Article | Open | Published:

Next-generation Sequencing Extends the Phenotypic Spectrum for LCA5 Mutations: Novel LCA5 Mutations in Cone Dystrophy

Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 24357 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

We aim to characterize the clinical features and genetic causes for two affected siblings from a Chinese family with cone dystrophy (CD). Two patients and four unaffected family members were recruited and received complete ophthalmic examinations. Genomic DNA was isolated from the peripheral blood samples from all patients. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach followed by intrafamilal cosegregation and in silico analyses were employed to determine the genetic defects. Ophthalmic evaluations finalized the clinical diagnosis of CD for the two patients in this family, both of whom presented macular atrophy with no remarkable changes in the peripheral retina. Comprehensive genetic screening approach revealed biallelic missense mutations in the Leber congenital amaurosis 5 (LCA5) gene, p.[Ala212Pro];[Tyr441Cys], as disease causative for this family. Both mutations were novel. The first substitution was predicted to eliminate a hydrogen bond and alter the tertiary structure of lebercilin, protein encoded by LCA5. We for the first time report novel biallelic LCA5 mutations in causing CD. Our study extends the phenotypic and genotypic spectrums for LCA5-associated retinopathies and better illustrates its genotype-phenotype correlations, which would help with better genetic diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized treatment for CD patients.

Introduction

Mutations in the Leber congenital amaurosis 5 (LCA5) gene (MIM 611408) are reported to cause one to two percent of patients with Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA). LCA is the most severe form of inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs). Its typical features include blindness or severe visual impairments within the first year of life, congenital nystagmus, sluggish or absent pupillary responses, photophobia, and high hyperopia1,2. Since its first identification by den Hollander in 2007, LCA5 mutations have been widely reported as LCA causative in multiple ethnic groups3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Recent studies also indicate the disease causing roles of LCA5 mutations in two Asian families with early-onset retinal dystrophy (EORD) and a Spanish family with retinitis pigmentosa (RP)12,13. Patients from the two families with EORD showed dystrophy and pigmentation in the peripheral retina with their fovea spared and central vision preserved, while patients from the RP family showed very poor central vision with remarkable intrafamilal phenotypic diversity.

LCA5, mapped to chromosome 6q14.1, contains 9 exons and encodes lebercilin, a widely expressed ciliary protein with high evolutionary conservation3,13. Despite the ubiquitous expression of lebercilin, lebercilin defects only cause retinal dystrophies, suggesting its important role in keeping regular retinal functions. Herein, according to a comprehensive genetic screening approach, we describe two novel LCA5 mutations in a previously unreported correlation with cone dystrophy (CD) in two affected siblings from a Chinese family with autosomal recessive inheritance pattern.

Results

Clinical Manifestations

Two patients, two unaffected siblings and their asymptomatic parents were included in the present study with their family pedigree presented in Fig. 1A and clinical details summarized in Table 1. The 13-year-old proband, YZ-II:4, noticed a decrease in her vision since infancy. Her 30-year-old elder sister YZ-II:1 reported similar onset age and visual symptoms. The other two siblings and their parents denied similar visual issues. No family history of visual problems was recorded. Both patients presented dyschromatopsia since early childhood. The proband also noticed rapid deterioration of central vision. The best corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) dropped from 20/40 at age 6, when she was first diagnosed of CD, to 20/100 within one year, to 20/200 at age 10 and remained stable since then. Similar visual symptoms were reported by her elder sister, who suffered from rapid drop in central vision in her early 10 s and the disease became stable since her mid-10 s. Nyctalopia was not reported and no remarkable changes were revealed in the anterior segment by the slit-lamp examination. Funduscopy indicated retinal atrophy restricted to the macular region with fovea involved for both patients (Fig. 2A,B,G,H). Healthy vascular arcades and optic disk with no signs of peripheral involvement were revealed in the fundus of both patients. Consistent with the fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) of the proband indicated hypofluorescent central area (Fig. 2C,D). Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) revealed speckled changes of increased fluorescence in the macular region (Fig. 2E,F). Outer nucleus layer (ONL), inner/outer segments (IS/OS), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) are significantly thinned as suggested by optical coherence tomography (OCT) presentations of both patients (Fig. 2K–P). Visual field (VF) tests showed diffused loss of central vision in the proband YZ-II:4 and central scotoma in patient YZ-II:1. Photopic responses were undetectable for both patients as revealed by electroretinography (ERG), while scotopic responses were residual. Pathologic responses were recorded by visual-evoked potentials (VEP) tests for both patients, including low amplitude of P100 wave and enlarged latency (implicit time). In summary, the two patients from family YZ presented similar CD phenotypes.

Figure 1: Mutations identified in family YZ.
Figure 1

(A) Pedigree of family YZ is demonstrated. LCA5 genotypes are shown for each included individual. Proband is pointed out by arrow. Circles indicate females, and squares, males. Filled symbols indicate affected patients, and empty symbols, normal controls. (B) Schematic representation of the relative linear location of the two identified LCA5 mutations in context of genome structure (upper) and protein structure (below). (C) Chromatograms of the wild type and mutant sequences. (D) Orthologous protein sequence alignment of LCA5 from human (H. sapiens), chimpanzees (P. troglodytes), dogs (C. lupus), cattle (B. taurus), pigs (S. scrofa) and rats (M. musculus). Conserved residues are shaded. Mutated residues are boxed and indicated. (E,F) Predicted crystal structural models of the wild type (E) and mutant (p.Ala212Pro, F) lebercilin. Residue 212 was indicated in green and its generated hydrogen bonds pink. Residue Ala212 interacts with residues Ile209 and Arg213, while the hydrogen bond between residue 212 and Ile209 was eliminated due to the substitution from alanine to proline.

Table 1: Clinical Features of Attainable Patients.
Figure 2: Fundus photographs, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings in the two patients and the asymptomatic mother from family YZ.
Figure 2

(A,B) Fundus of patient YZ-II:4 indicates macular atrophy with loss of fovea reflex but no signs of peripheral involvement. (C,D) Oval hypofluorescent area in the maculae of both eyes is shown in the FAF of patient YZ-II:4. (E,F) FFA of patient YZ-II:4 notices speckled changes of increased fluorescence in the macular region of both eyes. (G,H) Similar to patient YZ-II:4, marked macular atrophy with fovea involved was also found in the fundus of both eyes of patient YZ-II:1. (I,J) The color fundus of the asymptomatic mother YZ-I:2. (KP) OCT presentations of patients YZ-II:4 (K,L), YZ-II:1 (M,N), and their mother YZ-I:2 (O,P). The outer nucleus layer (ONL) and inner/outer segments (IS/OS) layers are vanished in the fovea and its surrounding maculae of patients YZ-II:4 and YZ-II:1 with no remarkable changes detected in the peripheral retina. Retinal pigment epithelium layer was significantly thinned in the maculae of patient YZ-II:1 but was slightly changed in patient YZ-II:4. OD = right eye; OS = left eye.

Genetic Findings

Targeted NGS approach, summarized in Supplementary Table S1, was selectively conducted on patient YZ-II:1. Coverage of the targeted region reached 99.89%, and its mean depth achieved 109.72-fold. A total of 2669 variants, including 2354 SNPs and 315 Indels were initially identified for patient YZ-II:1. Only 6 coding variants retained after filtration against the 6 SNP databases (Supplementary Table S2). Intrafamilial cosegregation analysis further confirmed that biallelic missense variants, LCA5 c.[634G>C];[1322A>G], were potential disease causing mutations for the two patients (Fig. 1A). Both variants were novel and absent in 150 negative controls. The first substitution, c.634G>C, would lead to the amino acid change from alanine to proline at residue 212 (p.Ala212Pro) of lebercilin. This variation was reveled in the ExAC database with a very low frequency of 0.00001649. Lebercilin contains four coiled coil regions2. Residue Ala212, located in the 2nd coiled-coil domain of lebercilin, was highly conserved among all tested species (Fig. 1B,E). Crystal structural modeling of the wild type and mutant lebercilin carrying p.Ala212Pro (residues 154 to 323) were constructed based on the crystal structure of the HP0958 protein (Protein data bank [PDB] ID: 3NA7) with the sequence identity of 27.41% and similarity of 0.3314. According to constructed model, the wild type residue Ala212 generated two hydrogen bonds and interacted with two neighboring amino acids, Ile209 and Arg213 (Fig. 1C). The other variation, c.1322A>G, would cause the substitution from tyrosine to cysteine at residue 441 (p.Tyr441Cys), located between the 3rd and 4th coiled-coil regions (Fig. 1B). This variation was revealed in the dbSNP144 database (rs566723830) with the population frequency undescribed. Conservational analysis proved the conservation of residue Tyr441 in multiple species, except for in cattle and rats (Fig. 1E). Taken together, we believe that, rather than polymorphisms, the two identified LAC5 variants were more likely the disease causing mutations for patients in this family.

Discussion

LCA5 mutations have been reported to cause several forms of inherited retinal dystrophies, but have never been found correlated with CD. We, for the first time, report the identification of novel LCA5 mutations in patients with CD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the association between LCA5 mutations and CD, which extends the phenotypic features and genotypic spectrums for LCA5-associated retinopathy.

Lebercilin demonstrates a wide expression pattern. In photoreceptors, lebercilin is uniquely located at the cilium which bridges the IS and OS, interacts with intrafalgellar transport (IFT) machinery, and functions as an integral element for the transport of certain proteins through photoreceptor cilia3,13,15. In vitro study implies that regular interaction between lebercilin and IFT complex proteins will disappear when human LCA causative lebercilin mutations are introduced, thus disrupting the IFT-dependent protein transport in cilia15. In mice models, the inactivation of lebercilin will cause delocalization of opsins and light-induced translocation of arrestin from photoreceptor OS, inhibit the proper formation of photoreceptor OS, and finally lead to photoreceptor degeneration15.

Of note, a total of 34 LCA5 mutations have previously been reported, of which 30 mutations are implicated in the etiology of LCA, 3 in EORD, and one in RP (Supplementary Table S3)3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. For patients from the two families diagnosed with EORD, their retinal phenotypes are characterized by widespread RPE atrophy and peripheral intraretinal pigmentation with fovea and central visions relatively preserved, mimicking RP presentations12. LCA5 mutations have not been reported in causing other forms of retinopathies, especially cone dominant dystrophies. Novel biallelic missense LCA5 mutations, p.[Ala212Pro];[Tyr441Cys], are identified as disease causative for two CD patients in our study, expending the phenotypic spectrums for LCA5 mutations. Both mutations are absent in 150 unrelated healthy controls. The first substitution from alanine to proline at residue 212 is predicted to eliminate a hydrogen bond and thereafter alter the tertiary structure of lebercilin. A similar heterozygous missense change from alanine to serine at the same residue has been previously found in a Chinese patient with LCA9, supporting the clinical heterogeneities for LCA5 mutations. Noteworthy, most reported LCA5 mutations that cause severe LCA phenotypes are nonsense, frameshift, or splicesite variations expected to generate truncated lebercilin or cause nonsense medicated mRNA decay (Supplementary Table S3)16. Homozygous missense LCA5 mutation has only been found in a Spanish sporadic LCA patient12. Taken together, the cone dominant retinal features in this study are not likely to be correlated with the mutation type or ethnic background. The similar retinal phenotypes exhibited by the two siblings prevent the identification of potential genetic modifiers for lebercilin. Further investigations into intrafamilial and interfamilial phenotypic varieties caused by the same or similar LCA5 mutations are warranted to assign the genetic modifier for lebercilin, which would help with better illustrations of the genotype-phenotype correlations for LCA5-associated retinopathies.

In summary, we have identified novel LCA5 mutations in the etiology of CD, which extends the phenotypic and genotypic spectrums for LCA5-associated retinopathies. The clinical diagnosis for a specific type of IRDs may sometimes be challenged by the phenotypic overlaps among different retinal diseases, or in a young patient with lesser full-bloom of clinical manifestations. It is therefore essential for clinicians to use genetic tests to tell the clinical ambiguity and to prognosticate the disease. Genetic diagnosis also premises gene therapy and other forms of treatments. Our study provides novel insights into the etiology of CD, which would help with the genetic diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized treatment for families with CD. However, future research is still warranted to clarify the pathogenic mechanism underlying how LCA5 mutations would cause CD and to develop personalized treatments according to each individual’s genetic makeup.

Methods

Participants and Clinical Assessments

Four siblings, including two patients and two asymptomatic individuals, and their unaffected parents, were recruited from Ningxia People’s Hospital. Written informed consents were obtained from all participants or their legal guardians. Our study, adhered to tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, was approved and prospectively reviewed by the Ethics Committee on Human Research at Ningxia People’s Hospital. Each participant received routine ophthalmic examinations, while the two patients and the unaffected mother underwent complete ophthalmic examinations, including assessments of BCVAs, slit-lamp examination, funduscopy, color vision test, VF tests (Humphrey perimetry), VEP, ERG and OCT examinations. FAF imaging and FFA was selectively conducted on the proband, patient YZ-II:4. Additionally, 150 unrelated healthy controls free of retinal or other major ocular diseases were also included. Peripheral venous blood samples (5 mL) were collected from all included participants for genomic DNA isolation with a QIAmp DNA Mini Blood Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

Targeted NGS Approach

Targeted NGS approach was selectively employed on patient YZ-II:1 for mutation identification using a previously described microarray targeting 180 IRDs causative and 9 candidate genes17,18,19,20. Library preparation, qualification, NGS on the Illumina HiSeq2000 platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), and bioinformatics analysis were performed as detailed previously21. Coverage and sequencing depth were further evaluated. Six SNP databases, including dbSNP137 (http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/hg19/database/snp137.txt.gz.), HapMap Project (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/hapmap), 1000 Genome Project (ftp://ftp.1000genomes.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/ftp), YH database (http://yh.genomics.org.cn/), Exome Variant Server (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/), and Exome Aggregation Consortium (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/), were subsequently used for the filtration process. Variants found homozygous or with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of over 0.01 in these SNP databases were then discarded. Intrafamilial cosegregation analysis and prevalence test in 150 additional controls were further conducted using Sanger sequencing with the primer information detailed in Supplementary Table S2.

In Silico Analysis

Vector NTI Advance 11 software (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) was applied to assess the evolutionary conservation of mutated residue by aligning the orthologous sequences of lebercilin in the following species, including Homo sapiens (ENSP00000376686), Pan troglodytes (ENSPTRP00000031394), Canis lupus familiars (ENSCAFP00000004169), Bos taurus (ENSBTAP00000053829), Sus scrofa (ENSSSCP00000004819), and Mus musculus (ENSMUSP00000034791).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Chen, X. et al. Next-generation Sequencing Extends the Phenotypic Spectrum for LCA5 Mutations: Novel LCA5 Mutations in Cone Dystrophy. Sci. Rep. 6, 24357; doi: 10.1038/srep24357 (2016).

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Leber Congenital Amaurosis. Date of access: 24/03/2016. Available from: (1993).

  2. 2.

    , , & Leber congenital amaurosis: genes, proteins and disease mechanisms. Prog Retin Eye Res 27, 391–419 (2008).

  3. 3.

    et al. Mutations in LCA5, encoding the ciliary protein lebercilin, cause Leber congenital amaurosis. Nat Genet 39, 889–895 (2007).

  4. 4.

    et al. Mutations in LCA5 are an uncommon cause of Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) type II. Hum Mutat 28, 1245 (2007).

  5. 5.

    et al. Identification of a novel splice-site mutation in the Lebercilin (LCA5) gene causing Leber congenital amaurosis. Mol Vis 14, 481–486 (2008).

  6. 6.

    et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation for leber congenital amaurosis in Northern Pakistan. Arch Ophthalmol 128, 107–113 (2010).

  7. 7.

    et al. Novel human pathological mutations. Gene symbol: LCA5. Disease: Leber congenital amaurosis. Hum Genet 127, 487 (2010).

  8. 8.

    et al. Visual acuity in patients with Leber’s congenital amaurosis and early childhood-onset retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology 117, 1190–1198 (2010).

  9. 9.

    et al. Detection of variants in 15 genes in 87 unrelated Chinese patients with Leber congenital amaurosis. PLos One 6, e19458 (2011).

  10. 10.

    et al. Identification of a novel LCA5 mutation in a Pakistani family with Leber congenital amaurosis and cataracts. Mol Vis 17, 1940–1945 (2011).

  11. 11.

    et al. Comprehensive mutation analysis by whole-exome sequencing in 41 Chinese families with Leber congenital amaurosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54, 4351–4357 (2013).

  12. 12.

    et al. Screening of a large cohort of leber congenital amaurosis and retinitis pigmentosa patients identifies novel LCA5 mutations and new genotype-phenotype correlations. Hum Mutat 34, 1537–1546 (2013).

  13. 13.

    et al. Involvement of LCA5 in Leber congenital amaurosis and retinitis pigmentosa in the Spanish population. Ophthalmology 121, 399–407 (2014).

  14. 14.

    , & The 2.2-A structure of the HP0958 protein from Helicobacter pylori reveals a kinked anti-parallel coiled-coil hairpin domain and a highly conserved ZN-ribbon domain. J Mol Biol 403, 405–419 (2010).

  15. 15.

    et al. Disruption of intraflagellar protein transport in photoreceptor cilia causes Leber congenital amaurosis in humans and mice. J Clin Invest 121, 2169–2180 (2011).

  16. 16.

    & Nonsense-mediated decay in genetic disease: friend or foe? Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res 762, 52–64 (2014).

  17. 17.

    et al. PRPF4 mutations cause autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Hum Mol Genet 23, 2926–2939 (2014).

  18. 18.

    et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing reveals novel USH2A mutations associated with diverse disease phenotypes: implications for clinical and molecular diagnosis. PLos One 9, e105439 (2014).

  19. 19.

    et al. Molecular Genetic Testing in Clinical Diagnostic Assessments That Demonstrate Correlations in Patients With Autosomal Recessive Inherited Retinal Dystrophy. JAMA Ophthalmol 133, 427–436 (2015). doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.5831.

  20. 20.

    et al. Novel and recurrent MYO7A mutations in Usher syndrome type 1 and type 2. PLos One 9, e97808 (2014).

  21. 21.

    et al. Targeted sequencing of 179 genes associated with hereditary retinal dystrophies and 10 candidate genes identifies novel and known mutations in patients with various retinal diseases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54, 2186–2197 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all patients and family members for their participation. This work was supported by grants from National Key Basic Research Program of China (2013CB967500 to C.Z.); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81525006 to C.Z., 81260154 to X.S.); Jiangsu Province’s Innovation Team (to C.Z.); the Fundamental Research Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology (to C.Z.); Jiangsu Province’s Scientific Research Innovation Program for Postgraduates (CXZZ13_0590 to X.C.); and A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

    • Xue Chen
    • , Xunlun Sheng
    •  & Xiantao Sun

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China

    • Xue Chen
    • , Yuxin Zhang
    • , Chao Jiang
    • , Sijia Ding
    •  & Chen Zhao
  2. Ningxia Eye Hospital, People Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Ningxia 750001, China

    • Xunlun Sheng
    • , Huiping Li
    • , Yani Liu
    • , Wenzhou Liu
    •  & Zili Li
  3. State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat Sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China

    • Xiantao Sun
  4. Department of Ophthalmology, Children’s Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, China

    • Chen Zhao

Authors

  1. Search for Xue Chen in:

  2. Search for Xunlun Sheng in:

  3. Search for Xiantao Sun in:

  4. Search for Yuxin Zhang in:

  5. Search for Chao Jiang in:

  6. Search for Huiping Li in:

  7. Search for Sijia Ding in:

  8. Search for Yani Liu in:

  9. Search for Wenzhou Liu in:

  10. Search for Zili Li in:

  11. Search for Chen Zhao in:

Contributions

Study design: X.C., X. Sheng and C.Z. Collected the samples and performed the experiments: X.C., X. Sun, Y.Z., H.L., Y.L., W.L. and Z.L. Data interpretation and analysis: X.C., X. Sheng, X. Sun, C.J. and S.D. Wrote the manuscript: X.C. and C.Z. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Zhao.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24357

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.