Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A Novel and Conserved Plasmodium Sporozoite Membrane Protein SPELD is Required for Maturation of Exo-erythrocytic Forms

Abstract

Plasmodium sporozoites are the infective forms of malaria parasite to vertebrate host and undergo dramatic changes in their transcriptional repertoire during maturation in mosquito salivary glands. We report here the role of a novel and conserved Plasmodium berghei protein encoded by PBANKA_091090 in maturation of Exo-erythrocytic Forms (EEFs) and designate it as Sporozoite surface Protein Essential for Liver stage Development (PbSPELD). PBANKA_091090 was previously annotated as PB402615.00.0 and its transcript was recovered at maximal frequency in the Serial Analysis of the Gene Expression (SAGE) of Plasmodium berghei salivary gland sporozoites. An orthologue of this transcript was independently identified in Plasmodium vivax sporozoite microarrays and was designated as Sporozoite Conserved Orthologous Transcript-2 (scot-2). Functional characterization through reverse genetics revealed that PbSPELD is essential for Plasmodium liver stage maturation. mCherry transgenic of PbSPELD localized the protein to plasma membrane of sporozoites and early EEFs. Global microarray analysis of pbspeld ko revealed EEF attenuation being associated with down regulation of genes central to general transcription, cell cycle, proteosome and cadherin signaling. pbspeld mutant EEFs induced pre-erythrocytic immunity with 50% protective efficacy. Our studies have implications for attenuating the human Plasmodium liver stages by targeting SPELD locus.

Introduction

Malaria is an infectious disease caused by a protozoan parasite that belongs to the genus Plasmodium. In 2013 alone, the reported mortality associated with malaria was about 854,586 cases1. Malaria is transmitted to humans by the bite of a female Anopheles mosquito that injects sporozoites into the skin of the host2. The sporozoites make their way to the liver where they transform into EEFs or liver stages. Following asexual exo-erythrocytic schizogony, the hepatic merozoites are released into the blood stream to initiate an erythrocytic cycle. During this phase, a proportion of parasites undergo differentiation to sexual forms called as gametocytes. When a female Anopheles mosquito ingests these gametocytes during the process of obtaining a blood meal, the male and female gametes fuse and result in the formation of a zygote. The zygote transforms into a motile ookinete that breaches the mosquito midgut epithelium and settles on hemocoel side of gut. The end product of sexual reproduction are the oocysts that undergo sporulation and upon rupture, release sporozoites into hemocoel3. The sporozoites migrate to the salivary glands and wait for transmission to humans when the mosquito probes for a blood meal.

High throughput methods of gene expression analysis have offered an insight in understanding the malaria parasite biology and allowed the appreciation of stage specifically regulated gene expression in modulating the infectivity or virulence of parasites4,5,6,7. Significant changes occur in the transcriptional repertoire of salivary gland sporozoites rendering them highly infective for hepatocytes8. The first comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of sporozoites9 opened the possibility of understanding the regulation of Plasmodium gene expression in mosquito stages that further led to investigating the differential gene expression between salivary gland sporozoite stages and other stages of Plasmodium using techniques like suppressive subtraction hybridization (SSH) to identify the transcripts uniquely upregulated in sporozoite stages. These studies led to the discovery of UIS genes8 and S genes10. Other independent studies have reported the analysis of expressed sequence tag (EST) data sets of salivary glands sporozoites and identified unique transcripts encoding secretory and membrane associated proteins important for sporozoites infectivity to hepatocytes11,12. Transcriptome of salivary gland sporozoite stage was also studied by Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE)13. In this analysis, 123 genes were identified out of which 66 were reported for the first time and were designated as SIS genes (new Sporozoite expressed genes Identified by SAGE)13. Clearly, the protein products encoded by these upregulated transcripts in sporozoite stage were important for regulation of parasite latency in salivary glands14, or functions central to motility15,16,17, cell traversal11,12,18,19, infectivity to hepatocytes20,21 liver stage development22,23,24,25,26,27 and egress28.

One of the highly recovered tags present in maximal abundance in the SAGE transcriptome analysis belonged to a gene that was newly annotated as PB402615.00.0 in that study13. The sequence of PB402615.00.0 aligned with the P. yoelli ESTs obtained from sporozoites and axenically developing EEF stages and its identified P. yoelli orthologue was PY02432. The current annotation of PB402615.00.0 in PlasmoDB is PBANKA_091090 and it encodes PbSPELD, as identified in this study. Based on the transcript abundance, pbspeld was grouped in a category13 that clustered frequency wise with previously described transcripts: UIS4, UIS78, S2310 and TRAP9 discovered through independently generated subtraction or cDNA libraries generated from salivary gland sporozoite stages. However, no functional investigation of pbspeld has been performed till to date. Aiming to identify the role of its product in sporozoite commitment to hepatocytes and in EEF development, we generated pbspeld ko and demonstrate for the first time the role of this gene product in EEF maturation, a function that is consistent with the expression of PbSPELD in mosquito sporozoite stage and very early liver stage. We further demonstrate that attenuated pbspeld mutants manifested an altered global transcriptional profile at 36 h where 552 genes were down regulated and 1201 genes were upregulated. We report the ability of pbspeld ko EEFs in generating both humoral and cell mediated immunity that conferred significant protection against sporozoite challenge.

Results

pbspeld is a single copy gene unique to Plasmodium species and contains transmembrane domain and tyrosine rich motifs

The PBANKA_091090 gene that codes for PbSPELD was identified as the most abundantly expressed sequence tag in the SAGE transcriptome analysis13. A BLAST search of the PlasmoDB using PbSPELD as query identified single homologs in other Plasmodium species (Fig. 1A), indicating that it is a single copy gene. Sequence analysis of homologues revealed that while P. vivax, P. cynomolgi, and P. knowlesi SPELD proteins share maximum identity; the rodent malaria parasite SPELD proteins are more closely related (81–88% sequence identity). Searches of Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/) and conserved domain database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi) using PbSPELD did not identify any conserved domain; BLAST search of the NCBI database of “non-redundant protein sequences” also did not yield any homolog, indicating that SPELD proteins are unique to Plasmodium. PbSPELD sequence was analysed for the presence of transmembrane regions using multiple programs (TMHMM, TMpred, DAS, TopPred2), which predicted a single transmembrane region that is shared by all SPELD proteins (Fig. 1A). The SPELD proteins contain a tyrosine-rich domain, and the most abundant amino acid is tyrosine (PbSPELD 13.6%, Pc SPELD 13.6%, Py SPELD 13.4%, Pcyn SPELD 14.9%, Pf SPELD 17.2%, Pk SPELD 14.9%, Pv SPELD 14.9%). Amino acid identities between the indicated proteins are shown in Fig. 1B. In silico analysis of SPELD protein sequence across rodent and human Plasmodium species is described in supplementary methods.

Figure 1: Alignment of amino acid sequence of SPELD orthologues and analysis of pbspeld gene expression across Plasmodium life cycle stages.
figure 1

(A) The amino acid sequence of PbSPELD was aligned with other Plasmodium orthologues P. chabaudi, PCHAS_0712200; P. yoelii, PY17X_0912300; P. cynomolgi, PCYB_094370; P. falciparum, PF3D7_1137800; P. knowlesi, PKNH_0936000 and P. vivax PVX_092505 using the Clustal Omega program. The conserved residues are shaded turquoise and physico-chemically similar residues are shaded grey. All orthologues contain a tyrosine-rich domain (underlined) and a putative transmembrane region (boxed). (B) The table shows amino acid identities between the indicated proteins. (C) The expression of pbspeld across P. berghei life cycle stages. The gene expression was analysed by quantitative real time PCR that revealed highest gene expression in the salivary gland sporozoites (SG Spz) followed by day 14 midgut sporozoites (MG Spz). The normalized data was expressed as a ratio of absolute copy numbers of pbspeld versus Pb18srRNA (internal control) for each stage of the Plasmodium life cycle. Ring: Ring stages, MBS: mixed blood stages, MG Spz: Midgut sporozoites, SG Spz: salivary gland sporozoites, LS16H: Liver stage 16 h, LS25H: Liver stage 25 h, LS42H: Liver stage 42 h, LS50H: Liver stage 50 h, LS65H: Liver stage 65 h.

pbspeld transcripts are highly expressed in salivary gland sporozoite stage

Quantification of pbspeld transcript by qRT PCR revealed maximal expression in salivary gland sporozoite stage followed by day 14 oocyst stage. The normalized gene expression for each stage as shown in Fig. 1C was obtained as a ratio of copy number of pbspeld/Pb18SrRNA. These studies were consistent with the maximal expression of PBANKA_091090 in transcriptomic analysis of P. berghei infected salivary gland sporozoites performed by SAGE analysis13.

Generation of pbspeld ko and P. berghei ANKA WT GFP transgenic line

To determine the function of pbspeld in the Plasmodium life cycle, its locus was successfully disrupted yielding a ko line. To achieve a double cross over (DCO) homologous recombination to replace pbspeld locus (Fig. 2A), the 5′ and 3′ flanking sequences were cloned on either ends of the GFP-hDHFR cassette and the targeting construct was electroporated into the schizont stage. The recombined locus has a GFP-hDHFR cassette in place of target gene (Fig. 2B). Genomic DNA was isolated from drug resistant GFP positive parasites and correct site specific integration was confirmed by primers designed at sites beyond recombination. Following limiting dilution, a diagnostic PCR was carried out from two clones- C1 and C2 obtained from two independent transfections that generated product of 863 bp amplified using primer set FP3/RP3 and product of 825 bp using primer set FP4/RP4 thus confirming correct 5′ and 3′ integrations (Fig. 2C). The same set of primers did not amplify product from WT genomic DNA (Fig. 2C). The clones C1 and C2 were further confirmed for the absence of pbspeld gene by performing a diagnostic PCR using primer set FP5/RP5 that amplified a product of 869 bp only from WT genomic DNA (Fig. 2D). For systematic comparison of the pbspeld ko phenotype at all life cycle stages with WT parasites, we generated a Pb ANKA WT GFP transgenic parasite line by integrating the GFP-hDHFR cassette at the non-essential P230p locus (Supplementary Fig. S1 and Supplementary method).

Figure 2: Generation of pbspeld ko parasite line and its phenotypic analysis in asexual blood stages and mosquito stages.
figure 2

(A) Genomic locus of pbspeld showing 5′ and 3′ regions and position of the primers are indicated by arrows. (B) Cloning of 5′ and 3′ regions in targeting vector pBC-GFP-hDHFR. (C) Agarose gel showing products of diagnostic PCR with primer set FP3/RP3 and FP4/RP4 indicating correct 5′ and 3′ integration respectively in pbspeld ko clone C1 and C2. No product was amplified from genomic DNA of WT parasites using same set of primers. (D) Agarose gel showing 395 bp product amplified with primer set FP5/RP5 within the pbspeld ORF from the genomic DNA of WT GFP parasite but not from pbspeld ko clone C1 and C2, confirming successful clonal dilution of ko line. (E) Asexual stages of pbspeld ko clone C1 and C2 propagate at similar rates as WT GFP parasites. (F) Mosquito stages of pbspeld ko does not show any defect in oocyst development, sporulation and in its ability to migrate to salivary glands. (i) Representative picture of mosquito midguts showing oocyst from WT GFP parasites and one of the pbspeld ko clone C1. Scale bar 200 μm. (ii) The frequency of oocyst per mosquito (n = 25/per group) in WT GFP, pbspeld ko clone C1 and C2. In each group, the horizontal line indicates mean ± SEM. (iii) Representative picture of oocyst from WT GFP and one of the pbspeld ko clone C1. Scale bar 20 μm. (iv) The average number of oocyst sporozoite from WT GFP, pbspeld ko clone C1 and C2. Values are mean ± SD (from 3 independent experiments, n = 25 mosquitoes/experiment). (v) Dissected salivary glands showing similar sporozoite loads from WT GFP and one of the pbspeld ko clone C1. Scale bar 200 μm. vi) The average number of salivary gland sporozoite from WT GFP, pbspeld ko clone C1 and C2. Values are mean ± SD (from 3 independent experiments, n = 25 mosquitoes/experiment).

pbspeld is not essential for asexual blood stage propagation and development of mosquito stages

To monitor if pbspeld depletion affected asexual blood stage development, two groups of BALB/c mice (3 mice/group) were intravenously injected with 103 infected RBCs of either WT GFP or clones C1 and C2 and the asexual blood stage propagation was monitored for 7 days by making Giemsa stained blood smears, on a daily basis. Both C1 and C2 clones propagated at similar rates as WT GFP parasites and showed all stages of asexual forms and sexual gametocyte stages. These observations revealed a non-essential role of PbSPELD in asexual blood propagation or commitment to form the gametocytes (Fig. 2E).

Transmission of pbspeld ko to mosquitoes resulted in formation of oocysts (day 14) at numbers comparable to those formed by the WT parasites. Shown in Fig. 2F(i) is a representative mosquito midgut harbouring oocysts derived from WT and clone C1 and Fig. 2F(ii) shows the frequency of the oocysts in clone C1 and C2 as compared to WT GFP line. The sporulation pattern inside oocyst in clone C1 was comparable to oocyst of the WT GFP line (Fig. 2F iii). The nearly similar oocyst sporozoite numbers recorded from clones C1 and C2 as compared to WT GFP revealed normal development of sporozoites in both mutant lines (Fig. 2F iv). The sporozoite load in intact salivary gland harbouring clone C1 was comparable to WT GFP (Fig. 2F v). The sporozoite numbers recorded from disrupted salivary glands containing clones C1 and C2 were also comparable to WT GFP (Fig. 2F vi). We conclude from these results that PbSPELD does not have a role in the developmental stages of Plasmodium that occur with in the Anopheles mosquito.

pbspeld ko sporozoites fail to initiate blood stage infection when malaria is transmitted by mosquito bite

Transmission of pbspeld ko sporozoites through mosquito bite did not initiate blood stage infection in four and two independent experiments performed respectively with clone C1 and C2 (Table 1). All blood meal positive mosquitoes that were used for transmission were dissected and majority of them had high loads of sporozoites in the salivary glands. Thus lack of break through infection was not due to absence of salivary gland sporozoites in the batch of mosquitoes used for transmission experiments. However high doses (2 × 104) of pbspeld ko sporozoites delivered through intravenously route led to occasional break through infection in both clones with a pre patent period of 9 days versus of 3.5 days for WT GFP line (Table 2). Since the delay of 1 day patency correlates to a 10 fold reduction in liver stage burden, the difference in patencies of pbspeld ko and WT parasites implicates a 105 fold less burden of mutants as compared to WT29.

Table 1 Transmission of pbspeld ko sporozoites through mosquito bite does not induce blood stage infection in mouse.
Table 2 High dose of pbspeld ko sporozoites delivered through intravenous (i.v) route induce an occasional break through infection in mice with delayed pre patent period.

The delayed prepatency in pbspeld ko is not associated with their inability to invade hepatocytes but due to growth arrest at mid liver stage development

The absence of blood stage infection in C57BL/6 mice exposed to mosquito bite or injection of pbspeld ko or an occasional break through infection in some mice implied either a compromised invasion of sporozoites into hepatocytes or inability of the invaded sporozoites to complete EEF development. To unravel which of these processes were affected in pbspeld mutants, we investigated the sporozoite infectivity both under in vitro and in vivo conditions. We first analysed the ability of sporozoites to glide under in vitro conditions (Supplementary Fig. S2A). We observed that pbspeld ko sporozoites were able to perform gliding motility that was indistinguishable from WT sporozoites. Next, we added 2 × 104 sporozoites of clone 1 or clone 2 to HepG2 cells and compared their rates of infection to that of WT GFP sporozoites. Two hours post infection the cells were fixed and a differential inside out staining of sporozoites was performed to quantify the number of intracellular sporozoites30. We observed that both clones C1 and C2 invaded with similar efficiency and the number of intracellular sporozoites were comparable to WT GFP sporozoites (Fig. 3A). We next introduced 1 × 104 sporozoites of clones C1 and C2 or WT GFP intravenously into mouse (3 mouse/group) and isolated livers at 15 hours post infection. Total RNA was obtained from infected livers and cDNA was synthesized. The cDNA was used for quantification of the Pb18SrRNA burden by qRT PCR. We noted almost similar parasite loads in liver infected with C1, C2 and WT GFP (Fig. 3B). We conclude that pbspeld depletion did not compromise hepatocyte trophism of the sporozoites and mutants behaved indistinguishably as WT with regards to commitment to hepatocyte infection. We next investigated the growth of both clones in HepG2 cells during different time points. HepG2 cells infected with both the mutant clones and WT sporozoites were fixed at indicated time points and stained with UIS4 antibody. The host and parasite nuclei were stained with DAPI. Both clones showed normal pattern of intracellular differentiation into EEFs at 12 hrs post infection of HepG2 cells and were similar in size to WT EEFs. At 36 hours the EEFs from both clones were smaller than WT, and the difference in size was more pronounced at 62 hrs time point (Fig. 3C) that revealed a distinct block in EEF development likely around 36 hr. The size of EEFs at each time point (n = 15) was measured for both clones as compared to WT GFP (Fig. 3D). Taken together, our results provide evidence for the role of pbspeld in maturation of EEFs.

Figure 3: The Exo-erythrocytic forms (EEFs) of pbspeld ko show arrested growth at mid liver stage development.
figure 3

(A) Quantification of sporozoite infectivity by inside out assay in WT GFP, pbspeld ko clone C1 and C2. (B) Quantification of parasite burden in liver of C57BL/6 mice following intravenous injection of 104 sporozoites of WT GFP, pbspeld ko clone C1 and C2 (n = 3 per group). (C) In vitro EEF development of WT GFP, pbspeld ko clone C1 and C2. Sporozoites were added to HepG2 cultures, and the development of EEFs was monitored at indicated post-invasion time points by IFA using UIS4 antibody specific for the parasitophorous vacuolar membrane (PVM) and DAPI that facilitated visualizing host and parasite nuclei. (D) Measurement of EEF area in WT GFP, pbspeld ko clone C1 and C2 at 12 h, 36 h and 62 h. Both pbspeld ko clone C1 and C2 show growth attenuation at 36 and 67 h (n = 15, ***p < 0.0005). Scale bar 10 μm.

Generation of pbspeldmCherry transgenic line

To study the expression and localization of the product encoded by pbspeld we generated mCherry transgenic line. The organization of the pbspeld locus is shown in Fig. 4A. To generate the targeting construct, the pbspeld ORF and 3′ UTR were amplified using primer sets FP6/RP6 and FP2/RP2 and the PCR products were cloned into pBC-mCherry-hDHFR vector using ApaI/XhoI and NotI/AscI restriction sites respectively. The targeting construct was released following digestion with ApaI and AscI and electroporated into schizonts. Following successful DCO, mCherry cassette is placed in frame with the pbspeld locus (Fig. 4B). The transfectants were subjected to limiting dilution and two clones- C1 and C2 from independent transfections were confirmed for correct integration using primer sets FP7/RP7 and FP8/RP8 that amplified respectively 771 bp and 819 bp products only in pbspeldmCherry transgenic and not from WT parasites (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4: Generation of pbspeldmCherry transgenic line and demonstration of reporter expression in midgut sporozoites, salivary gland sporozoites and in early developing EEFs.
figure 4

(A) Genomic locus of pbspeld showing ORF, 3′ region and position of the primers. (B) Cloning of ORF (without stop codon) and 3′ region in the targeting vector pBC-mCherry-hDHFR. The pbspeld ORF was PCR amplified using primer set FP6/RP6 and cloned into ApaI/XhoI site of the targeting vector. The 3′ region of pbspeld was PCR amplified using primer set FP2/RP2 and cloned in the NotI/AscI site of the targeting vector. (C) Agarose gel showing products of diagnostic PCR with primer set FP7/RP7 and primer set FP8/RP8 indicating correct integration respectively in pbspeldmCherry transgenic clones C1 and C2. No product was amplified from genomic DNA of WT parasites using same set of primers. (D) pbspeldmCherry transgenic parasites express the reporter in oocyst and salivary gland sporozoite stages. (i) Dissected mosquito midgut showing oocyst expressing mCherry. Scale bar 200 μm. (ii) Higher magnification (100X) of oocyst showing mCherry expression in sporozoites within oocyst. Scale bar 10 μm. (iii) Dissected salivary gland lobe showing sporozoites expressing mCherry. Scale bar 10 μm. (E) Circles with white outline indicate sporozoites showing SPELD mCherry localization to the plasma membrane with in dissected salivary gland lobes. Scale bar 5 μm. (F) and (G) Colocalisation of mCherry with CSP in midgut sporozoites and salivary gland sporozoites respectively. The sporozoites were incubated with 3D11, a monoclonal antibody that recognizes the repeats of P. berghei CSP protein. Scale bar 10 μm. (H) pbspeldmCherry transgenic express reporter only at 17 h EEF development. The development of EEFs was monitored at indicated post-invasion time points by IFA using UIS4 antibody specific for the parasitophorous vacuolar membrane (PVM) and DAPI that facilitated visualizing host and parasite nuclei. Scale bar 10 μm.

pbspeldm Cherry transgenics express reporter in oocyst sporozoite, salivary gland sporozoite and in early EEF stage

To study the mCherry expression and localization of the product encoded by pbspeldmCherry, one of the cloned transgenic lines C1 was infected to mouse and analyzed for the reporter expression by live fluorescence microscopy. We did not detect mCherry expression in the asexual stages, gametocyte stages and at stages 26–30 hrs post fertilization in mosquito midguts suggesting that pbspeld promotor was not active at these respective stages. However, at day 14, midgut oocysts (Fig. 4D i), sporozoites within oocyst (Fig. 4D ii) and at day 18–21, the salivary glands sporozoites (Fig. 4D iii) were all positive for reporter expression. Deconvoluted images of intact salivary glands harbouring sporozoites revealed the localization of mCherry to the sporozoite plasma membrane (Fig. 4E). The membrane associated mCherry colocalised with CSP in both midgut (Fig. 4F) and salivary gland sporozoites (Fig. 4G). We also observed the localization of mCherry to the membrane of developing EEF at 17 hrs (Fig. 4H) that colocalised with UIS4, a parasitophorous vacuolar membrane protein. However, no mcherry expression was associated with EEFs at 26, 36 and 62 hours post infection.

Immunization with pbspeld ko sporozoites generates pre-erythrocytic immunity

Since pbspeld ko sporozoites experience a block in mid liver stage development, we next tested the ability of the mutant sporozoites to mount a pre-erythrocytic immunity. Towards this end, we immunized C57BL/6 mice two times with 2 × 104 pbspeld ko sporozoites within an interval of 2 weeks. Ten days after final immunization, all mice were challenged with 2 × 104 WT sporozoites. Analysis of prepatent period in three independent experiments from clone 1 and 2 independent experiments from clone 2 revealed that nearly 50% of the immunized mice were protected from challenge (Supplementary Table 1). We conclude that a prime boost immunization regimen with pbspeld ko sporozoites induces immunity whose efficacy is nearly 50%. We next investigated if anti-sporozoites antibodies contributed to protection. We performed sporozoite IFA using pooled immune sera (obtained from mouse immunized with clone 1 and 2) that showed positive immunoreactivity in the range of 1:1600-1:3200 (Supplementary Fig. S2B, C and D). Further to test the sporozoite neutralizing ability of the immune sera, C57BL/6 mice were challenged with WT sporozoites incubated in immune sera. A significant delay in prepatent period that ranged from day 5.5 to day 6 was observed in mice that received sporozoites exposed to immune sera as compared to day 3.5 to 4 observed for mice that received sporozoites incubated in pre-immune sera (Supplementary Table 2). We implicate this delay in prepatent period to the ability of immune sera to partially neutralize the infectivity of sporozoites prior to hepatocyte invasion. Further, in vitro neutralization of WT P. berghei ANKA sporozoites in immune sera prior to its addition in HepG2 cells showed nearly 2 fold reduction in the EEF burden as measured by quantification of Pb18SrRNA copy number (Supplementary Fig. S2E). Our observations that pbspeld ko sporozoites glide in a similar manner as WT may explain the ability of these sporozoites to generate humoral response against secretory antigens (Supplementary Fig. S2A). Our results implicate that pbspeld mutant sporozoites induce protection through generation of partially protective anti-sporozoite antibodies.

Microarray of pbspeld ko liver stage revealed dramatic changes in the global gene expression

Growth arrest of pbspeld ko parasites in mid liver stage and its inability to initiate a timely blood stage infection led us to analyze the global gene expression in the mutants. Microarray revealed major changes in the gene expression of pbspeld ko EEFs that showed upregulation of 1201 genes and downregulation of 552 genes (Fig. 5A). The important functional pathways up and down-regulated are indicated in pie diagram (Fig. 5B and C). The functional clusters that were upregulated belonged to nucleotide excision repair, ubiquitin mediated proteolysis, DNA replication, fatty acid synthesis, purine metabolism and mRNA splicing (Supplementary Fig. S3A). The important clusters that were downregulated belonged to general transcription by RNA pol 1, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, spliceosome pathway and ribosomal genes (Supplementary Fig. S3B), cadherin signaling pathway, cell cycle pathway, proteosome pathway and oxidative phosphorylation pathway (Supplementary Fig. S3C). Consistent with the attenuation of the pbspeld ko during mid liver stage, several liver stage specific transcripts like UIS4, LISP2, EXP1, FABL and SERA4 were significantly downregulated (Fig. 5D). The down regulation of few selected genes like LISP2, UIS4, FABL and EXP1 were further validated by qRT-PCR (Fig. 5E). Amongst other downregulated genes were the putative orthologues of P. yoelli that were shown to be induced at different time points (24 hrs, 40 hrs and 50 hrs) in the transcriptomic studies of the in vivo late liver stages31. These included enolase (PBANKA_121430), receptor activated c-kinase (RACK) (PBANKA_070390), protein disulfide isomerase (PBANKA_070280), endoplasmin (GRP94) (PBANKA_142730), peptidyl-prolylcis-trans isomerase (PBANKA_121650), 1-cys peroxiredoxin (PBANKA_122800), proteosome subunit alpha type 6 (PBANKA_122310), biotin carboxylase subunit of acetyl CoA carboxylase (PBANKA_133280) and heat shock protein 110 (PBANKA_121930) (Supplementary Fig. S3D). The complete microarray data set is accessible from the NCBI GEO database (accession GSE72399) and GEO accession at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE72399. The differential changes in the gene expression of pbspeld mutants as observed in the microarray analysis were further validated by performing qRT-PCR. Four genes each selected from upregulated and down regulated category showed similar trend in qRT-PCR expression analysis (Supplementary Fig. S4A and Fig. 4SB). The global changes in the gene expression of several functional clusters of likely reflects the compromised EEF development in pbspeld mutants.

Figure 5: Microarray of 36 hrs liver stages of WT and pbspeld ko.
figure 5

(A) Heat map showing global gene expression changes in P. berghei liver stages at 36 hrs from WT and pbspeld ko. B) Pie diagram indicating the major functional pathways upregulated (B) and downregulated (C) in pbspeld ko. (D) Few of the well characterised liver stage specific genes downregulated in pbspeld ko. The plasmoDB ID of each of these genes with their probable functions are indicated. (E) Quantitative real time PCR showing downregulation of transcripts: LISP2, UIS4, FABL and EXP1 in pbspeld ko. (*p < 0.05,**p < 0.005, ***p < 0.0005 as compared to WT).

Discussion

Malaria transmission to vertebrates occurs when female Anopheles mosquitoes introduces sporozoites into the skin of the vertebrate host while probing for a blood meal2. Following successful invasion of sporozoites into hepatocytes, they transform into EEFs inside a parasitophorous vacuole, a membrane bound structure partly derived from host plasma membrane and secretory proteins released by the invading sporozoites32. While the pre-erythrocytic stages are clinically silent, they however lead to onset of blood stage infections that are associated with all pathological manifestations of malaria. Therefore, blocking sporozoite entry into hepatocytes or transformation of sporozoites into EEFs in order to preclude blood stage infection has been an active area of research. Towards this end, deciphering the function of hypothetical genes highly upregulated in sporozoite stages have been rigorously pursued in recent past leading to understanding of several aspects of the Plasmodium pre-erythrocytic biology. Arguably, this pursuit has led to creation of single22,33 double34 and triply attenuated parasites35 whose efficacy as a whole organism pre-erythrocytic vaccines have been successfully proved. In the current study, we investigated the role of PBANKA_191090 in pre-erythrocytic stages owing to its high transcription in salivary gland as determined through SAGE analysis13 and show that it is essential for maturation of EEFs.

The sporozoite membrane localization of PbSPELD is consistent with our in silico analysis that predicted transmembrane domain in its amino acid sequence. Our observations also concur with the proteomic analysis of sporozoite surface proteins that detected the orthologues of PbSPELD in both P. yoelli [Py: PY02432] and P. falciparum sporozoites (Pf: PF11_0545)36,37. Consistent with these results, PbSPELD colocalised with CSP, a major sporozoite surface protein38. However, unlike the known role of CSP in commitment of sporozoites to hepatocytes, PbSPELD was not required for invasion to hepatocyte as the mutant sporozoites invaded and initiated transformation normally both in the HepG2 cells and in liver hepatocytes. Interestingly the ko manifested a phenotype at a time point beyond supposed expression of the protein. It is only speculative that the mid liver stage development block may be associated in a yet unknown manner to protein function in sporozoite stages. Thus the early expression of PbSPELD in sporulating oocyst and salivary gland sporozoites is likely needed only to facilitate the sporozoite maturation within hepatocytes rather than its role in invasion of salivary glands or hepatocytes.

Much of global changes observed in transcriptome of pbspeld ko may not be a direct consequence of its depletion, but rather a secondary or indirect effect, induced by the lack of EEF maturation in the absence of PbSPELD. These changes likely reflected the steady state levels of transcripts at the time point that corresponded to the growth arrest. Downregulation of genes central to ribosome functions, general transcription by RNA polymerase 1, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, cell cycle pathway, oxidative phosphorylation, proteasome in pbspeld ko may be a consequence of premature termination of the liver stages prior to completion of schizogony. Many gene products like UIS423, LISP239, EXP140, FABL41 and SERA442 are essential for maintenance of EEF as it progressively matures and down regulation of their expression provided a solid evidence for attenuation of EEFs in pbspeld mutants. The upregulation of certain genes clusters mediating mRNA splicing pathway, ubiquitin mediated proteolysis, nucleotide excision repair, DNA repair, purine metabolism pathway as observed in our microarrays analysis may be a consequence of the indirect effects of PbSPELD depletion and merits further investigation.

Several lines of evidence indicate that sporozoites attenuated either by irradiation or by genetic means induce protective immune responses43. The immune effectors involved are gamma interferons, antibodies and T cells44,45 and protective immunity generated is independent of the mode of attenuation46. The ability of the liver arrested parasites to induce protective CD8+ T cell immunity is reliant on exported antigens capable of activating T cell response47. Alternatively, cross presentation of antigens by liver resident professional antigen presenting cells have been shown following acquisition of infected hepatocytes harbouring aborted Plasmodium EEFs48. The complete protection associated with 50% of immunised mice upon challenge with WT sporozoites was indicative of powerful T cell response, and the relative contribution of different T cell subsets to this protection is currently under investigation. Additionally, the presence of anti-sporozoite neutralizing antibodies that partially block the infectivity of sporozoites coincided with the reactivity of the immune sera on WT sporozoite surface. Taken together, these observations point to the ability of pbspeld mutants in generating pre-erythrocytic immunity.

The extreme recalcitrance of pbspeld ko to complete liver stage schizogony even under high dose of sporozoite inoculation implicates that PbSPELD depletion leads to high degree of liver stage attenuation. While merosome formation remains as the predominant mode of merozoite release from hepatocytes harbouring mature EEFs49, Baer et al., observed an alternative method of merozoite release from EEFs undergoing decay50. This phenomenon was recorded as early as 42 h after sporozoite infection, hours before merozoite differentiation begins and was regardless of EEF maturity and associated with the abortive liver stage development. While, SPELD showed a mid liver stage block in development, nonetheless, at 36 h time point we still detected limited schizogony. We propose that the abortive EEFs that under went few rounds of nuclear division may still release merozoites that may lead to occasional break through infection. The fact that this mode of merozoite release was also a rare event in pbspeld ko line is evident from the delay in the prepatent period to 9 days.

In conclusion, we propose pbspeld locus as a vulnerable target for malaria intervention. Based on sporozoite surface localization data, further studies are warranted if it can be a target of neutralizing antibodies. The association of PbSPELD on PVM during early EEF development and its absolute requirement in EEF maturation may suggest a speculative role of PbSPELD in nutrient acquisition and protein export51,52. Inability of these mutants to complete EEF development may likely be a consequence of one or more of these processes being compromised and merits further investigation. Having orthologues in other human species of Plasmodium36,53, it will be interesting to investigate if speld can be an additional candidate to achieve attenuation of human malaria liver stage parasites through targeted gene disruption.

Methods

Ethics Statement

Animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee at University of Hyderabad (approval no: UH/SLS/IAEC/2014-1/9b and UH/SLS/IAEC/2014-1/9c.) and CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute (approval no: IAEC/2013/83), India. Maintenance and care of animals was in accordance with guidelines of the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA), Government of India.

RNA isolation from different stages of P. berghei ANKA and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was isolated from different stages of the parasite using RNA isolation kit (Life Technologies) following manufacturer’s instructions. For cDNA synthesis, 2 μg of RNA was reverse transcribed in a reaction mixture containing 1X PCR buffer, 2.5 mM dNTPs, 5 mM MgCl2, 1.5 units RNAse inhibitor, 2.5 mM random hexamers and 1.5 units reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystem). pbspeld transcript levels were quantified by real time PCR using primer pairs RT FP and RT RP. Pb18SrRNA was used as internal control to normalize the gene expression data54,55.

Construction of the pbspeld (PBANKA_091090) ko targeting vector

For successful replacement pbspeld locus, a 586 bp of 5′ and 568 bp of 3′ fragments that flanked the target gene were amplified and cloned into the targeting vector pBC-GFP-hDHFR at XhoI/ClaI and NotI/AscI sites respectively. Amplification of the 5′ and 3′ fragment was done using primers FP1-RP1 and FP2-RP2 respectively. Vector backbone was removed from the targeting cassette by digesting with XhoI/AscI.

Transfection and confirmation of pbspeld ko by site-specific integration PCR

P. berghei transfections were done essentially as described earlier56. Two independent transfections (T1 and T2) were performed with the targeting construct. The transfected parasites were injected intravenously into mouse and following 24 hrs of injection, the mice were kept on pyrimethamine (Sigma. After selection, when the parasitemia reached around 5%, genomic DNA was isolated from transfected (T1 and T2) P. berghei blood stages using a genomic DNA isolation kit (Genetix), following manufacturer’s instructions. To confirm the site-specific integration of the pbspeld ko construct, PCR was performed using gDNA as a template. Diagnostic primers were designed, such that the forward primer FP3 flanked upstream of the 5′ recombined fragment and the reverse primer RP3 flanked within the GFP cassette. A second set of diagnostic primers were designed where the forward primer FP4 flanked within the hDHFR cassette and reverse primer RP4 flanked a sequence beyond the site of 3′ fragment integration. Following this confirmation, clonal lines of the ko was generated by process of parasite limiting dilution. Single clones were further confirmed by diagnostic PCR using forward primer FP5 and reverse primer RP5 designed within the target gene ORF.

Transmission of pbspeld ko and P. berghei WT GFP parasites to Anopheles mosquitoes

Female Anopheles mosquitoes were allowed to obtain blood meal from mouse harbouring gametocytes of either WT GFP or speld ko line. The infected mosquito cage was placed in a chamber maintained at 20 °C and 80% RH for 18–22 days to facilitate the completion of sexual development and for the formation of salivary gland sporozoites. Successful transmission of parasites to mosquitoes was monitored by observing the oocysts on mosquito midguts on day 14. To obtain the salivary glands sporozoites, mosquitoes were dissected and salivary glands were isolated post day 18 of feeding. The glands were disrupted by crushing and the sporozoites numbers were enumerated using hemocytometer.

Gliding motility assay

Sporozoites were added to Lab-Tek wells pre-coated with mAb 3D11 for 1 h at 37 °C and assay was performed as described earlier57. After incubation, medium was removed and wells were fixed and stained with biotinylated mAb 3D11 followed by streptavidin-FITC (Sigma) in order to visualize the CS protein-containing trails.

Sporozoite invasion assay

HepG2 cells were seeded in eight-chambered Lab-Tek wells that were coated with collagen type 1 from Rat tail (BD Bioscience). Sporozoites (2 × 104) were added per well and after 1 h at 37 °C, the cells were washed, fixed, and sporozoites were stained with a double-staining assay that distinguishes intracellular from extracellular sporozoites30.

Quantitative determination of in vivo infectivity

Female C57BL/6 mice were infected by intravenous injection of 1 × 104 sporozoites and parasite load in each mouse liver was determined 15 hrs post infection by real time PCR58. The primers used for amplification of P. berghei 18SrRNA were Pb18SrRNA-F and Pb18SrRNA-R.

In vitro EEF development and Immunofluorescence assay (IFA)

For obtaining the EEFs, the HepG2 cells were cultured in 24 well culture plates (Corning). When HepG2 cells reached 60–70% confluency, 2 × 104 sporozoites were added per well. Cultures were fixed at different time points of EEF development and IFA was performed as described earlier59. Briefly, the cultures were incubated for 1 h with UIS4 antibody and immunoreactivity reveled by anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 594 (Life Technologies). The HepG2 and parasite nuclei were stained with DAPI. After final wash the coverslips were mounted using antifade reagent (Life Technologies). To reveal the stage specific expression and localization of the reporter in the pbspeldmCherry transgenics, the oocyst and salivary gland sporozoites were fixed and stained with 3D11 monoclonal antibody38 which reacted with the CSP, a major surface protein of sporozoite. The CSP immunoreactivity was revealed by using antimouse antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488. To monitor the expression of mCherry in the developing liver stages, 2 × 104 pbspeldmCherry transgenic sporozoites were added to HepG2 cultures and harvested at different time points. All processed slides were visualised using a Nikon (Ni-E AR) upright fluorescent microscope. Images were procured using monochrome camera (Andor) and captured images were processed using software NIS elements AR.

Generation of mCherry transgenic parasites for studying the localization of SPELD

A 614 bp of pbspeld ORF was amplified (without stop codon) using primer pair FP6-RP6. A 568 bp of 3′UTR of pbspeld was PCR amplified using primer pair FP2-RP2. Both pbspeld ORF and 3′ UTR were cloned into pBC-mCherry-hDHFR vector using ApaI/XhoI and NotI/AscI restriction sites respectively. The targeting construct was separated from vector back bone and transfection was performed as described in earlier section. After obtaining successful transfectants, 5′ and 3′ integration was confirmed by using primer pair FP7-RP7 and FP8-RP8 respectively. Primer sequences are given in Supplementary Table 3.

Analysis of protective efficacy of pbspeld ko sporozoite immunisation

Six to eight weeks old C57BL/6 mice were immunized twice with 2 × 104 pbspeld ko sporozoites. As an appropriate control, we immunized another group of mice (n = 6) with crushed lysates of uninfected salivary gland that served as mock immunized group. The duration between priming and boosting was 14 days. Ten days after boosting, a group of 6 immunised and naïve mice were challenged with 2 × 104P. berghei WT sporozoites. The prepatent period was determined by performing Giemsa staining of blood smears from day 3 post infection.

To determine sporozoite antibody titers, sera were collected from a group of 6 immunized mice prior to challenge. The sera were pooled and diluted in the range of 1:50 to 1:100,000. Wild type sporozoites obtained from dissected salivary glands were spotted on multiwell slides and incubated with different dilutions of pooled immune sera. Sporozoites were incubated in parallel, either with pre immune sera or 3D11 monoclonal antibody38 against CSP which were considered as negative and positive controls respectively. The sporozoite immunoreactivity was revealed using anti-mouse antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488.

Sporozoite neutralization assay

Sera obtained from mice that were twice immunized with speld ko sporozoites were pooled and used for performing sporozoite neutralization assays. In brief 6 × 104P. berghei ANKA WT sporozoites were incubated at room temperature in 50 μl of either pre-immune or immune sera. Following 35 minutes of incubation, the samples were diluted with incomplete DMEM and made up to 600 μl. Two groups of C57BL/6 mice (3/group) received 2 × 104 sporozoites intravenously incubated either in pre immune or immune sera and their pre patent periods were monitored from day 3 post injections.

Microarray of pbspeld ko EEFs

For microarray analysis of speld mutants, an Agilent Custom Plasmodium berghei gene expression microarray slide having 4 × 44k format designed by Genotypic Technology Private Limited was used that comprised of a total number of 43803 features including 5155 numbers of probes, and 1417 Agilent control features. The array covered 5106 number of transcripts that were sourced from Plasmodb database. The details of microarray hybridization, Scanning and data analysis is given in supplementary methods.

Quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR) for validation of microarray data

To validate the expression of the genes up and down regulated in microarray, HepG2 cells were infected with WT and pbspeld ko sporozoites as described above and incubated for 36 hrs. For the gene copy number measurements RNA was isolated from cells and cDNA was made followed by quantitative PCR. The primer sequences of the genes that were validated by qRT-PCR is given in supplementary Table 4.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Al-Nihmi, F. M. A. et al. A Novel and Conserved Plasmodium Sporozoite Membrane Protein SPELD is Required for Maturation of Exo-erythrocytic Forms. Sci. Rep. 7, 40407; doi: 10.1038/srep40407 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1

    Murray, C. J. et al. Global, regional, and national incidence and mortality for HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 384, 1005–1070, doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60844-8 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Sinnis, P. & Zavala, F. The skin stage of malaria infection: biology and relevance to the malaria vaccine effort. Future Microbiol 3, 275–278 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Matuschewski, K. Getting infectious: formation and maturation of Plasmodium sporozoites in the Anopheles vector. Cell Microbiol 8, 1547–1556 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Le Roch, K. G. et al. Discovery of gene function by expression profiling of the malaria parasite life cycle. Science 301, 1503–1508 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Le Roch, K. G. et al. Global analysis of transcript and protein levels across the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. Genome Res 14, 2308–2318 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Hall, N. et al. A comprehensive survey of the Plasmodium life cycle by genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic analyses. Science 307, 82–86 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Zhou, Y. et al. Evidence-based annotation of the malaria parasite’s genome using comparative expression profiling. PLoS One 3, e1570 (2008).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Matuschewski, K. et al. Infectivity-associated changes in the transcriptional repertoire of the malaria parasite sporozoite stage. J Biol Chem 277, 41948–41953 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Kappe, S. H. et al. Exploring the transcriptome of the malaria sporozoite stage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 9895–9900 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Kaiser, K., Matuschewski, K., Camargo, N., Ross, J. & Kappe, S. H. Differential transcriptome profiling identifies Plasmodium genes encoding pre-erythrocytic stage-specific proteins. Mol Microbiol 51, 1221–1232 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Ishino, T., Yano, K., Chinzei, Y. & Yuda, M. Cell-passage activity is required for the malarial parasite to cross the liver sinusoidal cell layer. PLoS Biol 2, E4 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Ishino, T., Chinzei, Y. & Yuda, M. A Plasmodium sporozoite protein with a membrane attack complex domain is required for breaching the liver sinusoidal cell layer prior to hepatocyte infection. Cell Microbiol 7, 199–208 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Rosinski-Chupin, I. et al. Serial Analysis of Gene Expression in Plasmodium berghei salivary gland sporozoites. BMC Genomics 8, 466 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Zhang, M. et al. The Plasmodium eukaryotic initiation factor-2alpha kinase IK2 controls the latency of sporozoites in the mosquito salivary glands. J Exp Med 207, 1465–1474 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Sultan, A. A. et al. TRAP is necessary for gliding motility and infectivity of plasmodium sporozoites. Cell 90, 511–522 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Steinbuechel, M. & Matuschewski, K. Role for the Plasmodium sporozoite-specific transmembrane protein S6 in parasite motility and efficient malaria transmission. Cell Microbiol 11, 279–288 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Harupa, A. et al. SSP3 is a novel Plasmodium yoelii sporozoite surface protein with a role in gliding motility. Infect Immun 82, 4643–4653 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Kariu, T., Ishino, T., Yano, K., Chinzei, Y. & Yuda, M. CelTOS, a novel malarial protein that mediates transmission to mosquito and vertebrate hosts. Mol Microbiol 59, 1369–1379 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Bhanot, P., Schauer, K., Coppens, I. & Nussenzweig, V. A surface phospholipase is involved in the migration of plasmodium sporozoites through cells. J Biol Chem 280, 6752–6760 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Labaied, M., Camargo, N. & Kappe, S. H. Depletion of the Plasmodium berghei thrombospondin-related sporozoite protein reveals a role in host cell entry by sporozoites. Mol Biochem Parasitol 153, 158–166 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Ishino, T., Chinzei, Y. & Yuda, M. Two proteins with 6-cys motifs are required for malarial parasites to commit to infection of the hepatocyte. Mol Microbiol 58, 1264–1275 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Mueller, A. K., Labaied, M., Kappe, S. H. & Matuschewski, K. Genetically modified Plasmodium parasites as a protective experimental malaria vaccine. Nature 433, 164–167 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Mueller, A. K. et al. Plasmodium liver stage developmental arrest by depletion of a protein at the parasite-host interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 3022–3027 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Aly, A. S. et al. Targeted deletion of SAP1 abolishes the expression of infectivity factors necessary for successful malaria parasite liver infection. Mol Microbiol 69, 152–163 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Silvie, O., Goetz, K. & Matuschewski, K. A sporozoite asparagine-rich protein controls initiation of Plasmodium liver stage development. PLoS Pathog 4, e1000086 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Aly, A. S., Lindner, S. E., MacKellar, D. C., Peng, X. & Kappe, S. H. SAP1 is a critical post-transcriptional regulator of infectivity in malaria parasite sporozoite stages. Mol Microbiol 79, 929–939 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Annoura, T. et al. Two Plasmodium 6-Cys family-related proteins have distinct and critical roles in liver-stage development. Faseb J 28, 2158–2170 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Burda, P. C. et al. A Plasmodium phospholipase is involved in disruption of the liver stage parasitophorous vacuole membrane. PLoS Pathog 11, e1004760 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Gantt, S. M. et al. Proteasome inhibitors block development of Plasmodium spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42, 2731–2738 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Renia, L. et al. Malaria sporozoite penetration. A new approach by double staining. J Immunol Methods 112, 201–205 (1988).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Tarun, A. S. et al. A combined transcriptome and proteome survey of malaria parasite liver stages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 305–310 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Mota, M. M. et al. Migration of Plasmodium sporozoites through cells before infection. Science 291, 141–144 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    van Schaijk, B. C. et al. Gene disruption of Plasmodium falciparum p52 results in attenuation of malaria liver stage development in cultured primary human hepatocytes. PLoS One 3, e3549 (2008).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Labaied, M. et al. Plasmodium yoelii sporozoites with simultaneous deletion of P52 and P36 are completely attenuated and confer sterile immunity against infection. Infect Immun 75, 3758–3768 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Mikolajczak, S. A. et al. A next-generation genetically attenuated Plasmodium falciparum parasite created by triple gene deletion. Mol Ther 22, 1707–1715 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Lindner, S. E. et al. Total and putative surface proteomics of malaria parasite salivary gland sporozoites. Mol Cell Proteomics 12, 1127–1143 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Swearingen, K. E. et al. Interrogating the Plasmodium Sporozoite Surface: Identification of Surface-Exposed Proteins and Demonstration of Glycosylation on CSP and TRAP by Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics. PLoS Pathog 12, e1005606, doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005606 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Yoshida, N., Nussenzweig, R. S., Potocnjak, P., Nussenzweig, V. & Aikawa, M. Hybridoma produces protective antibodies directed against the sporozoite stage of malaria parasite. Science 207, 71–73 (1980).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Orito, Y. et al. Liver-specific protein 2: a Plasmodium protein exported to the hepatocyte cytoplasm and required for merozoite formation. Mol Microbiol 87, 66–79 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Graewe, S. et al. Hostile takeover by Plasmodium: reorganization of parasite and host cell membranes during liver stage egress. PLoS Pathog 7, e1002224 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Yu, M. et al. The fatty acid biosynthesis enzyme FabI plays a key role in the development of liver-stage malarial parasites. Cell Host Microbe 4, 567–578 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Schmidt-Christensen, A., Sturm, A., Horstmann, S. & Heussler, V. T. Expression and processing of Plasmodium berghei SERA3 during liver stages. Cell Microbiol 10, 1723–1734 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Bijker, E. M. et al. Novel approaches to whole sporozoite vaccination against malaria. Vaccine 33, 7462–7468, doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.09.095 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Schofield, L. et al. Gamma interferon, CD8+ T cells and antibodies required for immunity to malaria sporozoites. Nature 330, 664–666, doi: 10.1038/330664a0 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Nardin, E., Zavala, F., Nussenzweig, V. & Nussenzweig, R. S. Pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccine: mechanisms of protective immunity and human vaccine trials. Parassitologia 41, 397–402 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Kumar, K. A., Baxter, P., Tarun, A. S., Kappe, S. H. & Nussenzweig, V. Conserved protective mechanisms in radiation and genetically attenuated uis3(-) and uis4(-) Plasmodium sporozoites. PLoS One 4, e4480, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004480 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Montagna, G. N. et al. Antigen export during liver infection of the malaria parasite augments protective immunity. MBio 5, e01321–01314, doi: 10.1128/mBio.01321-14 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Leiriao, P., Mota, M. M. & Rodriguez, A. Apoptotic Plasmodium-infected hepatocytes provide antigens to liver dendritic cells. J Infect Dis 191, 1576–1581 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Sturm, A. et al. Manipulation of host hepatocytes by the malaria parasite for delivery into liver sinusoids. Science 313, 1287–1290, doi: 10.1126/science.1129720 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Baer, K., Klotz, C., Kappe, S. H., Schnieder, T. & Frevert, U. Release of hepatic Plasmodium yoelii merozoites into the pulmonary microvasculature. PLoS Pathog 3, e171, doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030171 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Lingelbach, K. & Joiner, K. A. The parasitophorous vacuole membrane surrounding Plasmodium and Toxoplasma: an unusual compartment in infected cells. J Cell Sci 111 (Pt 11), 1467–1475 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Spielmann, T., Montagna, G. N., Hecht, L. & Matuschewski, K. Molecular make-up of the Plasmodium parasitophorous vacuolar membrane. Int J Med Microbiol 302, 179–186 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Westenberger, S. J. et al. A systems-based analysis of Plasmodium vivax lifecycle transcription from human to mosquito. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4, e653 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Kumar, K. A., Oliveira, G. A., Edelman, R., Nardin, E. & Nussenzweig, V. Quantitative Plasmodium sporozoite neutralization assay (TSNA). J Immunol Methods 292, 157–164 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Vaughan, A. M. et al. Type II fatty acid synthesis is essential only for malaria parasite late liver stage development. Cell Microbiol 11, 506–520 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Janse, C. J., Ramesar, J. & Waters, A. P. High-efficiency transfection and drug selection of genetically transformed blood stages of the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei. Nat Protoc 1, 346–356 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Mishra, S., Nussenzweig, R. S. & Nussenzweig, V. Antibodies to Plasmodium circumsporozoite protein (CSP) inhibit sporozoite’s cell traversal activity. J Immunol Methods 377, 47–52, doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.01.009 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Bruna-Romero, O. et al. Detection of malaria liver-stages in mice infected through the bite of a single Anopheles mosquito using a highly sensitive real-time PCR. Int J Parasitol 31, 1499–1502 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Kumar, K. A. et al. Exposure of Plasmodium sporozoites to the intracellular concentration of potassium enhances infectivity and reduces cell passage activity. Mol Biochem Parasitol 156, 32–40 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Dr. Robert Menard (Institute Pasteur) for pBC-GFP-DHFR and Dr. Volker Heussler (University of Bern) for PL0017 vector. We thank Dr. Photini Sinnis (Johns Hopkins University) for UIS4 antibody. KAK acknowledges Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, for financial support (SR/SO/HS-122/2008). SM acknowledges DBT Ramalingaswami Fellowship grant (GAP0142) and CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute for financial support. CDRI manuscript no. 9390.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: K.A.K. and S.M. Performed the experiments: F.M.A.A., S.K.K., R.R.S., B.S.M., J.T., M.M., R.G., S.M. and K.A.K. Analyzed the data: F.M.A.A., S.K.K., R.R.S., B.S.M., J.T., M.M., R.G., S.M. and K.A.K. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: P.S.S. Wrote the manuscript: P.S.S., S.M. and K.A.K. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Satish Mishra or Kota Arun Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Nihmi, F., Kolli, S., Reddy, S. et al. A Novel and Conserved Plasmodium Sporozoite Membrane Protein SPELD is Required for Maturation of Exo-erythrocytic Forms. Sci Rep 7, 40407 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40407

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40407

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing