The KIF1A homolog Unc-104 is important for spontaneous release, postsynaptic density maturation and perisynaptic scaffold organization

Zhang, Yao V.; Hannan, Shabab B.; Kern, Jeannine V.; Stanchev, Doychin T.; Koç, Baran; Jahn, Thomas R.; Rasse, Tobias M.

doi:10.1038/srep38172

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 27 March 2017

The KIF1A homolog Unc-104 is important for spontaneous release, postsynaptic density maturation and perisynaptic scaffold organization

Yao V. Zhang^1,2,3,
Shabab B. Hannan^1,2,4,
Jeannine V. Kern¹,
Doychin T. Stanchev¹,
Baran Koç²,
Thomas R. Jahn⁴ &
…
Tobias M. Rasse^1,4^nAff5

Scientific Reports volume 7, Article number: 38172 (2017) Cite this article

2057 Accesses
13 Citations
2 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

The kinesin-3 family member KIF1A has been shown to be important for experience dependent neuroplasticity. In Drosophila, amorphic mutations in the KIF1A homolog unc-104 disrupt the formation of mature boutons. Disease associated KIF1A mutations have been associated with motor and sensory dysfunctions as well as non-syndromic intellectual disability in humans. A hypomorphic mutation in the forkhead-associated domain of Unc-104, unc-104^bris, impairs active zone maturation resulting in an increased fraction of post-synaptic glutamate receptor fields that lack the active zone scaffolding protein Bruchpilot. Here, we show that the unc-104^brismutation causes defects in synaptic transmission as manifested by reduced amplitude of both evoked and miniature excitatory junctional potentials. Structural defects observed in the postsynaptic compartment of mutant NMJs include reduced glutamate receptor field size, and altered glutamate receptor composition. In addition, we observed marked loss of postsynaptic scaffolding proteins and reduced complexity of the sub-synaptic reticulum, which could be rescued by pre- but not postsynaptic expression of unc-104. Our results highlight the importance of kinesin-3 based axonal transport in synaptic transmission and provide novel insights into the role of Unc-104 in synapse maturation.

A Munc18-1 mutant mimicking phosphorylation by Down Syndrome-related kinase Dyrk1a supports normal synaptic transmission and promotes recovery after intense activity

Article Open access 21 February 2020

Defects in syntabulin-mediated synaptic cargo transport associate with autism-like synaptic dysfunction and social behavioral traits

Article 24 April 2020

A de novo missense mutation in synaptotagmin-1 associated with neurodevelopmental disorder desynchronizes neurotransmitter release

Article Open access 06 February 2024

Introduction

Kinesins are microtubule based molecular motors that transport various cargos including membranous organelles, protein complexes and messenger RNAs¹. Thus, they are of fundamental importance for the establishment, plasticity, injury response and survival of neuronal networks^2,3. C. elegans Unc-104^4,5, Drosophila Unc-104/Imac⁶ and the mammalian kinesin-3 family members KIF1A and KIF1B^7,8 are the predominant motor proteins for the fast anterograde transport of membranous organelles. KIF1A knockout mice display severe neurological abnormalities including motor and sensory disturbances and die shortly after birth⁸. In Drosophila complete loss of unc-104 function in motor neurons leads to an arrest of synaptogenesis and embryonic lethality⁶.

In humans recessive, autosomal dominant and spontaneous mutations in KIF1A have been associated with hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP)^{9,10,11,12,13}, and hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type IIC (HSAN2C)¹⁴. Moreover, mutations in KIF1B has been implicated in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease¹⁵. These diseases primarily affect nerve cells that have long axons and are thus most dependent on efficient cargo transport, consistent with kinesin-3’s important role for long-range intracellular trafficking. Apart from these symptoms in the peripheral nervous system, HSAN2C related mutations in KIF1A were also described to affect the central nervous system causing mental retardation and brain atrophy^9,16,17. While unc-104’s mammalian homolog KIF1A is important in facilitating synaptogenesis in an experience dependent manner¹⁸, Unc-104 has been proposed to be part of the molecular machinery that regulates activity-dependent feedback in Drosophila photoreceptors¹⁹. Thus, defects in plasticity might be of major pathological relevance in the context of disease-related loss of KIF1A function.

We have previously reported a hypomorphic allele, unc-104^bris which causes partial loss of kinesin-3 function and thus permits detailed analysis of synapse maturation at the larval stage unlike the unc-104 null mutant that dies at late-embryonic stage⁶. The recessive point mutation unc-104^bris at the forkhead associated (FHA) domain causes morphological changes at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) such as increased NMJ length and synaptic bouton number as well as reduced bouton size²⁰. In addition, unc-104^brishave increased proportion of postsynaptic glutamate receptor fields that are unapposed by presynaptic active zone (AZ) scaffolding protein Bruchpilot (Brp)^20,21,22,23. Furthermore, we have recently shown that these Brp-negative synapses lack all major AZ components investigated, such as Liprin-α, Cacophony and SRPK79D, suggesting a crucial role of unc-104 in presynaptic maturation²³.

Despite the mounting evidence on the consequences of unc-104 loss-of-function on the maturation of the presynaptic terminal, little is known about its impact on postsynaptic development. In the present study, we examine functional and structural defects at unc-104^bris mutant NMJs with emphasis on structural deficits in the postsynaptic compartment. We found defects in synaptic transmission and altered glutamate receptor composition as a consequence of partial loss of kinesin-3 function. In addition, the postsynaptic compartments are characterized by the reduced abundance of discs large (Dlg), Dorsal B (DorB) and α-Spectrin (α-Spec) as well as reduced folding complexity of the subsynaptic reticulum (SSR). These defects can be rescued by the presynaptic but not postsynaptic expression of unc-104. Collectively, our data reveal new functions of kinesin-3 based transport in synapse development and may have important implications for our understanding of the molecular pathway underlying neurological diseases caused by impaired kinesin-3 function.

Results

Synaptic transmission is impaired in unc-104^bris mutants

Unc-104^bris mutant larvae demonstrate a distinct synapse maturation defect. At wild-type NMJs only the youngest synapses, in sum approximately 5%, lack the AZ organizing protein Brp²⁴. In contrast, at the NMJs of unc-104^bris mutant larvae about 25% of the postsynaptic densities (PSDs) are unapposed by Brp^20,23. In order to examine the functional consequences of impaired kinesin-3 function, we performed intracellular current clamp recordings at 3^rd instar larval NMJs. The amplitude of evoked and miniature excitatory junctional potentials (EJPs and mEJPs) was reduced by 72% and 50% respectively in unc-104^bris mutants compared to controls (Fig. 1a–d). The quantal content, which is an estimation of the number of synaptic vesicles (SVs) released per evoked release event, was decreased by 47% at unc-104^bris mutant NMJs (Fig. 1e). Furthermore, we observed a 20-fold reduction in mEJP frequency in unc-104^bris larvae. All above described functional defects were rescued by ectopic pan-neuronal expression of UAS-unc-104-mcherry (Fig. 1c,f). Expression of the rescue construct in the control background did not affect junctional potentials but resulted in a 42% increase in mEJP frequency (Fig. 1c,f).

**Figure 1: Impaired synaptic transmission in *unc-104*^bris mutant NMJs.**

Unc-104^bris mutants display altered glutamate receptor composition

Multiple presynaptic structural defects have so far been identified in the context of loss of unc-104 function^6,20,23. However, the importance of Unc-104 for postsynaptic development is largely unexplored. We next investigated whether impaired synaptic transmission at unc-104^bris mutant NMJs might be caused by altered postsynaptic glutamate receptor composition and/or clustering. To this aim we first performed immunohistochemistry at the NMJ using antibodies against Brp and obligate glutamate receptor subunit IIC (GluRIIC). We observed a 17% reduction of the average GluR field size at the NMJ (Fig. 2a,b). The reduction in size is reflected by plotting all GluR fields based on their size, where unc-104^bris mutant NMJs have an increased percentage of small GluR fields (Fig. 2c). To address the role of presynaptic Brp presence on the size of GluR fields, we limited our size analysis only to those GluR fields that were positive for Brp. Intriguingly, we did not observe a difference in GluR field size in the subset of synapses that were positive for Brp (Fig. 2a,d).

**Figure 2: Impaired glutamate receptor composition at *unc-104*^bris mutant NMJs.**

Two types of ionotropic glutamate receptors have been identified at the Drosophila NMJ synapses. Apart from the three obligatory subunits, they either contain GluRIIA or GluRIIB as a fourth subunit to form a functional heterotetrameric receptor²⁵. The Drosophila NMJ contains a mixture of IIA- and IIB-type glutamate receptors. We sought to assess whether differential incorporation and stabilization of glutamate receptor complexes could be observed at unc-104^bris mutant NMJs. To visualize GluRIIB and GluRIIA, we utilized a double transgenic line expressing GluRIIB-GFP and GluRIIA-mRFP under the control of their native promotors^24,26. The intensity of GluRIIA-mRFP was reduced in unc-104^bris mutant synapses (Fig. 2e, arrowheads and f). Localization and abundance of GluRIIB-GFP remained unchanged in unc-104^bris mutants (Fig. 2e, arrowheads and g). It has been reported that receptor composition changes during synapse maturation at Drosophila NMJ: IIA-type receptors are predominant in immature synapses, whereas the IIA- and IIB-type receptor ratios are balanced as synapses mature²⁶. We quantified the IIA- and IIB-type receptors for each PSD and found that consistent with previous reports, small synapses in control group were “IIA-rich” compared with mature ones which had a more balanced glutamate receptor composition (Fig. 2h). In contrast, IIA-receptors are not enriched at small synapses of unc-104^bris mutant larvae (Fig. 2h). Irrespective of their size, synapses of unc-104^bris mutant larvae contain less IIA-type receptors than control (Fig. 2i), while no changes were observed in the amount of GluRIIB per synapse between control and unc-104^bris mutants (Fig. 2j). IIA- and IIB-type glutamate receptors exhibit distinct electrophysiological properties^25,27,28,29, with the IIA-type receptors showing higher single channel conductance than IIB-type receptors²⁸. Therefore, the altered receptor composition may contribute to the decreased EJP and mEJPs sizes in unc-104^bris mutants.

Impaired abundance of post synaptic markers in unc-104^bris mutants

Membrane associated guanylate kinase-like proteins (MAGUKs) including PSD protein 93 and 95 (PSD-93, PSD-95), SAP97 and SAP102 are thought to be key organizers of molecular scaffolds at excitatory synapses³⁰. We examined the localization of Dlg³¹, the Drosophila homolog of PSD-95, at unc-104^bris mutant synapses to further investigate the impact of reduced Unc-104 function on postsynaptic development. We found that Dlg was severely reduced at unc-104^bris mutant NMJs (Fig. 3a). Next, we examined two additional postsynaptic markers, the Drosophila NF-κB protein DorB^31,32 and the SSR enriched, cytoskeletal protein α-Spec³³. Similar to Dlg, the levels of both DorB and α-Spec were also reduced at the SSR (Fig. 3b,c).

**Figure 3: Reduced intensity of postsynaptic markers in *unc-104*^bris mutants.**

Reduced levels of synaptic markers observed in unc-104^bris could be a result of loss of Unc-104 in the presynaptic or postsynaptic compartment or both. Thus, we ectopically expressed UAS-unc-104-mcherry in the unc-104^bris background either pan-neuronally using elav-Gal4 or in muscles using 24B-Gal4. Presynaptic but not postsynaptic expression of Unc-104 was able to restore normal Dlg abundance in mutant NMJs (Fig. 3b). Our results suggest that impaired pre-, and not postsynaptic, Unc-104 function is upstream of the partial loss of postsynaptic markers in unc-104^bris mutants.

Unc-104^bris mutants display gross morphological changes in SSR membranes

Type I boutons are surrounded by the SSR, which consists of densely stacked muscle membranes that are thought to be important for the stability of the neuromuscular terminal^31,34. Loosening and vacuolization of the SSR has been described in NMJ dismantling during metamorphosis³⁵. Given that partial loss of Dlg has been associated with reduced convolution of SSR membranes^31,36, we investigated the ultrastructure of the extrasynaptic compartment of larval NMJs using electron microscopy. While wild-type boutons were surrounded by a tight array of muscle membranes, the SSR structure was less dense in unc-104^bris mutant NMJs suggesting that partial loss of Unc-104 function results in gross morphological changes in postsynaptic compartments (Fig. 4a). The ultrastructure of the SSR could be rescued by pre- but not by postsynaptic expression of unc-104 cDNA, suggesting that SSR defects are secondary to loss of presynaptic Unc-104 function (Fig. 4a). Taken together, our results show that partial loss of Unc-104 function resulted in reduced levels of postsynaptic proteins and impaired SSR morphology.

**Figure 4: Subsynaptic reticulum development defects in *unc-104*^bris mutants.**

Discussion

Unc-104^bris mutant NMJs are characterized by a strong reduction in EJP amplitude (Fig. 1a,b). This is consistent with previous reports that unc-104^bris mutant larvae are severely impaired in locomotion; larval lethality is preceded by almost complete paralysis at L3 stage²⁰. Notably, the strong reduction in EJP amplitude (Fig. 1a,b) and the number of vesicles released (Fig. 1d) per action potential are not being partially compensated in the postsynaptic compartment by concomitant increase in the mEJP amplitude (Fig. 1c), i.e. the response per vesicle. This is surprising as it has been previously reported that upon decrease in quantal content due to lack of Brp, mEJP amplitudes are scaled up³⁷. Loss of Brp from a subset of synapses is a primary defect in unc-104^bris larvae²⁰.

We observed a strong reduction of mEJP frequency at unc-104^bris mutant NMJs (Fig. 1c,f). Kinesin-3 is the major transporter of SVs, and previous reports show several SV markers are severely reduced at unc-104 mutant NMJs^6,23. Loss of SVs from the NMJ as well as alterations in the size of the readily releasable pool are possible causes for the decreased mEJP frequency at unc-104^bris mutant NMJs. While there is direct ultrastructural evidence for the loss of SVs from boutons in unc-104 null mutant embryos⁶, we did not observe any reduction in the amount of SVs at central synapses in unc-104^bris mutant larvae²³. Interestingly, while presynaptic over-expression of the UAS-unc-104-mcherry transgene in wild-type background did not cause any changes in EJP or mEJP amplitudes, it resulted in an increase in mEJP frequency (Fig. 1c,f). These data suggest that the frequency of spontaneous release is likely particularly sensitive to the abundance of readily releasable pool of SVs at the NMJ which might be regulated by kinesin-3 based axonal transport.

In the nervous system, homeostatic signaling is an essential feedback mechanism to ensure stable synaptic activity in a highly variable environment. Homeostatic signaling has been shown to compensate for perturbation of synaptic excitability through multiple mechanisms including changing the efficacy of SV release, ion channel density and neurotransmitter receptor composition^38,39,40,41. The conductivity of IIA-type glutamate receptors is much larger than IIB-type receptors, and change in the ratio between these two receptors has been shown to modulate quantal size²⁷. Thus, a change in receptor composition is a potential mediator of postsynaptic homeostasis. Synaptic transmission blockage via presynaptic expression of TNT leads for example to higher abundance of the GluRIIA at the PSD²⁶. Likewise, the ratio of GluRIIA/GluRIIB containing glutamate receptors changes in dsyd-1 mutants due to a simultaneous increase in GluRIIA and decrease in GluRIIB abundance⁴². However, no such change was observed in liprin-α mutants, that display a similar reduction in glutamate release⁴². Alternatively, this phenotype might thus be caused by a loss of a maturation signal that is present in liprin-α mutants, but lacking in dsyd-1 mutants. Despite the severely impaired presynaptic AZ assembly²³, no sign of postsynaptic compensation is observed in unc-104^bris mutants. Hence, the observed reduction in GluRIIA clustering is likely responsible for the decreased mEJP amplitude, and in turn contributes to the impaired EJP (Fig. 1a–c).

We have previously shown that the unc-104^bris mutation causes alteration of the gross NMJ structure, resulting in impaired synapse maturation along with severe reduced anterograde transport of SVs and dense core vesicles^20,23. Interestingly, expression of Rab3, an SV-associated protein that is depleted from the nerve terminals of unc-104^brismutants partially ameliorates presynaptic and postsynaptic defects²³. This suggests that some of the phenotypes observed in unc-104^bris mutants are likely due to the depletion of Unc-104 cargo at presynaptic terminal. The present study shows a severe loss of mEJP frequency in unc-104^bris NMJs (Fig. 1c,f). Given that mEJPs are an instructive signal that guides synaptic development⁴³, some of the observed morphological defects in unc-104^briscould be a result of reduced mEJP frequency (Fig. 1c,f). As presynaptic expression of Unc-104 rescues postsynaptic Dlg and SSR phenotypes (Figs 3b and 4a), it would be interestingly to address in a future study, if this rescue is dependent on specific presynaptic Unc-104 cargo.

Dlg, one of the major proteins localized to the SSR, is a known interaction partner of Gtaxin⁴⁴, the Drosophila homolog of mammalian syntaxin-18, which regulates endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane trafficking⁴⁵. It is intriguing to postulate that that Dlg and Gtaxin may cooperatively regulate addition of ER membrane to the SSR⁴⁶, and via this membrane trafficking pathway ER characteristics might be transferred to the SSR⁴⁶. Consistently, ample evidence suggests that local translation might occur at the SSR^47,48,49. This raises the exciting possibility that the reduced SSR complexity observed at unc-104^bris mutant NMJs (Fig. 4) might be a result of impaired membrane addition to the SSR. The insufficiently developed SSR at unc-104^bris mutant NMJs might be less efficient in local translation of key proteins required for synaptic development. Consistent with this notion, the glutamate receptor subunit IIA, which is strongly reduced at unc-104^bris mutant NMJs (Fig. 2f), has been shown to be translated in local, subsynaptic translation aggregates⁴⁷.

The membrane of insect muscles is invaginated at most synapses to frame a complex array of tubes and folds, the SSR. Although it is morphologically similar to subsynaptic folds that have been proposed to be important to amplify synaptic signals at the vertebrate NMJ, its primary cellular function might be different⁵⁰. At the Drosophila NMJ, the SSR gradually develops at Type I boutons. It is more pronounced at Type Ib boutons, displaying more fully developed and deeper stacked SSR than Type Is terminals^34,51. Type II and III fibers that often run parallel with Type I innervations might be partially embedded in the SSR emerging from the Type I innervation but do not form a multi-layered complex SSR on their own⁵¹. The SSR is also absent from synapses at indirect flight muscles⁵⁰, suggesting that its role is modulatory rather than essential for neurotransmission. We found that the SSR in unc-104^bris mutant larvae is less dense than in control larvae (Fig. 4). While loosening of the SSR has been associated with NMJs dismantling during metamorphosis³⁵, it is not very likely that the reduced SSR complexity at unc-104^bris mutant NMJs is due to ongoing neurodegeneration²⁰.

Similar with a previously described HSP Type 10 (SPG10) Drosophila model, larval locomotion was also severely impaired in unc-104^bris mutant larvae^20,52. However, while robust structural defects were observed upon disturbance of Kinesin-1 based transport⁵², no signs of synapse dismantling were observed in unc-104^bris mutant larvae²⁰. Therefore it is more likely that the observed reduction of SSR associated proteins (Fig. 3a–c) and the reduction of SSR density (Fig. 4) at unc-104^bris mutant NMJs reflects a defect in synapse maturation and/or plasticity rather than being a sign of neurodegeneration.

The degree of behavioral impairment and the lethality of unc-104^bris larvae is similar to those described for a Drosophila model for SPG10 caused by dominant negative mutations in kinesin heavy chain (khc), the Drosophila homolog of human KIF5A⁵². Notably, although both disease models are characterized by a partial loss of kinesin function related to two forms of HSPs, different pathological progressions were observed. SPG10 model larvae display a pronounced dystonic posterior paralysis that is reminiscent of the ascending paralysis observed in SPG10 patients⁵². While SPG30 is also an ascending motoneuron disease that firstly and primarily affects nerve cells that innervate the feet of the patients, unc-104^bris larvae suffer from a more generalized paralysis, i.e. NMJs in segments innervated by longer axons seem not to be more severely affected²⁰. This complex phenotype highlights that more detailed studies will be necessary to fully dissect the specific impact of kinesin-3 dysfunction on neural function and human pathology.

While truncation of KIF1A has been associated with another neurological disease HSAN2C¹⁴, various mutations of KIF1A have been associated with SPG30 as well as non-syndromic intellectual disability accompanied by variable additional symptoms including progressive encephalopathy and brain atrophy^{9,16,17,53,54}. Recently, an amino acid exchange (S69L), proposed to be important for the ATP binding of KIF1A, has been shown to underlie SPG30¹⁰. A detailed comparison of different disease related mutations may give valuable insight on the specific impact of disrupting the function of different domains of KIF1A.

The amino acid mutated in unc-104^bris larvae has been suggested to further stabilize kinesin-3 dimers by electrostatic interaction with the E499 residue⁵⁵. Defects observed in unc-104^bris larvae are not restricted to the axonal compartment, but include defects in dendrite maturation in sensory neurons²⁰, a phenotype most relevant in the context of HSAN2C. We thus suggest that the animal disease model presented herein, rather than being a precise model of any of the human diseases associated with KIF1A dysfunction, might have broad implication for neurological diseases that are associated with impaired stability of kinesin-3 dimer including of HSP, HSAN2C and intellectual disability.

Methods

Fly Stocks

Flies were cultured on standard soft media seeded with live yeast at 25 °C unless otherwise indicated. w¹¹¹⁸, elav-Gal4, 24B-Gal4 and unc-104^d11024 were obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center. GluRIIA-mRFP²⁴ and GluRIIB-GFP²⁶ with endogenous promoters were obtained from Stephan Sigrist (FU Berlin). UAS-unc-104-mcherry was a generous gift from Thomas Schwarz (Harvard University).

Immunohistochemistry and microscopy

Middle 3^rd instar stage larvae were dissected in Ca²⁺-free HL3 solution and fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS for 3 minutes (for staining with native fluorescent proteins) or for 10 minutes (for staining with only immunofluorescent labeling). Correct NMJs were identified as previously described⁵⁶. Primary antibody incubation was done overnight at 4 °C in PBS containing 0.05% Triton-X and 5% normal goat serum. Fillets were then washed and incubated with fluorescent-conjugated secondary antibodies at room temperature for 2 hours. Larval fillets were mounted on a glass slide in mounting medium (Vectashield, Vector). Primary antibodies used were: mouse monoclonal anti-Dlg at 1:100, mouse monoclonal anti-Brp (NC82) at 1:100, mouse anti-α-Spec (3A9) at 1:100 (Developmental Studies Hybidoma Bank), rabbit anti-GluRIIC at 1:2000 (Stephan Sigrist), rabbit anti-DorB at 1:4000 (Steven Wasserman). Fluorescent-conjugated secondary antibodies used were: goat anti-mouse Alexa 488 or Alexa 568 and goat anti-rabbit Alexa 488 or Alexa 568 (Molecular Probes) or goat anti-mouse Atto 647 (Sigma). Goat anti-HRP conjugated with Cy3 (Dianova) was added together with secondary antibodies. All fluorescent-conjugated antibodies were diluted at 1:500. Images were captured and processed essentially as previously described^20,23,57,58. In detail, a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope with a 40x plan apochromat 1.3 N.A. oil objective and the ZEN software was used to acquire images at voxel size: 100 nm * 100 nm * 500 nm; pinhole: 1 AU, average: 2–4. ImageJ 1.43 (NIH) was used for image processing and analysis.

Electron Microscopy

Sample preparation and image acquisition were performed essentially as previously described⁵². In brief, fillets were fixed with 4% PFA (in PBS) for 10 min at room temperature followed by fixation in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (in PBS) overnight at 4 °C. Next, samples were treated with 1% osmium tetroxide in 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, for 1 h on ice. Larval fillets were rinsed with water, treated with 1% aqueous uranyl acetate (UA) for 1 h at 4 °C, dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol concentrations, and stored in liquid Epon overnight. Next, muscles 4 of segment 4 were dissected with sharp insect pins, embedded in Epon, and polymerized for 48 h at 60 °C. Ultrathin sections were stained with UA and lead citrate and viewed in a Philips CM10 electron microscope.

Electrophysiology

Current clamp intracellular recordings were performed on muscle 6 segment A2 of mid 3^rd instar stage larvae as previously described⁵². The larvae were pinned and stretched in a Sylgard-coated perfusion chamber and visualized on an Olympus BX51WI microscope. “Bee-stinger” sharp electrodes (10–15 MΩ), made of borosilicate glass (outer diameter 1.5 μm) were filled with 3 M KCl. Only cells with resting potentials between −55 and −80 mV and input resistance higher than 4 MΩ were included in the analysis. Recordings were performed in HL3 Stewart saline⁵⁹ containing (in mM): 70 NaCl, 5 KCl, 20 MgCl₂, 10 NaHCO₃, 5 trehalose, 115 sucrose, and 5 HEPES; the concentration of Ca²⁺ was 1, pH adjusted to 7.2. All experiments were performed at 18 °C. Stimulation of the segmental nerve was executed by pulling the cut end of the nerve into a self-made suction electrode (5–6 μm in diameter) filled with HL3 and passing a brief (0.3 ms) bi-polarizing pulse across the nerve. Stimulation was accomplished with an ISO-STIM 01D stimulus isolation unit (NPI electronics GmbH, Tamm, Germany). The signal was acquired with an Axoclamp 900A amplifier (Axon Instruments), digitized with a Digidata 1440A analog to digital board, and recorded with a PC using pClamp 10. 3 (Axon Instruments), and analyzed with AxoGraph X software. The amplitudes of the EJPs were corrected for nonlinear summation. The quantal content was estimated by dividing the averaged corrected EJP by the averaged mEJP amplitude⁶⁰.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the software PRISM 6. Sample errors are given as standard error of the mean (SEM). The following alpha levels were used for all tests: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Data were first tested for normality and then analyzed by either the student’s t-test for two groups or by a one-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Non-normally distributed data were analyzed by using either a Mann-Whitney test for two groups or a Kruskal-Wallis test for multiple groups.

Use of experimental animals and human subjects

This study did not involve the use of human subjects or samples from human donors. All experiments were performed in accordance with University guidelines and regulations.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Zhang, Y. V. et al. The KIF1A homolog Unc-104 is important for spontaneous release, postsynaptic density maturation and perisynaptic scaffold organization. Sci. Rep. 7, 38172; doi: 10.1038/srep38172 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

Hirokawa, N., Noda, Y., Tanaka, Y. & Niwa, S. Kinesin superfamily motor proteins and intracellular transport. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10, 682–96 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hirokawa, N. & Tanaka, Y. Kinesin superfamily proteins (KIFs): Various functions and their relevance for important phenomena in life and diseases. Exp Cell Res 334, 16–25 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hirokawa, N., Nitta, R. & Okada, Y. The mechanisms of kinesin motor motility: lessons from the monomeric motor KIF1A. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10, 877–84 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hall, D. H. & Hedgecock, E. M. Kinesin-related gene unc-104 is required for axonal transport of synaptic vesicles in C. elegans. Cell 65, 837–47 (1991).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Otsuka, A. J. et al. The C. elegans unc-104 gene encodes a putative kinesin heavy chain-like protein. Neuron 6, 113–22 (1991).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pack-Chung, E., Kurshan, P. T., Dickman, D. K. & Schwarz, T. L. A Drosophila kinesin required for synaptic bouton formation and synaptic vesicle transport. Nat Neurosci 10, 980–9 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Okada, Y., Yamazaki, H., Sekine-Aizawa, Y. & Hirokawa, N. The neuron-specific kinesin superfamily protein KIF1A is a unique monomeric motor for anterograde axonal transport of synaptic vesicle precursors. Cell 81, 769–80 (1995).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yonekawa, Y. et al. Defect in synaptic vesicle precursor transport and neuronal cell death in KIF1A motor protein-deficient mice. J Cell Biol 141, 431–41 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee, J. R. et al. De novo mutations in the motor domain of KIF1A cause cognitive impairment, spastic paraparesis, axonal neuropathy, and cerebellar atrophy. Hum Mutat 36, 69–78 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ylikallio, E. et al. Dominant transmission of de novo KIF1A motor domain variant underlying pure spastic paraplegia. Eur J Hum Genet 23, 1427–30 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Klebe, S. et al. KIF1A missense mutations in SPG30, an autosomal recessive spastic paraplegia: distinct phenotypes according to the nature of the mutations. Eur J Hum Genet 20, 645–9 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hotchkiss, L. et al. Novel De Novo Mutations in KIF1A as a Cause of Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia With Progressive Central Nervous System Involvement. J Child Neurol (2016).
Citterio, A. et al. Variants in KIF1A gene in dominant and sporadic forms of hereditary spastic paraparesis. J Neurol 262, 2684–90 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Riviere, J. B. et al. KIF1A, an axonal transporter of synaptic vesicles, is mutated in hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 2. Am J Hum Genet 89, 219–30 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhao, C. et al. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2A caused by mutation in a microtubule motor KIF1Bbeta. Cell 105, 587–97 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ohba, C. et al. De novo KIF1A mutations cause intellectual deficit, cerebellar atrophy, lower limb spasticity and visual disturbance. J Hum Genet 60, 739–42 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Esmaeeli Nieh, S. et al. De novo mutations in KIF1A cause progressive encephalopathy and brain atrophy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2, 623–35 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kondo, M., Takei, Y. & Hirokawa, N. Motor protein KIF1A is essential for hippocampal synaptogenesis and learning enhancement in an enriched environment. Neuron 73, 743–57 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sugie, A. et al. Molecular Remodeling of the Presynaptic Active Zone of Drosophila Photoreceptors via Activity-Dependent Feedback. Neuron 86, 711–25 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kern, J. V., Zhang, Y. V., Kramer, S., Brenman, J. E. & Rasse, T. M. The kinesin-3, unc-104 regulates dendrite morphogenesis and synaptic development in Drosophila. Genetics 195, 59–72 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kittel, R. J. et al. Bruchpilot promotes active zone assembly, Ca2+ channel clustering, and vesicle release. Science 312, 1051–4 (2006).
Article CAS ADS PubMed Google Scholar
Wagh, D. A. et al. Bruchpilot, a protein with homology to ELKS/CAST, is required for structural integrity and function of synaptic active zones in Drosophila. Neuron 49, 833–44 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. V. et al. The Drosophila KIF1A Homolog unc-104 Is Important for Site-Specific Synapse Maturation. Front Cell Neurosci 10, 207 (2016).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rasse, T. M. et al. Glutamate receptor dynamics organizing synapse formation in vivo . Nat Neurosci 8, 898–905 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Qin, G. et al. Four different subunits are essential for expressing the synaptic glutamate receptor at neuromuscular junctions of Drosophila. J Neurosci 25, 3209–18 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schmid, A. et al. Activity-dependent site-specific changes of glutamate receptor composition in vivo . Nat Neurosci 11, 659–66 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Petersen, S. A., Fetter, R. D., Noordermeer, J. N., Goodman, C. S. & DiAntonio, A. Genetic analysis of glutamate receptors in Drosophila reveals a retrograde signal regulating presynaptic transmitter release. Neuron 19, 1237–48 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
DiAntonio, A., Petersen, S. A., Heckmann, M. & Goodman, C. S. Glutamate receptor expression regulates quantal size and quantal content at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. J Neurosci 19, 3023–32 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Marrus, S. B., Portman, S. L., Allen, M. J., Moffat, K. G. & DiAntonio, A. Differential localization of glutamate receptor subunits at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. J Neurosci 24, 1406–15 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Oliva, C., Escobedo, P., Astorga, C., Molina, C. & Sierralta, J. Role of the MAGUK protein family in synapse formation and function. Dev Neurobiol 72, 57–72 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guan, B., Hartmann, B., Kho, Y. H., Gorczyca, M. & Budnik, V. The Drosophila tumor suppressor gene, dlg, is involved in structural plasticity at a glutamatergic synapse. Curr Biol 6, 695–706 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou, B., Lindsay, S. A. & Wasserman, S. A. Alternative NF-kappaB Isoforms in the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction and Brain. PLoS One 10, e0132793 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Featherstone, D. E., Davis, W. S., Dubreuil, R. R. & Broadie, K. Drosophila alpha- and beta-spectrin mutations disrupt presynaptic neurotransmitter release. J Neurosci 21, 4215–24 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Atwood, H. L., Govind, C. K. & Wu, C. F. Differential ultrastructure of synaptic terminals on ventral longitudinal abdominal muscles in Drosophila larvae. J Neurobiol 24, 1008–24 (1993).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, Z., Chen, Y., Wang, D., Wang, S. & Zhang, Y. Q. Distinct presynaptic and postsynaptic dismantling processes of Drosophila neuromuscular junctions during metamorphosis. J Neurosci 30, 11624–34 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Budnik, V. et al. Regulation of synapse structure and function by the Drosophila tumor suppressor gene dlg. Neuron 17, 627–40 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Davis, G. W. Homeostatic signaling and the stabilization of neural function. Neuron 80, 718–28 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Murthy, V. N., Schikorski, T., Stevens, C. F. & Zhu, Y. Inactivity produces increases in neurotransmitter release and synapse size. Neuron 32, 673–82 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Thiagarajan, T. C., Lindskog, M. & Tsien, R. W. Adaptation to synaptic inactivity in hippocampal neurons. Neuron 47, 725–37 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Thiagarajan, T. C., Piedras-Renteria, E. S. & Tsien, R. W. alpha- and betaCaMKII. Inverse regulation by neuronal activity and opposing effects on synaptic strength. Neuron 36, 1103–14 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Frank, C. A., Kennedy, M. J., Goold, C. P., Marek, K. W. & Davis, G. W. Mechanisms underlying the rapid induction and sustained expression of synaptic homeostasis. Neuron 52, 663–77 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Owald, D. et al. A Syd-1 homologue regulates pre- and postsynaptic maturation in Drosophila. J Cell Biol 188, 565–79 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Choi, B. J. et al. Miniature neurotransmission regulates Drosophila synaptic structural maturation. Neuron 82, 618–34 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gorczyca, D. et al. Postsynaptic membrane addition depends on the Discs-Large-interacting t-SNARE Gtaxin. J Neurosci 27, 1033–44 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hatsuzawa, K. et al. Involvement of syntaxin 18, an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localized SNARE protein, in ER-mediated phagocytosis. Mol Biol Cell 17, 3964–77 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Thomas, U., Kobler, O. & Gundelfinger, E. D. The Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction as a model for scaffold complexes at glutamatergic synapses: benefits and limitations. J Neurogenet 24, 109–19 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sigrist, S. J. et al. Postsynaptic translation affects the efficacy and morphology of neuromuscular junctions. Nature 405, 1062–5 (2000).
Article CAS ADS PubMed Google Scholar
Menon, K. P., Andrews, S., Murthy, M., Gavis, E. R. & Zinn, K. The translational repressors Nanos and Pumilio have divergent effects on presynaptic terminal growth and postsynaptic glutamate receptor subunit composition. J Neurosci 29, 5558–72 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Menon, K. P. et al. The translational repressor Pumilio regulates presynaptic morphology and controls postsynaptic accumulation of translation factor eIF-4E. Neuron 44, 663–76 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rheuben, M. B., Yoshihara, M. & Kidokoro, Y. Ultrastructural correlates of neuromuscular junction development. Int Rev Neurobiol 43, 69–92 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jia, X. X., Gorczyca, M. & Budnik, V. Ultrastructure of neuromuscular junctions in Drosophila: comparison of wild type and mutants with increased excitability. J Neurobiol 24, 1025–44 (1993).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fuger, P. et al. Spastic paraplegia mutation N256S in the neuronal microtubule motor KIF5A disrupts axonal transport in a Drosophila HSP model. PLoS Genet 8, e1003066 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Hamdan, F. F. et al. Excess of de novo deleterious mutations in genes associated with glutamatergic systems in nonsyndromic intellectual disability. Am J Hum Genet 88, 306–16 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Okamoto, N. et al. KIF1A mutation in a patient with progressive neurodegeneration. J Hum Genet 59, 639–41 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Huo, L. et al. The CC1-FHA tandem as a central hub for controlling the dimerization and activation of kinesin-3 KIF1A. Structure 20, 1550–61 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. In vivo imaging of intact Drosophila larvae at sub-cellular resolution. J Vis Exp (2010).
Butzlaff, M. et al. Impaired retrograde transport by the Dynein/Dynactin complex contributes to Tau-induced toxicity. Hum Mol Genet 24, 3623–37 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhu, J. Y. et al. Knockdown of Hsc70-5/mortalin induces loss of synaptic mitochondria in a Drosophila Parkinson’s disease model. PLoS One 8, e83714 (2013).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Stewart, B. A., Atwood, H. L., Renger, J. J., Wang, J. & Wu, C. F. Improved stability of Drosophila larval neuromuscular preparations in haemolymph-like physiological solutions. J Comp Physiol A 175, 179–91 (1994).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
McLachlan, E. M. & Martin, A. R. Non-linear summation of end-plate potentials in the frog and mouse. J Physiol 311, 307–24 (1981).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, RA 1804/2-1) to T.M.R. We thank Schaller Foundation at the German Cancer Research Institute and University of Heidelberg and Hertie Foundation for supporting this work. We thank Raphael Zinser and Katja Dreissigacker for technical support. We thank Aaron DiAntonio, Hermann Aberle, Stephan Sigrist, Thomas Schwarz and Erich Buchner for providing reagents and fly stocks.

Author information

Tobias M. Rasse
Present address: Present address: Advanced Light Microscopy Facility, European Laboratory of Molecular Biology (EMBL), Meyerhofstraße 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.,

Authors and Affiliations

Junior Research Group Synaptic Plasticity, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 27, 72076, Tübingen, 72076, Germany
Yao V. Zhang, Shabab B. Hannan, Jeannine V. Kern, Doychin T. Stanchev & Tobias M. Rasse
Graduate School of Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, 72074, Germany
Yao V. Zhang, Shabab B. Hannan & Baran Koç
Department of Biology and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 02139, MA, USA
Yao V. Zhang
CHS Research Group Proteostasis in Neurodegenerative Disease at CellNetworks Heidelberg University and DKFZ Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
Shabab B. Hannan, Thomas R. Jahn & Tobias M. Rasse

Authors

Yao V. Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Shabab B. Hannan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jeannine V. Kern
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Doychin T. Stanchev
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Baran Koç
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Thomas R. Jahn
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tobias M. Rasse
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.M.R. conceived and supervised the project. Y.V.Z., D.T.S., J.V.K., S.B.H. and T.M.R. designed the experiments. Y.V.Z., B.K., D.T.S. and J.V.K. performed the experiments. Y.V.Z., D.T.S., J.V.K., B.K. and S.B.H. analyzed the data. Y.V.Z., S.B.H., T.R.J. and T.M.R. wrote the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias M. Rasse.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Hannan, S., Kern, J. et al. The KIF1A homolog Unc-104 is important for spontaneous release, postsynaptic density maturation and perisynaptic scaffold organization. Sci Rep 7, 38172 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38172

Download citation

Received: 16 October 2015
Accepted: 07 November 2016
Published: 27 March 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38172

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.