Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Radiation Resistant Vanadium-Graphene Nanolayered Composite

Abstract

Ultra high strength V-graphene nanolayers were developed for the first time that was demonstrated to have an excellent radiation tolerance as revealed by the He+ irradiation study. Radiation induced hardening, evaluated via nanopillar compressions before and after He+ irradiation, is significantly reduced with the inclusion of graphene layers; the flow stresses of V-graphene nanolayers with 110 nm repeat layer spacing showed an increase of 25% while pure V showed an increase of 88% after He+ dosage of 13.5 dpa. The molecular dynamics simulations confirmed that the graphene interface can spontaneously absorb the nearby crystalline defects that are produced from a collision cascade, thereby enhancing the lifetime of the V-graphene nanolayers via this self-healing effect. In addition, the impermeability of He gas through the graphene resulted in suppression of He bubble agglomerations that in turn reduced embrittlement. In-situ SEM compression also showed the ability of graphene to hinder crack propagation that suppressed the failure.

Introduction

Advanced structural material for next generation nuclear facilities require enhanced radiation resistance under harsh irradiation environments to ensure an extended lifetime and therefore the safety of nuclear energy systems1. For example, structural materials for fusion and fission reactors need to withstand the damage arising from a high radiation dose of ~100 dpa2,3 while also maintaining its high strength at elevated temperatures. Vacancies, interstitials, Frenkel defects, vacancy clusters or voids are examples of crystalline defects that are produced as a result of displacement cascade under high-energy neutron radiation environments4,5. In addition, He gas is a transmutation product of the neutron irradiation process6, but the low solubility of He results in precipitation and growth of He bubbles7. Accrual of such defects can lead to radiation induced mechanical hardening and embrittlement that can cause intergranular failure of the structural material. Hence, development of new material with enhanced radiation tolerance that can retain its mechanical properties under harsh conditions put forth by the nuclear reactors is of critical importance.

Current approaches in enhancing the radiation tolerance include selection of material with reduced scattering cross-section for reduced swelling and engineering of its microstructure to reduce the radiation induced crystalline defects. There are limited metal choices available for nuclear structural applications, and steel is the most widely used material in nuclear facilities. Ni-based alloys are used in applications requiring stability at high temperatures, while Vanadium (V)-based alloys are known to have lower neutron cross section, and reduced radiation induced swelling, and moderate high temperature strength8,9,10,11,12. Although only limited choices are available for the metal selection, further engineering of its microstructure can significantly enhance the radiation resistance. For example, it is widely accepted that grain boundaries and interfaces can act as sinks for the radiation induced crystalline defects that are produced from displacement cascade under high energy irradiation13. Therefore, inclusion of high density of either homogeneous interfaces (i.e. grain boundary) or heterogeneous (secondary phases) can significantly enhance the radiation tolerance and has been actively researched over the last few decades. One example of using both homogeneous and heterogeneous interfaces in bulk alloys is polycrystalline ferritic/martensitic (F/M) steels with oxide-dispersions (ODS), which is regarded as an effective nuclear structural material due to the ability to absorb crystalline defects at the grain boundaries (i.e. small grain sizes) as well as the interfaces formed with the oxide phases that are acting as sinks for radiation induced crystalline defects14,15,16,17.

A particularly interesting class of material with enhanced radiation resistance is the metallic nanolayered composite that has been reported to have ultra-high strength18,19,20,21 and radiation resistance22,23,24 due to the extremely high density of heterophase interfaces when the repeat layer spacing is reduced down to the nanoscale. The strengthening mechanism in nanolayered structure is due to the effective constraint of the dislocation movements by the high density of interfaces25,26. The well-known Hall-Petch effect27 governs the strengthening mechanism in metallic nanolayered composites with repeat layer spacing down to few tens of nanometers, where . Here, is the yield strength and h is the repeat layer thickness. In addition, atomic-scale simulations using embedded atom (EAM) potentials of Cu-Nb nanolayered composite have shown that the point defects that are produced from a displacement cascade can be spontaneously absorbed or self-healed by the interfaces of Cu-Nb nanolayers that resulted in lower defect density in comparison to that of pure Cu or Nb24,28,29,30. In another study by Fu et al.22,23, the helium bubble aggregations were suppressed by the interfaces in Cu-V nanolayers, and the magnitude of radiation hardening and swelling was confirmed to be significantly lower in Cu-V nanolayers as the repeat layer spacing is reduced from 50 nm to 2.5 nm.

In our previous work, we reported that graphene with its 2D geometry, outstanding mechanical properties of 130 GPa in strength and Young’s modulus of 1 TPa can be an effective strength enhancer when incorporated in the form of metal-graphene nanolayered composite31,32. The strength of Ni-graphene nanolyered composite with 100 nm repeat layer spacing was 4.0 GPa, which is over 50% of the theoretical strength of Ni. Graphene is also expected to be excellent in enhancing the radiation resistance since graphene is impermeable to all standard gases, including He gas and failure due to He bubble agglomerations in the metals could be prevented33,34,35. In addition, the metal-graphene interface can potentially have self-healing ability to absorb the point defects that are produced during high energy radiation environments. In this work, we developed radiation resistant V-graphene nanolayered composite for the first time, and analyzed its self-healing and He bubble suppression capabilities by using nanopillar compression tests before and after the He+ irradiation. To further understand the deformation mechanism of V-graphene nanolayers after ion irradiation, in-situ SEM nanopillar compression testing, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) microstructure analysis of the irradiated specimens, and molecular dynamics simulations were performed to understand the enhanced radiation resistance.

Results

Strengthening effect in V-graphene nanolayers

V-graphene nanolayers with 110 nm and 300 nm repeat layer spacings as well as pure V thin film were prepared as outlined in the schematic in Fig. 1a. Nanopillars were synthesized from pure V, V-graphene nanolayers and tested in compression as shown in Fig. 1b. The stress-strain response is indicative of a clear strength enhancement with the inclusion of graphene layers, and the strength is increased further for finer repeat layer spacings. Pure V and V-graphene nanolayers with 300 nm and 110 nm repeat layer spacings showed an average flow stress at 5% plastic strain of 2.5 GPa, 3.1 GPa, and 4.8 GPa, respectively. The strengthening effect of a single atomic layer thickness graphene was previously reported to be due to effective constraint on the dislocation motion across the interface31. Similar strengthening effect is expected to be responsible for those V-graphene nanolayers, although the V-graphene may have further contributions arising from smaller grain sizes in comparison to the previously reported Cu, Ni-graphene nanolayers.

Figure 1
figure1

(a) Schematic for pure V and V-graphene nanolayers with repeat layer spacing (λ) of 110 nm and 300 nm. (b) Stress-strain curve determined from nanopillar compression testing of pure V, and V-graphene nanolayers with 110 nm and 300 nm repeated layer spacings. (c) TEM image showing the nanocrystalline nature of V-graphene with 300 nm repeated layer spacing. (d) SRIM ion trajectories of He+ irradiation on V thin film under condition of 120 keV. (e) TEM image showing the radiation induced grain growth after He+ irradiation.

The synthesized V-graphene nanolayers with 300 nm repeat layer spacing were analyzed for the initial microstructure using the TEM. Both the micrograph and the selected area diffraction (SAD) shown in Fig. 1c indicate that the V layers have grain size in the range of tens of nanometers, which was significantly smaller than the grain sizes of Cu or Ni-graphene nanolayers reported previously31. The smaller grain size may be due to higher melting point and therefore lowers diffusivity of V which hinders growth of larger grains during sputtering36. The V layers had columnar grain structure with preferable out-of-plane texture of (111), but the layers were crystallographically mismatched in-plane due to the presence of the graphene. The resulting microstructure of nanocrystalline grains with the presence of planar graphene interfaces is expected to be highly efficient in absorbing crystalline defects that are generated during the radiation process. Since the graphene layer is transferred onto V thin film at room temperature, the vanadium carbide (VC) did not form as evidenced by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data shown in the Supplementary Information Fig. S1.

Radiation tolerance of V-graphene nanolayers

To analyze the radiation tolerance of V-graphene nanolayers, He+ implantation at 120 KeV was used to irradiate pure V, and V-graphene with different repeat layer spacings. The irradiation condition was simulated using Stopping Range of Ions in Material (SRIM)37 assuming that the specimen was pure V (see Fig. 1d), and the calculations indicate that He+ ions have sufficient energy to reach down close to the substrate interface (with the penetration depth of ~600 nm on vanadium thin film), thereby fully irradiating the V layers that are to be tested for mechanical properties. The irradiated specimens were analyzed for the presence of crystalline defects and any changes in the microstructure, and detailed cross-sectional TEM image with its SAD patterns with irradiated V-graphene nanolayers with 300 nm repeat layer spacing are shown in Fig. 1e. Voids are observed along the graphene interface and at the grain boundaries, and the damage is more pronounced in the top V layer than in the V layer below the graphene interface. In addition, the SAD pattern from after irradiation indicates that the radiation induced grain growth is more observable, where discrete diffraction spots start to appear from the previously recorded diffraction ring. The cause for such radiation induced grain growth is well documented, where the grain boundary migration occurs by irradiation induced thermal spike38,39. Although such radiation induced grain growth can reduce the embrittlement by the He concentration at grain boundaries, the observation of such phenomena is already indicative of heavy damage being present in the irradiated metal.

In the presence of radiation induced defects and He bubble formations, metals can become harder and more brittle, as known as radiation induced hardening. The He+ irradiated pure V and V-graphene nanopillars were then evaluated for radiation induced hardening by comparing the nanopillar compression results before and after the irradiation as shown in Fig. 2a,c. The irradiated samples commonly showed an increase in strength and more pronounced brittle failure in comparison to the non-irradiated specimens. For the case of pure V, irradiation nanopillar resulted in significant hardening and brittle failure presumably due to formation of crystalline point defects that can agglomerate to form voids, which agrees favorably with previous report from Masahiro et al. for the case of bulk V upon irradiation40. According to the Masahiro et al., the He doped bulk V showed hardening of up to twice the original strength and the corresponding brittle failure was reported, where the ductility was reduced from 26% to 4%. For the case of V-graphene nanolayers, however, a significantly smaller degree of embrittlement and radiation induced hardening was observed with the inclusion of graphene, especially with smaller repeat layer spacings or higher density of graphene layers. The radiation induced hardening resulted in increase in flow stress at 5% plastic strain from 4.8 GPa to 6 GPa (25% increase) for the V-graphene with 110 nm repeat layer spacing, from 3.1 GPa to 5.0 GPa (61% increase) for the V-graphene with 300 nm, and from 2.5 GPa to 4.8 GPa (88% increase) for the case of pure V.

Figure 2: Nanopillar compression tests before and after He+ irradiation.
figure2

Stress-strain curves for (a) pure V, V-graphene with repeat layer spacing of (b) 300 nm, (c) 110 nm. SEM images of nanopillars after compression testing for He+ irradiated (d) pure V, and (e) V-graphene with 110 nm repeat layer spacing indicating that the crack propagation was suppressed by the graphene interface. Full in-situ SEM compression movie for irradiated V-graphene with 110 nm repeat layer spacing is available at Supplementary Movie 1.

In-situ SEM nanopillar compression tests were performed for direct observations of the deformation process for irradiated pure V and V-graphene nanolayers with 110 nm repeat layer spacing. For the case of irradiated pure V, brittle failure was observed at 20% strain as shown in Fig. 2d. In contrast, the V-graphene with 110 nm repeat layer spacing also started with a crack initiation at the top most V layer, but the crack did not propagate to the lower V layer as shown in Fig. 2e and in the Supplementary Movie 1. The crack growth was hindered by the graphene interface, and thereby suppressing the brittle failure that resulted in the V-graphene nanopillar being able to withstand strain of up to 20% without failure.

Discussion

Suppression of He bubbles at the graphene interface

As outlined above, He bubble formations are of concern in maintaining the mechanical stability in nuclear structural materials. He is known to rapidly combine with vacancy clusters to form bubbles that can migrate and agglomerate to result in intergranular failure by embrittlement and crck formation41,42,43. However, atomistic simulations on Cu-Nb nanolayers showed that the interfaces can act as sinks for high concentrations of vacancies due to the lower formation energies of vacancies at the Cu-Nb interfaces that can lead to lower density of He bubbles in Cu-Nb nanolayers in comparison to that in bulk Cu or Nb29,44,45,46. The V-graphene nanolayers are expected to also be excellent at terminating He gas migration in comparison to the nanolayers composed of only metal layers due to the impermeability of the He gas through the graphene layer35. Cross-section TEM images of V-graphene with 300 nm repeat layer spacing was taken at different locations as marked in Fig. 3 using 400 nm under-focus condition. He bubbles were observed at the top V surface region as shown in Fig. 3b, but most He bubbles were concentrated at the graphene interface that are shown as white dots in Fig. 3c. The graphene interface hindered the He bubbles from migrating and agglomerating to larger sizes, which can potentially penetrate through thickness of the layers to result in blister. It should be noted again that the chosen irradiation energy is sufficient for He ions to have penetrated through thickness of the nanolayers, but the graphene interface has effectively stopped migration of He bubbles.

Figure 3
figure3

(a) TEM analysis of the V-graphene nanolayer after He+ irradiation at 120 keV for V-graphene with 300 nm repeat layer. High magnification images are taken using 400 nm under-focus condition at (b) the top layer, (c) the graphene interface, and (d) the bottom layer. White dots are indicative of He bubbles, which are concentrated near the graphene interface shown in (c).

Role of graphene in reducing radiation induced hardening

The increase in yield strength after He implantation is commonly accepted to be due to the formation of radiation induced crystalline defects as well as He bubbles22,23,24,47,48. Our results indicate that the flow stress at 5% strain for V-graphene with 300 nm and 110 nm repeat layer spacing exposed to He+ irradiation were increased by 40% and 25%, respectively while pure V after irradiation resulted in increase in flow stress of 88%. Significant reduction in radiation hardening in V-graphene nanolayers is expected to be due to reduction in He bubble formation, as well as the ability of the V-graphene interface to absorb the crystalline defects. The total radiation hardening can be expressed as

where is the radiation induced hardening in the presence of He bubbles and is from other crystalline defects. Each of these contributions is individually considered for the case of V-graphene nanolayers.

Radiation induced hardening due to presence of He bubbles ( can be calculated from Friedel–Kroupa–Hirsch (FKH) model for weak obstacles49,50, where the increase in yield strength is given by

where M is Taylor factor, is the shear modulus, b is the Burgers vector, d is bubble diameter and N is bubble density. For the measured He bubble size from TEM images for V-graphene with 110 nm repeat layer spacing, the radiation induced hardening is calculated to be 260 MPa for typical values of M, , b for V metal. The calculated value is smaller than that of the experimentally measured radiation induced hardening of 1200 MPa. Therefore, is calculated to 940 MPa, which can be attributed to radiation induced hardening from other crystalline defects that are introduced from collision cascade. Orowan’s model can now be used to determine the approximate length scale for the existing pinning points within the V matrix.

where is the barrier strength, is average spacing between obstacles then given by = 10.1 nm. Similar calculations of for V-graphene with 300 nm repeat layer spacing and pure V are 7.6 nm and 4.8 nm, respectively. This analysis indicates that the length scale for separation distance between the crystalline defects is the largest for the case with V-graphene with 110 nm spacing, which is indicative of the V-graphene interface effectively absorbing the crystalline defects from the V matrix to minimize radiation induced hardening. In the work by Zhang et al., radiation induced hardening variation of Cu-V with 100 nm spacing under total ion fluence 6 × 1020 ions/m2 was reported to be 0.7 GPa, which again confirms that our V-graphene with 100 nm spacing is significantly more efficient with radiation induced hardening of 1.2 GPa under higher total ion fluence of 1 × 1022 ions/m2.

Molecular dynamics simulations: Analysis

The role of graphene in enhancing the radiation tolerance was investigated by employing molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on a model system of pure V and V-graphene nanolayers. We model the radiation event as a collision of a primary knock-on atom (PKA) with 2 keV (See Fig. 4a). Because the interaction between V and graphene is van der Waal’s type, there are no preexisting defects or misfit dislocations at the interface. The detailed interface structure and defect-interface characteristics before the collision is available in the Supplementary Information Note 3, 4. After the initial explosive collision cascade event, numerous vacancy and interstitial pairs are created. For the body-centered cubic (bcc) crystal such as V, a special type of delocalized mobile interstitial, called crowdion, is formed which can move along the [111] direction quickly without large thermal activation. Crowdions can be recognized as small chains of 3-4 high energy atoms in the Fig. 4c and the Supplementary Movie 2 and 3. The MD simulation results indicate that the radiation induced of V-graphene nanolayers is less severe than that of pure V since the number of remaining point defects from the collision cascade becomes significantly smaller in the presence of graphene layers, as compared in Fig. 4.

Figure 4: Molecular dynamics simulations of the knock-on event.
figure4

(a) Schematic of simulation. (b) Damage on graphene after the knock-on event. The damage on graphene reduces as the distance to PKA increases because large portion of the energy is released by the vacancy-interstitial formation as well as local heating in lattice. (c) The collision cascade after the knock-on event for d = 15 . The amount of cascade is significantly reduced by the graphene layer. Significantly more defects remain in the pure V. Atoms with high potential energy (above −4.4 eV) are visualized selectively. (d) The formation energies of vacancies are significantly lower at the graphene interface than in the bulk lattice of V. The migrated vacancies can then be annihilated with the crowdions to result in self-healing of radiation induced defects.

One of the main reasons for the reduction in crystalline defects in the presence of the graphene interface is due to the reduction in the vacancy-interstitial formation. The knock-on energy from the collision cascade is typically relaxed through local heating of the crystal lattice as well as by forming vacancy-interstitial pairs, but a large portion of the energy in the case of V-graphene nanolayers is consumed to break the covalent bonds in graphene due to the high atomization energy (7.4 eV) of the graphene. Thus, significant damage of graphene is observed when the knock-on event occurs close to graphene layers (see Fig. 4b), and this results in reduction of the size of the collision cascade in comparison to that in pure V.

Second reason for less defect formations is due to the V-graphene interface acting as an efficient sink for the interstitial defects or crowdions. Crowdions move along the [111] directions until they encounter the V-graphene interface, and form adatoms between the graphene and V. Vacancies also diffuse to the V-graphene interface and the arrived vacancies are then trapped at the interface because the vacancy formation energy is smaller at the graphene interface (1.2 eV) than in the bulk lattice (2.5 eV) (see Fig. 4d). The vacancy migration mechanism due to its lower formation energy at the interface was also observed in the atomistic modeling of Cu/Nb interface by Misra et al.24. Using the Fick’s first law, one can estimate the time scale (t) for the vacancy to arrive at the interface as

where is diffusion distance assumed to be half of the layer spacing (300 nm → 150 nm, 110 nm → 55 nm) and D is the vacancy diffusion coefficient, is Debye frequency of 1013Hz, is vacancy jump energy barrier calculated from nudged elestic band calculations51 as 0.187 eV, is Boltzmann constant and T is absolute temperature. The timescales for the vacancy to arrive at the graphene interface for V-graphene with 110 nm and 300 nm repeated layer spacings are 3.27 × 104 s and 2.43 × 105 s, respectively, at room temperature. However, during the ion irradiation testing and FIB processing to fabricate pillars for compression testing, the actual temperature can increase up to ~200 °C that could then enable vacancies to reach the interface in just a 0.26 seconds for V-graphene with 110 nm repeated layer spacing. Therefore it is expected that the interstitials in the form of crowdion and vacancies gathered at the interface to annihilate near the graphene interfaces. Higher density of the V-graphene interfaces (i.e. small repeat layer spacings) results in more effective annihilation of interstitials and vacancies, thereby increasing the self-healing ability of the nanolayers. Our analysis is consistent with the experimental observation in which the V-graphene with 110 nm repeat layer spacing showed significantly smaller radiation induced hardening than in 300 nm repeat layer spacing specimen. The self-healing ability as confirmed from MD simulations is expected to be one of the major causes for enhanced radiation tolerance in V-graphene nanolayers, while suppression of He bubbles at the graphene interface also suppress the brittle failure.

Summary

In this study, we developed and analyzed the radiation resistance V-graphene nanolayered composites with varying repeat layer spacings of 110 nm, 300 nm and compared the results to those of pure V. He+ irradiation with dosage of 13.5 dpa revealed that the V-graphene nanolayers had reduced formations of radiation induced crystalline defects compared with pure V, which agreed with the nanopillar compression results of irradiated specimen V-graphene showing reduction in radiation induced hardening and suppression of brittle failure. In-situ SEM compression tests showed that the graphene interface can hinder the crack propagation thus helping to suppress the brittle failure. The structural material degradation due to He bubble formations was shown to be significantly reduced in V-graphene nanolayers due to the impermeability of He through the graphene layer that prevents agglomeration of He gas into large bubbles. Orowan’s model was then used to determine the approximate length scale for the pinning points from the presence of radiation induced defects that indicated less accrual of defects in the V-graphene layers. Finally, MD simulations confirmed that the cause for less crystalline defects in V-graphene layers is due to the graphene interface being able to absorb the crystalline defects that are introduced from collision cascade. Therefore, inclusion of graphene in the form of V-graphene nanolayers can not only result in initially high strength material, but the graphene can self-heal the crystalline defects that are introduced during irradiation as well as terminating migration of He bubbles to result in extremely radiation resistance material.

Methods

Synthesis of V-graphene nanolayers

The Si/SiO2 (625 μm/300 nm) substrate was chosen for deposition of the V-graphene nanolayers. Vanadium nanolayers were first deposited using radio frequency (RF) sputtering under vacuum at 5 × 10−6 Torr with Ar gas of 5 mTorr at 10 sccm, and RF power of 200 W was used. After deposition of the V layer, graphene was fabricated by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and then transferred on to Si/SiO2/V substrate. By repeating the above steps, nanocrystalline V-graphene nanolayers composites were synthesized with 110 nm and 300 nm repeat layer spacings, while keeping the total thickness to be the same at ~600 nm.

Nanopillar compression testing

To test the mechanical properties of the V-graphene nanolayers composites, the Quanta 3D FEG Focused ion beam (FIB) milling was utilized to fabricate V-graphene nanopillars with diameter of 250 nm and height of 600 nm. The pillar compression tests were performed by the Hysitron Tbi-750 (Minneapolis, MN) nanoindentation system with a 10 μm diameter flat-ended cube corner tip. All pillars were compressed over 15% total strain in a displacement control feedback mode (DC mode) using the Hysitron quasi-static indentation transducer with nominal engineering strain rate of 0.002 s−1. The load-displacement data from compression test were analyzed with the conventional constant volume and homogeneous deformation assumption model to calculate the true stress-true strain curves52. In-situ SEM nanopillar compression tests were also conducted to confirm the deformation behavior of the nanopillars using a Hysitron Picoindenter (PI-95) in a Quanta 3D FEG FIB. Same sized nanopillars were compressed under in-situ SEM at a nominal constant strain rate of 0.002 s−1.

He+ irradiation

To evaluate the radiation resistance of V-graphene nanolayers, He+ ion irradiation was performed at Kyungjoo Korea Multi-Purpose Accelerator Complex (KAERI) facility at 120 keV with beam current of 1.2 mA and dosage of 1 × 1018/cm2 at room temperature. The SRIM calculations indicate (state the simulation conditions and assumptions) that this irradiation condition is sufficient to reach through thickness of the V layers down close to the substrate interface. The benefits of ion irradiation in probing the radiation resistance of materials rather than using neutron irradiations were previously reported in the work by Kiener et al.53.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Kim, Y. et al. Radiation Resistant Vanadium-Graphene Nanolayered Composite. Sci. Rep. 6, 24785; doi: 10.1038/srep24785 (2016).

References

  1. 1

    Murty, K. & Charit, I. Structural materials for Gen-IV nuclear reactors: Challenges and opportunities. J. Nucl. Mater. 383, 189–195 (2008).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Bloom, E. Structural materials for fusion reactors. Nuclear Fusion 30, 1879 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Zinkle, S. J. & Busby, J. T. Structural materials for fission & fusion energy. Mater. Today 12, 12–19 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Farrell, K., Mahmood, S., Stoller, R. & Mansur, L. An evaluation of low temperature radiation embrittlement mechanisms in ferritic alloys. J. Nucl. Mater. 210, 268–281 (1994).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Yamamoto, T., Odette, G. R., Miao, P., Edwards, D. J. & Kurtz, R. J. Helium effects on microstructural evolution in tempered martensitic steels: In situ helium implanter studies in HFIR. Journal of Nuclear Materials 386, 338–341 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Trinkaus, H. & Singh, B. Helium accumulation in metals during irradiation–where do we stand? J. Nucl. Mater. 323, 229–242 (2003).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Lucas, A. Helium in metals. Physica B + C 127, 225–239 (1984).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Gold, R. & Bajaj, R. Mechanical properties of candidate vanadium alloys for fusion applications. J. Nucl. Mater. 122, 759–766 (1984).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Smith, D., Chung, H., Matsui, H. & Rowcliffe, A. Progress in vanadium alloy development for fusion applications. Fus. Eng. Des. 41, 7–14 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Dyomina, E., Fenici, P., Kolotov, V. & Zucchetti, M. Low-activation characteristics of V-alloys and SiC composites. J. Nucl. Mater. 258, 1784–1790 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Nagasaka, T. et al. Development of fabrication technology for low activation vanadium alloys as fusion blanket structural materials. Nucl. Fus. 46, 618 (2006).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Shyrokov, V., Vasyliv, C. B. & Shyrokov, O. Ways of improving the high-temperature work service of vanadium and some alloys used in reactors. J. Nucl. Mater. 394, 114–122 (2009).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Bai, X.-M., Voter, A. F., Hoagland, R. G., Nastasi, M. & Uberuaga, B. P. Efficient annealing of radiation damage near grain boundaries via interstitial emission. Science 327, 1631–1634 (2010).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Miller, M., Hoelzer, D., Kenik, E. & Russell, K. Stability of ferritic MA/ODS alloys at high temperatures. Intermetallics 13, 387–392 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Ukai, S. & Fujiwara, M. Perspective of ODS alloys application in nuclear environments. J. Nucl. Mater. 307, 749–757 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Certain, A., Kuchibhatla, S., Shutthanandan, V., Hoelzer, D. & Allen, T. Radiation stability of nanoclusters in nano-structured oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) steels. J. Nucl. Mater. 434, 311–321 (2013).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Singh, B. N. Effect of grain size on void formation during high-energy electron irradiation of austenitic stainless steel. Philo. Mag. 29, 25–42 (1974).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Han, S. M., Phillips, M. A. & Nix, W. D. Study of strain softening behavior of Al–Al 3 Sc multilayers using microcompression testing. Acta Mater. 57, 4473–4490 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Wang, J., Hoagland, R., Hirth, J. & Misra, A. Atomistic modeling of the interaction of glide dislocations with “weak” interfaces. Acta Mater. 56, 5685–5693 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Wang, J., Hoagland, R. G. & Misra, A. Mechanics of nanoscale metallic multilayers: From atomic-scale to micro-scale. Scr. Mater. 60, 1067–1072 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Phillips, M., Clemens, B. & Nix, W. A model for dislocation behavior during deformation of Al/Al 3 Sc (fcc/L1 2) metallic multilayers. Acta Mater. 51, 3157–3170 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Fu, E. et al. Size dependent enhancement of helium ion irradiation tolerance in sputtered Cu/V nanolaminates. J. Nucl. Mater. 385, 629–632 (2009).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Fu, E., Misra, A., Wang, H., Shao, L. & Zhang, X. Interface enabled defects reduction in helium ion irradiated Cu/V nanolayers. J. Nucl. Mater. 407, 178–188 (2010).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Misra, A., Demkowicz, M., Zhang, X. & Hoagland, R. The radiation damage tolerance of ultra-high strength nanolayered composites. Jom 59, 62–65 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Budiman, A. S. et al. Plasticity in the nanoscale Cu/Nb single-crystal multilayers as revealed by synchrotron Laue x-ray microdiffraction. J. Mater. Res. 27, 599–611 (2012).

  26. 26

    Wang, J. & Misra, A. An overview of interface-dominated deformation mechanisms in metallic multilayers. Cur. Opin. Sol. Sta.Mater. Sci. 15, 20–28 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Nieh, T. & Wadsworth, J. Hall-Petch relation in nanocrystalline solids. Scr. Mater. 25, 955–958 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Kim, Y. et al. Microcompression study of Al-Nb nanoscale multilayers. J. Mater. Res. 27, 592–598 (2012).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Demkowicz, M., Hoagland, R. & Hirth, J. Interface structure and radiation damage resistance in Cu-Nb multilayer nanocomposites. Phy. Rev. Lett. 100, 136102 (2008).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Wang, J., Hoagland, R., Hirth, J. & Misra, A. Atomistic simulations of the shear strength and sliding mechanisms of copper–niobium interfaces. Acta Mater. 56, 3109–3119 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Kim, Y. et al. Strengthening effect of single-atomic-layer graphene in metal–graphene nanolayered composites. Nat. Com. 4, 2114 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Hwang, J. et al. Enhanced Mechanical Properties of Graphene/Copper Nanocomposites Using a Molecular‐Level Mixing Process. Adv. Mater. 25, 6724–6729 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Blewer, R. & Langley, R. Depth distribution and migration of helium in vanadium at elevated temperatures. J. Nucl. Mater. 63, 337–346 (1976).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Jäger, W., Lässer, R., Schober, T. & Thomas, G. Formation of helium bubbles and dislocation loops in tritium-charged vanadium. Radi. Eff. 78, 165–176 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Bunch, J. S. et al. Impermeable atomic membranes from graphene sheets. Nano lett. 8, 2458–2462 (2008).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Hentzell, H., Grovenor, C. & Smith, D. Grain structure variation with temperature for evaporated metal films. J. Vacu. Sci.Tech. A. 2, 218–219 (1984).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Jenkins, M. L. & Kirk, M. A. Characterisation of radiation damage by transmission electron microscopy. (CRC Press, 2000).

  38. 38

    Kaoumi, D., Motta, A. & Birtcher, R. A thermal spike model of grain growth under irradiation. J. Appl. Phy. 104, 073525 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Zhang, Y. et al. Grain growth and phase stability of nanocrystalline cubic zirconia under ion irradiation. Phy. Rev. B. 82, 184105 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Tanaka, M. & Matsui, H. Effects of implanted helium on the mechanical properties of vanadium-based binary alloys. Mater. Trans. JIM 34, 1083–1089 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Singh, B. N. & Foreman, A. Calculated grain size-dependent vacancy supersaturation and its effect on void formation. Philo. Maga. 29, 847–858 (1974).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Bullough, R., Hayns, M. & Wood, M. Sink strengths for thin film surfaces and grain boundaries. J. Nucl. Mater. 90, 44–59 (1980).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Bruemmer, S. M. et al. Radiation-induced material changes and susceptibility to intergranular failure of light-water-reactor core internals. J. Nucl. Mater. 274, 299–314 (1999).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Kashinath, A., Misra, A. & Demkowicz, M. Stable storage of helium in nanoscale platelets at semicoherent interfaces. Phy. Revi. Lett. 110, 086101 (2013).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Li, N., Nastasi, M. & Misra, A. Defect structures and hardening mechanisms in high dose helium ion implanted Cu and Cu/Nb multilayer thin films. Inter. J. Plast. 32, 1–16 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Demkowicz, M., Bellon, P. & Wirth, B. Atomic-scale design of radiation-tolerant nanocomposites. MRS bulletin 35, 992–998 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Zhang, X., Fu, E., Misra, A. & Demkowicz, M. Interface-enabled defect reduction in He ion irradiated metallic multilayers. JOM J. Miner. Met. Mater. Soc. 62, 75–78 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Li, N. et al. He ion irradiation damage in Al/Nb multilayers. J. App. Phy. 105, 123522 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Kroupa, F. & Hirsch, P. Elastic interaction between prismatic dislocation loops and straight dislocations. Discus. Fara. Soc. 38, 49–55 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Friedel, J. Dislocations Pergamon. New York (1964).

  51. 51

    Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Greer, J. R., Oliver, W. C. & Nix, W. D. Size dependence of mechanical properties of gold at the micron scale in the absence of strain gradients. Acta Mater. 53, 1821–1830 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Kiener, D., Hosemann, P., Maloy, S. & Minor, A. In situ nanocompression testing of irradiated copper. Nat. Mater. 10, 608–613 (2011).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Samsung Research Funding Center of Samsung Electronics under Project Number SRFC-MA1501-02 and EEWS Initiative at KAIST. S. Ryu would also like to thank the Basic Science Research Program (2013R1A1A1010091) of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.K. performed the ex-situ/in-situ SEM mechanical testing, TEM analysis, ion irradiation testing, and prepared the manuscript. J.B. and S.J. synthesized the samples. S.K. and S.R. performed and analyzed the MD simulations. S.M.K. and all authors contributed to the discussions and edited the manuscript. S.M.H. designed and supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Min Han.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, Y., Baek, J., Kim, S. et al. Radiation Resistant Vanadium-Graphene Nanolayered Composite. Sci Rep 6, 24785 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24785

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing