Article | Open

Inverse spin Hall effect in a complex ferromagnetic oxide heterostructure

  • Scientific Reports 6, Article number: 28727 (2016)
  • doi:10.1038/srep28727
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

We present spin pumping and inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE) in an epitaxial complex oxide heterostructure. Ferromagnetic La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 (LSMO) is used as a source of spin pumping while the spin sink exhibiting the ISHE consists of SrRuO3 (SRO). SRO is a ferromagnetic oxide with metallic conductivity, however, with a Curie temperature (TC) of 155 K, thus well below room temperature. This choice allows to perform the experiment above and below TC of the SRO and to demonstrate that SRO not only shows an ISHE of a magnitude comparable to Pt (though with opposite sign) in its non magnetic state but also exhibits a finite ISHE even 50 K below TC.

Introduction

The conversion of pure spin currents into charge currents has widely been investigated over the past decade and a large variety of materials have been used in these experiments1,2,3,4,5. In the prototypical setup a ferromagnet is excited to ferromagnetic resonance using a microwave signal. The resulting precession of the magnetization causes a spin current into an adjacent conducting material6. This spin current cannot be measured directly but first needs to be converted into a charge current or a voltage7,8. This so called spin-charge conversion can either be achieved by measuring spin-accumulation using secondary ferromagnetic contacts as spin selective voltage probes9 or using the ISHE5,8. Especially the ISHE has been of increasing importance over the last years. Reasons are not only the simplicity of the necessary experimental setup but also the possible application of SHE and ISHE in spintronics. The spin Hall effect can for example be used to increase the efficiency of spin transfer torque for MRAM application10 and the ISHE is not only an excellent candidate for measuring pure spin currents but is even under consideration for energy harvesting by converting spin currents generated by thermal gradients into electricity11. The materials which are used to measure the ISHE are plenty. Most of them are metals like Pt or Au1 and more recently W12 and Ta5,10thin films. But also for organic conductors4 and inorganic semiconductors13,14ISHE has been demonstrated. In view of the multitude of available complex oxides and the prospect of future oxide thin film based electronics15,16,17,18,19it is obvious that including a complex oxide into the catalogue of suitable materials would open up new perspectives. So far, however, only for sputtered indium tin oxide the ISHE was demonstrated by Qiu et al.20. Moreover it has been shown theoretically in 2012 that the ISHE can also appear in ferromagnetic materials21 a claim which has been followed by experimental proof in the subsequent years22,23. While it is difficult to setup a suitable experiment for ferromagnetic metals it is much easier to realize it in a complex oxide heterostructure. The fact that many ferromagnetic oxides have a Curie temperature below room temperature which is normally considered as a disadvantage can greatly facilitate the experiment, because it allows for switching the magnetization on and off just by changing the temperature, which is not an option for typical metallic ferromagnets where TC is several hundreds of °C24. For our experiment we find the ideal candidate in the combination of LSMO and SRO, where both materials are ferromagnets at low temperature, however, above T = 155 K only the ferromagnetism of the LSMO prevails25.

Results

In our experiments we use a total of nine samples all based on a (30 ± 0.4) nm LSMO layer on NdGaO3 substrate. Seven of these samples are covered by SRO. The layer thickness are 1.2 nm, 1.3 nm, 2.0 nm, 3.7 nm, 9.5 nm, 11.0 nm and 23.0 nm with error bars of ±0.4 nm and are named sample 1 to 7, respectively. The two remaining samples are used as reference samples, one without any cap layer on the LSMO and the other covered by (8 ± 1) nm of Pt. These two samples are referred to as reference 1 and reference 2, respectively. In a first set of measurements on sample 2 and reference 1 and 2 we determine the DC voltage over the sample during microwave excitation at a frequency of 9.6 GHz and a temperature of 190 K which is above TC of SRO but below the TC of LSMO (Fig. 1c). The magnetic field μ0Hext is swept from below to above the resonance field for the LSMO and the measurement is repeated for different in-plane alignments of the magnetic field in steps of 5°. This set of measurements is performed on all three samples. For the analysis it is necessary to remove the contributions which stem from RF-rectification due to anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR) which can occur in a conducting ferromagnet under RF excitation. For certain conditions the precessing magnetization can cause the resistance to oscillate in phase with the induced RF currents, leading to rectification and DC voltages26. Only when the external field is perpendicular to the RF field no rectification is expected. These AMR-caused voltages need to be carefully separated from the ISHE voltage in order to extract the right result as has been shown by Obstbaum et al.27. Furthermore, the microwave currents that are coupled inductively or capacitively to the conducting bilayer have to be considered27. These currents might cause an additional Oersted field. The effect can be particularly pronounced in lithographically defined structures where the waveguide has a thickness comparable to that of the bilayer. In our case, however, the waveguide is macroscopic and a conservative estimate shows that any contribution from this effect is several orders of magnitude below the ISHE that we observe.

Scheme 1: Measurement geometry for separating the ISHE voltage from the AMR-generated voltage.
Figure 1

(a) Sample placed on waveguide separated by an electrically isolating coating. The generated voltage can be measured between the two contacts on the sample sides. (b) Depiction of the ISHE voltage generation. A spin current js generated by spin pumping from the LSMO into the SRO is converted to a charge current jc. (c) H-dependence of the generated voltage signal for two directions φ = 0 and φ = 180° for the three types of samples at a temperature of T = 190 K. For the LSMO/Pt and the LSMO/SRO samples a symmetric shape of the line is dominant, whereas for the pure LSMO sample, where only AMR contributes to the voltage signal, the symmetric component vanishes. Note that the voltage has opposite sign for SRO and Pt (d) Angular dependence of the symmetric and antisymmetric contribution from fits to VDC = As × Ls(H) + Ba × La(H) + offset. At φ = 0 and φ = 180°, both symmetric and antisymmetric contribution become negligible. Nevertheless, for the LSMO/SRO and LSMO/Pt sample a clear symmetric contribution is present which does not contain any contribution from AMR.

As a first step we compare the voltage signal generated in the LSMO/SRO heterostructure (sample 2) with that of a single LSMO layer of the same thickness (reference 1). We fit the data by a lorentzian line shape with a symmetric and an antisymmetric part. According to Obstbaum et al.27 the ISHE voltage only results in a symmetric contribution, while the signal from AMR can result in both, symmetric and antisymmetric contributions. Figure 1d shows that for the single LSMO layer symmetric and antisymmetric contributions of finite amplitudes are generated at different magnetization directions in the sample plane. Only when the external magnetic field is directed along the waveguide (φ = 0 or φ = 180°), no DC voltage can be measured as is expected from theory26. We can thus conclude in reverse that for this alignment of the magnetic field any DC voltage generated in other LSMO based heterostructures does not stem from AMR rectification. It should be noted that both symmetric and antisymmetric contribution vanish at this particular angle because in the bilayer samples the vanishing antisymmetric contribution still shows that the angle is correctly aligned. Nevertheless, a possible misalignment of the angle might still lead to unwanted contributions from AMR. A simple estimate, however, shows that a misalignment of at least 10° would be necessary to provide an artifact of the observed magnitude while we can guarantee an alignment accuracy better than 1°. Asymmetries from the silver-glue electrodes can also be excluded because measurements with waveguides where the contacts are far away from the excitation region still show the same effect. Sample inhomogeneities are also negligible because the epitaxial quality of the layers is very high as has been shown by X-ray diffraction (see also sample fabrication).

For reference 2 (LSMO/Pt) the Pt has a much lower resistance than the LSMO and represents a short circuit for the AMR-generated signal while creating a strong ISHE voltage by itself. The angle dependent measurements (Fig. 1d) confirm that in this sample the maximum DC signal appears for the angle at which no AMR signal could be observed for reference sample 1, as expected from geometric considerations.

For LSMO/SRO heterostructures the result represents a mixture of the two because the SRO has much lower conductivity than Pt and thus a sizeable AMR contribution from the LSMO remains visible. For SRO the ISHE has the opposite sign when compared to Pt, which has also previously been observed for Mo1, Ta10 and W12.

Please note that in all measurements, a constant background has been subtracted which was independent from the direction and magnitude of the magnetic field.

For further analysis we limit ourselves to the amplitude of the symmetric contribution which can be precisely determined at the angle where the AMR signal and thus the antisymmetric contribution vanishes completely as we have shown for the pure LSMO layer (broken line in Fig. 1d). In this case, the spin Hall voltage can be written as

if out-of-plane excitation is neglected. The formula is derived as described in other publications1,2,27and contains the thicknesses tFM and tNM and conductivities σFM and σNM of LSMO and SRO, respectively, the saturation magnetization of the LSMO layer (MS), the length l over which excitation takes place, the excitation field in y-direction (hy), the excitation frequency (ω/2π) and the susceptibilities of the precessing magnetization at resonance ( and ).

To determine the spin Hall angle ΘSH of the SRO, the spin-diffusion length λSD of the SRO and the spin-mixing conductance g↑↓ of the LSMO/SRO interface must be determined. The latter is obtained by comparing the damping parameter α = 1.8 × 10−3 of the SRO-covered LSMO layer with that of the bare LSMO layer α0 = 4.1 × 10−4 similar to Azevedo et al.2. For this purpose FMR measurements are performed in the frequency range from 2 GHz to 37 GHz for both samples (Fig. 2b) and the damping parameters are extracted from the line widths. This yields a spin mixing conductance of g↑↓ = (1.1 ± 0.3) × 1019 m−2. To calculate the spin diffusion length λSD we measure the ISHE voltage on a total of seven samples with varying thickness of the SRO. The results are shown in Fig. 2a. These values are fit to

Scheme 2: Quantitative analysis of the voltage generated by ISHE at T = 190 K.
Figure 2

(a) ISHE voltage as a function of the paramagnetic SRO thickness with a fixed thickness of the ferromagnetic LSMO of 30 nm. From the fit to equation (2) a spin diffusion length of λSD = (1.5 ± 0.6) nm is obtained. (b) FMR linewidth as a function of resonance frequency. The damping parameters for the LSMO layer (reference 1) and one of the LSMO/SRO bilayers (sample 3) are determined from the slope. This data is used to calculate the spin mixing conductance of the LSMO/SRO interface. Note that a zero-frequency linewidth of more than 3 mT is present. This inhomogeneous line broadening is not associated with the investigated effect. It originates in material imperfections and does not influence our analysis as it is equal in both samples.

as suggested by Mosendz et al.1 resulting in λSD = (1.5 ± 0.6) nm. To determine the LSMO and SRO conductivities the conductivities of all bilayers are determined from 2-probe resistance measurements at a temperature at 190 K using the same leads as employed in the ISHE experiment as voltage probes. We use the relation σbilayer(tNM + tFM) = σNMtNM + σFMtFM to evaluate the conductivities. The conductivity of the LSMO is determined as σLSMO = (5.0 ± 0.8) × 104 Ω−1 m−1 on a bare layer of LSMO and furthermore assumed as constant for all samples because all LSMO layers involved are grown with the same thickness and growth parameters. From the resistance of the bilayers the SRO conductivities are then calculated. Except for the bilayer with thinnest SRO layer (sample 1), the conductivity only slightly increases for the lower layer thicknesses but can be treated as constant within the error bars that are introduced due to the uncertainty of the layer thickness. For the questionable sample 1, we have to assume different material quality which may affect other physical properties. Therefore we exclude this sample from the analysis. The conductivity of the SRO is σSRO = (7.5 ± 1.1) × 105 Ω−1 m−1. For the Pt sample we get σPt = (1.8 ± 0.5) × 107 Ω−1 m−1. In addition we use MS = (3.8 ± 0.8) × 105 A/m from SQUID-magnetometry, l = 600 μm (width of the signal line), hy = 20 A/m from DC-current approximation of the field generated by the input power of 40 mW, ω/2π = 9.6 GHz and the susceptibilities calculated from the ferromagnetic resonance and we obtain |ΘSH| = (0.027 ± 0.018) at T = 190 K with the sign being opposite to that of the spin Hall angle of Pt.

In further experiments we measure the temperature dependence of the effect from 100 K to 300 K to investigate the influence of the ferromagnetism in SRO which has a Curie-temperature of 155 K. Figure 3a additionally shows the magnetization of the LSMO/SRO bilayer during cooldown in a field of 0.2 mT measured by SQUID magnetometry. The curve is typical for LSMO/SRO because the SRO tends to couple antiferromagnetically to the LSMO effectively reducing the total magnetization28. Figure 3c, however, shows hysteresis loops at different temperatures and for taken either in-plane or perpendicular to plane. Although these measurements show that the total in-plane magnetization of the LSMO barely changes when SRO is below TC, it cannot be concluded that the direction of magnetization remains constant in the applied magnetic field. A deviation in angle of 10° or less would barely show up in the measurement because it only determines the projection of the magnetization on the magnetic field. It can, however, be concluded that no additional out-of-plane magnetization appears as might be expected for single SRO layers25. In addition, a large increase in coercive field (both in- and out-of-plane) occurs when the SRO becomes ferromagnetic indicating a coupling between the two layers. It should be noted that the saturation magnetization of SRO is much smaller than that of LSMO (1.4 μB/Ru25 and 3.7 μB/Mn29 low temperature saturation magnetization for bulk material) which in addition with the much smaller layer thickness leads to the fact that the SQUID measurement mainly shows the magnetization of LSMO. Together with the cooling curve of the magnetization also the ISHE voltage is plotted for different temperatures. Obviously the ISHE voltage exhibits a maximum at around T = 180 K. When the temperature is increased starting from T = 180 K we observe a decay of the ISHE voltage. This is easily understood from the reduction of the magnetization (and thus the spin polarization) of the LSMO layer which also reduces the spin pumping.

Scheme 3: Temperature dependence.
Figure 3

(a) Comparing the inverse spin Hall voltage with the magnetization of the bilayer (LSMO 30 nm/SRO 1.3 nm) measured in-plane at a constant field of 0.2 mT and subtracted by a constant contribution from the paramagnetic substrate. Below TC(SRO) the voltage generated due to ISHE strongly decreases but remains finite down to T = 100 K, where it is below the detection limit. Approaching TC(LSMO) the magnetization and therefore the spin Hall voltage decreases. (b) While obve TC(SRO) the FMR linewidth is constant, there is an increase below this temperature. The FMR amplitude still has a value of 50% of the maximum at 100 K. (c) Hysteresis loops measured for out-of-plane and in-plane direction at temperatures at TC(SRO) and 35 K below and above. The curves are corrected for the linear contribution of the strongly paramagnetic substrate. It should be noted that in the field range of ±100 mT the out-of-plane magnetization is not yet saturated.

Upon cooling beyond TC(SRO) the ISHE signal slowly disappears, however, it is noteworthy that a sizeable effect persists until well below TC(SRO) confirming other experiments showing ISHE in a ferromagnetic layer22. Note that the vanishing ISHE signal does not even prove that the ISHE itself is truly absent at lower temperatures. In principle it is possible either that due to its strong crystalline anisotropy the SRO may couple to the LSMO and pull the magnetization away from the magnetic field, thus changing the geometry of the experiment or that the magnetization vector of the SRO is non-collinear to that of the LSMO and the spin polarization of the current induced by the spin pumping is changed by spin transfer torque. A decreasing FMR amplitude and an increase in linewidth below TC(SRO) (Fig. 3b) point towards the first effect, however, the second effect cannot be ruled out.

For sake of clarity also possible artifacts from thermoelectric effects due to heating of the sample on resonance should be discussed. In principle the spin heat conveyer effect30 can create a temperature gradient which can result in a thermovoltage that reverses sign when the magnetic field is reversed. In LSMO, however, the magnons are short lived and do not extend far enough to create the signals that we observe. Theoretically also the Nernst-Ettingshausen effect31 can create a similar signal. Compared to our measurements it would, however, neither show a similar dependence on temperature nor layer thickness of the SRO so it can effectively be ruled out while in the pure LSMO layer no signal is observed at all, excluding the anomalous Nernst effect32.

In summary we have shown that SRO can act as a spin sink in a fully epitaxial heterostructure consisting of two complex oxide ferromagnets. SRO exhibits ISHE with a sign opposite to that of Pt. The spin Hall angle is smaller than for Pt and the effect persists even below the Curie temperature of the SRO. The fact that the effect can be investigated directly at the phase transition opens up new possibilities for future investigation of the ISHE.

Methods

Sample preparation

Pulsed Laser Deposition (PLD) is used to deposit layers of La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 (LSMO) with a thickness of 30 nm on orthorhombic NdGaO3 (110) substrates (NGO). Subsequently without breaking the vacuum a layer of SrRuO3 (SRO) with a thickness of tNM is grown. Both materials are deposited using an oxygen pressure of 0.2 mbar at a substrate temperature of 650 °C. The laser fluency is 2.5 J/cm2 at a repetition rate of 5 Hz. Using this recipe a total number of 7 samples is fabricated with different respective thickness tNM. For each sample the layer thickness is verified by X-ray reflectometry. Furthermore for the samples with thickest SRO layer XRD measurements are carried out which are shown in Fig. 4. The presence of thickness-fringes in the ω2θ-scan indicates a low interface roughness. Complementary rocking-curves of the 220-reflex for all layers show a small contribution from mosaicity of the LSMO and SRO layers.

Scheme 4: XRD charakterisation.
Figure 4

(a) Omega-2Θ-scan of the 220-reflection of sample 7 (LSMO 30 nm/SRO 23 nm). The fit is in excellent agreement with the measurement and reproduces the thickness-fringes indicating low interface roughness. (b) Rocking curves for the same sample reveal a FWHM of 0.01° for the substrate and 0.1° for the LSMO and SRO layers. This is more than has been reported for other PLD grown oxide layers of similar thickness33,34and indicates a maximum mosaicity of 0.1° in both LSMO and SRO, respectively.

In addition two reference samples are fabricated, one single LSMO layer and one sample where the SRO is replaced by 8 nm of Pt which is also deposited without breaking the vacuum by magnetron sputtering. The samples are cleaved to approximately 2 mm times 5 mm rectangles where the substrate [001] direction is oriented along the short sides. On these sides copper leads are attached using silver glue to serve as voltage probes for the ISHE.

Measurement

Like shown in Fig. 1a samples are placed on top of a coplanar waveguide with a 600 μm wide inner conductor and 100 μm gap made of a 35 μm thick Cu layer on hydrocarbon ceramic laminate. The waveguide is electrically isolated by an approximately 100 nm thick polyimide layer. The waveguide is placed in a cryostat which is in constant magnetic field μ0Hext of a rotatable electromagnet. A microwave current is transmitted through the waveguide whose RF magnetic field excites ferromagnetic resonance and thus spin precession in the LSMO layer. As depicted in Fig. 1b the precessing magnetization causes spin pumping to the adjacent SRO layer where the ISHE leads to spin scattering and consequently in the generation of a DC voltage. The cryostat is liquid nitrogen cooled allowing for temperature dependent measurement in the range from 300 K down to 80 K. It is possible to modulate the RF amplitude and to use a lock-in amplifier to measure the ISHE or to apply a small AC magnetic field allowing for lock-in detection of the absorption and thus the ferromagnetic resonance.

Data analysis

In analogue manner to Obstbaum et al.27, the data from individual voltage measurements are fit to VDC = As × Ls(H) + Ba × La(H) + offset with Ls(H) = ΔH2/((H − Hr)2 + ΔH2) and La(H) = (H − HrH/((H − Hr)2 + ΔH2) to obtain the amplitudes for the symmetric and antisymmetric contribution of the voltage signal As and Ba respectively. For the case of φ = 0 or φ = 180°, As is equal to VISHE since any contribution from AMR becomes zero for this configuration. FMR measurements have been carried out subsequently to the voltage measurements from which the susceptibilities at resonance can be extracted.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Wahler, M. et al. Inverse spin Hall effect in a complex ferromagnetic oxide heterostructure. Sci. Rep. 6, 28727; doi: 10.1038/srep28727 (2016).

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Detection and quantification of inverse spin Hall effect from spin pumping in permalloy/normal metal bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 82, 214403 (2010).

  2. 2.

    , , , & Spin pumping and anisotropic magnetoresistance voltages in magnetic bilayers: Theory and experiment. Phys. Rev. B 83, 144402 (2011).

  3. 3.

    et al. Scaling Behavior of the Spin Pumping Effect in Ferromagnet-Platinum Bilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 046601 (2011).

  4. 4.

    , , , & Solution-processed organic spin-charge converter. Nat. Mater. 12, 622–627 (2013).

  5. 5.

    et al. Comparative measurements of inverse spin Hall effects and magnetoresistance in YIG/Pt and YIG/Ta. Phys. Rev. B 87, 174417 (2013).

  6. 6.

    , & Enhanced Gilbert Damping in Thin Ferromagnetic Films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 117601 (2002).

  7. 7.

    & Spintronics: Taming spin currents. Nat. Mater. 10, 647–648 (2011).

  8. 8.

    , & Spin Hall effect devices. Nat. Mater. 11, 382–390 (2012).

  9. 9.

    , , , & Electrical detection of spin precession in a metallic mesoscopic spin valve. Nature 416, 713–716 (2002).

  10. 10.

    et al. Spin-Torque Switching with the Giant Spin Hall Effect of Tantalum. Science 336, 555–558 (2012).

  11. 11.

    , & Spin caloritronics. Nat. Mater. 11, 391–399 (2012).

  12. 12.

    et al. Spin transfer torque devices utilizing the giant spin Hall effect of tungsten. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 122404 (2012).

  13. 13.

    & Observation of the inverse spin Hall effect in silicon. Nat. Commun. 3, 629 (2012).

  14. 14.

    , & Direct-current voltages in (Ga,Mn)As structures induced by ferromagnetic resonance. Nat. Commun. 4, 2055 (2013).

  15. 15.

    , , & The Materials Science of Functional Oxide Thin Films. Adv. Mater. 21, 3827–3839 (2009).

  16. 16.

    & Oxide Interfaces - An Opportunity for Electronics. Science 327, 1607–1611 (2010).

  17. 17.

    , & Ultrathin oxide films and interfaces for electronics and spintronics. Adv. Phys. 60, 5–84 (2011).

  18. 18.

    & Adaptive oxide electronics: A review. J. Appl. Phys. 110, 071101 (2011).

  19. 19.

    Spintronic oxides grown by laser-MBE. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45, 033001 (2012).

  20. 20.

    et al. All-oxide system for spin pumping. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 022402 (2012).

  21. 21.

    et al. Theory of the spin Hall effect, and its inverse, in a ferromagnetic metal near the Curie temperature. Phys. Rev. B 86, 241303(R) (2012).

  22. 22.

    , , & Inverse Spin Hall Effect in a Ferromagnetic Metal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 066602 (2013).

  23. 23.

    et al. Electrical detection of direct and alternating spin current injected from a ferromagnetic insulator into a ferromagnetic metal. Phys. Rev. B 89, 180404 (2014).

  24. 24.

    Introduction to Solid State Physics 8th edn, 328 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005).

  25. 25.

    et al. Structure, physical properties, and applications of SrRuO3 thin films. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 253–298 (2012).

  26. 26.

    , & Microwave photovoltage and photoresistance effects in ferromagnetic microstrips. Phys. Rev. B 76, 224430– (2007).

  27. 27.

    et al. Inverse spin Hall effect in Ni81Fe19/normal-metal bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 89, 060407 (2014).

  28. 28.

    et al. Spin Structure in an Interfacially Coupled Epitaxial Ferromagnetic Oxide Heterostructure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 237201– (2013).

  29. 29.

    et al. Controlling magnetic anisotropy in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 nanostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 052408 (2014).

  30. 30.

    et al. Unidirectional spin-wave heat conveyer. Nat. Mater. 12, 549–553 (2013).

  31. 31.

    & Ueber das Auftreten electromotorischer Kräfte in Metallplatten, welche von einem Wärmestrome durchflossen werden und sich im magnetischen Felde befinden. Ann. Phys. 265, 343–347 (1886).

  32. 32.

    , , & Unambiguous separation of the inverse spin Hall and anomalous Nernst effects within a ferromagnetic metal using the spin Seebeck effect. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 092409 (2014).

  33. 33.

    et al. Critical thickness of high structural quality SrTiO3 films grown on orthorhombic (101) DyScO3. J. Appl. Phys. 104, 114109 (2008).

  34. 34.

    et al. Scaling of Spin Hall Angle in 3d, 4d, and 5d Metals from Y3Fe5O12/Metal Spin Pumping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 197201 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Georg Woltersdorf for valuable discussions. This work was supported by the European Commission in the project IFOX under grant agreement NMP3-LA-2010-246102 and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft in the SFB 762.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institut für Physik, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, 06120, Germany

    • Martin Wahler
    • , Nico Homonnay
    • , Tim Richter
    • , Alexander Müller
    • , Christian Eisenschmidt
    •  & Georg Schmidt
  2. Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Materialwissenschaften, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Nanotechnikum Weinberg, Halle, 06120, Germany

    • Bodo Fuhrmann
    •  & Georg Schmidt

Authors

  1. Search for Martin Wahler in:

  2. Search for Nico Homonnay in:

  3. Search for Tim Richter in:

  4. Search for Alexander Müller in:

  5. Search for Christian Eisenschmidt in:

  6. Search for Bodo Fuhrmann in:

  7. Search for Georg Schmidt in:

Contributions

M.W. and T.R. designed and built the experimental setup. M.W. collected the data and performed the analysis. N.H., A.M. and B.F. prepared the samples, N.H. and C.E. carried out the X-ray characterization. G.S. planned and supervised the study, G.S. and M.W. prepared the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Schmidt.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BYThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/