Abstract
We propose a scheme to generate macroscopic Schrödinger cat state (SCS) in diamond mechanical resonator (DMR) via the dynamical strainmediated coupling mechanism. In our model, the direct coupling between the nitrogenvacancy (NV) center and lattice strain field enables coherent spin–phonon interactions in the quantum regime. Based on a cyclic Δtype transition structure of the NV center constructed by combining the quantized mechanical strain field and a pair of external microwave fields, the populations of the different energy levels can be selectively transferred by controlling microwave fields, and the SCS can be created by adjusting the controllable parameters of the system. Furthermore, we demonstrate the nonclassicality of the mechanical SCS both in nondissipative case and dissipative case. The experimental feasibility and challenge are justified using currently available technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Recently, the nitrogenvacancy (NV) centers formed by a substitutional nitrogen atom and an adjacent lattice vacancy in diamond become the most promising solidstate platform for quantum information processing (QIP)^{1} and nanoscale sensors^{2}, due to its easy controllability and fast manipulation^{3}, as well as long coherence properties (electron spin ~1 ms and nuclear spin >1 s) in a wide temperature range, even at roomtemperature^{4,5,6,7,8}. Additionally, the NV center could couple to both optical and microwave fields simultaneously, which makes it possible be used as an excellent quantum interface between optical and solidstate systems^{9,10}.
Meantime, the hybrid system consisting of a highQ singlecrystal diamond mechanical resonator (DMR) and embedded NV centers may provide a promising platform and open up a new perspective towards achieving quantum control and studying significant quantum optics or novel quantum phenomena^{11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22}. In these systems, the embedded NV centers are highly susceptible to deformations of the surrounding lattice, where the strain field is robust against the dephasing or heating of the environment^{12,13}. Applying this direct strain coupling mechanism, previous investigations have been focused on the mechanical spin driving^{12,13,14,15}, enhancement of the coherence time of the NV center^{16}, spin squeezing^{17}, phonon cooling and lasing^{18}.
On the other hand, based on the quantum superposition principle, the generation of the macroscopic quantum superposition state such as Schrödinger cat state (SCS) has attracted abundant attention because SCS plays an important role in the study of the foundations of quantum theory^{23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31}, and brings many potentially applications, such as testing the wave function collapse^{32} and uncertainty relation^{33}. Experimentally, the macroscopic SCS has been observed in various physical systems including superconducting qubit system^{34}, ion trap^{35}, cavity QED^{36}, and linear optical system^{37}. However, generating coherent states with macroscopically distinct amplitudes in the phase space is a difficult task in nanomechanical systems^{38,39,40}, it remains a challenge to realize SCS in such systems.
In the present work, we introduce a scheme to generate macroscopic SCS in DMR via the dynamical strainmediated coupling mechanism. In our model, the direct coupling between the lattice strain field and the NV center enables coherent spin–phonon interactions in the quantum regime, and the cyclic Δtype transition structure of the NV center system could be constructed by combining the quantized mechanical strain field and a pair of external microwave fields, where onephoton and twophoton processes coexist. Using this cyclic population transfer, the population of the different energy levels of the NV center can be selectively transferred by controlling classical fields, and the SCS can be created by adjusting the controllable parameters of the system, such as the detuning between the NV center and the driving fields, along with their Rabi frequency. Here the mechanical SCS is described by the phasespace quasiprobability distribution, such as Husimi Q function and Winger function. Additionally, comparing with the nondissipative case with the dissipative case through the superoperator method^{41,42}, we find that the dissipation effect decreases the generation efficiency of SCS. Furthermore, we demonstrate the nonclassicality of the SCS in both nondissipative case and dissipative case.
Results
System and Model
As shown in Fig. 1(a), the system under consideration is a monolithic hybrid quantum device DMR including a diamond cantilever with an embedded NV center. The NV center consists of a substitutional nitrogen atom and a vacancy in an adjacent lattice site with C_{3v} symmetry^{43}. It is negatively charged with two unpaired electrons located at the vacancy, and is treated as electronic spin S = 1. The ground state is spin triplet and labeled as m_{s}〉 with m_{s} = 0, ±1. The zerofield splitting between the spin sublevels 0〉 and ±1〉 is , originating from the nonaveraged electronic spinspin interactions^{44}. In general, the quantum spin control of the NV center can be achieved with magnetic field^{45} or optical field^{46}.
In our work, we mainly study individual NV center embedded in DMR, here the coherent strain driving of the NV center is based on the sensitive response of the spin to strain in the diamond host lattice. More specifically, when the DMR vibrates, it changes the local strain and induces a strain field at the position of the NV center. The strain field (behaved as an effective local electric field^{44}) breaks the symmetry of the NV center and causes the energy shifts as well as a mixing of the states +1〉 and −1〉, which results in the direct coupling of the DMR and the transition +1〉 ↔ −1〉 of the NV center^{43,44}. It offers a new approach to mechanical driving the NV spin. The Hamiltonian of the NV center coupling to the magnetic field and the strain field can be written as^{17,44,47} (in units of the Planck constant, i.e., ħ = 1, hereafter)
where and are the external magnetic field and spin1 operator with B_{i} and S_{i} (i = x, y, z) the corresponding components, respectively. , , and are unit vectors along the x, y, z direction. ϵ_{‖(⊥)} are the stress coupling constants along the direction parallel (perpendicular) to the NV symmetry axis (here we assume that the zaxis is aligned with the NV symmetry axis). , μ_{B} is the Bohr magneton. E_{i} (i = x, y, z) are the iaxis components of the strain field. In the S_{z} basis (S_{z}m_{s}〉 = m_{s}m_{s}〉), the spin operator can be expressed as , , and with σ_{j,k} = j〉 〈k (j, k = 0, ±1) the raising or lowering operators (for j ≠ k) and energy level populations (for j = k) of the NV center. Then, the Hamiltonian H_{NV} becomes
where E_{±} = E_{x} ± iE_{y}, S_{±} = S_{x} ± iS_{y}, , , and the state 0〉 is set as the energy zero point.
The DMR can be treated as a harmonic oscillator with the Hamiltonian , where a (a^{†}) the annihilation (creation) operators of the quantized mode, and ω_{m} is the frequency of DMR. In addition, for small beam displacements, the perpendicular strain field can be quantized as E_{+} = E_{0}a and E_{−} = E_{0}a^{†} with E_{0} the strain on account of the zero point motion of the resonant mode^{17}. The NV center in diamond is highly susceptible to deformations of the surrounding lattice, therefore, the vibration due to the ground mechanical mode of the nanoresonator changes the local strain where the NV center is located, and gives rising to an effective, straininduced electric field E_{0}, which results into the magneticallyforbidden transition +1〉 ↔ −1〉 with the related spinphonon coupling strength λ = −ϵ_{⊥}E_{0}^{43,44}. As a result, the cyclic Δtype transition among all three spin levels of the NV center has been formed, as illustrated in Fig. 1b. The whole system can be written as + , where H.c. represents the conjugate Hermitian, and . In the interacting picture, the Hamiltonian H_{2} changes into
where Δ_{1(2)} = ω_{+(−)} − ω_{1(2)} represent the corresponding detunings between the transition frequencies ω_{+(−)} of the NV center and the frequencies of the classical microwave fields, respectively. Here the relation ω_{1} − ω_{2} = ω_{m} has been set.
Generation of the SCS
In this section, we focus on how to generate the SCS via the dynamical strainmediated coupling mechanism, based on the cyclic Δtype transition structure.
To intuitively describe the main mechanism of how to create the SCS, we transform the cyclic Δtype transition configuration in Fig. 1b into an effective Λtype transition structure in Fig. 1c. Here the transitions +1〉 ↔ ±〉 are induced by two displaced quantized phonon fields in Fig. 1c, which results from the quantized phonon field coupling to the transition +1〉 ↔ −1〉 in Fig. 1b, through an unitary transformation. Concretely speaking, the dressed states ±〉 have the following relation between the −1〉 and 0〉 states as and with the mixing angle θ = arctan[2G_{2}/Δ_{2}].
Based on this Λtype transition structure in Fig. 1c, the effective Hamiltonian H_{eff} has the following form H_{eff} = H_{11} + H_{+−} with
and
where p = a + k_{1} and q = a − k_{2} with k_{1} = G_{1} tan(θ/2)/λ, k_{2} = G_{1} cot(θ/2)/λ. σ_{j,k} = j〉 〈k (j, k = +1, ±). The other controllable parameters are λ_{1} = λ cos(θ/2), λ_{2} = λ sin(θ/2), , , , and Δ_{±} = Δ_{1} − ε_{±} with the dressed frequency . The details of our deductions are presented in Section of Method.
In the large detuning case , the upper state +1〉 can be adiabatically eliminated by using the rotating wave approximation and the method of FröhlichNakajima transformation (FNT)^{48}. As a result, we obtain the Hamiltonian H_{+−} = H_{+}σ_{+,+} + H_{−}σ_{−,−} with
and
Note that the Hamiltonian H_{+−} can be employed to generate the SCS because both the Hamiltonian H_{+} and H_{−} also describe the forced harmonic oscillator.
Assuming that the whole system is initially in the state , where the DMR is initially prepared in the vacuum state 0〉_{m}, while the NV center is in the ground state ^{14}. According to the unitary operator U = exp(−iH_{+−}t), the whole system evolves into the timedependent state
where and represent the coherent states of DMR. and are the timedependent global phases, and we denote the phase difference between α〉 and β〉 by δ_{AB}. Note that the state is an entangled cat state with different coherent states α〉 and β〉 (α ≠ β), and it is an entanglement between the mechanical phonon state and the NV center. If the readout result of the NV center is 0〉, the mechanical phonon state becomes , which is a standard mechanical SCS. In experiments, the relation between the population of 0〉 and the phase difference δ_{AB} has been used to directly detect the SCS . In our work, we will verify the existence of the mechanical SCS by calculating the overlap between these two coherent states α〉 and β〉 as
with ω_{d} = ω_{p} − ω_{q}.
In the following, we use the quantum master equation to investigate the decoherence effect as
where is the standard Lindblad superoperator that describes the dissipation effects. γ and κ represent the decay rate of the NV center and the DMR, respectively. denotes the equilibrium phonon occupation number at temperature T with k_{B} the Boltzmann constant. In the basis {+〉, −〉}, using the superoperator method^{41}, the analytical results can be obtained as
where (i, j = +, −) represent the matrix elements of the , and the superoperator is . In our calculation, the operator disenable equation has been used, when . If the readout result of the NV center is 0〉, the density matrix with respect to the mechanical phonon state is
where, α_{d}〉 and β_{d}〉 represent the coherent states with and . The other parameters are ε_{d} = ε_{+} − ε_{−}, , and
with dissipative factor . Using the similar method, we also calculate the overlap between theses two coherent states α_{d}〉 and β_{d}〉 in the dissipative case as with
where and .
In Fig. 2, we plot the time evolution of R(t) (nondissipative case) in Eq. (10) and R_{d}(t) (dissipative case) in Eq. (18) under the different Rabi frequencies G_{2}. In nondissipative case, as shown in Fig. 2(a), the exponent R(t) of the overlap between coherent states changed periodically and symmetrically, and it has the identical maximum value in each period, which means that the overlap 〈β_{d}α_{d}〉 becomes minimum at these times. Besides, we find that the larger the amount of Rabi frequency G_{2} is, the higher the maximal value of R(t) can reach, at the cost of the longer oscillation period. In dissipative case in Fig. 2(b), the symmetry and the periodicity on R_{d}(t) is destroyed, and the maximum values of the exponent R_{d}(t) decreases due to the dissipation effect. Combining this dissipative case with nondissipative case, we come to the conclusion that the common feature that the small modulation overimposed on the larger modulation exists in both the nondissipative and dissipative case, and the period of R(t) is partly determined by the Rabi frequency G_{2}. Therefore the generation of SCS can be optimized by adjusting the Rabi frequency G_{2}.
To visualize the time evolution of the mechanical phonon state, we firstly calculate the phasespace quasiprobability distribution using the Husimi Q function^{49,50} spanned by the dimensionless field quadratures Re(α_{Q}) and Im(α_{Q}). The Husimi Q function is defined as with α_{Q} = x + iy the arbitrary complex number and the mechanical phonon state. In Fig. 3, we plot the Husimi Q function of DMR phonon state at different times as t = 0, 9, 17, 28, 39, 47, 56, which correspond to the extreme time point of the exponent R(t) (G_{2} = 1.5) in the first period in Fig. 2(a). In the upper panel of Fig. 3 (the nondissipative case with κ = 0), one can find that the DMR is initially prepared in the vacuum state, then gradually changed into the SCS, and finally evolve back into the vacuum state. In the presence of dissipation effect, i.e., κ = 0.02, as shown in the lower panel of the Fig. 3, the SCS can also be obtained with highfidelity because the dissipation effect brings slight influence.
To show the interference fringes and nonclassicality of the mechanical SCS, the phasespace quasiprobability distribution using the Wigner function was also calculated in the phase space^{51}, as shown in Fig. 4. In general, the quantum state could be judged to be nonclassical by checking that the Wigner function is negative in phase space. The Wigner function has the relation with the density operator ρ of the quantum state in the Fock state representation as with the displacement operator (α_{W} = x + iy is the arbitrary complex number) and the parity operator P = exp(iπa^{†}a)^{52}. In Fock space, we have Pn〉 = (−1)^{n} n〉. Similar to the Husimi Q function, we plot the Wigner function on the SCS at the different times under the nondissipative case (upper panel of the Fig. 4) and dissipative case (lower panel of the Fig. 4). One can find that the interference fringes appear under these two different cases, and it verifies the quantum features of the mechanical SCS of DMR due to the negative values of the Wigner function. Note that several experimental schemes^{53,54} have been proposed to measure the Winger function with respect to the vibrational cat state.
To more describe quantitatively the quantum features of the mechanical SCS of DMR, we employ the negative volume δ of the Wigner function defined by Kenfack et al.^{55}, as a quantitative measure of nonclassicality, where a nonzero value of δ indicates nonclassicality. The negative volume associated with a quantum state can be written as
where
is the Wigner function of state in the coherent state representation, which satisfies the normalization condition . It means that the larger the value of the negative volume δ is, the stronger the classicality of the mechanical phonon state is. In Fig. 5, the negative volume δ of Wigner function associated with the mechanical SCS is shown as a function of time t, where the nonzero value of δ verifies the nonclassicality of the SCS, and the dissipation effect decreases the nonclassicality of the SCS during most of the evolution process.
Discussion
We briefly address the experimental feasibility of our scheme. In general, the strain field could be produced by means of the thin piezoelectric^{11,12,13,14,15,16,17} or piezomagnetic^{56,57} film grown on the surface of the diamond layer, where, the piezoelectric or piezomagnetic film behaves as a transducer that transforms the signal between the external electric or magnetic field signal and the lattice vibration. Applying a voltage (magnetic field) across the piezoelectric film (piezomagnetic film), the strain field formed into the DMR. It implies that the strain field can be well controlled by the external electric or magnetic field. For a doubly clamped diamond beam with dimensions , the coupling strength λ between the NV center and the DMR can be estimated by using the EulerBernoulli thin beam elasticity theory^{58}. If the NV center is located near the surface of the beam, we have with ρ and E the mass density and the Young’s modulus of diamond, respectively. Assuming that the dimension of the DMR is on the scale of ~μm^{17} and the DMR’s vibrational frequency ω_{m} is about 0.1~10 GHz^{18}, the coupling strength λ can be estimated as several kHz in our case. Besides, highquality factor DMRs with Q = 10^{5} − 10^{6} have also been demonstrated in experiments^{21,22}, therefore the mechanical damping rate κ = ω_{m}/Q can be less than 1 kHz, which could be further decreased by reducing the DMR’s dimensions^{59,60} or improving the quality factor of DMR.
In addition, the preparation of the initial state in our scheme requires that the DMR is cool to the quantized ground state and the NV center is in the ground state, which can be realized in experiments. On one hand, several groups have demonstrated the mechanical resonator can be cooled to the quantum ground state^{39,61,62}. For example, the experiment using conventional cryogenic refrigeration has demonstrated that the mechanical resonator can be cooled to its quantum ground state with the maximum phonon number 〈n_{max}〉 < 0.07 and the probability >93%, through coupling the microwavefrequency mechanical oscillator to a superconducting phase qubit^{39}. Additionally, recent work^{62} has realized an approximately 10 MHz micromechanical oscillator cooling to the quantum ground state with the phonon occupation 0.34 ± 0.05 using the sideband cooling technique, where the mechanical resonator is parametrically coupled to a superconducting microwave resonant circuit. Very recently, the topical review^{63} summarized three theoretical phonon cooling protocols on the present DMR system in our model, established for both strain and magnetically mediated interactions between the orbital and spin degrees of freedom of NV center and DMR phonons. On the other hand, the ground state of the NV center is also derived experimentally^{14}. In addition, the excellent coherence properties of NV center has been demonstrated in experiment with the spin relaxation time T_{1}~100 seconds^{64} and the spin dephasing time T_{2} = 10 milliseconds^{4} at low temperature. Comparing with the decay of the DMR, the decay of the NV center is negligible. Furthermore, we emphasized that our work has the essential difference with the previous work^{26}, where the coupling was achieved by means of a strong magnetic field gradient from a nearby magnetic tip, and the spatial quantum superposition state for the diamond’s centerofmass oscillation was generated via the magnetic field gradient induced the NV center electron spin and the mechanical oscillation coupling. Here we use intrinsic strain coupling between mechanical oscillator and the NV center to generate the macroscopic quantum superposition states. Larger magnetic field gradient is not needed.
For more technical aspects, we notice that a hybrid device that integrating a microscale diamond beam with a single embedded NV center spin to a superconducting coplanar waveguide cavity was proposed^{65}, where the diamond beam phonon can strongly couple to the cavity photon via a dielectric interaction through an ac electric field. Based on this method, quantum state transfer between the mechanical mode and the cavity can be realized. For instance, if we map the mechanical phonon state into the cavity field completely, the Wigner function of SCS can be constructed by quantum homodyne tomography via detecting the cavity photons^{50,66,67}. In addition, several theoretical and experimental schemes have been proposed to detect the cat state in different physical systems, perhaps the most possible achievable measurement to our mechanical SCS is analogy of the experimental techniques applied in the system of trapped ion^{68,69}, where the quantum mechanical interference between the localized wave packets of the motional states of ions can be directly measured by detecting the probability of the ion’s internal state.
In summary, we utilize the cyclic Δtype transition structure in the DMR system to generate the nonclassical mechanical SCS through the dynamical strainmediated coupling mechanism. Using this cyclic population transfer, the populations of the different energy levels of the NV center can be selectively transferred by controlling classical fields, and the SCS can be created by adjusting the controllable parameters of the system. Our scheme also provides another route for building a distributed QIP architecture, where each DMR unit acts as a quantum node, and quantum information is transferred and processed in and between the NV centers at spatially different DMR. It may be a significant step toward the future fullscale quantuminformation processor based on increasingly developed nanoscale solidstate technology.
Method
The deduction of the Hamiltonian H_{+−} (Eqs ( 6 and 7 )) using the FNT method
Firstly, we consider the subHamiltonian containing the two lower states 0〉 and −1〉 of the NV center. It is easy to derive its eigenstates as and and the corresponding eigenvalues . The mixing angle is θ = arctan[2G_{2}/Δ_{2}] and the dressed frequency is .
Thus, we can rewritten the total Hamiltonian of the system H as H = H_{f} + H_{i} with
and
where p = a + k_{1} and q = a − k_{2} can be treated as the displaced boson operators. The other four controllable parameters are λ_{1} = λ cos(θ/2), λ_{2} = λ sin(θ/2), k_{1} = G_{1} tan(θ/2)/λ, and k_{2} = G_{1} cot(θ/2)/λ, respectively. Therefore, the effective Λlike threelevel transition of NV center has been established, as shown in Fig. 1c. The transition +1〉 ↔ ±〉 are coupled to the displaced quantized phonon field with the operators p and q, respectively, and the corresponding coupling strengths are λ_{1} and λ_{2}. As a result, the quantized phonon field coupling to the transition +1〉 ↔ −1〉 has been transformed into two displaced quantized phonon field coupling two transition +1〉 ↔ ±〉 by this unitary transformation.
In order to better understand the mechanism to prepare the nonclassical mechanical SCS, in the large detuning limit , we can separate the upper state +1〉 from the two lower states ±〉 and adiabatically eliminate the transitions +1〉 ↔ ±〉 by using the FNT method^{48}. We consider the total Hamiltonian H consisting of the free Hamiltonian H_{f} and the interaction Hamiltonian H_{i}, and use the general perturbation theory to treat the interaction part H_{i} as a perturbation term comparing with the free part H_{f}. Then, an unitary transformation is used to the Hamiltonian H, and derived an effective Hamiltonian H_{eff} as with O an antiHermitian operator. Further, by using the BakerCampbellHausdorff formula^{70}, the effective Hamiltonian H_{eff} could be simplified to
where the condition H_{i} + [H_{f}, O] = 0 has been used, which determines the form of antiHermitian operator O.
In general, the eigenvectors {i〉 = +1〉, ±〉} (corresponding to the eigenvalues E_{i} = Δ_{1}, ε_{±}) for the free Hamiltonian H_{f} are known. Taking the matrix elements of the equation H_{i} + [H_{f}, O] = 0 on the basis i〉, we can obtain with , , and Δ_{±} = Δ_{1} − ε_{±}.
Then, substituting the expression of H_{f}, H_{i}, and O into the Eq. (23), the effective Hamiltonian H_{eff} can be rewritten as H_{eff} = H_{11} + H_{+−} with
and
with the parameters and .
By substituting the expressions p = a + k_{1} and q = a − k_{2} into the Hamiltonian H_{11}, we can obtain with describing a typical forced harmonic oscillator.
In addition, using the rotating wave approximation, we write the Hamiltonian H_{+−} as H_{+−} = H_{+}σ_{+,+} + H_{−}σ_{−,−} with
and
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Hou, Q. et al. Generation of macroscopic Schrödinger cat state in diamond mechanical resonator. Sci. Rep. 6, 37542; doi: 10.1038/srep37542 (2016).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Childress, L. et al. Coherent Dynamics of Coupled Electron and Nuclear Spin Qubits in Diamond. Science 314, 281–285 (2006).
Rondin, L. et al. Magnetometry with nitrogenvacancy defects in diamond. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 056503 (2014).
Jelezko, F. et al. Observation of Coherent Oscillations in a Single Electron Spin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 076401 (2004).
Balasubramanian, G. et al. Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond. Nat. Mater. 8, 383–387 (2009).
Maurer, P. C. et al. RoomTemperature Quantum Bit Memory Exceeding One Second. Science 336, 1283–1286 (2012).
van der Sar, T. et al. Decoherenceprotected quantum gates for a hybrid solidstate spin register. Nature 484, 82–86 (2012).
Yao, N. Y. et al. Scalable architecture for a room temperature solidstate quantum information processor. Nat. Commun. 3, 800 (2012).
Liang, Z.T. et al. Proposal for implementing universal superadiabatic geometric quantum gates in nitrogenvacancy centers. Phys. Rev. A 93, 040305(R) (2016).
Imamoğlu, A. Cavity QED Based on Collective Magnetic Dipole Coupling: Spin Ensembles as Hybrid TwoLevel Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 083602 (2009).
Yang, W. L. et al. Quantum simulation of an artificial Abelian gauge field using nitrogenvacancycenter ensembles coupled to superconducting resonators. Phys. Rev. A 86, 012307 (2012).
Ovartchaiyapong, P. et al. Dynamic strainmediated coupling of a single diamond spin to a mechanical resonator. Nat. Commun. 5, 4429 (2014).
Teissier, J. et al. Strain coupling of a nitrogenvacancy center spin to a diamond mechanical oscillator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 020503 (2014).
Barfuss, A. et al. Strong mechanical driving of a single electron spin. Nat. Phys. 11, 820–824 (2015).
MacQuarrie, E. R. et al. Mechanical spin control of nitrogenvacancy centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 227602 (2013).
MacQuarrie, E. R. et al. Coherent control of a nitrogenvacancy center spin ensemble with a diamond mechanical resonator. Optica. 2, 233–238 (2015).
MacQuarrie, E. R. et al. Continuous dynamical decoupling of a single diamond nitrogenvacancy center spin with a mechanical resonator. Phys. Rev. B 92, 224419 (2015).
Bennett, S. D. et al. Phononinduced spinspin interactions in diamond nanostructures: application to spin squeezing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 156402 (2013).
Kepesidis, K. V. et al. Phonon cooling and lasing with nitrogenvacancy centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 88, 064105 (2013).
Meesala, S. et al. Enhanced Strain Coupling of NitrogenVacancy Spins to Nanoscale Diamond Cantilevers. Phys. Rev. Applied 5, 034010 (2016).
Xu, Q., Yang, W. L. & Yin, Z.q. Phonon induced twomode squeezing of nitrogenvacancy center ensembles. arXiv:1512.08605 (2015).
Tao, Y., Boss, J. M., Moores, B. A. & Degen, C. L. Singlecrystal diamond nanomechanical resonators with quality factors exceeding one million. Nat. Commun. 5, 3638 (2014).
Khanaliloo, B., Mitchell, M., Hryciw, A. C. & Barclay, P. E. HighQ/V Monolithic Diamond Microdisks Fabricated with Quasiisotropic Etching. Nano Letters 15, 5131–5136 (2015).
Bose, S., Jacobs, K. & Knight, P. L. Preparation of nonclassical states in cavities with a moving mirror. Phys. Rev. A 56, 4175–4186 (1997).
Armour, A. D., Blencowe, M. P. & Schwab, K. C. Entanglement and Decoherence of a Micromechanical Resonator via Coupling to a CooperPair Box. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 148301 (2002).
RomeroIsart, O. et al. Large Quantum Superpositions and Interference of Massive NanometerSized Objects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 020405 (2011).
Yin, Z. Q., Li, T. C., Zhang, X. & Duan, L. M. Large quantum superpositions of a levitated nanodiamond through spinoptomechanical coupling. Phys. Rev. A 88, 033614 (2013).
Marshall, W., Simon, C., Penrose, R. & Bouwmeester, D. Towards Quantum Superpositions of a Mirror. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 130401 (2003).
Abdi, M. et al. Quantum State Engineering with Circuit Electromechanical ThreeBody Interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 173602 (2015).
Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge, 2000).
Zhu, S.L., Wang, Z. D. & Zanardi, P. Geometric Quantum Computation and Multiqubit Entanglement with Superconducting Qubits inside a Cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 100502 (2005).
Yu, L. B. et al. Implementing multiqubit entanglement of twolevel systems inside a superconducting phase qubit. Euro. Phys. J. D. 61, 499–505 (2011).
Gangat, A. A. Observing controlled state collapse in a single mechanical oscillator via a direct probe of energy variance. Phys. Rev. A 88, 063846 (2013).
Kippenberg, T. J. & Vahala, K. J. Cavity Optomechanics: BackAction at the Mesoscale. Science 321, 1172–1176 (2008).
Vlastakis, B. et al. Deterministically Encoding Quantum Information Using 100Photon Schröinger Cat States. Science 342, 607–610 (2013).
Leibfried, D. et al. Creation of a sixatom ‘Schröinger cat’ state. Nature 438, 639–642 (2005).
Raimond, J. M., Brune, M. & Haroche, S. Reversible Decoherence of a Mesoscopic Superposition of Field States. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1964–1967 (1997).
Ourjoumtsev, A. et al. Generation of optical ‘Schröinger cats’ from photon number states. Nature 448, 784–786 (2007).
Huang, X. M. H. et al. Nanoelectromechanical systems: Nanodevice motion at microwave frequencies. Nature 421, 496 (2003).
O’Connell, A. D. et al. Quantum ground state and singlephonon control of a mechanical resonator. Nature 464, 697–703 (2010).
Liao, J.Q., Huang, J.F. & Tian, L. Generation of macroscopic Schrödinger’s cat states in qubitoscillator systems. Phys. Rev. A 93, 033853 (2016).
Peixoto de Faria, J. G. & Nemes, M. C. Dissipative dynamics of the JaynesCummings model in the dispersive approximation: analytical results. Phys. Rev. A 59, 3918–3925 (1999).
Song, W.l. et al. Onestep generation of multipartite entanglement among nitrogenvacancy center ensembles. Sci. Rep. 5, 7755 (2015).
Maze, J. R. Gali et al. Properties of nitrogenvacancy centers in diamond: the group theoretic approach. New J. Phys. 13, 025025 (2011).
Doherty, M. W. et al. Theory of the groundstate spin of the NV^{−} center in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 85, 205203 (2012).
Fuchs, G. D. et al. Gigahertz Dynamics of a Strongly Driven Single Quantum Spin. Science 326, 1520–1522 (2009).
Yale, C. G. et al. Alloptical control of a solidstate spin using coherent dark states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7595–7600 (2013).
Dolde, F. et al. Electricfield sensing using single diamond spins. Nat. Phys. 7, 459–463 (2011).
Fröhlich, H. Theory of the superconducting state. I. the ground state at the absolute zero of temperature. Phys. Rev. 79, 845–856 (1950).
Kôdi, H. Some formal properties of the density matrix. Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn. 22, 264–314 (1940).
Kirchmair, G. et al. Observation of quantum state collapse and revival due to the singlephoton Kerr effect. Nature 495, 205–209 (2013).
Wigner, E. P. On the Quantum Correction For Thermodynamic Equilibrium. Phy. Rev. 40, 749–759 (1932).
Cahill, K. E. & Glauber, R. J. Density Operators and Quasiprobability Distributions. Phys. Rev. 177, 1882–1902 (1969).
Leibfried, D. et al. Experimental Determination of the Motional Quantum State of a Trapped Atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4281–4285 (1996).
Lutterbach, L. G. & Davidovich, L. Method for Direct Measurement of the Wigner Function in Cavity QED and Ion Traps. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2547–2550 (1997).
Kenfack, A. & Zyczkowski, K. Negativity of the Wigner function as an indicator of nonclassicality. J. Opt. B, Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 6, 396–404 (2004).
Cai, J., Jelezko, F. & Plenio, M. B. Hybrid sensors based on colour centres in diamond and piezoactive layers. Nat. Commun. 5, 4065 (2014).
Schuetz, M. J. A. et al. Universal Quantum Transducers Based on Surface Acoustic Waves. Phys. Rev. X 5, 031031 (2015).
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. Theory of Elasticity (ButterworthHeinemann, Oxford, 1986).
Soykal, Ö. O., Ruskov, R. & Tahan, C. SoundBased Analogue of Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics in Silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 235502 (2011).
Albrecht, A., Retzker, A., Jelezko, F. & Plenio, M. B. Coupling of nitrogen vacancy centres in nanodiamonds by means of phonons. New J. Phys. 15, 083014 (2013).
WilsonRae, I., Zoller, P. & Imamoğlu, A. Laser Cooling of a Nanomechanical Resonator Mode to its Quantum Ground State. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 075507 (2004).
Teufel, J. D. et al. Sideband cooling of micromechanical motion to the quantum ground state. Nature 475, 359–363 (2011).
Lee, D. et al. Topical Review: Spins and mechanics in diamond. arXiv:1609.00418 (2016).
Jarmola, A. et al. Temperature and MagneticFieldDependent Longitudinal Spin Relaxation in NitrogenVacancy Ensembles in Diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 197601 (2012).
Li, P.B. et al. Hybrid quantum device based on NV centers in diamond nanomechanical resonators plus superconducting waveguide cavities. Phys. Rev. Applied 4, 044003 (2015).
Hofheinz, M. et al. Synthesizing arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator. Nature 459, 546–549 (2009).
Bertet, P. et al. Direct measurement of the Wigner function of a onephoton Fock state in a cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 200402 (2002).
Monroe, C., Meekhof, D. M., King, B. E. & Wineland, D. J. A. “Schrödinger cat” superposition state of an atom. Science 272, 1131–1136 (1996).
Kienzler, D. et al. Observation of quantum interference between separated mechanical oscillator wave packets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 140402 (2016).
Witschel, W. Ordered products of exponential operators by similarity transformations. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 20, 1233–1241 (1981).
Acknowledgements
We thank ShiLiang Zhu for enlightening discussions. This work was supported by the NKRDP of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0301803), the NSFC (Grant No. 11474153), and the PCSIRT (Grant No. IRT1243). W. L. Yang was supported by the NSFC (Grants No. 11574353 and No. 11274351). Z. Q. Yin was supported by the NSFC (Grants No. 61435007 and No. 11474177).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.Q.Z. and Y.W.L. conceive the idea and carry out the research. H.Q.Z., Y.W.L., C.C.Y. and Y.Z.Q. discuss the results and write the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Hou, Q., Yang, W., Chen, C. et al. Generation of macroscopic Schrödinger cat state in diamond mechanical resonator. Sci Rep 6, 37542 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37542
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37542
This article is cited by

Dynamical entropic measure of nonclassicality of phasedependent family of Schrödinger cat states
Scientific Reports (2023)

Nanomechanical cat states generated by a dc voltagedriven Cooper pair box qubit
npj Quantum Information (2022)

Phasespace studies of backscattering diffraction of defective Schrödinger cat states
Scientific Reports (2021)

Preparing entangled states between two NV centers via the damping of nanomechanical resonators
Scientific Reports (2017)