Article | Open | Published:

Continuous, One-pot Synthesis and Post-Synthetic Modification of NanoMOFs Using Droplet Nanoreactors

Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 36657 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs); also known as porous coordination polymers (PCP) are a class of porous crystalline materials constructed by connecting metal clusters via organic linkers. The possibility of functionalization leads to virtually infinite MOF designs using generic modular methods. Functionalized MOFs can exhibit interesting physical and chemical properties including accelerated adsorption kinetics and catalysis. Although there are discrete methods to synthesize well-defined nanoscale MOFs, rapid and flexible methods are not available for continuous, one-pot synthesis and post-synthetic modification (functionalization) of MOFs. Here, we show a continuous, scalable nanodroplet-based microfluidic route that not only facilitates the synthesis of MOFs at a nanoscale, but also offers flexibility for direct functionalization with desired functional groups (e.g., -COCH3, fluorescein isothiocyanate; FITC). In addition, the presented route of continuous manufacturing of functionalized nanosized MOFs takes significantly less time compared to state-of-the-art batch methods currently available (1 hr vs. several days). We envisage our approach to be a breakthrough method for synthesizing complex functionalized nanomaterials (metal, metal oxides, quantum dots and MOFs) that are not accessible by direct batch processing and expand the range of a new class of functionalized MOF-based functional nanomaterials.

Introduction

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) or porous coordination polymers (PCPs) are hybrid porous materials that consist of organic connecting ligands and metal ion-containing nodes or secondary building units (SBUs)1,2,3. In energy applications, MOFs are popular for their structural diversity, tunable pore size, extremely high surface area and hence high adsorption capacities for gas storage and separation, especially CO2, H2 and CH44,5,6,7. Owing to the structural tailorability of organic ligands and the ability to control their assembly with multitopic ligands at the nanoscale, MOFs possess extreme diversity. MOFs and their functionalized analogs often have interesting applications in catalysis8, energy storage9,10, adsorption11, efficient contrast agents12, nanofluids13,14,15, gas separation16,17, chemical sensing16,18,19, photoluminescence20, light harvesting21, biotechnology22, and drug delivery23. The pure structural form of a MOF, i.e., without any functional groups, may be limited in terms of applications. As such, post-synthetic modification (PSM) is carried out to extend the potential application range of MOFs, by attaching various functional groups to the frameworks. Simply, PSM is a systematic surface functionalization method for the introduction of functional groups in MOFs24. If the appropriate functional groups are implanted properly, PSM could also lead to materials that exhibit improved physical and chemical properties24. This modification also helps to regulate the overall performance (e.g., colloidal stability at different conditions, self- assembly) and to control its interaction with its environment (e.g., target specific accumulation etc.). Additional advantages of surface functionalization include: (i) preventing aggregation of nanoparticles, (ii) phase transfer; transfer nanoparticles from one solvent (e.g.; organic solvent) to other solvent (e.g.; water), (iii) functionalization with biomolecules enables nanoparticles to interact with specific biomolecules of interest, such as DNA, in biological systems for imaging, delivery and therapeutic use, and (iv) functionalization with fluorescent dyes enables fluorescence labeling of nanoparticles for bio-sensing applications25.

To meet the global demand of these interesting classes of MOFs, there is a pressing need for novel synthesis strategies for producing large number of new functionalized nanoparticles and as well large-scale production and development of functionalized nanoparticles with good control over size and morphology. The critical challenge is to control the composition and as well the arrangement of atoms in the nanoparticle system with tunable on production rates. Currently, traditional laboratory approaches such as solvothermal, hydrothermal and microwave methods are used for their synthesis, which suffer from extended reaction times and low quality materials. To control MOF growth and its surfaces at the nanoscale, various surface capping polymers26 such as polydadmac15 or polyvinylpyrrolidone; PVP have been routinely used13,14,15,27. Modulators such as monodentate ligand, which are similar to an organic linker, are also routinely used for modulating MOF growth. However, precise control over size, shape and reduced batch-to-batch variation has led to increasing interest in continuous flow synthesis methods28,29,30,31,32. Additionally, while PSM is the preferred method for successful functionalization of MOFs, current approaches are extremely time, energy and cost intensive.

In the past decade, a number of methods have been demonstrated for the facile synthesis and PSM of MOFs33,34,35. In direct self-assembly route (Fig. 1, DR), introduction of functional groups onto the ligand could complicate or prevent MOF synthesis due to issues such as steric hindrance, insolubility, thermal instability and competition for SBU coordination35,36. For functionalized modified ligands, existing reaction condition of the original ligand may not work, making new functionalized MOF synthesis an open-ended synthesis problem24,37. In addition, the reaction between functional group and SBUs may produce undesired products37. For example, the reaction of ZrCl4 and 2-acetylamidobenzenedicarboxylic acid (CH3CONH−H2BDC) in DMF did not produce relevant functionalized MOF product, UIO-66−NHCOCH3, instead an amorphous gel was formed33,38. Therefore PSM (Fig. 1, PSMR) is currently achieved using a process that includes several steps: (a) synthesis of MOFs, (b) removal of starting materials and solvents from the pores retained during synthesis; solvent exchange, (c) drying of MOFs, and (d) functionalization with target functional group. The total time required for these four steps could range from days to few weeks24. Moreover, during the MOF synthesis, nucleation takes place at the reaction surface and different nucleation mechanisms arise with the use of large reaction vessel resulting in low quality materials, therefore the size of the reaction vessel becomes a crucial parameter39. In addition, the nucleation and growth of colloidal nanoparticles are sensitive to experimental conditions (temperature and concentration), therefore large scale production of nanoMOFs (colloidal sized MOF) with controlled morphology is nearly impossible by simply linearly increasing the volume of the reaction solution in batch synthesis methods.

Figure 1: MOF synthesis and post-synthetic modifications via different routes.
Figure 1

Direct comparison of our microfluidic nanodroplet route with conventional direct and post-synthetic modification of UIO-66-NH2.

Currently, conventional and some novel synthetic methods40,41 yield gram-scale quantities of high quality and defect-free MOFs with uniform size distributions. However, precise control over size and shape and reduced batch-to-batch variation has led to increasing interest in microfluidic synthesis methods28,29,30,31,32. The automated control, integration, and the potential of in-line quality monitoring are a few of the advantages of microfluidic methods, both continuous phase and droplet based, compared to conventional batch methods31. Continuous phase systems are easy to operate but face two drawbacks31,39,42,43. First, the tubes in continuous phase may irreversibly foul after extended operation due to direct contact of solvent and starting materials, in addition to MOFs adhering to the inner walls. Second, the viscous drag at the channel walls creates parabolic velocity profile across the tube that causes variation in residence times, which can affect size and property, composition variation of MOFs. The droplet-based systems which are getting increasingly popular for MOF synthesis have overcome the above-mentioned drawbacks and are applied to a wide range of MOFs29,30,31,39,44,45,46.

Here, we report a continuous, scalable nanodroplet-based microfluidic route that not only facilitate the synthesis of MOFs at a nanoscale, but also offers the flexibility to directly functionalize them with desired functional groups (e.g., -COCH3 and FITC). Our microfluidic continuous route delineated in Fig. 1 combines the above-mentioned four steps required for PSM (Fig. 1-PSMR) into a single step, therefore pushing the field of combined MOF synthesis and its PSM towards industrial setting.

Preparation of the nanoMOFs and their functionalized analogs

To address the challenges of conventional synthesis methods, various droplet-based microfluidic devices have been presented during the past few years29,30,31,39,44,45,46. These devices offer a number of advantages over conventional batch type reactors. The reduction in droplet volume enables rapid reactions due to extremely small heat capacity and shorter diffusion distances. The ability to conduct a large number of parallel reactions with droplets is another advantage in addition to confinement of reagents with distinct reaction conditions, and isolation of droplets to avoid nonspecific binding of reagents to the channel walls47. However, all the existing devices only emphasize on fast and high throughput synthesis of MOFs by using only metal and ligand reagents. Currently reported synthesis methods also seriously suffer from control of size (~200–500 nm) of MOFs due to absence of modulator. The droplet-based microfluidic technique we developed can be exploited as a generic, low-cost, fast, and scalable method for the one-pot synthesis and PSM of MOFs. Our droplet chip works on the principle of flow focusing geometry (Fig. 2c). The device is fabricated using polydimethylsiloxane(PDMS) material and soft lithography technique48. The microfluidic chip consists of four ports used for feeding oil (O), metal salt (MS), organic ligand (OL) and modulator (M).

Figure 2: Microfluidic chip for nanoMOF synthesis and post-synthetic modification.
Figure 2

(a) Droplet based nanoreactors formation using PDMS based microfluidic chip; (b) Automated experimental setup to drive microfluidic chip for synthesis and functionalization of nano-sized MOFs and (c) Design of microfluidic chip that shows ports and important parts of the chip, flow-focusing junction and winding channel mixer. The chip consists of four ports, feeding oil (O) port, metal salt (MS), organic ligand (OL) and modulator (M) ports and one exit port to transport mixed droplet nanoreactors to a residence tube for subsequent MOF synthesis and PSM inside these nanoreactors.

To demonstrate the combined nanoMOF synthesis and PSM, we chose to work with UIO-66-NH2 nanoMOF, because the UIO-66-NH2 MOF by itself has exceptionally high thermal and chemical stability and offers us an opportunity (due to the presence of amino groups) to incorporate the active functional groups in subsequent PSM reactions49,50. The continuous MOF synthesis and PSM is achieved in two steps. First, the reagents (MS, OL, M) are injected into oil phase (O) at controlled flow velocities in order to form MOF premixture droplets at the flow-focusing junction where three flows merge. The droplets continue to flow through a winding channel to enhance mixing of reagents. Second, the MOF premixture droplets continue to flow outside the chip through the attached tubing (Fig. 2a, Video-SMV1). The droplets inside the residence tube were allowed to pass through a heating oven (Fig. 2b) kept at 120 °C in order to initiate the nucleation and crystallization of MOFs inside the droplets. The formed MOFs are collected inside the bottle (Video-SMV2) In addition, this method allows us to do real-time monitoring of droplets, which is not achievable in other methods31. For real-time online observation, the droplets should be generated in a transparent reactor system or semi-transparent, fabricated from PDMS or polytetrafluoroethylene; PTFE materials, microfluidic systems. In our PDMS chip, we can easily observe the generation and motion of droplets, including mixing of a metal salt solution, organic ligand and modulator reagents, with the naked eye and with the aid of microscope camera. These systems can be microfabricated with a range of materials including PDMS, glass, silicon, stainless steel, ceramics and plastics. However most of the previous systems for MOF synthesis have used assembly of simple tubing’s. The method we developed is highly automated that runs using PDMS based microfluidic chips that in turn are driven by computer controlled and programmable pressure source (Figure S2). Moreover, our method can be scalable by putting multiple microfluidic chips in parallel, like semiconductor processors. PDMS is used for the fabrication of our microfluidic device since multiple chips can be rapidly fabricated by simply curing a premixed PDMS liquid on pre-fabricated silicon master mold. Therefore, the scalability of our approach can be increased by 10 to 20 times using more chips by considering the demand of the production rate in-situ. Scalability here refers to the scalability of direct synthesis of functionalized nanosized MOFs (Table 1). Using one microfluidic chip, we can directly synthesize functionalized colloidal nanoMOFs at the flow rate of 5 mL/hour and production rate of 5 mg/hour. The estimated STY production rate is in the range of 0.5 to 1 kg m−3 day−1 compared to ~1 and 5.8 kg m−3 day−1 in the small-scale laboratory and microfluidic syntheses as provided in the literature30,51. Please note that there is no known method for the continuous in-situ synthesis and functionalization of colloidal nano sized MOFs. The method presented in this manuscript could be first chip-based platform for the synthesis of MOFs and their functionalized analogs. The production rate at which we produced functionalized MOFs directly in a single step has not been shown by either conventional batch process or by microfluidic-based MOF synthesis until date.

Table 1: Comparison of microfluidic and batch method for combined MOF synthesis and its PSM.

Characterization of functionalized nanoMOFs

To characterize the crystal structure of as synthesized and functionalized UIO-66-NH2 analogs, approximately 5 mg each of UIO-66-NH2 and its functionalized analogs synthesized through both batch and microfluidic methods was characterized with powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). The PXRD patterns of the intrinsic UIO-66-NH2 and functionalized analog are presented in Fig. 3a for comparison. PXRD results of both UIO-66-NH2 and functionalized UIO-66-NH-COCH3 have a prominent peak at 2θ angles of 7.3° and other characteristic peaks at 2θ of 8.4°, 25.7°, and 30.6°. Some broadening of the peaks may be due to the nanocrystallinity of batch intrinsic UIO-66-NH2 samples. The PXRD patterns of as synthesized and as well functionalized analogs matches. Therefore functionalization of UIO-66-NH2 with acetate groups takes place without losing parent UIO-66-NH2 crystallinity in a single step. Our observations are in line with the observations made by Garibay et al.52, who studied the post-synthetic modification of UIO-66-NH2 scaffold and concluded that UIO-66-NH2 serve as a tunable microporous scaffold. They also studied the effect of functionalization on the BET surface area. Fig. 3c illustrates the high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of batch intrinsic and functionalized UIO-66-NH2 analog samples synthesized using our microfluidic nanoreactors droplet chip. These SEM images indicate the small differences in shape, size and surface morphology of intrinsic and functionalized UIO-66-NH2 analog particles. The intrinsic UIO-66-NH2 sample has irregular shaped particles in the range of 80–100 nm in diameter (Fig. 3c(i)). When UIO-66-NH2 is functionalized with COCH3, the SEM image (Fig. 3c(ii)) displays nearly spherical particles in the size range of ~100–150 nm. Interestingly, the size and shape of FITC functionalized UIO-66-NH2 analog particles changed significantly. Figure 3c (iii) shows smaller particles (20–30 nm in diameter) with increased irregularity in shape for the UIO-66-NH-FITC sample. It is worth noting that the magnification factor of the SEM image of UIO-66-NH-FITC is different from the other images due to smaller particle size. The SEM images clearly indicate that the shape and size of UIO-66-NH2 particles changed after functionalization. It is possible that once the UIO-66-NH2 surface is functionalized with FITC it appears to influence MOF growth. It is also possible that filling of the UIO-66-NH-COCH3 and UIO-66-NH-FITC pores with polar-solvent molecules (methanol) could also lead to structure breathing, modifying the linker–linker distance49 and therefore, producing changes in the size of the parent UIO-66-NH2 MOF from ~100 nm to ~20–30 nm. However, further study of this interesting phenomenon is beyond the scope of this paper.

Figure 3: Characterization of nanoMOFs.
Figure 3

(a) Comparison of PXRD patterns of UIO-66-NH2 and its amino analog synthesized through microfluidic device and batch method; (b) Nitrogen adsorption isotherms of UIO-66-NH2 MOF synthesized using microfluidic system; (c) SEM images of (i) UIO-66-NH2 (ii) UIO-66-NH-COCH3 and (iii) UIO-66-NH-FITC MOFs synthesized from the microfluidic system.

Approximately 10 mg powder of UIO-66-NH2 was evacuated under vacuum overnight and used for Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) measurements. Nitrogen adsorption isotherms were obtained at 77 K using a multiport volumetric apparatus (Fig. 3b). The BET surface area of our nano UIO-66-NH2 is 910 m2/g, which compares well with the reported maximum value of 1123 m2/g34. The detailed area-volume-pore volume summary of UIO-66-NH2 is provided in Figure S1. The functionalization reaction between acetic acid and UIO-66-NH2 MOF was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). An FT-IR spectrum was recorded on the sample used for PXRD measurements without any treatment except for evacuating under vacuum for overnight. The summary of FT-IR characteristics wavelengths of post synthetically modified UIO-66-NH-COCH3 from conventional batch synthesis33 and present nanodroplet-based microfluidic system is provided in Table 2. These wavelengths were also successfully compared with typical wavelength range of characteristics vibrations in the UIO-66-NH-COCH3 MOF. The data presented in the Table 2 is a clear evidence of formation of functionalized UIO-66-NH-COCH3 MOF using nano-droplet based microfluidic approach. The FTIR spectrum show many skeletal modes for both parent UIO-66 and functionalized UIO-66-NH-COCH3 in the region below 1600 cm−1 due to vibrations of the organic aromatic ligands (Fig. 4)33,53. The region below 1600 cm−1 is also dominated by key peaks introduced by amino functional group due to post-synthetic modification. More precisely, the UIO-66-NH-COCH3 show a strong peak (indicated by small green triangle) at 1652 cm−1 in the spectra, a good indication for the presence of the amide ν(C=O) from functional group NHCOCH3 (Fig. 4)33. As evidence for post-synthetic modification, we also observed erosion of the νsy(NH2) and νasym(NH2) peaks, at 3495 cm−1 and 3380 cm−1 respectively. These bands characterize the asymmetrical and symmetrical N–H stretching modes54. In addition, corresponding emergence of a new ν(N–H) peak, at 3322 cm−1 was also observed as a single weak shoulder peak (indicated by small orange triangle)33,54,55,56 i.e. on low-frequency side of the N–H stretching band from overtone of the N–H bending band intensified by Fermi resonance. Such weak shoulder peaks are quite common in PSM literature and they indicate slow progress of PSM33. The presence of such peaks also might be coming from the presence of small amount of UIO-66-NH2 intermediate formed before the formation of final functionalized analog. Two other strong peaks related to ν(Car-N) are also observed at 1259 and 1340 cm−133. The formation of strong peaks at 1257, 1652 and 1340 cm−1 clearly indicate progress of post-synthetic modification, however the modification of NH2 to NH-COCH3 was incomplete after 1 hour of reaction indicating that the longer reaction time might be needed to achieve quantitative modification.

Table 2: Comparison of main FTIR characteristic frequencies of post synthetically modified UIO-66-NH-COCH3 using present nanodroplet-based microfluidic system and conventional batch PSM.
Figure 4: Amino functionalized nanoMOFs.
Figure 4

The FT-IR spectrum showing three prominent parts– skeletal peaks related to MOF, CO peaks, NH and NH2 peaks of UIO-66- and UIO-66-NHCOCH3.

Figure 5a illustrate the in-situ synthesis and functionalization of FITC onto UIO-66-NH2. To investigate the fluorescent behavior of FITC tagged to UiO-66-NH2, we excited the suspension of FITC-conjugated analog in methanol at the excitation wavelength of 485 nm and collected the emission spectra band-centered at 530 nm (Fig. 5b). Interestingly, we observed the blue shifted peak at 505 nm57,58 (green line) for FITC tagged UIO-66-NH2 MOF in comparison to expected parent FITC peak at 540 nm (black line). It is also confirmed that UIO-66-NH2 MOF has its own fluorescence peak (red line) but at significantly lower wavelength, 430 nm59 compared to 505 nm peak of FITC analog. The validity of our blue shift could be confirmed with similar kind of blue shift during the functionalization of FITC to F-UIO60 (blue shift to 516 nm) and to UIO-66-NH257 (blue shift to 516 nm). This shift in the emission spectra could be observed since for cleaning and emission measurement of UIO-66-NH-FITC, we used methanol that has higher polarity index compared to original DMF solvent49. Solvent change may not affect intensities significantly since monomer and excimer lifetimes do not show much change with the medium. Therefore, the reason for blue shift could be multifold and so is beyond the scope of this paper. At a higher synthesis and functionalization temperature (120 °C), there is also a potential chance for the formation of an analog formed by bonding FITC directly to amino group on organic linker (2-aminobenzenendicarboxylate, NH2-BDC). To validate that we synthesized the pure FITC functionalized MOF analog and not the BDC-NH-FITC analog, we heated the mixture of NH2-BDC and FITC under same experimental conditions as that we used in the synthesis of UIO-66-NH-FITC and scanned at same wavelength range for comparison. UIO-66-NH-FITC analog exhibited a peak at 505 nm, which is quite different from pure FITC and BDC-NH-FITC (blue line) that have emission spectra band-centered at 530 nm. Therefore, the detailed study of these fluorescence scans, as illustrated in Fig. 5, unambiguously confirm the formation of FITC functionalized UIO-66-NH2 analog.

Figure 5: FITC Functionalized nanoMOFs.
Figure 5

(a) Schematic illustration of FITC functionalization onto UIO-66-NH2. (b) Fluorescent emission spectra of FITC, FITC tagged to UIO-66-NH2 and FITC tagged to linker amino BDC.

Conclusion

In summary, we successfully showed the continuous and scalable nanodroplet-based microfluidic route as a viable platform for the synthesis of MOFs and their functionalized analogs. Confinement of the reactants in nanodroplet resulted in rapid increase in reaction rates, due to enhanced heat and mass transfer. Thus we obtained acetyl and FITC functionalized UIO-66-NH2 in a very short time (1 hr) vs compared to batch process (6–20 days). Our approach combines four steps currently used in PSM into single step, therefore pushing the field of combined MOF synthesis and its post synthetic modification towards industrial setting. Flexibility of microfluidic system, such as automated control, integration, and the potential of in-line quality monitoring make this approach unique and can be used to access MOF materials that cannot be synthesized otherwise. Although our approach offers a precise control on self-assembly and composition of MOFs at the nanoscale, there remains a challenge on the post synthesis processing such as cleaning and isolation of products and efforts are underway in our laboratory on in-situ synthesis and purification.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Jambovane, S. R. et al. Continuous, One-pot Synthesis and Post-Synthetic Modification of NanoMOFs Using Droplet Nanoreactors. Sci. Rep. 6, 36657; doi: 10.1038/srep36657 (2016).

References

  1. 1.

    Hybrid porous solids: past, present, future. Chem Soc Rev 37, 191–214 (2008).

  2. 2.

    , & Functional porous coordination polymers. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 43, 2334–2375 (2004).

  3. 3.

    et al. Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials. Nature 423, 705–714 (2003).

  4. 4.

    & Strategies for hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 44, 4670–4679 (2005).

  5. 5.

    , & Metal–organic frameworks for separations. Chemical reviews 112, 869–932 (2011).

  6. 6.

    , & Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal–organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 38, 1477–1504 (2009).

  7. 7.

    et al. Design, synthesis, structure, and gas (N2, Ar, CO2, CH4, and H2) sorption properties of porous metal-organic tetrahedral and heterocuboidal polyhedra. Journal of the American Chemical Society 127, 7110–7118, doi: 10.1021/ja042802q (2005).

  8. 8.

    et al. Metal–organic framework materials as catalysts. Chem Soc Rev 38, 1450–1459 (2009).

  9. 9.

    et al. In Situ One-Step Synthesis of Hierarchical Nitrogen-Doped Porous Carbon for High-Performance Supercapacitors. Acs Appl Mater Inter 6, 7214–7222, doi: 10.1021/am500339x (2014).

  10. 10.

    et al. Metal-organic frameworks for energy storage: Batteries and supercapacitors. Coordin Chem Rev 307, 361–381, doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.09.002 (2016).

  11. 11.

    , & Independent verification of the saturation hydrogen uptake in MOF-177 and establishment of a benchmark for hydrogen adsorption in metal–organic frameworks. Journal of Materials Chemistry 17, 3197–3204 (2007).

  12. 12.

    , , , & Nanoscale Metal−Organic Frameworks as Potential Multimodal Contrast Enhancing Agents. Journal of the American Chemical Society 128, 9024–9025, doi: 10.1021/ja0627444 (2006).

  13. 13.

    , , , & A Combined Experimental and Computational Study on the Stability of Nanofluids Containing Metal Organic Frameworks. J Phys Chem B 119, 8992–8999, doi: 10.1021/jp5079086 (2015).

  14. 14.

    et al. Metal-organic heat carrier nanofluids. Nano Energy 2, 845–855, doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.02.007 (2013).

  15. 15.

    et al. Adsorption Kinetics in Nanoscale Porous Coordination Polymers. Acs Appl Mater Inter 7, 21712–21716, doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b04109 (2015).

  16. 16.

    & Metal-organic framework thin films: from fundamentals to applications. Chemical reviews 112, 1055–1083, doi: 10.1021/cr200167v (2012).

  17. 17.

    et al. A High‐Performance Gas‐Separation Membrane Containing Submicrometer‐Sized Metal–Organic Framework Crystals. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 49, 9863–9866 (2010).

  18. 18.

    et al. Metal-organic framework materials as chemical sensors. Chemical reviews 112, 1105–1125, doi: 10.1021/cr200324t (2012).

  19. 19.

    & Metal− organic frameworks as sensors: a ZIF-8 based Fabry− Pérot device as a selective sensor for chemical vapors and gases. Journal of the American Chemical Society 132, 7832–7833 (2010).

  20. 20.

    , , , & Synthesis, characterization, and photoluminescence of isostructural Mn, Co, and Zn MOFs having a diamondoid structure with large tetrahedral cages and high thermal stability. Chem Commun 2663–2665 (2005).

  21. 21.

    et al. Light-harvesting metal–organic frameworks (MOFs): efficient strut-to-strut energy transfer in bodipy and porphyrin-based MOFs. Journal of the American Chemical Society 133, 15858–15861 (2011).

  22. 22.

    Modifying MOFs: new chemistry, new materials. Chemical Science 1, 32–36 (2010).

  23. 23.

    et al. Porous metal-organic-framework nanoscale carriers as a potential platform for drug delivery and imaging. Nat Mater 9, 172–178, doi: 10.1038/nmat2608 (2010).

  24. 24.

    Postsynthetic methods for the functionalization of metal-organic frameworks. Chemical reviews 112, 970–1000, doi: 10.1021/cr200179u (2011).

  25. 25.

    & Surface modification, functionalization and bioconjugation of colloidal inorganic nanoparticles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 368, 1333–1383 (2010).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Effect of Organic Polymer Additive on Crystallization of Porous Coordination Polymer. Chemistry of Materials 18, 992–995, doi: 10.1021/cm052427g (2006).

  27. 27.

    et al. Synthesis, characterization, and application of metal organic framework nanostructures. Langmuir 26, 18591–18594, doi: 10.1021/la103590t (2010).

  28. 28.

    et al. Accelerating the Controlled Synthesis of Metal–Organic Frameworks by a Microfluidic Approach: A Nanoliter Continuous Reactor. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 5, 9405–9410, doi: 10.1021/am4029872 (2013).

  29. 29.

    et al. Continuous and Scalable Production of Well-Controlled Noble-Metal Nanocrystals in Milliliter-Sized Droplet Reactors. Nano Letters 14, 6626–6631, doi: 10.1021/nl503284x (2014).

  30. 30.

    et al. Microfluidic approach toward continuous and ultrafast synthesis of metal-organic framework crystals and hetero structures in confined microdroplets. Journal of the American Chemical Society 135, 14619–14626, doi: 10.1021/ja4039642 (2013).

  31. 31.

    , , & Toward continuous and scalable production of colloidal nanocrystals by switching from batch to droplet reactors. Chem Soc Rev 44, 5806–5820, doi: 10.1039/C5CS00049A (2015).

  32. 32.

    et al. Versatile, High Quality and Scalable Continuous Flow Production of Metal-Organic Frameworks. Scientific Reports 4, 5443, doi: 10.1038/srep05443 (2014).

  33. 33.

    et al. Post-synthetic modification of the metal–organic framework compound UiO-66. Journal of Materials Chemistry 20, 9848–9851, doi: 10.1039/C0JM02416C (2010).

  34. 34.

    , , & Tuning the adsorption properties of UiO-66 via ligand functionalization. Langmuir: the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids 28, 15606–15613, doi: 10.1021/la3035352 (2012).

  35. 35.

    , & Fast and high yield post-synthetic modification of metal-organic frameworks by vapor diffusion. Chem Commun 48, 1904–1906, doi: 10.1039/c2cc17461h (2012).

  36. 36.

    , , & Postsynthetic modification: a versatile approach toward multifunctional metal-organic frameworks. Inorganic chemistry 48, 7341–7349, doi: 10.1021/ic900796n (2009).

  37. 37.

    et al. Potential applications of metal-organic frameworks. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 253, 3042–3066, doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.05.019 (2009).

  38. 38.

    et al. Beyond post-synthesis modification: evolution of metal-organic frameworks via building block replacement. Chem Soc Rev 43, 5896–5912 (2014).

  39. 39.

    & Scaling up the Production of Colloidal Nanocrystals: Should We Increase or Decrease the Reaction Volume? Advanced Materials 26, 2600–2606, doi: 10.1002/adma.201304897 (2014).

  40. 40.

    , , & Continuous-Flow Microwave Synthesis of Metal-Organic Frameworks: A Highly Efficient Method for Large-Scale Production. Chem-Eur J 22, 3245–3249, doi: 10.1002/chem.201505139 (2016).

  41. 41.

    , , & A spray-drying strategy for synthesis of nanoscale metal–organic frameworks and their assembly into hollow superstructures. Nat Chem 5, 203–211, doi: 10.1038/nchem.1569 (2013).

  42. 42.

    , , & Controlled multistep synthesis in a three-phase droplet reactor. Nature Communications 5, 3777, doi: 10.1038/ncomms4777 (2014).

  43. 43.

    & Segmented Flow Reactors for Nanocrystal Synthesis. Advanced Materials 25, 1813–1821, doi: 10.1002/adma.201203252 (2013).

  44. 44.

    , & Synthesis of metal-organic frameworks: A mini review. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 30, 1667–1680, doi: 10.1007/s11814-013-0140-6 (2013).

  45. 45.

    , , , & Nanocrystal synthesis in microfluidic reactors: where next? Lab on a chip 14, 3172–3180, doi: 10.1039/C4LC00429A (2014).

  46. 46.

    et al. Digital microfluidic high-throughput printing of single metal-organic framework crystals. Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) 24, 1316–1320, doi: 10.1002/adma.201104922 (2012).

  47. 47.

    , , , & Creation of Stepwise Concentration Gradient in Picoliter Droplets for Parallel Reactions of Matrix Metalloproteinase II and IX. Analytical Chemistry 83, 3358–3364, doi: 10.1021/ac103217p (2011).

  48. 48.

    & Soft lithography. Annual review of materials science 28, 153–184 (1998).

  49. 49.

    & Metal-Organic Frameworks for Photonics Applications. Vol. 157 (Springer, 2014).

  50. 50.

    et al. Synthesis and Stability of Tagged UiO-66 Zr-MOFs. Chem Mater 22, 6632–6640, doi: 10.1021/cm102601v (2010).

  51. 51.

    , , & In Metal-Organic Frameworks 337–352 (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2011).

  52. 52.

    & Isoreticular synthesis and modification of frameworks with the UiO-66 topology. Chem Commun 46, 7700–7702, doi: 10.1039/c0cc02990d (2010).

  53. 53.

    et al. A New Zirconium Inorganic Building Brick Forming Metal Organic Frameworks with Exceptional Stability. Journal of the American Chemical Society 130, 13850–13851, doi: 10.1021/ja8057953 (2008).

  54. 54.

    , , & Spectrometric identification of organic compounds. (John Wiley & Sons, 2014).

  55. 55.

    Instrumental methods of chemical analysis. (Krishna Prakashan Media, 2000).

  56. 56.

    Vibrational spectroscopy: theory and applications. (New Age International, 2007).

  57. 57.

    , , , & An amine-functionalized metal–organic framework as a sensing platform for DNA detection. Chem Commun 50, 12069–12072 (2014).

  58. 58.

    et al. Use of confocal fluorescence microscopy to compare different methods of modifying metal–organic framework (MOF) crystals with dyes. CrystEngComm 13, 2828–2832, doi: 10.1039/C0CE00416B (2011).

  59. 59.

    & A colloidal water-stable MOF as a broad-range fluorescent pH sensor via post-synthetic modification. Chem Commun 50, 4711–4713, doi: 10.1039/C4CC00659C (2014).

  60. 60.

    , & Nanoscale Metal–Organic Frameworks for Real-Time Intracellular pH Sensing in Live Cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society 136, 12253–12256, doi: 10.1021/ja507333c (2014).

  61. 61.

    Interpretation of infrared spectra, a practical approach. Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry (2000).

  62. 62.

    , , & The handbook of infrared and Raman characteristic frequencies of organic molecules. (Elsevier, 1991).

  63. 63.

    Infrared and Raman spectroscopy; principles and spectral interpretation. (Elsevier, 2011).

  64. 64.

    Infrared and Raman characteristic group frequencies: tables and charts. (John Wiley & Sons, 2004).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy’s Geothermal Technologies Program under Funding Opportunity Announcement DE-PS36-09GO99017 supported this work. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is a multi-program national laboratory operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. IR, Fluorescence and SEM characterizations were performed at EMSL, a national scientific user facility sponsored by the Department of Energy’s Office of Biological and Environmental Research, located at PNNL.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99354, United States

    • Sachin R. Jambovane
    • , Ryan T. Kelly
    • , Zheming Wang
    • , Manjula I. Nandasiri
    • , Shanta Katipamula
    •  & Cameron Trader
  2. Energy and Environment Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99354, United States

    • Satish K. Nune
    •  & B. Peter McGrail
  3. Fundamental Chemical Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99354, United States

    • Herbert T. Schaef

Authors

  1. Search for Sachin R. Jambovane in:

  2. Search for Satish K. Nune in:

  3. Search for Ryan T. Kelly in:

  4. Search for B. Peter McGrail in:

  5. Search for Zheming Wang in:

  6. Search for Manjula I. Nandasiri in:

  7. Search for Shanta Katipamula in:

  8. Search for Cameron Trader in:

  9. Search for Herbert T. Schaef in:

Contributions

S.K.N. and B.P.M. conceived the original research and S.K.N. directed its execution. S.R.J. and R.T.K. conceptualized and developed microfluidic approach used for this research. S.K.N. synthesized the nanomaterials by batch process and S.R.J. performed majority of the work and synthesized all materials using nanoliter-scale droplet reactors. Z.W. performed IR and fluorescence measurements. M.N. performed SEM measurements. S.K. and C.T. fabricated microfluidic chips. R.T.K. directed the chip fabrication. H.T.S. performed powder X-ray crystallography. S.K.N. and S.R.J. wrote the manuscript with the help of all co-authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satish K. Nune.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36657

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.