Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Detailed Experimental Study of Ion Acceleration by Interaction of an Ultra-Short Intense Laser with an Underdense Plasma


Ion acceleration from intense (2 > 1018 Wcm−2μm2) laser-plasma interaction is experimentally studied within a wide range of He gas densities. Focusing an ultrashort pulse (duration  ion plasma period) on a newly designed submillimetric gas jet system, enabled us to inhibit total evacuation of electrons from the central propagation channel reducing the radial ion acceleration associated with ponderomotive Coulomb explosion, a mechanism predominant in the long pulse scenario. New ion acceleration mechanism have been unveiled in this regime leading to non-Maxwellian quasi monoenergetic features in the ion energy spectra. The emitted nonthermal ion bunches show a new scaling of the ion peak energy with plasma density. The scaling identified in this new regime differs from previously reported studies.


Ultrashort intense laser pulse, when focussed to extreme intensities, instantly ionises dense matter in the focal volume. Electrons and ions, with widely different inertia, respond and accelerate on different time scales during the interaction. The electrons can accelerate1 to relativistic energies leading to wide ranging effects including ultrafast2 as well as persistent3 magnetisation and emission of coherent XUV radiation4. Ions, being heavier, are accelerated as a result of the long timescale plasma dynamics involving the driving laser, the fast responding plasma electrons5 and the subsequent plasma electromagnetic and quasi-static field structures6,7 and thus constitute a very sensitive probe of the ensuing laser plasma process.

In the regime of a long pulse laser interaction with an underdense plasma (ne < nc, where ne and nc are the electron and critical density respectively), ion acceleration has already been in experimental demonstrated. The associated physical mechanisms have also been identified for the transverse (Coulomb explosion8,9, collisionless shock expansion10) and longitudinal (sheath acceleration11, Magnetic Vortex Acceleration12) ion accelerations. Though the connection between longitudinal and transverse ion accelerations have not been addressed in detail, it is well known that the large laser pulse duration plays a decisive role in affecting ion motion during the pulse and in determining the subsequent ion energy distribution8,9. In Coulomb explosions, ions are accelerated by the ponderomotive charge separation over the driving pulse duration, leading to a Maxwellian ion spectrum in the case of long plasma jet8. However, when conditions for collisionless shock expansion are met, higher ion energies with a plateau-like spectrum are observed10. In all known cases of acceleration, ion energy monotonically scales up with the plasma density.

In contrast in the ultrashort pulse domain, when laser duration (τ) attains a substantially shorter value than the inverse ion plasma frequency (τpi), the standard picture of ion acceleration depicting direct laser induced energy transfer within the ion response timescale becomes inadequate. Although this domain has been theoretically investigated13,14,15,16 and is of strong interest considering many ultrashort high repetition rate petawatt laser facilities coming online in the near future, there have been very few experimental studies17,18 and most importantly, the ion energy scaling with plasma density is unknown.

Here we present the first detailed experimental study of ultrashort laser-assisted ion acceleration from underdense He plasma in this new regime of interaction. We have performed experiments under conditions significantly different from previous studies where: (a) the laser duration is considerably shorter than the ion plasma period and (b) the interaction length (submillimetric gas jet length L) is comparable to the Rayleigh depth (zR) of the focussed laser beam in vacuum (zR/L ~ 1), reducing the multiple focusing within the plasma9. In a previous study18, we numerically tested the connection between longitudinal and transverse acceleration mechanisms with experimental evidences of ion acceleration occurring through a combination of sheath acceleration and Coulomb explosion of an ion filament formed around the laser axis. We now demonstrate that under these unexplored conditions, we observe ion acceleration that shows a new energy scaling with plasma density qualitatively different from previously reported scaling for the long pulse regime9,10. We also comment on the density dependent relative abundance of the two ion species detected in the interaction.

Experimental set up and detection technique

The experiments have been carried out using the Salle Jaune Ti:S laser19 at the Laboratoire d’Optique Appliquée (pulse duration τ = 35 fs, wavelength λμ = 0.8 μm linearly-polarized pulses). Each pulse carrying average energy of 800 mJ is aberration corrected using adaptive optics and is focussed to a spot size of dμ = 20 μm (1/e2) on target with an f/10 off-axis Au coated parabolic reflector, delivering a peak intensity of in vacuum. This leads to a dimensionless amplitude making the interaction with plasma electrons relativistic. The laser is focussed at the entry of a ~700 μm (FWHM) hypergaussian He gas jet. The supersonic jet has a sharp edged hypergaussian neutral density profile with the peak density depending on the height from the nozzle output surface20. The plateau neutral atomic density is varied within the range ~[0.03 − 3.1] × 1019 cm−3 by changing either the backing pressure or the opening time of the valve20. Under these conditions, and , with τpi = 2π/ωpi = 2π(miε0/niZ2e2)1/2, where ωpi, mi, ni and Ze are plasma frequency, mass, density and charge respectively for the ith ion species. This allows us to achieve condition (a) mentioned in the section above.

An overview of the experimental setup is presented in Fig. 1. Simultaneous transverse imaging in the vertical plane (top view: using Thomson scattered ω) and in the horizontal plane (side view: using 2ω light emitted from plasma channel) coupled with five axis motion of the gas jet system (Fig. 1) allow precise alignment and complete control of the nozzle position with respect to the laser focal volume. The accelerated ions are collected through a 100-μm pinhole (subtending 1.2 × 10−8 sr on the source) onto a Thomson parabola (TP) spectrometer (TP1) at 80° from laser propagation direction (Fig. 1), where quasi-monoenergetic ion bunches were obtained. The TP uses parallel electric and magnetic fields to disperse ions, depending on their charge-to-mass ratio and energy, finally tracing out parabolas on the detector plane as shown in Fig. 1. The tracks are detected with a 40-mm diameter phosphor coupled microchannel plate (MCP) and recorded on a 16-bit CCD camera. The pinhole image of 400 μm (nozzle exit diameter) in the gas jet plane occupies ~7.5 pixels on the camera, thus giving almost a point image of the ion source. The MCP gain is adjusted so that whole dynamic range of the CCD is used whilst keeping the best signal-to-noise ratio (~50:1). Another identical system of TP ion spectrometer (TP2) is used to detect ions accelerated in the laser propagation direction. Under our detection scheme TP1 and TP2 have energy detection thresholds ~48 KeV for He++ and ~10 KeV for He+. The energy resolution attainable with the TP-MCP assembly is ~2 KeV.

Figure 1: Experimental setup.
figure 1

The Thomson parabola (TP) and fields are parallel and aligned vertically upwards in the picture. A Thomson parabola ion spectrometer TP1 is placed at 80° from laser propagation direction (shown) with another identical one TP2 (not shown) is placed at 0° along the laser axis to look at ions accelerated in the forward direction. Top and side views imaging together locates the plasma channel position with respect to the gas nozzle.

Experimental observation

Focussing configuration

The laser power PL used in our experiments is larger than the threshold of relativistic self focussing21 given by the critical power, , where P0 = 17 GW and ωpe is electron plasma frequency. PL/Pc [0.5, 50] for the range of plasma densities accessed in the experiments, ensuring that the in situ intensity is higher than in the vacuum giving access to the relativistic interaction regime. Additionally, the gas jet size is of the order of Rayleigh length zR for our focusing conditions to avoid multiple focusing9 and thus satisfying condition (b) from the previous section.

In order to verify these points, we performed simulations using the WAKE code22 under conditions similar to the experimental configuration. A typical example is shown in Fig. 2. Figure 2(b,c) shows the simulation results when the laser dimensionless field amplitude is and interacts with the gas jet profile described in the previous section with plateau plasma electron density of ne = 0.02 nc (Fig. 2(a)). We observe in Fig. 2(b) that the vacuum laser peak intensity I0 is enhanced by a factor of 6 near 0.5 zR due to self focusing inside the plasma. Figure 2(c) shows that the self focusing leads to corresponding reduction in laser beam size inside plasma and that there is no subsequent refocusing9 of the beam.

Figure 2
figure 2

(ac) Results of WAKE simulations. (a) Schematic showing longitudinal position of the hypergaussian gas plasma density profile relative to the simulation box. (b) Ratio of vacuum peak intensity I0 and peak intensity inside plasma IM as a function of position z (zR = Rayleigh length). (c) Ratio of laser beam size at the entrance r0 and inside plasma r. (dg) Experimental measurements, showing variation in observed ion energy distributions of the two ionic species He+ and He++ as density is tuned from extremely underdense to mildly underdense regime. nc is critical density given by , where ωL, me and e are laser frequency, electron mass and electron charge respectively.

A simple analytical estimate of the higher field amplitude acquired by laser due to self-focusing can be made using stationary focusing condition23. This gives aSF = 2(PLne/πP0nc)1/3 while the self-focussed focal spot diameter is, . This analytical model slightly overestimates the absolute value of aSF whilst underestimates dSF when compared to the WAKE simulations values. The scaling of both aSF and dSF with plasma density ne qualitatively corroborates the WAKE simulations.

Energy distribution of accelerated ions

During the experiment, diagnostics TP1 and TP2 were simultaneously looking at ions accelerated in the transverse and the forward directions respectively as depicted in Fig. 1. Under our irradiation conditions and explored plasma densities. There was no detectable ion signal in TP2, i.e. no ions in the forward direction beyond the energy detection threshold was recorded. However, the TP1 ion traces show the existence of both He+ and He++ ion species for all experiemental conditions.

The observed spectra for energies below 50 KeV, where only He+ is accessible by the TP diagnostic due to its lower detection threshold for He+, show Maxwellian-like energy distribution18. In Fig. 2, we show typical He+ and He++ spectra between 50 KeV and 200 KeV recorded in the transverse direction for different values of density. Within this energy window and at lower plasma electron densities (Fig. 2(d,e)), the ion energy distribution shows striking features like quasi-monoenergetic peaks. These features gradually wash out and become less clear as plasma electron density is increased further (Fig. 2(f,g)).

Detailed realistic simulations using particle in cell Calder-Circ code24 for the exact experimental gas jet configuration and continued for sufficient time in order to track complete ion dynamics have previously allowed a qualitatively reproduction of the observed main ion spectral features and gain insight into the acceleration mechanisms18. No forward acceleration is observed in the simulation confirming experimental observation.

Figure 2 also captures the general relative tendencies shown by He+ and He++ energy distributions at different densities. We note that at very low densities (Fig. 2(d,e)) He++ population dominates He+ and this trend gradually reverses while increasing the density (Fig. 2(f,g)). This point will be addressed later.

Scaling of ion cut off energy with plasma electron density

Ion cut off energy EC is defined as the highest energy of the ion track for which ion counts above the average background noise could be observed on the MCP (Fig. 1). Figure 3 shows in detail the variation of EC with plasma electron density. We note that EC of both the accelerated ion species show similar behaviour with changing ne. However the cut off ion energy is not monotonically increasing with density as observed by Wei et al.10 in their case. In our experiment, we managed to reach an interaction regime beyond the ones previously reported and crossing an optimum of density for the acceleration. Thus we observe two clearly distinct regions of interest: a very low density region (ne ≤ 0.005 nc) where EC increases sharply with density (from few keV to well above 100 keV, as shown in the shaded region in Fig. 3) and a slowly varying region where EC appears to decreases slowly.

Figure 3: Cut off energy dependence on plasma electron density.
figure 3

The error bars represent standard deviation of the observed ion energy cut off obtained from different single shot ion energy spectrum collected under identical conditions. The inset replots the shaded region and shows power law fits to the variation.

The inset shows that ion cut off energy for both the species scales in a similar way with density within the shaded region (for He+, and for He++, ). These results differ significantly from the scaling of reported in reference10.

Preliminary simulations using a fully relativistic 3D PIC code, CALDER25, over short times (<1 ps) for comparable plasma density profiles at a few different density values indicate similar qualitative trend as observed in the experiments, i.e. an increase in EC followed by saturation with increasing ne. A more quantitative estimate for identifying the ion energy scaling would need much longer simulation times, sufficient enough for capturing the complete ion dynamics, and a scan over many density points with the realistic plasma density profiles. This is computationally very expensive and at present beyond scope but would be a topic of future investigations.

Relative population of detected He+ and He++ and effect of plasma electron density

Now we look at the relative abundances of the two accelerated ion species in our experiment. Firstly, Fig. 3 shows that both He+ and He++ have a very similar EC values. This observation suggests that He+ and He++ are not accelerated from the interaction volume by an electrostatic, and thus charge dependent, acceleration mechanism. The laser channel is devoid of He+ during the interaction. The in situ laser peak intensity, which is many orders of magnitude higher than the field ionization threshold (I ≥ 1016W/cm2) of He+, would completely ionise all helium gas throughout the interaction volume. With charge exchange effects, the observed He+ ions would most probably be accelerated He++ projectiles that captured electrons in elastic collision with background neutral He atoms rather than being accelerated by the fields in the plasma (one-electron-capture cross-section σe of the order of 10−16 cm−2 in the observed energy range26,27). This effect, as the laser-accelerated ions propagate out of the interaction region and reach the detector, strongly affects the measured spectral populations without significantly changing the ion energies. The phenomenon has been briefly suggested in refs 8,10 and now we will elaborate upon their arguements with further experimental evidences.

The evidence of charge exchange is clear in Fig. 4. (resp. ) represents the total He+ (resp. He++) counts per unit solid angle on the detector integrated over the energy range [50–180] keV, i.e. . Each point on the graph is an average over 5 to 10 shots under identical conditions. represents sum total of all the detected ions in this energy range per steradian. We identify and emphasize three distinctive regions in Fig. 4 (demarcated by the different shades): (I) the low density region upto 0.5% nc (white) where Nion, and monotonically increase with density (same density range as the gray region of Fig. 3); (II) the mid density region (light gray) where Nion increases, but the number of increases at the expense of and (III) the high density region (dark gray) spanning from ~1.7% nc to 3.2% nc, where the total number of ions reaching the detector decreases with density, indicating a less efficient acceleration and/or significant charge exchange and neutralization.

Figure 4: Variation of population of different accelerated ionic species with plasma electron density.
figure 4

The inset on the upper right corner shows the monotonic increase of relative population of detected He+ with respect to He++ with increase of density.

Region (I) corresponds in Fig. 2 to (d) and (e), where the abundance of He++ dominates over He+. Regions (II) and (III) correspond respectively to (f) and (g) in Fig. 2, where the abundance of He+ starts to dominate over the He++. We also note that in region (I), which coincides with the shaded region in Fig. 3, both the maximum accelerating field (EC) and total number ions in the accelerating volume (assuming cylindrically symmetric acceleration) are increasing with ne.

Finally, we can also plot , which represents the ratio of He+ to He++ counts (inset in Fig. 4), increasing almost monotonously with gas density throughout all the three identified gas density regimes and then seems to saturate. This observation is in good agreement with the fact that the increasing ambient gas density increases the probability of one-electron-capture by He++ ions and, at high densities, similarly affects the population of He+ ions.

Discussion of the Results and Perspective

The experimental results presented in the previous section show that this regime of ion acceleration can lead to several new observations: (i) quasi monoenergetic features in the ion energy distribution; (ii) predominant ion acceleration in the near transverse direction; (iii) power law scaling followed by saturation-like behaviour of EC with plasma density and (iv) evidence of conversion of accelerated He++ to He+ due to propagation through the gas density. Below we summarize parameters that play important role in ion acceleration process and then present a qualitative discussion of the above mentioned points.

Parameters affecting ion acceleration in the new regime

The most important parameters for a given gas density profile that affect ion acceleration process from underdense plasma by influencing the relevant sub-processes are summarized in Table 1. For illustrative purposes we contrast our experimental parameter space with that of a previous study10 for which ion energy scaling data is available as discussed previously.

Table 1 Important parameters (first column), in addition to gas density profile, that affect ion acceleration in underdense plasma and the major sub-processes controlled by them (second column).

In reference10: τpi/τ ~ 1, implying that ion dynamics within the pulse is important; implying they are mainly within the self modulated wake field acceleration (SMWF)28 electron acceleration regime; PL/Pc values in combination with τpi/τ imply a strongly relativistic regime where the long pulse would be self-focussed29 and evacuate the central channel of electrons and also undergo filamentation. Thus, as also clarified in their paper both in experimental observation and 2D PIC simulations, their parameter space lets them have near complete electron evacuation of their plasma channel by ponderomotive action of laser pulse leading to final coulomb explosion of the ion channel and ion acceleration (Maxwellian energy spectre) in their low density case; while in their high density case there is laser beam filamentation and subsequent shock acceleration of ions due to multiple filamentation interaction (Maxwellian spectre with plateau). So their maximum ion energy scaling is representative of their parameter space where Coulomb explosion of ion channel along with multiple filamentation assisted shocks govern ion acceleration process.

On the other hand we are in the totally different regime defined by: τpi/τ ([26.74, 245.2] for the total scan and [69.11, 245.2] for the scaling data) , implying that ion dynamics within the pulse is unimportant; range of λp ([4.5, 42] μm) includes  (~10.5 μm) implying we scan over different electron acceleration regimes from bubble or blowout through resonant linear wake field acceleration (LWFA) to self modulated wake field acceleration (SMWF)28; PL/Pc [0.5, 50] implying that we are in the moderately relativistic regime but we do not undergo complete evacuation of the plasma channel and neither we observe any filamentation of the laser beam. The other parameter laser focal diameter to plasma wavelength ratio dμ/λp has similar values in both in ref. 10 and in our case. All these allow us to perform the experiment where we are able to be in a regime where maximum energy ions are coming from not the Coulomb explosion of the plasma channel, but from the pinching of much smaller size central ion filament at the gas exit end which is formed in the first place due to electron acceleration dynamics. Thus this scaling is in a new regime of ion acceleration representative of ultrashort pulse domain.

Ion acceleration mechanism and directionality

The ion acceleration process under similar ultrashort laser conditions was previously studied in simulations in the ideal case of ultra-thin, infinitely sharp underdense H plasma box (~20λ × 20λ × 50λ)13. It was numerically possible to check ion response, although over very short time scales, and identify formation of a central ion filament inside the laser propagation channel under the blowout regime of electron acceleration. Subsequent expansion of this filament led to ion acceleration. These simulation conditions were too far from real experimental target conditions.

In order to explain the observed ion quasi monoenergetic features and their directionality we have carried out 3D PIC simulations in the case of our real full hyper-Gaussian He gas density profile and experimental focal spot configurations for much longer time scales up to 12 ps capturing full ion dynamics under our situation. We have been able to reproduce the non-Maxwellian ion energy features and explain the acceleration mechanism at ne = 0.016 nc18. Unfortunately the cost of simulations prohibited us to carry out a scan in density. It is revealed that in this regime of interaction, different ion populations (Maxwellian and non-Maxwellian peaks) are accelerated through different mechanisms prevalent in different regions of the gas jet. The ion energy distribution has three populations. The very low energy part of the spectrum (not shown) is dominated by the radial part of the wake field13,18,30. The low energy branch in the ion spectra is created by an electrostatic shock around the expanding central ion filament, as seen in ref. 13. The energies coming from the mechanisms in ref. 13 are compatible with those of the observed low energy branch.

The highest energy branch, on the other hand, comes from an ion filament in the down ramp of the gas jet. In the falling density ramp of the plasma, local tenuous electron population is unable to screen the ion charge and a radially focusing and longitudinally accelerating electric field is initiated for several ps18. As the longitudinal plasma density gradient is not sharp enough (unlike in ref. 13), the radial field overtakes the longitudinal one. Thus the ions are pushed towards the laser propagation axis by the quasi-electrostatic field in the sheath and form a high density filament at the exit end of the gas jet which finally Coulomb explodes. The superposition of the longitudinal target normal sheath acceleration (TNSA) like field and the radial field coming from Coulomb explosion of the filament results in ion acceleration with an exit angle between 50°–80° as detected in the experiment. This is the reason why no ions are observed in the forward direction in TP2 for these interaction conditions.

The TNSA like contribution in this regime can be enhanced by either sharpening the gas density gradient13,18 or by increasing the hot electron current density17 making forward ion acceleration feasible. For example, use of gas mixture (high Z and low Z gases) in ref. 17 resulted in higher electron beam charge through ionization induced trapping allowing forward ion acceleration. Here the longitudinal electric field results from the magnetic field generated by the high return current2,3 due to the high charge content of the electron beam. However in the forward direction for pure He gas, in conformity with our observation, they also do not observe any ions beyond noise level.

Variation of EC with plasma electron density ne

We now discuss the physics of the dependence of the maximum ion energy upon the plasma density as presented in Fig. 3. The measured cut off energy EC (Fig. 3), determined by the highest energy ions originating at the gas density down ramp as discussed above, thus depends on several factors: the formation of the central ion filament which depends on laser propagation across the plasma and subsequent electron acceleration; the strength of the sheath field which is related to the plasma gradient and the hot electron current; the sustenance of the sheath field in time31 which depends on the local azimuthal magnetic field dynamics2,3,13,18 and the efficiency of the self-pinching of the filament which depends on local electronic shielding13,18. Since we access a much wider range of plasma densities different electron acceleration mechanisms (Blowout, LWFA, SMWF etc.28) which control the hot electron current would play its role. The complete physics that quantitatively determines EC over such a wide range of plasma densities is complex and beyond the scope of this experimental work where we present a simple discussion instead.

The ion energy scaling (Fig. 3) as discussed before shows two distinct regions of interest: a density dependent sharp increase followed by a slowly varying part. To understand the scaling in Fig. 5 we plot dSF and plasma wavelength λp ~ 2πc/ωpe as a function of experimental plasma electron density ne. Figure 5 shows that the beam becomes more self focussed (the focussed beam diameter dSF continues to reduce) with increasing density increasing the in situ intensity in the interaction region. Thus increasing the plasma electron density in this range is similar to enhancing the laser pulse intensity while still being in the blowout regime which is efficient for generating the central ion filament13 which Coulomb explodes at the falling density ramp to determine EC. Thus higher density in this range leads to stronger Coulomb explosion of the ion filament and hence higher EC. This determines the density dependent rise of EC in Fig. 3. On the contrary in a regime where the pulse duration is larger than the inverse ion plasma frequency8,10, the fastest ions gain their radial momenta from Coulomb explosion, when the laser field is still present and bores a channel by expelling plasma electrons. They continue to drift undisturbed, due to their inertia, when the quasi-neutrality is restored when the electrons return, after the pulse is gone. Thus, in this regime, a denser plasma causes a stronger Coulomb explosion resulting in greater ion peak energies. This is different from the scaling obtained with a pulse duration shorter than the inverse ion plasma frequency.

Figure 5: Estimated variation of plasma wavelength λp (dashed curve) and self focussed diameter dSF (solid curve) with plasma electron density.
figure 5

For a given pulse intensity and plasma density the laser focal spot diameter dμ (dashed line) and longitudinal pulse length (solid line) sets the conditions of transverse wave breaking and bow wave generation. The inset shows that change in pulse depletion length ldep with respect to initial value as a function of electron density.

The slowly varying part of EC in Fig. 3 at comparatively higher plasma densities is modified under the combined effect of multiple processes: change in the nature of electron acceleration mechanism in this range of plasma densities28,32,33, laser propagation under the effect of pump depletion and ion charge neutralisation while traversing through neutral gas density27,34,35. The direct correlarion between electron acceleration and ion acceleration processes in this domain is a matter of further investigation. Laser propagation in this situation takes place in a density regime that satisfies the condition of bow wave generation23,36. When this condition is satisfied, bow wave is detached from the cavity generated by the laser field and this increase the electric potential of the wake wave36. The signature and strength of these effects is also encoded in the decrease in laser pulse energy depletion length, which under our experimental conditions is given by ldep ~ aSF(nc/ne)36. The inset in Fig. 5 shows that percentage change in pulse depletion length ldep with respect to initial value ldep,0 as a function of electron density. We note that ldep initially decreases rapidly with density and saturates around the density value (dashed line in inset) where the ion cut off energy also starts to saturate. The depleted laser energy goes into the plasma enhancing the wake potential and, under proper conditions, a component can also be converted into high harmonic radiations4,37. Another contribution to the slow decrease in the detected ion cut off would be that, a fraction of the accelerated energetic He ions would be neutralized because of large one27 and two34,35 electron capture crosssections at these energies that neutralizes the accelerated species before it reach the detector because they have to travel through denser neutral He gas. This possibly influences the diminishing trend in Fig. 4 for the total number of detected ions with plasma density. These could be identified by measuring the number of accelerated neutral atoms in such experiments38.

Conclusions and Outlook

In conclusion, the measurement of ion acceleration over a wide range of plasma densities allowed us to identify a new acceleration regime. This experiment performed under these unexplored conditions enabling the identification of a new scaling of ion cut off energy with plasma electron density. Both He ion species have been detected in agreement with previous reports but for the first time, we demonstrate charge exchange between the ion species over the inspected density range. Our results shed light on the density dependence of the maximum ion energy in such experiments with underdense plasma. The interaction is clearly categorized into three different density regimes. We have identified a region in which the accelerated ion cut off energy increases sharply at low density, then reaches an optimum at about 0.5% nc and finally decreases slowly. We have further provided a discussion of possible lines of theoretical and experimental work in this domain. Gas jet targets are debris free, easily customisable and reusable and make an attractive alternative test bed for ultra-short laser assisted ion acceleration schemes. Proper experimental optimisation of the longitudinal sheath field can be attained by tailoring the gas density gradient and/or through additional control of the gas density content e.g., utilising ionisation injection39 where for the same laser power, longitudinally accelerated electrons can reach higher energy enhancing the sheath field31,40. These possibilities open up the prospect of ion acceleration in this new intense ultra-short pulse domain motivated further by control of the cut off ion energy, ion populations and directions. In our view, this new evidences and subsequent discussions would motivate further experimental and theoretical investigations not only for fundamental laser plasma studies but also ion acceleration from gas jets at high repetition rate and in the ultrashort pulse domain.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Kahaly, S. et al. Detailed Experimental Study of Ion Acceleration by Interaction of an Ultra-Short Intense Laser with an Underdense Plasma. Sci. Rep. 6, 31647; doi: 10.1038/srep31647 (2016).


  1. 1

    Malka, V. et al. Principles and applications of compact laser-plasma accelerators. Nature Phys. 4, 447–453 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Buck, A. et al. Real-time observation of laser-driven electron acceleration. Nature Phys. 7, 543–548 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Flacco, A. et al. Persistence of magnetic field driven by relativistic electrons in a plasma. Nature Phys 11, 409–413 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Pirozhkov, A. S. et al. Soft-x-ray harmonic comb from relativistic electron spikes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 135004 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Vincenti, H., Monchocé, S., Kahaly, S., Martin, P. & Quéré, F. Optical properties of relativistic plasma mirrors. Nat. Commun. 5, 3403 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Sylla, F. et al. Short intense laser pulse collapse in near-critical plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 085001 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Sylla, F. et al. Anticorrelation between ion acceleration and nonlinear coherent structures from laser-underdense plasma interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 115003 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Krushelnick, K. et al. Multi-mev ion production from high-intensity laser interactions with underdense plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 737–740 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Sarkisov, G. S. et al. Self-focusing, channel formation, and high-energy ion generation in interaction of an intense short laser pulse with a he jet. Phys. Rev. E 59, 7042–7054 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Wei, M. S. et al. Ion acceleration by collisionless shocks in high-intensity-laserˇunderdense-plasma interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 155003 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Willingale, L. et al. Collimated multi-mev ion beams from high-intensity laser interactions with underdense plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 245002 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Kuznetsov, A., Esirkepov, T., Kamenets, F. & Bulanov, S. Efficiency of ion acceleration by a relativistically strong laser pulse in an underdense plasma. Plasma Physics Reports 27, 211–220 (2001).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Popov, K. I. et al. Ion response to relativistic electron bunches in the blowout regime of laser-plasma accelerators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 195002 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Hoshino, M. Wakefield acceleration by radiation pressure in relativistic shock waves. ApJ 672, 940 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Gorbunov, L. M., Mora, P. & Solodov, A. A. Dynamics of a plasma channel created by the wakefield of a short laser pulse. Phys. Plasmas 10, 1124 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Gorbunov, L. M., Mora, P. & Solodov, A. A. Plasma ions dynamics in the wake of a short laser pulse. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3332–3335 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Lemos, N. et al. Forward directed ion acceleration in a LWFA with ionization-induced injection. Journal of Plasma Physics 78, 327–331 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Lifschitz, A. et al. Ion acceleration in underdense plasmas by ultra-short laser pulses. New J. Phys. 16, 1367 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Flacco, A. et al. Comparative study of laser ion acceleration with different contrast enhancement techniques. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys . Res. Sect. A 620, 18–22 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Sylla, F., Veltcheva, M., Kahaly, S., Flacco, A. & Malka, V. Development and characterization of very dense submillimetric gas jets for laser-plasma interaction. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 033507 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Sun, G.-Z., Ott, E., Lee, Y. C. & Guzdar, P. Self-focusing of short intense pulses in plasmas. Phys. Fluids 30, 526–532 (1987).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Antonsen, T. M. & Mora, P. Self-focusing and raman scattering of laser pulses in tenuous plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2204–2207 (1992).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Bulanov, S. S. et al. Generation of gev protons from 1 pw laser interaction with near critical density targets. Phys. Plasmas 17, 043105 (2010).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Lifschitz, A. F. et al. Particle-in-Cell modelling of laser-plasma interaction using Fourier decomposition. Journal of Computational Physics 228, 1803–1814 (2009).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Coulaud, O., Dussère, M., Hénon, P., Lefebvre, E. & Roman, J. Optimization of a kinetic laser-plasma interaction code for large parallel systems. Parallel Computing 29, 1175–1190 (2003).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Janev, R. K. & Gallagher, J. W. Evaluated Theoretical Cross-Section Data for Charge Exchange of Multiply Charged Ions with Atoms. III. Nonhydrogenic Target Atoms. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 13, 1199 (1984).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Shah, M. B. & Gilbody, H. B. Single and double ionisation of helium by H +, He 2+ and Li 3+ ions. Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics 18, 899–913 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Esarey, E., Schroeder, C. B. & Leemans, W. P. Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accelerators. Reviews of Modern Physics 81, 1229–1285 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Faure, J. et al. Effects of pulse duration on self-focusing of ultra-short lasers in underdense plasmas. Physics of Plasmas 9, 756 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Andreev, N. E., Gorbunov, L. M., Kirsanov, V. I., Nakajima, K. & Ogata, A. Structure of the wake field in plasma channels. Phys. Plasmas 4, 1145–1153 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Willingale, L. et al. Willingale et al. reply:.Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 049504 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Faure, J. et al. A laserplasma accelerator producing monoenergetic electron beams. Nature 431, 541–544 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Mangles, S. P. D. et al. Monoenergetic beams of relativistic electrons from intense laserplasma interactions. Nature 431, 535–538 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    DuBois, R. D. Ionization and charge transfer in He 2+ rare-gas collisions. II. Physical Review A 36, 2585–2593 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Ghosh, S., Dhara, A., Mandal, C. R. & Purkait, M. Double-electron-capture cross sections from helium by fully stripped projectile ions in intermediate-to-high energies. Physical Review A 78, 042708 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Esirkepov, T. Z., Kato, Y. & Bulanov, S. V. Bow wave from ultraintense electromagnetic pulses in plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 265001 (2008).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Pirozhkov, A. S. et al. High order harmonics from relativistic electron spikes. New Journal of Physics 16, 093003 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Rajeev, R. et al. A compact laser-driven plasma accelerator for megaelectronvolt-energy neutral atoms. Nature Phys. 9, 185–190 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    McGuffey, C. et al. Ionization induced trapping in a laser wakefield accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 025004 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Willingale, L. et al. Longitudinal Ion Acceleration From High-Intensity Laser Interactions With Underdense Plasma. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 36, 1825–1832 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Bulanov, S. V., Pegoraro, F., Pukhov, A. M. & Sakharov, A. S. Transverse-wake wave breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4205–4208 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank K. Krushelnick, P. Mora and V. Tikhonchuk for fruitful discussions. The authors acknowledge the support of OSEO project n.I0901001W-SAPHIR, the support of the European Research Council through the PARIS ERC project (contract 226424), and the National research grant ANR-08-NT08-1-38025-1.

Author information




S.K., F.S., A.F. and M.V. performed the experiment. S.K. wrote the manuscript, carried out the data analysis and prepared all the figures (Figs 1–5). S.K. performed the WAKE simulations. A.L. performed some particle in cell simulation check. V.M. provided overall guidance. All authors participated in the discussion and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kahaly.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kahaly, S., Sylla, F., Lifschitz, A. et al. Detailed Experimental Study of Ion Acceleration by Interaction of an Ultra-Short Intense Laser with an Underdense Plasma. Sci Rep 6, 31647 (2016).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing