Article | Open | Published:

Label-free optical quantification of structural alterations in Alzheimer’s disease

Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 31034 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

We present a wide-field quantitative label-free imaging of mouse brain tissue slices with sub-micrometre resolution, employing holographic microscopy and an automated scanning platform. From the measured light field images, scattering coefficients and anisotropies are quantitatively retrieved by using the modified the scattering-phase theorem, which enables access to structural information about brain tissues. As a proof of principle, we demonstrate that these scattering parameters enable us to quantitatively address structural alteration in the brain tissues of mice with Alzheimer’s disease.

Introduction

Imaging brain tissues is an essential tool in neuroscience because understanding brain structure provides rich information about brain functions and alterations associated with diseases. Conventional imaging techniques include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET), but such techniques are limited by low spatial resolution (around 100 μm)1. To assess detailed structural information and to determine specific sites for assured diagnosis, histology has complemented MRI and PET. The traditional histological method provides the structural information about biological tissues to cellular scales, but relies on labour-intensive staining procedures and provides only qualitative information.

As a complementary method, label-free imaging techniques have been employed in brain imaging. For example, second harmonic generation was used for non-invasive brain imaging in cellular levels2. Raman scattering was also applied to image myelin fibres and amyloid plaques3 in brains. Optical coherence microscopy has also been utilised for label-free histology of a brain tissue4. However, they only provide limited qualitative information about tissue structures. Recently, quantitative phase imaging (QPI) techniques have been utilised for imaging pathological tissue slices5,6. From measured optical fields, mass density and spatial alterations in biological tissues could be quantified by retrieving refractive index (RI) distribution7,8,9. Because measured optical fields images of tissues with QPI techniques can provide information about scattering properties of tissue structures10,11, various studies have shown potentials of QPI techniques for label-free tissue imaging12 and capability of assessing and diagnosing breast and prostate cancers13,14.

Here, we present a quantitative label-free approach for the investigation of brain tissue structures. Employing QPI techniques equipped with a motorised stage, holographic images (amplitude and phase delay maps) of mouse brain tissue slices are measured with sub-micrometre resolution. This allows us to perform multi-scale imaging of a whole mouse brain tissue slice, which covers the sub-micrometre scale (subcellular organelles) to the millimetre scale (histological anatomy). We also present a modified version of the scattering-phase theorem11, in order to precisely retrieve scattering coefficients (μs) and anisotropies (g) maps of tissue slices from the measured holograms, which allows us to investigate the structural organisations of tissues quantitatively. As a proof of principle, we demonstrate that the scattering parameters of brain tissues of mice with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are significantly modified, suggesting that the present approach provides a unique means to investigate pathophysiology of neurological disorders.

Results

The schematic of the QPI setup is shown in Fig. 1a. To perform multi-scale QPI, diffraction phase microscopy (DPM) equipped with a motorised sample stage is utilised (see Methods). Employing common-path interferometry, DPM measures optical field images of transparent biological samples with high precision and stability15,16. To measure wide-field QPI images of a mouse brain slice, segmented QPI images are measured with the sub-micrometre resolution and digitally stitched to generate the wide-field image of the brain tissue slice.

Figure 1: Quantitative phase imaging of a mouse brain tissue slice.
Figure 1

(a) Diffraction phase microscopy equipped with a translational stage for measuring optical phase delays. (b) A representative hologram. (c) The retrieved amplitude and (d) phase image retrieved from the hologram in (b). (e) Wide-field phase images of the mouse brain slice, stitched from individual holograms (dotted boxes). Arrows indicate a recording order. (f–h) Phase delay image measured with DPM. (i–k) Bright-field image of an unstained brain tissue (l–n) H&E stained brain tissue slice micrograph of the same brain tissue. For each imaging modality, the magnified image of a selected region in the dashed square is represented below.

The reconstructed image of a representative brain tissue is presented in Fig. 1f–h. The total field of view is 8.9 × 6.6 mm (horizontal × vertical) and the lateral resolution is 0.8 μm, which is limited only by the numerical aperture (NA) of DPM in this study. The corresponding bright-field images are also presented (Fig. 1i–k). With high contrast and transverse resolution, the phase images quantify the RI of the tissue with respect to the mounting solution (RI = 1.355, see Methods) and show the general anatomical features in a brain and spatial variations at subcellular structure level, these being undistinguishable with bright-field imaging. The images of the adjacent slice stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) are also presented in Fig. 1l–n. A side-by-side comparison reveals the matching of general morphological features between the phase image and the conventional histology.

From the measured field images, the maps of μs and g are precisely retrieved. According to the light scattering theory, μsand g, which are thickness-independent parameters, quantify the attenuation of unscattered intensity per unit distance and the degree of forward scattering, respectively17. For a thin biological tissue, μsand g are related to the fluctuation of the scattered field, including both amplitude and phase delay. Recently, the scattering-phase theorem was introduced to retrieve μsand g from quantitative phase images11. To consider the alteration in amplitude in addition to the phase of the optical field that transmitted the tissue slices, we propose a modified version of the scattering-phase theorem that measures accurate values of μsand g, as shown in Fig. 2a,b (see Methods). The scattering parameters are ill-defined in a ventricular structure because the transmitted field is close to unity. In a sample region, however, the modified scattering-phase theorem precisely reflects the relation between spatial fluctuations of fields and scattering features. The accuracy of the proposed method is validated by measuring the scattering parameters of a known scattering phantom, indicating that phase object approximation underestimates both μsand g (see Supplementary Information). This implies that scattering parameters are sensitive to both amplitude and phase fluctuations due to light scattering, even in the cases of phase objects.

Figure 2: Scattering parameter maps of the brain tissue slice obtained from the quantitative phase image.
Figure 2

(a) Full-field maps of scattering coefficient and (b) anisotropy obtained from the quantitative phase images with the modified scattering-phase theorem. (c) Magnified images of scattering coefficient map and (d) anisotropy map. (e) A matched H&E stained image with (c,d). Boundaries between grey matter, white matter, and hippocampi are indicated with the dotted yellow lines. Boundaries of dentate gyri and cornu ammonis are presented with the cyan lines

The magnified view around hippocampi and dentate gyri is shown in Fig. 2c,d with the H&E stained micrograph of the adjacent tissue slice for comparison purpose (Fig. 2e).The maps of scattering parameters (μs and g) provide structural distinctions, thus serving as label-free biomarkers. The boundaries between the grey, the white matter, and the hippocampus formation are clearly separated. Other brain regions such as the thalamus and hypothalamus also exhibit distinct boundaries (the yellow dotted lines in Fig. 2c–e). Importantly, dentate gyri are clearly distinguished from the cornu ammonis (CA) due to their high values of μsand g (the cyan lines in Fig. 2c–e).

The distinct distribution of the values μsand g in the brain regions may relate to the different arrangements of cell types and subcellular compositions in the sub-regions of brains. The area with the highest values of μscorresponds to white matter. This is consistent with the fact that there are more lipid contents in white matter than in grey matter and hippocampi18. The lipid contents cause high local contrast of refractive index (RI), resulting in high values of μs. The dentate gyri exhibit higher scattering coefficients than the other regions in the hippocampi, primarily due to the presence of dense layers of neurons such as granule cells19.

Over the brain tissues, the retrieved map of g exhibits a value range between 0.9 to 1, which is comparable to other types of tissues17. Nevertheless, the distribution of g differs in various sub-regions; the larger size of scattering particles results in the increase of g. The map of g indicates higher values in the white matter, indicating the tendency of forward-directed light scattering. Together with the retrieved values of μs, this result indicates that the white matter consists of tissue components of inhomogeneous and large scattering particles, mostly bulky myelin sheaths. The areas of grey matter and hippocampi exhibit lower values of μs and g, implying that these areas are composed of tissue components of uniformly packed small scattering particles, mostly neuronal cells.

To demonstrate the applicability of the present approach, we have systematically compared the brain tissue slices of AD model mice with their wild-type littermates. The fluorescent images show that the amyloid plaques stained with Thioflavin-S were deposited only in the brain tissue of AD models (Fig. 3a). We utilised the maps of μsand g for addressing structural alterations in brain tissues associated with AD. Brain tissue slices of the same anatomical regions were measured in five mice from each group. Figure 3a,b show the representative maps for AD and wild-type mice, which show that both the values of μsand g generally increase throughout grey matter and hippocampi in the AD model.

Figure 3: Quantitative analysis of scattering parameters in brain tissues and their alterations in Alzheimer’s disease model mice.
Figure 3

(a) Full-field thioflavin-S stained fluorescence images and maps of scattering coefficient and anisotropy of representative AD and wild-type mouse. (b) Magnified images of scattering parameter maps in (a), showing clear distinction between grey matter, white matter, and hippocampi. (c) Distributions of scattering coefficients and anisotropy values in grey matter, white matter, and hippocampi regions for five mice from each model. Linear bar: distribution of scattering parameters in each different tissue. Rectangular bar: Sample-mean distribution of the scattering parameters in each sub-region. Range of the bar is mean ± standard deviation. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (d) Probability density maps of the scattering parameters in grey matter, white matter, and hippocampi for healthy and Alzheimer’s disease mice. (e) 50% density contour plots of the six scatterplots in (d).

For a quantitative analysis, we statistically analysed the distributions of μsand g in three distinct regions in the brain: grey, white matter, and hippocampi, as shown in Fig. 3c. (Numerical values are shown in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). A comparison of sample-mean distribution indicates significant increases of μsand g in the grey and hippocampal regions of the AD models, suggesting that AD pathology alters tissues in these areas to exhibit higher RI inhomogeneity and increased size of scattering particles. These results are consistent with the fact that AD is characterised by the accumulation of extracellular amyloid and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles with larger size than granule cells20, as well as neuronal cell losses throughout grey matter and hippocampi21. The structural changes by AD pathology are mostly distributed over the grey matter and hippocampi, while white matter is relatively spared.

To further investigate the structural alterations in the brain tissues associated with AD, correlative analysis about scattering parameters was performed (Fig. 3d). Figure 3d separately shows the scatterplots of μsand g for the grey matter, white matter and hippocampi in each group. While the scatterplots exhibit a similar correlation of μsand g in white matters for the AD and wild-type mice, they showed a significant difference in the grey matter and hippocampi between the AD and wild-type mice. These trends are clearly visualised when the 50% density boundaries of the scatterplots of μsand g were simultaneously displayed for the six different populations (Fig. 3e).

Discussion

We present the wide-field label-free QPI of mouse brain tissue slices. We demonstrate the multi-scale phase images of the brain tissues with an image-stitching scheme and the accurate retrieval of the scattering parameters with the modified scattering-phase theorem. Recently, several techniques have been developed to convert existing optical microscopes into QPI instruments22,23,24, which may allow the present method easily accessible to histological laboratories. With AD model mice, we suggest that this approach can be used to systematically quantify the structural changes of AD pathology by measuring quantitative phase images of brain tissue slices. The retrieval of scattering parameters eliminates staining procedures and also provides the quantitative information of the morphology that H&E histology cannot.

The present approach is different from previous reports which utilise the distribution of RI values in tissues7,8. First, the retrieved scattering parameters in this study are independent of the thicknesses of tissue slides. In order to measure the RI values of tissues, one should assume the axial homogeneity of RI in a tissue or need to use a complicated tomographic instrument5,25. The present method utilises the measured 2-D quantitative phase images to retrieve scattering parameters, which can avoid these technical difficulties and enables to easily access pathologically relevant information. Second, the present approach enables the spatially resolved information. Therefore, the retrieved optical scattering parameters can be readily compared and complimented to the existing histological methods in order to address anatomical information of tissue slices.

Possible errors in our experiments can be resulted by remaining field-dependent aberrations, speckle noises or the deformation of biological tissues during paraffin embedding process26. This can be resolved if we improve the image reconstruction algorithm, employ incoherent light source for low-coherence interferometry9,22, or compensate for the deformation errors27. Nevertheless, we found that the modified scattering-phase theorem and the current experimental implementation provide scattering parameters of brain tissues, in good agreement with previously reported results28.

Although this work has focused on brain tissue slices, the approach is sufficiently broad and general, and it will directly offer novel approaches for general histopathology. The present method has potentials to be applied to investigate prognosis of various neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease. In order to further extend the present method, hyperspectral29,30,31 or polarization-sensitive32,33 QPI techniques can also be exploited. Recently, several quantitative phase microscopes have been commercially available34,35, which make this approach readily available to many researchers. We anticipate that extension of this work will directly offer novel approaches for comprehensive histopathology.

Materials and Methods

Optical setup of diffraction phase microscopy

In order to obtain the optical field images of brain tissue slices, DPM has been employed. DPM is a common-path interferometric microscopy, capable of quantitative phase imaging of biological samples with high resolution and phase stability15. As an illumination source, a diode-pumped solid-state laser (λ = 520 nm, LP520-SF15, Thorlabs Inc., USA) is employed. An inverted microscope (IX71, Olympus American Inc., USA) is equipped with a motorised xy-scanning stage (MLS203, Thorlabs Inc., USA) and a 10× objective lens (0.4 NA, UPlanSApo 10×, Olympus American Inc., USA). Via the objective and a tube lens, the optical field of a sample is imaged onto the image plane. To acquire a hologram, a grating (92 grooves/mm, 46-071, Edmund Optics Inc., USA) is placed at the sample plane, and a customised pinhole filter is located on the Fourier plane. The diffraction grating splits the sample field into many diffraction orders. Among them, only two orders (the 0th and the 1st diffraction order) of the diffracted beams are further projected onto a CCD plane via a 4-f telescopic imaging system. The 1st diffraction beam is spatially filtered using the pinhole (25 μm diameter) located at the Fourier plane, which serves as a reference beam.

Both the sample and the reference beams interfere at the CCD plane, generating a spatially modulated hologram (Fig. 1b). A total magnification of the imaging system is 71×. Individual holograms were recorded by a sCMOS camera (C11440-22C, Hamamatsu Inc., Japan). Using a field retrieval algorithm36, the amplitude and the phase delay maps of a sample are retrieved (Fig. 1c,d). The amplitude image (Fig. 1c) does not exhibit enough contrast to distinguish geometric anatomy and cellular components due to the optical transparency of tissues. The phase image of the tissue (Fig. 1d), however, clearly shows the meso-scale and the sub-micrometre scale structures of the tissue with significant phase imaging contrast. The resolution of the imaging system is 0.8 μm, which is limited by the numerical aperture of the objective lens (NA = 0.4).

Stitching segmented quantitative phase images

The full-field phase image of a mouse brain tissue is reconstructed from the measured segmented phase images by stitching the segmented images. In order to achieve wide-field QPI, the motorised stage laterally translates a tissue slice in a fully automated manner. The field of view of a single mosaic image is 187 × 187 μm, which overlaps 10% with adjacent images. A custom-made MATLAB code was used to reconstruct a full-field phase image from more than 1000 mosaics, i.e. 1908 mosaics for Fig. 1f (53 × 36).

The reconstruction includes several imaging processes in order to correctly stitch individual segmented phase images. First, the static phase distortion due to the aberration of the imaging system is removed by subtracting mosaic images by the background phase image. Remaining phase error was reduced by matching the overlapped adjacent areas between mosaic images. A constant phase value is added to the reconstructed image so that the background area has the phase value of zero. Both amplitude and phase images are corrected similarly.

Sample preparation

For the preparation of brain tissue slices, we used 22-month-old male AβPPSWE/PS1ΔE9 transgenic mice (Tg) as AD models and their wild-type (Wt) littermates as control models. The mice were deeply anaesthetised by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine/xylazine and perfused transcardially with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The brains were postfixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C overnight, and dehydrated through a series of increasing gradient of ethanol using automatic tissue processor (TP1020, Leica). The dehydrated brain tissues were embedded in paraffin block and sliced into 3–3.5 μm-thick coronal sections using microtome (RM2245, Leica Microsystems, Germany). <>r After deparaffinization using xylene and rehydration in a decreasing gradient of ethanol, Thioflavin-S and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains were used to observe deposition of amyloid plaques and anatomical structures. The tissue sections were mounted with Histomount (National Diagnostics Inc., USA) and cover-slipped. The sample preparation procedures and the methods were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (KA-2015-03). All the experiments in this study were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Derivation of modified scattering-phase theorem for accurate retrieval of μ s and g

The scattering-phase theorem is a recently proposed method which retrieves maps of μs and g from a spatial fluctuation of RI11. However, this method computes the values of μsand g by assuming uniform amplitude distribution of a sample. In order to improve the accuracy of the retrieved scattering parameters, we modified the original scattering-phase theorem to consider amplitude fluctuation as well as phase fluctuation in a sample. The detailed algorithm of the modified scattering-phase theorem is explained below.

By Beer-Lambert law, μs is accurately retrieved as,

where is the thickness of a tissue, the unscattered light intensity, and the total illumination intensity, which is the sum of scattered intensity and unscattered intensity. Here, I and I0 are retrieved by Fourier Transform Light Scattering (FTLS) technique37,38. FTLS is a numerical method to obtain the angular light scattering map in the far-field by numerically propagating the measured 2-D optical field of a sample at the sample plane, U(r) = A(r)exp[(r)], where A(r) and ϕ(r) are the amplitude and the phase of the field. Then, the 2D angular light intensity in the far-field has the following relation,

where q is the spatial frequency vector. By setting q = 0, I is calculated, and then μscan be directly computed from Eq. (1). Unlike the original scattering-phase theorem, both amplitude and phase are considered in calculating μs, without setting A(r) = 1.

Anisotropy coefficient g is defined as the average cosine of the scattered angle after a single scattering process as,

where p(cos θ) is the intensity distribution of the angular scattering plot. Since the scattering angle is related with the spatial frequency (|q| = 2k0sin θ), Eq. (3) can be rewritten as follows:

Applying Parseval’s theorem followed by differentiation theorem, the following relationship is obtained:

According to the definition, anisotropy should be computed where the thickness of a tissue is equivalent to the mean free path (ls = 1/μs). Therefore, we numerically propagate the field through N = ls/L layers. Here, we compute μs from the method in the previous section. The result of the numerical propagation of Eq. (5) is as follows:

where Als(r) = A(r)N and <>r denotes spatial averaging over the sub-region window. For the results analysed in this work, the sub-region window was set to be 18 μm × 18 μm, which is large enough to represent local structural variations and small enough to correspond to cellular sizes.

In the original version of the scattering-phase theorem11, the uniform amplitude assumption yields the following result:

However, in our modified scattering-phase theorem, the Eq. (6) is directly used for the accurate calculation of the anisotropy.

Statistical Analysis

We utilised MATLAB in order to calculate P values by Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank tests for comparing the sample means of scattering coefficients and anisotropy values between normal and AD models. All of the numbers following the ± sign in the text are standard deviations.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Lee, M. et al. Label-free optical quantification of structural alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Rep. 6, 31034; doi: 10.1038/srep31034 (2016).

References

  1. 1.

    , , , & Resolution enhancement in MRI. Magn. Reson. Imaging 24, 133–154 (2006).

  2. 2.

    et al. Live tissue intrinsic emission microscopy using multiphoton-excited native fluorescence and second harmonic generation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7075–7080 (2003).

  3. 3.

    , , , & Ex vivo and in vivo imaging of myelin fibers in mouse brain by coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Opt. Express. 16, 19396–19409 (2008).

  4. 4.

    et al. Wide-field optical coherence microscopy of the mouse brain slice. Opt. Lett. 40, 4420–4423 (2015).

  5. 5.

    et al. Quantitative phase imaging techniques for the study of cell pathophysiology: from principles to applications. Sensors 13, 4170–4191 (2013).

  6. 6.

    Quantitative Phase Imaging of Cells and Tissues. (McGraw-Hill Professional, 2011).

  7. 7.

    et al. Tissue refractometry using Hilbert phase microscopy. Opt. Lett. 32, 3522–3524 (2007).

  8. 8.

    et al. Digital holographic microscopy quantifies the degree of inflammation in experimental colitis. Integr. Biol. 5, 624–630 (2013).

  9. 9.

    , , & Tissue refractive index as marker of disease. J. Biomed. Opt. 16 (2011).

  10. 10.

    et al. Measuring the scattering parameters of tissues from quantitative phase imaging of thin slices. Opt. Lett. 36, 2281–2283 (2011).

  11. 11.

    , & Scattering-phase theorem. Opt. Lett. 36, 1215–1217 (2011).

  12. 12.

    et al. Wide-field computational imaging of pathology slides using lens-free on-chip microscopy. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 267ra175 (2014).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Prediction of prostate cancer recurrence using quantitative phase imaging. Sci. Rep. 5, 10.1038/srep09976 (2015).

  14. 14.

    et al. Breast cancer diagnosis using spatial light interference microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 20, 111210–111210 (2015).

  15. 15.

    , , & Diffraction phase microscopy for quantifying cell structure and dynamics. Opt. Lett. 31, 775–777 (2006).

  16. 16.

    , , , & Diffraction phase and fluorescence microscopy. Opt. Express 14, 8263–8268 (2006).

  17. 17.

    & Tissue optics: light scattering methods and instruments for medical diagnosis. Vol. 13 (SPIE press Bellingham, 2007).

  18. 18.

    & Lipid composition of the normal human brain: gray matter, white matter, and myelin. J. Lipid Res. 6, 537–544 (1965).

  19. 19.

    & Mitotic Neuroblasts in the 9-Day-Old and 11-Month-Old Rodent Hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 4, 1429–1441 (1984).

  20. 20.

    et al. Quantitative-Analysis of Senile Plaques in Alzheimer-Disease - Observation of Log-Normal Size Distribution and Molecular Epidemiology of Differences Associated with Apolipoprotein-E Genotype and Trisomy-21 (down-Syndrome). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3586–3590 (1995).

  21. 21.

    & Alzheimers-Disease - Striatal Amyloid Deposits and Neurofibrillary Changes. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 49, 215–224 (1990).

  22. 22.

    et al. Spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM). Opt. Express. 19, 1016–1026 (2011).

  23. 23.

    & Compact and portable low-coherence interferometer with off-axis geometry for quantitative phase microscopy and nanoscopy. Opt. Express 21, 5701–5714 (2013).

  24. 24.

    & Quantitative phase imaging unit. Opt. Lett. 39, 3630–3633 (2014).

  25. 25.

    et al. Optical diffraction tomography techniques for the study of cell pathophysiology. Available at: (Accessed: 2nd Mar 2016) (2016).

  26. 26.

    et al. Investigation of influences of the paraformaldehyde fixation and paraffin embedding removal process on refractive indices and scattering properties of epithelial cells. J. Biomed. Opt. 19 (2014).

  27. 27.

    et al. Precancerous esophageal epithelia are associated with significantly increased scattering coefficients. Biomed. Opt. Express 6, 3795–3805 (2015).

  28. 28.

    , , & Optical properties of tissues quantified by Fourier-transform light scattering. Opt. Lett. 34, 1372–1374 (2009).

  29. 29.

    & Spectro-angular light scattering measurements of individual microscopic objects. Opt. Express. 22, 4108–4114 (2014).

  30. 30.

    , & Spectro-refractometry of Individual Microscopic Objects Using Swept-Source Quantitative Phase Imaging. Anal. Chem. 85, 10519–10525 (2013).

  31. 31.

    , & Nonlinear phase dispersion spectroscopy. Opt. Lett. 36, 4665–4667 (2011).

  32. 32.

    , , , & Polarization holographic microscopy for extracting spatio-temporally resolved Jones matrix. Opt. Express. 20, 9948–9955 (2012).

  33. 33.

    , , & Jones phase microscopy of transparent and anisotropic samples. Opt. Lett. 33, 1270–1272 (2008).

  34. 34.

    , & Active illumination using a digital micromirror device for quantitative phase imaging. Opt. Lett. 40, 5407–5410 (2015).

  35. 35.

    et al. Optical diffraction tomography using a digital micromirror device for stable measurements of 4D refractive index tomography of cells, Proc. SPIE 9718, Quantitative Phase Imaging II, 971814. 10.1117/12.2216769 (March 9, 2016).

  36. 36.

    & Real-time quantitative phase imaging with a spatial phase-shifting algorithm. Optics letters 36, 4677–4679 (2011).

  37. 37.

    , , , & Fourier Transform Light Scattering of Inhomogeneous and Dynamic Structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008).

  38. 38.

    et al. Fourier Transform Light Scattering (FTLS) of Cells and Tissues. J. Comput. Theor. Nanos. 7, 2501–2511 (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by KAIST, and the National Research Foundation of Korea (2015R1A3A2066550, 2014K1A3A1A09063027, 2012-M3C1A1-048860, 2014M3C1A3052537) and Innopolis foundation (A2015DD126).

Author information

Author notes

    • Moosung Lee
    •  & Eeksung Lee

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    • Eeksung Lee

    Present address: Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13620, Republic of Korea.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, 34141 South Korea

    • Moosung Lee
    • , JaeHwang Jung
    • , Hyeonseung Yu
    • , Kyoohyun Kim
    • , Jonghee Yoon
    •  & YongKeun Park
  2. KI for Health Science and Technology, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea

    • Moosung Lee
    • , Eeksung Lee
    • , JaeHwang Jung
    • , Hyeonseung Yu
    • , Kyoohyun Kim
    • , Jonghee Yoon
    • , Shinhwa Lee
    • , Yong Jeong
    •  & YongKeun Park
  3. Graduate School of Medical Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, South Korea

    • Eeksung Lee
  4. Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, South Korea

    • Eeksung Lee
    •  & Yong Jeong
  5. Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, South Korea

    • Shinhwa Lee
  6. TOMOCUBE, Inc., Daejeon 34051, Republic of Korea

    • YongKeun Park

Authors

  1. Search for Moosung Lee in:

  2. Search for Eeksung Lee in:

  3. Search for JaeHwang Jung in:

  4. Search for Hyeonseung Yu in:

  5. Search for Kyoohyun Kim in:

  6. Search for Jonghee Yoon in:

  7. Search for Shinhwa Lee in:

  8. Search for Yong Jeong in:

  9. Search for YongKeun Park in:

Contributions

Y.K.P. and Y.J. initiated the work and supervised the project. M.L. developed the method. M.L., E.L., J.H.J., H.Y., K.K., J.Y. and S.L. performed experiments. All the authors wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yong Jeong or YongKeun Park.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31034

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.