The recent identification of “Side Population” (SP) cells in a number of unrelated human cancers has renewed interests in the hypothesis of cancer stem cells. Here we isolated SP cells from HepG2 cells and 18 of the 21 fresh hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissue samples. These SP cells have higher abilities of forming spheroids, invasion and migration. Tumors could generate only from SP, not non-SP (NSP), cells in a low dose of subcutaneous injection to the NOD/SCID mice (5 × 102 cells/mouse). The mRNA microarray analysis of the SP vs. NSP cells isolated from HepG2 cells revealed that the SP cells express higher levels of pluripotency- and stem cell-associated transcription factors including Klf4, NF-Ya, SALL4 and HMGA2. Some of the known hepatobiliary progenitor/stem cell markers, such as Sox9 was also up-regulated. RT-qPCR analysis of the gene expression between SP cells and NSP cells isolated from both HepG2 cells and HCC tissue samples showed that most of the tested mRNAs’ changes were in consistent with the microarray data, including the general progenitor/stem cells markers such as Klf4, NF-Ya, SALL4 and HMGA2, which were up-regulated in SP cells. Our data indicates that HCC cancer stem cells exist in HepG2 and HCC fresh tissue samples and can be isolated by SP assay.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in China. Hepatectomy has been considered as one of the curative treatments, but more than 40% of patients develop recurrences within one year after the operations1. The underlying mechanism of the recurrence with such a high incidence remains elusive, despite the fact that it is widely studied.
In traditional concept, every cell from tumors can act as a seed to form a new tumor independently. A recent idea about tumor biogenesis is cancer stem cells (CSCs). In the CSCs hypothesis, only a very small subpopulation of tumor cells—CSCs, can form new tumors, and they have some of the stemness properties which are nearly infinite self-renewal, extensive invasion and migration. With these properties, CSCs can resist hypoxia2, chemotherapies3, radiotherapies4, and immunization effects5. Different studies have revealed that many markers can be used to isolate hepatocellular cancer stem cells (HCSCs), such as CD906,7, CD448, CD1339, CD1310,11, EpCAM12. However, these markers are distinctive but not interrelated in different HCC cell lines.
Through adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette (ABC) membrane transporters, the so-called “Side Population” (SP) cells can efflux the DNA-binding dye Hoechst33342 and can be detected by flow cytometry13,14. SP cells sorting was initially applied to isolate hematopoietic stem cells and then used to enrich stem cell compartments in diverse tissues15,16. Recently, it has been proved to be enriched with CSCs in many tumors, and the method was also performed in some HCC cell lines17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24. However, it is not well explored in HCC cell line HepG2 and fresh tissues from HCC patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether the SP cells in HCC display the properties of HCSCs, and whether they express different genes from Non-SP (NSP) cells.
Isolation of SP cells in hepatocellular carcinoma cells
SP cells were detected in HCC cell line HepG2 and 18 of the 21 HCC fresh tissue samples. The percentage was 3.2% and 1.1–4.6%, respectively (Fig. 1A). SP cells was disappeared when verapamil, a calcium channel blocker was added (Fig. 1B). SP and NSP cells were sorted separately for further investigations. Stained with trypan blue, it demonstrated that the average alive cells were 72.4%, and there was no difference between the two groups in morphology (data not shown).
Cell proliferation abilities of the isolate SP cells
To investigate the in vitro proliferation abilities of SP and NSP cells, we performed MTT assy. At 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, 48 h, 60 h and 72 h after sorting, there was no significant (P > 0.05) cell viability difference between SP and NSP cells in HepG2 cells and in 16 fresh HCC tissue samples in medium supplemented with FBS (Fig. 2A). SP cells from the rest 2 fresh tissue samples showed slight higher proliferation at the 72 h time point after sorting (Fig. 2B,C).
SP cells can form tumorspheres in serum-free medium
It is well-known that most cells cannot survive and proliferate in serum-free medium, while stem cells can survive and form spheres, with some cell factors added to the serum-free medium. To investigate this property in different subpopulations of HCC tissue samples, we performed tumorsphere culture arrays on SP, NSP and unsorted cells of HCC fresh tissues. NSP cells could not form tumorsphere in DMEM/F12 supplemented with B27, EGF, bFGF (BD) and heparin. Actually most of the NSP cells could not survive after such a long time serum-free medium culture (9 days), and the remaining cells were connected loosely and could be blowed into single cells easily (Fig. 3B). However, SP cells and unsorted cells can form tumorspheres, and the tumorspheres from SP cells (Fig. 3A) were significantly more than that from unsorted cells (Fig. 3C,D; P < 0.05, n = 6).
SP cells has more invasion and migration ability in vitro
To examine the invasion and migration ability of SP and NSP cells sorted from HCC fresh tissues, we performed in vitro invasion assay and migration assay with transwell Boyden chambers, different in adding or not extracellular matrix (ECM) gel to the chambers. In vitro transwell cell invasion assay showed that SP cells (Fig. 4A) invaded more than NSP cells (Fig. 4C) with statistically significance (Fig. 4E; 19.67 ± 1.97 vs. 15.67 ± 2.58, F = 0.28, P < 0.05, n = 6). In vitro transwell cell migration assay showed that SP cells (Fig. 4B) migrated significantly more than NSP cells (Fig. 4D) with statistically significance (Fig. 4F; 86.33 ± 8.36 vs. 46.50 ± 7.58, F = 0.13, P < 0.05, n = 6).
SP cells produce tumors in vivo with low number of cells
To examine the difference in the tumorigenicity assay on mice between SP and NSP cells, low number (5 × 102/mouse) of SP cells from either HepG2 cells or HCC tissue samples were injected into NOD/SCID mice subcutaneously and tumor formation were examined ninety days after injection. In details, we prepared 19 groups of NOD/SCID mice with four mice in each group. In one group, three mice were injected with 500 SP cells (sorted from HepG2 cells) on the left back subcutaneous space, 500 NSP cells (sorted from HepG2 cells) on the right back subcutaneous space of the same three mice, and the remaining one mouse was injected with 1×106 (large number) unsorted HepG2 cells as positive control. In parallel, the SP and NSP cells sorted from 18 HCC patients’ tissues were tested in the remaining 18 groups of NOD/SCID mice, following the HepG2 cells injection regimen. Ninety days after injection, we observed tumors in 52 of 57 mice injected with SP cells, whereas all the mice injected with NSP cells did not generate any tumor (The detailed information were shown in Supplementary Table S1). Thereinto, all of the 3 mice injected with SP cells from HepG2 cells (Fig. 5A1) and most of the mice injected with SP cells from patient HCC tissue samples generated tumors (representative pictures were shown in Fig. 5B1). Tumors also developed in all of the 19 positive control mice (Fig. 5A4). Histological analysis of low number of SP cells originated tumors showed similar features to those from large number of unsorted cells (Fig. 5E–L). The diameters of the tumor mass generated from SP cells and unsorted cells injection were 2.13 ± 0.44 cm and 2.20 ± 0.28 cm respectively (The detailed information was shown in Supplementary Table S1). There is also no significant difference between these two groups (P > 0.05, n = 71).
SP cells express a primitive gene expression profile
To systematically investigate the difference of gene expression and taking into account the individual differences between tissue samples, we further used mRNA microarray to analyze SP and NSP cells sorted from HepG2. The microarray data showed that 2057 genes’ expression were up-regulated (ratio > 2.0) and 3189 down-regulated (ratio < 0.5) in SP cells comparing to NSP cells (Fig. 6B). The genes were functionally categorized using CapitalBio Molecule Annotation System V3.0 (Bioinfo, Beijing, China). Through a statistical comparison of the significantly differentiated GO (gene ontology) annotation between SP and NSP cells, we observed that SP cells were more closely (both in gene number and in percentage) involved in transcription (GO: 0006355/0006350, 231 genes, 17.9%), development (176 genes, 13.6%) and signal transduction (GO: 0007165, 158 genes, 12.2%) (Fig. 6C). Meanwhile, cell adhesion (GO: 0007155) also holds an important position in SP cells (data not shown). Intriguingly, microarray indicated that pluripotency and stem cell-associated transcription factors including Klf4, NF-Ya25, SALL426 and HMGA227 were up-regulated in SP cells compared to NSP cells. Meanwhile, some of the known hepatobiliary progenitor/stem cell markers, such as Sox928, and some of the key mediators of cell cycle progression such as CDC25A and CDC25C were also up-regulated. Whereas genes likely to be associated with development of cancer cachexia, such as ADAMTS1, and the key mediator of inflammatory response, such as IL1B, were down-regulated in SP cells (Table 1). We further verified some of the dys-regulated genes’ expression by RT-qPCR analysis between SP and NSP cells isolated from HepG2 cells (Table 1 and Fig. 6E), and also compared it with that from HCC tissue samples (data were shown in the Supplementary Table S2). The results showed that the general progenitor/stem cells markers such as Klf4, NF-Ya, SALL4 and HMGA2 were indeed up-regulated in SP cells from HCC tissue samples, the same as that from the HepG2 cells, and in consistent with the microarray data. In addition, immunofluorescence assay showed that the protein expression level changes between SP and NSP cells of some of the tested genes were also consistent with the microarray and RT-qPCR result, such as SALL4, CDCA2 and CDCA4 (Fig. 7). However, we did see some different mRNA expression between HCC tissue samples and HepG2 SP and NSP cells, such as SOX9. The reason for the difference between SP cells from HepG2 cells and HCC tissue samples could result from individual differences in patient tissue samples.
The nearly infinity capacity of proliferation, self-renew, and multipotential differentiation are the most characteristic properties of stem cells. By the hierarchical model of tumorgenesis, only subpopulation of the tumor cells that have some of the properties of stem cells, can generate tumor mass29,30. This subpopulation was named as CSCs, and was thought to be correlated with cancer recurrence and metastasis. In this study, HCC cell line HepG2 and fresh tissues of 21 HCC patients were sorted by flow cytometry to isolate SP cells and to estimate whether the SP cells show the properties of CSCs. SP cells were sorted and observed in HepG2 cells and 18 of the 21 HCC tissue samples. After sorting, we stained the cells with trypan blue and demonstrated more than 70% of the cells were alive. SP cells could then be used to further in vitro and in vivo investigations.
It has been reported that HCSCs can proliferate faster in cell line Huh7 and PLC/PRF/5, but it could be observed only at 72 h after plating and the ratio was not high17. In this study, we observed an almost identical capacity of proliferation in SP compared with NSP in the medium supplemented with FBS. In serum-free medium, we showed that SP cells could generate more tumorspheres than unsorted cells and NSP cells could not form tumorsphere. It is well-known that most CSCs are quiescent in cell cycle, as stem cells can divide symmetrically and asymmetrically21,31. The asymmetrical division indicates self-renew which can keep the quality and quantity of stem cells. Self-renew is supposed to be one of the reasons for CSCs to resist the harmful environment. Our study suggested that SP cells sorted from HepG2 and 18 of the 21 HCC tissue samples could not proliferate fast in total medium but could survive in medium without serum, indicating the property of CSCs, and thus the SP cells were enriched with HCSCs.
During the embryonic development, stem cells show higher migration ability and can migrate to distant organs with complex mechanisms32,33. It also has been suspected that tumor invasion and metastasis may be mediated by the CSCs subpopulation34. The migration and invasion ability of CSCs is higher than that of somatic cells. Our in vitro invasion and migration arrays clearly showed the disproportions between SP and NSP cells sorted from HepG2 and HCC tissues. Higher invasive and migratory phenotype of SP cells also revealed that they were enriched with CSCs. Through our research, we found that SP cells have some of the properties of CSCs: they can resist the adverse environment, they have more invasion and migration ability in vitro and produce tumor in vivo with low number of cells, but they do not show higher proliferation abilities compared to NSP cells.
Researches of tumor are currently placing emphasis on processes that are associated with developmental biology, specifically differentiation, embryonic signal transduction, and epigenetic regulation. According to the hierarchical model of cancer, carcinogenesis occurs when a stem cell acquires a mutation and initiates a stem cell-like counterpart35. Cancer cells heterogeneity is suspected to be related with CSCs’ proliferation, symmetrical or asymmetrical divisions, and differentiations36. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) expression in adults is often associated with hepatoma or teratoma. HCC cell line HepG2 is AFP positive, and different cells in HepG2 should equally express AFP at expectation. In our study, the expression of AFP in SP was 36.9 folds higher than that in NSP cells, suggesting that within the upstream, SP cells might lead to hierarchy of HCC cells.
In addition, our mRNA microarray analysis of HepG2 SP cells showed that they were enriched on MAPK, PPAR, Wnt, ErbB, VEGF signaling pathways, as well as focal adhesion and adherens junction, most of which are highly related to the properties of stem cells or CSCs. It has been reported that EGFR-mediated MAPK pathway reactivation leads to resistance to vemurafenib in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancers37. PAR-3-atypical protein kinase C can phosphorylate junctional adhesion molecule A to regulate cell-cell contact maturation, tight junctions38. Wnt is a signaling pathway made up of a complex network of proteins involved in embryogenesis, normal physiological processes and carcinogenesis39,40,41. RT-qPCR analysis of the gene expression between SP cells and NSP cells isolated from both HepG2 cells and HCC tissue samples showed that most of the tested mRNAs’ changes were in consistent with the microarray data. Undoubtedly, some RT-qPCR results did not consist with the microarray analysis, such as c-MYC, which is involved in cell proliferation and results in the formation of cancer. Previous studies have indicated that c-MYC plays a significant role in maintenance of glioma cancer stem cell and hematopoietic stem cell42,43. Although the microarray result showed the expression of c-MYC was down-regulated, our RT-qPCR analysis actually found that it was up-regulated in SP cells comparing to NSP cells, further demonstrating that SP cells in HCC display the properties of HCSCs. Moreover, as a transcriptional target of c-Myc, CDC25A showed up-regulated in SP cells through microarray analysis and RT-qPCR verification, which may contribute to cell cycle progression during differentiation44,45. We also found some different mRNA expression between HCC tissue samples and HepG2 SP and NSP cells, such as SOX9. The reason about the difference between SP cells from HepG2 cells and HCC tissues could result from individual differences in patient tissue samples. In our follow-up work, increasing our HCC patients’ sample in large number may increase the consistency and in the long run will be helpful to find some new therapy targets. In summary, SP assay might be a proper method to isolate CSCs in HCC, but the different gene expressions of SP cells should be further investigated in more cell lines and fresh tissue samples.
Materials and Methods
The HCC cell line HepG2, obtained from Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China), was cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone), 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin in a humidified incubator under 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Cells were detached from the dishes with Trypsin-EDTA (Hyclone) and blowed into single-cell suspensions before flow cytometry.
Primary HCC tissue samples were obtained from 21 patients undergoing surgical resection of primary HCC at Hepatic Surgical Department, Anhui Provincial Hospital, from January 2011 to July 2012. Sections were reviewed by two experienced pathologists to verify the histological assessment. All the specimens were hepatocellular cancer. Prior informed consent was obtained and all experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committees of the Anhui Provincial Hospital Clinical Research and University of Science and Technology of China. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, including any relevant details. Preparation of single-cell suspensions from HCC fresh specimens were performed in the C-tube of the gentle MACS Dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec, Cologne, Ger) added with HBSS, 3% FBS (Hyclone), and Trypsin-EDTA (Hyclone).
Side Population Sorting using Flow Cytometry
Single-cells from cell line HepG2 and fresh HCC tissues were suspended at 1 × 106/mL in DMEM medium (water bath at 37 °C beforehand). These cells were then incubated in water bath at 37 °C with 5 μg/mL Hoechst33342 (Sigma, StLouis, MO, USA) for 90 minutes, either alone or in the presence of 50 μg/mL verapamil (Sigma). After incubation, cells were centrifuged and suspended in HBSS at 4 °C. 1 μg/mL propidium iodide (BD, Pharmingen, SanDiego, CA) was added before the flow cytometry to distinguish the dead cells. Cell sorting was performed using an AriaII (BD) fluorescence activated cell sorting system (FACS). Hoechst33342 was excited with the UV laser at 375 nm and fluorescence emission was measured with 405/BP30 (Hoechst blue) and 570/BP20 (Hoechst red) optical filters. Propidium iodide was measured through the 630/BP30 filter.
Cell Proliferation Assay
Cell proliferation assays were performed with 3-(4,5dimeth-ylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazoliumbromide (MTT; Sigma). SP and NSP cells were seeded into a 96-well microplate at 1 × 103 in 200 μl of medium supplemented with 10% FBS per well and maintained in a humidified incubator under 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37 °C. 24, 48 and 72 hours after sorting, 10 μl of MTT was added into triplicate wells and incubated at 37 °C for another 4 h, 100 μl of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma) was added and surged for 10 min. Then absorbance at 540 nm was measured to calculate the number of vital cells in each well by micro-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plate reader.
Suspended SP, NSP and unsorted cells were seeded into 6-well ultra-low attachment plates (Corning, Acton, MA, USA) at 1.5 × 103 per well and cultured in serum-free DMEM/F12 (Hyclone) supplemented with B27 (Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), 20 ng/mL of EGF, 20 ng/mL of bFGF (BD) and 4 μg/mL of heparin (Sigma) as previously described46. After 9 days culture, wells were examined under an inverted microscope at ×200 magnification and the number of spheres in 9 fields of view was counted according to cell density per well.
In vitro Transwell Cell Invasion Assay and in vitro Transwell Cell Migration Assay
The in vitro invasion capacity of SP and NSP cells was assayed using a 48-Transwell Boyden Chamber unit (Neuroprobe, Inc.) as previously described47. A Boyden chamber was separated into two compartments by a polycarbonate membrane with an 8-mm pore, over which a thin layer of ECM was dried. The ECM layer occluded the membrane pores and blocked the noninvasive cells from migrating. To the top chamber, 1.5 × 103 SP or NSP cells in serum-free medium were added. In the lower chamber, DMEM with 10% FBS was added. After incubation at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 48 hours, the noninvasive cells were removed with a cotton swab. The cells that had migrated through and adhered to the lower surface of the membrane were fixed with methanol for ten minutes and stained with crystal violet solution (0.1%). For quantification, the cells were counted using a microscope from five randomized fields at ×200 magnification. In vitro Transwell cell migration assay was performed using a protocol similar to that used for the invasive assay described above, however, ECM layer was not added to the chamber, and 3 × 103 cells were added per chamber.
Non-obese Diabetic/Severe Combined Immunodeficiency mice (NOD/SCID) mice were purchased from Viatal River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd (Beijing, China). Prior informed consent was obtained and all experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committees of the Anhui Provincial Hospital Clinical Research and University of Science and Technology of China. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, including any relevant details. SP and NSP cells were suspended in 200 μl of DMEM and Matrigel (1:1) and respectively injected into the left and right back subcutaneous space of the male NOD/SCID mice (6 to 10 weeks old) under anesthesia (5 × 102 cells/mouse/side). Tumor formation was observed weekly for 13 weeks. Subcutaneous tumors were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections were subjected to hematoxylin-eosin staining. These experiments were performed in accordance with the institutional guidelines for the use of laboratory animals.
mRNA Microarray Analysis
Total RNA was extracted separately from SP and NSP cells using Trizol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA was further purified with NucleoSpin RNA clean-up (Macherey-Nagel, Ger). Microarray analysis was performed according to the standard protocol (Agilent Gene Chip Manual, Palo Alto, CA). First and second cDNA were generated from 1μg total RNA using T7 Oligo (dT) Primer, CbcScript kit, RNase H and DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen). The cRNA was then synthesized using the T7 Enzyme Mix (MN) and purified with the RNA Clean-up Kit (MN). Then cDNA was again generated from 5 μg cRNA using CbcScriptII, Random Prime and purified with PCR Nucleo Spin Extract II Kit (MN). The cDNA was labeled by Cy5-dCTP and Cy3-dCTP (GE Healthcare Cat. No. PA 55021/ PA53021) and then hybridized to human 8 × 60 k Gene Chip (Agilent). Array images were scanned using Agilent G2565CA Microarray Scanner and analyzed with Feature Extraction software. After experimental normalization, data mining including fold change measurement and categorization was conducted using GeneSpring system (Agilent).
Total RNA were extracted separately from of SP and NSP cells using Eastep TM Universal RNA Extraction Kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All qPCR reactions were performed in 10 ul volumes using AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Vazyme). Human GAPDH was used as reference gene.
All of the in vitro experiments were repeated at least three times. The data were expressed as means ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. The comparison of the incidence of tumor formation by in vivo mouse models was performed with Fisher’s exact test. All the analyses were performed using SPSS, version 10.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA) and tests were two-sided with a significance level <0.05.
For immunofluorescence, SP and NSP cells cells were seeded onto sterile, acid–treated 12 mm glass coverslips in 24-well plates (NEST) separately. In general, 12–18 hours after adherence, cells were rinsed for 1 min with pre-warmed PHEM buffer (100 mM PIPES, 20 Mm HEPES, pH 6.9, 5 mM EGTA, 2 Mm MgCl2 and 4 M glycerol) and permeabilized for 1 min with PHEM plus 0.1% Triton X-100. Extracted cells were fixed with freshly prepared 3.7% paraformaldehyde in PHEM for 5 min at room temperature. After rinsing three times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBST), cells on the coverslips were blocked with 1% BSA (Sango) in PBST for 30 min. These cells were incubated with the various primary antibodies in a humidified chamber for 1 hour at room temperature or for 12 hours at 4 °C and then washed three times in PBST. Primary antibodies (Proteintech) were visualized using Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody. DNA was stained with Hoechst 33342. Slides were examined under Olympus X71 Inverted fluorescence Microscope, and images were collected and analyzed with cellSens software.
Ethics Committees Statement
Prior informed consent that the experiments on live vertebrates and/or higher invertebrates were obtained and all experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committees of the Anhui Provincial Hospital Clinical Research and University of Science and Technology of China. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, including any relevant details.
How to cite this article: Xia, H. et al. Hepatocellular Carcinoma-propagating Cells are Detectable by Side Population Analysis and Possess an Expression Profile Reflective of a Primitive Origin. Sci. Rep. 6, 34856; doi: 10.1038/srep34856 (2016).
Fan, S. T. et al. Continuous improvement of survival outcomes of resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 20-year experience. Ann Surg. 253, 745–758, doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182111195 (2011).
Konopleva, M., Tabe, Y., Zeng, Z. & Andreeff, M. Therapeutic targeting of microenvironmental interactions in leukemia: mechanisms and approaches. Drug Resist Updat 12, 103–113, doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2009.06.001 (2009).
Rebucci, M. & Michiels, C. Molecular aspects of cancer cell resistance to chemotherapy. Biochem Pharmacol. 85, 1219–1226, doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.02.017 (2013).
Frosina, G. DNA repair and resistance of gliomas to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Mol Cancer Res. 7, 989–999, doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0030 (2009).
Cojoc, M., Mabert, K., Muders, M. H. & Dubrovska, A. A role for cancer stem cells in therapy resistance: cellular and molecular mechanisms. Semin Cancer Biol. 31, 16–27, doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.06.004 (2015).
Tomuleasa, C. et al. Isolation and characterization of hepatic cancer cells with stem-like properties from hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 19, 61–67 (2010).
Yang, Z. F. et al. Significance of CD90+ cancer stem cells in human liver cancer. Cancer Cell 13, 153–166, doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.01.013 (2008).
Lee, T. K., Castilho, A., Ma, S. & Ng, I. O. Liver cancer stem cells: implications for a new therapeutic target. Liver Int. 29, 955–965, doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02040.x (2009).
Piao, L. S. et al. CD133+ liver cancer stem cells modulate radioresistance in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 315, 129–137, doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.10.012 (2012).
Haraguchi, N. et al. CD13 is a therapeutic target in human liver cancer stem cells. J Clin Invest 120, 3326–3339, doi: 10.1172/JCI42550 (2010).
Kim, H. M. et al. Increased CD13 expression reduces reactive oxygen species, promoting survival of liver cancer stem cells via an epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like phenomenon. Ann Surg Oncol. 19 Suppl 3, S539–S548, doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2040-5 (2012).
Yamashita, T. et al. Discrete nature of EpCAM+ and CD90+ cancer stem cells in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 57, 1484–1497, doi: 10.1002/hep.26168 (2013).
Moti, N. et al. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma-propagating cells are detectable by side population analysis and possess an expression profile reflective of a primitive origin. Oncogene 34, 1843–1852, doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.112 (2015).
Christgen, M., Ballmaier, M., Lehmann, U. & Kreipe, H. Detection of putative cancer stem cells of the side population phenotype in human tumor cell cultures. Methods Mol Biol. 878, 201–215, doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-854-2_13 (2012).
Cillo, C., Sekaly, R. P., Magli, M. C. & Odartchenko, N. Early hemopoietic progenitor cells: direct measurement of cell cycle status. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 459, 150–161 (1985).
Uchida, N., Fujisaki, T., Eaves, A. C. & Eaves, C. J. Transplantable hematopoietic stem cells in human fetal liver have a CD34(+) side population (SP)phenotype. J Clin Invest 108, 1071–1077, doi: 10.1172/JCI13297 (2001).
Chiba, T. et al. Side population purified from hepatocellular carcinoma cells harbors cancer stem cell-like properties. Hepatology 44, 240–251, doi: 10.1002/hep.21227 (2006).
Chikazawa, N. et al. Inhibition of Wnt signaling pathway decreases chemotherapy-resistant side-population colon cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 30, 2041–2048 (2010).
Geng, S. et al. Isolation and identification of a distinct side population cancer cells in the human epidermal squamous cancer cell line A431. Arch Dermatol Res. 303, 181–189, doi: 10.1007/s00403-010-1100-1 (2011).
Hayashi, S., Fujita, K., Matsumoto, S., Akita, M. & Satomi, A. Isolation and identification of cancer stem cells from a side population of a human hepatoblastoma cell line, HuH-6 clone-5. Pediatr Surg Int. 27, 9–16, doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2719-x (2011).
Kamohara, Y. et al. The search for cancer stem cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 144, 119–124, doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.04.008 (2008).
Li, R. et al. MicroRNAs involved in neoplastic transformation of liver cancer stem cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 29, 169, doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-169 (2010).
Marquardt, J. U. et al. Human hepatic cancer stem cells are characterized by common stemness traits and diverse oncogenic pathways. Hepatology 54, 1031–1042, doi: 10.1002/hep.24454 (2011).
Schmuck, R. et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of side population of gastric cancer cell lines. Am J Pathol. 178, 1792–1804, doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.12.043 (2011).
Dolfini, D., Minuzzo, M., Pavesi, G. & Mantovani, R. The short isoform of NF-YA belongs to the embryonic stem cell transcription factor circuitry. Stem Cells 30, 2450–2459, doi: 10.1002/stem.1232 (2012).
Oishi, N., Yamashita, T. & Kaneko, S. Molecular biology of liver cancer stem cells. Liver Cancer 3, 71–84, doi: 10.1159/000343863 (2014).
Yamazaki, H. et al. Stem cell self-renewal factors Bmi1 and HMGA2 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: clues for diagnosis. Lab Invest 93, 1331–1338, doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2013.120 (2013).
Dorrell, C. et al. Prospective isolation of a bipotential clonogenic liver progenitor cell in adult mice. Genes Dev. 25, 1193–1203, doi: 10.1101/gad.2029411 (2011).
Scaffidi, P. & Misteli, T. In vitro generation of human cells with cancer stem cell properties. Nat Cell Biol. 13, 1051–1061, doi: 10.1038/ncb2308 (2011).
Chen, R. et al. A hierarchy of self-renewing tumor-initiating cell types in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 17, 362–375, doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.049 (2010).
Zhang, B. et al. Effective targeting of quiescent chronic myelogenous leukemia stem cells by histone deacetylase inhibitors in combination with imatinib mesylate. Cancer Cell 17, 427–442, doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.03.011 (2010).
Chou, S. & Lodish, H. F. Fetal liver hepatic progenitors are supportive stromal cells for hematopoietic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 7799–7804, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003586107 (2010).
Rollini, P., Faes-Van’t Hull, E., Kaiser, S., Kapp, U. & Leyvraz, S. Phenotypic and functional analysis of human fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells in culture. Stem Cells Dev. 16, 281–296, doi: 10.1089/scd.2006.0096 (2007).
Meng, F. et al. Functional analysis of microRNAs in human hepatocellular cancer stem cells. J Cell Mol Med. 16, 160–173, doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01282.x (2012).
Tang, D. G. Understanding cancer stem cell heterogeneity and plasticity. Cell Res 22, 457–472, doi: 10.1038/cr.2012.13 (2012).
Pece, S. et al. Biological and molecular heterogeneity of breast cancers correlates with their cancer stem cell content. Cell 140, 62–73, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.007 (2010).
Corcoran, R. B. et al. EGFR-mediated re-activation of MAPK signaling contributes to insensitivity of BRAF mutant colorectal cancers to RAF inhibition with vemurafenib. Cancer Discov. 2, 227–235, doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0341 (2012).
Iden, S. et al. aPKC phosphorylates JAM-A at Ser285 to promote cell contact maturation and tight junction formation. J Cell Biol. 196, 623–639, doi: 10.1083/jcb.201104143 (2012).
Vermeulen, L. et al. Wnt activity defines colon cancer stem cells and is regulated by the microenvironment. Nat Cell Biol. 12, 468–476, doi: 10.1038/ncb2048 (2010).
Wang, Y. et al. The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway is required for the development of leukemia stem cells in AML. Science 327, 1650–1653, doi: 10.1126/science.1186624 (2010).
Wei, J. et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is hyperactivated in systemic sclerosis and induces Smad-dependent fibrotic responses in mesenchymal cells. Arthritis Rheum 64, 2734–2745, doi: 10.1002/art.34424 (2012).
Laurenti, E. et al. Hematopoietic stem cell function and survival depend on c-Myc and N-Myc activity. Cell Stem Cell 3, 611–624, doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.09.005 (2008).
Wang, J. et al. c-Myc is required for maintenance of glioma cancer stem cells. PLoS One 3, e3769, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003769 (2008).
Tamir, A. et al. Stem cell factor inhibits erythroid differentiation by modulating the activity of G1-cyclin-dependent kinase complexes: a role for p27 in erythroid differentiation coupled G1 arrest. Cell Growth Differ. 11, 269–277 (2000).
Qiu, W. & Kassem, M. miR-141-3p inhibits human stromal (mesenchymal) stem cell proliferation and differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1843, 2114–2121, doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.06.004 (2014).
Dontu, G. et al. In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Genes Dev. 17, 1253–1270, doi: 10.1101/gad.1061803 (2003).
Garcia, M. G. et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma cells and their fibrotic microenvironment modulate bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell migration in vitro and in vivo. Mol Pharm. 8, 1538–1548, doi: 10.1021/mp200137c (2011).
We thank Dr. Sun, Rui (USTC) for providing the HepG2 cells. This study was supported by Anhui Province Science and Technology Platform Project (1206c0805035) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2070000051). X.S. is a recipient of the Young Thousand Talents program (KJ2070000026).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Xia, H., Cao, J., Li, Q. et al. Hepatocellular Carcinoma-propagating Cells are Detectable by Side Population Analysis and Possess an Expression Profile Reflective of a Primitive Origin. Sci Rep 6, 34856 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34856
This article is cited by
Co-regulatory Network of Oncosuppressor miRNAs and Transcription Factors for Pathology of Human Hepatic Cancer Stem Cells (HCSC)
Scientific Reports (2019)
CPEB1 mediates hepatocellular carcinoma cancer stemness and chemoresistance
Cell Death & Disease (2018)
Mouse models of hepatocellular carcinoma: an overview and highlights for immunotherapy research
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (2018)
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.