Imaging molecular geometry with electron momentum spectroscopy

Abstract

Electron momentum spectroscopy is a unique tool for imaging orbital-specific electron density of molecule in momentum space. However, the molecular geometry information is usually veiled due to the single-centered character of momentum space wavefunction of molecular orbital (MO). Here we demonstrate the retrieval of interatomic distances from the multicenter interference effect revealed in the ratios of electron momentum profiles between two MOs with symmetric and anti-symmetric characters. A very sensitive dependence of the oscillation period on interatomic distance is observed, which is used to determine F-F distance in CF4 and O-O distance in CO2 with sub-Ångström precision. Thus, using one spectrometer, and in one measurement, the electron density distributions of MOs and the molecular geometry information can be obtained simultaneously. Our approach provides a new robust tool for imaging molecules with high precision and has potential to apply to ultrafast imaging of molecular dynamics if combined with ultrashort electron pulses in the future.

Introduction

The physical and chemical properties of molecules directly depend on their geometries and electronic structures that both have always been the central issues in molecular physics. The geometry of a molecule is conventionally obtained by the methods of X-ray1,2 or electron diffraction3,4,5,6, from which the atomic positions are determined with sub-Ångström spatial resolution. An alternative imaging approach emerged in the past decade, which is referred to as the laser induced electron diffraction7,8,9,10,11, has also been demonstrated to image molecular structures with sub-Ångström precision. In this technique, an intense laser field is employed to extract electron from a molecule itself, and within one laser period a fraction of the tunneled electron wave packet will be forced back to re-collide and diffract from the parent molecular ion. The well-established method in the conventional electron diffraction is then applicable to retrieve the bond lengths of molecule.

On the other hand, the tunneled electron wave packet that directly emerges into the vacuum retains information about the orbital from which the electron is ionized9. By measuring the momentum distribution for these direct electrons, the fingerprint of the highest occupied molecular orbital can be observed through the filter of the suppressed binding potential through which the electron tunnels9. Thus one set of measurements simultaneously identifies the orbital wavefunction of molecule and the position of the atoms in the molecule in this laser induced electron tunneling and diffraction technique. Information about the ionizing orbital of neutral molecule is also imprinted on the high-harmonic radiation produced by the recombination of the re-collision electron with the parent ion in the laser field and allows the three-dimensional shape of the highest electronic orbital to be measured12.

Electron momentum spectroscopy (EMS), which is based on the electron-impact single ionization or (e, 2e) experiment near the Bethe ridge, is a well-established technique that can obtain the spherically averaged electron momentum distributions, or electron momentum profiles (see Supplementary Information Note 1), for any individual molecular orbitals (MOs) in principle13,14,15. This unique ability of imaging MOs makes the EMS a robust technique for exploring the electronic structures of molecules in gas phase16. However, the geometry information of molecule is usually veiled due to the single-centered character of the momentum space wavefunction for MO. In momentum space, for a MO which can be approximated by a linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAOs), the information about the equilibrium nuclear positions RJ is only present in the phase factors exp(−ipRJ) introduced by Fourier transform of the wavefunction from position space to momentum space (see Methods for details). Therefore the electron momentum distribution of a MO will be modulated by a cosine or sine function with periodicity of 2, where is the distance between atoms Ja and Jb. This oscillation phenomenon is usually referred to as bond oscillation17, which can also be regarded as a result of the Cohen-Fano type18 or the Young-type interference effect originated from the coherent superposition of the (e, 2e) amplitudes from the atoms in the molecule. This type of molecular scale interference was first proposed by Cohen and Fano18 in photoionization and was successively demonstrated in the ionization of molecules induced by heavy ions19,20,21,22,23,24,25, photons26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35, as well as electrons36,37,38.

