Article | Open | Published:

Enhanced Absorption and Diffusion Properties of Lithium on B,N,VC-decorated Graphene

Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 37911 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Systematic first-principles calculations were performed to investigate the adsorption and diffusion of Li on different graphene layers with B/N-doping and/or C-vacancy, so as to understand why doping heteroatoms in graphene anode could significantly improve the performance of lithium-ion batteries. We found that the formation of single or double carbon vacancies in graphene are critical for the adsorption of Li atoms. While the N-doping facilitates the formation of vacancies, it introduces over binding issue and hinders the Li diffusion. The presence of B takes the excessive electrons from Li and N and reduces the energy barrier of Li diffusion on substrates. We perceive that these clear insights are crucial for the further development of graphene based anode materials for lithium-ion batteries.

Introduction

With excellent characters of high energy density, long cycling life and environmental friendliness, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been widely used in portable electronic devices1,2,3,4,5. The performance of LIBs is mainly determined by the intrinsic properties of their electrodes. Therefore much attention has been paid in the recent years on exploring and developing novel electrode materials. Carbonaceous materials, such as graphite6,7, carbon nanofibers8,9, carbon nanotubes10,11,12 and porous carbon13,14, are promising anode materials in LIBs due to their high Li-storage capacity, high conductivity, decent electrochemical activity and low cost15,16. In particular, graphene has attracted extensive research interests with a theoretical maximum lithium capacity of 784 mAh/g by forming Li2C6 structure17, and an even higher capacity up to 1488 mAh/g for an isolated graphene flake that is only 0.7 nm in diameter18,19. However, it was found that the Li capacity of some graphene samples can be even significantly lower than that of bulk graphite20, possibly due to the formation of small Li clusters on graphene as the interaction between Li atoms21,22,23 is much stronger than that between Li and pristine graphene24,25,26.

Many approaches have been pursued to functionalize graphene as an anode material and doping graphene with nitrogen (N) and/or boron (B) atoms is one of the most effective ways. For example, Reddy et al. found that the Li capacity of N-doped graphene layers produced by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technique is almost doubled compared to that of pristine graphene because of the appearance of a large number of surface defects27. Wu et al. prepared N- and B-doped graphene samples by using a mixed gas of NH3BCl3 and Ar, which show a high reversible Li-capacity of >1040 mAhg−1 at a low rate of 50 mA−1, meaning that they can be charged and discharged quickly28. The significant enhancement in the performance of N-/B-doped graphene motivates active theoretical studies to understand the physical mechanism behind29,30,31,32. Zhou et al. showed that the carbon vacancies (VC) would enhance the Li adsorption on graphene due to large charge transfer from Li to the nearest neighbor carbon atoms24. Yu used density functional theory (DFT) with a dispersion correction to investigate the joint effect of N-dopant and VC on the electronic properties of graphene and its activity toward Li adsorption. His/her work confirmed that the N-decorated graphene with single and double vacancies could greatly improve the reversible lithium capacity31. Liu et al. found that the substitutional B atoms cause slight electron deficiency, which makes the adsorption of Li on the C3B monolayer easy26. Nevertheless, these pictures are not much beyond intuition and the synergy between effects of B,N-dopants and C-vacancy decorations on the improvement of Li storage capacity and conductivity remains vague, which hinders the development of graphene as anode materials in LIBs.

In the present work, we performed systematic density functional theory (DFT) calculations for the structures and energetics of different B/N/VC-decorated graphene geometries, as well as the Li adsorption and diffusion on them. We sorted out the roles of doping and vacancy decoration on the improvement of Li-adsorption on graphene, and identified several structures that have good adsorption energy, low diffusion barrier and easy preparation in experiments. Our theoretical results provide instructive guidelines for the further development of high performance C-based anode materials for LIBs.

