Reduced Graphene Oxide Functionalized with Cobalt Ferrite Nanocomposites for Enhanced Efficient and Lightweight Electromagnetic Wave Absorption

In this paper, reduced graphene oxide functionalized with cobalt ferrite nanocomposites (CoFe@rGO) as a novel type of electromagnetic wave (EW) absorbing materials was successfully prepared by a three-step chemical method including hydrothermal synthesis, annealing process and mixing with paraffin. The effect of the sample thickness and the amount of paraffin on the EW absorption properties of the composites was studied, revealing that the absorption peaks shifted toward the low frequency regions with the increasing thickness while other conditions had little or no effect. It is found that the CoFe@rGO enhanced both dielectric losses and magnetic losses and had the best EW absorption properties and the wide wavelength coverage of the hole Ku-Band when adding only 5wt% composites to paraffin. Therefore, CoFe@rGO could be used as an efficient and lightweight EW absorber. Compared with the research into traditional absorbing materials, this figures of merit are typically of the same order of magnitude, but given the lightweight nature of the material and the high level of compatibility with mass production standards, making use of CoFe@rGO as an electromagnetic absorber material shows great potential for real product applications.


Results
includes SEM and TEM micrographs of the structure of the prepared Co x Fe 2-x O 3 and CoFe@rGO. Figure 1(a,b) shows that the prepared Co x Fe 2-x O 3 particles were short rod-like or rice-like shaped particles, densely packed together and exhibiting localized agglomeration. The rice-like particles were about 400 nm in length with a diameter of about 180 nm. Figure 1(c,d) shows the microstructure of CoFe@rGO, from which it can be seen that the crystal structure of the reduced graphene was in the shape of drape with transparent rough surface. Some drapes were stacked on the edge or surface. CoFe 2 O 4 particles were unevenly distributed in the graphene substrate, presenting pronounced localized agglomeration. The rice-like particles were about 400 nm in length with a diameter of about 200 nm. Figure 1(e,f) shows the TEM image of CoFe@rGO, from which it can be seen that the CoFe 2 O 4 are well-dispersed on RGO sheets. The high-resolution TEM image of the CoFe 2 O 4 particles exhibits a lattice spacing of 0.295 nm corresponding to the (311) planes. Figure 2(a) shows the Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS) analysis of the CoFe@rGO (the red square in Fig. 1(d)), which is proof of the presence of Co, Fe, O and C elementals in the composite. Raman spectrum analysis was carried out for the CoFe@rGO. The structure of the CoFe@rGO was characterized by excitation at a 514 nm wavelength on a Raman spectrometer. The results are shown in Fig. 2(b). The blue curve is the GO Raman spectrum, presenting the D-band at 1352 cm −1 and G-band at 1593 cm −1 , and 2D-band at 2670 cm −1 . For graphene, the D-band and G-band are the Raman characteristic bands. The D-band was due to the random arrangement of graphite or induced by lattice defects of C atoms. The higher the intensity of the D-band, the more the lattice defects in the crystals. The G-band is due to the stretching vibration of C atoms in the sp 2 -hybridized plane (degenerate regional center E 2g mode) while the 2D-band is due to the secondary Raman scattering of regional boundary phonon. The intensity ratio of D-band to G-band, I D /I G , could characterize the degree of crystal disorder. The intensity ratio of D-band to G-band (I D /I G ) for graphene oxide was 0.88. The red curve represents the Raman spectrum for the prepared CoFe@rGO. The D-band, G-band and 2D-band of the CoFe@rGO were at 1345 cm −1 , 1589 cm −1 , and 2704 cm −1 ; the corresponding intensities were 86.26, 100.49, and 11.14. The ratio of D-band to G-band (I D /I G ) was 0.86, slightly lower than that of the graphene oxide. This indicates that CoFe 2 O 4 eliminated defects during the preparation of CoFe@GO nanocomposites, which affected the Raman peaks of graphene. There were weak Raman peaks for CoFe 2 O 4 in the spectrum of CoFe@rGO at 520 cm −1 , and 533 cm −1 in the inset of Fig. 2(b). This may be explained as follows: when preparing the composites, during the mixing of cobalt ferrite and graphene oxide by mass ratio 1:1, the volume of graphene oxide was large, while the volume of cobalt ferrite was relatively small. Therefore, it is more difficult to only find a part with cobalt ferrite for Raman spectroscopy analysis. Hence, it is difficult to reflect the presence of CoFe 2 O 4 in the Raman spectrum. Figure 2(c) presents the X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the CoFe@rGO. Normally, the diffraction angle for graphene oxide is 10.4°, and the diffraction angle for the reduced graphene oxide is between 24° ~ 26°2 7 . As can be seen from Fig. 2(b), no diffraction peaks appeared at 2θ = 10°. At about 24°, it is measured a diffraction peak with a relatively wide full width at half maximum (FWHM) in the red XRD curve of CoFe@rGO. And it is also measured in the blue XRD curve of Co x Fe 2-x O 3 . This may be due to the overlap of the diffraction peak of the reduced graphene oxide and that of the ferric oxide, which indicates that during the heating process and annealing process of the facile hydrothermal synthesis, the ordered graphite crystal structure was reduced to some extent, that is, the graphene oxide was reduced into reduced graphene oxide. Moreover, apart from the reduced graphene oxide in the composites, we can detect the presence of CoFe 2  Characterization of CoFe@rGO. To clarify the microwave absorption properties, the reflection loss (RL) can be calculated according to transmission line theory and using the relative complex permittivity and permeability 30 : where, f is the frequency of electromagnetic waves, c is the velocity of electromagnetic waves in free space, and d is the thickness of the absorber, ε r is the permittivity and μ r is the permeability. An automatic vector network parameter sweep-frequency measurement system HP-8722ES was used. The electromagnetic parameters of the composite materials with filling amount of 5 wt%, 10 wt% and 15 wt%   (respectively, samples no. GF-5, GF-10, and GF-15) were measured by the coaxial reflection -transmission network method. The results are presented in Fig. 3. Figure 3(a) represents the complex permittivity of the GF-5, GF-10 and GF-15 samples, while Fig. 3(b) represents the complex permeability of the three composites. By comparing these curves, it is found that when decreasing the addition of CoFe@rGO from 15 wt% to 10 wt%, and further to 5 wt% to paraffin, both the real and the imaginary part of the complex permittivity were significantly reduced. With the increasing frequency of the EW, the real part of the complex permittivity of the sample GF-15 decreased from 29.91 to 6.03, while the imaginary part changed in the range of 8.52~45.17. For sample GF-5, the real part of the complex permittivity decreased from 10.51 to 4.29, while the imaginary part changed in the range of 2.66~7.76. Clearly, both the real part and the imaginary part of the complex permittivity decreased with the decreasing additive amount, indicating that the complex permittivity of the composite material can be controllable by varying the additive amount to paraffin, thereby influencing the absorption properties. The complex permeability of the three composites were barely changed with varying the amount of CoFe@rGO to paraffin. Both the real part and the imaginary part fluctuated to a limited extent. If the complex permittivity was too high, the complex permeability would be relatively low, leading to degradation of the impedance matching performance of the composites. Thereby, the EW absorption properties would be reduced.
The complex permittivity of GF-15 was too high, leading to poor matching with the complex permeability, such that the EW absorption properties had not been improved. For GF-5, its complex permeability was similar to that of GF-15, whereas the complex permittivity was obviously reduced, which is promising to improve the impedance matching characteristics of the composites. Therefore, the EW absorption properties of CoFe@rGO were enhanced.
According to the following equations: and using the eletromagnetic parameters of samples GF-5, GF-10 and GF-15, the dielectric loss tangent and the magnetic loss tangent were calculated. The relationship of the dielectric loss tangent vs. frequency and the magnetic loss tangent vs. frequency were plotted, as shown in Fig. 3(c,d). Figure 3(c,d) respectively show the dielectric and magnetic loss tangents of samples GF-5, GF-10 and GF-15. Figure 3(c) shows that when decreasing the addition of CoFe@rGO to paraffin, the dielectric loss tangent gradually decreased. With the increasing frequency of the EW, the dielectric loss tangent of GF-5, GF-10 and GF-15 fluctuated between 0.62 to 0.74, 1.10 to 1.21 and 1.41 to 1.51, respectively. It is concluded that the dielectric loss tangent decreased with increasing the additive amount to paraffin. Figure 3(d) shows that the magnetic loss tangent of GF-15 was the smallest. Compare with the EW absorption parameters of Fe 3 O 4 , the dielectric loss is increased and the magnetic loss is reduced with the inclusion of Co element into ferrite. In the frequency range of 2~14 GHz, with increasing the amount of CoFe@ rGO to paraffin, the magnetic loss tangent gradually increased. Compared with samples GF-5 and GF-10, the magnetic loss tangent of sample GF-15 was improved in the range of 2~18 GHz, exhibiting a higher magnetic loss. Therefore, the impedance matching characteristics of the composites could be improved by carefuly controlling the addition of CoFe@rGO to paraffin. Figure 4 presents the EW absorption properties of GF-5, GF-10, and GF-15 with different thicknesses calculated by transmission line theory. The specific EW absorption properties of GF-5 with different thicknesses are listed in Table 1. It can be seen that when the thickness was increased, the minimum peak of the reflection rate shifted to a low-frequency range. When the thickness was 2.3 mm, the corresponding frequency of the minimum peak of the reflection rate was 16.63 GHz. When the thickness increased to 3.3 mm, the corresponding frequency of the minimum reflection rate shifted to 10.86 GHz. The EW absorption property was the best when the sample thickness was 2.3 mm, in which, the reflection rate reached the lowest values of 16.63 GHz by − 25.66 dB. Due to the frequencies measured in the test being in the radar wave frequency range, it was not possible to obtain any bandwidth corresponding to RL less than − 10 dB. When the thickness was 2.7 mm, the bandwidth corresponding to RL less than − 10 dB reached 7.17 GHz from 10.87 to 18.04 GHz. In this case, the minimum peak of the reflection rate of GF-5 was − 21.64 dB, with good absorption property. Figure 4(b,c) show that for samples GF-10 and GF-15, with the increasing thickness, the minimum peak of the reflection rate shifted to the low-frequency range. However, the minimum reflection rates of the two samples were both above − 10 dB, demonstrating poor EW absorption property compared with sample GF-5.
The EW absorption properties of CoFe@Rgo (GF-5, GF-10, and GF-15) were tabulated in Table 2. From Table 2, the sample GF-5 had obviously better performance than the other two. That is to say, when the addition of CoFe@rGO to paraffin was reduced to 5 wt%, the EW absorber was improved. The EW absorption of GF-5 was optimal when the thickness was 2.3 mm; the corresponding minimum peak of the reflection rate was − 25.66 dB. When the thickness was 3.3 mm, the corresponding minimum peak of the reflection rate of GF-5 was − 21.64 dB. For GF-10, the best EW absorption property was achieved when the thickness was 1.9 mm, and the corresponding minimum peak of the reflection rate was − 10.10 dB. For GF-15, the best EW absorption property was achieved when the thickness was 1.6 mm, and the corresponding minimum peak of the reflection rate was − 6.99 dB. The minimum reflection rates RL of GF-10 and GF-15 were both above − 10 dB, presenting poor EW absorption property. Therefore, when the mass ratio of GO and CoFe 2 O 4 was 1:1, after annealing in the mixed gas of H 2 /Ar for 3 h, the prepared CoFe@rGO by adding 5 wt% composites into paraffin had the best EW absorption property.  According to the EW absorption properties of CoFe@rGO with different additive amounts, it is found that the complex permeability of GF-5, GF-10 and GF-15 were almost the same, whereas there were big differences in complex permittivity. GR-5 had the highest complex permittivity and showed the best EW absorption property, indicating that the additive amount of composites to paraffin could influence the dielectric loss significantly (shown in Fig. 5). However, it does not mean that the EW absorption property would become better with increasing the additive amount. The influence of impedance matching characteristics should be taken into consideration. Another thing that needs to be mentioned is that the dielectric loss tangent was far higher than the magnetic loss tangent. Therefore, the consumption of EW by composites mainly dependeds on the dielectric loss, which was essentially attributed to the polarization relaxation of rGO and the magnetic loss of the magnetic CoFe 2 O 4 particles. For sure, the contribution of CoFe 2 O 4 to the impedance matching of the composites and the EW absorption cannot be neglected. The microstructure of the composites also greatly promoted the absorption of the incident wave. In addition, other factors such as interface scattering and the polarization were as well beneficial to EW absorption. As a dielectric loss material, rGO was the main absorbent for enhancing the dielectric permittivity. The EW was absorbed by interacting with the electromagnetic field, while its degradation depended on the dielectric relaxation and interface polarization. When the EW entered into the composites, the directional movement of the carriers in the reduced graphene oxide formed a dispersion current, leading to dielectric relaxation and polarization at the interface. Thereby, the electromagnetic energy was consumed by being converted into heat. Meanwhile, the Fe in the composites acted as a dielectric material and could also absorb the EW by the polarization relaxation effect. By adding magnetic CoFe 2 O 4 particles into the rGO dielectric material, the composites were formed. On the one hand, the impedance matching of the composites was improved. The impedance difference between the composites and air was reduced, which was beneficial to letting more EW into the inside of the composites. On the other hand, the composites were magnetized, generating natural resonance etc. The composites had a dual nature of magnetic and dielectric loss, which was conducive to the EW absorption and to broaden the absorption bandwidth. The interface polarization in the composites could facilitate the electromagnetic wave absorption. rGO had the characteristics of large specific surface area, layered structure and so on. When mixing with CoFe 2 O 4 particles, a large number of interfaces were generated, like the interface between CoFe 2 O 4 particles and rGO. The scattering and the polarization at the interface could induce interaction between electromagnetic waves, thereby facilitating the EW absorption by the composites.  Fe2-xO3 and graphene oxide (GO). The literature showed that graphene oxide GO could turn into reduced graphene rGO by hydrothermal reaction 31 . The GO and CoxFe2-xO3 (mass ratio of 1:1) were uniformly dispersed in a solution of ethanol and glycerol (ratio of 3:1), followed by placing the mixed solution in the reactor for hydrothermal reaction at a furnace temperature of 180 °C for 12 h. After the reaction was completed, the reactor was cooled to room temperature in air. The solution was then centrifuged, and the precipitates were dried, giving brown CoxFe2-xO3/rGO nanocomposites; (iii) Preparation of CoFe@rGO. The prepared CoxFe2-xO3/rGO nanocomposites from step (ii) were annealed at 360 °C in mixed gas of H2/Ar = 8/92. Finally, CoxFe2-xO3/rGO nanocomposites were reduced into CoFe@rGO.
The different mixture proportions of the measured samples are illustrated in Table 3. GF-5, GF-10, and GF-15 were prepared with different contents of functionalized material to paraffin.
The samples were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) (FEI, Quanta 3D FEG), X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Rigaku DMAX-RB), and Raman spectroscopy (Jobin-Yvon, JY-HR800). The electromagnetic parameters of the samples were measured by a vector network analyzer system (HP722ES) from 2 to 18 GHz. Reflectivity loss values were calculated by Matlab software according to the complex permittivity and complex permeability. The CoFe@rGO prepared with the above process were mixed with paraffin to make a paste that could be shaped into coaxial samples. The electromagnetic parameters of the samples were tested by vector mesh analyzer to calculate the absorption properties. The sample had an inner diameter of 3.0 mm, an outer diameter of 7.0 mm, and a thickness of 2.0 mm. Three different sets of samples were prepared for comparative experiments, in which, the adding proportion of the composites were 5%, 10%, and 15%, respectively; while the amount of paraffin was 0.5 g for all three samples.  Table 3. Samples with different contents of functionalized material to paraffin.