In the EMS experiments, the interference effect was first discussed in the 1980 s17 and clearly observed only recently in the experiments of CF437, H238,39, and SF640,41. Direct observation of the interference pattern in electron momentum distribution is usually very difficult due to the weak modulation on the rapidly decreasing intensity at large momentum. The feasible way is to compare the experimental cross section of a molecule with the theoretical or experimental one-center atomic cross section37,39,40 or to compare the cross sections between two different vibrational states38. Kushawaha et al.33 in their photoionization work suggested a more obvious way to observe the interferences by measuring the ratio of two cross sections corresponding to the MOs with symmetrical and anti-symmetrical characters, which are expected to give oscillations in antiphase, thus magnifying the interference pattern.

In the present work, the similar scheme has effectively been applied in EMS experiments to uncover the multi-center interferences in CF4 and CO2. The scheme is pictorially illustrated in Fig. 1a. With CF4 as an example, the three outermost MOs (1t1, 4t2, 1e) of this molecule are essentially due to lone-pair electrons or 2p atomic orbitals (AOs) on the F atoms. Figure 1b shows the calculated electron momentum profiles (see Supplementary Information Note 2) for 4t2 and 1e orbitals at equilibrium geometry. In the logarithmic coordinate both of the momentum profiles show weak oscillations extending to large momentum region due to the multi-center interferences from the ionization of the four F atoms. Different orientations of the constituent 2p AOs in 4t2 and 1e orbitals lead to the oscillations almost completely in antiphase (Fig. 1b)37. The interference pattern can be significantly magnified by plotting the ratio of the momentum profiles for these two MOs, as illustrated in Fig. 1a and Fig. 1c. A very sensitive dependence of the oscillation interference pattern on the interatomic F-F distance is expected, as shown in Fig. 1c by the clear shift in fringe maximum by about 0.15 a.u. for small changes of 0.1 Å in RFF. Therefore, this dependence may provide a means of accurate determination of molecular geometries with sub-Ångström precision.

Figure 1
figure1

Multi-center interference in electron impact ionization of molecule.

The CF4 molecule is adopted as an example. (a) Schematic representation of the multi-center interference and magnification of the interference pattern. (b) Logarithmically scaled electron momentum distributions for 1e and 4t2 MOs of CF4. (c) Ratios of momentum profiles at differential interatomic distances of CF4.

In this study, the accurate measurements are carried out for CF4 and CO2 by using a high-sensitivity angle and energy dispersive multichannel electron momentum spectrometer with simultaneous detection in 2π angle range42. Two-dimensional (2D) electron density map of binding energy and relative azimuthal angle for the outer-valence MOs for these two molecules have been obtained. The experimental electron momentum profiles for the relevant MOs are extracted. A strong dependence of the oscillation period on the interatomic distance is observed in the ratios of electron momentum profiles between two MOs with oscillations in antiphase, which is used to determine F-F distance in CF4 and O-O distance in CO2 with sub-Ångström precision. Thus, in our new approach, we can simultaneously obtain the electron density distributions of MOs and the molecular geometry information in one set of measurements. Benefited from the wide momentum range (from 0 to 8 a.u.) of this new version EMS spectrometer42, more than two periods of oscillations are included in the interference fringes. Besides, the present observation of interference effect totally depends on the experimental measurements and does not rely on the comparison with the one-center atomic cross section. These features make our approach a robust tool for imaging molecules with high precision and has the potential to apply to ultrafast imaging of molecular dynamics if combined with the ultrashort electron pulses43 in the future.

Results

2D electron density maps

Figure 2a and b show the 2D electron density maps for CF4 and CO2 measured at impact energy of 1.2 keV plus binding energy (see Methods). These 2D maps are the (e, 2e) TDCSs as functions of binding energy and relative azimuthal angle ϕ (i.e. the momentum of the orbital electron) and contain all the information on binding energy spectra (BES), electron momentum distributions, and symmetries for various ionization states. Figure 2c and d show the total BES summed over all the measured ϕ for CF4 and CO2 respectively. Gaussian functions as shown by the solid curves, which correspond to the ionizations from different MOs, are invoked to fit the BES. The MO specific electron momentum profiles can be extracted by deconvoluting the corresponding ionization peaks of the BES at different ϕ and plotting the area under the fitted peaks as a function of the magnitude of momentum p (see Supplementary Information Note 2).

Figure 2
figure2

Two-dimensional electron density maps and total binding energy spectra.

The two-dimensional electron density maps as functions of binding energy and relative azimuthal angle for (a) CF4 and for (b) CO2. The total binding energy spectra summed over all the measured azimuthal angle for (c) CF4 and for (d) CO2.

Multicenter interference effect

The orbital images for 1t1, 4t2, 1e MOs of CF4 and for 3σu, 4σg MOs of CO2 are shown at the top right of Fig. 3. For CF4 molecule, the three outer most MOs, 1t1, 4t2 and 1e, are composed of 2p lone-pair electrons on the F atoms. As we have mentioned, both the momentum profiles for 4t2 and 1e orbitals show weak oscillations due to the multi-center interferences from the ionization of the four F atoms. The phase of the interference factor depends on the different orientations of the constituent 2p AOs in the MOs37. In 4t2 orbital the 2p AOs of the four F atoms orient parallel to each other, while in 1e orbital the 2p AOs of each two pairs of F atoms are in opposite orientations. The different orientations lead to the interference oscillations of momentum profiles almost completely in antiphase (Fig. 1b). Besides 4t2, 1e orbital pair, the momentum profiles of 1t1, 4t2 orbital pair of CF4 and 3σu, 4σg orbital pair of CO2 are also modulated by the interference factors in antiphase (see Supplementary Information Note 3 and Fig. S1 for detail).

Figure 3
figure3

Experimental momentum profile ratios (solid circles) in comparison with theoretical ones (solid and dashed lines) at different interatomic distances.

(a) The ratio of MOs 1t1 to 4t2 and (b) the ratio of MOs 1e to 4t2 of CF4. (c) The ratio of MOs 4σg to 3σu of CO2. The solid blue lines show the theoretical momentum profile ratios of the molecules at equilibrium geometries (RFF = 2.1551 Å44 for CF4 and ROO = 2.3267 Å44 for CO2). The solid red and green lines represent the theoretical results at RFF = 2.1551 Å + 0.1 Å, RFF = 2.1551 Å + 0.2 Å for CF4 and ROO = 2.3267 Å + 0.1 Å, ROO = 2.3267 Å + 0.2 Å for CO2. The dashed red and green lines show the theoretical results at RFF = 2.1551 Å − 0.1 Å, RFF = 2.1551 Å − 0.2 Å for CF4 and ROO = 2.3267 Å − 0.1 Å, ROO = 2.3267 Å − 0.2 Å for CO2. The inset locates at the right top of the figure show the orbital images of the involved MOs of CF4 and CO2.

The interference pattern will significantly be magnified by plotting the ratio of the momentum profiles as indicated in Fig. 1c. Figure 3a and b show the ratios of the measured momentum profiles σ(1t1)/σ(4t2) and σ(1e)/σ(4t2) for CF4 by solid circles. Both ratios exhibit significant oscillations around constant values with more than two periods, which is the distinct evidence of the multi-center interference effect. The constant is the product of the ratio of the electron occupation numbers of MOs (6 for 1t1, 4t2 and 4 for 1e) and the ratio of the pole strengths of the corresponding ionization peaks. The pole strengths of the main ionizations peaks for the outer valence orbitals of molecules are usually approximately equal to unity. Therefore, the constant is roughly dependent on the ratio of the electron occupation numbers, which is about 1 for σ(1t1)/σ(4t2) and 0.67 for σ(1e)/σ(4t2) as is the case shown in Fig. 3a and b. We also illustrate in the figures the theoretical ratios for σ(1t1)/σ(4t2) and σ(1e)/σ(4t2) of CF4 calculated at the equilibrium interatomic F-F distance RFF = 2.1551 Å44 as well as at the distances changing −0.2 Å, −0.1 Å,+0.1 Å,+0.2 Å. The theoretical momentum profiles are calculated by B3LYP density functional method adopting aug-cc-pVTZ basis sets (see Supplementary Information Note 2). A very sensitive dependence of the oscillation interference pattern on the interatomic F-F distance can be observed. The theoretical results at equilibrium geometry give the best agreement with the experiments.

For CO2 molecule, 3σu and 4σg MOs, which are hybrid orbitals of the oxygen (O) lone-pairs, are anti-symmetrical (u) and symmetrical (g) that are expected to give oscillations in antiphase. The experimental and theoretical momentum profile ratios of 3σu and 4σg MOs are shown in Fig. 3c. As is expected, the experimental ratio presents regular oscillation around a constant of about 0.85 that corresponds to the pole strength ratio of 4σg and 3σu (0.72/0.85)45. Similar to the situation of CF4, a very sensitive dependence of the interference pattern on the interatomic O-O distance is observed and the theoretical result at equilibrium geometry (ROO = 2.3267 Å44) give approximately the best agreement with the experiment.

It should also be noted that the experimental data obviously deviate from the theoretical predictions at large momentum. These derivations should be ascribed to the distorted wave effect which is a common phenomena in EMS14 at large momentum region and such effect may be different for different MOs. However, it still remains an unresolved problem to include the distorted wave effect in the calculations for the molecular system.

Determining interatomic distance

As is discussed above, the oscillation period of the interference pattern is very sensitive to the change of interatomic distance, which provides a possible way to determine the interatomic distances with high precision. This is the well-known benefit in precision of any interferometric measurements like the Young’s double-slit experiment. In order to determine the exact values of the equilibrium interatomic distances from the present experimental data, a series of theoretical momentum profile ratios are calculated at various interatomic distances R and a least-square fitting procedure is performed (see Supplementary Information 4). The χ2 values, which is defined as the sum of the squared differences between experimental and theoretical momentum profile ratios, are shown as open circles in Fig. 4 as functions of relative interatomic distances (R − Req)/Req, where Req are the equilibrium interatomic distances of CF4 and CO2 reported in ref. 44. Three-order polynomials (solid line) are used to fit the χ2 distributions. As can be seen in Fig. 4a–c, the minimum points of χ2 values are (R − Req)/Req = 0.033, 0.018 and −0.059 for the momentum profile ratios of 1t1/4t2, 1e/2t2 of CF4 and 4σg/3σu of CO2. Therefore the exact values of the equilibrium interatomic distances of the present work can thus be determined to be RFF = 2.23 Å or 2.19 Å (2.21 Å on average) for CF4 and ROO = 2.19 Å for CO2. On the other hand, the uncertainty of χ2 value, shown as error bar in Fig. 4, can be deduced from that of the experimental data, which includes the statistical and deconvolution uncertainties. The corresponding error bars show that the minimum points of χ2 distributions can just be resolved from the points of (R − Req)/Req = 0.00, 0.07 for 1t1/4t2 of CF4, (R − Req)/Req = −0.01, 0.05 for 1e/4t2 of CF4 and (R − Req)/Req = −0.09, −0.03 for 4σg/3σu of CO2, as indicated by the dashed lines in Fig. 4a–c. The uncertainties of the determined values of equilibrium interatomic distances are thereby ±0.08 Å or ±0.06 Å (±0.07 Å on average) for CF4 and ±0.07 Å for CO2, which are about 3–4% of interatomic distances. By further improving the momentum resolution and reducing the statistical uncertainty, it would not be difficult to reach 1% or better in geometry determination.

Figure 4
figure4

The χ2 value distributions for CF4 and CO2 as a function of interatomic distances.

(a) for 1t1/4t2 of CF4, (b) for 1e/4t2 of CF4 and (c) for 4σg/3σu of CO2.

Discussion

We demonstrate a robust method for the retrieval of the interatomic distances from the multicenter interference effect of molecules with EMS. A sensitive dependence of the oscillation period on the interatomic distance is observed in the ratios of electron momentum profiles between two MOs with oscillations in antiphase. A least-square fitting procedure is used to precisely determine the equilibrium F-F distance in CF4 and O-O distance in CO2 with sub-Ångström precision. The result for F-F distance is RFF = 2.21 Å ±0.07 Å, which is consistent with the value reported by electron diffraction44 within the experimental uncertainty. As for O-O distance in CO2, the result is determined to be ROO = 2.19 Å ±0.07 Å. It is slightly smaller than the value from the electron diffraction experiments44. EMS is readily a well-established technique to obtain the spherically averaged electron momentum distributions for individual MOs. Therefore, by unveiling its new ability of determination of molecular bond lengths, EMS is now able to obtain the electron density distributions of MOs and the molecular geometry information simultaneously in one set of measurements. On the other hand, the recent advances in ultrashort electron pulses allowing one to achieve 4D electron diffraction3,4,5,6 as well as 4D electron microscopy46,47. The most recent work48,49 also demonstrated the feasibility of time-resolved EMS measurements of short-lived transient species, where an ultrashort photon pulse is used for exciting the dynamics of interest and an ultrashort electron pulse is applied to probe the system as a function of the delay time between them. Therefore, by employing the new approach of the present work as well as ultrashort electron pulses, EMS has the potential to apply to ultrafast imaging of the molecular dynamics by exploring not only the change of electron densities but also the change of molecular structures for transient species.

Methods

Experiment

The experiment is carried out using a high-sensitivity angle and energy dispersive multichannel electron momentum spectrometer with nearly 2π azimuthal angle range (2π-EMS). The details of the 2π-EMS can be seen in ref. 42. Briefly, the experiment involves coincidence detection of two outgoing electrons produced by electron impact ionization of the target molecule. The electron beam generated from a thermal cathode electron gun is accelerated to the energy of 1200 eV plus the binding energy to collide with the gas-phase target in the gas cell. The symmetric non-coplanar kinematics is employed. The scattered and ejected electrons with equal polar angles (θ1 = θ2 = 45°) and energies are analyzed by a spherical electrostatic analyzer with 90° sector and 2π azimuthal angle range. The two outgoing electrons are detected in coincidence by a position sensitive detector placed at the exit plane of the analyzer. The passing energies of energy analyzer are 600 eV for CF4 and 200 eV for CO2, respectively. The performances of EMS-2π are calibrated by electron impact ionization of Argon before experiment. The energy resolution, polar angle resolution and azimuthal angle resolution are determined to be ΔE = 2.2 eV, Δθ = 1.0° and Δϕ = 2.4° for CF4 experiment and ΔE = 1.4 eV, Δθ = 1.0° and Δϕ = 2.9° for CO2 experiment, respectively.

Interference effect in EMS

Based on the LCAO approximation, the momentum space wavefunction of the ith MO can be expressed as,

where ϕiJ(p) is the momentum space representation of the atomic basis function on Jth atom and RJ is the coordinate vector. N is the number of atoms. The triple differential cross section (TDCS) of EMS is proportional to the spherically averaged electron momentum distribution (see Supplementary Information Note 2, Note3 for details) that can be separated into two parts17,

Similar to the cross section in the electron diffraction50 (including the laser induced electron diffraction10,11), the first term of the right side of eq. (2) is the electron density distributions contributed from the atoms, which is the incoherent sum of electron densities on individual atoms and carries no molecular structure information. While the second term of the right side of eq. (2) contains the interference factor, the oscillation periodic of which depends on the interatomic distance between atom Jb and Ja and the phase of which depends on the overlap of the wavefunction between different atoms. The second term can be expanded by spherical Bessel functions and the momentum profile ratio of two MOs with antiphase character can be approximately expressed as (see Supplementary Information Note 3),

where jα is the α order spherical Bessel function. The ratio eliminates the influence of the rapidly decreasing atomic momentum distribution, making it possible to direct observe of the interference pattern. Meanwhile, the ratio also significantly magnifies the magnitude of the interference oscillations.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Wang, E. et al. Imaging molecular geometry with electron momentum spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 6, 39351; doi: 10.1038/srep39351 (2016).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Neutze, R., Wouts, R., van der Spoel, D., Weckert, E. & Hajdu, J. Potential for biomolecular imaging with femtosecond X-ray pulses. Nature 406, 752–757 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chapman, H. N. et al. Femtosecond diffractive imaging with a soft-X-ray free-electron laser. Nat. Phys. 2, 839–843 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ihee, H. Direct imaging of transient omlecular structures with ultrafast diffraction. Science 291, 458–462 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Williamson, J. C., Cao, J., Ihee, H., Frey, H. & Zewail, A. H. Clocking transient chemical changes by ultrafast electron diffraction. Nature 386, 159–162 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zewail, A. H. 4D ultrafast electron diffraction, crystallography, and microscopy. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 57, 65–103 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang, J., Beck, J., Uiterwaal, C. J. & Centurion, M. Imaging of alignment and structural changes of carbon disulfide molecules using ultrafast electron diffraction. Nat. Commun. 6, 8172 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zuo, T., Bandrauk, A. & Corkum, P. Laser-induced electron diffraction: a new tool for probing ultrafast molecular dynamics. Chem. Phys. Lett. 259, 313–320 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Blaga, C. I. et al. Imaging ultrafast molecular dynamics with laser-induced electron diffraction. Nature 483, 194–197 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Meckel, M. et al. Laser-Induced electron tunneling and diffraction. Science 320, 1478–1482 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu, J. et al. Diffraction using laser-driven broadband electron wave packets. Nat. Commun. 5, 4635 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pullen, M. G. et al. Imaging an aligned polyatomic molecule with laser-induced electron diffraction. Nat. Commun. 6, 7262 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Itatani, J. et al. Tomographic imaging of molecular orbitals. Nature 432, 867–871 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brion, C. E. Looking at orbitals in the laboratory: The experimental investigation of molecular wavefunctions and binding energies by electron momentum spectroscopy. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 29, 1397–1428 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McCarthy, I. E. & Weigold, E. Electron momentum spectroscopy of atoms and molecules. Rep. Prog. Phys. 54, 789–879 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Coplan, M. A., Moore, J. H. & Doering, J. P. (e, 2e)spectroscopy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 985–1014 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng, Y., Neville, J. J. & Brion, C. E. Imaging the electron density in the highest occupied molecular orbital of glycine. Science 270, 786–788 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cook, J. P. & Brion, C. Binary (e, 2e) spectroscopy and momentum-space chemistry of CO2 . Chem. Phys. 69, 339–356 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen, H. D. & Fano, U. Interference in the Photo-Ionization of Molecules. Phys. Rev. 150, 30–33 (1966).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stolterfoht, N. et al. Evidence for Interference Effects in Electron Emission from H2 colliding with 60 MeV/u Kr34+ ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 023201 (2001).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Misra, D. et al. Interference Effect in Electron Emission in Heavy Ion Collisions with H2 Detected by Comparison with the Measured Electron Spectrum from Atomic Hydrogen. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 153201 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidt, H. T. et al. Evidence of wave-particleduality for single fast Hydrogen atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 083201 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmidt, L. P. H. et al. Young-type interference in collisions between hydrogen molecular ions and Helium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 173202 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Misra, D. et al. Two-center double-capture interference in fast He2+ + H2 collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 153201 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Voitkiv, A. B., Najjari, B., Fischer, D., Artemyev, A. N. & Surzhykov, A. Young-type interference in projectile-electron loss in energetic ion-molecule collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 233202 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, S. F. et al. Two-center interferences in dielectronic transitions in + He collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 023201 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rolles, D. et al. Isotope-induced partial localization of core electrons in the homonuclear molecule N2 . Nature 437, 711–715 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, X.-J. et al. Young’s double-slit experiment using core-level photoemission from N2: revisiting Cohen-Fano’s two-centre interference phenomenon. J. Phys. B 39, 4801–4817 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Akoury, D. et al. The simplest double slit: interference and entanglement in double photoionization of H2 . Science 318, 949–952 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fernández, J., Fojón, O., Palacios, A. & Martín, F. Interferences from fast electron emission in molecular photoionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 043005 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kreidi, K. et al. Interference in the collective electron momentum in double photoionization of H2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 133005 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zimmermann, B. et al. Localization and loss of coherence in molecular double-slit experiments. Nat. Phys. 4, 649–655 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Canton, S. E. et al. Direct observation of Young’s double-slit interferences in vibrationally resolved photoionization of diatomic molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 7302–7306 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kushawaha, R. K. et al. From double-slit interference to structural information in simple hydrocarbons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15201–15206 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ilchen, M. et al. Angular momentum sensitive two-center interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 023001 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu, X.-j. et al. Einstein–Bohr recoiling double-slit gedanken experiment performed at the molecular level. Nat Photonics 9, 120–125 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Milne-Brownlie, D. S., Foster, M., Gao, J., Lohmann, B. & Madison, D. H. Young-type interference in (e,2e) ionization of H2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 233201 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Watanabe, N., Chen, X. J. & Takahashi, M. Interference effects on (e, 2e) electron momentum profiles of CF4 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 173201 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang, Z., Shan, X., Wang, T., Wang, E. & Chen, X. Observation of the interference effect in vibrationally resolved electron momentum spectroscopy of H2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 023204 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yamazaki, M., Satoh, H., Watanabe, N., Jones, D. B. & Takahashi, M. Oscillation of the electron-density distribution in momentum space: an (e, 2e) study of H2 at large momentum transfer. Phys. Rev. A 90, 052711 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhao, M.-f. et al. Observation of interference effects in (e, 2e) electron momentum spectroscopy of SF6 . Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 28, 539–544 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Watanabe, N., Yamazaki, M. & Takahashi, M. Relationship between interference pattern and molecular orbital shape in (e, 2e) electron momentum profiles of SF6 . J. Electron Spectros. Relat. Phenom. 209, 78–86 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tian, Q., Wang, K., Shan, X. & Chen, X. A high-sensitivity angle and energy dipersive multichannel electron momentum spectrometer with 2π angle range. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 033110 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Baum, P. & Zewail, A. H. Attosecond electron pulses for 4D diffraction and microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18409–18414 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Fink, M., Schmiedekamp, C. W. & Gregory, D. Precise determination of differential electron scattering cross sections. II. CH4, CO2, CF4 . J. Chem. Phys. 71, 5238 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Tian, Q., Yang, J., Shi, Y., Shan, X. & Chen, X. Outer- and inner-valence satellites of carbon dioxide: Electron momentum spectroscopy compared with symmetry-adapted-cluster configuration interaction general-R calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 136, 094306 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Carbone, F., Kwon, O.-H. & Zewail, A. H. Dynamics of chemical bonding mapped by energy-resolved 4D electron microscopy. Science 325, 181–184 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Barwick, B., Flannigan, D. J. & Zewail, A. H. Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy. Nature 462, 902–906 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yamazaki, M., Oishi, K., Nakazawa, H., Zhu, C. & Takahashi, M. Molecular orbital imaging of the acetone S2 excited state using time-resolved (e, 2e) electron momentum spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 103005 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Chemistry: Imaging of excited electron orbitals. Nature 519, 392–392 (2015).

  50. István, H. & Hargittai, M. Stereochemical Applications of Gas-phase Electron Diffraction (VCH Publishers, 1988).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos 11534011, 11327404, 11404317, U1432118).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.W. and X.S. contributed equally to this work. E.W., X.S. and X.C. proposed the research. Q.T., J.Y. and X.S. acquired the experimental data. X.S., Q.T. and E.W. analyzed the experiment data. E.W., M.G., Y.T. and S.N. performed the theoretical analysis. E.W. and X.C. wrote the manuscript. X.C. presided over the project. All authors contributed to finalizing the manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, E., Shan, X., Tian, Q. et al. Imaging molecular geometry with electron momentum spectroscopy. Sci Rep 6, 39351 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39351

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing