HLA class I (HLA-I) transgenic mice have proven to be useful models for studying human MHC-related immune responses over the last two decades. However, differences in the processing and presentation machinery between humans and mice may have profound effects on HLA-I restricted antigen presentation. In this study, we generated a novel human TAP-LMP (hTAP-LMP) gene cluster transgenic mouse model carrying an intact human TAP complex and two human immunoproteasome LMP subunits, PSMB8/PSMB9. By crossing the hTAP-LMP strain with different HLA-I transgenic mice, we found that the expression levels of human HLA-I molecules, especially the A3 supertype members (e.g., A11 and A33), were remarkably enhanced in corresponding HLA-I/hTAP-LMP transgenic mice. Moreover, we found that humanized processing and presentation machinery increased antigen presentation of HLA-A11-restricted epitopes and promoted the rapid reduction of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP mice. Together, our study highlights that HLA-I/hTAP-LMP mice are an improved model for studying antigen presentation of HLA-I molecules and their related CTL responses.
Human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) molecules that present antigenic peptides to CD8+ T cells and trigger the cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response are essential for the human immune system to combat viral infections and clear transformed tumor cells1,2. A better understanding of HLA-I-related antigen processing and presentation would improve the rational design of preventive or therapeutic vaccines against viral infection and cancer. Early studies using HLA-I transfected into murine cells3,4, as well as later efforts utilizing HLA-I transgenic mice5,6,7, have provided a wealth of knowledge about the antigen presentation of different HLA-I molecules. However, existing differences between humans and HLA-I transgenic mice make it difficult to determine whether responses in the transgenic mice exactly reflect responses in humans8. Distinctions between the mouse and human antigen processing and presentation machinery may account for some of these differences8.
In both humans and mice, the MHC class I antigen presentation pathway proceeds through several stages9,10: i) endogenous proteins in the cytosol are degraded into short peptides of 3–22 residues by the proteasome or immunoproteasome; ii) peptide products of 8–12 amino acids are transported into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by a dimer complex, the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP); and iii) empty MHC class I molecules in the ER are stabilized by binding to suitable peptides to form peptide-MHC complexes, which are then exported to the cell surface for presentation to CD8+ T cells. The TAP complex, which is composed of TAP1 and TAP2, is essential for peptide transportation into the ER, where the peptides bind to MHC class I molecules. Deficiency of TAP1 and/or TAP2 in mice and humans results in a severe defects in MHC class I antigen presentation and a substantial reduction in CD8+ T-cell numbers11,12,13,14,15.
Previous studies of human or animal TAP transportation demonstrate that the TAP complex selects peptides with preferential sequences and TAP binding affinity has a significant impact on epitope presentation16,17,18,19,20,21. A minimal TAP affinity is required for peptide presentation. Epitopes with high TAP affinity can easily to be selected and recognized by CTLs. Interestingly, the peptide binding specificities between human and mouse TAP are quite different. The murine TAP displays strong specificity for binding to peptides with hydrophobic C-termini and the human TAP demonstrates a more permissive preference in binding to peptides with both hydrophobic and basic termini20. Aside from differences in TAP specificity, the immunoproteasome and TAP binding protein (tapasin) also display differences between humans and mice22,23.
HLA molecules are extremely polymorphic; >10,000 alleles have been found to date24. Nine major HLA-I supertypes are classified according to their structural similarities in the antigen binding groove and overlapping peptide binding properties25. Among these supertypes, B7, A3, A2, A24, B44, A1 and B27 are the most prevalent in different ethnic groups25. Interestingly, HLA-A3, A24 and B27 binding peptides have higher affinity for human TAP than that of HLA-A2 and B726, supporting the notion that particular HLA-I molecules co-evolved with TAP for efficient peptide processing and presentation.
The A3 supertype alleles are found in all major ethnic groups worldwide, with an average frequency of 44.2%, whereas a higher frequency of 52.7% is found in the Chinese population25. Alleles of this supertype, including HLA-A*0301, A*1101, A*3101, A*3301 and A*6801, share a specificity for binding to peptides with small or aliphatic residues at position 2 and basic residues at the C-terminus27. In accordance with this property, antigen presentation of A3 supertype alleles is more dependent on human TAP than alleles of other supertypes28. A representative mouse model, the HLA-A11 transgenic mouse, has been generated and used to study HLA-A11 antigen presentation and related CTL responses5. Although A11-restricted CTL responses are elicited following direct peptide immunization, these animals fail to generate adequate HLA-A11-restricted CTL responses during influenza virus infection5. Another study also supports the same notion that HLA-A11 transgenic mice have low efficiency in transporting HLA-A11-restricted epitopes, likely due to lack of human TAP29.
The TAP1 and TAP2 genes are tightly linked to the genes encoding the two catalytic subunits of the immunoproteasome, PSMB9 (LMP2) and PSMB8 (LMP7), which preferentially create antigenic peptides30. The close linkage of the TAP-LMP genes is highly conserved, being found in almost all species of vertebrates examined. Interestingly, TAP-LMP is also closely associated with MHC-I in ectothermic vertebrates such as bony fish, sharks and amphibians, forming a compact class I unit. However, in most mammals, the TAP-LMP gene cluster is separated from class I genes, located in the class II region, which likely allowed for a more permissive evolution30.
Here, we generated a novel human TAP-LMP transgenic mouse (hTAP-LMP) by microinjection of the 180-kb human BAC (bacterial artificial chromosome) RP11–10A19, which carries the genes encoding intact TAP-LMP (TAP1, TAP2, PSMB8 and PSMB9). The resultant mice were crossed to various HLA-I transgenic mice to evaluate the effects of human TAP-LMP on HLA-I antigen presentation and HLA-I-restricted CTL responses. We found that the expression levels of human HLA-I, especially the A3 supertype and the HLA-A11-restricted CTL response were notably enhanced by expression of the humanized processing and presenting machinery. Our study highlights the notion that particular HLA-I molecules co-evolved with hTAP-LMP for efficient peptide processing and presentation and emphasizes that HLA-I/hTAP-LMP mice are improved models for studying antigen presentation of HLA-I molecules and their related immune responses.
Generation of hTAP-LMP transgenic mice
Differences between human and mouse antigen processing and presentation machinery raise the possibility that HLA-I-restricted antigen presentation is not intact in HLA-I transgenic mice8. Thus, we generated a novel humanized TAP-LMP transgenic mouse by microinjecting pronuclei with a human BAC clone (RP11-10A19) encoding the intact hTAP-LMP gene cluster (Fig. 1A). Sequence alignment of BAC RP11-10A19 revealed that this BAC clone carries TAP1*0101 and TAP2*0201, both of which occur at high frequencies in different human populations31,32. By using PCR screening, two founder mice (F2 and F14) carrying all six human genes were established (Fig. 1B). mRNA and protein expression of human TAP1, TAP2, PSMB8 and PSMB9 in both founder mice were further confirmed by using real-time PCR and western blotting, respectively (Fig. 1C,D). Additionally, the human TAP1 mRNA expression level in the transgenic mice was approximately equal to that in human PBMC (Supplementary Fig. S1). Transgenic expression of this hTAP-LMP gene cluster had little effect on mouse T cell homeostasis, as indicated by the normal percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells found in the spleens and thymus of hTAP-LMP transgenic mice (Fig. 1E and Supplementary Fig. S2). The transgenic mice of the F14 founder were kept and used in further experiments.
Enhancement of HLA class I expression in HLA-I/hTAP-LMP transgenic mice
We next set out to test whether expression of the hTAP-LMP gene cluster promoted HLA-I-restricted antigen presentation. HLA-A3 supertypes, including A11 and A33, which prefer to bind peptides with small or aliphatic residues at position 2 and basic residues at the C-terminus (R or K)27, are more likely to rely on human TAP than other HLA supertypes. In addition, an HLA-A11 transgenic mouse that is a representative mouse model for the A3 supertype displays a defect in processing natural A11-restricted epitopes5,29. Therefore, hTAP-LMP mice were crossed with HLA-A11 transgenic mice to generate HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP double transgenic mice and endogenous antigen presentation was evaluated by surface staining of HLA-A11. We found that the expression of surface mouse class I (H2-Kb) protein and mRNA was not significantly affected by transgenic expression of hTAP-LMP (Fig. 2A,B). In contrast, surface HLA-A11 molecules but not their mRNA levels were strikingly increased in the HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP transgenic animals (Fig. 2C,D). Indeed, approximately four-fold higher HLA-A11 levels were found in the HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP animals than the control HLA-A11 mice (Fig. 2D). This result suggests that reconstitution of humanized TAP-LMP enabled more HLA-A11-matched peptides to be transported into the ER to stabilize HLA-A11 molecules and increase their restricted antigen display.
The promotion of HLA-I antigen presentation by hTAP-LMP was highly selective, as we also found dramatic enhancement of another member of the A3 subtype, HLA-A33 molecules, in the HLA-A33/hTAP-LMP double transgenic mice (Fig. 2E), whereas the surface presentation of HLA-A2 only showed a slight up-regulation in HLA-A2/hTAP-LMP mice (Fig. 2F). This is consistent with their different peptide binding preferences (i.e., binding to peptides with positive charges at their C-termini). The HLA-A2 molecule also has its own peptide in the signal sequence that does not require cytosolic processing or TAP transport33,34 and, thus, is less affected by the transgenic hTAP-LMP genes.
Increased CTL responses against HLA-A11-restricted epitopes in the HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP mice
To test whether the introduction of the human TAP-LMP gene cluster would have an impact on HLA-A11-restricted CTL responses and to better establish a link between TAP affinity, HLA-I expression and CTL responses, we utilized DNA vaccination to allow antigens to be processed and presented in the intracellular pathway. HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP mice were prime-boost immunized via intramuscular injection of plasmid pcDNA3.1(+)/HBcAg, which encodes the full-length hepatitis B virus core antigen (HBcAg) (Fig. 3A). HLA-A11-restricted CTLs were evaluated by Elispot assays and intracellular IFN-γ cytokine staining (ICS). Two known HLA-A11-restricted epitopes, HBc141–151 (STLPETTVVRR)5 with high affinity to human TAP (TAP score 0.67, IEDB Analysis Resource, http://tools.iedb.org/processing/) and HBc88–96 (YVNTNMGLK)35 with low TAP affinity (TAP score 0.15), as well as 19 peptides (Table 1) with K/R C-termini that potentially elicit HLA-A11-restricted CTL responses, were synthesized and used in the Elispot assays (Fig. 3B). Initially, the 19 peptides were divided into three pools for ex vivo stimulation (Table 1). Because mouse class I molecules prefer to bind peptides with hydrophobic C-termini, the studied peptides were unlikely to trigger mouse class I-restricted CTLs.
Consistent with a previous influenza virus infection model5, only weak HLA-A11-restricted CTL responses were detected by Elispot assays in the A11 transgenic mice following DNA vaccination (Fig. 3B above). However, much stronger CTL responses against HBc141–151 (but not HBc88–96) and pool 2 peptides were found in HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP mice (Fig. 3B above). Interestingly, further analysis revealed that the only peptide from pool 2 that was capable of stimulating the IFN-γ response was HBc142–152 (Fig. 3B below). The HBc142–152 peptide was derived from the same region as HBc141–151, with the differences being that it lacks a serine at its N-terminus and has an additional arginine at its C-terminus. This suggests that HLA-A11-restricted epitopes in the HBcAg DNA vaccination model dominantly reside between residues 141 and 152. Moreover, a much higher number of HBc141–151 epitope-specific CTLs detected via ICS was also found in HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP mice, highlighting the importance of humanized TAP-LMP in the HLA-A11-dependent CTL response (Fig. 3C).
Similarly, by DNA vaccination of another plasmid encoding a minigene that contains a known HLA-A11-restricted epitope, NP91–100 (RTGGPIYRR)36 with high TAP affinity (TAP score 0.62), a stronger NP91–100-specific CTL response was also found in HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP mice as analyzed by ICS (Fig. 3D, left and middle panel) and IFN-γ Elispot assays (Fig. 3D, right panel). We then detected the CTL responses to the HLA-A2 restricted epitope HBc18–27 (FLPSDFFPSV) with low TAP affinity (TAP score 0.07)37. There was no significant difference between HLA-A2/hTAP-LMP mice and HLA-A2 mice (Supplementary Fig. S3). Overall, our results indicated that the introduction of hTAP-LMP prompts better intracellular antigen presentation of HLA-A11 molecules and notably improved HLA-A11-restricted CTL responses to epitopes with high affinity for human TAP.
Antigen presentation of HLA-A11-restricted epitopes in a long peptide vaccine elicited anti-viral immunity
HBc141–151 is a CTL epitope shared by other class I alleles in the HLA-A3 supertype5,38. In addition, this epitope elicits a specific CTL response that is correlated with HBV clearance39,40. To explore the possibility of boosting the HBc141–151-specific CTL response as an intervention method to inhibit hepatitis B virus infection, we designed a long peptide vaccine containing residues 123–157 of HBcAg (HBc123–157, Fig. 4A), which encompassed the HBc141–151 CTL epitope. Unlike short peptides, long peptide vaccines (which are capable of forming tertiary structure to protect the peptides from exopeptidase degradation41) are predicted to be internalized and cross-presented by professional APCs. To test potential advantages of the long peptide HBc123–157, HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP mice and a control strain were subcutaneously immunized with the long peptide HBc123–157. Two weeks later, hydrodynamic injection (HDI) of pAAV/HBV1.2 was used to mimic HBV infection in vivo42 (Fig. 4A). The plasmid pAAV/HBV1.2 contains a replication-complement HBV DNA sequence that can mimic HBV infection after liver-targeting HDI into mice. The mouse models will help to further explore new treatment of HBV infections42.
The HBc141–151-specific CTL response was determined by ICS and serum HBV surface protein (HBsAg) levels were evaluated by ELISAs 7 days later. After HDI, much higher numbers of HBc141–151-specific IFN-γ secreting CD8+ T cells were found in splenocytes from HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP mice (Fig. 4B), which was inversely correlated with the serum HBsAg levels (Fig. 4C,D). IFN-γ secreting CD8+ T cells were HLA-A11 Tetramer+ ki67+ and also expressed cytotoxicity marker CD107a, indicated they are bona fide CTL (Supplementary Fig. S4).These results thus demonstrated that the long peptide vaccination boosted a functional HBc141–151-specific CTL response that promoted HBV clearance in vivo. Our results emphasize that the HLA-I/hTAP-LMP mouse model is an advanced experimental model for assessing HLA-I-restricted CTLs in response to naturally processed epitopes, which can be used as a new vaccine development platform in the future.
In the last two decades, HLA-I transgenic mice have proven to be a unique in vivo model to study human class I-restricted CTL responses in various infectious diseases6,29, as well as cancer immunotherapy43. However, the murine antigen processing and presentation machinery is not capable of completely mimicking human HLA-I-restricted antigen presentation. In this study, a novel BAC transgenic mouse carrying the human TAP1, TAP2, PSMB8 and PSMB9 genes (hTAP-LMP mice) was generated and we found that reconstitution of the hTAP-LMP gene cluster notably improved human HLA-I antigen presentation and restricted CTL responses. This effect was especially evident in the A3 supertype. Our data support the notion that particular HLA-I molecules co-evolved with TAP-LMP for efficient peptide processing and presentation. This research also highlights the potential for HLA-I/hTAP-LMP mice as an improved experimental model for studying antigen presentation of HLA-I molecules and their related immune responses.
HBV infection is the most common liver disease in the world. More than 350 million individuals are infected with HBV and the estimated number in China alone is close to 100 million44,45. HLA A*1101, a member of the A3 supertype, is the major HLA-I allele in chronic hepatitis B patients from China46. Thus, identification of HLA-A*11:01-restricted HBV epitopes that can boost protective CTL responses are important for the treatment of chronic HBV infection. Here, using our novel HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP mice, we demonstrated that a long peptide vaccine containing residues 123–157 of HBcAg (HBc123–157) could be efficiently presented to APCs and elicit protective HBc141–151-specific CTL responses. Thus, HBc123–157 could have important therapeutic potential in preventing HBV infection. This result also suggests that the long peptide was more efficiently cross-presented in HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP mice, which is consistent with previous research showing that cross antigen presentation of long peptides is dependent on proteasome and TAP function47. However, a recent study by Ma et al.48 found that cross-presentation of long peptides requires a vacuolar pathway that depends on newly synthesized MHC class I molecules but not the proteasome or TAP molecules48. Thus, further studies are needed to clarify whether enhanced cross antigen presentation of long peptides in HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP mice is associated with transgenic human TAP and LMP molecules.
Because the TAP-LMP gene cluster plays important roles in HLA-I antigen presentation30, future studies on the effect of hTAP-LMP on HLA-I-related human diseases are particularly interesting. HLA-A33 molecules are related to susceptibility to persistent infection by HBV49,50 and Enterovirus 71 infection51. It will be of great interest to use both HLA-A33/hTAP-LMP and HLA-A33 transgenic mice to study the contributions of HLA-A33 molecules to virus infection.
Though the TAP and LMP molecules are tightly linked as a gene cluster in HLA-I/hTAP-LMP mice, it is interesting to clarify their different contributions to antigen presentation of HLA-I molecules. One of the most obvious effects from the transgenes is that the HLA-A11 expression levels were dramatically elevated in HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP mice. To determine whether this effect is due to the human TAP transgene, splenocytes of HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP mice were infected with a retrovirus expressing a HSV-2 protein ICP47-2 which was reported to specifically inhibit human TAP52. Interestingly, HLA-A11 expression was reduced robustly and sensitively in splenocytes that were successfully infected by ICP47-2 exressing virus, while the H2-Kb expression displayed a less sensitive manner (Supplementary Fig. S5). The reduction of H2-Kb expression was expected because ICP47-2 also inhibits murine TAP transport52. Importantly, in a previous study, inhibition of human TAP by ICP47 molecules cound downregulate HLA class I in human cells53. Thus, it is quite possible that transgenic human TAP molecules make a substantial contribution to the elevation of HLA-A11 molecules and the induction of strong CTL responses. Regardless, whether the human LMP molecules have a similar effect is uncertain and will be tested in further studies.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that HLA-I/hTAP-LMP transgenic mice are an efficient in vivo model for studying HLA-I antigen presentation and CTL responses. We expect that these mice will be useful tools for future vaccine development and cancer immunotherapy.
DNA Constructs and peptides
The bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone RP11-10A19 was purchased from CHORI (Oakland, CA, USA), pAAV/HBV1.2 was kindly provided by Pei-Jer Chen42, pcDNA3.1(+)/HBc (type D) was kindly provided by Songdong Meng and pcDNA3.1(+)/minigene encoding the peptide NP91–100 was constructed in the lab. The peptides HBc141–151 (STLPETTVVRR), NP91–100 (KTGGPIYRR), HBc128–140 (TPPAYRPPNAPIL), HBc123–157 (GVWIRTPPAYRPPNAPILSTLPETTVVRRRDRGRS) and the 19 peptides with K/R C-termini were synthesized by the Beijing Xuheyuan Company with a purity of >90%.
BAC RP11-10A19 was microinjected into pronuclei of fertilized B6 × DBAF1 mouse oocytes to generate human TAP transgenic mice (hTAP-LMP mice). The hTAP-LMP mice were further back crossed at least seven generations to C57BL/6. HLA-A2 transgenic mice in the C57BL/6 background were kindly provided by Songdong Meng’s lab. HLA-A11 transgenic mice were purchased from Taconic (Model# 9660). HLA-A33 transgenic mice were generated in our lab by microinjection of the Rosa26 BAC (RP24-85L15 CHORI, Oakland, CA, USA) inserted with a HLA-A*3303/Kb fused gene into pronuclei of fertilized B6 × DBAF1 mouse oocytes and the mice were back crossed at least seven generations to C57BL/6. HLA-A2/hTAP-LMP, HLA-A11/hTAP-LMP and HLA-A33/hTAP-LMP mice were obtained by crossing HLA-A2, HLA-A11 and HLA-A33 mice with hTAP-LMP mice, respectively. All transgenic mice were maintained as heterozygotes. All mice were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions at the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences in accordance with the guidelines for care and use of laboratory animals established by the Beijing Association for Laboratory Animal Science. All mouse experiments were performed in accordance with the “Regulation of the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences of Research Ethics Committee”. The protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (permit number PZIMCAS2012003).
PCR and western blotting
The primers for PCR genotyping of hTAP-LMP mice were: TAP1-F: 5′-GCCTCTTATCGTGTGCTTCT-3′, TAP1-R: 5′-CCATCTCCACCCAAGGTC-3′; TAP2-F: 5′-CGCCCACAGTGTTAGGT-3′, TAP2-R: 5′-GAAGAGGCGTTTGGAATAG-3′; PSMB8-F: 5′-AGTACGTCAGGTATTTAGC-3′, PSMB8-R: 5′-GAGGGAGTAGGAGTATATG-3′; PSMB9-F: 5′-CACTTAATGTCTCAGTGGGA-3′, PSMB9-R: 5′-TATTTCTCTTCCTGTTCCTC-3′; HLA-DOB-F: 5′-TAAACGTGTCTGGTATGTC-3′, HLA-DOB-R: 5′-AGTTAAAGATGAATCTGACC-3′; HLA-DMB-F: 5′-CAAAGGAACATCCAGATGAAG-3′ and HLA-DMB-R: 5′-TCCCCCATACTCCCTGAAG-3′. The PCR products were 319, 234, 438, 289, 347 and 228 bp for human TAP1, TAP2, PSMB8, PSMB9, HLA-DOB and HLA-DMB, respectively.
Lysates of splenocytes from hTAP-LMP mice were used to detect human TAP1, TAP2, PSMB8 and PSMB9 expression by western blotting. An anti-human TAP1 mAb (clone 148.3, Cat MABF125, Merck Millipore), anti-human TAP2 mAb (clone TAP2.17, MBL), anti-human PSMB8 mAb (clone 1A5, CST) and anti-human PSMB9 mAb (clone 792520, R&D) were used as primary antibodies and anti-mouse IgG/HRP (ZDR-5307, ZSGB-BIO, Beijing) was used as the secondary antibody. The mouse anti-β-actin antibody (DKM9001, Tianjin Sungene Biotech) was used to detect β-actin as an internal reference.
Immunization and HDI
For intramuscular immunization, 100 μg of DNA vaccine (pcDNA3.1(+)/HBcAg or pcDNA3.1(+)/minigene) dissolved in 100 μL of PBS was injected into the tibialis anterior muscle (50 μL per leg), followed with electroporation at the injection site42. The injection was performed twice within a 2-week interval. Eleven days after the last injection, the mice were sacrificed and splenocytes were used to analyze peptide-specific CTLs by IFN-γ Elispot or IFN-γ ICS. Subcutaneous immunization of peptides was performed as previously described5 with some modifications. Briefly, HBc123–157 (100 μg/mouse) and the helper IAb-restricted epitope HBc128–140 (100 μg/mouse) in PBS/5% DMSO were emulsified with IFA and subcutaneously injected (s.c.) into the base of the tail. Two weeks after vaccination, the mice were hydrodynamically injected with pAAV/HBV1.2 plasmids (10 μg/mouse) in PBS with a volume (mL) equivalent to 8% of the mouse body weight (g), as previously described42. The mice were sacrificed 7 days later and splenocytes were used to analyze CTL responses by IFN- γ ICS. The serum from day 7 after HDI was used to analyze HBsAg levels by ELISA (SHANGHAI KEHUA BIO-ENGINEERING CO., LTD).
The antibodies used for surface staining were anti-HLA-A2 FITC (clone BB7.2, Biolegend), anti-HLA ABC FITC (clone B9.12.1, Beckman), anti-mouse H2-Kb PE (clone AF6-88.5, Biolegend), anti-mouse CD4 APC (clone GK1.5, Biolegend), anti-mouse CD8 FITC (PE) (clone 53–6.7, Biolegend) and anti-mouse/human B220 PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone RA3-6B2, eBioscience). All surface staining was performed in the dark at 4 °C for 20 min. Mouse IFN-γ staining was performed in the dark at 4 °C for 30 min using anti-mouse IFN-γ APC (clone XMG1.2, eBioscience). After washing, cells were analyzed using a FACS Calibur (BD).
ICS & Elispot
IFN-γ ICS was performed as described54. Briefly, splenocytes were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS and 106 splenocytes per well were incubated in 96-well round-bottom plates (Costar) with the designated concentration of peptides in the presence of monensin (Biolegend) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 5 h. Subsequently, cells were stained for surface markers at 4 °C for 30 min, washed twice, fixed with 4% fixation buffer PFA at room temperature for 8 min, permeabilized with Perm buffer (0.1% Saponin in FACS buffer) and stained for intracellular IFN-γ using anti-mouse IFN-γ APC. After washing twice with Perm buffer, cells were suspended in FACS buffer and analyzed using a FACS Calibur (BD). When co-staining with mouse CD107a, 2 μL of FITC anti-mouse CD107a (clone 1D4B, Cat 121606, Biolegend) was added at the beginning of culturing.
Biotinylated HLA-A*11:01-STLPETTVVRR monomers were kindly provided by the NIH Tetramer Core Facility. Tetramer-HLA-A11-HBc141–151 was synthesized from monomers and APC Streptavidin (Cat 405207, Biolegend). Tetramer staining was performed in the dark at 4 °C for 30 min together with surface antibodies.
Mouse IFN-γ Elispot assays were performed according to the manufacturer‘s instructions (BD). Briefly, 4 × 105 or 5 × 105 splenocytes per well were incubated with the designated concentration of peptides at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 20 h. The plates were then developed according to the manual and analyzed with an ImmunoSpot S5 Versa Analyzer (CTL). Results of spot-forming cells per well were transformed into spots/106 cells.
Isolation of PBMCs from whole blood
Human Peripheral blood (5 mL each) was obtained after signed, informed consent from two adult normal donors using a protocol approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. All methods involving human subjects or donors were performed in accordance with the “Regulation of the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences of Research Ethics Committee”. Peripheral blood (~0.3 mL each) from three hTAP-LMP mice were collected from tail vein in presence of EDTA as anticoagulant. Both human and mouse peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained by Ficoll centrifugation (Tian Jin Hao Yang BIOLOGICAL Manufacture. CO., LTD, LTS1077 for human and LTS1092 for mouse). Briefly, the blood was diluted with PBS (1:1 for human and 1:10 for mouse) and then carefully layered over the Ficoll medium (15 mL for human and 3 mL for mouse) in Falcon tube. The tube was then centrifuged at 500 g at room temperature for 20 min, no break. The PBMCs layer was then carefully transferred to a new Falcon tube and washed twice by PBS. The cells were counted and used for mRNA extraction (1*106 cells/sample).
RNA preparation and real-time PCR
Total mRNA from 5 × 106 splenocytes/mouse was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). A 2.5-μg aliquot of total mRNA per mouse was reverse-transcribed into cDNA (SuperScript III, Invitrogen). Specified mRNA expression was then analyzed by real-time PCR using a LightCycler480 System (Roche Applied Science), with a duplicate reaction volume of 10 μL for each well containing 5 μL of Mix 1, 2.5 μL of Mix 2 (Lightcycler480 Probe Master Mix kit, Roche 04707494001), 0.2 μL of probe (Taqman), 0.8 μL of primers, 0.5 μL of ddH2O and 1 μL of 10-fold diluted cDNA. The reaction program was 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1 s. The mRNA levels of different genes were analyzed by normalization against levels of 18S rRNA. The primers (and probes) used were: 5′-TCTCGCTGTTCCTGGTCCTGG-3′ and 5′-GTATCGGCTGAGCCATCTTGT-3′ for human TAP1 (probe #55), 5′-GGATGAAAAGCCCATCTCAC-3′ and 5′-GCTCCTGCCCAACTGAAAC-3′ for human TAP2 (probe #76), 5′-AAATGGAGAACGTATTTCA-3′ and 5′-CACGTAGTAGAGTCCAGGA-3′ for human PSMB8 (probe #5), 5′-ACCAACCGGGGACTTACC-3′ and 5′-ACCGCCTCGCCTGCAGACACT-3′ for human PSMB9 (probe #7), 5′-GTGATCTCTGGCTGTGAAGT-3′ and 5′-CTCCCACTTGTGTTTGGTGA-3′ for H2-Kb (probe #70), 5′-TAATGTATGGCTGCGACGTG-3′ and 5′-TCAGGGCGATGTAATCCTTG-3′ for HLA-A11 (probe #69) and 5′-GCAATTATTCCCCATGAACG-3′ and 5′-GGGACTTAATCAACGCAAGC-3′ for 18S rRNA (probe #48).
The ICP47-2 gene (GeneID:1487353, 261 bp) was synthesized by the Sangon Biotech Company (Shanghai) and inserted into the MSCV-IRES-NGFR (Addgene 27489) to construct MSCV-ICP47-NGFR. Virus production and infection was performed as described55 with some modifications. Briefly, 1.5 × 106 of plat-E cells (producer cells) in a 6-well plate were co-transfected with 3 μg of MSCV-IRES-NGFR or MSCV-ICP47-NGFR and 1 μg of pCL-Eco plasmid using the Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Cat 11668-019, Invitrogen). Viral supernatants were harvested 48 hours later and used to infect splenocytes activated by coated anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibodies for 48 hours. Forty hours after virus infection, the splenocytes were collected and stained for HLA-A11 and NGFR expression level with anti-HLA ABC FITC antibody (clone B9.12.1, Beckman) and anti-human NGFR APC (clone ME20.4, Biolegend). Cells successfully infected by MSCV-ICP47-NGFR or MSCV-IRES-NGFR virus will be detected as NGFR positive.
FACS data were collected and processed using FACS analysis software (FlowJo). Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v6. The p values were determined using unpaired t tests; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
How to cite this article: Huang, M. et al. Improved Transgenic Mouse Model for Studying HLA Class I Antigen Presentation. Sci. Rep. 6, 33612; doi: 10.1038/srep33612 (2016).
Townsend, A. R. et al. The epitopes of influenza nucleoprotein recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes can be defined with short synthetic peptides. Cell 44, 959–968 (1986).
Traversari, C. et al. A nonapeptide encoded by human gene MAGE-1 is recognized on HLA-A1 by cytolytic T lymphocytes directed against tumor antigen MZ2-E. J Exp Med 176, 1453–1457 (1992).
Paul, P. et al. Serological expression after sequential double transfection with purified HLA-A11 gene of mouse fibroblasts carrying human beta-2 microglobulin. Immunogenetics 22, 1–8 (1985).
Gomard, E. et al. Murine cells expressing an HLA molecule are specifically lysed by HLA-restricted antiviral human T cells. Nature 319, 153–154, doi: 10.1038/319153a0 (1986).
Alexander, J. et al. Derivation of HLA-A11/Kb transgenic mice: functional CTL repertoire and recognition of human A11-restricted CTL epitopes. J Immunol 159, 4753–4761 (1997).
Vitiello, A., Marchesini, D., Furze, J., Sherman, L. A. & Chesnut, R. W. Analysis of the HLA-restricted influenza-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte response in transgenic mice carrying a chimeric human-mouse class I major histocompatibility complex. J Exp Med 173, 1007–1015 (1991).
Alexander, J., Oseroff, C., Sidney, J. & Sette, A. Derivation of HLA-B*0702 transgenic mice: functional CTL repertoire and recognition of human B*0702-restricted CTL epitopes. Hum Immunol 64, 211–223 (2003).
Kotturi, M. F. et al. Of mice and humans: how good are HLA transgenic mice as a model of human immune responses? Immunome Res 5, 3, doi: 10.1186/1745-7580-5-3 (2009).
Monaco, J. J. Pathways for the processing and presentation of antigens to T cells. J Leukoc Biol 57, 543–547 (1995).
Pamer, E. & Cresswell, P. Mechanisms of MHC class I–restricted antigen processing. Annu Rev Immunol 16, 323–358, doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.323 (1998).
Sandberg, J. K., Chambers, B. J., Van Kaer, L., Karre, K. & Ljunggren, H. G. TAP1-deficient mice select a CD8+ T cell repertoire that displays both diversity and peptide specificity. Eur J Immunol 26, 288–293, doi: 10.1002/eji.1830260203 (1996).
Theodoratos, A. et al. Mouse strains with point mutations in TAP1 and TAP2. Immunol Cell Biol 88, 72–78, doi: 10.1038/icb.2009.61 (2010).
Van Kaer, L., Ashton-Rickardt, P. G., Ploegh, H. L. & Tonegawa, S. TAP1 mutant mice are deficient in antigen presentation, surface class I molecules and CD4-8+ T cells. Cell 71, 1205–1214 (1992).
de la Salle, H. et al. Homozygous human TAP peptide transporter mutation in HLA class I deficiency. Science 265, 237–241 (1994).
Moins-Teisserenc, H. T. et al. Association of a syndrome resembling Wegener's granulomatosis with low surface expression of HLA class-I molecules. Lancet 354, 1598–1603 (1999).
Neefjes, J. et al. Analysis of the fine specificity of rat, mouse and human TAP peptide transporters. Eur J Immunol 25, 1133–1136, doi: 10.1002/eji.1830250444 (1995).
van Endert, P. M. et al. The peptide-binding motif for the human transporter associated with antigen processing. J Exp Med 182, 1883–1895 (1995).
Powis, S. J. et al. The rat cim effect: TAP allele-dependent changes in a class I MHC anchor motif and evidence against C-terminal trimming of peptides in the ER. Immunity 4, 159–165, doi: S1074-7613(00)80680-9 (1996).
Fruci, D. et al. Quantifying recruitment of cytosolic peptides for HLA class I presentation: impact of TAP transport. J Immunol 170, 2977–2984 (2003).
Burgevin, A. et al. A detailed analysis of the murine TAP transporter substrate specificity. PLoS One 3, e2402, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002402 (2008).
Tregaskes, C. A. et al. Surface expression, peptide repertoire and thermostability of chicken class I molecules correlate with peptide transporter specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113, 692–697, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511859113 (2016).
Braud, V. M., McMichael, A. J. & Cerundolo, V. Differential processing of influenza nucleoprotein in human and mouse cells. Eur J Immunol 28, 625–635, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199802)28:02<625::AID-IMMU625>3.0.CO;2-I (1998).
Sesma, L., Alvarez, I., Marcilla, M., Paradela, A. & Lopez de Castro, J. A. Species-specific differences in proteasomal processing and tapasin-mediated loading influence peptide presentation by HLA-B27 in murine cells. J Biol Chem 278, 46461–46472, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308816200 (2003).
Robinson, J. et al. The IPD and IMGT/HLA database: allele variant databases. Nucleic Acids Res 43, D423–D431, doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1161 (2015).
Sette, A. & Sidney, J. Nine major HLA class I supertypes account for the vast preponderance of HLA-A and -B polymorphism. Immunogenetics 50, 201–212 (1999).
Brusic, V. et al. A neural network model approach to the study of human TAP transporter. In Silico Biol 1, 109–121 (1999).
Sidney, J. et al. Definition of an HLA-A3-like supermotif demonstrates the overlapping peptide-binding repertoires of common HLA molecules. Hum Immunol 45, 79–93 (1996).
Voldby Larsen, M., Nielsen, M., Weinzierl, A. & Lund, O. TAP-Independent MHC Class I Presentation. Current Immunology Reviews 2, 233–245, doi: 10.2174/157339506778018550 (2006).
Pasquetto, V. et al. HLA-A*0201, HLA-A*1101 and HLA-B*0702 transgenic mice recognize numerous poxvirus determinants from a wide variety of viral gene products. J Immunol 175, 5504–5515 (2005).
Ohta, Y. & Flajnik, M. F. Coevolution of MHC genes (LMP/TAP/class Ia, NKT-class Ib, NKp30-B7H6): lessons from cold-blooded vertebrates. Immunol Rev 267, 6–15, doi: 10.1111/imr.12324 (2015).
Tang, J. et al. TAPI polymorphisms in several human ethnic groups: characteristics, evolution and genotyping strategies. Hum Immunol 62, 256–268 (2001).
Tang, J. et al. Genotyping TAP2 variants in North American Caucasians, Brazilians and Africans. Genes and immunity 2, 32–40, doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6363731 (2001).
Wei, M. L. & Cresswell, P. HLA-A2 molecules in an antigen-processing mutant cell contain signal sequence-derived peptides. Nature 356, 443–446, doi: 10.1038/356443a0 (1992).
Henderson, R. A. et al. HLA-A2.1-associated peptides from a mutant cell line: a second pathway of antigen presentation. Science 255, 1264–1266 (1992).
Chen, X. et al. An immunodominant HLA-A*1101-restricted CD8+ T-cell response targeting hepatitis B surface antigen in chronic hepatitis B patients. J Gen Virol 94, 2717–2723, doi: 10.1099/vir.0.052167-0 (2013).
Grant, E. et al. Nucleoprotein of influenza A virus is a major target of immunodominant CD8+ T-cell responses. Immunol Cell Biol 91, 184–194, doi: 10.1038/icb.2012.78 (2013).
Bertoletti, A. et al. Definition of a minimal optimal cytotoxic T-cell epitope within the hepatitis B virus nucleocapsid protein. J Virol 67, 2376–2380 (1993).
Missale, G. et al. HLA-A31- and HLA-Aw68-restricted cytotoxic T cell responses to a single hepatitis B virus nucleocapsid epitope during acute viral hepatitis. J Exp Med 177, 751–762 (1993).
Khakoo, S. I. et al. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses and CTL epitope escape mutation in HBsAg, anti-HBe positive individuals. Gut 47, 137–143 (2000).
Kefalakes, H. et al. Adaptation of the hepatitis B virus core protein to CD8(+) T-cell selection pressure. Hepatology 62, 47–56, doi: 10.1002/hep.27771 (2015).
Slingluff, C. L., Jr. The present and future of peptide vaccines for cancer: single or multiple, long or short, alone or in combination? Cancer J 17, 343–350, doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e318233e5b2 (2011).
Huang, L. R., Wu, H. L., Chen, P. J. & Chen, D. S. An immunocompetent mouse model for the tolerance of human chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 17862–17867, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608578103 (2006).
Apostolopoulos, V., Karanikas, V., Haurum, J. S. & McKenzie, I. F. Induction of HLA-A2-restricted CTLs to the mucin 1 human breast cancer antigen. J Immunol 159, 5211–5218 (1997).
Lai, C. L., Ratziu, V., Yuen, M. F. & Poynard, T. Viral hepatitis B. Lancet 362, 2089–2094, doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)15108-2 (2003).
Goldstein, S. T. et al. A mathematical model to estimate global hepatitis B disease burden and vaccination impact. Int J Epidemiol 34, 1329–1339, doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi206 (2005).
Liang, M. F. et al. Investigation of the distribution of different major HLA-A alleles in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Southern China regions. Chinese Hepatology 12, 240–243 (2007).
Menager, J. et al. Cross-presentation of synthetic long peptides by human dendritic cells: a process dependent on ERAD component p97/VCP but Not sec61 and/or Derlin-1. PLoS One 9, e89897, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089897 (2014).
Ma, W. et al. Long-Peptide Cross-Presentation by Human Dendritic Cells Occurs in Vacuoles by Peptide Exchange on Nascent MHC Class I Molecules. J Immunol 196, 1711–1720, doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501574 (2016).
Hwang, S. H. et al. Human leukocyte antigen alleles and haplotypes associated with chronicity of hepatitis B virus infection in Koreans. Arch Pathol Lab Med 131, 117–121, doi: 10.1043/1543-2165(2007)131[117:hlaaah]2.0.co;2 (2007).
Ramezani, A. et al. Association of human leukocyte antigen polymorphism with outcomes of hepatitis B virus infection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23, 1716–1721, doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05482.x (2008).
Chang, L. Y. et al. HLA-A33 is associated with susceptibility to enterovirus 71 infection. Pediatrics 122, 1271–1276, doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3735 (2008).
Tomazin, R. et al. Herpes simplex virus type 2 ICP47 inhibits human TAP but not mouse TAP. J Virol 72, 2560–2563 (1998).
Ackerman, A. L., Giodini, A. & Cresswell, P. A role for the endoplasmic reticulum protein retrotranslocation machinery during crosspresentation by dendritic cells. Immunity 25, 607–617, doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.08.017 (2006).
Matsui, M. et al. A CTL-based liposomal vaccine capable of inducing protection against heterosubtypic influenza viruses in HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 391, 1494–1499, doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.12.100 (2010).
Zhong, S., Malecek, K., Perez-Garcia, A. & Krogsgaard, M. Retroviral transduction of T-cell receptors in mouse T-cells. J Vis Exp, doi: 10.3791/2307 (2010).
We thank Dr. Todd N. Eagar for critical review of this manuscript, Dr. Pei-Jer Chen for kindly providing plasmid pAAV/HBV1.2, Dr. Songdong Meng for providing pcDNA3.1(+)/HBcAg and the NIH Tetramer Facility for preparation of the Biotinylated HLA-A*11:01-HBc141–151 monomers. We are grateful to Qi Zhang for assistance during the initial stages of this study. We extend our thanks to Jun Liu for helpful discussions. This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31300731) and the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2013ZX10004608002).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, M., Zhang, W., Guo, J. et al. Improved Transgenic Mouse Model for Studying HLA Class I Antigen Presentation. Sci Rep 6, 33612 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33612
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer (2021)
Frontiers in Immunology (2020)
Needle in a Haystack: The Naïve Repertoire as a Source of T Cell Receptors for Adoptive Therapy with Engineered T Cells
International Journal of Molecular Sciences (2020)
Advances in Molecular Pathology (2020)
Multifactorial heterogeneity of virus-specific T cells and association with the progression of human chronic hepatitis B infection
Science Immunology (2019)