Tyrosinases are responsible for melanin formation in all life domains. Tyrosinase inhibitors are used for the prevention of severe skin diseases, in skin-whitening creams and to avoid fruit browning, however continued use of many such inhibitors is considered unsafe. In this study we provide conclusive evidence of the inhibition mechanism of two well studied tyrosinase inhibitors, KA (kojic acid) and HQ (hydroquinone), which are extensively used in hyperpigmentation treatment. KA is reported in the literature with contradicting inhibition mechanisms, while HQ is described as both a tyrosinase inhibitor and a substrate. By visualization of KA and HQ in the active site of TyrBm crystals, together with molecular modeling, binding constant analysis and kinetic experiments, we have elucidated their mechanisms of inhibition, which was ambiguous for both inhibitors. We confirm that while KA acts as a mixed inhibitor, HQ can act both as a TyrBm substrate and as an inhibitor.
Tyrosinases belong to the type 3 copper-containing protein family together with hemocynanins that serve as oxygen carriers1,2, and catechol oxidases that are strict diphenolases3,4. The two copper ions in the conserved active site, CuA and CuB, are coordinated by six histidine residues5,6,7. Tyrosinases hydroxylate monophenols to form ortho-diphenols (monophenolase activity) and subsequently oxidize the o-diphenols to o-quinones (diphenolase activity). Melanin is formed rapidly by the spontaneous polymerization of the quinones5,8. Monophenols can react only with the oxy state of tyrosinase, which represents about 15% of the enzyme molecules in solution9. In the presence of o-diphenols such as L-dopa (L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine), both the oxy and met forms react enabling the production of o-quinones4,9.
Disorder in melanin formation has been found to cause a variety of skin diseases in humans such as hyperpigmentation, lentigo, vitiligo and skin cancer10. Furthermore, appearance of brown pigments in fruits and vegetables due to tyrosinase activity is a leading cause for postharvest losses9. Therefore, tyrosinase inhibitors are highly warranted by the pharmaceutical, cosmetics and food industries11,12,13,14,15.
Kojic acid (KA), a fungal metabolite, is the most widely used skin-whitening agent with possible side effects being dermatitis, sensitization and erythema9,16. Animal experiments suggested possible tumor promotion and weak carcinogenicity, and thus concentrations of 1% are recommended for safe human use17. Numerous contradicting mechanisms are described in the literature for KA as either a competitive or mixed inhibitor for mushroom tyrosinase18,19,20, possibly by chelating copper in the active site18,20,21,22. Previously, KA was found bound at the entrance to the active site of TyrBm (tyrosinase from Bacillus megaterium), suggesting one significant intermediate binding site. However, the full mechanism of KA inhibition still remains unclear22.
Hydroquinone (HQ), another well-studied whitening agent, has been used clinically in leading cosmetic hyperpigmentation treatment23, however, it was also found to cause serious problems by generating reactive oxygen species leading to oxidative damage of lipids and permanent loss of melanocytes. Subsequently, HQ has been banned for the general use by the European Committee and can be prescribed by dermatologists only13,16. Previous studies suggested that HQ is a competitive inhibitor of tyrosinase24,25, while others demonstrated the potency of HQ as a tyrosinase substrate26,27. Garcia-Canovas and co-workers suggested that the enzymatic activity is not evident since HQ is not able to transform met-tyrosinase to the oxy-form26, and that the transformation may be substantial by addition of an o-diphenol or H2O226,28. However, to date, no structural data is available in order to elucidate the orientation of HQ in the active site of tyrosinase.
Most mechanistic studies on tyrosinase inhibitors use KA or HQ as the comparative benchmark compound. Therefore, in depth analysis of their mechanism and inhibition mode are crucial for further development of potent inhibitors.
In this study, we elucidate the inhibition mechanism of these inhibitors by crystal structure determination of TyrBm with bound KA and HQ in the active site, along with biochemical characterizations, binding constants determination and molecular modeling.
Inhibition mode of TyrBm activity
The most widely used and effective tyrosinase inhibitors, HQ and KA9,29, were tested for their inhibitory effect on TyrBm. Overall, our results clearly show that KA and HQ have different inhibition modes on TyrBm monophenolase (L-tyrosine) and diphenolase (L-dopa) activities. While KA displays a mixed inhibition mode on both activities (Fig. 1 and Table 1), HQ is a competitive inhibitor of monophenols, and shows no inhibition of diphenols (Fig. 2 and Table 1), in contrast to previous reports that define HQ as a competitive inhibitor for both activities24,25. Our kinetic study showed no inhibition by HQ in the presence of L-dopa since with rising concentrations of HQ, Km values decreased (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. S1a).
The IC50 values representing inhibitor concentrations in which TyrBm activity was reduced by 50% were obtained from dose-response curves (Supplementary Fig. S2). The IC50 values for KA and HQ on the monophenol were 26.8 and 32.0 μM respectively, while the IC50 value for KA on the diphenol was 52 μM (Table 1). Similar results were obtained in previous reports for mushroom tyrosinase, with values for KA inhibition on monophenols and diphenols of 5.7 and 30.1 μM, respectively30,31, and the value for HQ inhibition on monophenols of 33.5 μM32. Since we observed that HQ does not inhibit tyrosinase in the presence of L-dopa, the value of IC50 was not determined. García-Canovas and co-workers suggested that HQ is a tyrosinase substrate and not an inhibitor although activity is not evident under conventional conditions since HQ cannot transform met-tyrosinase into oxy-tyrosinase26. However, in the presence of an o-diphenol (e.g. L-dopa) or H2O2, oxy-tyrosinase is generated and HQ becomes a substrate which is hydroxylated to 2-hydroxyhydroquinone and subsequently to 2-hydroxy-p-benzoquinone (HPB) that can be measured spectrophotometrically26. Our spectrophotometric measurements confirm their results, since with the addition of H2O2 or L-dopa, product formation by TyrBm increased in the presence of HQ (Supplementary Fig. S1). Furthermore, the same trend was observed by direct measurement of TyrBm activity through recording of the oxygen consumption during the reaction (Supplementary Fig. S3). The activity of TyrBm in the presence of L-dopa and HQ was 8% higher than with L-dopa alone for oxygen consumption measurements, and 17% higher as determined by absorbance readings.
In addition, when an activity test was performed for several hours with HQ as a sole substrate in comparison to a control without enzyme, low activity was visually observed, even without the addition of H2O2 or L-dopa, and a light brown color was detected after 3 hours of incubation (the control remained colorless). Moreover, the low inhibitory effect of HQ was also evident in another kinetic study with mushroom tyrosinase that exhibited an IC50 value 80-fold higher when L-dopa was used, in comparison to L-tyrosine24. Since HQ requires a reducing agent in order to become a TyrBm substrate, the kinetic parameters of the monophenolase activity were determined in the presence of H2O2. The Km and Vmax values were 0.27 mM and 19 μmole min−1 mg−1, respectively, which are similar to the kinetic parameters of L-dopa (Table 2). A similar Km value of 0.25 mM was reported by García-Canovas and co-workers for Agaricus bisporus tyrosinase26.
Effects of KA and HQ on the kinetic parameters of TyrBm
The kinetic constants of TyrBm monophenolase and diphenolase activities were determined for L-tyrosine and L-dopa (Table 2). The values obtained in the presence of KA and HQ were calculated from Lineweaver–Burk plots (Figs 1 and 2; Table 1). With rising concentrations of KA, the Km values of the monophenolase activity increased and the Vmax values decreased, an indication of a mixed mode of inhibition, with an inhibition constant KI of 1.1 μM and KIS of 61 μM. The apparent Km and Vmax were 0.04 mM and 9.7 μmole min−1 mg−1, respectively (Table 1). When increasing concentrations of KA were added in the presence of L-dopa as the substrate, a similar mode of mixed inhibition was observed, with KI of 3.5 μM and KIS of 150 μM, similar to previous studies that reported KI values of 3.4, 5 and 4.7 μM for mushroom tyrosinase18,19,33. The apparent Km and Vmax of the diphenolase reaction were 0.18 mM and 34 μmole min−1 mg−1, respectively (Table 1). The mixed inhibition mode implies that KA binding is not limited to the active site. In a previous study we have already experimentally demonstrated that a peripheral KA binding site exists in TyrBm22.
Increasing concentrations of HQ in the presence of L-tyrosine, resulted in an increase in the Km value while the Vmax remained constant, an indication of a competitive inhibition mode on the monophenolase activity, with a KI of 40 μM and apparent Km and Vmax values of 0.07 mM and 9.0 μmole min−1 mg−1, respectively (Fig. 2a and Table 1). A similar inhibition mechanism was also reported by Chawla et al., with KI of 83 μM for mushroom tyrosinase25.
Binding affinity of L-tyrosine vs. inhibitors
In order to obtain a clearer understanding of the fashion by which substrates and inhibitors bind to tyrosinase, we have determined dissociation constants (KD) between TyrBm and its substrates or inhibitors using MicroScale Thermophoresis34. Surprisingly, such KD values had not been previously measured. These experiments were performed by titrating fluorescently-labeled TyrBm with increasing concentrations of KA, HQ or L-tyrosine as the unlabeled ligands. According to the thermophoretic data points obtained with increasing concentrations of the ligands, the dissociation constants were evaluated. The KD values of the TyrBm-KA, TyrBm-HQ and TyrBm-L-tyrosine interactions were determined as 377, 9 and 0.1 μM, respectively (Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. S4). According to these results, L-tyrosine, the natural substrate, showed the highest affinity to TyrBm in comparison with KA and HQ. While HQ showed a dissociation constant 90-fold higher than L-tyrosine, KA exhibited a value of nearly 4000-fold higher than the natural substrate.
Structure of TyrBm with KA in the active site
In addition to the peripheral binding site of KA (PDB 3NQ1), we have recently determined the structures of TyrBm with L-tyrosine, L-dopa and the substrate analog p-tyrosol35, all found within the active site. We present here the crystal structure of TyrBm with KA bound in the active site at 2.6 Å resolution (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. S5 and Table 4). The possible movement of KA within the active site can be envisioned from Fig. 3a in which KA is shown in two positions: the peripheral site we reported earlier22, and in the active site. At the entrance to the active site, KA is stabilized by interactions with Phe197, Pro201, Asn205, and Arg209 (Fig. 3b)22. In the active site, KA is stabilized by π-π interactions with His208 that coordinates CuB, similar to tyrosinase substrates (Fig. 3c), as presented by Goldfeder et al. and suggested in other studies35,36,37. The hydroxyl group of KA is oriented towards CuA with a distance of 3.3 Å, while the distance of the carbonyl group to CuA is 5.5 Å. These results are supported by a recent docking study of Lima et al.18, and contradict a previously proposed inhibition mechanism of KA by copper chelation20,21,22.
In silico simulations of KA and HQ in the active site
TyrBm structure with KA at the entrance to the active site was used as an initial model to run an extensive non-biased ligand migration simulations with PELE (Protein Energy Landscape Exploration) in a constrained sphere of 20 Å (from the initial ligand center of mass)38. By means of 128 processors and 24 hours, ~200,000 different ligand conformations were obtained that allowed to evaluate the absolute binding free energy (∆G) by Markov State Models (MSM) analysis39. Briefly, MSM first involves clustering all conformations (a total number of 100 clusters were used) in metastable states and building the transition matrix between them. The obtained clusters overlap mostly with the two positions of KA, at the peripheral site and in the active site (Fig. 4). Integration of these cluster centers (with respect to the bulk solvent) allowed determining the binding free energy for the active site structure of −5.5 kcal/mol, whereas the surface bound complex was only of −1.4 kcal/mol. Therefore, the transition from the surface bound complex to the active site is exothermic and likely to occur.
An analogous simulation was also performed for HQ. In contrast to KA, HQ showed a significant larger mobility in the active site, where multiple orientations are frequently visited. This is clearly seen when analyzing the metastable states (after MSM clustering) accessible within 1 kcal/mol from the best-bound minima (Supplementary Fig. S6). While KA presents mainly two orientations (that occupy similar volume), HQ adopts multiple orientations exploring a larger area of the active site. Interestingly, for HQ we found structures (within the lowest 1 kcal/mol) involving the peripheral site, which for KA is about 4.1 kcal/mol above the best-bound minima (Fig. 4).
Structure of TyrBm with HQ in the active site
The kinetic measurements with HQ indicated that it is a poor substrate of TyrBm under natural conditions, and a good substrate in conditions favoring oxy-tyrosinase. In order to trap HQ in the active site of TyrBm, mature crystals were soaked with zinc instead of copper ions to prevent enzymatic activity22,35,40. We have obtained two different structures of TyrBm with HQ bound in the active site (Supplementary Figs S7 and S8) at 2.2 Å resolution (Table 4). The HQ hydroxyl group is oriented towards ZnA, and its benzyl ring is stabilized through hydrophobic interactions with His208, similar to tyrosine substrates (Fig. 5a)35. HQ was observed to bind in three different orientations in total in the active site of TyrBm (orientations 1, 2 and 3) (Fig. 5, Supplementary Figs S7 and S8). It seems that HQ binding is rather flexible in the active site, agreeing with the in silico simulations shown above, and does not have one specific orientation in contrast to L-tyrosine and L-dopa (Fig. 5)35. In orientation 1, a polar interaction between HQ and Asn205 is observed (Fig. 5b). In orientation 2, the HQ molecule is oriented similarly to tyrosinase substrates (and KA) in the active site, supporting our kinetic experiments showing that HQ can act as a TyrBm substrate (Fig. 5a). In addition, when TyrBm crystals were soaked with copper and HQ for 16 hours, the crystals turned brown, in comparison to crystals that were soaked with zinc that did not show a change in color (data not shown). Brown TyrBm crystals indicate on substrate oxidation as was previously shown by Sendovski et al. and provide additional confirmation on the role of HQ as a substrate of TyrBm22.
Disorders in melanin formation have been linked to various skin diseases in humans such as hyperpigmentation and skin cancer. KA and HQ, are frequently used as inhibitors of tyrosinase, and have been used as skin-whitening agents in leading cosmetic hyperpigmentation treatment9,13,14,16. Over the past few years, numerous docking studies and molecular dynamic simulations were performed in an attempt to elucidate the binding modes of tyrosinase inhibitors. In this work we demonstrate for the first time the true binding orientations of KA and HQ in the active site of TyrBm which explain the biochemical characterization.
Previously, we had determined a crystal structure of TyrBm with KA bound at the entrance to the active site22. Here, by modifying our protocol for ligand binding in crystal, we have visualized the structure of TyrBm with KA bound in the active site similar to tyrosinase substrates (Fig. 3c). This position of KA might lead to the false assumption of competitive inhibition mechanism. However, the two orientations of KA, which are demonstrated by crystallography and in silico simulations (Figs 3 and 4), support the mixed inhibition mechanism, which is confirmed by our kinetic experiments (Fig. 1 and Table 1).
In contrast to previous studies18,19,20, in this work we unequivocally display mixed inhibition mode of KA on both monophenolase and diphenolase activities and undermine the hypothesis regarding copper chelation by KA. Since the KIS value is significantly greater than KI for the oxidation of both L-tyrosine and L-dopa (Table 1), KA is able to bind more strongly to the free enzyme than to the enzyme–substrate complex (at the peripheral site). We suggest that when KA is bound strongly in the active site, the binding pocket is not accessible to substrate molecules, subsequently TyrBm is not active. However, when KA is oriented at the entrance of the active site, it restricts substrate entrance and product efflux, consequently, TyrBm cannot reach its maximum velocity (Table 1). Tropolone, another tyrosinase inhibitor that has been studied, was also found at the entrance of the active site of mushroom tyrosinase and exhibited mixed inhibition mode similar to KA41,42. It is quite possible, that KA may also bind to this site or has a different peripheral binding site yet to be elucidated. Together with the fact that KA showed a dissociation constant 3-orders of magnitude higher than L-tyrosine, these findings support the existence of a significant intermediate binding site in TyrBm and explains the mechanism of mixed inhibition.
Numerous studies have raised questions regarding the behavior of HQ as a tyrosinase inhibitor26,27, and most of them characterized HQ as a competitive inhibitor24,43,44,45. Our results support this inhibition mode of HQ on L-tyrosine (Fig. 2a and Table 1). On the other hand, other studies demonstrated the potency of HQ as a tyrosinase substrate26,27. Stratford and co-workers suggested that HQ is neither a substrate nor an inhibitor of tyrosinase27 while del Mar García-Molina et al. suggested that HQ is a tyrosinase substrate with a poor activity due to the inability to transform met-tyrosinase to oxy-tyrosinase on its own26. The transformation is achieved by addition of an o-diphenol (such as L-dopa) or H2O2, which promotes the activity on HQ26,28. Our results corroborate this argument, since in the presence of H2O2 or L-dopa, TyrBm was indeed active on HQ as measured by two unrelated methods (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Figs S1 and S3). These findings led us to determine the kinetic constants of TyrBm with HQ as a substrate, which resulted in a similar Km value for HQ and L-dopa, and a Vmax value higher than that of L-tyrosine (Table 2).
Additional conclusive evidence for the action of TyrBm on HQ lies in the formation of brown crystals soaked in HQ that indicate on substrate oxidation as was previously shown by Sendovski et al. with L-tyrosine22. We assume that small amounts of oxy-TyrBm molecules present in the crystals enabled the activity on HQ within 16 hours that resulted in brown pigmentation9.
In order to elucidate the inhibition mechanism of HQ, we solved two crystal structures of TyrBm with HQ in the active site. It was discovered that HQ is bound less strongly than L-tyrosine (Table 3), and its binding heterogeneity is evident from the several different orientations observed in the active site (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. S7). It is presumed that the polar amine and carboxyl groups of L-tyrosine and L-dopa, which are not present in HQ, help to stabilize the substrates through polar interactions with Arg209 in a productive mode (Fig. 5a)35. In orientation 1, a hydrogen bond between HQ and Asn205 was observed (Fig. 5b). Asn205 was suggested to be crucial for tyrosinase activity through the activation of a conserved water molecule35,46. The interaction of Asn205 with HQ might prevent this activation, and thus inhibit tyrosinase activity18,47,48. Furthermore, in the structures of TyrBm with KA at the entrance of the active site this interaction was also found to be important for KA stabilization22. Thus, we propose that the polar bond between Asn205 and the hydroxyl group of HQ indicates on an inhibitory effect on TyrBm. In contrast, in orientation 2, HQ is positioned similarly to L-tyrosine in the active site (Fig. 5a), supporting the role of HQ as TyrBm substrate. The flexibility of HQ in the active site of TyrBm was also demonstrated by our PELE simulations, which provided visualization of the numerous energetically feasible orientations of HQ in the active site. Whereas for KA it takes some time and energy to go from the peripheral docking site to the inner active site, for HQ there is constant interconversion between the two of them suggesting that the pre-docking site is very transient.
It seems that the combination of both the orientation of HQ in the active site and the oxidative state of tyrosinase will define the behavior of HQ.
Expression, purification and crystallization of tyrosinase from B. megaterium
Tyrosinase inhibition assay
Tyrosinase inhibitory activity was determined spectrophotometrically in 96-well plates with a final volume of 200 μl. First, 50 mM PBS buffer pH 7.4 and 0.01 mM CuSO4 were mixed with 6 μg ml−1 of purified enzyme. Then, the mixture was incubated at 40 °C for 2 minutes. Finally, various concentrations of inhibitor were mixed with 1.2 mM L-tyrosine or 2 mM L-dopa and were added to the pre-incubated mixture. KA was studied in the range of 0.025–0.1 mM and HQ in the range of 0.025–0.5 mM. The reaction mixture was then monitored for L-dopachrome formation (ε = 3600M−1 cm−1) by measuring the absorbance at 475 nm. Specific activity was calculated as the ratio of the conversion rate and the total protein content as determined by the Bradford analysis method (Bio-Rad, Israel). All measurements were performed in seven replicates. The inhibitor concentration necessary for 50% inhibition (IC50) was determined with respect to a control (no inhibitor).
Kinetic analysis of tyrosinase
The mode of inhibition and inhibition parameters, i.e. the Michaelis–Menten constant (Km), maximal velocity (Vmax), turnover number (kcat) of TyrBm and the inhibition constants (KI, KIS) of each inhibitor were determined by Lineweaver–Burk plot analysis using various concentrations of L-tyrosine (0.03–1.4 mM) and L-dopa (0.15–2.0 mM) as substrates. The inhibitor concentrations were mentioned above. The inhibition kinetics module of Sigma Plot 13.0 software was used (Systat Software, Inc., Richmond, CA, USA). All measurements were performed in 5-replicates.
Tyrosinase activity assay on HQ as a substrate
TyrBm activity was determined by measuring the formation of 2-hydroxy-p-benzoquinone (HPB) from HQ, in the presence of H2O2 or L-dopa. TyrBm activity was determined as explained in the inhibition assay above with varying concentrations of H2O2, ranging from 0 to 90 mM, while maintaining the concentration of HQ constant. The formation of HBP was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 475 nm26.
The values of Km, Vmax and kcat of TyrBm in the presence of HQ as a substrate were determined with the following conditions: 50 mM PBS buffer pH 7.4, 0.01 mM CuSO4, 6 μg ml−1 of purified enzyme, various concentrations of HQ (0.1–2.0 mM) in the presence of saturating concentration of hydrogen peroxide (100 mM)51.
For further verification of TyrBm activity on HQ, the activity was determined by recording the oxygen consumption in the presence of L-dopa and HQ. Measurements were carried out using a Hansatech Oxygraph+ electrode (Norfolk, UK) in a reaction volume of 1000 μL. The reaction contained 4 μg ml−1 of purified TyrBm, 50 mM PBS buffer pH 7.4, 0.01 mM CuSO4, 1 mM L-dopa and 0.1 mM HQ.
Dissociation constants using MicroScale Thermophoresis (MST)
TyrBm was labeled fluorescently with a RED dye (NT-647-NHS) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (NanoTemper Technologies, Munich, Germany). Non-bound dye was removed by purification of the enzyme on a Sephadex G-25 column with buffers provided in the commercial kit. Then, serial dilutions of unlabeled binding partner samples (inhibitor or substrate) were mixed with 0.377 μM of dye-labeled TyrBm in 50 mM PBS buffer pH 7.4 and incubated for 5 minutes. Approximately 10 μl of sample was loaded into hydrophilic monolith NT capillaries and the measurement was performed in a NanoTemper Monolith NT.015T instrument. The emission of the red fluorescence was recorded at a focused location of the capillary. In the same location, a microscopic temperature gradient was created using an infrared laser and the fluorescence depletion was measured. According to changes in the fluorescent thermophoresis signal and the concentrations of unlabeled inhibitor, the dissociation constant values were determined by the NanoTemper analysis software. The unlabeled binding partners tested for KD determination were KA (0–4 mM), HQ (0–1 mM) and L-tyrosine (0–2 mM).
All experiments were performed in duplicates or triplicates in order to ensure the reproducibility of the results. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test: *P < 0.05 compared with the control. Data is summarized as mean ± SD.
Substrate binding in crystals
In order to trap ligands in the active site, mature crystals were soaked overnight in 1 mM of either CuSO4 or ZnCl2 and subsequently in 10 mM of the appropriate ligand (KA and HQ) before crystal freezing.
Data collection and structure determination
X-ray diffraction data was collected at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France, at beamlines ID14-4 and ID 29. All data were indexed, integrated, scaled and merged using Mosflm and Scala52. The structures of TyrBm with bound inhibitors were solved by molecular replacement using Phaser53 and the coordinates of earlier determined TyrBm structure (PDB code 4P6R). Refinement was performed using Phenix54 and Refmac555,56, coupled with rounds of manual model building, real-space refinement and structure validation performed using COOT57. Data collection, phasing and refinement statistics are presented in Table 3.
In silico simulations
Ligand migration sampling with Protein Energy Landscape Energy (PELE). PELE has widely been used to study ligand-protein interactions and protein dynamics at a fraction of the cost compared to other sampling methods such as molecular dynamics58,59,60. This algorithm is composed of a perturbation and a relaxation stage, and uses a mixture of random moves with protein structure prediction algorithms. The resulting structure is accepted or rejected following the Metropolis criterion.
Binding free energy with Markov State Models (MSM). MSM are coarse grain statistical models that allow extracting equilibrium properties such as the binding free energy61. In order to build our MSM, we split the conformational space using the Voronoi decomposition, clustering the ligand’s center of mass and using the cluster centers as seeds. Hence, each microstate will contain all possible ligand, protein and solvent arrangements compatible with having the ligand’s center of mass within the cell. In order to study the different metastable minima, microstates are kinetically clustered utilizing Perron Cluster Analysis (PCCA+). The absolute binding free energy, ∆G, is obtained integrating the potential of mean force (Gpmf) in the whole bound region39.
Accession codes: The coordinates and structure factors of TyrBm in different states have been deposited in the RCSB PDB under accession codes 5I3B (TyrBm with configuration B of HQ), 5I3A (TyrBm with configuration A of HQ) and 5I38 (TyrBm with KA).
How to cite this article: Deri, B. et al. The unravelling of the complex pattern of tyrosinase inhibition. Sci. Rep. 6, 34993; doi: 10.1038/srep34993 (2016).
This work was supported by the Israel Science Foundation founded by the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, grant number 419/15 and by the Gurwin Fund for Scientific Research. We also acknowledge the Russell-Berrie Nanotechnology Institute (RBNI) at the Technion for supporting this research. This research benefited from use of the Technion Center of Structural Biology facility of the Lorry I. Lokey Center for Life Sciences and Engineering. We thank the staff of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (beamlines ID14-4 and ID 29) for provision of synchrotron radiation facilities and assistance. V.G. would like to thank the OxiDesign Spanish project (CTQ2013-48287-R) and D.L. acknowledges support from the Spanish Severo Ochoa Program (SEV-2011-00067).
About this article
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences (2018)