Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Prebiotic galactooligosaccharides activate mucin and pectic galactan utilization pathways in the human gut symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron


Galactooligosaccharides (GOS) are prebiotic carbohydrates that impart changes in the gut bacterial composition of formula-fed infants to more closely resemble that of breast-fed infants. Consuming human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) provides specific bacterial strains with an advantage for colonizing the infant intestine. These same effects are seen in infants after GOS consumption, however GOS are very complex mixtures and the underlying molecular mechanisms of how GOS mimic HMOs are relatively unknown. Here we studied the effects of GOS utilization on a prominent gut symbiont, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, which has been previously shown to consume HMOs via mucin O-glycan degradation pathways. We show that several pathways for targeting O-mucin glycans are activated in B. thetaiotaomicron by GOS, as well as the galactan utilization sytem. Characterization of the endo-galactanase from this system identified activity on various longer GOS substrates while a subset of GOS compounds were identified as potential activators of mucin glycan metabolism in B. thetaiotaomicron. Our results show that GOS functions as an inducer of mucin-glycan pathways while providing a nutrient source in the form of β-(1 → 4)-galactan. These metabolic features of GOS mixtures may serve to explain the beneficial effects that are seen for GOS supplemented infant formula.


The human gastrointestinal tract is colonized by millions of bacteria that form a complex ecosystem between the food transiting the gut and epithelial lining of the intestinal tract1. Bacterial species are adapted to the dynamic conditions of the gastrointestinal tract where they must acquire nutrients from a variety of sources that are quickly transiting through the intestinal lumen2. Gut bacteria have evolved extensive metabolic systems to harvest nutrients they may encounter in the gut. The food we consume therefore dictates to a large extent what bacterial species are present in our gut microbiota3.

Glycans as dietary fibres are consumed by specialized gut bacteria4,5,6. In the absence of dietary glycans, the mucosal layer serves as a carbohydrate-rich alternative nutritional source for gut microbiota7,8. As such, microbial composition is also dependent on mucins9. Mucin is composed of high molecular weight glycoproteins that form a thick gel-like layer on the surface of the gut epithelium which acts as lubrication and a protective barrier between the intestinal lumen10. Within mucus, core-glycans are covalently linked to serine or threonine to form complex O-linked glycan structures11. The type of O-glycans produced in the human intestinal tract is dependent upon many factors encoded within the human genome, including expression of genes responsible for mucin synthesis (MUC), ones secretor type and/or blood group type (such as Lewis/ABO, etc)12. Bacteria that able to degrade mucin glycans are more easily adaptable to the changing intestinal environment and have an advantage in colonizing the mucosal surface for establishing themselves as a core species in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract7,11.

The bacterium Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron is a prominent member of the human microbiota and resides in the distal gut. It is characterized by its complex catabolic systems built up of carbohydrate-active enzymes and transporters that function to degrade a wide range of complex host and dietary polysaccharides into their individual monosaccharide components13,14. These catabolic systems are arranged in defined operons called polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs) that make up approximately 20% of the B. thetaiotaomicron genome and target specific polysaccharides for degradation4,5. B. thetaiotaomicron is found to contain PULs that target dietary polysaccharides, microbial polysaccharides, and human glycans such as mucins. The expression of PULs targeting mucin glycans was demonstrated to be important in colonization, persistence, and mother-to-infant transmission of B. thetaiotaomicron8. Human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) found in mothers milk facilitated mother-to-infant transmission by inducing the expression of a distinct subset of mucin O-glycan utilization PULs15, suggesting that HMOs can facilitate bacterial transmission to infants by activating mucin glycan utilization pathways.

In humans, mother’s natural milk contains approximately 8% (10 g/L) HMOs of which there are approximately 200 structures that have been shown to have beneficial impacts on infant health16,17. These include facilitating bacterial colonization18 and protection from pathogens19,20. Galactooligosaccharides (GOS) are non-digestible carbohydrates that have been shown to elicit similar beneficial health effects as HMOs21. Infants fed formulas supplemented with GOS develop a gut microbiome that more closely resembles the microbiomes of breast-fed infants, when compared to those fed formula without GOS22,23.

GOS are synthesized on a large scale by incubating specific β-galactosidase enzymes with high concentrations of lactose where the enzymes form complex GOS mixtures via transglycosylation reactions that contain many molecules of differing length, linkage type and branching24,25,26,27. When consumed, GOS reach the distal colon similar to HMOs where they are degraded by resident bacteria28, promoting the growth of bacterial families, including Bifidobacteriaceae and Bacteroidaceae, in the intestine of infants in a similar ratio to that found in the gut microbiota of breast-fed infants. GOS are very complex mixtures25, and very little is known about what components within GOS offer the same HMOs-like effects.

In this investigation we used B. thetaiotaomicron as a model bacterium to identify the potential effects of GOS on infant gut associated bacterial species. We identified two distinct mechanisms directed at GOS metabolism by B. thetaiotaomicron: firstly, extended linear β-(1 → 4)-linked GOS molecules were degraded via the action of an extracellular GH53 endo-β-(1 → 4)-galactanase that is encoded within a galactan utilization PUL. Secondly, a subset of PULs directed at O-glycan and host glycan metabolism were activated in B. thetaiotaomicron also previously implicated in metabolism of HMOs. We deduced that these PULs may be activated due to the presence of a subset of GOS compounds, namely branched GOS and lactose-disaccharide derivatives. Together, we show that specific GOS molecules mimic HMOs by expressing enzymes and transport components from PULs indicated in mucin-O-glycan degradation in B. thetaiotaomicron while a specific endo-β-galactanase directed at dietary fibre catabolism plays an important role in GOS degradation. This is the first study to identify the molecular details of GOS utilization by B. thetaiotaomicron from which we can speculate how specific GOS compounds may elicit responses similar to HMOs. These results provide a basis for making more selective prebiotic preparations for infant formulas and for broader prebiotic and dietary fibre applications.