Results and Discussions

The formation and Li-adsorption-performance of G_N x V y substrates

We first studied the adsorption configurations and energies of one Li atom on the decorated graphene cells with x N-atoms and y VC, G_NxVy (x = 0–4 and y = 0–2), corresponding to a N-concentration of ~1.4–5.6%, comparable with the experimental range for graphene samples synthesized via the thermal reaction between graphene oxide and NH3 at high temperature33. After structural optimization, we see that for y = 0, i.e., N-substituted graphene without VC, N atoms prefer to stay far away from each other to minimize the perturbation to the graphene π-electron bonds, as depicted in Table S1 in the supplementary material (SM). The C-N bond length is about 1.40–1.43 Å, very close to the C-C bond length in the pristine graphene. For y = 1 and 2, i.e., N-doped graphene with VC, the N dopants prefer to connect with two C atoms and form pyridine-like structure, which introduces a strongly localized donor states near the Fermi level34,35. The corresponding C-N bond length reduces to ~1.34 Å, deviating away from the lattice position of pristine graphene.

For each system, we explored different Li adsorption sites (cf. Table S2 in SM) and those with the lowest adsorption energies, Ead, are shown in Fig. 1. We see that the Ead of Li on the hollow site (H) of a 6 × 6 graphene supercell, 0.27 eV, is lower than that on the top site (T), 0.57 eV. The distance between Li and substrate, dLG, of the H-site, 1.72 Å, is also smaller than that of the T-site, 1.92 Å. These results indicate a single Li adatom prefers the hollow site on pristine graphene but Li atoms are more likely to form Li clusters since the value of Ead is positive, in consistent with previous results24,36 (see details in Table S3 in SM). For the adsorption of one Li atom on the G_N1V0 and G_N2V0 systems, we found that Li prefers to stay on the H-site of graphene rather than any places near the N atoms. The Ead of Li on G_N1V0 (G_N2V0) systems, 0.39 (0.34) eV, are also positive, and the corresponding values of dLG are 1.75(1.76) Å, indicating that pure N-dopings in graphene don’t improve the lithium adsorption. Strikingly with the presence of VC on pristine graphene, the Ead decreases to negative values of −1.36 eV for single VC and −0.73 eV for double VCs, as shown in Fig. 1, indicating that the adsorption of Li on the vacancy position is energetically preferred. The atomic positions in G_N0V1 have no obvious changes compared with perfect graphene due to the weak intraplanar relaxation37, whereas a typical 5–8–5 defect can be found in G_N0V2 with decreased C-C bond lengths near vacancies from 2.46 Å to 1.81 Å, as depicted in the insets in Fig. 1. Ead values decrease further for Li on the N and VC-codoped graphene sheets. For example, Ead becomes −3.12 eV for Li/G_N3V1, which implies a strong lithium adsorption on this substrate, as also demonstrated in previous experimental and theoretical studies31,32. We noted that the further increase of VC number doesn’t significantly change the Ead value, and the lowest Ead is −3.59 eV, which occurs in Li/G_N4V2. The detailed analyses of adsorption structures show that the vertical dLG is 1.43 Å for Li/G_N3V1, and decreases to 0.10 Å for Li/G_N4V2, implying that the Li atom is in the hole position surrounded by four pyridine N atoms and almost in the same plane with the N-doped graphene. Overall, the red curve in Fig. 1 that connects the lowest Ead of Li on different graphene cells suggests that the carbon vacancies play the key role in the adsorption of Li on graphene.

Figure 1: The adsorption energies (Ead) of one Li atom on the G_NxVy graphene sheets as a dependence of carbon vacancies (VC).
Figure 1

Insets are the corresponding atomic structures, where the gray sticks, blue and pink balls represent C, N and Li atoms, respectively.

Now the question is how easy to create a C-vacancy on graphene? We note that the calculated formation energy of one VC on graphene, Efor(VC), shown in Fig. 2 is extremely high, 8.01 eV. In contrast, Efor(VC) drops to 4.69 eV on N-doped graphene, and the trend of decrease continues with the further increase of N atoms, as shown in the red line in Fig. 2. The Efor(VC) of G_N3V1 has a small negative value, indicating the easy formation of the N-VC structure as a group. Similar trend appears for the formation of double-vacancies in graphene, with a very low Efor(VC) of −2.89 eV for G_N4V2. The formation energy of single N-dopant on graphene, Efor(N), is 0.91 eV, comparable with the previous DFT studies of 0.79 eV38 and 0.97 eV31. Interestingly, this value doesn’t change significantly with the increase of N dopants, as depicted in the blue line in Fig. 2 and the red curve in Figure S1(a). Here the blue solid squares show the Efor(N) of single N-dopant on the G_NxV0 substrates (shown in the insets) that were used in Efor calculations of single C-vacancy, and the error bar illustrates the Efor(N) window for different doping configurations of N on G_NxV0 (cf. more details in Table S1 in SM). Clearly, it is rather easy to insert N atoms in graphene, which serves as the precursor step for the formation of C-vacancies and consequently, enhances the Li adsorption. Considering the values of Efor of VC and N-dopings and the values of Ead of Li, we believe that G_N3V1 and G_N4V2 configurations can be easily formed and they are responsible to the enhancement of lithium capacity of graphene anode materials.

Figure 2: The formation energies (Efor) of C-vacancies and N-dopings as a dependence of the number of nitrogen atoms in the G_NxVy substrates.
Figure 2

Insets show the G_NxV0 structures used in Efor calculations without C-vacancy, where the gray sticks and blue balls represent C and N atoms, respectively.

Adsorption and diffusion of Li on B- and N-codoped G_B x N3−x V1 substrates

As we mentioned above, the graphite-like B/C/N layered materials prepared using CVD or other methods showed good performances as the anode matrix of LIBs39,40,41. Various precursors were used in experiments to create B dopings, including B4C, NaBH4, B2O3 and so on. So theoretically the Efor of single B-doping on graphene, Efor(B), changes from −5.30 eV under B-rich conditions to +8.09 eV under oxidation conditions, as shown in Figure S1(b) in SM. Although the average values of Efor(B) under typical experimental conditions, ranging from −0.23 eV with B4C precursor to +1.47 eV with NH3BH3 precursor, are a little higher than Efor(N), the calculated Efor(VC) of single C-vacancy on G_B3V1 is comparable with that of G_N3V1, and interestingly, its value for the B/N co-doped graphene, G_BxN3-xV1 (x = 0–3), is even lower than the corresponding value for the pure N-doped graphene by ~1.20 eV, as presented by the green stars in Fig. 2.

Then we give the values of Ead for Li on several adsorption sites of G_BxN3-xV1 substrates, as depicted in Fig. 3. For Li on G_B1N2V1, we found that Li in the ground state is located at the vacancy site, close to the B dopant with a dLG of 1.65 Å. A similar adsorption structure was obtained for Li/G_B2N1V1, but the Li atom is much closer to the N dopant instead of B. Strikingly, the most stable adsorption site of Li on G_B3V1 substrate is on the hollow site of the hexagonal ring adjacent to the B atom. Overall, the B and N co-doped graphene substrates give negative adsorption energies, and the values of Ead of one Li atom on G_BxN3−xV1 are in the order: G_N3V1 (−3.12 eV) < G_B2N1V1 (−1.77 eV) < G_B1N2V1 (−1.20 eV) < G_B3V1 (−0.99 eV). Obviously, all of them are more active toward the adsorption of Li, compared with pristine graphene. Using G_B2N1V0 as an example, we also studied the x-dependence of Ead (see Table S4 in SM) and found that Ead decreases with the doping concentration of B till it is smaller than 2.78%.

Figure 3: The adsorption energies of G_BxN3-xV1 systems and insets are the corresponding optimized atomic structures.
Figure 3

The initial adsorption sites of Li are denoted as numbers. The gray sticks, green and blue balls represent C, B, and N atoms, respectively.

While adsorption energies determine the Li capacity, the energy barrier of Li diffusion dictates the efficiency of charge and discharge cycles. Using the G_B3V1 substrate as an example, we calculated the Ead of Li on selected adsorption sites along the diffusion pathway of H→T→VC→H, as shown in the inset in Fig. 4 highlighted by the blue arrow, and obtained the energy barrier of Li diffusion by using ΔEad = Ead(site) − Ead(H). For each adsorption site, we fixed the lateral coordinates of Li and optimized all the other atomic positions. The energy barrier for the movement of one Li atom on G_B3V1 is only 0.41 eV, and the largest difference in dLG is about 0.27 Å. The low energy barrier and the small change in dLG indicate a relatively flat potential energy surface of G_B3V1 for the Li movement. Similarly, we studied the diffusion of Li on G_B2N1V1 and obtained ΔEad of 0.80 eV and 0.48 eV along two different pathways, and the corresponding difference in dLG of 0.83 Å and 0.56 Å, respectively (see Figure S2 in SM). Note that without B, the ΔEad of Li diffusion on G_N3V1 is 2.62 eV32, 6.5 times larger than that of G_B3V1. Clearly, the lithiation-delithiation process of Li on decorated graphene needs the joint effects of vacancy, B- and N-dopants.

Figure 4: The relative adsorption energy (left axis) and the distance between Li and G_B3V1 substrate (right axis) at different adsorption sites.
Figure 4

Insets are the corresponding adsorption configurations and the one with a red border shows the diffusion pathway.

Electronic properties of decorated graphene substrates

We performed detailed analyses on the electronic properties of various graphene substrates with/without Li adsorption, so as to understand the role of doping and/or vacancy on the Li adsorption. The total and partial density of states (DOS) of pristine graphene (G), G_B1, G_N1, and G_V1 are plotted in Fig. 5(a). The dashed line with shadow in the uppermost panel in Fig. 5(a) shows a perfect Dirac state of the pristine graphene at the Fermi level (Ef). The adsorption of Li atom keeps the DOS profile almost unchanged, but the Ef moves to the conduction states due to the addition of 1e from Li. As was well known, the Ef of B(N)-doped graphene is shifted to the valance(conduction) band, as shown in the middle panels in Fig. 5(a), indicating that G_B1(G_N1) is a hole (electron)-rich material. The adsorption of Li on G_B1 substrate compensates the hole attraction and the Dirac state of Li/G_B1 moves back to Ef, making the system stable with a negative Ead of −1.4 eV32. In contrast for Li/G_N1, we see an obvious peak existing on the Ef, coming from the N-pz orbital. For these three systems, there is little hybridization between Li and substrate/dopant. For example, the B-px,y states in G_B1 locate at ~−2.9 eV below the Ef, but the Li-s and -pz states appear at ~2.1 eV above the Ef. The attractive/repulsive electrostatic interactions between Li and substrates lead to a negative/positive Ead values. Strikingly, for G_V1 substrate, as shown in the lower panel in Fig. 5(a), there is a big peak around Ef caused by the hybridization of Li-px,y and C-px,y in-plane orbitals, and the adjacent peak at −0.7 eV below the Ef is composed of the Li-s and C-px,y orbitals. Thus the interaction between Li and G_V1 substrate is very strong, leading to a low Ead value.

Figure 5
Figure 5

The total and partial density of states (DOS) of (a) G, G_B1, G_N1, and G_V1 substrates, (b) G_B3V1 and (c) G_N3V1 substrates. The solid line and dashed line with shadow in each panel denote the DOS of substrates with and without Li adsorption, respectively. Zero energy gives the position of the Fermi level. Insets in (a) show the local atomic positions, where the gray sticks, green, blue and pink balls represent C, B, N and Li atoms, respectively. Insets in (b) and (c) are the electron redistributions within the range of ±2 × 10−3 e/Å3, and the yellow and blue isosurfaces represent electron accumulations and depletions.

Interestingly, we found that the DOS profile of G_B3V1 substrate in Fig. 5(b) is very similar with that of G_B1, with peaks of B-pz orbital near the Ef. The adsorption of Li makes the B-pz states shift to lower energies, but the hybridization of Li-s,p and B-p states is still relatively weak near the Ef. Similar with G_V1, the DOS of G_N3V1 also has a big peak right at the Ef, coming from the dangling bonds at the N atom sites. The orbital hybridizations of N-p and Li-s,p orbitals can be observed around −1.8 eV and −3.5 eV, which are responsible for the lower Ead of G_N3V1 than G_B3V1. The interaction between Li and substrate can be described more clearly by the electron redistribution, n(r) = nLi/sub(r) − nsub(r) − nLi(r), obtained from electron densities of Li on substrates, pure substrates and Li atom. As displayed in the insets in Fig. 5(b) and (c), there are obvious electron transfer from Li to dopants which enhances the binding of Li on decorated graphene substrates. The contrast between G_B3V1 and G_N3V1 manifest through the influence of N extending to the second nearest neighbors of C atoms due to the symmetry breaking of the π-electron system, whereas B appears to only affect the nearest neighbor C atoms.

In summary, we performed systematic first-principles calculations to study the adsorption and diffusion of Li on decorated graphene with B and/or N dopants and C vacancies. Our results indicate that VC sites (<3% in this study) rather than the dopants serve as attractive centers for Li adsorption on graphene. While the formation energy of one VC on graphene is as high as 8.01 eV, the N-doping drastically decreases this value to as low as −0.14 eV for G_N3V1. The co-doping of B keeps negative adsorption energies for Li, and significantly reduces the energy barrier of Li diffusion, e.g., 0.41 eV for Li/G_B3V1 and 0.48 eV for Li/G_B2N1V1. The electronic structure analyses show that the interaction between Li and B states is rather weak, whereas Li has a strong orbital hybridization with N-p states, causing a high diffusion barrier. Our theoretical studies provide clear insights for the understanding of the individual roles of doping and vacancy decorations for the performance of enhancement of N(B)-doped graphene as electrode materials in LIBs, and provide guidelines for the design of new battery materials.

Methods

Our density functional theory calculations were performed using the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP)42,43. Projector-augmented-wave (PAW) potential and the PW91 version of general gradient approximation (GGA)44 were employed to describe the electron-ionic core interactions and the exchange-correlation interaction among electrons, respectively. Our preliminary calculations by using the vdW-DF2 version of nonlocal van der Waals functional45,46 show that the inclusion of dispersion corrections in DFT don’t change the main features of Li adsorption on decorated graphene. We used an energy cutoff of 500 eV for the plane-wave basis expansion and a size-dependent Monkhorst-Pack k-points sampling in the Brillouin zone (BZ). The crystal constant and positions of the ions were fully relaxed until the final force on each atom is smaller than 0.01 eV/Å. The optimized in-plane lattice constant of graphene primitive cell is 2.47 Å, in good agreement with the experimental values of 2.46 Å derived from the X-ray crystallography of AB graphite and with previous theoretical predictions36. For the adsorption and diffusion of one Li atom on decorated graphene, we used a periodic slab consisting of a 6 × 6 graphene supercell and a vacuum layer of 12 Å along the normal direction to avoid the interaction between two adjacent images.

To assess the stability of Li adsorbed on graphene, we calculate the adsorption energy (Ead) of a Li adatom as follows

where Etot and Esub are the total energies of the graphene after and before lithium adsorption, respectively, nLi is the number of Li adatoms, and ELi is the energy of one Li atom in the body-centered cubic crystal phase. A negative value of Ead implies a spontaneous adsorption of Li atoms.

The formation energies (Efor) of defects, including N-doping and C-vacancy, on graphene are calculated as follows:

where Esub and EG are the total energies of decorated graphene and pristine graphene, respectively; ED and EC are the energies of one N atom in N2 gas and one C atom in graphene, respectively; and nD and nC are the numbers of N-dopants and C-vacancies in the supercell, respectively.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Jin, M. et al. Enhanced Absorption and Diffusion Properties of Lithium on B,N,VC-decorated Graphene. Sci. Rep. 6, 37911; doi: 10.1038/srep37911 (2016).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    , & Synthesis of nano- and micro-particles of LiMn2O4: Electrochemical investigation and assessment as a cathode in Li battery. Int. J. Electroche. Sci. 6, 2581–2595 (2011).

  2. 2.

    , & Progress in flexible lithium batteries and future prospects. Energ. Environ. Sci. 7, 1307–1338 (2014).

  3. 3.

    , & Nanomaterials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit 47, 2930–2946 (2008).

  4. 4.

    & Lithium batteries: Status, prospects and future. J. Power Sources 195, 2419–2430 (2010).

  5. 5.

    , & Li ion battery materials with core-shell nanostructures. Nanoscale 3, 3967–3983 (2011).

  6. 6.

    et al. Lithium diffusion in graphitic carbon. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 1176–1180 (2010).

  7. 7.

    , , & Insertion electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Adv. Mater. 10, 725–763 (1998).

  8. 8.

    , & Vapor-grown carbon fiber anode for cylindrical lithium ion rechargeable batteries. J. Power Sources 77, 110–115 (1999).

  9. 9.

    , , & Overcharge studies of carbon fiber composite-based lithium-ion cells. J. Power Sources 161, 640–647 (2006).

  10. 10.

    et al. Single wall carbon nanotube paper as anode for lithium-ion battery. Electrochim. Acta 51, 23–28 (2005).

  11. 11.

    et al. Direct growth of flexible carbon nanotube electrodes. Adv. Mater. 20, 566–570 (2008).

  12. 12.

    et al. Lithium storage performance of carbon nanotubes with different nitrogen contents as anodes in lithium ions batteries. Electrochim. Acta 105, 75–82 (2013).

  13. 13.

    et al. Synthesis of hierarchically porous carbon monoliths with highly ordered microstructure and their application in rechargeable lithium batteries with high-rate capability. Adv. Funct. Mater. 17, 1873–1878 (2007).

  14. 14.

    , , & Electrochemical properties of an ordered mesoporous carbon prepared by direct tri-constituent co-assembly. Carbon 45, 2628–2635 (2007).

  15. 15.

    , , , & Solid-state electrochemistry of the Li single wall carbon nanotube system. J. Electrochem. Soc. 147, 2845–2845 (2000).

  16. 16.

    et al. Lithium intercalation into opened single-wall carbon nanotubes: storage capacity and electronic properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 015502–015502 (2001).

  17. 17.

    et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666–669 (2004).

  18. 18.

    , & Graphene based new energy materials. Energ. Environ. Sci. 4, 1113–1113 (2011).

  19. 19.

    et al. Density of states calculations of small diameter single graphene sheets. J. Electrochem. Soc. 143, L262–L262 (1996).

  20. 20.

    et al. The interaction of Li+ with single-layer and few-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 10, 3386–3388 (2010).

  21. 21.

    & Li absorption and intercalation in single layer graphene and few layer graphene by first principles. Nano Lett. 12, 4624–4628 (2012).

  22. 22.

    , , & First-principles studies of Li nucleation on graphene. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 1225–1229 (2014).

  23. 23.

    , , & Adsorption of single li and the formation of small li clusters on graphene for the anode of lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 5, 7793–7797 (2013).

  24. 24.

    , & First-principles study of lithium adsorption and diffusion on graphene with point defects. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 21780–21787 (2012).

  25. 25.

    , , & First-principles studies of lithium adsorption and diffusion on graphene with grain boundaries. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 28055–28062 (2014).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Feasibility of lithium storage on graphene and its derivatives. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 1737–1742 (2013).

  27. 27.

    et al. Synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene films for lithium battery application. ACS Nano 4, 6337–6342 (2010).

  28. 28.

    , , , & Doped graphene sheets as anode materials with superhigh rate and large capacity for lithium ion batteries. Acs Nano 5, 5463–5471 (2011).

  29. 29.

    , , & Li diffusion through doped and defected graphene. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 15128–15134 (2013).

  30. 30.

    & . Improved performance of graphene doped with pyridinic N for Li-ion battery: a density functional theory model. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 12982–12987 (2013).

  31. 31.

    Can all nitrogen-doped defects improve the performance of graphene anode materials for lithium-ion batteries? Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 16819–16827 (2013).

  32. 32.

    , , , & Boron doped defective graphene as a potential anode material for Li-ion batteries. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 16502–16508 (2014).

  33. 33.

    et al. Efficient synthesis of heteroatom (N or S)-doped graphene based on ultrathin graphene oxide-porous silica sheets for oxygen reduction reactions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 3634–3640 (2012).

  34. 34.

    et al. Identification of electron donor states in N-doped carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 1, 457–460 (2001).

  35. 35.

    , , & Effect of chemical doping of boron and nitrogen on the electronic, optical, and electrochemical properties of carbon nanotubes. Prog. Mater. Sci. 58, 565–635 (2013).

  36. 36.

    , & First-principles study of metal adatom adsorption on graphene. Phys. Rev. B 77, 1–12 (2008).

  37. 37.

    , , , & Direct evidence for atomic defects in graphene layers. Nature 430, 870–873 (2004).

  38. 38.

    et al. Interplay between nitrogen dopants and native point defects in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 85, 1–9 (2012).

  39. 39.

    et al. Boron-carbon-nitrogen compounds as negative electrode matrices for rechargeable lithium battery systems. J. Power Sources 55, 127–130 (1995).

  40. 40.

    , & Intercalation chemistry of graphite-like layered material BC6N for anode of Li ion battery. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 67, 1084–1090 (2006).

  41. 41.

    et al. Large scale boron carbon nitride nanosheets with enhanced lithium storage capabilities. Chem. Commun. 49, 4–7 (2012).

  42. 42.

    & Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

  43. 43.

    & Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comp. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

  44. 44.

    , & Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

  45. 45.

    , & Fast track communication: Chemical accuracy for the van der Waals density functional. J. Phys. Condens. Mat. 22, 22201–22205 (2010).

  46. 46.

    , & Van der waals density functionals applied to solids. Phys. Rev. B 83, 772–772 (2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work was supported by the startup fund of China Thousand Young Talents, and National Basic Research Program of China (973 program, No: 2013CB934700). The calculations were supported by Tianhe2-JK in Beijing Computational Science Research Center.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Chengdu Green Energy and Green Manufacturing Technology R&D Center, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610207, China

    • Mengting Jin
    •  & Y. N. Zhang
  2. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Sichuan, 610054, China

    • L. C. Yu
  3. Sichuan New Material Research Center, Chengdu, 610207, Sichuan, China

    • W. M. Shi
    •  & J. G. Deng
  4. Institute of Chemical Materials, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang, 621900, Sichuan, China

    • W. M. Shi
    •  & J. G. Deng
  5. Beijing Computational Science Research Center, Beijing 100094, China

    • Y. N. Zhang

Authors

  1. Search for Mengting Jin in:

  2. Search for L. C. Yu in:

  3. Search for W. M. Shi in:

  4. Search for J. G. Deng in:

  5. Search for Y. N. Zhang in:

Contributions

Mengting Jin, J.G. Deng and Y.N. Zhang wrote the main manuscript text, Mengting Jin and L.C. Yu prepared Figures 1, 2 and 5, and Mengting Jin and W.M. Shi prepared Figures 3–4. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. N. Zhang.

Supplementary information

Word documents

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37911

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.