Abstract
Functionalized carbon nano-onions (f-CNOs) are of great interest as platforms for imaging, diagnostic and therapeutic applications due to their high cellular uptake and low cytotoxicity. To date, the toxicological effects of f-CNOs on vertebrates have not been reported. In this study, the possible biological impact of f-CNOs on zebrafish during development is investigated, evaluating different toxicity end-points such as the survival rate, hatching rate, and heart beat rate. Furthermore, a bio-distribution study of boron dipyrromethene (BODIPY) functionalized CNOs in zebrafish larvae is performed by utilizing inverted selective plane illumination microscopy (iSPIM), due to its intrinsic capability of allowing for fast 3D imaging. Our in vivo findings indicate that f-CNOs exhibit no toxicity, good biocompatibility (in the concentration range of 5–100 μg mL−1) and a homogenous biodistribution in zebrafish larvae.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Various carbon based nanomaterials are widely studied as promising imaging probes1,2,3, delivery vectors for drugs4,5,6 and as versatile theranostic nanomaterials3,7,8. Multi-shell fullerenes, known as carbon nano-onions (CNOs)9,10,11 are particularly attractive. They are sufficiently small (average diameters of 5 nm) to be carried in the circulatory system, have high cellular uptake, high biocompatibility and minimal systemic toxicity12. We have recently shown that CNOs decorated with water-soluble moieties (i) produce low inflammation in vitro, with significant reduction in the secretion of cytokines IL-1ß and (ii) decrease the recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes after injection in mice12. These important findings have made it possible to investigate fluorescent labelled CNOs as probes for high resolution imaging of intracellular trafficking and studies of biodistribution in different cell lines, including HeLa Kyoto cells13, MCF-7 human breast cancer cells14, HeLa cells15,16,17, and KB cells17. CNOs have been successfully applied in a variety of different fields including tribology18,19, catalysis20,21, sensing22, electronic applications23,24,25 and as molecular shuttles for fluorophores13,14,15,16,26.
For any nanomaterial utilized in an application that might lead to a release to the environment or to the exposure of living beings, in particular humans, an accurate risk assessment as well as a toxicological screening is highly needed27,28. The aquatic environment is of high importance since any contamination of water might lead to a wide distribution of the contaminant and thus to major pollution. All the biological in vitro studies investigating the effects of small CNOs (diameter of approx. 5 nm) with different surface functionalization on a variety of different cell cultures describe CNOs as a highly biocompatible nanomaterial. The effect of large CNOs (diameter of approx. 30 nm) on the immune system indicates that the cell response is highly dependent on the structure29. The inflammatory potential of small f-CNOs on immortalized bone-marrow-derived mouse macrophages and mouse bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells is found to be negligible and significantly lower than the effects of similarly functionalized single wall carbon nanotubes12. A recent report comparing large CNOs (diameter of 50–100 nm) with multiwall carbon nanotubes corroborates these findings30. We recently showed that small functionalized CNOs have no significant adverse effects on three weeks old freshwater polyp Hydra vulgaris31. The results reported on this very simple and basal animal, in addition to in vitro studies, suggest that CNO is a biocompatible and safe nanomaterial, but are not sufficient to rule out possible risks of CNOs exposure and release. Additional long-term toxicity studies of CNOs on complex organisms, as well as the fate of CNOs in biological systems, are strongly needed. Zebrafish represents an emerging and excellent model organism, mainly due to the fact that it has a remarkable similarity in the molecular signalling processes, cellular structure, anatomy and physiology to other higher order vertebrates32,33,34,35,36,37. Moreover, zebrafish embryos are ideal for high-throughput screening due to their external development, optical transparency, and short breeding cycle38,39. Zebrafish development represents a valuable tool to assess the in vivo toxicity and biocompatibility of drugs, chemicals and nanomaterials, with a focus on the developmental effects, and to obtain toxicity information at the whole animal level40,41,42,43,44,45. Several approaches using zebrafish embryos or larvae as an animal model have been developed in recent years to assess embryonic effects of chemicals, drugs and nanomaterials46,47,48, in order to predict the potential risk induced by the nanomaterial’s exposure on human health. We therefore decided to employ zebrafish as a vertebrate model to investigate the possible effects induced by benzoic acid functionalized CNOs (benz-CNOs, Fig. 1a left) and fluorescent boron dipyrromethene tagged CNOs (BODIPY-CNOs, Fig. 1a right). Different toxicological end-points such as the incidence of malformations, spontaneous movements and hatching rate/time disturbance are assessed during the zebrafish’s development. Moreover, the fluorescent BODIPY-CNOs biodistribution in zebrafish at completed organogenesis is studied using inverted selective plane illumination microscopy in order to probe their in vivo internalization inside the zebrafish larvae.
Results and Discussion
Preparation of CNOs
The preparation of benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs follows a protocol reported by our group14. Briefly, the pristine CNOs are functionalized with benzoic acid moieties by reacting them in a dimethylformamide/water mixture with in situ generated diazonium salts. Subsequently, the benzoic acid groups are functionalized with a meso-phenol substituted BODIPY fluorophore in an esterification reaction. An average of 37 BODIPY molecules per CNO are attached following this synthetic procedure. The number of BODIPY molecules per CNO (made of 9 shells of graphitic carbon) is calculated based on TGA data as published earlier14, following the protocol of Prato et al.49.
The fluorescently tagged CNOs show an intense green fluorescence with an emission maximum at about 512 nm. The fluorescence quantum yield in DMSO is estimated to be about 0.1714.
Bright Field Transmission Electron Microscopy (BF-TEM) and High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HR-TEM) are used to characterize the benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs. The presence of small agglomerates with a size lower than 100 nm is shown in both samples (Supplementary Information, Figure S1a and Figure S2a respectively).
HR-TEM is used to highlight the CNO internal structure. A representative HR-TEM image of BODIPY-CNOs is illustrated in Fig. 1b, which clearly shows individual CNOs with a diameters of 7 nm, with 9 concentric graphitic shells (with measured intershell spacing of 3.4 Å). HRTEM images of individual benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs are shown in Supplementary Information, Figure S1b and Figure S2b respectively. The height distributions analyses based on HRTEM images reveal a mean diameter of 6.8 and 7.1 for benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs respectively (see Supplementary Information Figure S5).
Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and Z-potential measurements are performed in order to characterize the nanoparticles’ physicochemical properties, including size and surface electrostatic charge. DLS measurements are performed in embryo medium to mimic the conditions used in biological experiments. DLS measurements in deionized water are also performed as reference. Initially, benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs are dissolved in deionized water at a mass concentration of 1.0 mL−1 and then diluted with embryo medium to a final mass concentration of 5, 10, 50 and 100 μg mL−1. Z-potential measurements are conducted on the same samples. Benz-CNOs have an hydrodynamic diameter located at around 190 nm in aqueous medium and between 210 and 350 nm in embryo medium (see Supplementary Information, Figure S3 and Table S1). Zeta potential values of −42 mV and −30 mV is obtained for benz-CNOs in water and embryo medium respectively (see Supplementary Information, Table S3). BODIPY-CNOs have hydrodynamic diameter between 100 and 170 nm in an aqueous medium and at around 210 in embryo medium (see Supplementary Information, Figure S4 and Table S2). Zeta potential values ranging from −23 mV to −36 mV and at around −30 mV is obtained for BODIPY-CNOs in water and embryo medium respectively (see Supplementary Information, Table S4). As previously reported by our group14, the values obtained for BODIPY-CNOs are less negative than the one found for benz-CNOs.
Toxicity evaluation of benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs
To elucidate the effects induced by benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs on the development of zebrafish, CNO dispersions of different CNO mass concentrations (100, 50, 10, 5 μg mL−1) in the embryo growth medium are prepared by ultrasonic treatment for 30 min at 37 kHz. The embryos are exposed to the different concentrations of benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs and the effects are investigated at different stages of development.
First, the survival and hatching rates of treated zebrafish embryo/larvae are measured at specified time points. As shown in Fig. 2a,b, up to 10 μg mL−1 of benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs no considerable changes in the survival rate of exposed embryos/larvae are observed in comparison with that of the control groups, whereas a significant difference (p ≤ 0.01) is present at higher concentration of CNOs (50 and 100 μg mL−1) between the 72 and 120 hours post fertilization (hpf). Nevertheless, in the first 24 hpf no dead embryos are observed and at 72 hpf the survival rate is higher than 95% for both types of CNOs.
Moreover, as depicted in Fig. 2c,d, embryos of the treated group start to hatch between 48 and 72 hpf, that is the normal temporal window for the hatching50. Compared to the untreated control, both types of CNOs do not induce any embryonic developmental delay. Figure 2c,d show that at the highest CNO mass concentration (100 μg mL−1), the hatching rates are 92.9% and 94.2% for larvae of 72 hpf treated with the benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs, respectively, even if with a significance difference compared with the negative control (p ≤ 0.01).
According to the OECD methodology51, to consider a nanomaterial as non-toxic, the survival and hatching rates of the embryos should be ≥ 90% and ≥80%, respectively. Consequently, our results reveal that benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs have a concentration dependent behaviour on the survival and hatching rates but exert no detectable toxicity in zebrafish during the development.
Furthermore, the heart beat rate and frequency of movements in zebrafish larvae at 72 hpf is monitored for abnormalities induced by the CNOs exposure. The number of heart beats for the larvae treated with benz-CNOs (144–149/min) and BODIPY-CNOs (146–150/min) is comparable to control group (150 beats/min) (Fig. 3a,b). The frequency of movements, as response to touching, is of 4–4.6 /min and of 4.3–4.6 /min for the ones treated with the benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs, respectively, without change compared to that of the control (4.6 /min) (Fig. 3c,d).The results obtained show no significant adverse effects of CNOs on both the parameters.
Finally, the effects of CNOs on the organogenesis of zebrafish are evaluated. The embryos exposed to different CNO mass concentrations grow normally into the larval stage without signs of possible toxicity. Figure 4 shows the biocompatibility of CNOs as observed by the morphological development. Embryos imaged at 12, 48 (see Supplementary Figure S6) and 96 (see Supplementary Figure S7) hpf, corresponding respectively to segmentation, hatching and larvae stages, show negligible malformation. The noted malformations are yolk sac edema (YSE), pericardial edema (PCE), fin fold abnormalities (FF) and tail flexure (TF). In the embryos/larvae exposed to 50 and 100 μg mL−1 of benz-CNOs, there is a significant difference (p ≥ 0.01), for the FF and TF respectively (as shown in Fig. 5). Considering the BODIPY-CNOs, we observe a significant difference at 10 (FF), 50 (FF and TF), and 100 μg mL−1 (TF, FF, YSE, PCE). Nevertheless, the total percentages of abnormalities, induced by CNOs, are less than 4% (representing a score of 1 on a published 4-point malformation scale38).
Our findings demonstrate the non-toxicity and good biocompatibility of CNOs on zebrafish during the development. These results are in good agreement with previous toxicological research performed in vitro on MCF-7 cells14 and in vivo on Hydra vulgaris31. In particular, in the freshwater polyp Hydra, it was demonstrated that shorter time (24 h) exposure of benz-CNOs on animal of three weeks old did not induce adverse effects in terms of change of morphology, behavior and reproductive capability31.
The results presented here are not in line with the current literature regarding other carbon nanomaterials probed on zebrafish. Recent studies reported that carbon nanomaterials induce dose and time-dependent toxicity in zebrafish during the development, with only one exception52. Exposure or injection of fullerene53,54, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs)55, graphene quantum dots56, and graphene oxide57,58 lead to a high mortality rate, delayed development and different distinct deformations of the embryos such as pericardial/yolk sac edema, tail flexure, and head defects. As the single exception, Kang et al.52 reported a high biocompatibility and very low biotoxicity of carbon quantum dots (C-QDs) in zebrafish. Embryos soaked with C-QDs grow normally, presenting only a small amount of abnormalities, comparable to that of the negative control.
Noteworthy, the toxic and adverse response of zebrafish embryos is strongly dependent on the hydrophobicity and solubility of the different carbon nanomaterials, which can be strongly affected by a different functionalization of the surface. The zebrafish until 72 hpf is surrounded by a chorion that protects the embryos59. The nanomaterials are able to pass the chorion through the pores (0.6–0.7 μm), but a low solubility can lead the nanomaterials to agglomerate, thus preventing uptake by the embryos and therefore affecting the reliability of the toxicity studies.
In this framework, different reports on these nanomaterials being either non-toxic59 or toxic55, depend on the degree of agglomeration. Our benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs do not seem to form big agglomerates, since we do not see any dark spots through the stereomicroscope on the chorion, and the surface is completely transparent (Fig. 4).
Here we report for the first time the in vivo non-toxicity and biosafety of benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs on zebrafish during the development by evaluating different toxicological endpoints. No adverse effects of CNOs are observed and noted for zebrafish embryo/larvae even at the higher mass concentration tested (100 μg mL−1). Results presented herein clearly demonstrate that CNOs have a good and high biocompatibility making them suitable for biomedical applications. The results obtained here by investigating the consequences of CNOs exposure on zebrafish, can be easily utilized to predict the effects of these nanomaterials on other vertebrates, since there is a high similarity between zebrafish and humans during development in terms of genetic, physiological and cellular processes.
Biodistribution of BODIPY-CNOs in zebrafish larvae
The biodistribution of BODIPY-CNOs is studied in a complete developed larvae (72 hpf). Previous works elucidating the biodistribution of different nanomaterials in cells and in different biological model systems, use a variety of imaging techniques such as Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and fluorescence microscopy60,61. Specifically, fluorescence microscopy is a noninvasive imaging technique and provides useful insights into the physiological structure and function of living organisms at cellular and subcellular resolution and allows for the direct visualization of the underlying functions of physiological processes in living cells or tissues.
Our previous study14 demonstrated the suitability of CNOs for high resolution imaging as shown by confocal images of live MCF-7 cells treated with the BODIPY-CNOs.
In this work, the in vivo imaging of BODIPY-CNOs (100 μg mL−1) in zebrafish larvae is performed using, as advanced microscopy technique, the iSPIM.The positive features provided by iSPIM are dual. First this system works under less photo-toxic conditions than the scanning based techniques such as confocal microscopy, thanks to the reduced photon density delivered on the sample. Second, iSPIM allows for fast 3D imaging making this technique a powerful tool to investigate the biodistribution of fluorescent nanomaterials in zebrafish embryos/larvae62.
Figure 6a,b illustrate the in vivo distribution of green fluorescent CNOs in the zebrafish developed at complete organogenesis and exposed to 100 μg mL−1 mass concentrations of the BODIPY-CNO nanomaterial (z-stack images of Fig. 6a,b are reported as Supplementary Figure S8 and Figure S9). CNOs enter the embryos via chorion pores until 48–72 hpf by simply soaking of the embryos in the solution. After the hatching, zebrafish larvae took the CNOs up through both swallowing and skin-absorption63. As shown in Supplementary Figure S7, BODIPY-CNOs are present in the blood vessels, indicating that they are able to enter in the circulatory system and accumulate in different areas of the whole zebrafish. The BODIPY-CNOs exhibit a homogeneous distribution. In particular, Fig. 6a represents the 3D maximum projection of the upper part of the larvae, where the BODIPY-CNOs accumulate selectively in the head with the highest brightness at the retina level. This suggests a high affinity of CNOs for this tissue. Figure 6b reveals the green signal of the CNO immobilized BODIPY fluorophore throughout the whole trunk of the larvae. Such results indicate a ubiquitous distribution of the CNOs in the larvae’s body at 72 hpf.
Methods
CNOs Synthesis
Pristine CNOs were prepared by the thermal annealing of nanodiamonds following a previously reported procedure64. The procedures for the chemical functionalization of the pristine CNOs, as well as the spectroscopic, microscopic and physicochemical characterization of the functionalized CNOs, were described elsewhere14. For the biological experiments, CNO dispersions were prepared in aliquots of zebrafish embryo medium (i.e. NaCl, KCl, CaCl2 · 2H2O and MgCl2 · 6H2O; pH 7.2), by ultrasonication in a bath sonicator at 37 kHz for 30 min. Initially a dispersion with a CNO mass concentration of 100 μg mL−1 was prepared, which is then diluted to the desired mass concentration.
Thermogravimetric analysis
TGA was conducted on a TA Q500 analyzer, using a Pt pan as sample holder. The measurement was performed in air using a heating rate of 10 °C/min. After equilibrating the sample at 30 °C for 5 min and then at 100 °C for additional 20 min, the sample weight was monitored until 900 °C had reached by the furnace.
Transmission electron microscopy
For BF-TEM and HR-TEM imaging, all the CNO samples were suspended in spectroscopic grade ethanol, mildly sonicated for 3 min and deposited onto holey carbon film-coated Cu grids. BF-TEM imaging were performed on a FEI Tecnai G2 F20 TWIN TMP instrument equipped with a Schottky source operated at 200 kV. In order to increase the contrast, a 7.5 mrad objective aperture was used. For HR-TEM imaging, all the CNO samples were suspended in spectroscopic grade ethanol, mildly sonicated for 3 min and deposited onto ultrathin carbon film/holey carbon film-coated Cu grids. Energy-filtered HR-TEM imaging was carried out on a Jeol JEM-2200FS instrument equipped with a Schottky source operated at 200 kV, a CEOS image aberration corrector and an in-column energy filter (Ω-type). All the reported HR-TEM images were acquired by using a 5 eV energy-selecting slit in order to select elastically scattered electrons.
DLS and Zeta-potential
DLS measurements were performed on the Malvern Nano-ZS instrument operating in backscattering (173°) mode and analyzed with the proprietary software Zetasizer, with automatic selection of the optimal detector position and number of independent measurements. Initially, benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs were dissolved in deionized water at a concentration of 1.0 mg mL−1 and then diluted with embryo medium to a final concentration of 5, 10, 50 and 100 μg mL−1. Each solution was sonicated for 30 min at 37 Hz. Z potential measurements were performed on the same solutions, by means of the same apparatus using the disposable proprietary Z-potential cuvettes.
Zebrafish husbandry
Wild-type (wt) adult zebrafish were purchased from a commercial source and were maintained in a circulating aquarium system on a 14 h light/10h dark cycle at 28 °C. The animals were fed three times daily with dry flake and were crossed as shown in the “Zebrafish Book”50.
Embryo toxicity study
Healthy zebrafish eggs were collected at 4 hpf, washed in embryo medium and placed into 24-well culture plates. Embryos were incubated with different concentrations of benz-CNOs and BODIPY-CNOs (100, 50, 10, 5 μg mL−1) and with embryo medium as negative control at 28 °C until 120 hpf. The survival rate, hatching rate, heart beat rate, frequency of movements and possible presence of malformations were evaluated directly using a stereomicroscope (Stereo Discovery.V8, Zeiss Microscopy) attached to a CCD camera at different time points (12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hpf). To maintain an accuracy statistics, all experiments were performed three times. All animal experiments were performed in full compliance with the revised directive 2010/63/EU.
Statistical Analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± S.D. and significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in combination with Holm-Sidak post hoc in order to compare each treatment group with the negative controls. A value of p ≤ 0.01 was considered statistically significant (marked by an asterisk in Figs 2, 3 and 5).
Biodistribution of CNOs in the larvae
The in vivo biodistribution of BODIPY-CNOs in zebrafish larvae was performed by iSPIM. Larvae of 72hpf were selected after the exposure to 100 μg mL−1 BODIPY CNOs and anesthetized with 0.016% (w/v) tricaine (ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate) (Sigma-Aldrich).
Inverted selective plane illumination microscopy (iSPIM)
Zebrafish imaging was carried out with a custom-built iSPIM microscope, mounted on a vertically oriented optical breadboard. The illumination unit was based on a conventional SPIM configuration in which a cylindrical lens (Thorlabs LJ1703RM, f = 75 mm) created the planar illumination focusing the light in the back focal plane of an objective lens (Nikon CFI Plan Fluor 10XW, 0.3 NA, 3.5 mm WD). A 488 nm laser beam (Obis Coherent) was used for the excitation. The signal detected from the detection objective (Nikon CFI Plan Fluor 10XW, 0.3 NA, 3.5 mm WD) was focused by a tube lens (Thorlabs AC254-200-A-ML) onto an sCMOS Camera (Hamamatsu Orca Flash 4.0) and filtered by a dichroic (Chroma 491 RDCXT) and emission filter (Semrock 525/50 nm). Zebrafish embryo was placed on a standard microscope petri dish (50 mm Sterilin Petri Dish, Thermo Scientific) filled with embryo medium and placed over a piezo-driven stage (Physik Instruments P-563.3CD) that allowed fine translation of the sample through the static light sheet to get sample 3D stack.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: d′Amora, M. et al. Biocompatibility and biodistribution of functionalized carbon nano-onions (f-CNOs) in a vertebrate model. Sci. Rep. 6, 33923; doi: 10.1038/srep33923 (2016).
References
Bartelmess, J., Quinn, S. J. & Giordani, S. Carbon nanomaterials: multi-functional agents for biomedical fluorescence and Raman imaging. Chemical Society Reviews 44, 4672–4698, 10.1039/C4CS00306C (2015).
Yoo, J. M., Kang, J. H. & Hong, B. H. Graphene-based nanomaterials for versatile imaging studies. Chemical Society Reviews 44, 4835–4852, 10.1039/C5CS00072F (2015).
Hong, G., Diao, S., Antaris, A. L. & Dai, H. Carbon Nanomaterials for Biological Imaging and Nanomedicinal Therapy. Chemical Reviews 115, 10816–10906, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00008 (2015).
Fabbro, C. et al. Targeting carbon nanotubes against cancer. Chem Commun (Camb) 48, 3911–3926, 10.1039/c2cc17995d (2012).
Wong, B. S. et al. Carbon nanotubes for delivery of small molecule drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65, 1964–2015, 10.1016/j.addr.2013.08.005 (2013).
Liu, J., Cui, L. & Losic, D. Graphene and graphene oxide as new nanocarriers for drug delivery applications. Acta biomaterialia 9, 9243–9257 (2013).
Liu, Z. & Liang, X. J. Nano-carbons as theranostics. Theranostics 2, 235–237, 10.7150/thno.4156 (2012).
Feng, L., Wu, L. & Qu, X. New Horizons for Diagnostics and Therapeutic Applications of Graphene and Graphene Oxide. Advanced Materials 25, 168–186, 10.1002/adma.201203229 (2013).
Ugarte, D. Curling and closure of graphitic networks under electron-beam irradiation. Nature 359, 707–709 (1992).
Flavin, K., Chaur, M. N., Echegoyen, L. & Giordani, S. Functionalization of multilayer fullerenes (carbon nano-onions) using diazonium compounds and “click” chemistry. Organic letters 12, 840–843, 10.1021/ol902939f (2010).
Bartelmess, J. & Giordani, S. Carbon nano-onions (multi-layer fullerenes): chemistry and applications. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 5, 1980–1998, 10.3762/bjnano.5.207 (2014).
Yang, M. et al. Functionalization of carbon nanoparticles modulates inflammatory cell recruitment and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Small 9, 4194–4206, 10.1002/smll.201300481 (2013).
Giordani, S. et al. NIR fluorescence labelled carbon nano-onions: synthesis, analysis and cellular imaging. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 2, 7459–7463, 10.1039/C4TB01087F (2014).
Bartelmess, J. et al. Boron dipyrromethene (BODIPY) functionalized carbon nano-onions for high resolution cellular imaging. Nanoscale 6, 13761–13769, 10.1039/c4nr04533e (2014).
Bartelmess, J. et al. Non-covalent functionalization of carbon nano-onions with pyrene-BODIPY dyads for biological imaging. RSC Advances 5, 50253–50258, 10.1039/C5RA07683H (2015).
Marco, F., Viviana, M., Juergen, B., Luis, E. & Silvia, G. Highly surface functionalized carbon nano-onions for bright light bioimaging. Methods and Applications in Fluorescence 3, 044005 (2015).
Frasconi, M. et al. Multi-Functionalized Carbon Nano-onions as Imaging Probes for Cancer Cells. Chemistry – A European Journal 21, 19071–19080, 10.1002/chem.201503166 (2015).
Hirata, A., Igarashi, M. & Kaito, T. Study on solid lubricant properties of carbon onions produced by heat treatment of diamond clusters or particles. Tribology International 37, 899–905, 10.1016/j.triboint.2004.07.006 (2004).
Joly-Pottuz, L. et al. Friction Properties of Carbon Nano-Onions from Experiment and Computer Simulations. Tribology Letters 37, 75–81, 10.1007/s11249-009-9492-9 (2009).
Keller, N. et al. The Catalytic Use of Onion-Like Carbon Materials for Styrene Synthesis by Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 41, 1885–1888, 10.1002/1521-3773(20020603)41:11 < 1885::AID-ANIE1885 > 3.0.CO;2-5 (2002).
Kannari, N., Itakura, T. & Ozaki, J.-i. Electrochemical oxygen reduction activity of intermediate onion-like carbon produced by the thermal transformation of nanodiamond. Carbon 87, 415–417, 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.050 (2015).
Bartolome, J. P., Echegoyen, L. & Fragoso, A. Reactive Carbon Nano-Onion Modified Glassy Carbon Surfaces as DNA Sensors for Human Papillomavirus Oncogene Detection with Enhanced Sensitivity. Analytical Chemistry 87, 6744–6751, 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00924 (2015).
Pech, D. et al. Ultrahigh-power micrometre-sized supercapacitors based on onion-like carbon. Nat Nano 5, 651–654, 10.1038/nnano.2010.162 (2010).
Wang, Y. et al. Core-leaf onion-like carbon/MnO2 hybrid nano-urchins for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Carbon 64, 230–236, 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.057 (2013).
Mykhailiv, O., Imierska, M., Petelczyc, M., Echegoyen, L. & Plonska-Brzezinska, M. E. Chemical versus Electrochemical Synthesis of Carbon Nano-onion/Polypyrrole Composites for Supercapacitor Electrodes. Chemistry – A European Journal 21, 5783–5793, 10.1002/chem.201406126 (2015).
Bartelmess, J. et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Far-Red/NIR-Fluorescent BODIPY Dyes, Solid-State Fluorescence, and Application as Fluorescent Tags Attached to Carbon Nano-onions. Chemistry – A European Journal 21, 9727–9732, 10.1002/chem.201500877 (2015).
Nel, A., Xia, T., Madler, L. & Li, N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311, 622–627, 10.1126/science.1114397 (2006).
Wiesner, M. R., Lowry, G. V., Alvarez, P., Dionysiou, D. & Biswas, P. Assessing the risks of manufactured nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 40, 4336–4345 (2006).
Ding, L. et al. Molecular characterization of the cytotoxic mechanism of multiwall carbon nanotubes and nano-onions on human skin fibroblast. Nano Lett 5, 2448–2464, 10.1021/nl051748o (2005).
Kang, S. et al. Comparison of cellular toxicity between multi-walled carbon nanotubes and onion-like shell-shaped carbon nanoparticles. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 17, 1–11, 10.1007/s11051-015-3181-4 (2015).
Marchesano, V. et al. Impact of Carbon Nano-Onions on Hydra vulgaris as a Model Organism for Nanoecotoxicology. Nanomaterials 5, 1331 (2015).
Blechinger, S. R., Warren, J. T., Jr., Kuwada, J. Y. & Krone, P. H. Developmental toxicology of cadmium in living embryos of a stable transgenic zebrafish line. Environ Health Perspect 110, 1041–1046 (2002).
Aparicio, S. et al. Whole-genome shotgun assembly and analysis of the genome of Fugu rubripes. Science 297, 1301–1310, 10.1126/science.1072104 (2002).
Busquet, F. et al. Development of a new screening assay to identify proteratogenic substances using zebrafish danio rerio embryo combined with an exogenous mammalian metabolic activation system (mDarT). Toxicol Sci 104, 177–188, 10.1093/toxsci/kfn065 (2008).
Harper, S. L., Dahl, J. A., Maddux, B. L., Tanguay, R. L. & Hutchison, J. E. Proactively designing nanomaterials to enhance performance and minimise hazard. International Journal of Nanotechnology 5, 124–142 (2008).
Truong, L., Harper, S. L. & Tanguay, R. L. Evaluation of embryotoxicity using the zebrafish model. Methods Mol Biol 691, 271–279, 10.1007/978-1-60761-849-2_16 (2011).
Howe, K. et al. The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature 496, 498–503, 10.1038/nature12111 (2013).
Fako, V. E. & Furgeson, D. Y. Zebrafish as a correlative and predictive model for assessing biomaterial nanotoxicity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61, 478–486, 10.1016/j.addr.2009.03.008 (2009).
Ko, S. K., Chen, X., Yoon, J. & Shin, I. Zebrafish as a good vertebrate model for molecular imaging using fluorescent probes. Chem Soc Rev 40, 2120–2130, 10.1039/c0cs00118j (2011).
Parng, C., Seng, W. L., Semino, C. & McGrath, P. Zebrafish: a preclinical model for drug screening. Assay Drug Dev Technol 1, 41–48, 10.1089/154065802761001293 (2002).
Hill, A. J., Teraoka, H., Heideman, W. & Peterson, R. E. Zebrafish as a model vertebrate for investigating chemical toxicity. Toxicol Sci 86, 6–19, 10.1093/toxsci/kfi110 (2005).
Goldsmith, P. Zebrafish as a pharmacological tool: the how, why and when. Curr Opin Pharmacol 4, 504–512, 10.1016/j.coph.2004.04.005 (2004).
Heideman, W., Antkiewicz, D. S., Carney, S. A. & Peterson, R. E. Zebrafish and cardiac toxicology. Cardiovasc Toxicol 5, 203–214 (2005).
Zon, L. I. & Peterson, R. T. In vivo drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nat Rev Drug Discov 4, 35–44, 10.1038/nrd1606 (2005).
Liu, Y. et al. A progressive approach on zebrafish toward sensitive evaluation of nanoparticles’ toxicity. Integr Biol (Camb) 4, 285–291, 10.1039/c2ib00130f (2012).
Fraysse, B., Mons, R. & Garric, J. Development of a zebrafish 4-day embryo-larval bioassay to assess toxicity of chemicals. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 63, 253–267, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.10.015 (2006).
Selderslaghs, I. W., Van Rompay, A. R., De Coen, W. & Witters, H. E. Development of a screening assay to identify teratogenic and embryotoxic chemicals using the zebrafish embryo. Reprod Toxicol 28, 308–320, 10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.05.004 (2009).
Wang, Y., Seebald, J. L., Szeto, D. P. & Irudayaraj, J. Biocompatibility and Biodistribution of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Nanoprobes in Zebrafish Embryos: In vivo and Multiplex Imaging. ACS Nano 4, 4039–4053, 10.1021/nn100351h (2010).
Cioffi, C. T., Palkar, A., Melin, F., Kumbhar, A., Echegoyen, L., Melle-Franco, M., Zerbetto, F., Rahman, G. M. A., Ehli, C., Sgobba, V., Guldi D. M. & Prato, M. A carbon nano-onion-ferrocene donor-acceptor system: synthesis, characterization and properties. Chem. 15, 4419–4427, 10.1002/chem.200801818 (2009).
Westerfield, M. The zebrafish book a guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish Danio (Brachydanio) rerio (2000).
Organisation for Economic, C.-o. & Development. Test no. 236: fish embryo acute toxicity (FET) test, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264203709-en (2013).
Kang, Y.-F. et al. Carbon Quantum Dots for Zebrafish Fluorescence Imaging. Scientific Reports 5, 11835, 10.1038/srep11835 (2015).
Usenko, C. Y., Harper, S. L. & Tanguay, R. L. In vivo evaluation of carbon fullerene toxicity using embryonic zebrafish. Carbon N Y 45, 1891–1898, 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.04.021 (2007).
Usenko, C. Y., Harper, S. L. & Tanguay, R. L. Fullerene C(60) exposure elicits an oxidative stress response in embryonic zebrafish. Toxicology and applied pharmacology 229, 44–55, 10.1016/j.taap.2007.12.030 (2008).
Huichin, P., Yu-Jun, L., Meng-Wei, L., Han-Ni, C. & Cheng-Chung, C. Aquatic toxicity assessment of single-walled carbon nanotubes using zebrafish embryos. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 304, 012026 (2011).
Wang, Z. G. et al. Toxicity of Graphene Quantum Dots in Zebrafish Embryo. Biomed Environ Sci 28, 341–351, 10.3967/bes2015.048 (2015).
Chen, Y., Hu, X., Sun, J. & Zhou, Q. Specific nanotoxicity of graphene oxide during zebrafish embryogenesis. Nanotoxicology, 1–11, 10.3109/17435390.2015.1005032 (2015).
Jeong, J. et al. In vivo toxicity assessment of angiogenesis and the live distribution of nano-graphene oxide and its PEGylated derivatives using the developing zebrafish embryo. Carbon 93, 431–440, 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.024 (2015).
Cheng, J., Flahaut, E. & Cheng, S. H. Effect of carbon nanotubes on developing zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Environ Toxicol Chem 26, 708–716 (2007).
Nativo, P., Prior, I. A. & Brust, M. Uptake and Intracellular Fate of Surface-Modified Gold Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2, 1639–1644, 10.1021/nn800330a (2008).
Jin, H., Heller, D. A., Sharma, R. & Strano, M. S. Size-dependent cellular uptake and expulsion of single-walled carbon nanotubes: single particle tracking and a generic uptake model for nanoparticles. ACS Nano 3, 149–158, 10.1021/nn800532m (2009).
Huisken, J., Swoger, J., Del Bene, F., Wittbrodt, J. & Stelzer, E. H. Optical sectioning deep inside live embryos by selective plane illumination microscopy. Science 305, 1007–1009, 10.1126/science.1100035 (2004).
Handy, R., Henry, T., Scown, T., Johnston, B. & Tyler, C. Manufactured nanoparticles: their uptake and effects on fish—a mechanistic analysis. Ecotoxicology 17, 396–409 (2008).
Palkar, A. et al. Reactivity differences between carbon nano onions (CNOs) prepared by different methods. Chem Asian J 2, 625–633, 10.1002/asia.200600426 (2007).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT) for funding. The authors wish to thank Prof. Luis Echegoyen (UTEP) for the pristine CNOs, Dr. Zhiya Dang (IIT) for support with HRTEM, Dr. Zeno Lavagnino (IIT) for setting up the iSPIM, Dr. Luca Lanzanò (IIT) for fruitful discussions, Prof. Liberato Manna (IIT), Dr. Teresa Pellegrino (IIT) and the Nanochemistry technicians for the Facility support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.d.A. and S.G. conceived the idea. M.d.A., M.R., J.B., F.C.Z., A.D. and S.G. designed the experiments. J.B. functionalized the CNOs. M.R. performed DLS, zeta potential and TEM experiments. R.B. performed HR-TEM experiments. M.d.A. performed all the biological experiments. G.S. acquired and analyzed iSPIM images. M.d.A., J.B. and S.G. wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
d’ Amora, M., Rodio, M., Bartelmess, J. et al. Biocompatibility and biodistribution of functionalized carbon nano-onions (f-CNOs) in a vertebrate model. Sci Rep 6, 33923 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33923
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33923
This article is cited by
-
A Critical Review on Nano-selenium Based Materials: Synthesis, Biomedicine Applications and Biocompatibility Assessment
Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials (2024)
-
One-step hydrothermal synthesis of carbon nano onions anchored on graphene sheets for potential use in electrochemical energy storage
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2022)
-
Zebrafish: A Promising Real-Time Model System for Nanotechnology-Mediated Neurospecific Drug Delivery
Nanoscale Research Letters (2021)
-
Diversity-oriented synthesis of blue emissive nitrogen heterocycles and their conjugation with carbon nano-onions
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering (2020)
-
Combined study of the ground and excited states in the transformation of nanodiamonds into carbon onions by electron energy-loss spectroscopy
Scientific Reports (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.