Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Catalytic Hydrodeoxygenation of Bio-oil Model Compounds over Pt/HY Catalyst

Abstract

The hydrodeoxygenation of a model compound of lignin-derived bio-oil, guaiacol, which can be obtained from the pyrolysis of biomass to bio-oil, has attracted considerable research attention because of its huge potential as a substitute for conventional fuels. In this study, platinum-loaded HY zeolites (Pt/HY) with different Si/Al molar ratios were used as catalysts for the hydrodeoxygenation of guaiacol, anisole, veratrole, and phenol to a range of hydrocarbons, such as cyclohexane. The cyclohexane (major product) yield increased with increasing number of acid sites. To produce bio-oil with the maximum level of cyclohexane and alkylated cyclohexanes, which would be suitable as a substitute for conventional transportation fuels, the Si/Al molar ratio should be optimized to balance the Pt particle-induced hydrogenation with acid site-induced methyl group transfer. The fuel properties of real bio-oil derived from the fast pyrolysis of cork oak was improved using the Pt/HY catalyst.

Introduction

Bio-oil obtained by the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass contains a range of chemicals, such as acids (e.g. acetic acid), anhydrosugars (e.g. levoglucosan), furanics (e.g. furan, furfural), phenolics (e.g. guaiacol), aldehydes, and ketones1,2,3,4,5,6. These bio-based chemicals and bio-based fuels are potential alternatives to petroleum-based chemicals and fuels. In particular, a high bio-oil yield from biomass can be achieved using a fast-pyrolysis technique. Bio-oil has potential use as a fuel, such as gasoline, diesel or jet fuel, but it needs to be up-graded by removing oxygen before it can find widespread use. Among the many oxygen removal techniques, a catalytic process is believed to be most efficient. The catalytic processes for oxygen removal can be classified into two areas, atmospheric catalytic fast pyrolysis and high pressure hydrodeoxygenation (HDO). Catalytic fast pyrolysis uses a series of microporous zeolites (HZSM-5, HY, HBeta, etc.) and mesoporous materials (Al-SBA-15, Al-MCM-48, Al-MCM-41, etc.) in the absence of hydrogen. Although high pressure HDO consumes considerable amounts of hydrogen during the reactions, its ability to remove oxygen from bio-oil by HDO is much better than that by atmospheric catalytic fast pyrolysis. Furthermore, in the HDO process, high pressure hydrogenation can prevent coke deposition on the catalyst surface, which would be beneficial for the reactor operation7,8. HDO has attracted considerable attention because the product quality is even better than conventional transportation fuel7,8.

Among the various components of bio-oil, a series of phenolic compounds originating from lignin comprises 20 ~ 30 wt.% of the organic products9. In the bio-oil produced from the fast-pyrolysis of lignin, the proportion of guaiacol and its derivatives is approximately 39%. Among the various compounds, guaiacol is considered a representative model compound for bio-oil originating from lignin because it has two types of C-O bonds (Csp2OH and Csp2OCH3) in its molecular structure8. Therefore, many studies have used guaiacol as a model compound and examined the HDO of guaiacol using a range of catalysts, such as sulfided NiMo/Al2O3 and CoMo/Al2O3, which are well-known catalysts for hydrodesulphurization, precious metal catalysts (platinum, ruthenium, rhodium, etc.), and nickel (Ni) catalyst. Precious metal catalysts exhibit higher catalytic activities than sulfided NiMo/Al2O3 and CoMo/Al2O310.

In addition to these catalytically-active metallic components, the catalyst support also plays an important role. In particular, acidic supports have been reported to enhance the catalytic activity for deoxygenation in the HDO reaction8,11. Therefore, a bifunctional catalyst that combines the hydrogenation ability of a metal with the deoxygenation ability of acid sites, has attracted considerable attention for HDO. Hong et al. suggested that a bi-functional catalyst, Pt/HY, is a suitable catalyst for the HDO of phenol9. Zhu et al. used Pt/HBeta as a catalyst for the HDO of anisole12. They reported that platinum and acid sites had a synergistic effect for HDO. Lee et al. reported that an acidic support, SiO2-Al2O3, enhanced the production of cyclohexane when Rh/SiO2-Al2O3 was used as a catalyst11. Nimmanwudipong et al. used Pt/Al2O3 as a catalyst for the hydroconversion of guaiacol, and reported that this bi-functional catalyst enhances HDO13.

Although many studies have reported the advantages of bifunctional catalysts, there is a paucity of reports on the bi-functional catalyst Pt/HY for the HDO of guaiacol. In this study, a series of Pt/HY catalysts with different silicon to aluminum (Si/Al) molar ratios were used for the HDO of guaiacol. The reaction mechanism for the HDO of guaiacol was examined by performing the HDO of the main reaction intermediates of guaiacol HDO, i.e., veratole, phenol and anisole. In addition to the model compound reactions, HDO of the actual bio-oil obtained from the pyrolysis of cork oak was also carried out to evaluate the feasibility of Pt/HY for practical applications.

Results and Discussion

Characterization of the catalysts

Table S1 lists the physical properties of the catalysts used in this experiment. In the case of using HY as a support, the surface area and pore volume of the Pt/HY catalysts [Pt/HY(2.6), Pt/HY(40), Pt/HY(100)] increased with increasing Si/Al molar ratio of the HY support. The BET surface areas of Pt/HY(2.6), Pt/HY(40) and Pt/HY(100) were 527, 657, and 697 m2/g, respectively, and the corresponding pore volumes were 0.33, 0.47, and 0.50 cm3/g. When HZSM-5 was used as a support, the BET surface area (335 m2/g) and pore volume (0.29 cm3/g) of Pt/HZSM-5 were the lowest among the catalysts used in this study.

Figure S1 presents the NH3-TPD spectra of Pt/HY with different Si/Al molar ratios and Pt/HZSM-5. For the series of Pt/HY catalysts with different Si/Al molar ratios, a single major peak appeared. Considering that the peak areas in the TPD spectra are related to the total amount of ammonia desorbed from the acid sites, the total number of acid sites decreased with increasing Si/Al molar ratio. In the case of using HY(2.6) as a support, a distinct peak appeared at 180 °C together with a weak broad peak at approximately 300 °C, indicating the presence of both weak and strong acid sites. This means that an increase in the amount of aluminum incorporated in Y zeolite resulted in an increased number of Brönsted and Lewis acid sites. In contrast to the Pt/HY catalysts, Pt/HZSM-5 showed two distinct peaks, a low-temperature peak around 180 °C and a high-temperature peak at approximately 340 °C, which is higher than that of Pt/HY and was more distinct. This indicates that the acid strength of Pt/HZMS-5 can be stronger that of Pt/HY. The acid amount decreased in the order of Pt/HY(2.6) >Pt/HZSM-5> Pt/HY(40) >Pt/HY(100).

HDO of guaiacol

Figure 1 compares the catalytic activities of Pt/HY(40) and Pt/HZSM-5(15) for the HDO of guaiacol. Pt/HY(40) showed higher guaiacol conversion than Pt/HZSM-5(15). In the case of Pt/HZSM-5(15) as a catalyst, guaiacol conversion was as low as 13.8%. Such low conversion might be related to the pore size in their structure because the acid site strength of HZSM-5 was the strongest among the catalysts used.

Figure 1: Conversions of guaiacol over Pt/HY (40) and Pt/HZSM-5 (15).
figure 1

Guaiacol was unable to penetrate the pores where most of the acid sites were located, because the maximum pore size of HZSM-5 (0.63 nm14) was smaller than the kinetic diameter of guaiacol (0.668 nm). Therefore, the small number of acid sites on the external surface of the ZSM-5 particles might participate in the conversion of guaiacol. On the other hand, the diffusion of guaiacol toward the acid sites inside Pt/HY is expected to be easier than that inside Pt/HZSM-5, because HY has a larger pore size (0.74 × 0.74 nm) that is sufficient to allow guaiacol to pass inside the acid sites. The larger pore size of Pt/HY might be the main reason for the better conversion of guaiacol. Hong et al. reported that three types of catalysts (Pt/HY, Pt/HZSM-5, and Pt/HBeta) showed high levels of phenol conversion (kinetic diameter: ca. 0.606 nm) in the HDO of phenol9. Considering the high conversion of the three catalysts for the HDO of phenol, the difference in the experimental results between previous reports and the present study were attributed mainly to the difference in the molecular size between guaiacol and phenol.

Figure 2 shows the effects of Si/Al on the catalytic activity of 0.5 wt.% Pt/HY. As the Si/Al molar ratio was increased from 2.6 to 100, the level of guaiacol conversion decreased from 82.9% to 23.5%.

Figure 2: Effect of Si/Al molar ratio of support on the catalytic activity of Pt/HY.
figure 2

The conversion of guaiacol appears to be related to the number of acid sites. The total number of acid sites increased with decreasing Si/Al molar ratio. A larger number of acid sites enhances the possibility for the conversion of guaiacol. Therefore, an increase in guaiacol conversion is due to an increase in the number of acid sites. Zhu et al. reported that bifunctional Pt/H-Beta, which contains both strong acid sites and metal particles, has a three-fold higher turn-over frequency for the HDO of anisole than Pt/SiO2, which possesses few weak acid sites12. They insisted that the Brönsted acid sites near the Pt particles have a synergistic effect in enhancing the HDO of anisole. Lee et al.11 reported that the acidity of the support affected the catalytic activity of the bifunctional Rh catalyst for the hydroconversion of guaiacol. In this study, a decrease in the Si/Al molar ratio of Pt/HY increased the conversion of guaiacol. The Brönsted acid sites near the Pt particles might be related to the synergistic effect because a decrease in Si/Al molar ratio means an increase in the number of acid sites in Pt/HY. The experimental results are in good agreement with previous results.

Table 1 lists the major compounds produced from the HDO of guaiacol. The most abundant compound was cyclohexane. Considering the high octane number of cyclohexane (~83), the bio-oil produced from the catalytic conversion by Pt/HY might be a promising alternative transportation fuel (gasoline). Ahmad et al.15 also reported that cyclohexane compounds in bio-oil produced from the HDO of biomass are potential alternative transportation fuels.

Table 1 Yields (wt%) of main products from HDO of guaiacol over Pt/HY with different Si/Al.

In addition to the production of mono-cyclic cyclohexane, bicyclic 1,1′-biyclohexyl was also observed according to the Si/Al molar ratio of Pt/HY. Considering the future use of bio-oil as an alternative or complementary fuel to diesel and jet fuel, the proportion of cyclopentylmethyl-cyclohexane and 1,1′-biyclohexyl (cetane number: 51) in bio-oil might be a crucial factor. In this study, Pt/HY(40) produced more bicyclic 1,1′-biyclohexyl than Pt/HY(2.6). The high density of acid sites [Pt/HY(2.6)] might prefer mono-molecular dehydration for mono-cyclic cyclohexane over bimolecular alkylation for bicyclic 1,1′-bicyclohexyl16. The combination of Brönsted acid sites and local confinements in zeolite is a critical factor for the formation of bicyclic compounds. In particular, large pore zeolites (Y and beta) showed higher catalytic activities because of their pore shapes and sizes16,17. Zhao et al. reported that palladium supported on H-beta zeolite exhibited selective catalytic hydroalkylation and deoxygenation to produce bicycloalkanes16.

Based on the experimental results and previous reports, the ratio of metal sites to acid sites should be optimized to determine the proper quality of bio-oil from the HDO of biomass.

HDO of phenol, anisole and veratrole

As listed in Table 1, the HDO of guaiacol at 250 °C produced a range of products, such as veratrole (1,2-dimethoxybenzene), anisole (methoxybenzene), 2-methoxy-4-methylphenol, phenol, methylcyclopentane, and 1,1-bicyclohexyl, in addition to the main product, cyclohexane. Among other product components, veratrole, anisole, cresol, and phenol are well-known reaction intermediates of the catalytic conversion processes of guaiacol13,18,19,20. The main reactions of the HDO of guaiacol include direct hydrogenation, dehydration, direct deoxygenation, demethylation, methylation, and transalkylation19,21. Anisole is produced when the hydroxyl group (−OH) of guaiacol is removed by deoxygenation, whereas phenol is produced from the deoxygenation of catechol, which is formed by the demethylation of guaiacol, or from the direct demethoxylation of guaiacol. The demethylation of anisole also produces phenol22. Veratrole, which is an early reaction intermediate of the HDO of guaiacol, is reportedly produced from the intramolecular methyl transfer of guaiacol23. Cresol is formed from the dehydration of methylcatechol and the methylation of phenol as well as from the transalkylation of anisole20,24. In this study, however, catechol was not detected. According to Zhao et al.25, catechol can be detected only when the reaction duration is short. They reported that catechol was detected when the reaction duration was controlled to 0.3 min using a packed bed reactor. The detection of catechol with a high reaction rate would be difficult in such a batch reactor, as used in this study.

To elucidate the reaction pathway from guaiacol to cyclohexane over Pt/HY catalysts, the HDO of the main reaction intermediate components, anisole, veratrole, and phenol, were performed and the intermediate products of those reactions were analyzed. Figure 3 shows the conversions of phenol, anisole, and veratrole as well as the selectivity toward cyclohexane. The conversion of phenol was very high, 92.9% at 10 min. The conversion of veratrole was also quite high (70.7%), whereas that of anisole was very low (1.4%). The selectivity toward the final product, cyclohexane, from anisole was close to 100%, whereas those from phenol and veratrole were 70% and 15%, respectively.

Figure 3
figure 3

Effect of reaction time on (a) the conversion of anisole, veratrole and phenol, (b) the selectivity of cyclohexane over Pt/HY(2.6).

The main products from the HDO of veratrole were cyclohexane, cyclohexanone, methyl cyclopentane, 4-methylveratrole, anisole, phenol, guaiacol, and methylguaiacols (Table 2). Combined with the results shown in Fig. 3, this suggests that veratrole is converted to cyclohexane via several different reaction pathways. One interesting observation was that a considerable amount of guaiacol was observed as a reaction intermediate of the HDO of veratrole, which in turn is a reaction intermediate of the HDO of guaiacol. This suggests that veratrole produced by the transalkylation of guaiacol may be converted back to guaiacol through dimethylation.

Table 2 Yields (wt%) of main products from HDO of anisole, veratrole and phenol over Pt/HY(2.6).

As shown in Fig. 3, the HDO reaction of phenol over the Pt/HY catalyst is very fast and the selectivity toward cyclohexane remains high throughout the reaction time, indicating that equilibrium is reached at an early stage of the reaction. Various bicyclic products, such as cyclohexyl benzene, cyclopentylmethyl cyclohexane, and 1,1′-bicyclohexyl, appeared during the HDO of anisole and phenol, resulting from C-C coupling, e.g., due to aldol condensation9,20,26. Apparently, most of the anisole was converted to cyclohexane with only the marginal production of methyl cyclopentane, methyl cyclohexane, 2,4-dimethyl anisole, 1,1′-bicyclohexyl, and cyclohexyl benzene, suggesting that the reaction pathway from anisole to cyclohexane might be relatively simple.

In addition, the HDO reactions of phenol and anisole were carried out at a lower temperature 150 °C to identify the intermediates more reliably. The main products of the HDO of phenol for 2 h at 150 °C were cyclohexane (31.09%), cyclohexanone (1.57%), and 1,1′-bicyclohexyl (3.07%). Cyclohexanone, as a product of the hydrogenation of phenol, has been reported repeatedly27.

One important product of the hydrogenation of phenol at 150 °C that was not detected in the HDO at 250 °C was cyclohexanol (45.49%). Cyclohexanol is eventually converted to cyclohexane via consecutive dehydration and hydrogenation20. The main products of the HDO of anisole at 150 °C were cyclohexane (63.87%) and 1-methoxycyclohexane (1.41%), the latter of which was not detected in the HDO at 250 °C. 1-Methoxycyclohexane is formed when the benzene ring of anisole is converted to a saturated ring through hydrogenation, as observed previously in low-temperature HDO over Ni/C, Ni/CeO2, and Ni/SBA-157. Methoxycyclohexane is converted to cyclohexane through demethoxylation and demethylation. During the HDO of a bio-oil model compound with two functional groups, such as guaiacol and veratrole, C-O cleavage through demethoxylation and dehydration takes place first removing one functional group28, which is then followed by saturation of the benzene ring through hydrogenation of the single-functional-group species, such as phenol and anisole, and ensuing demethylation-dehydration that removes the remaining C-O bond.

Therefore, the number of functional groups is believed to affect the reaction pathway of the HDO. Figure 4 presents a proposed mechanism for the conversion of guaiacol to cyclohexane over the Pt/HY catalyst deduced from the results of this study and previous reports.

Figure 4: Proposed reaction mechanism for conversion of guaiacol to cyclohexane over Pt/HY.
figure 4

HDO of Bio-oil

HDO has attracted considerable attention as an alternative to pyrolysis because of the number of drawbacks of bio-oil, including low heating value and carbon content, high oxygen and moisture content, and high viscosity29,30,31. On the other hand, although the catalytic HDO of the lignin monomer, guaiacol, has been studied intensively, there has been little research on the catalytic HDO of actual bio-oil.

Table 3 lists the water content, pH, and viscosity of raw bio-oil and hydrodeoxygenated oil. The cork oak-derived bio-oil used in this study had a typically low pH ranging from 2 to 3, which is similar to those of bio-oils derived from other biomass, such as rice husk32, pine sawdust33, and miscanthus sinensis34. The moisture content was 22.4% and the viscosity was quite high (18.3 cSt). The HDO reaction increased the pH to 4.6 and reduced the viscosity to 2.4 cSt, whereas the moisture content was decreased only slightly.

Table 3 Physical properties raw bio-oil and HDO bio-oil.

Elemental analysis of oil is essential to evaluate the oxygen removal of HDO. Table 4 presents the results of elemental analysis and heating value measurements. To reduce the effects of the solvent, light compounds, such as ethanol and ethyl acetate, were removed through vacuum distillation at 70 °C before elemental analysis.

Table 4 Elemental composition and heating value of raw bio-oil and HDO bio-oil.

The HDO over 5 wt.% Pt/HY(2.6) reduced the oxygen content from 49.3% to 28.2%, while increasing the carbon content from 41.5% to 61.1%, resulting in a high heating value calculated to be 24.4 MJ/kg. This high oxygen removal efficiency confirms that HDO can be applied to actual bio-oil.

Conclusions

Platinum-loaded HY zeolites with different Si/Al molar ratios were used as catalysts for the HDO of guaiacol to various hydrocarbons. The yield of cyclohexane, which is the major product of the HDO of guaiacol, increased with decreasing Si/Al molar ratio. The results suggest that the proportion of platinum metal particles to Brönsted acid sites in zeolite needs to be optimized to achieve the maximum production of cyclohexane and alkylated cyclic compounds with a higher octane number. The reaction pathway from guaiacol to cyclohexane was deduced from the results of the HDO of the reaction intermediates (anisole, veratrole, and phenol). HDO of the bio-oil produced from actual cork oak reduced the oxygen content efficiently, leading to an increased heating value.

Experimental

Preparation of Pt/HY catalysts

Proton-exchanged Y zeolites with different Si/Al molar ratios (2.6, 40, 100) were used as the catalyst supports. HY(Si/Al = 2.6) and HY(Si/Al = 40) were purchased from Zeolyst, and HY(Si/Al = 100) was obtained from Tosoh Corporation. Platinum was incorporated on these supports by the incipient wetness method using tetraammineplatinum(II) nitrate (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥50.0% Pt basis) as a precursor. After impregnating the platinum precursor, the samples were dried completely at 110 °C for 24 h, and then calcined in air at 500 °C for 3 h to prepare 0.5 wt.% or 5.0 wt.% Pt/HY. HZSM-5(Si/Al = 15) was also purchased from Zeolyst and 0.5 wt.% Pt/HZSM-5 was prepared by the impregnation of tetraammineplatinum(II) nitrate on HZSM-5.

Characterization of the catalysts

The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms at −196 °C were obtained using an automated gas sorption system (TriStar, Micromeritics). The surface areas of the samples were calculated using the BET (Brunauer-Emmett-Teller) method with a nitrogen partial pressure ranging from 0.05 to 0.235,36. The surface acid site properties were determined by the temperature-programmed desorption of NH3 (NH3-TPD) with a BELCAT (BEL Japan Inc.) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) to quantify the ammonia desorbed from the catalyst surface.

Product analysis

Karl Fischer titration (870 KF Titrino plus, Metrohm) was used to measure the moisture content of the oil. Viscosity measurement was taken using a capillary type viscometer (Cannon) at 40 °C based on ASTM D 445. The pH of bio-oil was measured using a digital pH meter (Starter 300, Ohaus). The C, H and N contents were measured by elemental analysis using the Flash EA 2000 series (Thermo Fisher).

Reaction conditions for HDO

The catalyst was reduced with hydrogen gas at 500 °C for 3h. For the HDO of guaiacol, 0.4 g of reduced catalyst and 40 ml of a 7.5 wt.% guaiacol (TCI, ≥98.0%) solution in decane (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥99%) were placed in a batch type reactor.

Most (96.8%) of the decane used as the solvent remained unchanged, only producing 0.18% of methyl nonane and 0.05% of dodecane, indicating that it was not involved in the HDO reaction. The inside of the batch type reactor was purged 3 times with high purity hydrogen gas. The total hydrogen pressure of the reactor was then increased to 40 bar. After adjusting the pressure, the reactor temperature was increased from room temperature to 250 °C at 5 °C/min and maintained at 250 °C for 2 h with a stirring speed of 400 rpm.

The HDO experiments of anisole (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.7%), 1,2-dimethoxybenzene (veratole) (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.0%), and phenol (Samchum, 99.0%) were carried out in the same manner as that of guaiacol using 0.5 wt.% Pt/HY(2.6). In addition, the HDO of a bio-oil derived from the fast pyrolysis of actual cork oak was also performed using 5 wt.% Pt/HY (2.6).

Because decane, which is used as the solvent in the HDO of the model compounds, does not dissolve lignin-derived oil, anhydrous ethyl alcohol (Samchun, 99.9%), which is used frequently for the HDO of bio-oil32,33,34 was used instead. Ethanol is not only a solvent but is also involved in the reaction37. The mass ratio of cork oak bio-oil and ethanol was 1:1 and the total mass was 40 g. 1.0-g HY(Si/Al = 2.6) with 5 wt.% Pt impregnated was reduced using the same method. While HDO of the model compound used a relatively small mass (7.5 wt.%) of the compound to reveal the reaction pathway accurately, HDO of the actual bio-oil used a larger quantity of oil because bio-oil is composed of a variety of components and fuel quality evaluations through the determination of acidity, viscosity, moisture content, and elemental composition need to be performed. Accordingly, the catalyst mass and its noble metal content were also increased. The reaction duration, temperature and stirring speed were the same as those used for the HDO of model compound. The hydrogen pressure was 70 bar.

After the reaction, the reactor was cooled to room temperature to obtain a liquid sample of the reaction product. These samples were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC/MS, Agilent Technologies). Ultra ALLOY-5 (MS/HT) (5% diphenyl and 95% dimethylpolysiloxane, length 30 m, i.d. 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.5 μm, Frontier Laboratories Ltd. Japan) was used as the metal capillary column.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Lee, H. et al. Catalytic Hydrodeoxygenation of Bio-oil Model Compounds over Pt/HY Catalyst. Sci. Rep. 6, 28765; doi: 10.1038/srep28765 (2016).

References

  1. Lee, E. H. et al. Hydrodeoxygenation of guaiacol over Pt loaded zeolitic materials. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 37, 18–21 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoosuk, B., Boonpo, J., Udomsap, P. & Sukkasi, S. Investigation of operating parameters of water extraction processes for improving bio-oil quality. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 31, 2229–2236 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Soya, R. et al. Synergetic effect of biomass mixture on pyrolysis kinetics and biocrude-oil characteristics. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 33, 603–609 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Resasco, D. E. & Crossley, S. P. Implementation of concepts derived from model compound studies in the separation and conversion of bio-oil to fuel. Catal. Today 257, 185–199 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, H. W. et al. Upgrading of bio-oil derived from biomass constituents over hierarchical unilamellar mesoporous MFI nanosheets. Catal. Today 232, 119–126 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ko, C. H., Park, S. H., Jeon, J. K., Suh, D. J., Jeong, K. E. & Park, Y. K. Upgrading of biofuel by the catalytic deoxygenation of biomass. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 29, 1657–1665 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, Y. et al. Effect of metal–support interaction on the selective hydrodeoxygenation of anisole to aromatics over Ni-based catalysts. Appl. Catal. B: Environ . 145, 91–100 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saidi, M. et al. Upgrading of lignin-derived bio-oils by catalytic hydrodeoxygenation. Energy Environ. Sci. 7 103–129 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong, D. Y., Miller, S. J., Agrawal, P. K. & Jones, C. W. Hydrodeoxygenation and coupling of aqueous phenolics over bifunctional zeolite-supported metal catalysts. Chem. Commun. 46 1038–1040 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Horáček, J., Šťávová, G., Kelbichová, V. & Kubička, D. Zeolite-Beta-supported platinum catalysts for hydrogenation/hydrodeoxygenation of pyrolysis oil model compounds. Catal. Today 204, 38–45 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, C. R. et al. Catalytic roles of metals and supports on hydrodeoxygenation of lignin monomer guaiacol. Catal. Commun. 17, 54–58 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu, X., Lobban, L. L., Mallinson, R. G. & Resasco, D. E. Bifunctional transalkylation and hydrodeoxygenation of anisole over Pt/HBeta catalyst. J. Catal. 281, 21–29 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nimmanwudipong, T., Runnebaum, R. C., Block, D. E. & Gates, B. C. Catalytic conversion of guaiacol catalyzed by platinum supported on alumina: Reaction network including hydrodeoxygenation reactions. Energy Fuels 25, 3417–3427 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, K., Kim, K. H. & Brown, R. C. Catalytic pyrolysis of individual components of lignocellulosic biomass. Green Chem. 16, 727–735 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmad, M. M., Nordin, M. F. R. & Azizan, M. T. Upgrading of bio-oil into high-value hydrocarbons via hydrodeoxygenation. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 7, 746–755 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao, C., Camaioni, D. M. & Lercher, J. A. Selective catalytic hydroalkylation and deoxygenation of substituted phenols to bicylcoalkanes. J. Catal. 288, 92–103 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruddy, D. A. et al. Recent advances in heterogeneous catalysts for bio-oil upgrading “ex situ catalytic fast pyrolysis”: catalyst development through the study of model compounds. Green Chem. 16, 454–490 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, J. et al. Carbon-supported bimetallic Pd–Fe catalysts for vapor-phase hydrodeoxygenation of guaiacol. J. Catal. 306, 47–57 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, S. K. et al. Atmospheric Hydrodeoxygenation of Guaiacol over Alumina-, Zirconia-, and Silica-Supported Nickel Phosphide Catalysts. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 1, 349–358 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nimmanwudipong, T., Runnebaum, R. C., Block, D. E. & Gates, B. C. Catalytic Reactions of Guaiacol: Reaction Network and Evidence of Oxygen Removal in Reactions with Hydrogen. Catal. Lett. 141, 779–783 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bykova, M. V. et al. Stabilized Ni-based catalysts for bio-oil hydrotreatment: Reactivity studies using guaiacol. Catal. Today 220, 21–31 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Loricera, C. V. et al. Hydrogenolysis of anisole over mesoporous sulfided CoMoW/SBA-15(16) catalysts. Catal. Today 172, 103–110 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, H. W. et al. Catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of 2-methoxy phenol and dibenzofuran over Pt/mesoporous zeolites. Energy 81, 33–40 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Foster, A. J., Do, P. T. & Lobo, R. F. The synergy of the support acid function and the metal function in the catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of m-cresol. Top. Catal . 55, 118–128 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao, H. Y., Li, D., Bui, P. & Oyama, S. T. Hydrodeoxygenation of guaiacol as model compound for pyrolysis oil on transition metal phosphide hydroprocessing catalysts. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 391, 305–310 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Güvenatam, B., Kurşun, O., Heeres, E. H., Pidko, E. A. & Hensen, E. J. Hydrodeoxygenation of mono-and dimeric lignin model compounds on noble metal catalysts. Catal. Today 233, 83–91 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao, C., Kasakov, S., He, J. & Lercher, J. A. Comparison of kinetics, activity and stability of Ni/HZSM-5 and Ni/Al2O -HZSM-5 for phenol hydrodeoxygenation. J. Catal. 296, 12–23 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Foo, G. S., Rogers, A. K., Yung, M. M. & Sievers, C. Steric Effect and Evolution of Surface Species in the Hydrodeoxygenation of Bio-oil Model Compounds over Pt/HBEA. ACS Catal . 6, 1292–1307 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tang, Z., Zhang, Y. & Guo, Q. Catalytic hydrocracking of pyrolytic lignin to liquid fuel in supercritical ethanol. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49, 2040–2046 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li, R., Li, B., Yang, T., Xie, Y. & Kai, X. Production of bio-oil from rice stalk supercritical ethanol liquefaction combined with the torrefaction process. Energy Fuels 28, 1948–1955 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, Z., Sui, S., Wang, F., Wang, Q. & Pittman, C. U. Catalytic Conversion of Bio-Oil to Oxygen-Containing Fuels by Acid-Catalyzed Reaction with Olefins and Alcohols over Silica Sulfuric Acid. Energies 6, 4531–4550 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dang, Q. et al. Experimental study on bio-oil upgrading over catalyst in supercritical ethanol. Fuel 103, 683–692 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu, X. et al. Upgrading of bio-oil using supercritical 1-butanol over a Ru/C heterogeneous catalyst: role of the solvent. Energy Fuels 28, 4611–4621 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Oh, S., Hwang, H., Choi, H. S. & Choi, J. W. The effects of noble metal catalysts on the bio-oil quality during the hydrodeoxygenative upgrading process. Fuel 153, 535–543 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Park, S. H., Cho, H. Y., Ryu, C. & Park, Y. K. Removal of copper(II) in aqueous solution using pyrolytic biochars derived from red macroalga Porphyra tenera . J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 36, 314–319 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ko, J. H. et al. Effect of surfactant, HCl and NH3 treatments on the regeneration of waste activated carbon in selective catalytic reduction unit. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 32, 109–112 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen, Y. et al. Direct liquefaction of Dunaliella tertiolecta for bio-oil in sub/supercritical ethanol–water. Bioresour. Technol . 124, 190–198 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sheng, C. & Azevedo, J. L. T. Estimating the higher heating value of biomass fuels from basic analysis data. Biomass Bioenerg. 28, 499–507 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIP) (No. 2015R1A2A2A11001193).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.-K.P. proposed, planned and designed the experiments. H.L., H.K. and M.J.Y. performed experiments. H.L., J.K.J., S.C.J. and S.H.P. contributed to the data analysis. H.L., H.K., C.H.K., J.J. and S.H.P. wrote the main manuscript text. Y.K.P. supervised the whole work. All authors read and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Kwon Park.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, H., Kim, H., Yu, M. et al. Catalytic Hydrodeoxygenation of Bio-oil Model Compounds over Pt/HY Catalyst. Sci Rep 6, 28765 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28765

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28765

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing