Low hydrophilicity of graphene is one of the major obstacles for biomaterials application. To create some hydrophilic groups on graphene is addressed this issue. Herein, COOH+ ion implantation modified graphene (COOH+/graphene) and COOH functionalized graphene were designed by physical ion implantation and chemical methods, respectively. The structure and surface properties of COOH+/graphene and COOH functionalized graphene were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and contact angle measurement. Compared with graphene, COOH+/graphene and COOH functionalized graphene revealed improvement of cytocompatibility, including in vitro cell viability and morphology. More importantly, COOH+/graphene exhibited better improvement effects than functionalized graphene. For instance, COOH+/graphene with 1 × 1018 ions/cm2 showed the best cell-viability, proliferation and stretching. This study demonstrated that ion implantation can better improve the cytocompatibility of the graphene.
In recent years, graphene, as an outstanding two-dimensional (2D) monolayer of carbon atoms, has attracted considerable attention due to its extraordinary properties including large surface area, excellent thermal conductivity, large mechanical fracture strength, high optical transmittance and superb charge-carrier mobility1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. In the biomedical field, such as tissue engineering, implants, bioimaging, biosensors, drug delivery and regenerative medicine, the graphene with unique physicochemical properties was expected to show enhanced performance originating from aforementioned advantages9,10,11,12,13,14. However, the low hydrophilicity, insufficient biocompatibility and bioactivity of graphene prevent from its biomedical applications15. Therefore, the surface functionalization of graphene is a crucial process to promote the biological properties16,17.
Previous studies revealed that the COOH modified carbon nanotubes (COOH-CNTs) exhibited the promising effects on biocompatibility due to the active functional groups18. In comparison to CNTs, graphene with larger surface area and more active edges is more likely to form defects with easy modification8,14. Hence, tailoring the biological properties of graphene via carboxyl should be an ideal approach to extend the potential applications of graphene in biomaterial field19.
Ion implantation, which can modify the structure of a target-near-surface though high-energy ions, is one of the most powerful techniques in modifying surfaces20. Furthermore, ion implantation with the technological simplicity and cleanliness mainly modifies the surface characteristics without affecting bulk properties18,21. In this research, graphene were bombarded by ion implantation, and the COOH+/graphene with different implant doses were created by adjusting the injecting time. The surface modification via chemical method is also considered to enhance the biocompatibility of graphene22. Herein, both ion implantation and chemical method were employed to modify the graphene, as described in Fig. 1. The interaction between cells and graphene, COOH+/graphene or COOH functionalized graphene were evaluated by L-929 fibroblast cells in vitro.
Characterization of graphene, COOH+/graphene and COOH functionalized graphene
SEM and TEM were used to characterize the morphologies and structures of graphene and its functionalized derivatives, as shown in Fig. 2. Graphene with the thin, randomly crumpled sheets is associated with each other, as it is showed in Fig. 2(A–C). The COOH+/graphene (Fig. 2D–F) exhibits some wrinkled edges and layer-by-layer structure. Both graphene and COOH+/graphene reveal similar microstructures, indicating that the ion implantation does not significantly affect the 3D profile of graphene. However, the obvious morphology changes were observed after chemical functionalization of graphene. SEM and TEM images (Fig. 2G–I) of COOH functionalized graphene can be clearly identified as ‘building blocks’ and reveal obvious aggregation throughout oxidization process.
As shown in Fig. 3A, the FTIR spectra of graphene show dominant peaks corresponding to skeletal vibration and C≡C stretching vibration1,23. And the COOH+/graphene and COOH functionalized graphene show the similar FTIR spectra. The broad absorption at 1750 cm−1 suggested the existence of C=O stretching vibration, confirming the formation of -COOH on the COOH+/graphene and COOH functionalized graphene2,24. In addition, the COOH+/graphene causes the appearance of absorption band centered at 3400 cm−1, which is attributed to the O-H stretching bands of hydroxy and carboxylic moieties. These results indicate that the COOH group was successfully introduced into COOH+/graphene and COOH functionalized graphene.
The Raman spectra of graphene, COOH+/graphene, and COOH functionalized graphene show the D-band at 1340 cm−1 and the G-band at 1580 cm−1 (Fig. 3B)25. The G band is assigned to the first order scattering of the E2g phonon from sp2 carbon atoms. And the D band is attributed to a breathing mode of κ-point photons of A1g symmetry which is related to the local sp3 disorder band formation especially the ones located at the edges of graphite sheets2. The intensity ratio (ID/IG) of the graphene increased from 0.92 to 0.97 after surface modified as shown in Fig. 3C. The high ratios of ID/IG indicate the increased disorder in carbon materials26. Therefore, more defects are caused by the introduction of COOH. Different from FTIR, the Raman spectra are sensitive to the framework vibration of graphene (such as C-C) instead of the polar groups (such as C-O)27. As a result, after the COOH is introduced into graphene by the chemical and physical methods, both samples show similar ID/IG.
The XPS elemental analysis and peak fitting results are shown in Fig. 4(A–C). As shown in Fig. 4A, the C1s peak of graphene at ~285 eV is fitted into two peaks located at 285.7 and 284.6 eV, which match well with the C=O and C-C (sp2) groups, respectively28,29. In Fig. 4B and C, C1s XPS spectra of COOH functionalized graphene and COOH+/graphene show five peaks ascribed to C=C, C-C, C=O, C-O, O=C-O26,28,29,30,31, which means that COOH functional groups are successfully introduced into graphene via ion implantation and chemical method. These results are consistent with FTIR. On the other hand, the COOH functionalized graphene obviously shows a higher proportion of oxygen containing functional groups than COOH+/graphene. Based on the XPS results, the atomic percentage of oxygen in graphene, COOH functionalized graphene and COOH+/graphene with three inject doses (1 × 1017, 5 × 1017, 1 × 1018 ions/cm2) are 6.97 atm.%, 16.13 atm.%, 10.73 atm.%, 10.77 atm.% and 11 atm.%, respectively. Compared with COOH+/graphene, the COOH functionalized graphene contains more oxygen containing functional groups.
The graphene hydrophilicity was evaluated by contact angle method26. The inset images of Fig. 4D show that the contact angles images of graphene, COOH functionalized graphene and COOH+/graphene with three inject doses (1 × 1017, 5 × 1017, 1 × 1018 ions/cm2). And the bar chart (Fig. 4D) shows that the contact angles of these materials are 94.25 ± 2°, 54.11 ± 2°, 45.38 ± 2°, 30.16 ± 2° and 29.79 ± 2°, respectively. This illustrates that the existence of COOH effectively improves the hydrophilicity of graphene. Interestingly, COOH+/graphene has a smaller amount of oxygen, but its hydrophilicity is higher than COOH functionalized graphene. It might be because ion implantation only modifies the surface characteristics of graphene. Thus, a large number of COOH+ ions gather at the surface of COOH+/graphene with higher hydrophilicity.
In vitro cytocompatibility studies
L929 cells were used to estimate the cytocompatibility of samples by MTT assay in vitro. In Fig. 5, the numbers of living cells were recorded by optical density (OD) at 1d, 2d, 4d, 6d, 8d after they were seeded on the surface of graphene, COOH functionalized graphene, COOH+/graphene and culture plate (blank). As shown in Fig. 5, L-929 cells grow well on all the samples during a culture course. Differing from blank and graphene, the cells numbers of COOH functionalized graphene and COOH+/graphene show the maximum at 6d. And the proliferation of cells on COOH+/graphene is obviously enhanced compared with COOH functionalized graphene. Moreover, the cells numbers of COOH+/graphene increase with the dose of ion implantation. Compared with blank (24-well culture plate), the maximum cells of graphene and COOH functionalized graphene don’t significantly increase. But COOH+ ions implantation obviously improves the cytocompatibility of graphene.
To further clarify the samples’ cytocompatibility, the morphologies of cells seeded on graphene, COOH functionalized graphene and COOH+/graphene for 48 h were observed by SEM, as shown in Fig. 6. It indicates that the L-929 cells cultured on the COOH modified graphene show higher density than those on graphene (Fig. 6A,C,E). Especially, the surface of COOH+/graphene exhibits the largest ammout of L929 cells, and its cells are spread well with longer processus pseudopodia (Fig. 6F) than the COOH functionalized graphene (Fig. 6D) and graphene (Fig. 6B). The cells on graphene exhibit slender morphology, probably due to the poor adhesion of cells (Fig. 6B). As a result, it indicates that COOH+/graphene show the best effect to promote cells adhesion and proliferation.
First of all, the results of FT-IR and XPS verify that the COOH is successfully introduced into COOH+/graphene and COOH functionalized graphene (Figs 3 and 4). The COOH functionalized graphene holds more oxygen containing functional groups compared with COOH+/graphene, which is proved by Raman and XPS results (Figs 3B and 4B,C). More defects in carbon materials have been identified by Raman with the high ratios of ID/IG. Higher rates of C=O, C-O and O=C-O in COOH functionalized graphene were observed than those in COOH+/graphene, as shown in Fig. 4B,C. Generally, the more oxygen containing functional groups existed in materials’ surfaces with better hydrophilic property. However, the COOH+/graphene shows better hydrophilicity than COOH functional groups (Fig. 4D). It is because the carboxyl ion implantation does not affect the morphological microstructures of the graphene, as shown in Fig. 2, which means that the COOH+ ions mainly exist on the surfaces of COOH+/graphene. This illustrates that some COOH+ ions are affixed to graphene’s surfaces through electrostatic adsorption during the ion implantation process. One can see that the morphology of COOH functionalized graphene was completely changed after chemical functionalization. The graphene layers throughout oxidization process can be clearly identified as ‘building blocks’ and obvious aggregation, as shown in SEM and TEM images (Fig. 2G–I). It means the COOH functional groups are bonded to carbon atom of graphene via the chemical method.
According to the cytocompatibility study (Figs 5 and 6), COOH+/graphene shows the best cell adhesion and growth among three materials because COOH+/graphene surface holds more oxygen-containing functional groups compared with graphene, which is verified by FTIR, Raman and XPS analyses (Figs 3 and 4). And the oxygen-containing functional groups can make a significant contribution to improve the cell compatibility of materials. In vitro cytocompatibility study, the proliferation of L-929 cells on both COOH+/graphene and COOH functionalized graphene is enhanced compared with graphene after 5 days, as shown in Fig. 5. And it can be observed that the L-929 cells cultured on modified graphene showed higher density than that of graphene. SEM observation also showed that some L-929 cells adhered on graphene were nearly detached from the culture plates, and displayed morphological changes after 48 h, as shown in Fig. 6A,B. As a result, oxygen containing functional groups in COOH+/graphene and COOH functionalized graphene play an important impact on the biocompatibility.
In addition, compared with COOH functionalized graphene, the COOH+/graphene exhibits better performance in cytocompatibility. That is because the abundance of COOH+ ions existed on the surface of samples, which plays the important impact on the biocompatibility. The introduction of COOH+ ions does improve the hydrophilic property of graphene, moreover, it is conducive to negative charged cells adhesion, proliferation and viability. Besides, COOH+ ions are combined with the plasma proteins, which are belonging to the term of cell adhesion, by hydrogen bonds. This further enforces the attachment of cell on COOH+/graphene. Indeed, COOH+/graphene exhibited the highest cell-adhesion strength, cell viability, cell proliferation and cell stretching in MTT assay and SEM observation. The existence of COOH+ on the surface of graphene is the main reason to enhance cytocompatibility because the ion implantation technology could get more functional groups on the material surface than chemical functionalization.
With the increase of the implanted dosage of COOH+ ions, COOH+/graphene shows better hydrophobic by contact angle testing (Fig. 4D), which is beneficial to cell compatibility and growth. Therefore, the study demonstrated the good adhesion of COOH+/graphene with 1 × 1018 ions/cm2.
Both COOH functionalized graphene and COOH+/graphene were successfully obtained by chemical functionalization and physical ion implantation, respectively. The results showed that carboxyl ion implantation did not affect the morphological microstructures of the graphene. More importantly, COOH+/graphene exhibited higher cell-adhesion strength, cell viability, cell proliferation and cell stretching. No obvious toxicity was observed on COOH functionalized graphene and COOH+/graphene. The existence of O-containing functional groups on the surface of samples might be the main reason of enhanced cytocompatibility. Ion implantation technology could get more functional groups on the material surface than chemical functionalization. Therefore, this study demonstrated the best cytocompatibility of COOH+/graphene with 1 × 1018 ions/cm2 as promising and effective biomedical material for biomaterial application.
Synthesis of graphene, COOH+/graphene and COOH functionalized graphene
Graphene was prepared from natural graphite via modified Hummers’ method, as we previously reported32. Then it was first dispersed in 1-Methy-2-Pyrrolidinone (NMP) solution by ultrasonication for 6 h1. The suspension was then sprayed on clean cycloidal polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) substrate as a graphene support, followed by heating at 250 °C in a quartz tube at Ar atmosphere for 3 h to completely evaporate residual NMP33. The substrate coated with graphene (0.5 mg/cm2) was then removed from the tube center before being cooled from 250 °C to room temperature.
A Kaufmann-100 implanter was performed to obtain COOH+/graphene. The COOH+ was obtained from formic acid which was heated and evaporated into ion source34. The obtained COOH+ ions were accelerated at a high voltage onto the graphene samples located at the vacuum chamber. The implantation was done at accelerating power of 30 KeV, the beam current density of 119 μA/cm2, and the pressure of 1.5 × 10−2 Pa. The COOH+/graphene with three doses, 1 × 1017 ions/cm2, 5 × 1017 ions/cm2, and 1 × 1018 ions/cm2, were produced by adjusting the treatment time. The detail process of sample preparation can be found in our previous work35.
For comparison, graphene was also functionalized via a chemical method. In the first step, the as-prepared graphene was added into liquid mixture (3% conc. nitric acid + 3% conc. sulfuric acid + 79% water), and heated at 120 °C for 12 h. Then, the sample was repeatedly washed with distilled water and centrifuged to remove traces of acid. Finally, the graphene was functionalized with -COOH groups.
SEM, TEM, XPS, Contact angle analyses
The morphologies of graphene, COOH+/graphene and COOH functionalized graphene were observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Hitachi SU 8010) and high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM, JEOL JEM-2100). The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, MAGNA-560) was employed to characterize the surface functional groups of samples. Raman spectroscopy (Renishaw Invia Plus laser Raman spectrometer, Renishaw) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Kratos Axis Ultra Al) were used to identify the functional groups on the surface of materials. The water contact angles (CA) of samples were recorded using the CAM KSV021733 optical contact-angle inclinometer (Nunc, Finland).
Cell viability and morphology
Cytocompatibility is an essential requirement for nanomaterials to be employed in biological systems, which was recommended by the International Standard Organization (ISO) as biocompatibility test model in vitro1,36. Mouse fibroblast cell (L-929) is considered to be an idea model cell line to study cell biocompatibility37, which is commonly used to evaluate cytotoxicity of potential substrates for cell growth10,11. In order to investigate the cytocompatibility of graphene, COOH+/graphene, and COOH functionalized graphene in vitro, L-929 cell line was chosen as the target cells to evaluate the cell viability and proliferation by [3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] (MTT) assay1,33. The cells were cultured in a humidified 5% CO2/95% air incubator at 37 °C where the medium was replaced every 2 days. The cell culture medium (Roswell Park Memorial Institute-1640) was supplemented with 10% of fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) and 100 units/ml streptomycin/penicillin12. The samples were sterilized and placed in 96-well cell culture plates. After an incubation period of 48 h, the cells (the inoculum density of L929 cells were 1 × 104 cells/ml) were seeded onto each sample and allowed to culture from day 1 to day 8 at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator29,38. Except from experiment group, the contents in the remaining group were added into medium without samples taken as the blank (control group)9,12,29,36. The samples were incubated with cells in 96-well cell culture plates. After incubation for 24, 48, 96, 144 and 192 h, cells were added with a total of 20 μL MTT solution (M5655, Sigma, 5 mg/mL in PBS solution) and incubated for 3 h. 150 μL dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to each sample and incubated for an additional 0.5 h at 37 °C1,9. After incubation, culture supernatants were aspirated, and purple insoluble MTT product formazan was dissolved in DMSO solution1. The absorbency which could reflect the survival rate of cells was measured using the Biotek ELx808 plate reader at 490 nm according to the MTT assay26. The blank absorbance (medium without cells) was subtracted from each value. All the experiments were conducted in triplicate12. Cell morphology and stretching on graphene, COOH+/graphene, and functionalized graphene were observed under the scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI QUANTA 200) at 48 h post exposure9.
How to cite this article: Zhao, M.-l. et al. Enhancement of interaction of L-929 cells with functionalized graphene via COOH+ ion implantation vs. chemical method. Sci. Rep. 6, 37112; doi: 10.1038/srep37112 (2016).
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Fan, H. et al. Fabrication, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility of graphene-reinforced chitosan composites. Biomacromolecules 11, 2345–2351 (2010).
Mallakpour, S., Abdolmaleki, A. & Borandeh, S. Covalently functionalized graphene sheets with biocompatible natural amino acids. Applied Surface Science 307, 533–542 (2014).
Wang, Y., Li, Z., Wang, J., Li, J. & Lin, Y. Graphene and graphene oxide: biofunctionalization and applications in biotechnology. Trends in Biotechnology 29, 205–212 (2011).
Song, Q. et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of three-dimensional graphene foams cultured with microglial cells. Biomaterials 35, 6930–6940 (2014).
Novoselov, K. S. et al. A roadmap for graphene. Nature 490, 192–200 (2012).
Wang, Y., Li, Y., Tang, L., Lu, J. & Li, J. Application of graphene-modified electrode for selective detection of dopamine. Electrochemistry Communications 11, 889–892 (2009).
Zhan, L., Zhang, Y., Zeng, Q. L., Liu, Z. D. & Huang, C. Z. Facile one-pot synthesis of folic acid-modified graphene to improve the performance of graphene-based sensing strategy. J Colloid Interface Sci. 426, 293–299 (2014).
Qin, W., Li, X., Bian, W. W., Fan, X. J. & Qi, J. Y. Density functional theory calculations and molecular dynamics simulations of the adsorption of biomolecules on graphene surfaces. Biomaterials 31, 1007–1016 (2010).
Chang, Y. et al. In vitro toxicity evaluation of graphene oxide on A549 cells. Toxicol. Lett. 200, 201–210 (2011).
Talukdar, Y., Rashkow, J. T., Lalwani, G., Kanakia, S. & Sitharaman, B. The effects of graphene nanostructures on mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 35, 4863–4877 (2014).
Chen, H., Müller, M. B., Gilmore, K. J., Wallace, G. G. & Li, D. Mechanically strong, electrically conductive, and biocompatible graphene paper. Advanced Materials 20, 3557–3561 (2008).
Wojtoniszak, M. et al. Synthesis, dispersion, and cytocompatibility of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 89, 79–85 (2012).
Chen, G. Y., Pang, D. W., Hwang, S. M., Tuan, H. Y. & Hu, Y. C. A graphene-based platform for induced pluripotent stem cells culture and differentiation. Biomaterials 33, 418–427 (2012).
Gan, T. & Hu, S. Electrochemical sensors based on graphene materials. Microchimica Acta 175, 1–19 (2011).
Wang, H., Ji, J., Zhang, W., Fan, X. J. & Qi, J. Y. Biocompatibility and bioactivity of plasma-treated biodegradable poly(butylene succinate). Acta Biomaterialia 5, 279–287 (2009).
Ehlert, N. et al. Amino-modified silica surfaces efficiently immobilize bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) for medical purposes. Acta Biomaterialia 7, 1772–1779 (2011).
Wang, B. et al. Regulating the physical and biological performances of poly(p-dioxanone) by copolymerization with L-phenylalanine. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 130, 2311–2319 (2013).
Zhang, Y. T., Li, M. S., Zhao, M. L. & Li, D. J. Influence of polar functional groups introduced by COOH+ implantation on cell growth and anticoagulation of MWCNTs. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 1, 5543 (2013).
Wang, H., Maiyalagan, T. & Wang, X. Review on recent progress in nitrogen-doped graphene: synthesis, characterization, and its potential applications. ACS Catalysis 2, 781–794 (2012).
Li, D. J., Cui, F. Z. & Gu, H. Q. F+ ion implantation induced cell attachment on intraocular lens. Biomaterials 20, 1889–1896 (1999).
Li, S., Cao, W., Xia, J., Hu, J. & Li, Q. COOH+ ion implantation-modified indium tin oxide electrode for the direct electrochemistry of cytochrome c. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 268, 2235–2240 (2010).
Geng, D. et al. Nitrogen doping effects on the structure of graphene. Applied Surface Science 257, 9193–9198 (2011).
Singh, S. K. et al. Amine-modified graphene: Thrombo-protective safer alternative to graphene oxide for biomedical applications. ACS Nano 6, 2731–2740 (2012).
Diba, M., Fam, D. W. H., Boccaccini, A. R. & Milo, S. P. S. Electrophoretic deposition of graphene-related materials: A review of the fundamentals. Progress in Materials Science 82, 83–117 (2016).
Wang, K. et al. Biocompatibility of graphene oxide. Nanoscale Research Letters 6, 1 (2011).
Li, N. et al. The promotion of neurite sprouting and outgrowth of mouse hippocampal cells in culture by graphene substrates. Biomaterials 32, 9374–9382 (2011).
Ferrari, A. C. & Robertson, J. Raman spectroscopy in carbons: From nanotubes to diamond 1–16 (The Royal Society, 2004).
Tang, G. G. et al. Novel 3D flowerlike BiOCl0.7Br0.3, microspheres coupled with graphene sheets with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity for the degradation of rhodamine B. Ceramics International 42, 5607–5616 (2015).
Ju, K. J. et al. Bio-directed one-pot synthesis of Pt-Pd alloyed nanoflowers supported on reduced graphene oxide with enhanced catalytic activity for ethylene glycol oxidation. Electrochimica Acta 188, 696–703 (2015).
Wang, Y., Shao, Y., Matson, D. W., Li, J. & Lin, Y. Nitrogen-doped graphene and its application in electrochemical biosensing. ACS Nano 4, 1790–1798 (2010).
Jung, H., Park, K. T., Gueye, M. N., So, S. H. & Park, C. R. Bio-inspired graphene foam decorated with Pt nanoparticles for hydrogen storage at room temperature. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 41, 5019–5027 (2016).
Li, X. et al. Structurally tailored graphene nanosheets as lithium ion battery anodes: an insight to yield exceptionally high lithium storage performance. Nanoscale 5, 12607–12615 (2013).
Kalbacova, M., Broz, A., Kong, J. & Kalbac, M. Graphene substrates promote adherence of human osteoblasts and mesenchymal stromal cells. Carbon 48, 4323–4329 (2010).
Chen, T. et al. High throughput exfoliation of graphene oxide from expanded graphite with assistance of strong oxidant in modified Hummers method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 188, 012051 (2009).
Zhao, M. L. et al. Effect of nitrogen atomic percentage on N+-bombarded MWCNTs in cytocompatibility and hemocompatibility. Nanoscale Research Letters 9, 1–9 (2014).
Waiwijit, U. et al. Cytotoxicity assessment of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells on screen-printed graphene-carbon paste substrate. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 113, 190–197 (2014).
Cao, W., Hu, J., Li, Q. & Fang, W. A novel NH2/ITO ion implantation electrode: Preparation, characterization, and application in bioelectrochemistry. Electroanalysis 21, 723–729 (2009).
Zhang, Y. et al. Cytotoxicity effects of graphene and single-wall carbon nanotubes in neural phaeochromocytoma-derived PC12 cells. ACS Nano 4, 3181–3186 (2010).
This work was supported by High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, No. 2015AA034702), National Natural Science Foundation of China (51272176).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, M., Liu, X., Cao, Y. et al. Enhancement of interaction of L-929 cells with functionalized graphene via COOH+ ion implantation vs. chemical method. Sci Rep 6, 37112 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37112
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C (2018)