The omega loop in β-lactamases plays a pivotal role in substrate recognition and catalysis, and some mutations in this loop affect the adaptability of the enzymes to new antibiotics. Various mutations, including substitutions, deletions, and intragenic duplications resulting in tandem repeats (TRs), have been associated with β-lactamase substrate spectrum extension. TRs are unique among the mutations as they cause severe structural perturbations in the enzymes. We explored the process by which TRs are accommodated in order to test the adaptability of the omega loop. Structures of the mutant enzymes showed that the extra amino acid residues in the omega loop were freed outward from the enzyme, thereby maintaining the overall enzyme integrity. This structural adjustment was accompanied by disruptions of the internal α-helix and hydrogen bonds that originally maintained the conformation of the omega loop and the active site. Consequently, the mutant enzymes had a relaxed binding cavity, allowing for access of new substrates, which regrouped upon substrate binding in an induced-fit manner for subsequent hydrolytic reactions. Together, the data demonstrate that the design of the binding cavity, including the omega loop with its enormous adaptive capacity, is the foundation of the continuous evolution of β-lactamases against new drugs.
A major cause of global-scale antibiotic resistance is the hydrolytic inactivation of β-lactams, the most widely used group of antibiotics, by β-lactamases1. This problem prompted researchers to develop new antibiotic variants, such as the extended-spectrum cephalosporin. However, the effectiveness of these antibiotics was challenged by the emergence of the extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) that evolved under the selective pressure exerted by these antibiotics1,2,3.
The evolution of the ESBLs has been driven by various mutations, principally those targeting the residues constituting the active-site region3,4. In class A β-lactamases, a conserved structural element called the omega loop5 constitutes a wall at the active site that shapes the binding cavity6,7,8,9. This is a prominent site for mutations to occur, resulting in substrate spectrum extension2,4,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. Most mutations identified in the omega loops of ESBLs were point mutations that resulted in amino acid substitutions2,3,4,16. Structural alterations in the omega loop that resulted from amino acid-substitution mutations have been widely studied in association with substrate spectrum extension18,19. However, other types of mutations, including deletions20,21 and duplications resulting in tandem repeats (TRs)10,22, have also been identified. Due to their large sizes, TRs are expected to cause more severe perturbations in omega-loop structures than do amino acid-substitution mutations. Therefore, TRs provide a unique opportunity to explore the adaptive capacity of the omega loop against structural stresses and the resulting molecular consequences as they relate to substrate spectrum extension.
In this study, we demonstrate the extensive perturbation-absorbing capacity of the omega loop against TR mutations of various sizes, some of which are large enough to include the entire omega loop. Then, we describe the structural basis of the mechanism underlying the highly adaptive capacity of the omega loop, which leads to the evolution of β-lactamases that can hydrolyze new drugs by providing a flexible active site.
Results and Discussion
TR mutations in the omega loop-coding region in the penL gene
We obtained TR mutations of penL (penA in our previous reports4,10,20,21 is renamed penL here, following the nomenclature guidelines by Poirel et al.23), which codes for a class A β-lactamase, by exposing Burkholderia thailandensis strain E26424 to ceftazidime (3–5 μg/ml), a third-generation cephalosporin. PenL (NCBI reference sequence: YP_439646.1) is highly conserved in pathogenic Burkholderia species, including Burkholderia pseudomallei, Burkholderia mallei, and Burkholderia cenocepacia25. The antibiotic regimen used to treat infections by these Burkholderia pathogens generally includes ceftazidime26. PenL has been used as a model in exploring various evolutionary paths to substrate spectrum extension through amino acid substitutions, deletions, and duplications4,10,20,21.
The repeat units of the TR mutations that we obtained ranged from 6 to 168 bps in size, and three of them, TRs 12, 13, and 14, were large enough to include the region encoding the entire omega loop (Fig. 1A). Among the 23 TRs, 11 were previously described, particularly with respect to the DNA duplication mechanisms that caused the TRs10. Like most ESBLs19,27, all TR mutants exhibited significantly increased minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for ceftazidime but had decreased MICs for the original substrate, amoxicillin (Fig. 1B). We found a pattern, in which longer duplications generally conferred lower MICs for ceftazidime than did shorter ones. For example, TR14, which has the longest duplication, conferred the lowest MIC for ceftazidime (Fig. 1B). An exception to this pattern is TR4, which conferred a lower MIC than expected for its size (Fig. 1B,C). On the other hand, there were small duplications, TR5 and TR23, that conferred markedly higher MICs for their sizes; notably, TR5 overlaps almost perfectly with the α-helix in the omega loop, while TR23 is just downstream of the α-helix, suggesting that specific structural interventions affecting the α-helix are responsible for the increased MICs for ceftazidime (Fig. 1A–C). When excluding TRs 4, 5, and 23, the correlation between duplication size and MIC improved significantly (Fig. 1C). The MICs for ceftazidime of the mutant enzymes represent the congruent outcomes of the gained ceftazidime hydrolytic activity and the enzyme integrity after structural stabilization. Therefore, the high hydrolytic activity for ceftazidime conferred by the two duplications, TR5 and TR23, may have resulted from an optimal balance between the gained activity and the stability. Consistent with the notion that the α-helix structure may have been specifically affected by these TRs, the two mutations that had the highest MICs among the 29 amino acid substitution mutations in PenL, E166K and L169Q, occurred in the α-helix region4. Moreover, two deletion mutations associated with high MICs for ceftazidime, T171del and I173del, were also located just downstream of the α-helix region20.
To test whether longer duplications affect the melting temperature of the enzymes more severely than shorter ones, three duplications of different sizes, TR10, TR11, and TR13, were selected for assays (see Materials and Methods). Thermal shift assays showed that the melting temperature (Tm) of each enzyme was inversely correlated with the length of the duplication (Fig. 2A). Circular dichroism (CD) spectra of the wild type enzyme and those with TR10 and TR11 mutations showed similar overall profiles, suggesting that major α-helices and β-strands are well maintained regardless of the mutation. Significant changes (decreases in α-helices and β-strands) were mainly localized in the far-UV region (190–200 nm) in both mutant enzymes, and these changes were more prominent in the enzyme with TR11 (a longer duplication) (Fig. 2B). Overall, the data showed that the TR mutations did not result in significant perturbations in the overall enzyme structures, but mainly affected the omega loop region, which likely contributed to the lowered melting temperature of the enzymes (Fig. 2A).
TR mutant enzymes are specifically active against ceftazidime
To test the TR mutants for their substrate spectrum among β-lactams, in addition to the already known ceftazidime-hydrolyzing capability (Fig. 1), MIC values were measured for various antibiotics, including two penicillins (amoxicillin, penicillin G), two third-generation cephalosporins (ceftotaxime, ceftriaxone), a fourth-generation cephalosporin (cefepime), a monobactam (aztreonam), and a carbapenem (meropenem) (Table S1). A β-lactamase inhibitor, clavulanic acid, was also tested in conjunction with amoxicillin. Unlike that of ceftazidime, the MIC values of the TR mutants for these β-lactams were not higher than those of the wild-type and, in fact, were markedly lower (Table S1). The high susceptibility of wild-type PenL to the inhibitor clavulanic acid was not significantly altered by the TR mutations (Table S1). Together, the data showed that the TR mutations specifically optimized the enzymes for ceftazidime hydrolysis because they were the products from a selection against that particular antibiotic.
The structures of the wild-type and mutant PenLs
In an effort to understand the molecular processes by which structural stress in the omega loop is accommodated and leads to the gains in ceftazidime hydrolytic activity, we analyzed the structures of the wild-type (PenL-WT) and two mutant PenLs (PenL-tTR10 and PenL-tTR11; tTR represents translated TR) to a resolution of 1.5 Å-1.7 Å (Table S2, PDB IDs: 5GL9, 5GLA, and 5GLC, respectively), using the previously solved CTX-M-9 as a search model (PDB ID: 1YLJ). CTX-M-9 shares 55% amino acid identity with PenL-WT and has a low hydrolytic activity against ceftazidime, as does PenL-WT. Similar to other class A β-lactamases, the active site cavity of PenL-WT can be depicted as a tetrahedral organization, where one plane is open for the substrates, while the other three are composed of the omega loop (residues 161–179), structures including the β3 strand (residues 230–240), and the 102–107 loop and the neighboring 130–132 bend (Fig. 3A). These three planes meet at the center, where the N-terminal end of the α2 helix, containing the catalytic Ser70, is located (Fig. 3A). Analysis of the backbone structure of PenL-WT showed high-level structural conservation of the enzyme with homologs in the genus Burkholderia, with the calculated root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values of the Cα positions between the enzyme and the PenL homologs from B. pseudomallei (PDB ID: 3W4P, 89% amino acid identity) and B. multivorans7 (PDB ID: 3W4Q, 67% amino acid identity) being 0.36 Å and 0.56 Å, respectively. The RMSD values measured in the other class A β-lactamases, SHV-1 (PDB ID: 1SHV), TEM-1 (PDB ID: 1BTL), and CTX-M-9 (PDB ID: 1YLJ) were in the range of 1.5 to 2.4 Å, also showing high structural similarities to these enzymes. Consistently, the key residues in the active site of PenL-WT were superimposed closely with those in SHV-1, TEM-1, and CTX-M-9 (Fig. 3B).
In addition to these common features, PenL-WT showed two unique features in the active site compared to the homologs: an interaction between Arg104 and Thr167 and an increased number of water molecules in the active site (Fig. 3C). The interaction between Arg104 and Thr167 through a hydrogen bond (2.46 Å) tightened the binding cavity by linking the loop of amino acids 102–107 to the omega loop. Intriguingly, other class A β-lactamases such as SHV-1, TEM-1, and CTX-M-9 do not have such an interaction. The active site of PenL-WT had a fifth water molecule, W5 (Fig. 3C), while class A β-lactamases normally have three to four water molecules, including the catalytic water W1, which has a role in the deacylation reaction of the substrate. All of these water molecules participate in the extensive hydrogen-bond networks that indirectly connect the key active site residues Ser70, Asn132, Glu166, Asn170, and Thr237, which are gathered from all sides of the active site, appropriately positioning them for the catalytic activity (Fig. 3C).
In contrast to the PenL-WT structure, in which every residue could be mapped, PenL-tTR10 and PenL-tTR11 both had a highly disordered region, where the mapping of the residues was not feasible due to high mobility (Fig. 4). The unmapped region in each structure included the entire first repeat unit and the adjoining amino acids in the tTR (Fig. 4). In PenL-tTR10, two additional residues flanking the first unit on either side were not mapped (Fig. 4A). In PenL-tTR11, which has a longer tTR, nine residues in the upstream region of tTR11 were not mapped, in addition to the first repeat unit (Fig. 4B). The remaining tTRs in each structure, composing most of the second repeat unit, replaced the dislocated (unmapped) residues (Fig. 4). In both PenL-tTR10 and PenL-tTR11, it appeared that the α10 helix structure (13 residues: 183–195) downstream of (in the case of PenL-tTR10) or overlapping (in the case of PenL-tTR11) the tTR required the second repeat unit of the tTR, instead of the first unit, to be in place in the protein backbone (Fig. 5). It is reasonable to postulate that the structural perturbations caused by other tTRs are stabilized in a similar way, by extruding the extra residues from the omega loop region. The occurrence of a duplication as long as 56 residues, which included the entire omega loop, demonstrated the high stress-absorbing capacity of the omega loop. Such an adaptive capacity of the omega loop may allow significantly diverse mutations to occur in the loop and to lead to the formation of diverse altered active sites, some of which may have activity against new antibiotics.
Relaxation of the omega loop results in a widened binding cavity in PenL-tTRs
In the PenL-tTR structures, perturbations in the omega loop resulted in the dislocation of a number of nearby residues, along with the disorganization of the α-helix in the omega loop (Glu166-Asn170), which most notably led to the breakage of a salt bridge that is normally present between Thr167 and Arg104 and tightly packs the active-site cavity (Fig. 4). These disruptions further led to the dislocation of the 102–107 loop; the neighboring α3, α4, α5 helices; and Asp240, which is in the C-terminal section of the β3 strand (Fig. 5).
In addition to the backbone-level dislocations, the side chains of Asn170, Asp240, and Tyr105, which belong to each of the three walls of the active site, respectively, were reoriented, further widening the active site cavity (Fig. 4). In PenL-tTR10, the side chain of Asn170 exhibited a particularly large movement of 9.63 Å, causing it to swing 180° from the active site cavity. Asn170 was found to be further dislocated in PenL-tTR11, resulting in a wider opening in the active site cavity. Furthermore, the side chain of Asp240 was rotated approximately 90°, moving away from the active site by 3.21 Å in PenL-tTR10 and by 2.89 Å in PenL-tTR11. The side chain of Tyr105, which is known to be involved in substrate recognition and the stabilization of the enzyme-substrate complex28, was flipped and moved away from the active site by 1.17 Å in tTR10 and by 1.00 Å in tTR11 (Fig. 4). The volume of the active site in PenL-tTR10 was 274.9 Å3, as measured with CASTp29. This is much larger than that of PenL-WT, which was 182.3 Å3, demonstrating the extreme expansion of the active sites in the mutant enzyme. The precise volume of the active site in PenL-tTR11 could not be determined in the same manner because a key residue, Asn170, had swung away from the cavity. However, for the same reason, it is logical to assume that the active site in PenL-tTR11 is larger than that in PenL-tTR10.
The enlargement of the active site was accompanied by reorganization of the hydrogen-bond networks involving water molecules and active site residues (Fig. 4). The original hydrogen bond network inter-connecting Glu166, Asn170, and the catalytic water W1 was disrupted. Instead, a new hydrogen network connecting three water molecules, W1, W2, and W3, and the catalytic Ser70 was formed, maintaining the structural integrity of the active site (Fig. 4). The catalytic water W1 was also connected through a new hydrogen bond with a new water molecule, W6 in PenL-tTR10 (2.99 Å) and W7 in PenL-tTR11 (3.13 Å). Both of these new water molecules were located near the original position of the displaced Asn170, suggesting that water molecules W6 and W7 compensate for the role of the dislocated Asn170, as an anchor for W1 (Fig. 4). In PenL-tTR10, the interaction between W1 and the general base Glu166 remained, although the geometry was altered. This change in the active site was attributed to the low, promiscuous catalytic activity of the mutant enzyme (Table 1). In contrast, the interaction between W1 and Glu166 was lost in PenL-tTR11. In this case, Lys73 may act as an alternative general base. The dispensability of Glu166 in class A β-lactamases has been observed in a number of mutants, in which Glu166 was substituted or deleted, while the enzyme activity was not abolished30,31.
Binding of a ceftazidime analog induces reformation of the active site
To determine how a substrate binds to the expanded active site of the PenL-tTRs, we analyzed the structures of PenL-tTR10 and PenL-tTR11 complexed with ceftazidime-like glycylboronic acid (CBA) (PDB IDs: 5GLB and 5GLD, respectively). CBA is a member of the glycylboronates, transition-state analogues of β-lactam antibiotics, which have been used to investigate substrate recognition and catalytic mechanisms in class A β-lactamases6,32,33,34. CBA consists of two parts: a glycylboronate moiety that mimicks a transition state intermediate of acylation and a C7β side chain that mimicks the bulky C7β-aminothiazol carboxypropyloxyimino-amide side chain present in ceftazidime33.
The binding of CBA reduced the unmapped region by two residues, Ala171 and Ile172, in PenL-tTR10 (Fig. 5). More importantly, the α-helix of the omega loop was restored, consequently reestablishing the catalytic interactions among Glu166, Asn170, and the catalytic water W1 (Fig. 6A). In PenL-tTR11-CBA, the unmapped region was also reduced by two residues, Arg164 and Arg165 (Fig. 5). However, the restoration of the α-helix was not observed in PenL-tTR11-CBA, likely due to the longer tTR11 causing higher disorders in the region (Fig. 6A). CBA was positioned slightly differently in each PenL-tTR (Fig. 6A); in PenL-tTR11, the C7β side chain of CBA presided over the position where the side chains of Glu166 and Asn170 were present in PenL-tTR10-CBA (Fig. 6A). In this position, the bulky C7β side chain appeared to hamper the restoration of the omega-loop α-helix. CBA appeared to be stabilized in the active site of PenL-tTR11 though the interactions of CBA with Asp240 and Arg104. By contrast, the glycylboronate moiety of CBA exhibited a similar binding pattern in both PenL-tTRs, which mimicked the acylation transition state of β-lactam substrates and was similar to the bound conformation to other class A β-lactamases, such as TEM-1, CTX-M-9, and CTX-M-166,34 (Fig. S1). The structural information and the enzyme activities against ceftazidime (Fig. 1; Table 1) suggest that the acylation machineries of the PenL-tTRs operated properly, despite the seemingly massive disorganization of the omega loop.
In addition to the interactions occurring with the glycylboronate moiety, those involving the C7β side chain, which further stabilized the PenL-tTR-CBA complexes, were observed. In PenL-tTR10-CBA, the O12 of CBA was hydrogen-bonded to the Nδ2 of Asn132 and to W5, which was relocated to a position closer to Asn170 (Fig. 6A). In addition, the thiazole ring of CBA had a ring-stacking interaction with the hydroxyphenyl ring of Tyr105 (Fig. 6A). In PenL-tTR11-CBA, the O12 of CBA and Nδ2 of Asn132 also formed a hydrogen bond, although the distance between the two (3.22 Å) was longer than that in PenL-tTR10-CBA (2.92 Å) (Fig. 6A). Instead of bonding with W5, the O12 of CBA in PenL-tTR11-CBA made a second hydrogen bond (2.31 Å) with the side chain of Arg104, which was kinked and projected into the pocket (Fig. 6A). Moreover, the ring-stacking interaction between CBA and Tyr105 was not observed in PenL-tTR11-CBA, since the thiazole ring of CBA was flipped away from Tyr105 by approximately 120°, unlike that of PenL-tTR10 (Fig. 6A). Instead, CBA complexed with PenL-tTR11 was further stabilized through a hydrogen bond (3.21 Å) between the amino group of its aminothiazole ring and the Oδ1 of Asp240 (Fig. 6A). Although PenL-tTR10 and PenL-tTR11 exhibited differences from each other in their enzyme-ligand interaction patterns, their binding patterns were largely analogous to those in SHV-1 and CTX-M-9, respectively (Fig. 6A and S1). It is of note that the B factors for CBA in PenL-tTR10-CBA (18.7 Å2) and PenL-tTR11-CBA (42.6 Å2) were higher than those in SHV-1 (16.1 Å2) and CTX-M-9 (10.9 Å2), respectively, suggesting more flexible active sites in the PenL-tTRs. Consistent with the structural data, the CD spectra of PenL-tTR10-CBA and PenL-tTR11-CBA showed that much of the altered profiles of the mutant enzymes (Fig. 2B) were recovered upon CBA binding in the far-UV region (190~200 nm), reflecting induced-fit reformation of the active site (Fig. 6B). This recovery of the CD spectrum was more distinct with PenL-tTR10-CBA, which showed a highly-similar profile to that of PenL-WT (Fig. 6B).
Taken together, despite the highly dynamic and relaxed nature of the active sites of the PenL-tTRs, the binding mode of CBA to these proteins deviated little from the common binding paradigm shared among the other class A β-lactamase complexes, demonstrating the functional integrity of the acylation machineries and binding interactions. We conclude that the tTRs in the enzymes resulted in a temporary structural relaxation in the active site cavity, which allowed the access of bulky substrates—such as ceftazidime and CBA—to the cavity, which was re-packed after docking for the subsequent catalytic reactions.
TR mutations confers an increased affinity to a broad spectrum of β–lactams, which is not necessarily correlated with catalytic activities
The wild-type and three representative mutant enzymes (PenL-WT, PenL-tTR10, PenL-tTR11, and PenL-tTR13) were subjected to kinetic characterizations. While PenL-WT exhibited catalytic activities (kcat and kcat/Km) with nitrocefin, cefotaxime, penicillin G, and amoxicillin, PenL-tTRs exhibited loss of such activity (Table 1). However, the mutant enzymes, with their expanded, flexible active sites, exhibited a higher affinity (lower Km values) to all β–lactams tested than did PenL-WT, which exhibited particularly low affinity levels to the bulky β-lactams, ceftazidime and cefotaxime (Table 1). Despite their increased affinity to substrates, the mutant enzymes exhibited profoundly low turnover rates (kcat values) with all antibiotics tested (Table 1). The slow turnover rates seemed to greatly override the increased affinity, resulting in overall decrease in the catalytic activity (kcat/Km values) to most β-lactams. Intriguingly, the kcat values of PenL-tTRs with ceftazidime were not measurable (Table 1), although MIC values were certainly higher than those of the wild type (Fig. 1B). It has been shown that TEM β-lactamase variants with high affinity to ceftazidime and acylation activity without deacylation can lead to an increased MIC for ceftazidime via the covalent-trapping mechanism31. A similar mechanism may underlie the increased resistance to ceftazidime of the mutants with PenL-tTRs. On the other hand, PenL-tTRs were also shown to be more susceptible to catalytic inhibition by the β-lactamase inhibitor clavulanic acid, with IC50 values 4 to 5-fold lower than that of the wild type (Table 1).
These results are in accordance with our findings from the structural analyses that PenL-tTRs have flexible and widened active sites, and that their active site residues undergo conformation changes associated with substrate binding, leading to enhanced enzyme-substrate binding interactions. The data also show that PenL-tTRs have catalytic activity for ceftazidime at sub-optimal but physiologically meaningful catalytic efficiencies. This catalytic promiscuity is frequently observed in proteins that have flexible active sites35, and is observed in the early variants of ESBLs during their evolutionary development19 as the first step before further fine-tuning in the course of evolution.
The omega loop is characterized by the juxtaposition of the ends of the loop to each other, resembling the shape of a Greek letter Ω5. As a surface structure, it is involved in ligand recognition or catalysis in various proteins, such as phospholipase, immunoglobulins, trypsin, and chymotrypsin5. The large size range and variable locations of duplications in the omega loop that we characterized in this study demonstrate the extensive adaptive capacity of the omega loop against severe structural perturbations (Fig. 1). It is intriguing to uncover such remarkable flexibility of the omega loop, in that it can re-form by freeing extra residues from its internal structure, while minimizing disruptions in the main structure of the enzyme (Fig. 4).
A common effect resulting from the duplication mutations in the structures of the PenL-tTRs was the disruption of the α-helix in the omega loop structure, which led to a relaxed binding cavity (Fig. 4). However, there were differences in the restorations of the active site conformation during substrate binding in the PenL-tTRs. While PenL-tTR10 reconstituted the original conformation, PenL-tTR11 appeared to exploit the flexibility of the omega loop, allowing large conformational changes in the active site structure36. Such active site structures may form an ensemble consisting of a wide range of alternate structural conformers35, some of which provide enhanced accessibility of the activated catalytic water to the carbonyl carbon of the acyl intermediate, as suggested for the class C β-lactamase variants27,37.
From an evolutionary perspective, the omega loop of class A β-lactamases is a newly emerged structural element added to an ancestral penicillin binding protein (PBP), providing a deacylation activity embedded in the omega loop to evolve the PBP into a class A β-lactamase37,38. The successful evolution of an enzyme may rely on the manipulation of the active site loops while the scaffold and catalytic activity of the ancestral enzyme are maintained39. The active site loops can be affected by a variety of mutations, including highly destabilizing ones such as insertions, deletions, and recombinations39. With its remarkable adaptability, the omega loop is a hotbed for the evolution of class A β-lactamases, altering their substrate profiles and catalytic efficiencies in response to various selection pressures.
Bacterial strains and cultures
TR mutants of B. thailandensis strains were obtained from a large-scale in vitro evolution experiment, in which B. thailandensis mutants were selected from Luria Bertani (LB) plates containing 3–5 μg/ml of ceftazidime and were identified using sequence analysis, as described previously4. All Escherichia coli strains were grown in LB medium, and all B. thailandensis strains were grown in LB medium, Mueller-Hinton (MH) medium or Agrobacterium (AB) minimal medium containing 0.25% glucose (ABG) at 37 °C. The concentrations of antibiotics used for E. coli were as follows: tetracycline, 10 μg/ml; kanamycin, 50 μg/ml; and ampicillin, 100 μg/ml. For B. thailandensis, the concentrations of tetracycline and kanamycin used were 50 μg/ml and 250 μg/ml, respectively.
Determination of the MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) values
The MIC values for ceftazidime and amoxicillin were determined using the agar dilution method as described previously4. Concentrations of the antibiotics ranged from 0.5 to 32 μg/ml in increments of 2 μg/ml for ceftazidime and from 1 to 64 μg/ml using serial doubling for amoxicillin. MIC values for various other β-lactam antibiotics were measured by E-test following the manufacturer’s instructions (bioMérieux, France) as described previously4.
Production and purification of wild-type and mutant PenLs
The E. coli strain DH5α was used as the host for the construction of gene hybrids with protein expression vectors, and E. coli BL21 (DE3) was used for protein production. The plasmid pET-28a (+) (Novagen, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for cloning, sequencing, and protein expression. To produce the wild type and mutant PenL enzymes, E. coli BL21 cells that were transformed with the appropriate expression constructs were grown at 37 °C in one liter of LB medium containing 50 μg/ml of kanamycin, induced at the mid-exponential phase (A600 = 0.6) with 1 mM of isopropyl-β-D thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), grown for an additional five hours, and harvested by centrifugation (10,000 × g at 4 °C for 20 min). Bacterial pellets were lysed by sonication in buffer containing 20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and DNase I. His-tagged PenL in the lysate was initially purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The 6xHis tag and residual amino acids from the expression vector were removed by thrombin protease cleavage following dialysis in a thrombin-cleavage buffer (20 mM Tris pH7.5, 100 mM NaCl). The cleaved protein was further purified by Mono S affinity chromatography (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and gel filtration on a Hi-Load 16/60 Superdex 200 column (GE Healthcare) in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-Cl and 50 mM NaCl at pH 7.5. The enzyme purity was assessed using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with a 14% separating gel.
Determination of kinetic parameters
Kinetic assays were carried out following the procedure described by Galleni et al.40, using the cuvette section of a SpectraMax M2 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Briefly, purified enzymes were diluted with assay buffer (50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), supplemented with 20 μg/ml of bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Bovogen, Victoria, Australia)). Enzymes in 50 μl of the assay buffer were mixed with 450 μl of a substrate in various concentrations. Reactions were carried out at 25 °C, and the absorbance was analyzed for 90–120 secs at 6-sec intervals using SoftMax Pro V5 software. Steady-state kinetic parameters were calculated by fitting initial rates to the Michaelis-Menten equation (equation 1) using GraFit 7 software (Erithacus Software Ltd., Stains, UK).
For poor substrates such as ceftazidime and amoxicillin whose kinetic parameters could not be determined using the method described above, competitive assays were performed using nitrocefin as the reporter substrate and the poor substrate as an inhibitor. Reactions were carried out at 25 °C in a final reaction volume of 500 μl containing 50 or 100 μM of nitrocefin, 1.4–176 μM of inhibitor, and 4.5–200 nM of enzyme. Values were calculated from the slope of the line in which v0/vi values were plotted versus I (see equation 2), and Ki values of the poor substrates were used as their Km values.
For determination of kcat values of the poor substrates, Vmax values were obtained from the initial rates of the reactions, in which the substrate concentration greatly exceeds the Km values. Reactions and absorbance data acquisition were carried out as described above.
The IC50 for clavulanic acid was determined using competitive assays where 100 μM of nitrocefin was competed against 0–44 μM of clavulanic acid for binding to the enzymes in a 500-μl reaction volume. The IC50 was obtained by fitting the reaction rate and the concentration of an inhibitor to the 4-parameter equation of IC50 using GraFit 7 software (Erithacus Software Ltd, Stains, UK). Concentrations of the enzymes, substrates and inhibitors used for kinetic assay are summarized in Table 1. All the values listed in Table 1 are shown as the average ± standard deviation of the values obtained from three independent measurements. Molar extinction coefficients and the wavelengths at which absorbance data were acquired are as follows: Nitrocefin, 15000 M−1cm−1 at 482 nM; Amoxicillin-1100 M−1cm−1 at 232 nm; Ceftazidime-8660 M−1cm−1 at 260 nm; Cefotaxime −7500 M−1cm−1 at 260 nm; Penicillin G −560 M−1cm−1 at 240 nm.
X-ray crystallographic data collection, structure determination, and refinement
Purified proteins were concentrated to approximately 7 mg/ml for hanging-drop crystallization trials, for which 1 μl of each protein sample was mixed with 1 μl each of various well solutions. PenL-WT crystals formed in a well solution containing 0.1 M Tris pH 8.5, 0.1 M Li-sulfate, 30% (w/v) PEG 4000, and 15% glycerol within four days at 20 °C. Crystals of PenL-tTR10 and PenL-tTR11 formed in a well solution containing 30% (w/v) polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether 2,000 (PEGMME 2000), 0.1 M K-thiocyanate, and 10% glycerol after one week of incubation at 4 °C.
The crystals were soaked in mother liquor (cryoprotectant) for 30 s and were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. X-ray diffraction data were collected at a resolution of 1.5 Å from PenL-WT on the PAL-7A beamline and at a resolution of 1.5 and 1.6 Å from PenL-tTR10 and PenL-tTR11, respectively, on the PAL-5C beamline at the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (Pohang, Republic of Korea). To obtain crystals of PenL-tTR10 and PenL-tTR11 that were complexed with CBA, protein crystals were soaked with CBA (2 mM) in a cryoprotectant containing 5% dimethylsulfoxide, 30% (w/v) PEGMME 2000, 0.1 M K-thiocyanate, and 10% glycerol overnight at 4 °C, and were then flash-frozen. Data were collected on the PAL-5C beamline, which diffracted the X-rays to 1.6 Å for complexed PenL-tTR10 and 1.7 Å for complexed PenL-tTR11, respectively. All data were processed with HKL-2000 software (HKL Research Inc., Charlottesville, VA, USA).
Unless otherwise stated, model building and refinement were performed with the COOT 9 and REFMAC programs in the Collaborative Computational Project Number 4 suite (CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory, Didcot, UK), and figures were prepared with the PyMOL program ( http://www.pymol.org). Molecular replacement solutions for PenL-WT were obtained with the program MOLREP 10 (correlation coefficient = 79.0%, R-factor = 34.9%) and using CTX-M-9 (PDB code: 1YLJ) as a search model with the water and ions removed. The refined PenL-WT PDB was used as a search model for further molecular replacements for PenL-tTR10, PenL-tTR11, PenL-tTR10-CBA, and PenL-tTR11-CBA, resulting in a correlation coefficient of 92.4% and R-factor of 24.4% for PenL-tTR10, a correlation coefficient of 91.6% and R-factor of 24.2% for PenL-tTR10-CBA, a correlation coefficient of 92.2% and R-factor of 24.4% for PenL-tTR11, and a correlation coefficient of 91.9% and R-factor of 24.7% for PenL-tTR11-CBA. In particular, the CBA PDB file was created using the PHENIX program LIGANDFIT41 and was fitted into a Fo-Fc density that was consistent with the ligand during the building of the PenL-tTR10-CBA and PenL-tTR11-CBA models in COOT. The refinements for all of the models that could be expected at those resolutions converged to reasonable values (Table S2).
Protein thermal shift assay
Melting curves of PenL-WT and the PenL-tTRs were obtained using a Protein Thermal ShiftTM kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, purified proteins were mixed with ROX, a fluorescent dye, to a final concentration of 15 μM and were subjected to a melting curve experiment on a 7500 Real-Time PCR machine (Applied Biosystems). The protein melting reaction was carried out in a total volume of 20 μl and consisted of two steps: (1) temperature, 25 °C; time, 2 min; ramp rate, 100% and (2) temperature, 99 °C; time, 2 min; ramp rate, 1%. The obtained melting curve data from the 7500 software were imported into the Protein Thermal ShiftTM software (Applied Biosystems) and further analyzed to calculate the Boltzmann melting temperature, Tm, which is the reflection point in the original sigmoidal melting curve. The average of three repeated experiments was reported.
Circular dichroism spectra assay
Circular dichroism (CD) spectra were measured with a Jasco J-810 spectropolarimeter with a Peltier temperature-controlled cuvette holder. The CD spectra of the enzyme samples (25 μM, ~0.7 mg/ml) in a buffer (20 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl) were measured using a cuvette with a 0.1-cm path length, in the far-UV region (190–250 nm). Baselines were determined using the buffer solution from the final gel-filtration step of protein purification. Triplicate scans were run for each enzyme at 0.1 nm intervals with a 1 nm bandwidth with and without CBA. For CD scans of the PenL-CBA complexes, concentrated CBA (100 μM) prepared in the same buffer was diluted to 50 μM, either in protein solution or buffer, and incubated at room temperature for 1 hr prior to the measurement. The trace for PenL-CBA was corrected by subtracting the spectral values of the solution containing only 50 μM of CBA. Data are presented as the average of the three CD spectra, after smoothing using Spectra ManagerTM (ver 2.8).
How to cite this article: Yi, H. et al. High adaptability of the omega loop underlies the substrate-spectrum-extension evolution of a class A β-lactamase, PenL. Sci. Rep. 6, 36527; doi: 10.1038/srep36527 (2016).
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Livermore, D. Beta-lactamase-mediated resistance and opportunities for its control. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 41, 25–41 (1998).
Salverda, M. L., De Visser, J. A. & Barlow, M. Natural evolution of TEM-1 beta-lactamase: experimental reconstruction and clinical relevance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34, 1015–1036 (2010).
Matagne, A., Lamotte-Brasseur, J. & Frere, J. Catalytic properties of class A β-lactamases: efficiency and diversity. Biochem. J 330, 581–598 (1998).
Yi, H. et al. Twelve Positions in a β-Lactamase That Can Expand Its Substrate Spectrum with a Single Amino Acid Substitution. PLoS ONE 7, e37585 (2012).
Fetrow, J. S. Omega loops: nonregular secondary structures significant in protein function and stability. The FASEB Journal 9, 708–717 (1995).
Delmas, J. et al. Structure and Dynamics of CTX-M Enzymes Reveal Insights into Substrate Accommodation by Extended-spectrum β-Lactamases. Journal of Molecular Biology 375, 192–201 (2008).
Papp-Wallace, K. M. et al. Insights into β-Lactamases from Burkholderia Species, Two Phylogenetically Related yet Distinct Resistance Determinants. Journal of Biological Chemistry 288, 19090–19102 (2013).
Kuzin, A. P. et al. Structure of the SHV-1 β-lactamase. Biochemistry 38, 5720–5727 (1999).
Jelsch, C., Mourey, L., Masson, J. M. & Samama, J. P. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli TEM1 β‐lactamase at 1.8 Å resolution. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 16, 364–383 (1993).
Yi, H. et al. The Tandem Repeats Enabling Reversible Switching between the Two Phases of β-Lactamase Substrate Spectrum. PLoS Genet 10, e1004640 (2014).
Poirel, L. et al. CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamase that hydrolyzes ceftazidime through a single amino acid substitution in the omega loop. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45, 3355–3361 (2001).
Bae, I. K. et al. A novel ceftazidime-hydrolysing extended-spectrum β-lactamase, CTX-M-54, with a single amino acid substitution at position 167 in the omega loop. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 58, 315–319 (2006).
Stürenburg, E., Kühn, A., Mack, D. & Laufs, R. A novel extended-spectrum β-lactamase CTX-M-23 with a P167T substitution in the active-site omega loop associated with ceftazidime resistance. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 54, 406–409 (2004).
Kurokawa, H. et al. A New TEM-Derived Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (TEM-91) with an R164C Substitution at the Ω-Loop Confers Ceftazidime Resistance. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 47, 2981–2983 (2003).
Petrosino, J. F. & Palzkill, T. Systematic mutagenesis of the active site omega loop of TEM-1 beta- lactamase. J. Bacteriol. 178, 1821–1828 (1996).
Bradford, P. A. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clinical microbiology reviews 14, 933–951 (2001).
Page, M. G. P. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: structure and kinetic mechanism. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 14, 63–74 (2008).
Stojanoski, V. et al. A Triple Mutant in the Ω-loop of TEM-1 β-lactamase Changes the Substrate Profile via a Large Conformational Change and an Altered General Base for Catalysis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 290, 10382–10394 (2015).
Wang, X., Minasov, G. & Shoichet, B. K. Evolution of an antibiotic resistance enzyme constrained by stability and activity trade-offs. J Mol Biol 320, 85–95 (2002).
Hwang, J., Cho, K.-H., Song, H., Yi, H. & Kim, H. S. Deletion mutations conferring substrate spectrum extension in the class A β-lactamase. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2014).
Yi, H., Kim, K., Cho, K.-H., Jung, O. & Kim, H. S. Substrate Spectrum Extension of PenA in Burkholderia thailandensis with a Single Amino Acid Deletion, Glu168del. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 56, 4005–4008 (2012).
Arpin, C. et al. SHV-16, a beta-lactamase with a pentapeptide duplication in the omega loop. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45, 2480–2485 (2001).
Poirel, L., Rodriguez-Martinez, J. M., Plesiat, P. & Nordmann, P. Naturally Occurring Class A beta-Lactamases from the Burkholderia cepacia Complex. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 53, 876–882 (2009).
Brett, P. J., DeShazer, D. & Woods, D. E. Note: Burkholderia thailandensis sp. nov., a Burkholderia pseudomallei-like species. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 48, 317–320 (1998).
Poirel, L., Rodriguez-Martinez, J. M., Plesiat, P. & Nordmann, P. Naturally occurring Class A ss-lactamases from the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53, 876–882 (2009).
Wuthiekanun, V. & Peacock, S. J. Management of melioidosis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 4, 445–455 (2006).
Thomas, V. L., McReynolds, A. C. & Shoichet, B. K. Structural bases for stability–function tradeoffs in antibiotic resistance. Journal of molecular biology 396, 47–59 (2010).
Doucet, N., De Wals, P.-Y. & Pelletier, J. N. Site-saturation Mutagenesis of Tyr-105 Reveals Its Importance in Substrate Stabilization and Discrimination in TEM-1 β-Lactamase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 46295–46303 (2004).
Dundas, J. et al. CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues. Nucleic acids research 34, W116–W118 (2006).
Stojanoski, V. et al. A Triple Mutant in the Ω-loop of TEM-1 β-Lactamase Changes the Substrate Profile via a Large Conformational Change and an Altered General Base for Catalysis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 290, 10382–10394 (2015).
Antunes, N. T., Frase, H., Toth, M., Mobashery, S. & Vakulenko, S. B. Resistance to the third-generation cephalosporin ceftazidime by a deacylation-deficient mutant of the TEM β-lactamase by the uncommon covalent-trapping mechanism. Biochemistry 50, 6387–6395 (2011).
Chen, Y., Shoichet, B. & Bonnet, R. Structure, function, and inhibition along the reaction coordinate of CTX-M beta-lactamases. J Am Chem Soc 127, 5423–5434 (2005).
Ke, W. et al. Novel insights into the mode of inhibition of class A SHV-1 β-lactamases revealed by boronic acid transition state inhibitors. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 55, 174–183 (2011).
Minasov, G., Wang, X. & Shoichet, B. K. An ultrahigh resolution structure of TEM-1 beta-lactamase suggests a role for Glu166 as the general base in acylation. J Am Chem Soc 124, 5333–5340 (2002).
Tokuriki, N. & Tawfik, D. S. Protein dynamism and evolvability. Science 324, 203–207 (2009).
Marsh, J. A., Teichmann, S. A. & Forman-Kay, J. D. Probing the diverse landscape of protein flexibility and binding. Current opinion in structural biology 22, 643–650 (2012).
Massova, I. & Mobashery, S. Kinship and diversification of bacterial penicillin-binding proteins and β-lactamases. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 42, 1–17 (1998).
Dutta, M., Kar, D., Bansal, A., Chakraborty, S. & Ghosh, A. S. A single amino acid substitution in the Ω-like loop of E. coli PBP5 disrupts its ability to maintain cell shape and intrinsic beta-lactam resistance. Microbiology 161, 895–902 (2015).
Tawfik, D. S. Loop grafting and the origins of enzyme species. Science-new york then washington - 311, 475 (2006).
Galleni, M. et al. Use of the chromosomal class A beta-lactamase of Mycobacterium fortuitum D316 to study potentially poor substrates and inhibitory beta-lactam compounds. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 38, 1608–1614 (1994).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography 66, 213–221 (2010).
Ambler, R. P. et al. A standard numbering scheme for the class A beta-lactamases. Biochem J 276 (Pt 1), 269–270 (1991).
This work was supported by grants NRF-2015R1A2A2A01004007 and 2015M3C9A4053393 to H.S.K and grants 2010–0005114 and 2013R1A1A2057465 to S.H.L, all from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of the Republic of Korea. Additional support was provided by grant 2013R1A1A2062553 for research fellows from the NRF of the Republic of Korea to HY.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Yi, H., Choi, J., Hwang, J. et al. High adaptability of the omega loop underlies the substrate-spectrum-extension evolution of a class A β-lactamase, PenL. Sci Rep 6, 36527 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36527
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.