B. thetaiotaomicron consumes distinct components of GOS mixtures

For this study, we made use of a purified GOS mixture (TS0903, provided by FrieslandCampina) based upon Vivinal GOS where the lactose starting material and other mono- and disaccharides have been removed. In essence, purified GOS represents a mixture of compounds that are available to the gut microbiota after the human digestible components (lactose, galactose and glucose) have been absorbed in the gut. We first analyzed the compounds present in the purified GOS mixture using HPAEC-PAD and compared this to the composition of Vivinal GOS which has been previously reported29. We could identify the majority of compounds within this purified GOS mixture, in terms of its carbohydrate content, linkage type and degree of polymerization (Fig. 1).

Figure 1: GOS profile analysis of Vivinal GOS (bottom) and purified GOS (top).

Compounds were separated by HPAEC-PAD and identified based on previously published information29. Galactose is depicted as yellow circles, glucose is depicted as blue circles. 1. D-glucose, 2. D-galactose, 3. β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-β-D-Gal, 4. β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-β-D-Glc, 5. β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Glc (lactose), 6. β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Gal, 7. β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Glc, 8. β-D-Galp-(1 → 2)-β-D-Glc, β-D-Galp-(1 → 3)-β-D-Glc, (A) DP3 Branched GOS (left to right) β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-]D-Glcp, β-D-Galp-(1 → 2)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-]D-Glcp and β-D-Galp-(1 → 2)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-]D-Glcp, β-D-Galp-(1 → 3)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-]D-Glcp. 9. β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Glc, 10. β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 2)-β-D-Glc, β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 3)-β-D-Glc, (B) compounds in A) with an additional β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-linked residue on the non-reducing end on either galactose residue. 11. β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Glc, 12. β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 2)-β-D-Glc, β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 3)-β-D-Glc, C) compounds in A) with an additional β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-linked residues present on the non-reducing end of both galactose residues. 13. β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Glc, 14. β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 2)-β-D-Glc, β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 3)-β-D-Glc, 15. β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Glc.

The purified GOS mixture has considerably higher amounts of linear GOS with a degree of polymerization (DP) of three than Vivinal GOS (30% versus 15%) (Table 1), with 4-galactosyllactose being the major peak (Fig. 1). In Vivinal GOS, the DP2 content is significantly greater than in TS0903 GOS (27% versus 8%); Vivinal GOS contained much higher amounts of the starting material lactose than purified GOS (19% versus 1%). Also, purified GOS contained greater amounts of DP4 and higher GOS than Vivinal GOS (38% versus 11%), and a higher proportion of branched compounds (17% versus 7%). We chose to use the purified GOS mixture in our studies because it consisted of the presumable indigestible portion of GOS, i.e. only those compounds which would enter the lower gastrointestinal tract after being exposed to human digestive enzymes in the small intestine.

Table 1 Ratios of GOS compounds expressed in a percentage of total GOS mixture as determined by relative peak heights obtained by HPAEC-PAD elution profiles (see Materials and Methods).

To investigate metabolic properties of GOS consumption, we grew B. thetaiotaomicron in a carbon-limited minimal medium containing the purified GOS mixture at 5 mg/ml concentrations. B. thetaiotaomicron exhibited excellent growth on GOS (Fig. 2), reaching OD values greater than the control cultures containing an equal amount of glucose. A non-parametric two-tailed Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test resulted in a P value = 0.0374 (P < 0.05, 95% confidence) suggesting that over the 72 hours period of measured growth of B. thetaiotaomicron there is a statistically significant difference between GOS than glucose. Using HPAEC-PAD analysis of culture supernatants we confirmed that the majority of GOS compounds within the mixture were consumed by B. thetaiotaomicron. From a comparison of the HPAEC-PAD profiles of the starting mixture with the supernatant after bacterial growth, we identified the 2 compounds remaining in culture supernatants as a branched DP3 compound β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-]D-Glcp (see Supplementary Material, Fig. 1) and the disaccharide β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-β-D-Gal which appears to be in a slightly larger quantity than the initial starting material (Fig. 3).

Figure 2: Growth on GOS mixture.

Growth curves of B. thetaiotaomicron in a minimally defined medium with carbon sources added at a final concentration of 5 mg/ml. Hungate tubes flushed with gas containing 80%N2, 10%H2, 10% CO2. Readings were taken by placing Hungate tubes in the spectrophotometer at time intervals over a 4-day period. Glucose (diamonds), purified GOS (triangles) and carbon excluded control (circles). A non-parametric two-tailed Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test gives a P value = 0.0374 (P < 0.05, 95% confidence) statistically significant difference between glucose versus GOS (indicated by *).

Figure 3: HPAEC-PAD separation and analysis of GOS mixture before (dotted line) and after growth (solid line) in B. thetaiotaomicron chemically defined minimal media plus GOS.

Compounds identified in GOS mixture after growth: β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-]D-Glcp and galactobiose. Verification that the branched DP3 compound was β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-]D-Glcp was done by H1 NMR analysis (see Supplementary Material, Fig. 1).

Identification of galactan and mucin O-glycan PULS involved in B. thetaiotaomicron GOS consumption

In order to determine which polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs) within the B. thetaiotaomicron genome are induced to be expressed an produced as proteins in response to GOS, we took the culture supernatants after growth and analyzed for proteins and enzymes using mass spectrometry as has been previously described30. Previously it was found that B. thetaiotaomicron consumes hMOS using a distinct set of pathways attributed to mucin-O-glycan utilization15 (Table 2). Since GOS are thought to mimic properties of hMOS, we aimed to identify whether similar features were also activated by GOS in B. thetaiotaomicron (Table 2). As a confirmation that proteomics is a suitable method for detecting expressed components of PULs, we grew a culture of B. thetaiotaomicron on defined minimal medium containing 5 mg/ml purified HMOs substrates (Supplementary Material, Fig. 2) isolated from a donor milk sample as a sole carbon source to compare with previous HMOs qPCR gene expression analysis results15.

Table 2 SusC/D pairs identified in proteomics analysis of B. thetaiotaomicron culture supernatants after growth on lactose, galactooligosaccharides and hMOS.

Within the sets of proteomics data we identified several SusC-like and SusD-like proteins from GOS and HMOs culture filtrates (Table 2, see Supplementary Material for full analytical report). SusC/SusD homologs31,32 form the major transport components of PULs and expression of these homologs is an indication of PUL activation by specific carbohydrate inducer substrates. We observed that TS0903 GOS molecules induce expression of several SusC and SusD homologs in B. thetaiotaomicron that are associated with hMOS and mucin utilization PULs (this study and ref. 15). In total, GOS induced the expression of five PUL SusC/D homologs that were also upregulated by HMOs and mucin8,15. These are BT_2032/BT_2033, BT_3958/BT3959, BT_4246/BT_4247, BT_4297/BT_4298 and BT_2805/BT_2806. In previous studies, BT_3958/BT_3959 was identified as a mucin O-glycan PUL upregulated by the Core 1 disaccharide, while BT_4246/BT_4247, BT_4297/BT_4298 and BT_2805/BT_2806 are upregulated in the presence of mucin O-glycans of undefined structure8,15. The PUL identified by BT_2032/BT_2033 is a separate PUL that appears to be induced by lactose and had not been previously identified as a PUL upregulated by mucin-O-glycans when compared to the galactose controls15. This specific PUL maybe expressed due to catabolite derepression caused by an accumulation of galactose; this PUL remains of undefined function.

In addition there were several individual SusC and SusD proteins identified in GOS culture supernatants that are associated with B. thetaiotaomicron HMOs consumption (Table 2). An additional SusC transporter (BT_0439) implicated in degradation of host glycans, and two additional SusD binding protein homologs induced by mucin O-glycans, BT_1039, and N-acetyllactosamine specific BT_2559, were identified.

SusC/D homologs of another prominent single PUL were identified in GOS culture supernatants that were neither found in hMOS nor in mucin culture supernatants. These were identified by the genetic ID loci BT_4670/BT_4671. These form the transport components of the putative galactan utilization system in B. thetaiotaomicron. Galactan utilization systems are employed by bacterial species for degradation and uptake of pectic galactan (Tabachnikov and Shoham, 2013)(Delangle et al., 2007), a linear polymer of β-(1 → 4)-linked galactose, that constitutes a structural component of pectin in plant cell walls. B. thetaiotaomicron encodes a PUL system for pectic galactan degradation (BT4667 – BT4673) which includes an encoded extracellular endo-β-(1 → 4)-galactanase (family GH53) for degrading larger galactan polymers (Fig. 4)33. Previous studies on GOS utilization by the probiotic bacterium Bifidobacterium breve have also shown that GH53 endo-β-galactanase activity is important for GOS utilization by Bifidobacteria34. Therefore we went on to investigate what the contribution of this endo-galactanase activity is towards utilization of GOS substrates.

Figure 4: Graphical representation of the pectic galactan PUL from B. thetaiotaomicron.

GH2, family 2 glycoside hydrolase, GH53, family 53 glycoside hydrolase, SusE, SUsD and SusC-like substrate binding and transport proteins, and hybrid two-component sensor regulator (HCTS). Protein identification numbers are listed above each PUL component.

Influence of pectic galactan associated Endo-β-Galactanase

Comparison of GOS with pectic galactan reveals the same structural motifs in pectic galactan and in GOS compounds that have a higher DP and contain extensions of β-(1 → 4)-linked galactose residues (Fig. 5). Since pectic galactan is a dietary polysaccharide and has not been previously shown to be associated with HMOs effects (Table 2), galactan utilization PUL induction in B. thetaiotaomicron in the presence of GOS would be separate from mucin utilization – associated function. The proteome analysis from GOS culture supernatants identified the presence of the extracellular family GH53 endo-β-galactanase (BT4668) from the galactan utilization PUL while we did not find this enzyme in hMOS samples (Table 2) (Supplementary Material File 1). To study the potential effects of galactan PUL activation, we investigated the activity of the endo-β-galactanase GH53 enzyme (BT4668) with GOS substrates.

Figure 5

Graphical representation of the pectic galactan (a) and linear GOS (b) substrates showing the structural similarities between these two classes of compounds. Galactose is depicted as yellow circles, glucose is depicted as blue circles.

We cloned the gene BT4668 encoding endo-galactanase enzyme from B. thetaiotaomicron (herein called BtGH53), expressed it in E. coli and purified the enzyme to test for its activity on GOS. The enzyme was produced in soluble form and in large quantities (approx. 100 mg/L culture) and purified to >95% purity.

BtGH53 was found to be active on β-(1 → 4)-linked potato galactan (Fig. 6) but was not active on larch arabino galactan with β-(1 → 3)-linkage type (not shown). At the initial stages (1 min), BtGH53 converted potato galactan into GOS products with a degree of polymerization ranging from DP1-8 (Fig. 6). BtGH53 thus is an endo-acting β-galactanase enzyme. As the reaction progressed, GalDP4 and higher were hydrolyzed further to produce GalDP3, GalDP2 and galactose. At completion (circa 20 h) the main products were galactose (23%) and galactobiose (77%). These results suggest that BtGH53 is an endo-β-galactanase but also has some exo-activity in view of the presence of galactose and activity on GalDP3 substrate.

Figure 6: Enzymatic activity of BtGH53 on pectic galactan.

(a) TLC analysis of products formed in time by BtGH53 incubated with potato galactan. (b) HPAEC-PAD profile of galactan derived products formed in time.

Subsequently we tested for BtGH53 activity on the purified GOS mixture (Fig. 7). TLC analysis showed that BtGH53 facilitates hydrolysis of GOS that have a higher degree of polymerization forming galactobiose as the major product (Fig. 7a). By further examining the products of depolymerization using HPAEC-PAD we observed that BtGH53 hydrolyzes linear DP3 and higher GOS compounds (i.e. those compounds that contain at least two β-(1 → 4)-linked galactose residues) forming galactobiose as the main product (Fig. 7b). As an endo-β-galactanase BtGH53 thus acts on the linear high DP GOS compounds that share similar motifs to native pectic galactans (Fig. 5).

Figure 7: Enzymatic activity of BtGH53 on GOS.

(a) TLC analysis of the products formed by enzymatic digestion of BtGH53 on GOS mixture. Lane 1: Pectic galactan products standard. Lane 2: GOS, Lane 3: GOS + BtGH53. 10 μl of BtGH53 was incubated with 10 μl of 1% GOS in reaction buffer for 16 h at 37 °C. Afterwards, 2 × 2 μl of each reaction was spotted on a TLC plate and run for 4 h in solvent system containing 3:1:1 isopropanol, ethyl acetate, water. Spots were visualized using stain containing 20% sulfuric acid, 80% methanol and 0.5% orcinol after heating at 110 °C for 20 min. (b) Corresponding HPAEC-PAD analysis of BtGH53 activity on GOS (dotted line: before incubation; solid line: after incubation) showing depletion of higher DP GOS molecules and accumulation of galactobiose. (A) DP3 Branched GOS (left to right) β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-]D-Glcp, β-D-Galp-(1 → 2)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-]D-Glcp and β-D-Galp-(1 → 2)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-]D-Glcp, β-D-Galp-(1 → 3)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-]D-Glcp. (B) compounds in (A) with an additional β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-linked residue on the non-reducing end on either galactose residue.

Also the branched DP4 GOS in region B were partially hydrolyzed, suggesting that GH53 may be cleaving terminal galactose from these compounds. GH53 enzymes from fungal origin have been observed to have exo-activity35, while the GH53 from Bacillus licheniformis did not33. Because we observed that BtGH53 degrades galactan DP3 products to DP2 plus galactose (Fig. 6), the exo-activity of BtGH53 on these substrates is plausible, however more experimental evidence, such as three-dimensional structural information of BtGH53 in complex with GOS substrate and enzymatic activity on individually purified GOS compounds would be beneficial to support this hypothesis.

We observed that the branched DP3 compounds β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-]D-Glcp and β-D-Galp-(1 → 2)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-]D-Glcp, β-D-Galp-(1 → 3)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-]D-Glcp and β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 2)-]D-Glcp (region A) and the linear DP3 compound 6-galactosyl-lactose were recalcitrant to BtGH53 activity. The DP2 compounds Gal-β-(1 → 2)-Glc, Gal-β-(1 → 3)-Glc, Galβ-(1 → 6)-Gal, Galβ-(1 → 6)-Glc (allolactose) also were not cleaved. Additionally, we observed an accumulation of lactose and Gal-β-(1 → 2)-Glc/Gal-β-(1 → 3)-Glc after BtGH53 activity, likely arising from the hydrolysis of higher DP compounds (Fig. 7b).

BtGH53 thus facilitates the degradation of linear and elongated branched GOS to produce galactobiose as the major product. The remaining GOS molecules that are not targeted by BtGH53 are DP2 Galβ-(1 → 2)-Glc and Gal β-(1 → 3)-Glc, Gal-β-(1 → 6)-Glc (allolactose) and Gal-β-(1 → 6)-Gal, linear DP3 6-GalLac, and the branched DP3 compounds β-D-Galp-(1 → 2)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-]D-Glcp, β-D-Galp-(1 → 3)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-]D-Glcp and β-D-Galp-(1 → 4)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 2)-]D-Glcp (Fig. 8a). These eight compounds constitute a class of GOS molecules that are potentially important in promoting the growth of beneficial gut bacteria in a similar manner as HMOs. Due to the limited availability of these GOS molecules at this time, further analysis of the impact of individual molecules is problematic. Attempts to grow B. thetaiotaomicron on commercially available 6-galactosyl-lactose as a sole carbon source failed. Perhaps on its own, 6-galactosyl-lactose cannot be processed by B. thetaiotaomicron and requires the presence of another compound to initiate metabolism in a sequential manner. The implications of these individual GOS molecules and their function in inducing mucin utilization pathways as single compounds or in combinations warrants further investigation.

Figure 8

A schematic comparison of GOS compounds potentially inducing O-glycan utilization pathways (a) (this study) with core HMOs glycan structures (b) ref. 15 and mucin core glycan structures (c) ref. 11.

Our data provides the first time demonstration that prebiotic GOS mixtures activate the galactan PUL and a subset of mucin glycan utilization PULs in B. thetaiotaomicron.


In this study we performed a detailed analysis of the effects of GOS on the activation of PULs in B. thetaiotaomicron in order to unravel what features of GOS provide the qualities of hMOS mimicry in intestinal microbiota. We found that consumption of GOS by B. thetaiotaomicron, a dominant bacterial species of the distal gastrointestinal tract, results in the activation of a combination of mucin glycan and galactan utilization pathways. Higher DP GOS compounds are metabolized by an endo-galactanase BtGH53, while small DP2 and branched GOS trisaccharides acted as potential inducers for the expression of mucin glycan degradation PUL-encoded systems in B. thetaiotaomicron. This was indicated by the presence of SusC and SusD homologs in B. thetaiotaomicron culture supernatants which correlated with the bacterium expressing transporters that are involved in the uptake of specific products of glycan degradation14,30.

We observed that the galactan utilization pathway plays an important role in metabolism of GOS by B. thetaiotaomicron. Longer DP GOS carrying β-(1 → 4)-galactan motifs are degraded by the GH53 endo-β-galactanase, whilst some of the mucin-glycan pathway inducer molecules are only uncovered after endo-β-galactanase activity. Therefore bacteria that harbor the ability to degrade galactan will uncover some of the underlying mucin inducer molecules buried in the higher DP GOS molecules. Several members of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes encode GH53 endo-β-galactanase enzymes (Table 3)(, and interestingly they are found in many Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides strains that colonize the infant gut. Bifidobacterium strains that encode GH53 enzymes include B. breve, B. longum sub infantis and B. longum sub longum that are also found in the gut of breast-fed infants37 (Table 3). Previous studies on GOS utilization by Bifidobacterium breve showed that its endo-β-galactanase played a key role in degrading higher DP GOS34. However, it is unknown whether the same mechanism of galactan consumption plus induction of mucin degradation pathways we observed in B. thetaiotaomicron is also a feature of GOS utilization in infant gut associated Bifidobacterium strains. We can speculate that there may be some similarities because in addition to the presence of GH53 enzymes, B. breve, B. longum sub infantis and B. longum sub longum are also considered moderate degraders of mucin7,38. These specific three strains were also found to be the predominant strains in fecal samples of infants fed GOS/FOS supplemented infant formula and breast-fed infants but not in fecal samples of infants fed standard infant formula39. There is evidence to support the theory that GOS promotes the growth of intestinal Bifidobacterium strains by inducing both mucin glycan and galactan utilization pathways, however this still needs to be further investigated.

Table 3 The presence of GH53 enzymes in microbial strains associated with gut microbiota.

We also demonstrated in our study the ability to correlate different GOS DP fractions with direct physiological effects on the bacterium. Previous studies on GOS consumption by Bifidobacterium strains showed that each strain consumed GOS at different rates and growth rate was directly attributed to the ability of the Bifidobacterium species to use specific isomers within the GOS mixtures40. Our study shows that B. thetaiotaomicron uses almost all isomers in the GOS mixture. Using knowledge on what each HPAEC-PAD peak represents in sugar content and linkage type29, we can more specifically define, in addition to DP, what GOS isomers are consumed by specific bacteria. Using the more specific definitions of GOS, we can in the future apply this methodology to GOS consumption by other bacterial species.

Based on what is known about the composition of HMOs and core mucin glycans (Fig. 8)11,18, we hypothesize that the Gal β-(1 → 3)-Glc and 6-GalLac molecules structurally mimic the core mucin and hMOS motifs, while the branched DP3 compound β-D-Galp-(1 → 3)-[β-D-Galp-(1 → 6)-]D-Glcp structurally mimics the branched core mucin glycan motifs found in core 2 and core 4 glycans. Allolactose (Gal-β-(1 → 6)-Glc) present in GOS is typically an inducer of the Lac-operon and is degraded by lactose-specific β-galactosidases41. However, since we did not characterize the activation of glycan PULs in B. thetaiotaomicron with allolactose as a sole carbon source, we cannot yet exclude it as a potential inducer of mucin glycan associated pathways.

The exact mechanism of structural mimicry of GOS compounds eliciting mucin-glycan utilization systems is still not clear. Whether it is the features of sugar composition or the position of the glycosidic linkage in these particular GOS molecules that activates expression of particular mucin glycan utilization pathways still needs to be investigated. Most core glycan motifs contain GalNac and GlcNac residues that are not found in GOS, suggesting that the linkage type may be more important in this regard than the monosaccharide content. To date the majority of studies concerning bacterial mucin glycan metabolism use oligosaccharides containing N-acetyl-D-lactosamine disaccharide or entire human or pig gastric mucin isolates, which are very complex in size and glycan composition. In this study we identify additional motifs that potentially activate mucin glycan PULs, therefore the knowledge gained in this study is also in identifying specific glycan molecules in GOS that may trigger induction of specific mucin glycan utilization pathways, which to our knowledge has not been observed before.

The presence of specific polysaccharides will dictate which bacteria dominate in their environment4,42. Galactooligosaccharides are considered a fermentable fibre with potential beneficial health effects by promoting the growth of bacteria in the infant microbiome with a similar composition as in infants that are fed natural mother’s milk22. We demonstrate in our current study that the beneficial properties exhibited by GOS as a fermentable fibre by microbial species residing in the gastrointestinal tract are likely two-fold: Firstly, higher DP GOS act as a nutritional source in the form of dietary galactan and the ability to degrade galactan appears to be a characteristic feature of many gut microbial species that are associated with consumption of HMOs. Secondly, GOS mixtures contain molecules that induce mucin glycan utilization pathways which may help promote colonization and adaptation of bacterial species in the GI tract. Mucin glycan foraging is essential for persistence of B. thetaiotaomicron in the gut8 while HMOs promote intestinal colonization of B. thetaiotaomicron via mucin-associated pathways15. Therefore the specific GOS molecules identified in this study that trigger mucin glycan utilization pathways may act as “intestinal adaptation factors” to promote colonization and adaptation of mucin-degrading bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract. It is likely that the combination of these effects contributes to the features of GOS as HMO-mimics. The metabolic features of GOS revealed in this study may be useful for the future design of fermentable fibres or prebiotic compounds that selectively promote the growth and colonization of beneficial bacteria, for example by generating new GOS preparations consisting of products of BtGH53-treated pectic galactan combined with DP2 and branched DP3 GOS, or for the selection of probiotic bacterial strains that may be administered in combination with galactooligosaccharides.


Prebiotic features of GOS is as a combination of galactan plus HMO-like molecules, which stimulated the activation of pectic galactan and mucin-O-glycan degradation pathways in B. thetaiotaomicron. Higher DP GOS resembled β-(1 → 4)-galactan, which was shown to be efficiently degraded by an extracellular family GH53 endo-galactanase enzyme. A smaller subset of GOS compounds, namely DP2 and branched DP3 GOS, were attributed to activation of O-mucin glycan degradation pathways, similar to HMOs. These GOS molecules may facilitate colonization of mucus-adapted microbial species in the gastrointestinal tract, therefore future studies into the molecular mechanisms and effects of GOS on bacterial mucin utilization in the gastrointestinal tract is an exciting new frontier for GOS-related research.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains, media and reagents

Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron VPI-5482 was purchased from DSMZ (DSM 2079, ATCC 29148) (Braunschweig, Germany). The Vivinal ® GOS and TS0903 GOS mixtures were provided by FrieslandCampina (NL). 6-GalactosylLactose was purchased from Carbosynth (UK). Pectic galactan (potato) was purchased from Megazyme (UK). All other media and reagents were purchased from Sigma (Zwijndrecht, Netherlands) unless otherwise stated.

Isolation of HMOs

HMOs were isolated from a human milk sample that was collected from a volunteer, collecting a full feeding of at least 100 mL around 1 month post-partum. 10 mL human milk samples were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The clear liquid was applied on a graphitized carbon column (10 g, graphitized carbon black, 20–60 mesh, SigmaAldrich) and washed with 30 mL Milli-Q water. The majority of lactose was removed by washing with 30 mL 2% ACN and hMOS were eluted with 40% ACN, containing 0.05% TFA.

B. thetaiotaomicron growth experiments

B. thetaiotaomicron growth was carried out as described previously8. Briefly, overnight cultures of B. thetaiotaomicron were grown at 37 °C in rich medium (Brain Heart infusion broth + 5 mM L-cysteine) under anaerobic conditions in an anaerobic jar (Oxoid) with a GasPak (BD). The following day, 1 ml of a 50 fold dilution containing B. thetaiotaomicron overnight culture was prepared in a carbon-limited minimally defined medium of 100 mM KH2PO4 (pH 7.2), 15 mM NaCl, 8.5 mM (NH4)2SO4, 4 mM L-cysteine, 1.9 mM hematin, 200 mM L-histidine, 100 nM MgCl2, 1.4 nM FeSO4 · 7 H2O, 50 mM CaCl2, 1 mg/ml vitamin K3, 5 ng/ml vitamin B12 and individual carbon sources (0.5%, wt/vol). Cultures containing 2 ml total volume were prepared in Hungate tubes under anaerobic conditions using Hungate techniques by flushing sealed culture tubes with 100% CO2 gas43. Growth curves were obtained by incubating tubes at 37 °C and taking optical density readings at 600 nm (OD600) at ~1–2 h time intervals over a 4 day period. A non-parametric two-tailed Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test between glucose and purified GOS (Fig. 2) was carried out using the program GraphPad Prism 7 (Graphpad Software Inc., San Diego, USA).


GOS components and products of enzymatic digestion were analyzed by high-pH anion-exchange chromatography on a Dionex DX500 work station equipped with an ED40 pulsed amperometric detection system (HPAEC-PAD) as described previously26. The oligosaccharides were separated on a CarboPac PA-1 column (250 by 5 mm; Dionex) using a system of buffer A = 0.1 M NaOH, buffer B = 0.6 M NaOAc in 0.1 M NaOH, buffer C = deionized water and buffer D = 50 mM NaOAc. Separation was performed with 10% A, 85% C and 5% D in 25 min to 40% A, 10% C and 50% D, followed by a 35-min gradient to 75% A, 25% B, directly followed by 5 min washing with 100% B and reconditioning with 10% A, 85% B and 5% D for 7 min.

Proteomics and enzyme activity analysis

After growth, cultures were centrifuged to obtain supernatants which subsequently were filtered through a 0.2 μm-pore-size syringe filter (Millipore). Identification of proteins in culture supernatants produced by B. thetaiotaomicron were analyzed as described previously30. For CAZyme activity in culture supernatants, 100 μl of culture supernatant was added to 100 μl of a 10 mg/ml solution of GOS carbohydrate solution in deionized water and incubated at 37 °C overnight to allow the enzyme reactions to proceed. Analysis of the activity of the BtGH53 endo-galactanase on GOS substrates was carried out in Reaction buffer at 37 °C and carbohydrate products were analyzed by HPAEC-PAD (as described above) and by TLC.

Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) of GOS carbohydrates and enzymatic products was completed as described in the literature44. Briefly, 2 μl of each reaction mixture was spotted, dried, and then subsequently spotted again on a silica gel 60 plate (Millipore). The solvent system used was 3:1:1 isopropanol, ethylacetate, and deionized water, and plates were run in a TLC jar for approximately 4 to 5 h. Plates were removed from the jar and dried, and spots were visualized by staining with 20% sulfuric acid plus 0.5% orcinol in methanol and heated at 110 °C for half an hour. Plates were scanned and figures prepared using Adobe Photoshop.

Production of BtGH53

BtGH53 (BT_4668) was amplified from B. thetaiotaomicron VPI-5482 genomic DNA by PCR using the Forward primer CAGGGACCCGGTGAAGATGGCCCGGTTACAAATCCTCG and Reverse primer CGAGGAGAAGCCCGG TTATTGGATTTTAAAAGCATCTAGTGC containing a stop codon (underlined). The resulting amplified DNA was cloned into a modified pET15b vector (Novagen) containing a LIC (ligation independent cloning) site via the incorporated LIC-specific primer sequences (indicated in bold). The resulting expression vector pBtGH53 encoded BtGH53 with an additional N-terminal His6 tag. Recombinant BtGH53 was produced in Escherichia coli BL21*DE3 cells (Novagen) harboring the pBtGH53 plasmid. Cells were grown in Luria Bertani (LB) broth containing ampicillin at a concentration of 100 μg/ml at 37 °C until an OD600 of 1.1 was reached. Protein overproduction was induced by the addition of 1 mM isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside and cultures were then further incubated for 16 h at 25 °C. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in buffer containing 20 mM Tris pH8.0, 500 mM NaCl, and lysed by sonication. Recombinant His6-tagged BtGH53 was purified from supernatants by immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) on a nickel-sepharose column (GE Healthcare) preequilibrated with the same buffer and eluted with a gradient of imidazole. Eluted fractions were assessed by SDS-PAGE for the presence of BtGH53 with a size of 39.6 KDa. Pooled fractions of BtGH533 were dialyzed into buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl (Reaction buffer). The concentration of BtGH53 protein was determined spectrophotometrically at 280 nm using an extinction coefficient of 0.07326 μM−1 cm−1.

Determination of BtGH53 specific activities

BtGH53 endo-galactanase activity was determined using potato galactan (Megazyme). A reaction mixture containing 500 μl 2% potato Galactan in 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0 plus 500 μl of 5 μM BtGH53 in the same buffer was incubated for 1 min, 10 min, 60 min and 20 h at 37 °C. After incubation, the reaction was stopped by heating the reactions to 65 degrees celcius for 10 min. The reactions were centrifuged for 10 min at 2800 g. BtGH53 activity on galactan and GOS substrates was analyzed using TLC and HPAEC-PAD as stated above.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Lammerts van Bueren. A et al. Prebiotic galactooligosaccharides activate mucin and pectic galactan utilization pathways in the human gut symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. Sci. Rep. 7, 40478; doi: 10.1038/srep40478 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1

    Hooper, L. V. & Macpherson, A. J. Immune adaptations that maintain homeostasis with the intestinal microbiota. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 159–69 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Notghi, A., Hutchinson, R., Kumar, D., Smith, N. B. & Harding, L. K. Simplified method for the measurement of segmental colonic transit time. Gut 35, 976–981 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    David, L. a. et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 505, 559–63 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Rogowski, A. et al. Glycan complexity dictates microbial resource allocation in the large intestine. Nat. Commun. 6, 7481, doi: 10.1038/ncomms8481 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Martens, E. C. et al. Recognition and Degradation of Plant Cell Wall Polysaccharides by Two Human Gut Symbionts. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001221 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Milani, C. et al. Bifidobacteria exhibit social behavior through carbohydrate resource sharing in the gut. Sci. Rep. 5, doi: 10.1038/srep15782 (2015).

  7. 7

    Tailford, L. E., Crost, E. H., Kavanaugh, D. & Juge, N. Mucin glycan foraging in the human gut microbiome. Front. Genet. 6, 81, doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00081 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Martens, E. C., Chiang, H. C. & Gordon, J. I. Mucosal Glycan Foraging Enhances Fitness and Transmission of a Saccharolytic Human Gut Bacterial Symbiont. Cell Host Microbe 4, 447–457 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Li, H. et al. The outer mucus layer hosts a distinct intestinal microbial niche. Nat. Commun, doi: 10.1038/ncomms9292 (2015).

  10. 10

    Corfield, A. P. Mucins : A biologically relevant glycan barrier in mucosal protection. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Gen. Subj. 1850, 236–252 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Bergstrom, K. S. B. & Xia, L. Mucin-type O-glycans and their roles in intestinal homeostasis. Glycobiology 23, 1026–1037 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Robbe, C., Capon, C., Coddeville, B. & Michalski, J.-C. Structural diversity and specific distribution of O-glycans in normal human mucins along the intestinal tract. Biochem. J. 384, 307–16 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Sonnenburg, J. L. et al. Glycan foraging in vivo by an intestine-adapted bacterial symbiont. Science 307, 1955–9 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Martens, E. C., Koropatkin, N. M., Smith, T. J. & Gordon, J. I. Complex glycan catabolism by the human gut microbiota: the Bacteroidetes Sus-like paradigm. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 24673–7 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Marcobal, A. et al. Bacteroides in the infant gut consume milk oligosaccharides via mucus-utilization pathways. Cell Host Microbe 10, 507–14 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Bode, L. Human milk oligosaccharides: every baby needs a sugar mama. Glycobiology 22, 1147–62 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Bode, L. The functional biology of human milk oligosaccharides. Early Hum. Dev. 1–4, doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.09.001 (2015).

  18. 18

    Marcobal, a. & Sonnenburg, J. L. Human milk oligosaccharide consumption by intestinal microbiota. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18 Suppl 4, 12–5 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Newburg, D. S., Ruiz-Palacios, G. M. & Morrow, A. L. Human Milk Glycans Protect Infants Against Enteric Pathogens. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 25, 37–58 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Manthey, C. F., Autran, C. a., Eckmann, L. & Bode, L. Human Milk Oligosaccharides Protect Against Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Attachment In Vitro and EPEC Colonization in Suckling Mice. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 58, 167–170 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Ben, X. et al. Supplementation of milk formula with galacto-oligosaccharides improves intestinal micro-flora and fermentation in term infants. Chin. Med. J. (Engl). 117, 927–931 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Davis, L. M. G., Martínez, I., Walter, J., Goin, C. & Hutkins, R. W. Barcoded pyrosequencing reveals that consumption of galactooligosaccharides results in a highly specific bifidogenic response in humans. PLoS One 6, e25200 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Garrido, D. et al. Utilization of galactooligosaccharides by Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis isolates. Food Microbiol. 33, 262–270 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Prenosil, J. E., Stuker, E. & Bourne, J. R. Formation of oligosaccharides during enzymatic lactose: Part I: State of art. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 30, 1019–1025 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    van Leeuwen, S. S., Kuipers, B. J. H., Dijkhuizen, L. & Kamerling, J. P. Comparative structural characterization of 7 commercial galacto-oligosaccharide (GOS) products. Carbohydr. Res. 425, 48–58 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    van Leeuwen, S. S., Kuipers, B. J. H., Dijkhuizen, L. & Kamerling, J. P. 1H NMR analysis of the lactose/β-galactosidase-derived galacto-oligosaccharide components of Vivinal® GOS up to DP5. Carbohydr. Res. 400, 59–73 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Park, A.-R. & Oh, D.-K. Galacto-oligosaccharide production using microbial β-galactosidase: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 85, 1279–1286 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Gietl, E. et al. Factors Involved in the In Vitro Fermentability of Short Carbohydrates in Static Faecal Batch Cultures. Int. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 2012, 1–10 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    van Leeuwen, S. S., Kuipers, B. J. H., Dijkhuizen, L. & Kamerling, J. P. Development of a (1)H NMR structural-reporter-group concept for the analysis of prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharides of the [β-d-Galp-(1 → x)]n-d-Glcp type. Carbohydr. Res. 9–13, doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2014.08.011 (2014).

  30. 30

    Lammerts van Bueren, A., Saraf, A., Martens, E. C. & Dijkhuizen, L. Differential Metabolism of Exopolysaccharides from Probiotic Lactobacilli by the Human Gut Symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 3973–3983 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Cho, K. H., Cho, D., Wang, G. R. & Salyers, A. A. New regulatory gene that contributes to control of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron starch utilization genes. J. Bacteriol. 183, 7198–7205 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Martens, E. C., Koropatkin, N. M., Smith, T. J. & Gordon, J. I. Complex Glycan Catabolism by the Human Gut Microbiota: The Bacteroidetes Sus-like Paradigm. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 24673–24677 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Ryttersgaard, C. et al. The structure of endo-beta-1,4-galactanase from Bacillus licheniformis in complex with two oligosaccharide products. J. Mol. Biol. 341, 107–17 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    O’Connell Motherway, M., Kinsella, M., Fitzgerald, G. F. & van Sinderen, D. Transcriptional and functional characterization of genetic elements involved in galacto-oligosaccharide utilization by Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003. Microb. Biotechnol. 6, 67–79 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Torpenholt, S. et al. Activity of three β−1,4-galactanases on small chromogenic substrates. Carbohydr. Res. 346, 2028–2033 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Lombard, V., Golaconda Ramulu, H., Drula, E., Coutinho, P. M. & Henrissat, B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D490–D495 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Sela, D. a. Bifidobacterial utilization of human milk oligosaccharides. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 149, 58–64 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Ruas-Madiedo, P., Gueimonde, M., Fernandez-Garcia, M., de los Reyes-Gavilan, C. G. & Margolles, a. Mucin Degradation by Bifidobacterium Strains Isolated from the Human Intestinal Microbiota. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 1936–1940 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Haarman, M. & Knol, J. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assays To Identify and Quantify Fecal Bifidobacterium Species in Infants Receiving a Prebiotic Infant Formula Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assays To Identify and Quantify Fecal Bifidobacterium Species in Infants Receiving a Prebio. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 2318–2324 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Peacock, K. S., Ruhaak, L. R., Tsui, M. K., Mills, D. a. & Lebrilla, C. B. Isomer-specific consumption of galactooligosaccharides by bifidobacterial species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61, 12612–9 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Wheatley, R. W., Lo, S., Jancewicz, L. J., Dugdale, M. L. & Huber, R. E. Structural Explanation for Allolactose (lac Operon Inducer) Synthesis by lacZ -Galactosidase and the Evolutionary Relationship between Allolactose Synthesis and the lac Repressor. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 12993–13005 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Koropatkin, N. M., Cameron, E. a. & Martens, E. C. How glycan metabolism shapes the human gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 323–35 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Hungate, R. E. The Anaerobic Mesophilic Cellulolytic Bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. 14, 1–49 (1950).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Koropatkin, N. M. & Smith, T. J. SusG: a unique cell-membrane-associated alpha-amylase from a prominent human gut symbiont targets complex starch molecules. Structure 18, 200–215 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Hjalmar Permentier and Marcel de Vries at the Mass Spectrometry Facility ERIBA (University of Groningen) for their assistance with the proteomics analysis. L.D. acknowledges support from the Carbohydrate Competence Center CCC3 CarboHealth project. A.L.V.B. is funded by a VENI grant awarded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).

Author information




A.L.V.B. designed and performed all experiments with the assistance of M.M. and L.D., M.M. performed cloning of BtGH53 and assisted with growth experiments. S.V.L. purified hMOS samples, performed NMR analysis and assisted with Figure 1 preparation. A.L.V.B. made the figures and wrote the manuscript with the assistance of L.D.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alicia Lammerts van Bueren.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lammerts van Bueren, A., Mulder, M., Leeuwen, S. et al. Prebiotic galactooligosaccharides activate mucin and pectic galactan utilization pathways in the human gut symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. Sci Rep 7, 40478 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing