Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Pressure-induced magnetic transitions with change of the orbital configuration in dimerised systems

## Abstract

We suggest a possible scenario for magnetic transition under pressure in dimerised systems where electrons are localised on molecular orbitals. The mechanism of transition is not related with competition between kinetic energy and on-site Coulomb repulsion as in Mott-Hubbard systems, or between crystal-field splitting and intra-atomic exchange as in classical atomic spin-state transitions. Instead, it is driven by the change of bonding-antibonding splitting on part of the molecular orbitals. In the magnetic systems with few half-filled molecular orbitals external pressure may result in increase of the bonding-antibonding splitting and localise all electrons on low-lying molecular orbitals suppressing net magnetic moment of the system. We give examples of the systems, where this or inverse transition may occur and by means of ab initio band structure calculations predict that it can be observed in α−MoCl4 at pressure P ~ 11 GPa.

## Introduction

In spite of a long history of the magnetic phenomena investigation, magnetism remains one of the most attractive subjects for a research due to both extensive technological applications of different magnetic materials and its exceptional fundamental importance for the science, which led to development of such conceptions and ideas as electromagnetism, spin etc. Special attention is paid to the study of formation or destruction of the local magnetic moments. There are several mechanisms responsible for this.

In strongly correlated materials local magnetic moments, which usually exist in the insulating phase, are destroyed with Mott-Hubbard transition to metallic state driven by competition of the kinetic energy (given by hopping parameter t) and Coulomb repulsion U1,2. This type of transitions can be found mainly in transition metal (TM) compounds3, while for 4f–5f systems the Kondo effect4 may lead to decrease of the measured local magnetic moment, due to screening by conduction electrons, as it occurs in metallic Ce5,6. The screening is defined by the hybridization between localised f and band s, p, d states, which can be controlled by, e.g., pressure. Another mechanism of the magnetic moment suppression is the spin-state transition, when an increase of the crystal field splitting between t2g and eg bands due to external pressure or decrease of the temperature (resulting in the lattice contraction) leads to violation of the first Hund’s rule maximizing the spin moment of an ion. This phenomenon is quite important in geophysics, since many materials constituting Earth’s crust and mantle, as e.g. (MgFe)O8, MnO9, or Na(Fe, Cr)Si2O610 do show such transitions.

All these effects are, however, related to the suppression of the magnetic moments on some particular ions, while there are situations, when these moments are formed not on atomic, but on molecular orbitals, as it occurs in (Na, K)O211, SrRu2O612, Ba4Ru3O107, Nb2O2F313 and in many other compounds. In the present paper we show that an external pressure may also induce magnetic transition in the systems with atomic complexes such as dimers, trimers etc., where electrons occupy molecular orbitals. This transition from magnetic to nonmagnetic state is possible, when there are few nearly degenerate half-filled molecular orbitals. External pressure may increase splitting and stabilise all electrons on low-lying molecular orbitals. Detailed study of this effect was performed for one of such dimerised system: α−MoCl4. By means of ab initio band structure calculations we estimated the critical pressure for the transition to nonmagnetic state in this compound.

## General Treatment

We start with an isolated dimer. Transition metals are in the ligand octahedra and these octahedra share their edges or faces (metal-metal distances in the “common corner” geometry are usually too large for the formation of molecular orbitals). There are two types of orbitals in such geometries, which we will denote as c and d. The c orbitals have a direct overlap, characterized by hopping parameter tc, with neighbouring transition metal (the a1g orbitals in the “common face”14,15 and the xy orbitals in the “common edge” geometry16), which results in a large bonding-antibonding splitting, 2tc. If there are more than one electron per site and tc is large enough (with respect to Hund’s rule coupling JH), the bonding molecular orbital is fully occupied and corresponding electrons do not contribute to the total magnetic moment of the dimer17. So that the magnetization is defined by other, d, electrons, localised on the (for face-sharing) or xz/yz (for edge-sharing) orbitals, as shown in Fig. 1(a).

These two d orbitals ( for face-sharing and xz/yz for edge-sharing geometry) are not directed to each other, so that corresponding hoppings (td1, td2) tc. It is important for us here that td1 and td2 can also be very different, since typically the TMO6 octahedra are strongly distorted in the dimerised systems. Applying external pressure one increases all the bonding-antibonding splittings, given by hopping parameters td1, td2 and tc and may suppress net magnetization, even if there was nonzero magnetic moment at ambient conditions. In a some sense this effect reminds classical atomic spin-state transition1, but instead of the crystal-field splitting here bonding-antibonding splitting between molecular orbitals competes with the Hund’s rule coupling.

It is easier to illustrate this general picture on a particular example. Let us consider dimerised system with two electrons per site, td1 ≠ td2 and (td1, td2) tc. Then two out of four electrons will occupy c bonding orbitals, while the rest two electrons provide magnetic moment, see Fig. 1(a). If these d1 and d2 orbitals are molecular orbitals then there is a gain in intra-atomic exchange energy for spin triplet (ferromagnetic) state with respect to spin singlet (antiferromagnetic) one. In the ionic limit taking into account intra-atomic Hund’s rule as and neglecting on-site Coulomb repulsion U (and hence modification of the ground state wave function from molecular orbital-like to Heitler-London) one may find that the energy of this state will be

Applying external pressure we increase all the hopping parameters tc, td1 and td2, so that finally one may end up with the situation, when not only c, but also one of the d molecular orbitals is completely filled, as shown in Fig. 1(b). The energy of this nonmagnetic state will be

Comparing last two equations one finds that the transition to the nonmagnetic state is expected, when

In real materials the situation, however, can be much more complicated. Mentioned above effect of the Hubbard U does not simply renormalize JH, but changes energetics of the bonding orbitals, which is defined solely by corresponding hopping parameter t in the absence of U and by t2/U in the large U limit. In addition the on-site energies of the d orbitals can be very different due to strong distortions of the TMO6 octahedra. However, qualitative picture is rather general: having magnetic dimerised system with few degenerate or nearly degenerate half-filled d molecular orbitals one may expect to have a transition to nonmagnetic state under external or due to internal (chemical) pressure. In order to check this effect we performed ab initio band structure calculations for α−MoCl4, which fulfills aforementioned conditions.

## Pressure-induced Magnetic Transition in α−MoCl4

The α−MoCl4 crystalizes in the NbCl4 structure consisting of Mo-Mo dimers18, see Fig. 2. Mo4+ has 4d2 electronic configuration and at ambient conditions this material is paramagnetic with positive Curie-Weiss temperature ~220 K17, which presumes net ferromagnetic exchange coupling. The effective magnetic moment is ~0.85 − 0.93μB18,19, much smaller than μeff = 2.82 μB expected for isolated Mo4+ ion having S = 1.

Suppression of the magnetic moment is related to orbital-selective effect in dimerised systems17,18. Each Mo is in the Cl6 octahedron and two neighbouring octahedra share their edges forming a dimer. As a result there has to be a strong bonding-antibonding splitting for the xy orbitals, which play a role of the c orbitals (here and below all notations are with respect to the local coordinate system, where axis are directed to Cl and x and y are in the plane of common edge and short Mo-Mo bond). Bonding xy orbitals are fully occupied and this explains experimentally observed partial suppression of the magnetic moment in this system at ambient conditions. This strong splitting ~3.2 eV is clearly seen from the nonmagnetic band structure (Fig. 3(a)), obtained in the generalized gradient approximation (GGA). In Fig. 4(a) we plotted the charge density corresponding to these bonding xy orbitals.

The xz and yz orbitals also form molecular orbitals. These are d1 and d2 orbitals in the notations of the previous section. This is clear that effective d − d hopping via Cl pz orbital is the same for xz and yz orbitals centered on different sites, but one may also maximize direct d − d hopping constructing the xz + yz orbital, see Fig. 4(b), so that systems gains maximum kinetic energy localising electrons on these xz + yz and xz − yz orbitals. Very similar situation is observed in Li2RuO321. The bonding-antibonding splitting for the xz + yz molecular orbitals is ~1.6 eV, while for xz − yz it is much smaller, ~0.2 eV.

In order to take into account strong Coulomb correlations we performed the GGA + U calculations. Constrained RPA (cRPA) calculations for metallic Mo give U − JH ~ 3 eV22. One may think that metallic Mo is very different from MoCl4 and Hubbard U in a chloride can be much larger resulting to Mott-Hubbard physics. However, an estimation of U using constrained GGA method within the Wannier function formalism23 for α − MoCl4 gives U~2.9 eV, so that one may use the cRPA result for the GGA + U calculation. The local magnetic moment in the GGA + U was found to be mtot = 0.85 μB/Mo. Analysis of the occupation matrix shows that this moment is mainly due to the xz + yz and xz − yz orbitals: mxz+yz = 0.29μB and mxzyz = 0.36μB. Because of a large spatial extension of the Mo 4d orbitals substantial portion of the spin density is on the ligands, mCl = 0.07μB/Cl.

Increasing pressure we induce magnetic transition, as it was described above in details. We studied this transition by the total energy (E) GGA + U calculations for ferromagnetic and nonmagnetic configurations for several volumes (V). Corresponding E(V) dependencies are shown in Fig. 5. The first order transition with collapse of the volume was found at critical pressure Pc = 11.2 GPa, which was estimated by fitting E(V) with the fifth order polynomial and finding its derivative10,24,25. Analysis of the occupation matrix shows that orbitals configuration indeed changes in the nonmagnetic phase, where four electrons occupy xy and xz + yz bonding orbitals, as it is shown in Fig. 1(b).

Thus, we see that the magnetic transition proposed in the previous section basing on quite general arguments does occurs in the GGA + U calculation for the real material, α−MoCl4. One may also argue that such transition can be realized in many other different systems, e.g. in WCl426 or Nb2O2F313. Moreover, an inverse transition from nonmagnetic to ferromagnetic state under tensile stress is also possible. It would be interesting to study whether such transition can be observed, e.g. in MoO2 or WO2 films grown on the substrates with larger inter-atomic distances.

It is also exciting that very similar transition seems to occur in famous half-metallic CrO2. At ambient conditions this compound is ferromagnetic and has the rutile crystal structure, where neighbouring CrO6 octahedra share their edges27. Main mechanism of the ferromagnetism is double exchange, when itinerant xy electrons make localised xz/yz electrons to have the same spin projection28. On a language of an isolated dimer this would correspond to the situation when xy is c and xz/yz are d orbitals and having two electrons per Cr site we fully occupy xy (c) orbital and leave xz/yz (d) orbitals half-filled to fulfill Hund’s rule. The LDA + U calculations show that this is exactly what is going on in CrO228. However, detailed band structure calculations shows that CrO2 undergoes structural phase transition to dimerised phase at P~70 GPa and turns out to be nonmagnetic29. This strongly reminds pressure-induced transition in α−MoCl4 discussed in the present paper.

## Conclusions

To sum up in the present paper we considered the dimerised transition metal compounds with degenerate (or nearly degenerate) half-filled magnetic molecular orbitals and showed that the pressure-induced magnetic transition is possible in this case. This transition to nonmagnetic state is related to the change of the orbital configuration and results in a strong suppression of the magnetic moment of the system. Using band structure calculations we checked that this transition does occurs in one of such systems: α−MoCl4 and argue that it can be related to stabilization of nonmagnetic state in CrO2 under high pressure.

## Methods

All calculations in this work were performed with Quantum-ESPRESSO package30 that implements the ultrasoft pseudopotential formalism in plane-waves basis. The exchange-correlation potential was taken in the form proposed in ref. 31. A kinetic energy cutoff for the plane-wave expansion of the electronic states was set to 45 Ry. Reciprocal space integration were done on a regular 8 × 8 × 8 k-points grid in the irreducible part of the Brillouin zone. In order to check reliability of pseudopotential method we calculated δE = EFM − ENM at V = 0.8 Vexp using our ultrasoft pseudopotentials and the projector augmented-wave (PAW) method32. The difference in δE in these two calculations was found to be less than 1%. The crystal structure was taken from ref. 18.

How to cite this article: Korotin, D. M. et al. Pressure-induced magnetic transitions with change of the orbital configuration in dimerised systems. Sci. Rep. 6, 25831; doi: 10.1038/srep25831 (2016).

## References

1. Khomskii, D. I. Transition Metal Compounds (Cambridge University Press, 2014).

2. Georges, A., Krauth, W. & Rozenberg, M. J. Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions. Reviews of Modern Physics 68, 13–125 (1996).

3. Imada, M., Fujimori, A. & Tokura, Y. Metal-insulator transitions. Reviews of Modern Physics 70, 1039–1263 (1998).

4. Hewson, A. C. The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions. Cambridge Studies in Magnetism (Cambridge University Press, 1997).

5. Koskenmaki, D. & Gschneidner, K. No Title. In Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths, chap. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978).

6. Streltsov, S. V. et al. Magnetic susceptibility of cerium: An LDA+DMFT study. Physical Review B 85, 195109 (2012).

7. Streltsov, S. V. & Khomskii, D. I. Unconventional magnetism as a consequence of the charge disproportionation and the molecular orbital formation in Ba4Ru3O10. Phys. Rev. B 86, 064429 (2012).

8. Skorikov, N. A., Shorikov, A. O., Skornyakov, S. L., Korotin, M. A. & Anisimov, V. I. Mechanism of magnetic moment collapse under pressure in ferropericlase. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 27, 275501 (2015).

9. Kuneš, J., Lukoyanov, A. V., Anisimov, V. I., Scalettar, R. T. & Pickett, W. E. Collapse of magnetic moment drives the Mott transition in MnO. Nat Mater 7, 198–202 (2008).

10. Streltsov, S. V. & Skorikov, N. A. Spin-state transitions in CaFeSi$_2$O$_6$ and NaFeSi$_2$O$_6$ under pressure. Phys. Rev. B 83, 214407 (2011).

11. Solovyev, I. V., Pchelkina, Z. V. & Mazurenko, V. V. Magnetism of sodium superoxide. CrysEngComm 16, 522 (2014).

12. Streltsov, S., Mazin, I. I. & Foyevtsova, K. Localized itinerant electrons and unique magnetic properties of SrRu2O6. Phys. Rev. B 92, 134408 (2015).

13. Tran, T. T. et al. Nb2O2F3: A Reduced Niobium (III/IV) Oxyfluoride with a Complex Structural, Magnetic and Electronic Phase Transition. Journal of the American Chemical Society 137, 636–639 (2015).

14. Kugel, K. I., Khomskii, D. I., Sboychakov, A. O. & Streltsov, S. V. Spin-orbital interaction for face-sharing octahedra: Realization of a highly symmetric SU(4) model. Physical Review B 91, 155125 (2015).

15. Khomskii, D. I., Kugel, K. I., Sboychakov, A. O. & Streltsov, S. V. Role of Local Geometry in the Spin and Orbital Structure of Transition Metal Compounds. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 122, 484 (2016).

16. Goodenough, J. B. Magnetism and the Chemical Bond (Interscience publishers, New York-London, 1963).

17. Streltsov, S. V. & Khomskii, D. I. Orbital-dependent singlet dimers and orbital-selective Peierls transitions in transition-metal compounds. Phys. Rev. B 89, 161112 (2014).

18. Kepert, D. & Mandyczewsky, R. a-Molybdenum Tetrachloride. A Structural Isomer Containing Molybdenum-Molybdenum Interactions. Inorg. Chem. 7, 2091 (1968).

19. Larson, M. & Moore, F. Synthesis of Molybdenenum tetrachloride. Inorganic chemistry 3, 285 (1964).

20. Streltsov, S. V. Orbital-selective behavior in Y5Mo2O12 and (Cd, Zn)V2O4. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 383, 27 (2015).

21. Kimber, S. A. J. et al. Valence bond liquid phase in the honeycomb lattice material Li$_2$RuO$_3$. Phys. Rev. B 89, 081408 (2014).

22. Sasioglu, E., Friedrich, C. & Blügel, S. Effective Coulomb interaction in transition metals from constrained random-phase approximation. Physical Review B 83, 121101 (2011).

23. Anisimov, V. I. et al. Calculation of the Coulomb Repulsion Parameter and Correlation Strength in Superconducting LaFeAsO. JETP Lett 88, 729 (2008).

24. Adams, D. & Amadon, B. Study of the volume and spin collapse in orthoferrite LuFeO$_3$ using LDA + U. Physical Review B 79, 115114 (2009).

25. Kuneš, J., Korotin, D., Korotin, M., Anisimov, V. & Werner, P. Pressure-Driven Metal-Insulator Transition in Hematite from Dynamical Mean-Field Theory. Physical Review Letters 102, 146402 (2009).

26. McCarley, R. & Brown, T. The preparation and reactions of some tngsten(II) and tungsten(IV) halides. Inorg. Chem. 3, 1232–1236 (1964).

27. Sorantin, P. I., Schwartz, K., Sorantin, P. I. & Schwartz, K. Inorg. Chem. 31, 567 (1992).

28. Korotin, M., Anisimov, V., Khomskii, D. & Sawatzky, G. CrO$_2$: A Self-Doped Double Exchange Ferromagnet. Physical Review Letters 80, 4305 (1998).

29. Kim, S., Kim, K., Kang, C.-J. & Min, B. I. Pressure-induced phonon softenings and the structural and magnetic transitions in CrO_{2}. Physical Review B 85, 094106 (2012).

30. Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 21, 395502 (2009).

31. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).

32. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).

## Acknowledgements

S.S. is grateful to D. Khomskii for various stimulating discussions about orbital-selective behaviour in low dimensional systems. The present work was supported by the grant of the Russian Scientific Foundation (project no. 14-22-00004).

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

S.V.S. conceived the model and wrote the manuscript. D.M.K. performed the ab initio calculations. S.V.S. and V.I.A. analyzed the results.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Korotin, D., Anisimov, V. & Streltsov, S. Pressure-induced magnetic transitions with change of the orbital configuration in dimerised systems. Sci Rep 6, 25831 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25831

• Accepted:

• Published: