CuMnOS Nanoflowers with Different Cu+/Cu2+ Ratios for the CO2-to-CH3OH and the CH3OH-to-H2 Redox Reactions

A conservative CO2-Methanol (CH3OH) regeneration cycle, to capture and reutilize the greenhouse gas of CO2 by aqueous hydrogenation for industry-useful CH3OH and to convert aqueous CH3OH solution by dehydrogenation for the clean energy of hydrogen (H2), is demonstrated at normal temperature and pressure (NTP) with two kinds of CuMnOS nanoflower catalysts. The [Cu+]-high CuMnOS led to a CH3OH yield of 21.1 mmol·g−1catal.·h−1 in the CuMnOS-CO2-H2O system and the other [Cu+]-low one had a H2 yield of 7.65 mmol·g−1catal.·h−1 in the CuMnOS-CH3OH-H2O system. The successful redox reactions at NTP rely on active lattice oxygen of CuMnOS catalysts and its charge (hole or electron) transfer ability between Cu+ and Cu2+. The CO2-hydrogenated CH3OH in aqueous solution is not only a fuel but also an ideal liquid hydrogen storage system for transportation application.

Scientific RepoRts | 7:41194 | DOI: 10.1038/srep41194 electrical, and photo energies is not impossible to occur. Here, we demonstrate two kinds of inorganic CuMnOS catalysts with low cost: the [Cu + ]-high CuMnOS acts as catalyst to accelerate the reduction reaction of the CO 2 hydrogenation to methanol and the [Cu + ]-low CuMnOS to speed up the oxidation reaction of the methanol dehydrogenation into hydrogen and carbon dioxide, to complete the conservative CO 2 -CH 3 OH cycle at normal temperature and pressure without additional reagents.

Synthesis of CuMnOS.
To prepare CuMnOS powder, 1.5 g thioacetamide (CH 3 CSNH 2 ) was added into a 500 ml solution with cupric nitrate (Cu(NO 3 ) 2 ·2.5H 2 O) and manganese (II) chloride (MnCl 2 ) in the weight ratio of 1: 1, followed by 30 min stirring. Then the mixture solution was steadily heated to 95 °C and 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 ml hydrazine (N 2 H 4 ) were added to prepare the powders at different redox conditions. After stirring for 2 h, the precipitates were collected after centrifugation and washing procedures. The precipitates were dried in oven at 80 °C for 24 h. The obtained catalysts were labeled as CuMnOS-0, CuMnOS-1, CuMnOS-2, CuMnOS-3, and CuMnOS-4, depending upon their N 2 H 4 content. For comparative purpose, the CuOS was prepared at the same procedure without adding MnCl 2 .
Characterization of CuMnOS. The photoelectron spectrometry (XPS) was proceeded with VG Scientific ESCALAB 250 XPS under the Al Kα X-rays (hv = 1486.6 eV) radiation and calibrated with carbon C1s (Ea = 284.62 eV). The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) study was conducted on Bruker D2 phaser X-ray diffractometry at 10 kV using Cu Kα radiation at a scanning step size of 0.05° and with residence time of 0.5 min. SEM images were obtained from JSM-7610F field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) operated at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. A Tecnai F20 G2 instrument was used to obtain the TEM images and microstructural information. To obtain the specific surface area (S BET ), N 2 adsorption-desorption experiments were performed on Micromeritics ASAP 2020 porosity and specific surface area analyzer after the sample degassed at 150 °C for 2 h. UV-Vis DRS was evaluated on a JASCD V-670 UV-Vis spectrophotometer with an integrating sphere of 60 mm and BaSO 4 as a reference material. Photoluminescence (PL) emission spectrum was measured at room temperature on JASCD FB-8500 fluorescence spectrophotometer with a laser beam at 330 nm emission wavelength.

Reduction/hydrogenation reactions. Reduction of Cr(VI) by the catalytic reduction reaction of
CuMnOS. To execute the reduction of Cr(VI), the 50 mg catalyst was added into the reactor filled with 100 mL Cr(VI) solution of 50 mg/L. The reactor also was wrapped with aluminum foil. After reaction for 2 min, approximately 8 mL sample was taken out and passed through a 0.45 μ m membrane filter syringe to immediately separate catalysts from the solution. The diphenycarbazide (DPC) colorimetric method 22 with JASCD V-670 spectrophotometer and the ion chromatography (IC) method with Thermo ICS-5000 spectrophotometer were used to determine the Cr(VI) concentration in filtrate. To evaluate the reusability, the catalysts after the first run were re-used for the second run at the same condition after re-filling with a fresh Cr(VI) solution without being washed. For this reusability purpose, a larger amount of 50 mg catalyst was used to avoid the larger deviation caused by the weight loss.
Reduction conversion of CO 2 by aqueous hydrogenation with CuMnOS catalyst. Reduction conversion of CO 2 to CH 3 OH with CuMnOS was carried out in a home-made and jacketed quartz reactor wrapped by aluminum foil. For each run, the 0.1 g catalyst was added into the reactor with 70 mL distilled water, then CO 2 gas, released from NaHCO 3 solution by controlling the addition of dilute HNO 3 aqueous solution, was passed into the reactor under the ambient laboratory condition. The whole procedure lasted for 18 h. The products were collected and analyzed by GC with flame ionization detector (FID).

Oxidation/dehydrogenation reactions. Degradation of methylene blue by dye oxidation reaction with
CuMnOS catalyst. To proceed the MB degradation experiments, the 25 mg catalyst was added into the reactor filled with 100 mL MB solution of 10 mg/L. The reactor was wrapped with aluminum foil to exclude the effects of UV and visible light irradiations. The 3 mL sample was taken out from the reactor every 5 min, followed by instant centrifugation in 1 min. The supernatant absorbance was measured with a JASCD V-670 UV-Vis spectrophotometer for peak located at 663 nm. Their concentration was calculated based on the Lambert-Beer law. To evaluate the reusability, the catalysts after the first run were re-used for the second run at the same condition after re-filling with a fresh MB solution without being washed.
Hydrogen generation by catalytic dehydrogenation (aqueous oxidation) with CuMnOS. Hydrogen generation was conducted in a home-made and jacketed quartz reactor equipped with the input and output valves to control the gas flow. To exclude the visible light irradiation, the reactor was wrapped by aluminum foil. One CuMnOS sample was compared by exposure under the 150 W Halogen lamp illumination. The input valve was connected to a gas tank of 99.99% Ar and the output one to a well-callibrated gas chromatography (GC) with thermal conduction detector (TCD) system. The hydrogen evolution experiment was carried out with the well-dispersed 225 mg catalyst in 450 mL pure ethanol (C 2 H 5 OH), water, ethanoic acid, or the methanol (CH 3 OH), ethanol, or ethanoic acid aqueous solution (20% v/v). The gas sampling was taken for each time interval of 20 min. Gas sampling was conducted by flowing Ar gas through the reactor to GC-TCD system for several minutes. A hydrogen calibration line was built to quantitatively measure the H 2 generation rate.

Results
XPS analysis. The compositions of CuMnOS-0 and CuMnOS-3 are listed in Table 1  The substitutional Mn has a Mn/(Mn + Cu) molar ratio of ~0.038, a much lower content than the Cu content. Figure 1a shows the high resolution Cu2p XPS spectra of CuMnOS-0 and CuMnOS-3. The asymmetric Cu2p peaks were contributed to the different chemical states of Cu in CuMnOS. The peak separation of 20.0 eV between Cu2p3/2 and Cu2p1/2 located at 933.8 eV and 953.8 eV, respectively, indicates that copper is for the monovalent Cu + 23 . The peaks of 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 located at 935.0 eV and 955.3 eV, respectively, were attributed to the spin-orbit splitting of the bivalent Cu 2+ 24,25 . According to the quantitative analysis by integrating the peak area, both of catalysts are richer in Cu + than Cu 2+ and the Cu + /Cu 2+ molar ratios were calculated to be 1.49 for CuMnOS-0 and 2.39 for CuMnOS-3. With increasing the reducing N 2 H 4 content, the Cu + /Cu 2+ molar ratio increased or the Cu 2+ → Cu + transition was accelerated. CuMnOS-0 without adding N 2 H 4 has a lower Cu + content and it is labeled as [Cu + ]-low CuMnOS. CuMnOS-3 had a higher Cu + content after adding N 2 H 4 during the preparation stage and it is labeled as [Cu + ]-high CuMnOS. Figure 1b shows the high resolution Mn2p XPS spectra of CuMnOS-0 and CuMnOS-3. The peak separation of 11.5 eV between Mn2p3/2 and Mn2p1/2 located at 640.0 eV and 651.5 eV, respectively, indicates that copper is for the bivalent Mn 2+ 26,27 . Figure 1c shows the high resolution O1s XPS spectra of CuMnOS. The asymmetric O1s peak was convoluted into three kinds of peaks at 531.4 eV contributing from the hydroxyl oxygen 28 , at 530.5 eV from the Mn-O and monovalent Cu + -O 29,30 , and 529.7 eV from the bivalent Cu 2+ -O 31 . Figure 1d shows the high resolution S2p XPS spectra of CuMnOS. The S2p peaks at 163.6 eV belongs to the S 2-32, 33   CuMnOS-0 has a lower S 6+ content and [Cu + ]-high CuMnOS-3 a higher one. The Cu + content is proportional to the S 6+ content in CuMnOS. The lattice O −2 /S −2 molar ratio, removing the contribution from the hydroxyl oxygen, is ~0.466 for both of catalysts with a slightly higher S 2ratio.
XRD analysis. Figure Figure 3a shows the FE-SEM images of CuMnOS-3. CuMnOS looks like the petal-gathered nanoflower particles with its size of 300~500 nm. Similar to CuMnOS-3 in FE-SEM image, CuMnOS-0 was not displayed. Figure 3b shows the TEM image of CuMnOS to further verify its nanoflower-like microstructure. The inset in Fig. 3b shows the image at higher magnification. Figure 3c shows the HR-TEM image of CuMnOS. Different lattice fringes belonging to different grains were observed, indicating the nature of nanoparticles. Figure 3d shows the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of CuMnOS-3. The ring patterns from the (102), (103), (110) and (203) planes explain its polycrystalline nature. The scattered ring pattern explains the solid solution nature of CuMnOS. Figure 3e gives the HAADF-STEM image, which reveals many pores with different sizes inside the nanoflower-like CuMnOS particles. Figure 3f shows the FE-SEM-EDS spectrum, which verifies that aggregates are composed of Cu, Mn, S, and O. Figure 3g-j show the HAADF-STEM-EDX elemental maps of Cu, Mn, O, and S. From these element mappings, we can confirm the composition uniformity in samples.

UV-Vis absorption and photoluminescence. The optical absorption property of CuMnOS was charac-
terized by UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy. CuMnOS had a better visible light absorbance than CuOS. From the UV-Vis spectra, the direct band gap was measured with the equation versus photon energy (hν) 35 : where α is the absorbance coefficient, h the Planck constant, k the absorption constant for a direct transition, hν the absorption energy, and E g the band gap. Figure 4a shows the (α hν) 2 -hν curves of CuMnOS together with the comparative CuOS. The E g values were determined to be 2.0 eV for CuOS and 1.5~1.6 eV for CuMnOS with the higher value at the higher Cu + content in CuMnOS. The variation of energy band gap further indicates that CuMnOS is a bimetal oxysulfide solid solution instead of monocrystalline CuO with band gap of E g = 1.  Figure 4b shows PL spectra of the CuMnOS catalysts. Under a laser beam at wavelength of 330 nm, catalysts were excited with PL spectra at about 593 nm. The peak at 660 nm is originated from the laser contribution. It is observed that the 593 nm peak intensity increases with the N 2 H 4 -adding content or the Cu + content. The more Cu + content in CuMnOS-3 can contribute the more defect levels to lead to the higher emission intensity.
BET and pore size analyses. Figure 5a shows the N 2 adsorption-desorption isotherm of CuMnOS, which displays the type IV isotherm with the hysteresis loop at relative pressure (P/P 0 ) between 0.75 and 1.0, indicating its mesoporous feature 36 . Figure 5b shows the pore size distribution of CuMnOS. CuMnOS-0 and CuMnOS-3 had the surface area (S BET ) of 20.3 and 18.6 m 2 /g, the total pore volumes of 0.151 and 0.141 cm 3 /g, and the average pore diameters of 30.5 and 30.4 nm, respectively. The large pore diameter is attributed to the aggregation of the petal-gathered nanoflower particles.   Reduction activity of CuMnOS on Cr(VI). Table 2 shows the reduction of Cr(VI) over CuMnOS and CuOS catalysts in the dark. The different CuMnOS catalysts performed differently in Cr(VI) reduction with the efficiency in the order: CuMnOS-4 ≈ CuMnOS-3 > CuMnOS-2 > CuMnOS-1 > CuMnOS-0 > CuOS. The CuMnOS-3 and CuMnOS-4 catalysts completed the Cr(VI) reduction in 2 min, while CuOS only completed 8.5%. As tested by IC method, the Cr(VI) in solution was confirmed to be reduced to Cr 0 without the existence of Cr 3+ . In order to test the catalytic capability and their reusability, CuMnOS was continuously tested for three runs. After the 3 rd run, the CuMnOS-3 still maintained the good catalytic activity to reduce more than 97.4% of Cr(VI). The results indicate that the bimetal [Cu + ]-high CuMnOS oxysulfide catalysts prepared with a higher N 2 H 4 amount show excellent catalytic activity without the needs of other chemicals and photo energy. The [Cu + ]-high CuMnOS is promising for industrial applications in Cr(VI) waste water treatment.
The experimental methods for Cr(VI) depollution include photocatalysis and absorption with high surface energy nanomaterials. As the rate constant is affected by the catalyst amount, illumination light intensity etc., the quantity of K 2 Cr 2 O 7 amount (mg) divided by catalyst amount (mg), i.e. W 2,(K2Cr2O7) /W 1,(catalyst) , is used for comparison. Under the UV light, TiO 2 -CNT with a W 2 /W 1 value of 0.013 reduced 100% Cr(VI) in 40 min 37 Table 3 shows the yields of CH 3 OH in conversion of CO 2 over CuMnOS and CuOS. It is interesting to note that pure CuOS did not produce CH 3 OH. However, the aqueous hydrogenation of CO 2 by CuMnOS to produce CH 3 OH with the yield in the order: CuMnOS-3 > CuMnOS-2 > CuMnOS-1 > CuMnOS-4 > CuMnOS-0. The CH 3 OH yield increased with the Cu + content in CuMnOS but reached the highest yield of 21.1 mmol·g −1 catal.·h −1 at CuMnOS-3. The [Cu + ]-high CuMnOS favors the aqueous hydrogenation of CO 2 . In the industrial scale, thermal conversion above 200 °C had a rate above 60 mmol·g − 1 catal.·h −1 40 . For photo conversion, the maximal rate of 0.51 mmol·g −1 catal.·h −1 was achieved by the Cu-CeO 2 system with the 250 W Xe lamp 10 . Our production in the dark with a rate of 21.1 mmol·g −1 catal.·h −1 is quite promising. Figure 6 shows the degradation of MB over different catalysts in the dark. It is noted that N 2 H 4 added in processing has an important effect for preparing CuMnOS on the degradation of MB with the efficiency in the order: CuMnOS-0 ≈ CuMnOS-1 > CuMnOS -2 > CuMnOS-3 > CuMnOS-4. CuMnOS-0 and CuMnOS-1 could completely degrade MB in 5 min. However, the CuOS catalyst only removed 9.9% MB in 30 min. In order to test the catalyst reusability, the supernatant of CuMnOS-0 catalyst after the first test and gravity setting was decanted and then the fresh 100 mL MB solution of 10 ppm was added for the reuse test in the dark without washing catalysts. The 2 nd run was also completed in   Hydrogen production by aqueous CH 3 OH dehydrogenation. The results of hydrogen production by aqueous CH 3 OH dehydrogenation with the CuMnOS catalysts prepared at different N 2 H 4 contents are shown in Table 4. It is interesting to mention that the catalyst in each pure H 2 O, alcohol, and organic acid did not generate hydrogen, but the aqueous solutions of alcohol and organic acid produced H 2 at NTP in the dark. For the mixture solution of alcohol and organic acid without water, it did not work out for H 2 generation, either. These results indicate that hydrogen generation process involves the catalytic reactions with water and alcohol, or water and organic acid. The reaction between catalyst and water is especially critical. Without the existence of water to participate, hydrogen does not produce. From Table 4 7 . Without the precious metal, the H 2 production rate is low. Our CuMnOS-1 with a rate of 9.45 mmol·g −1 catal.·h −1 in the dark is encouraging.

Discussion
The developments of the pure electron-transport catalyst for reduction/hydrogenation of CO 2 into methanol and the pure hole-transport one for oxidation/dehydrogenation of aqueous alcohol into H 2 without the thermal, electrical, and photo energies are our major goals. We adopt the hexavalent Cr reduction and dye degradation for screening the redox capability during our search for catalysts. Compared with the reported redox reactions for the pollutant removal, our catalytic reactions are pretty fast at NTP. To further test the redox capability with our CuMnOS system, aqueous CO 2 hydrogenation is used for testing the catalytic reduction reaction and aqueous CH 3 OH dehydrogenation for oxidation one. The first evidence for the success in the hydrogenation-dehydrogenation redox reactions is the content of the different Cu charge states. The [Cu + ]-high CuMnOS is used and good for CO 2 reduction, therefore it can transport electrons through the Cu + /Cu 2+ charge centers for the solution/catalyst interface reaction. The [Cu + ]-low CuMnOS is used for aqueous CH 3 OH dehydrogenation, therefore it can transport holes through the Cu + /Cu 2+ charge centers.
For CH 3 OH generation from the simple CuMnOS-CO 2 -H 2 O system, the formation of proton is needed, followed by the reaction with CO 2 for forming CH 3 OH. For H 2 generation from the simple CuMnOS-CH 3 OH-H 2 O system at NTP, it needs any one of CH 3 OH, H 2 O, and CuMnOS added to the mixture of the other two, otherwise there is no H 2 gas release. This observation gives a hint that a series reaction operates in this system. To logically explain the complex reactions in each of the simple systems, our catalyst has to be quite active and can react in the CO 2 -H 2 O or CH 3 OH-H 2 O solution with H 2 O existing in both situations. To make the series reaction happen and to explain the rare phenomena, the catalyst has to firstly react with H 2 O, followed by the reaction with CO 2 in the CuMnOS-CO 2 -H 2 O system or with CH 3 OH in the CuMnOS-CH 3 OH-H 2 O one, as we had mentioned about the critical role of H 2 O. For catalyst to be active, its lattice bonding on surface needs to be weak for the interfacial exchange reactions. The degraded performance for the 200 °C-annealed CuMnOS in Table 4 is a support related to lattice bonding. Therefore, the second key factor for the success in the redox reactions is the weakened lattice oxygen at the catalyst surface to have its active lattice oxygen easily react with water for forming the oxygen vacancy and the oxidized OHon catalyst surface. The Kröger-Vink notation originally developed for ionic compounds is used here. For the oxygen vacancy ( + V O,lattice 2 ) as an example, the main body of V represents for vacancy, the subscript for the host lattice site, and the superscript for the relative charge. Here we adopted the positive charge of 2+ instead of the "• • " symbol in the original invention. For the active lattice oxygen, it is shown asO O,lattice 0 . Therefore, water oxidation reaction is shown below in term of the Kröger-Vink notation: In the above Eq. 1, the mass, charge, and lattice site are required to be conservative. The active lattice oxygen on surface and the generated oxygen vacancy become the oxidant and the reducing agents, respectively. The redox reactions by oxide defects in CeO 2 had been used for thermochemical catalytic production of solar fuels above 1000 °C 46,47 . Here we just perform the similar reactions in the liquid state at much lower temperature. Before discussing the CO 2 hydrogenation and CH 3 OH dehydrogenation, a common reaction in the Cu 2+ /Cu + -coexisting compounds is listed below for the consideration of the reaction reversibility: where − Cu Cu represents for the occupation of Cu + on the Cu 2+ lattice site with a relative negative charge of 1-and Cu Cu 0 for the Cu 2+ on the Cu 2+ lattice site. For the [Cu + ]-high CuMnOS-CO 2 -H 2 O reaction system to form CH 3 OH at NTP, the reducing agent of oxygen vacancy can be oxidized by H 2 O to form the active lattice oxygen on catalyst and 2 H + at the solid/liquid interface (Equation 3). The protons together with the hopping electrons between Cu + and Cu 2+ in the [Cu + ]-high CuMnOS, shown in Eq. 4, can reduce the dissolved and adsorbed CO 2 into CH 3 OH by the catalyst/solution interface reaction in Eq. 5. After combining Eqs. 2, 3, 4, and 5, the net equation 6 is obtained. Consistent with the data in Table 3, the mechanism explains that the increased Cu + content favors the electron formation in Eq. 4 and the CH 3  The kinetic reaction steps in Eqs. 1 and 3 demonstrate the lattice oxygen in and out at the catalyst/solution interface to hold the dynamic equilibrium and to keep CuMnOS behave as a catalyst for a long period of reaction and for repeated use without being exhausted. For the reaction to continuously run, the continuous supply of electrons for Eq. 4 is needed. The establishment of thermal equilibrium in Eq. 2 is also important to avoid the electron depletion.
For the [Cu + ]-low CuMnOS-CH 3 OH-H 2 O reaction system to form H 2 at NTP, the reduced oxygen vacancy reacts with H 2 O for water reduction to form H 2 , two electrical holes (2 h + ), and active lattice oxygen, as shown in Eq. 7. The hydroxyl group from Eq. 1 together with the hopping holes between Cu + and Cu 2+ in the [Cu + ]-low CuMnOS, shown in Eq. 8, can oxidize CH 3 OH into 5/2H 2 and CO 2 , as shown in Eq. 9. After combining Eqs. 1, 7, and 9, the net equation 10 is obtained. With this proposed mechanism, it can explain the fact that the aqueous methanol dehydrogenation cannot occur without the initiation of the water oxidation reaction in Eq. 1. It also explains the increased Cu + content unfavors the hole formation in Eq. 8 and the H 2 yield in Eq. 9, as supported by the data in Table 4.
Thermodynamic consideration for the CO 2 hydrogenation is evaluated to support the feasibility of the reaction in Eq. 6, which can be divided into Eqs. 11 and 12: . , favorable for the reaction in Eq. 6 to occur. From this explanation, the consideration of the chemical potential of lattice oxygen is very important. The schematic diagram for the chemical reaction paths for CO 2 and H 2 O to form methanol w/o catalyst is shown in Figure 7.
Similar to CO 2 hydrogenation, the catalytic reaction for aqueous methanol dehydrogenation can be calculated to be ∆ = . for Eq. 15. If P 1 is 0.01 atm for CO 2(g) and P 2 0.03 atm for H 2(g) , Δ G 4 for Eq. 14 is − 11.41 kJ/mol and Δ G 5 for Eq. 15 − 26.06 kJ/mol. The net standard Gibbs free energy of the reaction in Eq. 10 is Δ G 3 + Δ G 4 + Δ G 5 = − 28.41 kJ/mol, favorable for the reaction in Eq. 10 to occur.
2(g) 2(g) 1 = 3H (1 atm) 3H (P atm) The charge transfer between Cu + and Cu 2+ in semiconductor to provide the electron transport for the n-type or the hole transport for the p-type is understandable. The active lattice oxygen is the key factor for the success of the aqueous CO 2 reduction and aqueous CH 3 OH dehydrogenation. Basically, ceramic catalysts have long been viewed to be activated at high temperature but cannot at NTP in water. Here our proposed reaction mechanism of CuMnOS in water for redox reactions at NTP is similar to that of CeO 2 in water vapor at high temperature with the basis of oxygen vacancy 46 . The thermodynamic calculation also supports the occurrence of the redox reactions. The realization of our CO 2 -CH 3 OH cycle at NTP is strongly related to the reactions between catalyst and water (Equation 1), which are attributed to the low processing temperature for CuMnOS, the S 6+ -O bond formation, and the substitution of Mn for Cu to distort the lattice, to weaken the lattice O bonds, and to form the active lattice oxygen. The degraded performance in the H 2 yield for the 200 °C-annealed CuMnOS in Table 4 is related to the stronger bonding to deactivate the lattice oxygen for Eq. 1. The photo-excitation result in Table 4 also supports the water oxidation by catalyst as the first reaction step instead of the electron/hole-activated reaction. The weakening of the oxygen bonding to initiate catalytic reactions can be the design strategy for inorganic or heterogeneous catalysts to increase their catalytic activity at mild condition. Figure 8 is the schematic illustration to show the conservative CO 2 -CH 3 OH cycle. With the [Cu + ]-high CuMnOS catalyst, the greenhouse CO 2 gas can be recycled and re-utilized by catalytic reduction reaction together with water to form aqueous CH 3 OH solution as the hydrogen liquid carrier, fuel, or the chemical feedstock. With the [Cu + ]-low CuMnOS, aqueous CH 3 OH solution can be instantaneously dehydrogenated into H 2 and CO 2 . Both CH 3 OH and H 2 are important energy carriers and chemical precursors. The instantaneous H 2 generation from the CH 3 OH solution can be feasibly applied to the portable appliance, transportation vehicles, power plants etc., after methanol safety has been well considered. The products of CO 2 /H 2 O from the combustion of CH 3 OH/ H 2 can be again recycled and re-utilized. This CO 2 -CH 3 OH cycle occurred at NTP is conservative and renewable.  In summary, we demonstrate the nanoflower-like CuMnOS catalyst system to complete the conservative CO 2 -CH 3 OH hydrogenation-dehydrogenation cycle in an aqueous solution at normal temperature and pressure without additional energy inputs and reagents. This catalyst system has two different forms. The [Cu + ]-high CuMnOS can transport electrons and is used for the aqueous CO 2 hydrogenation to CH 3 OH at a yield of 21.1 mmol·g −1 catal.·h −1 . It is the [Cu + ]-low CuMnOS to transport holes and to instantaneously dehydrogenize aqueous CH 3 OH solution into H 2 at a yield of 7.65 mmol·g −1 catal.·h −1 . In additional to the electron and hole charges, the key factor in completing the CO 2 -CH 3 OH cycle is the active lattice oxygen of CuMnOS to firstly initiate water oxidation at the catalyst-water interface. The bond weakening concept in forming the active lattice oxygen opens a route to increase the catalytic activity of inorganic catalysts for redox reactions at mild condition. The H 2 liquid carrier of aqueous CH 3 OH solution with instantaneous H 2 liberation can provide wide applications in portable appliance, vehicle transportation, power plant etc.