Abstract
A pn junction maintained at above ambient temperature can work as a heat engine, converting some of the supplied heat into electricity and rejecting entropy by interband emission. Such thermoradiative cells have potential to harvest lowgrade heat into electricity. By analyzing the entropy content of different spectral components of thermal radiation, we identify an approach to increase the efficiency of thermoradiative cells via spectrally selecting longwavelength photons for radiative exchange. Furthermore, we predict that the nearfield photon extraction by coupling photons generated from interband electronic transition to phonon polariton modes on the surface of a heat sink can increase the conversion efficiency as well as the power generation density, providing more opportunities to efficiently utilize terrestrial emission for clean energy. An ideal InSb thermoradiative cell can achieve a maximum efficiency and power density up to 20.4% and 327 Wm^{−2}, respectively, between a hot source at 500 K and a cold sink at 300 K. However, subbandgap and nonradiative losses will significantly degrade the cell performance.
Introduction
Lowgrade heat is omnipresent in industrial processes, vehicular engines, and power electronics^{1,2}. Many technologies such as solidstate thermoelectric energy conversion^{3,4,5}, organic Rankine cycles^{1,6}, and thermally regenerative electrochemical cycle^{7,8} are pursued to harvest energy from low temperature heat sources. Semiconductor pn junctions, on the other hand, have been used to harvest photons from high temperature heat sources to generate electricity, such as photovoltaic (PV) and thermophotovoltaic devices^{9,10,11,12,13,14,15}. In these devices, photons from external heat source enter the devices to generate electronhole pairs and carry in entropy. Entropy of the incoming photons and entropy generated in the energy conversion process will be carried away by photons emitted during radiative recombination and via heat rejected to the environment.
Recently, the potential of using a pn junction directly as a heat engine, coupling heat into the pn junction by conductive or convective heat transfer from a heat source and rejecting the entropy via thermal radiation, has been explored for harvesting low temperature heat sources. Theoretical limit of such a thermoradiative (TR) cell was analyzed using the ShockleyQueisser framework established for photovoltaic devices^{16}. This potential was demonstrated experimentally by Santhanam and Fan^{17}, although the achieved efficiency was low.
To improve the efficiency of such devices, understanding the working principle of a thermoradiative cell is required. We first start by reviewing the operation of a conventional PV cell. When a PV cell is illuminated by a hot source, such as the sun, the pn junction of the cell is driven out of equilibrium due to the radiative generation of excess electrons and holes. As shown in Fig. 1a, these excess electrons and holes flow towards the contacts on the ntype and ptype semiconductors, respectively. Under the opencircuit condition, the excess electrons raise the electron quasiFermi level in the ntype region and the excess holes lower the hole quasiFermi level in the ptype region. This leads to a quasiFermi level splitting, equivalently a positive open circuit voltage configuration in the pn junction. When connected to a load, a negative current, which is opposite to an externally forwardbiased diode, flows to the external load and leads to power generation. Hence, a PV cell works in the fourth quadrant in power generation mode while a forwardbiased diode works in the first quadrant.
In contrast, a thermoradiative cell is heated up to a higherthanenvironment temperature by a heat source. Thermally excited electrons in the ntype region and holes in the ptype region diffuse towards the space charge region and recombine radiatively. If the radiative recombination rate is faster than the radiative generation rate, more photons will be emitted from the cell than it receives from the ambient, resulting in a negative opencircuit voltage condition where a quasiFermi level difference is established in the pn junction (Fig. 1b). When a load is connected externally, electrons flow into the ntype region and holes flow into the ptype region. In this power generation mode, the TR cell works in the second quadrant, while an externally reverselybiased diode works in the third quadrant (Fig.1c).
Thermoradiative cell, as a heat engine, also needs to reject entropy carried in from the heat source as well as entropy generated in the device due to irreversible processes. To reject entropy to the environment, a thermoradiative cell relies on the outgoing photons from thermal emission. The idea of using photons to reject heat of a heat engine is recently explored by Byrnes et al.^{18}. aiming at using outer space as the heat sink, and a thermoradiative cell can be a candidate for this approach.
Since thermoradiative cells rely on photons to carry out entropy, an understanding of photon entropy flux is important. In this paper, we start with an entropy analysis of photon flux. Guided by the analysis, we evaluate the performance of the TR cell with a spectrallyselective surface to demonstrate the device efficiency enhancement when the cell emissive spectrum is chosen to be narrow and centered at low frequencies. However, the increased device efficiency is accompanied by the reduction of its power density. This is a common dilemma for any energy converter, from the ideal Carnot engine^{19} to photovoltaics^{9}, thermoelectrics^{20}, or thermophotovoltaics^{9,10,11}. To overcome this dilemma, we propose engineering radiative energy transfer between the thermally emissive engine and the heat sink via coupling the generated electronhole pairs to phonon polariton in the nearfield^{21,22}. The nearfield coupling enables both narrowband emission and a high enhancement of radiative energy transfer. The enhancement factor can be orders of magnitude higher than that of the farfield thermal emission^{21,22,23}.
Results
Entropy Analysis of Photon Radiation
A heat engine using radiation to reject entropy such as a thermoradiative cell^{16,17,18} has its efficiency bounded by the Carnot limit 1 − T_{c}/T_{h} due to the entropy generation caused by the imbalance of entropy flux between the heat conduction input, thermal emission, and light absorption from the environment. The origin of this imbalance is in the different amounts of entropy flux per unit energy in the processes of heat conduction (S/E = T^{−1}) and thermal radiation (S/E = 4/3T^{−1}, for the blackbody emitter)^{24,25,26}. The study of the entropy of photons have a long history^{24,25,26,27} and is well summarized in the book of Green^{9}. To reveal the fundamental differences in the entropy content between radiation and heat conduction, the frequency dependence of entropy flux per unit energy is plotted in Fig. 2b by using the following expressions for the spectral energy and entropy fluxes of radiation, respectively^{25,26,28}:
Here, E(ω) is the photon energy flux per unit angular frequency, S(ω) is the entropy flux per unit angular frequency, ε is the cooler surface emittance, is the photon density of states in a homogeneous bulk material with refractive index n, c is the speed of light, is the photon distribution function, ħ is the Planck constant, k_{B} is the Boltzmann constant, n is the ambient refractive index, ω is the frequency of photons, θ and ϕ are the polar angle and azimuthal angle in the spherical coordinates respectively, and μ = E_{fe} − E_{fh} is the chemical potential of emitted photons. It should be noted that the chemical potential can be established when electrons and holes reach quasiequilibrium among themselves to form quasiFermi levels for the electrons (E_{fe}) and holes (E_{fh})^{25,27}. The entropy flux per unit energy is normalized to the heat conduction limit (S/E = T^{−1}), which is plotted as the black dotted line. The total (integrated over the whole frequency spectrum and angular range) normalized entropy content of the blackbody radiation equals 4/3, and is shown as the black dashdot line.
Figure 2b provides a clue to increasing the converter efficiency via judicious choice of the channels to deliver the energy to the engine and to dump the excessive entropy to the environment. Heat conduction or high frequency radiation carry the lowest entropy content per unit energy, and thus are the most favorable forms of energy for the engine input. As work (W) carries zero entropy, the excessive entropy must be rejected to the heat sink. As illustrated in Fig. 2b, the best form of energy to maximize the entropy removal from the engine is lowfrequency emission, which is characterized by the high entropy flux per unit energy. To verify this observation, we calculated the upper limit or the second law efficiency (η_{2nd}) for an engine, as shown in Fig. 2a, using heat conduction as the energy input channel (with the entropy content ) and the thermal emission with a frequencyselective surface as entropydumping channel (with the entropy content (S_{e} − S_{c})/(E_{e} − E_{c})) under the best scenario where no entropy is generated in the engine (S_{gen} = 0).
It is known that entropy can be generated during emission and absorption processes^{9}. This entropy generation, however, is not intrinsic and depends on the specific process. For example, the entropy generation can be reduced when the emitted photons acquire a chemical potential and vanishes when an ideal infinite junction solar cell works at open circuit condition^{9}. As shown in Fig. 2b, the selective surface only allows emission within a narrow spectral window with a bandwidth of Δħω and completely blocks emission of photons outside this window (i.e., ε(ħω) = 1 within the window and ε(ħω) = 0 elsewhere, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 2b). The engine efficiency is plotted with varying lower bounds (ħω_{c}) of the band pass window. Given Δħω = 0.01 eV and S_{gen} = 0, Fig. 2c clearly shows that the second law efficiency can be enhanced when photon emission is selected to radiate out at low frequency.
Principle of the thermoradiative cell
As shown Fig. 1, a thermoradiative cell is thermally driven out of equilibrium, generating a reversebias condition due to emitting more photons than received from the environment so that the electrons and holes are collected by contacts on the ptype and ntype semiconductors, respectively. When an external load is connected to the TR cell, the thermally excited electrons and holes flow from ntype and ptype regions, respectively, and contribute to the current (I). The power (W = −μI) can then be generated by the TR cell at a given temperature and calculated from the equation of current (I) continuity using the following expression^{16}:
where
where chemical potential of photons (μ = E_{fe} − E_{fh} < 0)^{27}. The TR cell efficiency (η) can then be calculated as η = W/E_{h}, where and E(ω) is integrated using Eq. (1).
We used Eqs (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) to calculate the characteristics of a TR cell with a band gap (E_{g}) of 0.1 eV, the cell temperature T_{H} = 500 K, and the ambient temperature T_{C} = 300 K. The efficiency and the power density (black dotted line in Fig. 3a) are shown for various chemical potentials of the TR cell, under the assumption that the emission only occurs as a result of the interband radiative recombination process. The TR cell emission spectra at different temperatures and voltages for this situation are plotted in Fig. 3b. The resulting device efficiency (Fig. 3a) has been previously defined by Strandberg^{16} as the TR cell limit. By comparing the curves in Fig. 3a, we can observe that the maximum efficiency point (MEP) does not correspond to the same value of the chemical potential as the maximum power density point (MPP) due to the reason that the energy input of heat conduction also adjusts under different voltages as shown in Fig. 3c. In particular, the maximum efficiency is achieved when the power density is decreasing. Furthermore, the maximum TR cell efficiency is far below the Carnot efficiency limit 1 − T_{c}/T_{h}.
As we predicted based on the entropy analysis illustrated in Fig. 2a, the TR cell efficiency can be enhanced in the situation when its emission is highly spectrally selected to be narrowband and dominated by low frequency photons. Figure 3a also shows the calculated results when the emission window of a TR cell are limited to Δħω = 0.1 eV and Δħω = 0.01 eV above the band gap. We used these spectral windows to calculate characteristics of the TR cell with the spectrallyselective emission. Our data show that when low frequency photons dominate the emission spectrum, the maximum efficiency is increased and close to the 1 − T_{c}/T_{h} Carnot limit (red dashed line and blue solid line in Fig. 3a). However, the maximum power density generated by the cell with the narrowband frequencyselective emittance decreases as the spectral window width is reduced (red dashed line and blue solid lines in Fig. 3a), resulting in the lower entropy generation as shown in Fig. 3d.
Based on the comparison between the efficiency and power density curves in Fig. 3a, we can better quantify the TR cell performance by replotting these two values together, as shown in Fig. 4. The powerefficiency curves begin at origin under zero chemical potential, corresponding to short circuit condition. When a load is connected, a negative voltage is biased on the load. As the magnitude of the voltage increases, the power density first increases and approaches the maximum power density point. Upon passing this point, the power starts to decrease but the efficiency keeps increasing until it reaches the maximum efficiency value. Finally, the curve folds and returns back to the origin due to a decreasing current. For the widths of the emission spectral window of Δħω = ∞, Δħω = 0.1 eV, and Δħω = 0.01 eV, the powerefficiency curves are shown in Fig. 4 as black dashed line, red narrow solid line, and blue solid line, respectively. The maximum efficiency can be clearly observed to be increasing with the shrinking spectral width of the emission window, but the power density is reduced.
The drop of power density stems from the reduced amount of emitted photons through a narrowband radiative channel. This imposes a limitation on the performance of the TR cell, when its thermal emission operates in the far field. However, it has already been demonstrated both theoretically^{10,29} and experimentally^{21,22} that the radiative power flux can be increased within a narrow spectral range by orders of magnitude if the emitter and the heat sink are electromagnetically coupled at a small gap distance through the nearfield. To roughly estimate the effect of such enhancement, we introduced an enhancement factor (β) to emulate the nearfield radiation within a narrow spectral window of Δħω (i.e., outside the emission window). The expressions for the first and second law in Fig. 2a can then be modified as:
The powerefficiency curves for a TR cell with enhancement factors β = 15 and β = 30, restricted by the emission spectral window width Δħω = 0.01 eV and operating at temperature T_{e} = 500 K, are shown as blue dotted line and blue dashdot lines in Fig. 4. Comparison of the curve for the same cell without nearfield enhancement (β = 1, solid blue line in Fig. 4) reveals opportunities to operate TR cells at high efficiency and high power density simultaneously.
Nearfield thinfilm thermoradiative cell
To further test our hypothesis, we built a detailed numerical model of a nearfield enhanced TR cell. The nearfield enhanced TR system consists of a thinfilm TR cell and a semiinfinite radiation extractor (heat sink), which exchange radiative energy through a narrow vacuum gap. The choice of a thinfilm TR cell stems from minimizing the electronic loss through the nonradiative processes, which will be discussed later, and the optical constants including InSb and CaCO_{3} and thicknessdependent results are shown in the supplementary material^{31,32,33,34}. In order to utilize the enhanced and narrowband nearfield radiative energy transfer between the TR cell and the heat sink, the gap distance (g) should be on the order of or smaller than the dominant emission wavelength^{10,21,22,30}. The submicron gap distance can enable efficient coupling of photons generated by the radiative recombination process in the TR cell with the phonon polariton on the surface of the radiation extractor (i.e., heat sink). Typically, phonon polariton modes have resonant frequencies below 0.2 eV, e.g., 0.186 eV (~6.7 μm) for CaCO_{3} and 0.138 eV (~9 μm) for SiO_{2}^{21,30}. On the other hand, InSb with a band gap of 0.17 eV at room temperature^{32} is a semiconductor material commonly used to make narrowgap PV cells and infrared detectors^{33,34}. The phonon polariton mode of CaCO_{3} has resonant frequency slightly higher than the band gap of InSb. It allows the phonon polariton coupling to electrons through the interband transition to direct extract the luminescent emission, making CaCO_{3} material a good candidate for the narrowband nearfield radiative extractor. Other materials are also possible to be used as nearfield radiative extractors, including materials supporting surface plasmons polaritons^{35}.
To compare the performance of TR cells under various scenarios of radiative energy extraction, we calculate the powerefficiency curves for several systems, including: (i) the InSb thin film cell (Fig. 5a), (ii) the InSb thin film with a spectrallyselective surface (Fig. 5b), and (iii) the InSb thin film with the adjacent CaCO_{3} acting as the nearfield radiative extractor (Fig. 5c). First, we calculate an ultimate limit of the device efficiency and power density assuming that the radiative process through the interband transitions is the only mechanism of radiative energy extraction (ideal case). Such an assumption corresponds to the celebrated ShockleyQueisser efficiency limit for photovoltaic cells^{36}. In Fig. 5d, the limiting powerefficiency curves are compared for the three systems. The energy carried away from the cell by photons with frequencies below the band gap energy (subbandgap loss) and the nonradiative generation of free carriers via Auger, ShockleyReadHall, and surface defect processes (nonradiative loss) are the two major loss mechanisms in a realistic system, and their impacts on the device performance will be discussed later.
First, to calculate the emission spectrum of a 50nmthick InSb thin film (Fig. 5a), which is close to the optimal thickness for each of the three configurations (see the thickness dependent results in the supplementary material), we used the transfer matrix method^{37} to rigorously solve Maxwell equations to find the surface emittance, ε(ω). The TR cell is assumed to have a perfect metal mirror as a backside reflector. The emittance was then averaged over the total angular range from 0 to 90°, and over the two orthogonal (transverse electric and magnetic) polarizations of emitted photons using Eqs (1) and (2). Finally, using Eqs (4) and (5), the power and efficiency were calculated and plotted together as a black solid curve in Fig. 5d. The emission spectrum of the InSb thin film with a spectrallyselective surface is plotted in Fig. 5b. It can be seen by comparing Fig. 5a,b that not only the spectrum bandwidth but also the peak emission power flux significantly decreases for the TR cell with the selective surface. As a result, the device current density and power drop, but the efficiency increases as expected, shifting the powerefficiency curve to the region of low power density and high efficiency (red solid line in Fig. 5d).
The spectrum of the nearfield radiative energy transfer from the InSb thin film to a bulk CaCO_{3} is narrowband and over two orders of magnitude enhanced in intensity over its farfield counterpart. Importantly, most of the photons contributing to the radiative heat flux have energy greater than the InSb bandgap energy. As such, they can significantly enhance N(T_{e}, μ) in Eq. (4), yielding high current and high power density of the TR cell. To calculate the nearfield energy transfer from a thin film to a bulk medium via a narrow gap, a rigorous analytical electromagnetic formulation based on Rytov theory is used^{38}. The thermally emitting object is modeled as a volume of fluctuating dipole sources, whose amplitudes are determined via the fluctuation dissipation theorem^{10,30,38,39,40,41}. The detailed formulas can be found in the supplementary material and refs. 10 and 35. To generate the plots in Fig. 5c, the radiative energy transfer from a 50nmthick InSb thin film to a bulk CaCO_{3} was calculated for a gap distance (g) of 10 nm. A narrowband and enhanced radiative energy transfer can be observed, peaking at the phononpolariton resonance wavelength of 6.7 μm as shown in Fig. 5c. As a result, the TR cell powerefficiency curve extends to the regions of both high power and high efficiency, which offers opportunities to efficiently harvest lowgrade heat into electricity.
Although the nearfield emission of the TR cell, using the coupling of the phonon polariton mode in the heat sink, can provide the narrowband and intensityenhanced features, it may also introduce additional losses into the system, such as subbandgap emission losses. The subbandgap emission can also strongly couple to phononpolariton modes in the heat sink, leading to its heating and thus to degrading the efficiency of the TR system. For the case of the nearfield radiative energy transfer between the InSb cell and CaCO_{3} extractor, lowenergy phonon polariton modes with wavelengths of 28 μm in CaCO_{3} can contribute to the subbandgap losses. These losses are manifested as additional lowfrequency peaks in the nearfield heat flux spectrum in Fig. 6a.
The data in Fig. 6a show that there is a tradeoff between increasing the abovebandgap emission and reducing the subbandgap losses. The best coupling configuration can be found by optimizing the thickness of the TR cell and the width of the vacuum gap between the cell and the extractor. We included the subbandgap loss mechanism into our nearfield heat transfer model and calculated the system performance as a function of the vacuum gap distance (g) between the TR cell and heat extractor (Fig. 6b,c). We observe that the maximum efficiencies are reduced from the ideal cases when the subbandgap losses are taken into account (compare blue plots to brown plots in Fig. 6b). However, the corresponding power densities increase as shown in Fig. 6c due to the mismatch of the maximum efficiency point and the maximum power point.
Discussion
Effect of NonRadiative Losses
Furthermore, realistic models of TR cells should include nonradiative losses. The nonradiative processes (Auger, ShockleyReadHall, and surface defects processes) contribute to the net free carrier generation in the TR cell and provide an additional loss mechanism in a realistic system. To account for the losses due to the Auger and ShockleyReadHall (SRH) processes, their rates need to be included in current continuity equation^{42,43}:
where q is the elementary charge, the G_{rad}, G_{Auger}, and G_{SRH} are the free carrier generation rates for radiative, Auger, and ShockleyReadHall processes respectively, and the R_{rad}, R_{Auger}, and R_{SRH} are the free carrier recombination rates for radiative, Auger, and ShockleyReadHall processes respectively. Typically, the ShockleyReadHall process is neglected in InSb due to its slow rate compared to the radiative and Auger processes^{44,45,46}. To account for the surface defect recombination process, the current continuity equation needs to be solved together with the Poisson and driftdiffusion equations to calculate the net free carrier generation rate (see supplementary material). After incorporating both subbandgap and nonradiative losses in InSb into our model, we observe that both efficiencies and power densities drop by orders of magnitude relative to their counterparts for the system with only radiative and subbandgap losses (compare yellow plots to brown plots in Fig. 6b,c). However, both efficiency and power density increase with the narrowing gap distance (Fig. 6b,c).
To provide guidelines for performance improvement of realistic TR cells, we need to identify the process that dominates the net generation of free carriers and contributes to the major energy loss. In Fig. 7a, the net rate of the interband radiative process and the net generation rates of the Auger and surface defect processes are calculated for varying gap distances. All rates are increased for smaller gap distances, but the radiative recombination rate increases faster than nonradiative generation rate, resulting in the increase of power density and efficiency. Obviously, the Auger process is characterized by a much faster rate than the surface defect process, and thus it dominates the energy loss through the free carrier generation. For the InSb, the ratio (m) of the radiative rate to the nonradiative rate (including both Auger and surface defect rates), m = radiative rate/Auger rate + surface defect rate, is calculated around 2~2.5 at each gap distance. If the suppression of Auger process can be achieved in either InSb or another material to improve this ratio to m > 4, the major loss through nonradiative generation can be significantly reduced. As a result, the device efficiency can be increased by more than three orders of magnitude (Fig. 7b). The ongoing research efforts to suppress the Auger process using quantum wells^{47}, doping profile control^{48}, superlattices^{49}, or heterostructures^{50}, can yield performance improvement of TR cells.
Conclusion
To summarize, we predict that the efficiency of thermoradiative (TR) cells can be dramatically improved if they are engineered to selectively emit only lowfrequency photons. This prediction is based on a theoretical analysis of the entropy content of high and lowfrequency radiation. Spectral selectivity of farfield emission can be achieved by introducing a selective surface, which boosts the efficiency of a TR cell but abate the power density due to the reduced emission and a lower radiative recombination rate. This work show that nearfield radiative energy transfer between the TR cell and the heat sink, which is enhanced by resonant coupling between electron interband transition on the hot side and phonon polariton modes on the cold side, can simultaneously yield both high efficiency and high power density, offering opportunities to efficiently harvest lowgrade heat. However, the subbandgap radiation losses and the nonradiative losses, especially due to the Auger process, may degrade the performance of TR cells significantly. For example, in a realistic system composed of a 50nmthick InSb TR cell at 500 K and a CaCO_{3} heat sink at 300 K coupled via a 10nm vacuum gap, the performance of this TR system can be improved from 2.4 × 10^{−5}% and 10^{−5} Wm^{−2} (farfield) to 0.5% and 45.16 Wm^{−2} (nearfield at 10 nm gap distance). Under this configuration, the ratio of the radiative rate to the nonradiative rate is calculated around 2, which causes to significant nonradiative losses. Provided the subbandgap radiation loss can be eliminated, the performance can further achieve 20.4% and 327 Wm^{−2} from 2.5% and 161 Wm^{−2}, when the nonradiativetoradiative ratio is improved from 2 to 15.3.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Hsu, W.C. et al. Entropic and NearField Improvements of Thermoradiative Cells. Sci. Rep. 6, 34837; doi: 10.1038/srep34837 (2016).
References
Chu, S. & Majumdar, A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 488, 294–303 (2012).
Rattner, A. S. & Garimella, S. Energy harvesting, reuse, and upgrade to reduce primary energy usage in the USA. Energy 36, 6172–6183 (2011).
Zebarjadi, M. et al. Perspectives on thermoelectrics: From fundamentals to device applications. Energy & Environmental Science 5, 5147–5162 (2012).
Biswas., K. et al. Highperformance bulk thermoelectrics with allscale hierarchical architectures. Nature, 489, 414–418 (2012).
Poudel B. et al. Highthermoelectric performance of nanostructured bismuth antimony telluride bulk alloys. Science, 320, 634–638 (2008).
Tchanche, B. F., Lambrinos, G., Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G. Lowgrade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 15, 3963–3979 (2011).
Yang, Y. et al. Chargingfree electrochemical system for harvesting lowgrade thermal energy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111, 17011–17016 (2014).
Lee, S. W. et al. An electrochemical system for efficiently harvesting lowgrade heat energy. Nat. Commun. 5, 3942 (2014).
Green, M. A. et al. Third generation photovoltaics Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York (2003).
Tong, J. K. et al. Thinfilm “thermal well” emitters and absorbers for highefficiency thermophotovoltaics. Scientific Reports 5, 10661 (2015).
Lenert, A. et al. A nanophotonic solar thermophotovoltaic device. Nature Nanotechnology 9, 126–130 (2014).
Branham, M. S. et al. 15.7% Efficient 10μmThick Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells Using Periodic Nanostructures. Advanced Materials 27, 2182 (2015).
Branham, M. S. et al. Empirical Comparison of Random and Periodic LightTrapping Structures for Ultrathin Silicon Photovoltaics. Advanced Optical Materials, online (2016).
Hsu, W.C. et al. Mismatched Front and Back Gratings for Optimum Light Trapping in Thin Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells. Optics Communication 377, 52–58 (2016).
Weinstein, L. A. et al. Enhanced Absorption of ThinFilm Photovoltaic Cells Using An Optical Cavity. Journal of Optics 17, 055901 (2015).
Strandberg, R. Theoretical efficiency limits for thermoradiative energy conversion. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 055105 (2015).
Santhanam, P. & Fan, S. Thermaltoelectrical energy conversion by diodes under negative illumination. Phys. Rev. B 93, 161410 (2016).
Byrnes, S. J., Blanchard, R. & Capasso, F. Harvesting renewable energy from earth’s midinfrared emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111, 3927–3932 (2014).
Kittel, C. & Kroemer, H. Thermal Physics, 2^{nd} Ed. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco (1980).
Humphrey, T. E. & Linke, H. Reversible thermoelectric nanomaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 096601 (2005).
Shen, S., Narayanaswamy, A. & Chen, G. Surface phonon polariton mediated energy transfer between nanoscale gaps. Nano Letters 9, 2909–2913 (2009).
Kim, K. et al. Radiative heat transfer in the extreme near field. Nature 528, 387–391 (2015).
BenAbdallah, P., Belarouci, A., Frechette, L. & Biehs, S.A. Heat flux splitter for nearfield thermal radiation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 053109 (2015).
Boriskina, S. V. et al. Roadmap on optical energy conversion. J. Optics 18, 073004 (2016).
Boriskina, S. V. et al. Heat meets light on the nanoscale, Nanophotonics 5, 134–160 (2016).
Landsberg, P. T. & Tonge, G. Thermodynamic energy conversion efficiencies. J. Appl. Phys. 51, R1–R20 (1980).
Wurfel., P. The chemical potential of radiation. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 15, 3967–3985 (1982).
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. Statistical Physics 3^{rd} ed. Elsevier, Oxford (1980).
Latella, I. et al. Heat engine driven by photon tunneling in manybody systems. Phys. Rev. Appl. 4, 011001 (2015).
Chiloyan, V., Garg, J., Esfarjani, K. & Chen, G. Transition from nearfield thermal radiation to phonon heat conduction at subnanometre gaps. Nature Communications 6, 6755 (2015).
Long, L. L., Querry, M. R., Bell, R. J. & Alexander, R. W. Optical properties of calcite and Gypsum in crystalline and powdered form in the infrared and farinfrared. Infrared Phys. 34, 191–201 (1993).
Littler, C. L. & Seiler, D. G. Temperature dependence of the energy gap of InSb using nonlinear optical techniques. Appl. Phys. Lett. 46, 986–988 (1985).
Khan, M. I., Wang, X., Bozhilov, K. N. & Ozkan, C. S. Templated fabrication of InSb Nanowires for nanoelectronics. J. Nanomaterials 2008, 698759 (2008).
Kruse, P. W. Indium antimonide photoelectromagnetic infrared detector. J. Appl. Phys. 30, 770 (1959).
Boriskina, S. et al. Enhancement and tunability of nearfield radiative heat transfer mediated by surface plasmon polaritons in thin plasmonic films. Photonics 2, 659–683 (2015).
Shockley, W. & Queisser, H. J. Detailed balance limit of efficiency of pn junction solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 510–519 (1961).
Chen, G. Nanoscale Energy Transport and Conversion.Oxford, New York, 2005.
Rytov, S. M., Kravtsov, Y. A. & Tatarskii, V. I. Principles of statistical radiophysics 3: elements of random fields SpringerVerlag Berlin: Heidelberg, (1989).
Biehs, S.A., Tschikin, M., Messina, R. & BenAbdallah, P. SuperPlankian nearfield thermal emission with phononpolaritonic hyperbolic metamaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 131106 (2013).
Tschikin, M., BenAbdallah, P. & Biehs, S. A. Coherent thermal conductance of 1D photonic crystals. Physics Letters A 376, 3462–3465 (2012).
Francoeur, M., Mengüç, M. P. & Vaillon, R. Solution of nearfield thermal radiation in onedimensional layered media using dyadic Green’s functions and the scattering matrix method. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer. 110, 2002–2018 (2009).
Sze, S. M. & Ng, K. K. Physics of Semiconductor Devices 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NJ pp 164, 682 (2007).
del Alamo, J. A. Integrated Microelectronic Devices: Physics and Modeling. Prentice Hall (2013).
Fauchet, P. M. The Auger rate in highly excited indium antimonide. Phys. Stat. Sol. 110, K11–K15 (1982).
Marchetti, S. M. & Simili, R. The InSb Auger recombination coefficient derived from the IRFIR dynamical plasma reflectivity. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 13, 7363–7369 (2001).
Rode, D. L. Electron Transport in InSb, InAs, and InP. Phys. Rev. B 3, 3287–3299 (1971).
Cragg, G. E. & Efros, A. L. Suppression of Auger processes in confined structures. Nano Lett. 10, 313–317 (2010).
Emelie, P. Y. et al. Modeling of LWIR HgCdTe Augersuppressed infrared photodiodes under nonequilibrium operation. J. Electronic Materials 37, 1362–1368 (2008).
Pidgeon, C. R., Ciesla, C. M. & Murdin, B. N. Suppression of nonradiative processes in semiconductor midinfrared emitters and detectors. Prog. Quant. Electr. 21, 361–419 (1998).
Itsuno, A. M., Phillips, J. D. & Velicu, S. Predicted performance improvement of Augersuppressed HgCdTe photodiodes and pn heterojunction detectors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 58, 501–507 (2011).
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful discussions with Professor Nicholas X. Fang and Professor Jesus A. del Alamo, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA. This work is support in part by DOE BES (DEFG0202ER45977) (near field radiation, W.C.H., J.K.T., Y. H. and G.C.) and by DOE BES EFRC (S3TEC) under DESC0001299/DEFG0209ER46577 (for heat to electrical energy conversion, B.L., S.V.B. and G.C.)
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
W.C.H. came up with the idea to use lowfrequency photons and nearfield radiation to improve thermoradiative cells. W.C.H., J.K.T., B.L., Y.H., S.V.B. and G.C. contribute to numerical calculations, results discussion, and paper writing. S.B. and G.C. supervised this project.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Hsu, WC., Tong, J., Liao, B. et al. Entropic and NearField Improvements of Thermoradiative Cells. Sci Rep 6, 34837 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34837
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Thermodynamic limits for simultaneous energy harvesting from the hot sun and cold outer space
Light: Science & Applications (2020)

Thermoradiative Cells Based on a ptype Cu3SbSe4 Semiconductor: Application of a Detailed Balance Model
Journal of Electronic Materials (2019)

Nearfield radiative thermoelectric energy converters: a review
Frontiers in Energy (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.