Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A role for the asexual spores in infection of Fraxinus excelsior by the ash-dieback fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus


The invasive pathogen, ash dieback fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, is spreading rapidly across Europe. It shows high levels of outcrossing and limited population structure, even at the epidemic front. The anamorphic (asexual) form produces prolific conidia, thought to function solely as spermatia (male gametes), facilitating gene flow between sympatric strains. Here, we show that conidia are capable of germination on ash leaves and in vitro, and can infect seedlings via leaves or soil. In leaves, germlings form structures resembling fruiting bodies. Additionally, H. fraxineus colonises ash debris and grows in soil in the absence of ash tissues. We propose an amended life-cycle in which wind-dispersed, insect-vectored or water-spread conidia infect ash and may sporulate in planta, as well as in forest debris. This amplifies inoculum levels of different strains in ash stands. In combination with their function as spermatia, conidia thus act to maximise gene flow between sympatric strains, including those originally present at low inoculum. Such mixing increases evolutionary potential, as well as enhancing the likelihood of gene introgression from closely-related strains or assimilation of further genetic diversity from parental Asian populations. This scenario increases the adaptability of H. fraxineus to new climates and, indeed, onto new host species.


The ascomycete fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus1 is the causal agent of ash dieback2. This disease is currently destroying ash trees across Europe3,4,5. First observed in Poland in 19923, it has now spread to more than 25 European countries6. This pathogen is aggressive7, causing leaf necrosis, premature leaf drop, shoot wilting and crown dieback, as well as necrotic lesions on petioles, stems and root collars7. Mortality is high in infected seedlings, whilst older trees develop chronic infections which are often eventually fatal (e.g. ref. 8). The loss of trees has a significant ecological and economic impact9, as ash is an important tree of mature woodland and hedgerows, as well as yielding commercial timber10,11.

Hymenoscyphus fraxineus is pleiomorphic; the anamorph (previously Chalara fraxinea12) produces prolific asexual spores13,14. However, these conidia have not been thought to have a role in the spread of the fungus, being described as “sticky”3,15 and unlikely to become airborne. They are instead assumed to act as spermatia13,16 during ascospore formation by the teleomorph (previously H. pseudoalbidus17). This hypothesis is supported by the discovery that ascospores derived from individual apothecia show levels of genetic polymorphism indicative of multiple mating partners13,14 and by the observation that the anamorph sporulates at the edge of the pseudosclerotial plate from which the apothecia emerge18.

Evidence suggests that sexual reproduction is of key importance the spread of H. fraxineus, a heterothallic fungus13. Population genetic studies have found high intra-population variability, along with little inter-population variability19 and a lack of population genetic structure14,20,21,22,23,24 across the entire continent of Europe. These data indicate high gene flow between populations, consistent with a high rate of outcrossing14. Indeed, while clear evidence of a founder effect can be seen when comparing the genotypes of the invasive pathogen populations in Europe with the much more variable genotypes displayed by native H. fraxineus populations in Asia, no such founder effect has been detected in the study of newly-discovered populations at the epidemic front19. The closely-related species, Hymenoscyphus albidus, a non-pathogenic saprophyte on ash debris25,26, is being displaced and is facing local extirpation in regions colonised by H. fraxineus27,28. H. albidus is homothallic and lacks an anamorphic stage29. As such, the invasive H. fraxineus may have an advantage over H. albidus, due to a greater adaptive potential.

The current best model for the disease cycle of H. fraxineus proposes that ash leaves are infected by wind-dispersed ascospores5,13,15. These spores are known to travel up to 50 metres15 and their long distance dispersal over kilometres is inferred from population genetics13. Ascospores germinate on leaves and invade the vascular tissue2,30. Some hyphae progress into the stem via the petiole, causing bark lesions, although this is relatively rare31. Infected leaves drop to the forest floor in autumn, where pseudosclerotial plates form on rachises and petioles, allowing the pathogen to overwinter7,25,27,32. In spring, apothecia emerge on the previous years’ rachises, and ascospores are released once more32.

It is, however, remarkable that the anamorph produces prolific numbers of conidia both in axenic culture and on infected rachises. The conidia are thought to be transported in water between different strains infecting the same rachis, and between different rachises on the forest floor13,33. The purpose of this energetically-demanding profusion of conidia remains unclear, considering that they travel only short distances and are produced among abundant mating partners. Recently, microconidia of the ascomycete rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae, similarly believed to function exclusively as spermatia, were found to germinate on both artificial and leaf surfaces, and to cause disease in rice and barley34. The germination rate was low, at 5–10%, of which germlings only 17% were viable34. Given this overall viability of only 0.85–1.7% for microconidia, it is unsurprising that their function in disease had been overlooked.

Here, we test the hypothesis that the H. fraxineus conidia germinate at low frequency and cause occasional infection, like the microconidia of M. oryzae. We therefore tested the ability of these asexual spores to: i. germinate in vitro and in planta; ii. infect young ash seedlings and iii. initiate saprophytic growth on ash debris (seed coats and fallen leaves) and in soil, with a view to eliminating or elucidating their potential roles in the disease biology of H. fraxineus.


Strains and culture conditions

H. fraxineus strain HP11 (kindly provided by Dr J Webber, Forest Research, UK) was cultured on Malt Extract or V8 Agar plates and incubated at 18 °C in natural lighting conditions. Strains were stored on agar slopes at 4 °C. Extensive, synchronous sporulation was induced by transferring four week old cultures to 4 °C and maintaining them in the dark for two weeks.

Ash seedling culture

Ash (Fraxinus exelsior) seeds were obtained from Forestart Ltd (Shrewsbury, UK). They were stored at 4 °C until use and germinated in John Innes No. 2 soil in a growth cabinet with 16 h day length and day/night temperatures of 18 °C/14 °C. When seedlings developed their first true leaves, they were transferred to individual 5 cm soil pots. For experiments involving inoculated soil, seeds were germinated on trays containing the treated soil and then thinned to 24 seedlings per tray at the cotyledon stage. Seeds which failed to germinate were not removed, but left on the soil surface.

Leaf and soil inoculations

Twelve week old seedlings were transferred to day/night temperatures of 16 °C/10 °C. For leaf inoculations, 5 ml of 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 (in sterile distilled water) was added to sporulating cultures of H. fraxineus and agitated gently to create a spore suspension. Spore suspensions were passed twice through double-layers of Miracloth to remove any fragments of mycelium and visual checks made with a dissecting microscope to confirm that only spores were present. Suspensions were centrifuged for 5 min at 5000 g and the spore pellet re-suspended in 0.1% Tween 20 to give a final concentration of 107 spores per millilitre. This was applied to both surfaces of all true leaves using a paintbrush. For soil inoculation, spore suspensions were obtained in the same way, but spore concentrations were not set by spore counts. Instead, the sporulating area of culture from which the spores were obtained was measured, using photography and simple image analysis in ImageJ35. ‘Low spore’ inoculum was harvested from one or the equivalent of one 10 cm2 petri dish. ‘High spore’ inoculum was derived from ten times that surface area. As positive controls, agar plates containing the same areas of culture were scraped to give a mixture of mycelium and spores. Inocula were mixed thoroughly with 500 g (dry weight) of John Innes No. 2 compost, on which ash seeds were subsequently germinated as described. For the soil growth experiments, mycelium was scraped from plates, weighed, and 1 g samples ground with 0.1 ml of sterile distilled water using an eppendorf pestle. Samples were diluted to 1 ml and added drop by drop to 25 g (dry weight) soil in a 10 cm2 petri dish. Inoculated soil was stirred thoroughly before and after addition of a further 10 ml water and incubation at room temperature.

DNA extraction, PCR detection and qPCR quantification of H. fraxineus

DNA extraction was carried out on leaf samples using a modified phenol-chloroform extraction protocol (e.g. ref. 36). Samples were flash frozen and ground in liquid nitrogen, and incubated for 30 min at RT in 1 ml modified Tris-EDTA DNA extraction buffer containing 6% (v/v) SDS plus 0.5 ml of 0.1 mm diameter glass beads per sample. Incubation was combined with vibrational mixing at 2000 rpm using a VibraxTM orbital shaker. Root and ash debris samples were treated in the same manner as leaves, after removing adhering soil by extensive rinsing in sterile distilled water. DNA was extracted from soil samples using the protocol described by Yeates et al.37, replacing the final phenol-chloroform extraction step with the protocol described above. PCR detection of H. fraxineus in extracted DNA was performed using DreamTaq Green PCR Master Mix and 30 cycles of 30 s, 95 °C melting, 30 s, 60 °C annealing and 1 min, 72 °C extension with specific primers (fwd: CTTGCGATCGTTGTGGTTGTGAG, rev: TCGACCAGTTGTGTAAACTCCAC), kindly provided by Dr S Kilaru (University of Exeter). For quantitative real-time PCR of soil DNA samples, Soil and control HP11 DNA samples were diluted to 100 ng/μl in milliQ water, using a nanodrop® spectrophotometer to measure DNA concentration. Control HP11 DNA was then serially diluted to give a ladder of H. fraxineus DNA concentrations (100, 50, 10, 5 and 1 ng/μl). Soil DNA samples were diluted to a final concentration of 50 ng/μl. qPCR was then carried out using SYBR green master mix (Thermo), 1 μl of template DNA and two primer sets, designed to the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gpd) (fwd: ATGGCTCCTACTAAGATTGGAATCA; rev: GCTCGATGAAGGGATCGTTGACA) and α-tubulin (fwd: ATGCGTGAAGTCATCAGCATCAAC; rev: TCTGTAGTCGTTGATGTATCTTACC) genes, using a Mx3005P qPCR System (Agilent) on the default SYBR green settings. Ladder samples and no-template controls were run twice, each time in quintuplicate and test samples once, in triplicate. Primer efficiencies were calculated from the slopes of the standard curves of Ct vs log10[DNA] (gpd–88.6%; α-tubulin–85.4) and the R2 values for the standard curves were 0.92 (gpd) and 0.90 (α-tubulin). Concentration of H. pseudoalbididus DNA in the total soil DNA samples was then calculated from the relevant standard curve.

Germination assays on artificial surfaces

Ash leaves were immersed in chloroform for five minutes and 500 μl of the resulting chloroform/leaf wax solution dripped onto hydrophobic glass cover slips. After evaporation of the chloroform, these cover slips were inoculated with 10 μl of a freshly prepared 107/ml spore suspension and incubated in a moist chamber at 18 °C for 24 h under natural lighting conditions.

Tissue staining and confocal microscopy

Leaf and root samples were immersed for one hour, in the dark, in a solution of 0.05% (w/v) propidium iodide (PI) and 0.05% (w/v) fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugated lectin (wheatgerm agglutinin, WGA), prior to confocal microscopy. For visualisation, samples were mounted in 0.1% (v/v) phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7). Spores and germlings on artificial surfaces were stained with 5 μl each of PI and FITC, at the same concentrations as above. Confocal microscopy was carried out using argon laser emission at 500 nm with detection in 600–630 nm (PI, red) and 510–530 nm (FITC, green), using a Leica SP8 confocal microscope.

Scanning Electron Microscopy of sporulating fungus

Sporulating fungus was visualised by SEM after 14 days incubation at 4 °C, and again after a further 14 days. A cryo-SEM procedure was used in which small samples of sporulating fungus were removed from the surface of agar plates and rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen slush. Samples were then etched and sputter-coated for visualisation. This procedure was carried out using a Jeol JSM-6390LV cryo-SEM rig with Gatan Cryo-transfer system.


Asexual spores of H. fraxineus germinate with low efficiency on artificial surfaces and on ash leaves

Asexual spores of H. fraxineus are produced readily and abundantly in vitro (Fig. 1A). Such axenic cultures produced both aerial spores (used throughout this work) and spores embedded into the agar itself. Visualisation of sporulating cultures two weeks after transfer to 4 °C (total age = 6 weeks) by SEM revealed droplets and chains of spores, as described previously12. Older cultures, visualised four weeks after transfer to 4 °C (total age = 8 weeks), appear as a ‘sea’ of spores in which these structures remain visible (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1

Asexual spores of H. fraxineus.

(A) H. fraxineus produces asexual spores readily when cultured on MEA or V8 for 28 days at 18 °C followed by 14 days at 4 °C (HP11). (B) Asexual spores are abundant, appearing as a ‘sea’ in this scanning electron micrograph of strain HP11 on an MEA plate. Globules of spores and spore chains (arrows) can also be seen. (C) Asexual spores germinate on a hydrophobic glass slide overlaid with ash leaf waxes. (D) Asexual spores germinate on the ash leaf surface.

If conidia of H. fraxineus function in dispersal of the pathogen and in infection of ash, as well as their putative function as spermatia, then they must be able to germinate. To test this, we harvested conidia and inoculated hydrophobic glass slides, coated with ash leaf waxes, and also leaves of ash seedlings. After 24 h incubation on these surfaces, conidia/germlings were stained with FITC-conjugated WGA and visualised by confocal microscopy. Germination could be seen from one, or occasionally both, ends of the conidium (Fig. 1C,D). Co-staining with propidium iodide revealed that most of the non-germinating spores were non-viable (Fig. 1C). Germination was scored on three independently prepared artificial surfaces, and the numbers of germinated vs. non-germinated spores recorded (total number of spores scored per surface: 100). Germination frequency was determined to be 6.3 ± 0.9%. On leaf surfaces, spore germination was also observed (Fig. 1D), but again, this was rare.

Ash seedlings inoculated with asexual spores of H. fraxineus show symptoms consistent with ash dieback disease

Following foliar inoculation with H. fraxineus ash seedlings remained symptomless for 7–10 days. After this period, small, necrotic lesions began to develop on the leaves, with browning of the leaf vasculature apparent and wilting of leaves and stems. After 14 days, some leaves became entirely necrotic. Necrotic leaves were subsequently abscised. Forty five percent of inoculated seedlings died within three weeks.

H. fraxineus hyphae ramify over the leaf surface, associating primarily with the vasculature, and form putative sporulating structures within the leaf epidermis

Leaves were sampled from infected, symptomatic seedlings at twelve days post inoculation and stained with PI and FITC-WGA. Confocal imaging of these samples revealed fungal hyphae growing over the leaf surface, associated particularly with the abaxial surfaces of the vascular tissues (Fig. 2A). Within the epidermal cells covering the vascular tissue, fungal inclusions can be seen. These are complex multi-cellular structures which appear to be surrounded by ectopic plant cell wall tissue (Fig. 2B). Similar structures can be seen emerging from, or attached to, the abaxial leaf surface away from the vascular tissue, with a ring of PI-stained tissue at the plant-fungus interface (Fig. 2C,D). These rings are not stained with FITC-WGA are thus likely to be of plant origin. The precise nature of the fungal structures remains elusive, but they are suggestive of in planta sporulation. Confirmation that the observed fungus is, indeed, H. fraxineus, was obtained by PCR amplification of fungal DNA with ash die-back specific primers yielding an amplicon of the expected size in all inoculated, but no control, tissues (Fig. 2E).

Figure 2

Ash leaves infected with asexual spores of H. fraxineus.

Confocal microscopy images showing H. fraxineus stained with FITC-WGA (green) on ash leaves stained with PI (red). (A) H. fraxineus grows over the leaf surface after germination of asexual spores applied as foliar inoculum, associating particularly with the vasculature. Putative fungal fruiting bodies can also be seen within some vascular epidermal cells (yellow arrowheads). (B) Enlarged view showing one of these structures in more detail. (C,D) (enlarged): Similar structures also appear attached to the rest of the leaf epidermis. (E) PCR detection of H. fraxineus in ash seedlings inoculated with asexual spores via leaves (+ve control, H. fraxineus DNA from axenic cultures).

H. fraxineus associates with ash seedling roots when germinated on infected soil and subsequently inside the leaves

To test the hypotheses that asexual spores of H. fraxineus germinate in soil and infect ash seedlings via the roots, or can colonise abscised leaves and seed coats (ash debris), we inoculated soil with H. fraxineus spore suspensions or with mycelium at two inoculum densities each. Ash seeds were sown in these soils, as well as in non-inoculated soil, and seedlings were harvested twelve weeks later. Leaves and roots of these ash seedlings were stained and visualised by confocal microscopy. This revealed the presence of hyphae among, and wrapped around, the root hair cells, but apparently not within the root (Fig. 3A). The leaves, however, showed bundles of, and individual, hyphae emerging mainly from the vasculature (Fig. 3B,C). The fungus thus appeared to have invaded the aerial tissues of the ash seedlings via the roots from soil inoculum. DNA was therefore extracted from three independent samples from each treatment, each consisting of the roots or leaves of five seedlings. DNA was also extracted from samples of ash debris taken from the surface of the soil of each treatment. H. fraxineus specific PCR revealed the presence of the fungus in spore-inoculated and mycelial-inoculated treatment in each sample type (Fig. 3D), indicating that the fungus had been able to associate with the ash and migrate up the plant regardless of the form of the initial inoculum.

Figure 3

Confocal microscopy images showing H. fraxineus on ash material grown on soil inoculated with asexual spores or mycelia; fungus stained with FITC-WGA (green) and ash tissue stained with PI (red).

(A) H. fraxineus hyphae among the root hairs of ash seedlings (enlarged view at right); (B) H. fraxineus emerging from the leaf vascular tissue and (C) emerging from leaf epidermis (blue arrowheads). (D) PCR detection of H. fraxineus in root, leaf and ash debris samples from inoculated soil (LS, low spores; HS, high spores; M, mycelium; −ve, uninfected; +ve, control H. fraxineus DNA from culture). Three independent replicates are shown.

H. fraxineus grows as a soil fungus in the absence of ash tissue

Finally, we investigated whether H. fraxineus survives and grows in the soil in the absence of ash. We inoculated three petri dishes of soil with H. fraxineus. Three samples were taken, each pooled from five random points in each dish on the day of inoculation. This was repeated after forty days maintenance of the dishes at high humidity, at 20 °C. H. fraxineus specific PCR primers did not detect fungus in the day 0 samples, but returned strong bands of the expected size after incubation for 40 days (Fig. 4a). To confirm this result, we carried out qPCR on the same DNA, using primers designed to amplify the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gpd) and α-tubulin genes of H. fraxineus (Fig. 4b). Both genes showed a significant increase in H. fraxineus DNA over the 40 day period (p = 0.015 (gpd) and 0.0004 (α-tubulin); t-tests with Bonferroni correction). The average fold-increase for gpd across the three samples was 6.81x, while for α-tubulin this was 14.96x; the two average fold-increases were not, however, significantly different (p = 0.11; t-test). This finding demonstrates fungal survival and an increase in fungal biomass in ash-free soil.

Figure 4

(a) PCR detection of H. fraxineus in samples of inoculated soil on Day 0 (left) and Day 40 (right). +ve, control H. fraxineus DNA from culture. Three independent soil replicates were used (labelled 1, 2 and 3, and two technical replicates of the PCR were performed for each); (b) qPCR of same soil DNA samples, showing estimated H. fraxineus DNA concentrations (in ng/50 ng total soil DNA) based on each of two genes. Both genes show a significant increase in the amount of H. fraxineus DNA over the 40 day period in all three samples, with no significant difference between the two genes.


In this work, we have demonstrated that the conidia of H. fraxineus are capable of germination, albeit at low frequency. This germination takes place on both hydrophobic glass slides overlaid with ash waxes, and ash leaves, where it can lead to infection. H. fraxineus can colonise soil and ash debris and is able to colonise ash seedlings via association with the root, followed by infection of the aerial tissue. This seedling infection appears to be systemic, based on PCR detection assays and microscopy, although the course of infection may vary in saplings and mature trees. Such soil-borne infection could be responsible for lesions seen at the root collar of saplings or mature trees. The low germination rate and viability of conidia and germlings is consistent with the behaviour of microconidia in M. oryzae34.

Based on these data, we have developed a model for the role of conidia in the lifecycle of the pathogen, a schematic of which is provided in Fig. 5. In this model, conidia germinate on leaves, causing necrosis, and infected leaves drop to the forest floor. If the structures seen within the leaves are, indeed, fruiting bodies, then amplification of the inoculum in the absence of a mating partner may occur. Even without new spores, existing mycelium proliferates in the soil, on fallen leaves and on seed coats, demonstrated here. Finally, this mycelium encounters ash roots, tracking along them to colonise and infect a new ash tree.

Figure 5

Model outlining the possible roles of asexual spores in ash infection by H. fraxineus.

1. Spores arrive in the environment of a susceptible ash tree (e.g. via wind). 2. Spores germinate on leaves and on ash seed cases. 3. Leaves become infected, with the fungus growing over the surface and forming internal structures, which may be fruiting bodies, amplifying the inoculum. 4. Infected leaves are abscised along with the ripe seeds; the fungus continues to propagate on leaf litter, seed cases and other debris, as well as in the soil itself (5). 6. From the soil, mycelium/germinated spores can invade the roots of mature trees and seedlings. 7. Sporulation, including sexual sporulation if strains of opposite mating types are present, may then occur in the leaf litter, releasing inoculum to re-infect the original host tree and others nearby (8).

This model has implications for the way in which we consider host infection and disease spread by H. fraxineus. Firstly, we have, until now, considered the potential for infection based on ascospore numbers alone, ignoring the role played by the asexual spores. Despite their low germination rates, conidia might contribute significantly to the rapid spread of infection. Aerial spread of H. fraxineus conidia has been proposed (Stenlid pers. com.), but not proven. The scanning electron micrograph images of sporulating plates of H. fraxineus show a contiguous ‘sea’ of spores, including globular and chain-like structures, which supports reports that conidia are sticky12. It would be interesting to determine whether extracellular mucilage is present, and if it is removed through rain-splash or dehydration, allowing conidia to separate and become airborne. Alternatively, sticky mucilage could assist conidial dispersal by insect vectors, which could explain the genetic differences between upland and lowland populations found by Kraj et al.22. Either of these scenarios would mean that conidia play a role in inter-population gene flow and pathogen range expansion.

Secondly, this model provides a route for systemic infection of ash in the absence of H. fraxineus strains of opposite mating types. This increases the risk of spreading ash dieback disease via transfer of small quantities of spores or mycelium.

However, given the high intra-population genetic diversity, the greatest significance of the findings reported here lies in the potential for asexual sporulation in leaves and elsewhere. Conidia produced on infected leaves may be spread throughout the canopy by rain-splash, as in other plant pathogenic fungi which exude spores in extracellular mucilage (e.g. Zymoseptoria, Fusarium). Thus, strains originating from ascospore infection may spread throughout a stand of ash trees, and, if multiple strains are present, they may each be dispersed throughout the stand. In the leaf litter, the fungus can also grow on ash debris and in soil. This could vastly increase the numbers of conidia available on the forest floor to act as spermatia. Thus, this process could increase the spread and availability of parent strains in a small area, and may underpin the usually high levels of outcrossing which characterise H. fraxineus14,19.

These high levels of outcrossing and inter-population gene flow in H. fraxineus are cause for concern when considering the risks to forest ecosystems and forestry, as they indicate that any beneficial genotype arising through mutation, introgression from related fungi or from horizontal gene transfer (HGT) may spread rapidly within and between populations. This gives H. fraxineus a high evolutionary potential, even in comparison with other emerging infectious fungal diseases. As a result, this pathogen is unlikely to be long confined geographically by sub-optimal temperatures or competitors, and its prospects of survival and spread in the face of climate change are very fair. High evolutionary potential also raises the spectre of increased risk of the successful transition of H. fraxineus onto new hosts. The acquisition of a virulence gene allowing the fungus to attack additional hosts would be followed by the rapid spread of this new pathogenicity throughout the fungus’ range.

Studies indicate that whilst H. fraxineus is unable to infect species of the Oleaceae outwith the genus Fraxinus38, it can grow on leaf-extract agar made from plants of various genera within this family, including the economically important Olea europaea39. H. fraxineus is already pathogenic towards a number of ash species in addition to its main host, F. excelsior2,4,26,40,41. Although H. fraxineus is not able to hybridise with H. albidus42, there are known to be sympatric species of Hymenoscyphus43,44,45 which may be potential hybridisation partners from which virulence and pathogenicity genes might be acquired; some of these strains also produce conidia. Worryingly, Japanese strains of H. fraxineus are more virulent on both F. excelsior and F. pennsylvanica than are European strains40, indicating that the global H. fraxineus population already contains additional virulence genes. In a world of globalised trade, travel and transport, it is only a matter of time until more virulent strains reach Europe. These risks mean that a full understanding of the breeding strategies of H. fraxineus and its close relatives is needed to protect ash in Europe.

In conclusion, the previously overlooked potential of H. fraxineus conidia to germinate and cause infection may underpin the success of the pathogen by facilitating sexual reproduction, increasing gene flow between sympatric strains. This may expediate the rapid evolution of H. fraxineus, allowing this pathogen to attack F. excelsior and other ash species, and increasing the risk of its jumping onto additional Fraxinus or Oleaceae species. This rapid evolution also allows H. fraxineus to colonise new areas and adapt to new climates.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Fones, H. N. et al. A role for the asexual spores in infection of Fraxinus excelsior by the ash-dieback fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus.Sci. Rep. 6, 34638; doi: 10.1038/srep34638 (2016).


  1. Baral, H. O., Queloz, V. K. & Hosoya, T. S. Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, the correct scientific name for the fungus causing ash dieback in Europe. I.M.A. Fungus 5, 79–80 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kräutler, K. & Kirisits, T. The ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus is associated with leaf symptoms on ash species (Fraxinus spp.). J. Agric. Ext. Rural Dev. 4, 261–265 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kowalski, T. & Holdenrieder, O. The teleomorph of Chalara fraxinea, the causal agent of ash dieback. Forrest Pathol. 39, 304–308 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kowalski, T., Bilański, P. & Holdenrieder, O. Virulence of Hymenoscyphus albidus and H. fraxineus on Fraxinus excelsior and F. pennsylvanica. PloS ONE 10, e0141592 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Dvorak, M., Rotkova, G. & Botella, L. Detection of Airborne Inoculum of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus and H. albidus during Seasonal Fluctuations Associated with Absence of Apothecia. Forests 7, 1 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Muñoz, F., Marçais, B., Dufour, J. & Dowkiw, A. Rising out of the ashes: additive genetic variation for susceptibility to Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in Fraxinus excelsior. bioRxiv 031393 (2015).

  7. Timmermann, V., Børja, I., Hietala, A. M., Kirisits, T. & Solheim, H. Ash dieback: pathogen spread and diurnal patterns of ascospore dispersal, with special emphasis on Norway*. E.P.P.O. Bull. 41, 14–20 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hietala, A. M., Timmermann, V., Børja, I. & Solheim, H. The invasive ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus exerts maximal infection pressure prior to the onset of host leaf senescence. Fungal Ecol. 6, 302–308 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pautasso, M., Aas, G., Queloz, V. & Holdenrieder, O. European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) dieback–A conservation biology challenge. Biol. Cons. 158, 37–49 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chavez, V. A., Parnell, S. & Bosch, F. V. D. Designing strategies for epidemic control in a tree nursery: the case of ash dieback in the UK. Forests 6, 4135–4145 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell, R. J., Pakeman, R. J., Broome, A., Beaton, J. K., Bellamy, P. E. et al. How to Replicate the Functions and Biodiversity of a Threatened Tree Species? The Case of Fraxinus excelsior in Britain. Ecosys. 19, 1–14 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kowalski, T. Chalara fraxinea sp. nov. associated with dieback of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in Poland. Forest Pathol. 36, 264–270 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gross, A., Zaffarano, P. L., Duo, A. & Grünig, C. R. Reproductive mode and life cycle of the ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus. Fungal Genet. Biol. 49, 977–986 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gross, A., Grünig, C. R., Queloz, V. & Holdenrieder, O. A molecular toolkit for population genetic investigations of the ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus. Forest Pathol. 42, 252–264 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chandelier, A., Helson, M., Dvorak, M. & Gischer, F. Detection and quantification of airborne inoculum of Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus using real‐time PCR assays. Plant Pathol. 63, 1296–1305 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kirisits, T., Matlakova, M., Mottinger-Kroupa, S., Cech, T. L. & Halmschlager, E. The current situation of ash dieback caused by Chalara fraxinea in Austria. In: Proceedings of the conference of IUFRO working party 7, 97–119 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gross, A., Holdenrieder, O., Pautasso, M., Queloz, V. & Sieber, T. N. Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus, the causal agent of European ash dieback. Molec. Plant Pathol. 15, 5–21 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kowalski, T. & Bartnik, C. Morphological variation in colonies of Chalara fraxinea isolated from ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) stems with symptoms of dieback and effects of temperature on colony growth and structure. Acta Agrobot. 63, 99–106 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gross, A., Hosoya, T. & Queloz, V. Population structure of the invasive forest pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus. Molec. Ecol. 23, 2943–2960 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen, D. T., Cleary, M. R., Enderle, R., Berlin, A. & Stenlid, J. Analyses of the ash dieback pathogen, Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, suggest role of tree species diversity on colonization and population structure differentiation. Forest Pathol. 46, 82–84 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Haňáčková, Z., Koukol, O., Havrdová, L. & Gross, A. Local population structure of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus surveyed by an enlarged set of microsatellite markers. Forest Pathol. 45, 400–407 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kraj, W., Zarek, M. & Kowalski, T. Genetic variability of Chalara fraxinea, dieback cause of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Mycol. Prog. 11, 37–45 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bengtsson, S. B., Vasaitis, R., Kirisits, T., Solheim, H. & Stenlid, J. Population structure of Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus and its genetic relationship to Hymenoscyphus albidus. Fungal Ecol. 5, 147–153 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Burokiene, D., Prospero, S., Jung, E., Marciulyniene, D., Moosbrugger, K. et al. Genetic population structure of the invasive ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in its expanding range. Biol. Invas. 17, 2743–2756 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Baral, H. O. & Bemmann, M. Hymenoscyphus fraxineus vs. Hymenoscyphus albidus–A comparative light microscopic study on the causal agent of European ash dieback and related folicolous, stroma-forming species. Mycol. 5, 228–290 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gross, A. & Holdenrieder, O. Pathogenicity of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus and Hymenoscyphus albidus towards Fraxinus mandshurica var. japonica. Forest Pathol. 45, 172–174 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Queloz, V., Grünig, C. R., Berndt, R., Kowalski, T., Sieber, T. N. & Holdenrieder, O. Cryptic speciation in Hymenoscyphus albidus. Forest Pathol. 41, 133–142 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  28. McKinney, L. V., Thomsen, I. M., Kjær, E. D., Bengtsson, S. B. K. & Nielsen, L. R. Rapid invasion by an aggressive pathogenic fungus (Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus) replaces a native decomposer (Hymenoscyphus albidus): a case of local cryptic extinction? Fungal Ecol. 5, 663–669 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kirisits, T., Dämpfle, L. & Kräutler, K. Hymenoscyphus albidus is not associated with an anamorphic stage and displays slower growth than Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus on agar media. Forest Pathol. 43, 386–389 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kräutler, K., Treitler, R. & Kirisits, T. Hymenoscyphus fraxineus can directly infect intact current‐year shoots of Fraxinus excelsior and artificially exposed leaf scars. Forest Pathol. 45, 274–280 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Matsiakh, I., Solheim, H., Nagy, N. E., Hietala, A. M. & Kramarets, V. Tissue‐specific DNA levels and hyphal growth patterns of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in stems of naturally infected Fraxinus excelsior saplings. Forest Pathol. doi: 10.1111/efp.12245 (2015).

  32. Kirisits, T. Ascocarp formation of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus on several‐year‐old pseudosclerotial leaf rachises of Fraxinus excelsior. Forest Pathol. 45, 254–257 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Maso, E. & Montecchio, L. Risk of Natural Spread of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus with Environmental Niche Modelling and Ensemble Forecasting Technique. Forest Res. 3, 4 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang, H., Wu, Z., Wang, C., Li, Y. & Xu, J. R. Germination and infectivity of microconidia in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Nat. Comm. 5, 4518 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sambrook, J. & Russell, D. W. Purification of nucleic acids by extraction with phenol: chloroform. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 2006(1), pdb-prot4455 (2006).

  37. Yeates, C., Gillings, M., Davison, A., Altavilla, N. & Veal, D. Methods for microbial DNA extraction from soil for PCR amplification. Biol. Proceed. Online 1, 40–47 (1998).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Madigan, A., Bełka, M., Taylor, A. F. S., Kirisits, T., Cleary, M. et al. Can Hymenoscyphus fraxineus infect hardy members of the Oleaceae other than ash species? Forest Pathol. 45, 426–429 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Carrari, E., Capretti, P., Santini, A. & Luchi, N. Hymenoscyphus fraxineus mycelial growth on media containing leaf extracts of different Oleaceae. Forest Pathol. 45, 540–543 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gross, A. & Sieber, T. N. Virulence of Hymenoscyphus albidus and native and introduced Hymenoscyphus fraxineus on Fraxinus excelsior and Fraxinus pennsylvanica. Plant Pathol. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12450 (2015).

  41. Kirisits, T. & Schwanda, K. First definite report of natural infection of Fraxinus ornus by Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. Forest Pathol. 45, 430–432 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wey, T., Schlegel, M., Stroheker, S. & Gross, A. MAT–gene structure and mating behavior of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus and Hymenoscyphus albidus. Fungal Genet. Biol. 87, 54–63 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zheng, H. & Zhuang, W. Four new species of the genus Hymenoscyphus (fungi) based on morphology and molecular data. Sci. China Life Sci. 56, 90–100 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gross, A. & Han, J. G. Hymenoscyphus fraxineus and two new Hymenoscyphus species identified in Korea. Mycol. Prog. 14, 1–13 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gross, A., Hosoya, T., Zhao, Y. J. & Baral, H. O. Hymenoscyphus linearis sp. nov: another close relative of the ash dieback pathogen H. fraxineus. Mycol. Prog. 14, 1–15 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was fund by a grant from the BBSRC to the Nornex Consortium, BBS/E/J/000CA523, in association with DEFRA. We thank Dr Chris Thornton for useful discussions concerning fungal pathogens of soil and Dr Sreedhar Kilaru for kindly providing primers.

Author information




H.N.F. conceived, designed, and carried out the experiments, analysed data, produced figures and wrote the manuscript. C.M. carried out experiments. S.J.G. conceived experiments, reviewed the manuscript and oversaw the project.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fones, H., Mardon, C. & Gurr, S. A role for the asexual spores in infection of Fraxinus excelsior by the ash-dieback fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. Sci Rep 6, 34638 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing