligible. Three independent replicates were performed for each strain. Spray dried powders were vacuum sealed in individual samples of 10 g. Residual moisture (% wt/wt) was determined in triplicate at 101 ± 1 °C (FIL-IDF 26 A: 199340). Cell counts of bifidobacteria were performed before and after spray drying on MRS with 0.1% (w/v) L-cysteine hydrochloride agar (37 °C, 48 h anaerobic incubation).
Bacterial enumeration
Bifidobacteria suspensions were serially diluted in PBS buffer, plated on MRS agar supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) L-cysteine hydrochloride and grown under anaerobic condition (GENbag anaer, Biomérieux, France) at 37 °C. Colonies were counted after 48 h of incubation.
In vitro immunomodulation assays
Blood samples were obtained from five healthy informed donors. All experimental protocols were approved by our institution committees (INSERM, CNRS and Institut Pasteur de Lille) in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Blood sampling from healthy informed donors were done upon approved agreement of volunteers (signed consents) by authorized staff in accordance with the abovementioned committees, i.e. (INSERM, CNRS and Institut Pasteur de Lille). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from the blood as described before9. Briefly, after Ficoll gradient centrifugation (Pharmacia, Stockholm, Sweden), mononuclear cells were collected, washed in RPMI-1640 medium (Life Technologies, Ghent, Belgium), and adjusted to 2 × 106 cells per ml in RPMI supplemented with gentamicin (150 μg/ml), glutamine (2 mM), and 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco). PBMCs (two wells per donors) were stimulated with phosphate-buffered saline or bacteria (fresh cultured or spray dried bacteria at a bacterium-to-cell ratio of 10:1) for 24 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The supernatants were collected and stored at −20 °C until cytokine measurements performed using R&D Duoset ELISA kits (R&D, Minneapolis, MN, USA). ELISA was performed in duplicate for each sample.
Experimental TNBS-induced colitis models and study design
Female BALB/c ByJ mice (7–8 weeks old) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (L’Arbresle, France) and were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. Animal experiments were performed in an accredited establishment (number A59107; animal facility of the Institut Pasteur de Lille, France) and carried out in accordance with the guidelines of laboratory animal care published by the French Ethical Committee and the rules of the European Union Normative (number 86/609/EEC). All the studies were approved by the local investigational ethics review board (Nord-Pas-de-Calais CEEA N°75, Lille, France; protocol reference numbers 192009 R). The animal experiments also complied with French legislation (Government Act 87–848) and the European Communities Amendment of Cruelty to Animals Act 1976. Before experimentation, animals were provided a one week acclimation period and were given ad libitum access to regular mouse chow and water.
A standardized murine TNBS colitis model was used to induce acute levels of inflammation in mice (Fig. 2A). Briefly, mice (n = 10 per each experimental group) were randomly co-housed in two cages per group (n = 5/cage) and the experiment started after one week acclimation. The anti-inflammatory properties of the bifidobacteria were evaluated by the intra-gastric administration of live bacteria (2 × 108 CFU of freshly cultured or spray-dried bacteria in 20% (w/v) skim milk) or 20% (w/v) skim milk alone (for the control healthy or TNBS-treated mice) once daily, for five consecutive days before colitis induction and 1 day after the TNBS administration. For acute colitis induction, mice were anesthetized and received an intrarectal administration of a 50 μl solution of the hapten reagent TNBS (Sigma-Aldrich, France) dissolved in 0.9% NaCl/ethanol (50/50 v/v) at a final concentration of 110 mg/Kg, while control healthy mice received only 50% EtOH.
The chronic model of colitis was performed by administration of 3 increasing doses of TNBS with one week interval as described in Fig. 4A (n = 10 mice per each experimental group randomly co-housed in two cages per group; n = 5/ cage). Briefly, anesthetized mice received intrarectally 50 μl solution of TNBS (Sigma-Aldrich, France) at a dose of 25 mg/Kg (day 0), 37.5 mg/Kg (day 7) and 80 mg/Kg (day 14), dissolved in 0.9% NaCl/ethanol (50/50 v/v), while control healthy mice received only 50% EtOH. The anti-inflammatory properties of the bifidobacteria were evaluated by the daily intra-gastric administration of live bacteria (2 × 108 CFU of freshly cultured or spray-dried bacteria in 20% (w/v) skim milk) or 20% (w/v) skim milk (for the TNBS control or healthy control mice) every day during all the experimental procedure (from D0 to D15).
Colons were removed at sacrifice (48 h after the last TNBS administration), washed and opened. Inflammation grading was performed blindly using the Wallace scoring method, reflecting both the intensity of inflammation and the extent of the lesions41. Protection was calculated using the following formula: 100 x [(mean score of TNBS group – mean score of experimental group)/mean score of TNBS group]. Histological analysis was carried out on May-Grünwald Giemsa stained 5 μm tissue sections from colon samples (5 sections per mice) fixed in 4% formalin, embedded in paraffin and blindly scored according to the Ameho scoring method42. For RT-PCR analysis, a part of the colon corresponding to the inflamed region was cleaned from fecal material and stored in RNA-later® buffer (Ambion, Life Technologies, Austin, TX, USA) at –80 °C until RNA extraction.
RNA extraction and qRT-PCR
Tissue samples were homogenized using Lysing Matrix D (MPbio). Total RNA was extracted using Macherey-Nagel NucleoSpin RNAII isolation kit according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. Quantity and quality of RNA were checked by nanodrop (260/280 nm, 260/230 nm). 260/280 ratio was higher than 1.95 in all samples. RNA (1 μg) was reverse-transcribed using the High capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied BiosystemsTM, Foster City, CA, USA). Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed using the Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) on the ABI-ViiA7 Real Time PCR system. The forward and reverse primers used in the study were, respectively as follows: b-actine: 5′- CTAAGGCCAACCGTGAAAAC -3′ and 5′- ACCAGAGGCATACAGGGACA-3′; il1b: 5′-TTGACGGACCCCAAAAGATG-3′ and 5′-AGAAGGTGCTCATGTCCTCA-3′; tnfa: 5′-CCCTCACACTCAGATCATCTTCTC-3′, and 5′-GGCTACAGGCTTGTCACTCG-3′; cxcl2: 5′-CAAAAGATACTGAACAAAGGCAA-3′ and 5′-TCAGGTACGATCCAGGCTTCC-3′; il6: 5′-AGCCAGAGTCCTTCAGAGAGATAC-3′ and 5′-AATTGGATGGTCTTGGTCCTTAGC-3′; foxp3: 5-TCCTTCCCAGAGTTCTTCCA-3′ and 5′-AAGTAGGCGAACATGCGAGT-3′. The 2−Δ(ΔCT) method was used to normalize gene expression levels. Relative mRNA levels (2−Δ(ΔCT)) were determined by comparing 1) the PCR cycle thresholds (Ct) for the gene of interest and the housekeeping gene Actb (ΔCt) and 2) ΔCt values for treated and healthy control animal groups (ΔΔCt).
Statistics
GraphPad Prism was employed for graph preparation and statistical evaluation. Differences between groups were assessed using ANOVA, followed by nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. Data with p value ≤ 0.05 were considered to be significant.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Burns, P. et al. Spray-drying process preserves the protective capacity of a breast milk-derived Bifidobacterium lactis strain on acute and chronic colitis in mice. Sci. Rep. 7, 43211; doi: 10.1038/srep43211 (2017).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Bouma, G. & Strober, W. The immunological and genetic basis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol 3, 521–533 (2003).
Dave, M., Purohit, T., Razonable, R. & Loftus, E. V., Jr. Opportunistic infections due to inflammatory bowel disease therapy. Inflammatory bowel diseases 20, 196–212 (2014).
Manichanh, C. et al. Reduced diversity of faecal microbiota in Crohn’s disease revealed by a metagenomic approach. Gut 55, 205–211 (2006).
Lepage, P. et al. Biodiversity of the mucosa-associated microbiota is stable along the distal digestive tract in healthy individuals and patients with IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis 11, 473–480 (2005).
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. World Health Organization [online], http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/fs_management/en/probiotics.pdf (2001).
Hill, C. et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nature reviews 11, 506–514 (2014).
Ghouri, Y. A. et al. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 7, 473–487 (2014).
Marteau, P. et al. Ineffectiveness of Lactobacillus johnsonii LA1 for prophylaxis of postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled GETAID trial. Gut 55, 842–847 (2006).
Foligne, B. et al. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo immunomodulatory properties of lactic acid bacteria. World J Gastroenterol 13, 236–243 (2007).
De Filippo, C. et al. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 14691–14696 (2010).
Sybesma, W., Kort, R. & Lee, Y. K. Locally sourced probiotics, the next opportunity for developing countries? Trends Biotechnol 33, 197–200 (2015).
Vinderola, G. et al. Preservation of functionality of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis INL1 after incorporation of freeze-dried cells into different food matrices. Food Microbiol 30, 274–280 (2012).
Zacarias, M. F., Binetti, A., Laco, M., reinheimer, J. & Vinderola, G. Preliminary technological and probiotic characterization of bifidobacteria isolated from breast milk for use in dairy products. International Dairy Journal 21, 548–555 (2011).
Zacarias, M. F., Reinheimer, J., Forzani, L., Grangette, C. & Vinderola, G. Mortality and translocation assay to study the protective capacity of Bifidobacterium lactis INL1 against Salmonella Typhimurium infection in mice. Benef Microbes 5, 427–436 (2014).
Muller, J. A., Stanton, C., Sybesma, W., Fitzgerald, G. F. & Ross, R. P. Reconstitution conditions for dried probiotic powders represent a critical step in determining cell viability. J Appl Microbiol 108, 1369–1379 (2010).
Makinen, K., Berger, B., Bel-Rhlid, R. & Ananta, E. Science and technology for the mastership of probiotic applications in food products. J Biotechnol 162, 356–365 (2012).
Gardiner, G. E. et al. Comparative survival rates of human-derived probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei and L. salivarius strains during heat treatment and spray drying. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 2605–2612 (2000).
Geier, M. S., Butler, R. N., Giffard, P. M. & Howarth, G. S. Lactobacillus fermentum BR11, a potential new probiotic, alleviates symptoms of colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) in rats. Int J Food Microbiol 114, 267–274 (2007).
Foligne, B. et al. A key role of dendritic cells in probiotic functionality. PLoS ONE 2, e313 (2007).
Foligne, B. et al. Recommendations for improved use of the murine TNBS-induced colitis model in evaluating anti-inflammatory properties of lactic acid bacteria: technical and microbiological aspects. Dig. Dis. Sci. 51, 394–404 (2006).
Moss, A. C. The meaning of low-grade inflammation in clinically quiescent inflammatory bowel disease. Current opinion in gastroenterology 30, 365–369 (2014).
Sokol, H. et al. Low counts of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in colitis microbiota. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15, 1183–1189 (2009).
Gueimonde, M., Ouwehand, A., Huhtinen, H., Salminen, E. & Salminen, S. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the bifidobacterial microbiota in the colonic mucosa of patients with colorectal cancer, diverticulitis and inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 13, 3985–3989 (2007).
Sokol, H. et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 16731–16736 (2008).
Gionchetti, P. et al. Oral bacteriotherapy as maintenance treatment in patients with chronic pouchitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 119, 305–309 (2000).
Guslandi, M., Giollo, P. & Testoni, P. A. A pilot trial of Saccharomyces boulardii in ulcerative colitis. European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology 15, 697–698 (2003).
Tursi, A. et al. Treatment of relapsing mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis with the probiotic VSL#3 as adjunctive to a standard pharmaceutical treatment: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. The American journal of gastroenterology 105, 2218–2227 (2010).
Saez-Lara, M. J., Gomez-Llorente, C., Plaza-Diaz, J. & Gil, A. The role of probiotic lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria in the prevention and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and other related diseases: a systematic review of randomized human clinical trials. BioMed research international 2015, 505878 (2015).
Martin, R. et al. Isolation of bifidobacteria from breast milk and assessment of the bifidobacterial population by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and quantitative real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 75, 965–969 (2009).
Fernandez, L. et al. The human milk microbiota: origin and potential roles in health and disease. Pharmacol Res 69, 1–10 (2013).
Prescott, S. L. et al. Transplacental priming of the human immune system to environmental allergens: universal skewing of initial T cell responses toward the Th2 cytokine profile. J Immunol 160, 4730–4737 (1998).
Gueimonde, M., Laitinen, K., Salminen, S. & Isolauri, E. Breast milk: a source of bifidobacteria for infant gut development and maturation? Neonatology 92, 64–66 (2007).
Klement, E., Cohen, R. V., Boxman, J., Joseph, A. & Reif, S. Breastfeeding and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis. The American journal of clinical nutrition 80, 1342–1352 (2004).
Wildt, S., Nordgaard, I., Hansen, U., Brockmann, E. & Rumessen, J. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial with Lactobacillus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 for maintenance of remission un ulcerative colitis. J Crohn’s colitis 5, 115–121 (2011).
Peighambardoust, S., Golshan, A. & Hesari, J. Application of spray drying for preservation of lactic acid starter cultures: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 22, 215–224 (2011).
Paez, R. et al. Study of the effects of spray-drying on the functionality of probiotic lactobacilli. The Journal of dairy research 66, 155–161 (2013).
Simpson, P. J., Stanton, C., Fitzgerald, G. F. & Ross, R. P. Intrinsic tolerance of Bifidobacterium species to heat and oxygen and survival following spray drying and storage. J Appl Microbiol 99, 493–501 (2005).
Laconelli, C. et al. Drying process strongly affects probiotics viability and functionalities. J Biotechnol 214, 17–26 (2015).
Rudensky, A. Y. Regulatory T cells and Foxp3. Immunological reviews 241, 260–268 (2011).
IDF26A Dried milk and dried cream, determination of water content. (1993).
Wallace, J. L., MacNaughton, W. K., Morris, G. P. & Beck, P. L. Inhibition of leukotriene synthesis markedly accelerates healing in a rat model of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 96, 29–36 (1989).
Ameho, C. K. et al. Prophylactic effect of dietary glutamine supplementation on interleukin 8 and tumour necrosis factor alpha production in trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid induced colitis. Gut 41, 487–493 (1997).
Acknowledgements
The present study was funded by an international collaboration project CNRS (France)-CONICET (Argentina) No. 984/13, the Institut Pasteur de Lille, the “Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale” (Inserm) and the “Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique” (CNRS). P. Burns received also a postdoctoral grant from the Bernardo Houssay program. The authors thank Véronique Peucelle (CIIL) for her technical help in animal experimentation. We are also grateful to the staff of the animal facility of the Institut Pasteur de Lille and the BioImaging Center of Lille.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.G. and P. Burns designed the study, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. R.P. was responsible for the spray drying treatments and for the optimization of the drying process. C.G., P.B., J.H. and D.B. contributed to animal experiments. P.B., J.A. and G.V. did histology, immunohistochemistry, Q-PCR, ELISA and statistical analysis. J.R., G.V. and B. Pot participated to the writing of the manuscript and scientific discussions. C.G. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to data and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Burns, P., Alard, J., Hrdỳ, J. et al. Spray-drying process preserves the protective capacity of a breast milk-derived Bifidobacterium lactis strain on acute and chronic colitis in mice. Sci Rep 7, 43211 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43211
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43211
This article is cited by
-
Targeted Delivery of Probiotics: Perspectives on Research and Commercialization
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins (2022)
-
Safety, functional properties and technological performance in whey-based media of probiotic candidates from human breast milk
International Microbiology (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.