Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Nano-inspired fluidic interactivity for boiling heat transfer: impact and criteria

Abstract

The enhancement of boiling heat transfer, the most powerful energy-transferring technology, will lead to milestones in the development of high-efficiency, next-generation energy systems. Perceiving nano-inspired interface functionalities from their rough morphologies, we demonstrate interface-induced liquid refreshing is essential to improve heat transfer by intrinsically avoiding Leidenfrost phenomenon. High liquid accessibility of hemi-wicking and catalytic nucleation, triggered by the morphological and hydrodynamic peculiarities of nano-inspired interfaces, contribute to the critical heat flux (CHF) and the heat transfer coefficient (HTC). Our experiments show CHF is a function of universal hydrodynamic characteristics involving interfacial liquid accessibility and HTC is improved with a higher probability of smaller nuclei with less superheat. Considering the interface-induced and bulk liquid accessibility at boiling, we discuss functionalizing the interactivity between an interface and a counteracting fluid seeking to create a novel interface, a so-called smart interface, for a breakthrough in boiling and its pragmatic application in energy systems.

Introduction

Economic growth and technological advancement have relied on the availability of efficient, cost-effective, sustainable energy; indeed, the development of sustainable energy sources continues to be pressing issue for humankind1. Various engineering approaches have attempted to enhance the efficiency of existing power generation systems based on fossil fuel and nuclear fission plant; the issue has also triggered research into a challenging nuclear fusion plant as an alternative and ultimate energy source. Taking into account principal rules in thermodynamics, however, higher operating temperature conditions are essential for achieving higher efficiency in the thermodynamic cycle of most gas-turbine systems. Moreover, nuclear fusion requires high-temperature plasmas, resulting in significant thermal loads of over a few megawatts per square meter in a tokamak system. Thus, there is a need for technology breakthroughs for highly efficient thermal energy transfer schemes and subsequent high technology for cooling.

Convection in heat and mass transfer, defined in terms of the energy transfer via the movement of groups or aggregates of molecules within a fluid, is widely used to describe various cooling and thermal energy transfer processes due to its efficiency and applicability. As a pragmatic convection scheme, boiling heat transfer may be a promising solution to technical demands due to its outstanding heat/energy transfer ability2. A goal in boiling research is to maximize this ability, which can be specifically indicated by the allowable heat dissipation capacity (i.e., the critical heat flux, CHF) and the heat dissipation efficiency (i.e., the heat transfer coefficient, HTC). Boiling is a thermo-fluidic phenomenon accompanying the heterogeneous phase change of a working fluid on a surface and multiphase flow, involving cascading ebullition and, subsequently, intricate convective behavior3,4. On these phenomenological grounds, which reach back to the historic discovery of Leidenfrost in 17565, boiling performance is governed primarily by the hydrodynamic balance between vaporization and the counteracting liquid accessibility at a heat-dissipating hot surface. Thus, the major research streams for boiling enhancement have pursued how to manipulate the hydrodynamic characteristics of a working fluid and to functionalize interface-inspired characteristics with respect to interfacial hydrodynamic interactivity6,7. Figure 1 shows schematically the principal factors in the bulk and interface-inspired hydrodynamic aspects and subsequent boiling characteristic curves. The bulk fluidic accessibility is related to the hydrodynamic balance between vapor and counteracting liquid, and the interface-inspired accessibility is explained with morphology-induced interfacial effects involving static and dynamic wetting8.

Figure 1: Descriptions of bulk and interface-inspired hydrodynamic behaviors in boiling heat transfer and associated boiling performance.
figure1

The bulk hydrodynamic aspect is determined by liquid surface tension, σ, and the Rayleigh–Taylor wavelength, λRT, confining the characteristic distance between upward vapor columns and counteracting downward liquids, which is related to the bulk hydrodynamic balance. Otherwise, interface-induced near-field hydrodynamics can be explained with an intuitive roughness effect and its subsequent static and dynamic wetting characteristics on an interface. Here, static and dynamic wetting can be indicated by the apparent static contact angle (CA) and morphologically induced hemi-wicking, respectively, which affect effective nucleation sizes (r). Boiling curves represent performance factors, including the critical heat flux (CHF), the heat transfer coefficient (HTC) and the onset of nucleate boiling11.

Novel nano/material technologies for nano-inspired functional interfaces have triggered a possible leap in boiling research, due to their unique characteristics9,10; these features originate from the intrinsic functionality of extremely rough morphologies and associated fluidic interactivity11,12,13,14. Extremely high surface roughness, via nanoscale structures, such as vertically aligned nanowires10,14,15,16 and micro/nano-hierarchical structures13,17, greatly expand the interfacial contact area, allowing greater heat dissipation than macroscale structures do. Additionally, surface roughness accompanies the intensification of hydrophilicity, towards a superhydrophilic regime, which is clearly favorable to wetting or refreshing of the interface by a liquid-phase working fluid.

Although boiling performance has been improved markedly by the use of novel nanomaterial technologies, there are unresolved issues regarding CHF2,12. What are the direct grounds for the recent breakthroughs in enhancing CHF using nano-inspired surfaces? Can we suggest a plausible and universal CHF model predicting the CHF as a physical function of the design variables of the interfacial surfaces? In particular, previous approaches primarily considered the two factors of surface roughness and static wetting characteristics, which are not independent factors but tied up each other. The factors were unable to provide a plausible physical demonstration revealing peculiar contributions of nanoscale structures to boiling enhancement10,12,18. This raises questions as to whether the principal factors considered so far are indeed independent and whether other as-yet undiscovered factors may explain the phenomenon. In considering this, we bring up an additional peculiarity from nano-inspired functionality: that is, the interfacial hydrodynamics regarding dynamic wetting by morphologically driven hemi-wicking2,15,19,20,21,22. Beyond intuitive concepts regarding surface roughness and static wettability, morphologically driven hemi-wicking, which can be an integrative index of the intuitive features, has proven to be a governing factor determining the interfacial hydrodynamic status15,19,20,21,22.

In this study, we provide a plausible answer to the question as to whether interfacial hemi-wicking is an appropriate factor describing the peculiar role of nano-inspired surfaces and suggest a prerequisite for a future boiling technique. We confirm that the initiation of hemi-wicking, which must be differentiated from unconditional surface roughening, contributes greatly to the enhancement of CHF by reinforcing interfacial re-wetting2,12,23. Moreover, the causative nano-inspired functionality, which especially accompanies apparent superhydrophilicity, leads to an increase in HTC by catalyzing heterogeneous nucleation, due to the higher probability of smaller nuclei with less wall superheat demanded. For the demonstration of separate role of intrinsic liquid accessibility and morphologically-driven accessibility, we use a surfactant in order to strengthen bulk spreading of fluid on nano-treated surfaces. We demonstrate the independent impacts of interface-induced and bulk liquid accessibilities on boiling and examine their superpositioning effects for heat dissipation performance and their limitations. Bulk fluidic accessibility is controlled by the surface tension σ of the working fluid (here, deionized (DI) water) without affecting other bulk properties using a surfactant additive (FS-3100, DuPont). Local heal transfer characteristics are evaluated by a sensor (Fig. 2(a,b)) devised with different type of in situ nanostructures of vertically aligned silicon nanowires (SiNWs, Fig. 2(c,d)) and silicon nanopillars (SiNPs, Fig. 2(e–h)). The local temperature measuring sensors are just below the heating area (1 × 0.5 cm2) and an indium tin oxide layer is for a thin film heater. Randomly dispersed SiNWs and regular SiNPs are confined by a universal factor of the solid fraction (φ) defining morphology, which remains dry when the structures contact a liquid droplet. (See Methods section and Supplementary Information for material preparations, experimental procedure and data reduction).

Figure 2: Local temperature-measuring sensor with in situ nanostructures.
figure2

(a) Schematic diagram of the sensor. (b) Photograph of the completed sensor. (c,d) Silicon nanowires (SiNWs) with solid fraction φ = 0.087: average diameter davg = 100 nm, average pitch pavg = 300 nm, and average height havg = 15 μm. (e,f) Silicon nanopillars (SiNPs) with φ = 0.32: davg = 360 nm, pavg = 610 nm, and havg = 2 μm. (g,h) SiNPs with φ = 0.61: davg = 500 nm, pavg = 610 nm, and havg = 2 μm12.

Results and Discussion

CHF

Convective boiling behavior is explained by a fluidic aspect characterizing the phase change of a fluid and sequential multiphase flow4,8. Figure 3(a) shows typical behavior in terms of the fluidic resistance and hydrodynamic stability between up-flowing vapor columns and counteracting down-flowing liquids towards the boiling surface6,7,24. When stability cannot be maintained, resulting in a lack of refreshing liquids, devastating performance degradation and critical surface burnout will eventually occur due to a vapor blanket on the surface. Here, the surface tension of a bulk fluid is an important parameter affecting liquid accessibility and subsequent convective fluidic behaviors25. Thus, it is desirable to establish a quantitative relationship between the depression in liquid surface tension and the increase in the rate of heat transfer in the nucleation boiling regime26,27. However, nano-inspired interfaces can trigger peculiar near-surface hydrodynamic behavior (i.e., hemi-wicking) inducing morphology-induced liquid refreshing against vaporization just above a solid–liquid interface, as described in Fig. 3(b). As it is already classified by previous study8, roughness and its impact on dynamic wetting of the hemi-wicking, which are not highlighted by bulk so-called far-field hydrodynamic mechanisms, can be covered by a near-surface mechanism3,12,13,18,28,29.

Figure 3: Schematic diagrams of bulk and interface-inspired hydrodynamics.
figure3

(a) Perspective and top view of the bulk hydrodynamics showing λRT-spaced array of locations of vapor rise and superpositioned liquid on an upward-facing horizontal surface24. This figure is redrawn with permission. Copyright 2001, Elsevier38. (b) Interface-inspired hemi-wicking and its effects on interfacial liquid refreshing towards the vaporizing region.

Figure 4 shows boiling curves that are dependent on the bulk and the interface-induced liquid accessibilities, according to the variation in surface tension of the working fluid and the application of interfacial hemi-wicking, respectively. CHF occurs when the liquid cannot be sufficiently refreshed to maintain a balance against vigorous vaporization at a boiling site. Thus, CHF can be characterized in terms of hydrodynamic performance. The liquid accessibility against vaporization of a working fluid can be intrinsically forced by lowering its surface tension to be favorable for convective boiling30,31,32. However, excessive depression of surface tension over a critical point of additive concentration (i.e., the critical micelle point) can cause convective boiling performance to deteriorate because a further increase in additive materials, lowering σ, causes an increase in viscosity, which paradoxically hinders liquid accessibility towards a boiling surface26,27,30,31,32,33. This indicates the presence of an optimal condition for the manipulation of the bulk accessibility, presented in Fig. 4 as parabolic asymptotic distributions of CHFs with variation of concentration on a plain surface. However, hemi-wicking, driven by morphology manipulation, can reinforce liquid refreshing of heterogeneous boiling interfaces; as a factor characterizing the near-field hydrodynamic status on solid–liquid interfaces, it directly contributes to the enhancement of CHF. Its impact can be seen in Fig. 4 as a CHF increase, by more than 100%, on a wicking-inducing surface versus non-wicking conditions on a plain surface12,34.

Figure 4: Boiling characteristics of wall superheat (∆Tw) and applied heat flux (q′′) depending on far-field (macroscale surface tension control) and near-field (interfacial hemi-wicking control) liquid accessibility.
figure4

For hemi-wicking conditions, vertically standing SiNWs (average diameter davg = 100 nm, pitch pavg = 300 nm, and height havg = 15 μm) were used on a boiling surface. The inset presents the variation of static CAs on each surface according to the surface tension (σ) of DI water, controlled by the concentration of surfactant additive (c).

Considering the two hydrodynamic aspects, we demonstrate a theoretical CHF model based on hydrodynamic instability between upward vapor columns and downward liquid flow (Fig. 3(a)) and interfacial liquid refreshing by hemi-wicking (Fig. 3(b))12. Especially for defining the interfacial liquid refreshing via an interface manipulation, we attempt to formulate a model with a universal variable of the solid fraction (φ). The stability from bulk hydrodynamics should be guaranteed by balancing the down-flowing liquid and up-flowing vapor columns. When the Helmholtz instability of vapor columns leaving the surface distorts and blocks liquid accessibility to a boiling surface, critical heat dissipation will be attained35,36. As vaporization continues, the surface becomes deprived of liquid refreshing and an insulating vapor layer impedes heat dissipation by covering the surface. Based on Helmholtz stability, the allowed maximum heat dissipation capacity within a stable regime can be defined as the CHF ()8,37, and it can be postulated by considering the available gravitational energy to drive liquid into the boiling surface, resulting from the body force and the static wetting characteristics of the surface29:

where l, ρ, θ, and g are the latent heat of vaporization, density, CA on a boiling surface, and gravitational acceleration, respectively. The subscripts v and l indicate the vapor and liquid phases, respectively. The upward bubble column should be regarded with Helmholtz stability against downward liquid accessibility, and the characteristic length of the bubble column can be substituted by the Rayleigh–Taylor wavelength, λRT, which defines the critical distance of a stable interface between two fluids of different densities (here, up-flowing vapor and down-flowing liquid, Fig. 3(a))24,38,39. The Rayleigh–Taylor wavelength is given as 2π(σ/(g(ρl − ρv)))1/2 for the most critical cases in boiling analysis24,29,40.

Taking into account interface-induced hydrodynamics, we can build a supplementary model, which reflects the interfacial dynamic re-wetting and consequent heterogeneous phase change. The driving force of interfacial liquid refreshing is morphologically induced hemi-wicking; thus, we can deduce the refreshing rate of a liquid, i.e., its wickability, W41,42. (See Supplementary Information for characterization of the wickability.) Here, the volumetric refreshing rate of a porous interface filled by hemi-wicking is expressed as h·(1 − φ)W2 with the geometrical variables of the height of the employed interfacial structures (h) and the solid fraction (φ) of the wicking-inducing interface. The total amount of heat dissipation by interfacial re-wetting and the sequential phase-change () is then specified for the near-field. Then the critical amount of subsequent heat dissipation can be estimated by adopting the prerequisite stable boiling area with the critical characteristic length of λRT as follows12:

where the shape factor C1 is a correlating coefficient with regard to h, defined as the specific wicking space12. Herein, we assume that the hydrodynamic refreshment is uniform on a confined area (λRT2) preventing a local gradients that may occur due to the size effects43,44. This converging approach predicting CHF () on a blend of the bulk and the interface-induced hydrodynamics is consistent with experimental results12. If we can define surface status with a framed value of the solid fraction, as shown in Fig. 5, it can be a universal one which enables to cover various types of interfacial structures. From the demonstration, we find that morphological design variable φ and the sequential capillary momentum of wickability over a manipulated interface are the principal factors determining the CHF. This model shows that hemi-wicking may be an unrevealed clue2, providing a plausible physical demonstration of the peculiar contributions of nanoscale structures and a possibility to be a universal model covering the advantages obtainable from various types of nanostructures to boiling enhancement. Interfacial hemi-wicking is generated by the morphology-induced capillary pressure on the roughened surfaces and the consequential stronger interfacial refreshing leads to a greater liquid supply directly to the boiling surface. On this basis, it explains that the amount of critical heat dissipation can be increased by reinforcing capillary flow momentum through a structured forest, as well as by decreasing counteracting fluidic resistance with a lower φ12,22,41,42. Considering these aspects of boiling surface design, wickability (W), subordinate to a universal factor of the solid fraction (φ) defining interface characteristics15, can be decisive for the plausible extension of CHF according to the suggested model.

Figure 5: CHF estimations reflecting hydrodynamic criteria with regard to interfacial liquid refreshing based on both hydrodynamic liquid accessibilities.
figure5

A parametric presentation of the solid fraction (φ) is demonstrated from each surface with SiNWs (φ = 0.087 with davg = 100 nm, pavg = 300 nm, and havg = 15 μm) and SiNPs (φ = 0.32 with davg = 360 nm, pavg = 610 nm, and havg = 2 μm and φ = 0.61 with davg = 500 nm, pavg = 610 nm, and havg = 2 μm)12. Insets of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images show cross-sectional and top views of the fabricated nanostructures.

HTC

This peculiarity of nano-inspired functionality can also be highlighted in convective heat dissipation efficiency in boiling. As a heat/mass transfer mechanism, boiling heat dissipation is governed thoroughly by ebullition behavior: nucleation, growth, release, and mixing of the two phase fluids. Liquid accessibility is also a significant factor characterizing ebullition on a heterogeneous liquid–solid interface. Liquid accessibility can be manipulated passively by controlling surface tension, because lowering the surface tension of a bulk fluid leads to a weaker cohesive force between molecules and, consequently, favors accessibility to a boiling surface7. This tangible property of a liquid affects embryo evolution into bubble nucleation. For the range of active nucleation sites, vapor nuclei should form with an elevated pressure, higher than that of the surrounding liquid. The pressure difference between the nuclei and surrounding liquid is explained by the Young–Laplace equation (∆P = 2σ/rb, where rb is a bubble radius), and the pressure elevation can be obtained by superheat, which is a thermal energy source that results in a temperature gradient in a hypothetical thermal boundary layer on a boiling surface45,46. In the presence of superheat and the consequent temperature gradient across the layer, the range of active nucleation cavities rc can be given as a function of the wall superheat by45,46:

where δt, Tsat, and ∆Tw are the thermal boundary layer thickness, saturation temperature of the liquid, and wall superheat, respectively. The two terms D1 and D2 reflect the hydrostatic wetting characteristics of the surface. The effective cavity radius reff can be defined as the minimum wall superheat (∆Tw, min) condition that meets the criterion for nucleation initiation, which can be expressed as reff = rc(σ, θ, ∆Tw, min). The decrease in reff is attributable to the lowering of the liquid surface tension, as shown in Fig. 6, for both surfaces with and without hemi-wicking. On interfaces with and without hemi-wicking, reinforcing direct liquid accessibility by lowering σ attenuates the effective cavities. According to this approach, we can further demonstrate its impact on convective heat dissipation and heat transfer stability11,14. Small nuclei can be dispersed evenly on a roughened heating surface9,10, and a liquid with lower σ can readily access a boiling surface through the secured vacant space between restrained-nuclei; small nuclei can be released more readily and more rapidly, which will consequently lead to enhanced convective heat transfer. It has been demonstrated that convective heat dissipation is more stable and effective with small nuclei than with large bubble formation, because the latter retards the ebullition process from nucleation to release and causes straightforward aggregation into an insulating vapor-film layer11,26,27,32,33. As shown in the inset of Fig. 6, highly accessible liquids reinforced by passive σ lowering via higher surfactant concentration are thus effective in stabilizing temporal wall temperature fluctuations (i.e., Tstd, the standard deviation of transient wall temperature variations) during nucleation. In the nucleate boiling regime, we confirm that local surface temperature was more stable with attenuated temperature fluctuation by improving liquid accessibility through bulk hydrodynamic aspects even on the nano-treated surfaces.

Figure 6: Effects of fluid surface tension on the effective cavity size.
figure6

Variation of the effective cavity radius (reff) in nucleate boiling on a surface without (left y-axis) and with (right y-axis) a combinational interfacial hemi-wicking effect. The inset shows the local wall temperature fluctuation. Tstd is the standard deviation of transient wall temperature during 30 s for each steady heat flux condition.

From lowering the surface tension on an untreated surface without any effects of nano-inspired functionality, a dramatic superheat decrease was observed as a left-shifting of the boiling curves (Fig. 4). However, wall superheat variations were insensitive to nano-inspired surfaces. This different influence of passive liquid feeding from the lowered surface tension of a fluid is more evident if the experimental results are expressed as a plot of HTCs. From Fig. 7, the differential convective boiling characteristics can be found according to the superpositioning of the two strategies: passive (bulk) liquid feeding by lowering surface tension of a fluid and interfacial liquid refreshing by morphologically-induced hemi-wicking. Although the absolute HTCs are improved by lowering σ in every case without regard to the presence of hemi-wicking (inset of Fig. 7), the enhancement ratio of HTCi/HTCDI (subscripts i and DI indicate the σ-manipulated cases via a surfactant and DI water, respectively) weakens comparatively on a surface with hemi-wicking than without hemi-wicking by lowering the surface tension. This can be demonstrated based on the degree of reff variation (Fig. 6) according to lowering σ (from 59.0 to 16.0 mN/m): specifically, a decrease by 4.0 μm on a plain surface without hemi-wicking and by 0.41 μm with hemi-wicking, an order of magnitude difference. The near-field interfacial liquid accessibility by hemi-wicking is also feasible for making nucleation effective before bulk liquid feeding, by lowering σ47. Because the hemi-wicking surface initially confines reff to 0.88 μm due to subsequent superhydrophilic characteristics with a CA below 8.9°, it significantly cancels out the direct effects of lowered surface tension on reff attenuation.

Figure 7: Coupling of bulk liquid feeding and near-field interfacial refreshing and their impacts on convective heat transfer in a nucleate boiling regime.
figure7

(q′′ of 30, 50, and 80 W/cm2 on a surface without hemi-wicking, and 120, 140, and 170 W/cm2 on a surface with hemi-wicking). The inset shows overall HTCs with heat fluxes according to variation in surface tension.

The weakening of the enhancement ratio, when we directly reinforce bulk liquid accessibility, can also be demonstrated intuitively with the wall superheat characteristic and its impact on local Marangoni flow. Nucleated bubbles themselves act as a thermal insulating layer, with a lower thermal conductivity of 0.016 W/m·K, resulting in a considerable wall superheat increase during the nucleate boiling process. However as discussed previously, superhydrophilic characteristics accompanied by hemi-wicking generate predominantly small nuclei ebullition11, which constrains the effect of σ-dependent nuclei attenuation. Consequently, there is a diminished influence of σ on the reduction of wall superheat, which translates into a reduction in temperature deviation between the boiling surface and a saturated bulk fluid. This indicates that Marangoni flow induced by local temperature gradient around the nuclei should be attenuated, when we superpose the two strategies for liquid accessibility. In the case of upward surface and wall-heating conditions, upward liquid flows around the nucleated bubble generated by the thermal Marangoni force (Fig. 8), proportional to (∂σ/∂T)·∆Tw, which is caused by a surface tension differential along the bubble interface. This Marangoni flow originally prohibits the growth and detachment of nucleated bubbles, resulting in a flow opposite to the thermocapillary convection for an upward facing heater against buoyancy48,49,50. Regarding boiling performance, the Marangoni force is known to be an undervalued force, because there is a dominant buoyancy acting on nucleating bubbles in a gravitational environment48,49,50,51. However, small bubbles, of the order of a few tens of microns, can be dominated significantly by the Marangoni effect because the gravitational force is comparatively dominant for larger bubbles52. Thus, we speculate that the Marangoni effect can contribute to convective boiling with small nucleation sites resulting from σ lowering. The sequential dramatic wall superheat decrease can significantly attenuate the detrimental Marangoni force on a surface without dominant hemi-wicking effects. However, on a nano-inspired surface with hemi-wicking, the degree of Marangoni attenuation must be less dependent on σ lowering than on a non-wicking surface due to insensitivity to the shrinkage of nuclei (as discussed in Fig. 6) and subsequent lower variation in wall superheat, resulting in a temperature gradient along the nuclei. Thus, the improvement of HTCi/HTCDI can be weakened when we superpose the two strategies of enhancing bulk liquid accessibility and using near-field interfacial liquid refreshing by hemi-wicking.

Figure 8: Employment of nano-interface and associated nucleate boiling heat transfer.
figure8

Detrimental Marangoni flow around a nucleated bubble. Attenuation of surface tension-induced flows due to smaller nucleation and subsequently less wall superheat56. In schematics black and red lines indicate characteristics (flow and temperature distributions) for without and with hemi-wicking, respectively.

Conclusions

Enhancement of boiling, a powerful and feasible heat- and energy-transferring technology, is a challenging issue for the development of higher-efficiency and next-generation energy systems. Perceiving the peculiarities of nano-inspired interfaces and their functionalities, we demonstrated the independent and synergetic impact of interface-induced liquid accessibility via nanostructures on boiling enhancement and examined the combined effect with bulk liquid accessibility controlled by a surfactant. The role of interfacial hemi-wicking, a hydrodynamic functionality inspired by nanostructures, can be a plausible clue to answering remaining questions related to CHF improvement. The CHF on nano-inspired surfaces could be well predictable as a function of the characteristics of the intrinsic morphology and corresponding wickability.

Differing from unconditional surface roughening, morphologically driven hemi-wicking can lead to dramatic CHF enhancement even with passive liquid accessibility reinforcement by lowering the surface tension of a working fluid. Moreover, the strategies of surface roughening for interfacial hemi-wicking and surface tension control for passive liquid supply were separately and simultaneously beneficial for the decrease in wall superheat. In particular, there was a unique behavior whereby comparative HTC enhancement was attenuated when we superposed far-field liquid feeding with interfacial liquid refreshing with superhydrophilicity due to the difference in effective cavity size reduction and its consequent impact on wall superheat variation. Manipulations of the hydrodynamics as a strategy for possible further improvement of liquid accessibility can be a promising approach for enhancement. As such, novel nano- and material technologies can be adopted to provide the required interfacial functionality, a so-called smart interface, for breakthroughs in boiling performance and their application in various heat- and energy-transferring systems.

Methods

Local temperature sensor with in situ nanostructures

The devised local temperature sensor (Fig. 2(a,b)) consisted of five sets of four-wire resistance temperature detectors (RTDs), a thin film heater, and nanostructures synthesized in situ on the bare surface of the sensor11,12. The sensor was fabricated on a 500-μm-thick p-type silicon substrate (boron-doped, (100) orientation, 1–10 Ω·cm resistivity). The substrate was cleaned in piranha solution (3:1 mixture of H2SO4 and H2O2 by volume) for 40 min and was further sequentially cleaned with acetone and methanol for 5 min each using a sonicator. After cleaning, serpentine-shaped platinum (Pt) RTDs with a line width of 6 μm were formed by lift-off. An insulating oxide-nitride-oxide multilayer was deposited on the RTDs. After removal of the insulating layer from the RTD electrodes, an 800-nm-thick indium tin oxide (ITO) layer was deposited with sequential etching of the ITO for a 0.5 × 1.0 cm2 heater formation. Gold electrodes were formed on both tips of the ITO by Au lift-off. An ~1.5 Ω difference was observed for each RTD with a 1 °C change. In this study, the local wall temperature from a RTD in the center of the heating area was evaluated for boiling characterizations.

Synthesis of nanostructures

A silicon substrate was cleaned by sequential sonication in acetone and methanol solutions, and was further cleaned in piranha solution17,53,54. To synthesize SiNWs, the substrate was immersed in 5 mM AgNO3 and 4.8 M F solution for 1 min to form a Ag+ coating. After rinsing the substrate with DI water, the sensor was dipped into a solution of 4.8 M HF and 0.1 M H2O2. The Si coated by reduced Ag was oxidized to SiO2, and the HF solution selectively dissolved the SiO2. The Si substrate coated by Ag was then selectively etched, and the remaining portions formed vertically aligned SiNWs. The reduced Ag on the substrate was finally removed with nitric acid. For SiNP synthesis, we used the Langmuir–Blodgett method with 610-nm-diameter polystyrene (PS) nanospheres (Invitrogen, USA) and obtained a hexagonally close-packed monolayer of PS on the air–water interface12. The monolayer of PS nanospheres was transferred to the target Si substrate by scooping it up55. PS nanospheres on the substrate were converted into non-close-packed ones by shaving their external surfaces with an O2 plasma, and a gold layer was deposited by E-beam evaporation. The substrate underneath the gold layer was etched in a mixture of 5 M HF and 0.5 M H2O2. After etching, the gold layer and remaining PS were removed. The characteristic lengths of SiNPs were controlled by the initial diameter of PS for the pitch of SiNPs and the diameter of the remaining PS for that of SiNPs. The heights of these structures were controlled by etching time, and the SiNWs (Fig. 2(c,d)) and SiNPs (Fig. 2(e–h)) had heights of 15 μm and 2 μm, respectively, which met the corresponding hemi-wicking criteria (see Supplementary Information).

Morphology Characterization

Morphological characteristics of the nanostructures were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurement and image processing. The measurements and data reduction were conducted using field-emission SEM (FE-SEM, JSM-7001F, JEOL, Japan).

Evaluation of static contact angle and hemi-wicking

Static CAs were measured with a goniometer (KSV CAM-200, KSV Ins., Finland). Droplet images were collected with a high-speed camera using a frame interval of 2 ms and a resolution of 512 × 480 pixels, and static CAs were analyzed automatically with a calibrating program. Measurements were conducted using a 2.5-μL droplet of DI water, and were repeated at least seven times for averaging characteristics in each case. For the hemi-wicking evaluation, the substrate was located on a horizontal plate, and 5 μL of DI water was dropped on the substrate. The liquid propagation was recorded with a high-speed camera (M310, Dantec Dynamic, Denmark) at 100 fps. The displacement between the wicking-front line and droplet contact line was evaluated in a post-imaging process, and the consequent wicking coefficients, W, were evaluated by averaging eight wicking distances measured along octagonal radial lines12,15.

Pool boiling experiments

For boiling performance evaluation, we conducted pool boiling experiments using the devised sensor with in situ SiNWs or SiNPs. Deionized (DI) water was used as the working fluid, and all experiments were conducted at saturation conditions under ambient pressure (i.e., 100 °C of DI water at 1 atm). For manipulation of bulk liquid accessibility, the surface tension characteristics of the DI water were changed using a nonionic surfactant (FS-3100, DuPont, USA), which caused no significant change in physical properties except for surface tension. A detailed explanation on experimental setup and procedure is described in Supplementary Information.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Kim, B. S. et al. Nano-inspired fluidic interactivity for boiling heat transfer: impact and criteria. Sci. Rep. 6, 34348; doi: 10.1038/srep34348 (2016).

References

  1. 1

    Majumdar, A. A new industrial revolution for a sustainable energy future. MRS Bulletin 38, 947–954 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Dhillon, N. S., Buongiorno, J. & Varanasi, K. K. Critical heat flux maxima during boiling crisis on textured surfaces. Nat. Commun. 6, 8247 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Dhir, V. K. Boiling heat transfer. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 365–401 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Lloveras, P., Salvat-Pujol, F., Truskinovsky, L. & Vives, E. Boiling crisis as a critical phenomenon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 215701 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Leidenfrost, J. G. & Wares, C. S. E. A tract about some qualities of common water. Wares, C. S. E. (1964).

  6. 6

    Rahman, M. M., Pollack, J. & McCarthy, M. Increasing boiling heat transfer using low conductivity materials. Sci. Rep. 5, 13145 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Cho, H. J., Mizerak, J. P. & Wang, E. N. Turning bubbles on and off during boiling using charged surfactants. Nat. Commun. 6, 8599 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Lu, M. C., Chen, R. K., Srinivasan, V., Carey, V. & Majumdar, A. Critical heat flux of pool boiling on Si nanowire array-coated surfaces. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 54, 5359–5367 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Li, C. et al. Nanostructured copper interfaces for enhanced boiling. Small 4, 1084–1088 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Chen, R. et al. Nanowires for enhanced boiling heat transfer. Nano Lett. 9, 548–553 (2009).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Kim, B. S. et al. Stable and uniform heat dissipation by nucleate-catalytic nanowires for boiling heat transfer. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 70, 23–32 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Kim, B. S., Lee, H., Shin, S., Choi, G. & Cho, H. H. Interfacial wicking dynamics and its impact on critical heat flux of boiling heat transfer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 191601 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Chu, K., Joung, Y. S., Enright, R., Buie, C. R. & Wang, E. N. Hierarchically structured surfaces for boiling critical heat flux enhancement. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 151602 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Li, D. et al. Enhancing flow boiling heat transfer in microchannels for thermal management with monolithically-integrated silicon nanowires. Nano Lett. 12, 3385–3390 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Kim, B. S., Shin, S., Shin, S. J., Kim, K. M. & Cho, H. H. Control of superhydrophilicity/superhydrophobicity using silicon nanowires via electroless etching method and fluorine carbon coatings. Langmuir 27, 10148–10156 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Shin, S. et al. Tuning the morphology of copper nanowires by controlling the growth processes in electrodeposition. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 17967–17971 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Kim, B. S., Shin, S., Shin, S. J., Kim, K. M. & Cho, H. H. Micro-nano hybrid structures with manipulated wettability using a two-step silicon etching on a large area. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6, 333 (2011).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Hanley, H. et al. Separate effects of surface roughness, wettability, and porosity on the boiling critical heat flux. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 024102 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Bico, J., Thiele, U. & Quéré, D. Wetting of textured surfaces. Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 206, 41–46 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Cebeci, F. C., Wu, Z. Z., Zhai, L., Cohen, R. E. & Rubner, M. F. Nanoporosity-driven superhydrophilicity: A means to create multifunctional antifogging coatings. Langmuir 22, 2856–2862 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Extrand, C. W., Moon, S. I., Hall, P. & Schmidt, D. Superwetting of structured surfaces. Langmuir 23, 8882–8890 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Quéré, D. Wetting and roughness. Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 38, 71–99 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Kim, D. E., Park, S. C., Yu, D. I., Kim, M. H. & Ahn, H. S. Enhanced critical heat flux by capillary driven liquid flow on the well-designed surface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 023903 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Liter, S. Pool-boiling enhancement and liquid choking limits within and above a modulated porous-layer coating (PhD thesis, The University of Michigan, 2000).

  25. 25

    Kandlikar, S. G. & Alves, L. Effects of surface tension and binary diffusion on pool boiling of dilute solutions: An experimental assessment. J. Heat Transf. 121, 488–493 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Roll, J. B. & Myers, J. E. The effect of surface tension on factors in boiling heat transfer. AIChE J. 10, 530–534 (1964).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Hetsroni, G. et al. The effect of surfactants on bubble growth, wall thermal patterns and heat transfer in pool boiling. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 44, 485–497 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Wang, C. H. & Dhir, V. K. Effect of surface wettability on active nucleation site density during pool boiling of water on a vertical surface. J. Heat Transf. 115, 659–669 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Kandlikar, S. G. A theoretical model to predict pool boiling CHF incorporating effects of contact angle and orientation. J. Heat Transf. 123, 1071–1079 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Yang, Y. M. & Maa, J. R. Pool boiling of dilute surfactant solutions. J. Heat Transf. 105, 190–192 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Tzan, Y. L. & Yang, Y. M. Experimental study of surfactant effects on pool boiling heat transfer. J. Heat Transf. 112, 207–212 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Hetsroni, G., Mosyak, A., Pogrebnyak, E., Sher, I. & Segal, Z. Bubble growth in saturated pool boiling in water and surfactant solution. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 32, 159–182 (2006).

    CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Straub, J. The role of surface tension for two-phase heat and mass transfer in the absence of gravity. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 9, 253–273 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Kim, B. S., Choi, G., Shim, D. I., Kim, K. M. & Cho, H. H. Surface roughening for hemi-wicking and its impact on convective boiling heat transfer. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 102, 1100–1107 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Lienhard, J. H. & Dhir, V. K. Extended hydrodynamic theory of the peak and minimum pool boiling heat fluxes (NASA Report No. CR2270, 1973).

  36. 36

    Zuber, N. Y. Hydrodynamic aspects of boiling heat transfer (AEC Report AECU-4439 No. 0225960, 1959).

  37. 37

    McGillis, W. R. & Carey, V. P. On the role of marangoni effects on the critical heat flux for pool boiling of binary mixtures. J. Heat Transf. 118, 103–109 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Liter, S. G. & Kaviany, M. Pool-boiling CHF enhancement by modulated porous-layer coating: Theory and experiment. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 44, 4287–4311 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Nikolayev, V. S., Chatain, D., Garrabos, Y. & Beysens, D. Experimental evidence of the vapor recoil mechanism in the boiling crisis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 184503 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Lamb, H. Hydrodynamics, 6th edition (Cambridge University Press, 1959).

  41. 41

    Washburn, E. W. The dynamics of capillary flow. Phys. Rev. 17, 273–283 (1921).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Tas, N. R., Haneveld, J., Jansen, H. V., Elwenspoek, M. & van den Berg, A. Capillary filling speed of water in nanochannels. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 3274–3276 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Rainey, K. N. & You, S. M. Effects of heater size and orientation on pool boiling heat transfer from microporous coated surfaces. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf 44, 2589–2599 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Lu, M. C., Huang, C. H., Huang, C. T. & Chen, Y. C. A modified hydrodynamic model for pool boiling CHF considering the effects of heater size and nucleation site density. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 91, 133–141 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Hsu, Y. Y. On the size range of active nucleation cavities on a heating surface. J. Heat Transf. 84, 207–213 (1962).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Basu, N. Warrier, G. R. & Dhir, V. K. Onset of nucleate boiling and active nucleation site density during subcooled flow boiling. J. Heat Transf. 124, 717–728 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Cavicchi, R. E. & Avedisian, C. T. Bubble nucleation and growth anomaly for a hydrophilic microheater attributed to metastable nanobubbles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 124501 (2007).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Ahmed, S. & Carey, V. P. Effects of gravity on the boiling of binary fluid mixtures. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 41, 2469–2483 (1998).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Zhang, N. & Chao, D. F. Models for enhanced boiling heat transfer by unusual Marangoni effects under microgravity conditions. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 26, 1081–1090 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Sun, C. & Carey, V. P. Marangoni effects on the boiling of 2-propanol/water mixtures in a confined space. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 47, 5417–5426 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Abe, Y., Oka, T., Mori, Y. H. & Nagashima, A. Pool boiling of a non-azeotropic binary mixture under microgravity. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 37, 2405–2413 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Takahashi, K. Weng, J. & Tien, C. Marangoni effect in microbubble systems. Microscale Thermophys. Eng. 3, 169–182 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Kim, S. & Khang, D. Bulk micromachining of Si by metal-assisted chemical etching. Small 10, 3761–3766 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Huang, Z., Geyer, N., Werner, P., de Boor, J. & Gösele, U. Metal-assisted chemical etching of silicon: A review. Adv. Mater. 23, 285–308 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Oh, J. R., Moon, J. H., Yoon, S., Park, C. R. & Do, Y. R. Fabrication of wafer-scale polystyrene photonic crystal multilayers via the layer-by-layer scooping transfer technique. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 14167–14172 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Petrovic, S., Robinson, T. & Judd, R. L. Marangoni heat transfer in subcooled nucleate pool boiling. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 47, 5115–5128 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Human Resources Development Program (No. 20144030200560) of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), funded by the Korean Government’s Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy. B.S. Kim acknowledges the NRF Korea for support through the Basic Science Research Program (No. 2014R1A6A3A03058052) and the Alexander von Humboldt foundation for support through a Humboldt Research Fellowship (3.5-KOR/1159778 STP).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The conceptual idea and experimental design were envisioned by B.S.K. and H.H.C. B.S.K. and G.C. performed the material preparations and experiments. B.S.K., S.S., T.G. and H.H.C. analyzed results, and B.S.K. and T.G. revised the demonstration and presentation. All authors wrote the paper. T.G. and H.H.C. supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyung Hee Cho.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, B., Choi, G., Shin, S. et al. Nano-inspired fluidic interactivity for boiling heat transfer: impact and criteria. Sci Rep 6, 34348 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34348

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing