Abstract
A liquid-crystal (LC)-filled transmission electron microscopy (TEM) grid cell coated with the cationic surfactant dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB), to which a single-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid probe (ssDNAprobe) was adsorbed at the LC/aqueous interface (TEMDTAB/DNA), was applied for the highly specific detection of target DNA molecules. The DTAB-coated E7 (used LC mixture) in the TEM grid (TEMDTAB) exhibited a homeotropic orientation, and changed to a planar orientation upon adsorption of the ssDNAprobe. The TEMDTAB/DNA was then exposed to complementary (target) ssDNA, which resulted in a planar-to-homeotropic configurational change of E7 that could be observed through a polarized optical microscope under crossed polarizers. The optimum adsorption density (2 μM) of ssDNAprobe enabled the detection of ≥0.05 nM complementary ssDNA. This TEMDTAB/DNA biosensor could differentiate complementary ssDNA from mismatched ssDNA as well as double-stranded DNA. It also successfully detected the genomic DNAs of the bacterium Erwinia carotovora and the fungi Rhazictonia solani. Owe to the high specificity, sensitivity, and label-free detection, this biosensor may broaden the applications of LC-based biosensors to pathogen detection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In recent years, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-based biosensor systems have been developed in response to the growing interests in many fields, such as DNA diagnostics, gene analysis, fast detection of biological warfare agents, specific detection of pathogenic bacteria, and forensic applications1. To achieve the desired rapidity, sensitivity, and detection limit, DNA-based pathogen detection schemes often require amplification methods such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)2. The PCR-based detection methods have been used to identify pathogens by targeting their specific genes. However, these methods rely largely on labor-intensive gel-based detection processes that show poor sensitivity and specificity for the PCR products. Lengthy pre-PCR enrichment is often needed to improve the sensitivity, which adds considerable time to the detection procedure. Alternatively, numerous DNA detection systems based on the hybridization between a DNA target and its complementary probe, which is present either in solution or on a solid support, have been described3,4,5,35,36,37,38. A variety of DNA hybridization sensors that use various sensing technologies such as fluorescence, electrochemical, surface plasmon resonance, and surface-enhanced Raman scattering methodologies have therefore been proposed6,7,8. Frequently, the detection methods are based on a labeling approach. For example, microarray technologies (which rely on hybridization between DNA sequences on a microarray surface, using semiconductor crystals or quantum dots as fluorescent probes)9 are based on nanoparticle-amplified surface plasmon enhanced signals10 and the use of redox-active nucleic acid11. These homogenous assays allowing determination of DNA are of paramount importance because of their high sensitivity12. These techniques use organic fluorescent dyes as direct DNA hybridization probes, which are strongly emissive only when intercalated within the grooves of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). However, the assays lack sequence specificity, and fluorescence-based techniques with optical systems consisting of laser diode, photodiode, and filter appear to be very costly. The DNA detection systems using traditional energy or electron-transfer pairs for a strand-specific detector13 also require chemical labeling of two nucleic acids, or dual modification of the same altered strand. The difficulties in labeling two DNA sites give rise to low yields and singly labeled impurities, which lower the detection sensitivity.
Liquid crystals (LCs) are liquid phases with anisotropic properties. The simplest liquid crystal phase formed by low-molecular-weight rod-like molecules can be seen as a liquid possessing orientational molecular order. The parallel and perpendicular orientations of LC molecules to the surface are referred to as planar and homeotropic, respectively. When observed through polarized optical microscopy (POM) under crossed polarizers, the planar orientation creates birefringence with bright colors, whereas the homeotropic orientation does not allow birefringence and instead creates a black image. LCs have a very low interfacial energy (10−6–10−3 J/m2), causing amplification of the surface-induced ordering to a distance of ~100 μm (105 of molecular length)14. These properties, combined with their anisotropic physical properties, allow LCs to amplify and transduce the analyte-to-target binding into an optical output, which can be visualized using POM. Previously, LCs have been used for the detection of chemical and biological species, such as synthetic polymers, simple electrolytes, surfactants15,16, lipids17, proteins14,18,19, and endotoxins20. Several studies have also revealed that the response of LCs can be tuned to external stimuli by functionalizing it with surfactants and polyelectrolytes (PEs). For example, the spontaneous adsorption of surfactants and lipids at the LC/aqueous interface induces the planar-to-homeotropic (P-H) configurational change16. PEs such as poly(acrylic acid) (PAA)21, quaternized poly(4-vinylpyridine) (QP4VP)22, poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEA)23, and poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS)24 brushes have been applied to biosensors through adsorption of proteins onto LC-filled transmission electron microscopy (TEM) grid cells. A homeotropic orientation was observed when 5CB was coated with QP4VP (a strong cationic PE) and PSS (a strong anionic PE) regardless of pH, whereas the orientation was found to be pH dependent when it was coated with PAA (a weak anionic PE) and PDMAEA (a weak cationic PE). The pH dependencies of PAA and PDMAEA are due to deprotonation and protonation of the pendant group above and below their pKa values, respectively. A homeotropic-to-planar (H-P) change was observed after the complexation of the PEs with oppositely charged proteins. Thus, the high net charge density on the LC droplet causes a homeotropic orientation, and the H-P change occurs when the net charge density at the LC/aqueous interface decreases as a result of neutralization of the charges through the oppositely charged protein adsorbed. DNA is a strong anionic PE and is known to form insoluble complexes with cationic surfactants in aqueous medium. Previously, the adsorption of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) to a Langmuir monolayer of a cationic surfactant, as well as the change in molecular area upon hybridization of a target ssDNA (ssDNAtarget) with a membrane-bound probe ssDNA (ssDNAprobe) at the air/water interface, has been studied25.
In this study, as shown in Fig. 1, the cationic surfactant dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB) was adsorbed to form a self-assembled monolayer on the surface of an LC-filled TEM grid (TEMDTAB). This TEMDTAB grid cell was further functionalized with ssDNAprobe (TEMDTAB/DNA) by its electrostatic adsorption onto the DTAB monolayer for highly selective hybridization with ssDNAtarget, which could alter the LC anchoring as a result of the altered net charge density at the LC/aqueous interface. The selective detection capability of this TEMDTAB/DNA biosensor was investigated with an ssDNAtarget as well as mismatched ssDNAs. The biosensor was applied for the detection of pathogens such as bacteria (Erwinia carotovora) and fungi (Rhazictonia solani). This LC-based biosensor can be used without the need for molecular labeling or sophisticated instruments, giving it a lot of potential for effective applications to the detection of DNA.
Methods
Materials
Microscope glass slides (Duran Group, Germany) were cleaned using piranha solution (caution: piranha solution is extremely corrosive and must be handled carefully), and subsequently washed with distilled water and dried under nitrogen. Copper TEM specimen grids (G75 with a grid hole width of 285 μm, pitch of 340 μm, bar width of 55 μm, size of 3.05 mm, and thickness of 18 μm) were purchased from Ted Pella, Inc. USA., Octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS; Sigma Aldrich), E7 (100%; TCI America), DNA from salmon fish (Sigma-Aldrich), and human serum from platelet poor human plasma (Sigma Aldrich) were used as received from the manufacturer. The 16-mer ssDNA sequences 5′-GCACGAAGTTTTTTCT-3′, 5′-CGTGCTTCAAAAAAGA-3′, 5-CGTGCTTCAAATTTCT-3′, 5′-CGTGCTAGTTTTTTCT-3′, and 5′-AACGGGACTCGGGAGA-3′35 were purchased from M-Biotech Inc., South Korea. The 19-mer ssDNA sequences 5′-AGAGTTTATCMTGGCTCAG-3′ and 5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′, and the 20-mer ssDNA sequence 5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′, were extracted by PCR amplification.
Isolation of genomic DNA from bacteria
Genomic DNA was isolated from Erwinia carotovora (RSC-14 strain) using the protocol of Pitcher et al.26. The 16 s rRNA gene was amplified in a 50 μL reaction mixture of Taq DNA polymerase and universal primers F-27 (5′-AGAGTTTATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and R-1492 (5′-GRTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). The PCR was performed by pre-heating the reaction at 94 °C for 2 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final polymerization at 72 °C for 5 min. The resultant PCR product was purified and stored at −80 °C for further experimentation.
Isolation of genomic DNA from fungi
Genomic DNA from Rhazictonia solani was extracted from lyophilized mycelia according to the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method, with slight modifications27. Briefly, 300 mg of mycelia was thoroughly ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen, mixed with 10 mL of extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 50 mM EDTA, 0.7 M NaCl, 2% cetrimide, 1% SDS, and 50 μL β-mercaptoethanol), vortexed thoroughly, and incubated for 30 min at 65 °C with continuous shaking. The lysates were then extracted with an equal volume of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1) and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Finally, the DNA was precipitated by mixing with pre-chilled isopropanol and pelleted by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Subsequently, the DNA was washed twice with 600 μL of 70% ethanol, centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 1 min, and finally air-dried.
TEM grid cell preparation
A home-made polydimethylsiloxane flow cell was made using the same method reported elsewhere19,21. Briefly, glass microscope slides were cleaned and submerged in a solution of toluene (50 mL) and OTS (15 μl) for 1 h at 50 °C. The glass slides were subsequently washed with toluene, acetone, ethanol, and deionized water (DIW) and dried with a stream of nitrogen, and then wrapped in aluminum foil and stored at 40 °C under vacuum for 24 h. The OTS induces the perpendicular alignment of the LC. A copper TEM grid was placed on the surface of the 12 × 8 mm2 OTS-coated glass that was glued to another common slide glass with epoxy. A 1 μL drop of E7 was placed on a TEM grid using a 5 μL syringe (Hamilton Co., Reno, Nevada, USA). Excess E7 was removed with a capillary tube to obtain a uniform thin film. The two slide glasses spaced with silicon rubber (2 mm) were then clipped with binder-clips. E7 rather than 4-cyano-4′-pentylbiphenyl (5CB) was used owing to the need to facilitate a high nematic-to-isotropic transition. The inlet and outlet ports for exchanging the solutions were made with needles that were punched through the silicon rubber. The internal volume of the flow cell was 0.4 mL.
Adsorption of an ssDNAprobe
The E7-filled TEM grid was exposed to an aqueous solution of DTAB to form a self-assembled monolayer by spontaneous adsorption. In order to optimize the density of DTAB molecules at the E7/aqueous interface, DTAB aqueous solutions of different concentrations (CDTAB = 1–20 mM) were tested. After 30 min, the aqueous solution of an oligonucleotide, 16mer-5′-GCACGAAGTTTTTTCT-3′ (ssDNAprobe), was injected into the TEMDTAB grid cell and held for 1 h to ensure electrostatic interaction of the probe with the oppositely charged DTAB. In order to obtain a saturated amount of the deposited ssDNAprobe on the TEMDTAB grid, different concentrations of the oligonucleotide (Cprobe = 0.03–5 μM) were tested.
Detection of an ssDNAtarget
For use as a target DNA (ssDNAtarget), the 5′-CGTGCTTCAAAAAAGA-3′ oligonucleotide was dissolved in DIW. The melting temperature (Tm, the temperature at which 50% of the nucleotide is annealed) of the ssDNAtarget to the ssDNAprobe was 44.1 °C. The ssDNAtarget was injected onto the prepared TEMDTAB/DNA biosensor at room temperature and then heated to the Tm. For analysis of sensitivity, different concentrations of the ssDNAtarget (Ctarget = 0.05–10 nM) were tested. In order to test the specificity, ssDNAtarget sequences of different mismatch degrees, such as completely mismatched 5′-AACGGGACTCGGGAGA-3′ (ssDNAmm), 3-bp mismatched 5′-CGTGCTAGTTTTTTCT-3′ (ssDNA3bpmm), and 2-bp mismatched 5-CGTGCTTCAAATTTCT-3′ (ssDNA2bpmm), and dsDNA were tested.
Preparation of E7DTAB/DNA droplets
E7 (200 μl) was added to 10 mL of an 8 mM aqueous DTAB solution. The mixture solution was vortexed for 30 min to form E7 droplets. The resulting E7DTAB droplets were subsequently washed with DIW and functionalized with a 2-μM ssDNAprobe (E7DTAB/DNA). E7DTAB/DNA droplets were tested in ssDNAtarget aqueous solutions at different Ctargets.
Detection of pathogen DNA
The ssDNA sequences 19mer-5′-AGAGTTTATCMTGGCTCAG-3′ and 19mer-5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′ (or 20mer-5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) were used as probes for the detection of genomic ssDNAs of bacterium (ssDNAbc) and fungi (ssDNAfg), respectively. The genomic dsDNA from fungi was unzipped to obtain ssDNAfg by incubation at 92 °C for 30 min and quenching with dry ice. For the detection of ssDNAbc and ssDNAfg, the solutions were prepared in 5 mM NaCl to minimize the repulsion between the long ssDNA chains and tested at various concentrations (1–5 nM). For analysis of bacterium, an un-degraded ssDNAbc (DNA from PCR) and a thermally degraded ssDNAbc (annealed at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by quenching with dry ice) were used.
Measurements
Biometra’s TGradient thermal cycler PCR system (Analytik, Jena AG, Germany) was used for genomic DNA extraction. Images of the TEM grid cells during (and after) DNA injection were recorded using POM (ANA-006, Leitz, Germany) under crossed polarizers with a CCD camera (STC-TC83USB, Samwon, Korea). The temperature of the medium was controlled by using a heating glass (70270550, Live Cell Instruments, South Korea) connected to a heating glass controller (CU-201, Live Cell Instruments, South Korea). The optical birefringence (Δn) was measured using a tilting compensator equipped with a calcite compensator plate (type 2073 K, Leitz, Germany), with the source light intensity set to 50% of full illumination. At the 0 position of the compensator, the crystal axis was parallel to the polarizer axis. Δn is defined as Γ/d, where Γ is the phase difference and d is the sample thickness (1.8 × 104 nm). The Γ value was measured from the tilting angle (2i) using the equation , where is tabulated in the instrument manual and c is the compensator constant (4.54 × 104). The grey-scale intensity (GI) of the images was measured from 24,800 pixels at a fixed region using Adobe Photoshop CS5. The E7DTAB/DNA droplets were prepared by a vortex mixer (VM-10, DAIHAN Scientific Co., Ltd. South Korea). The charge density on the E7 droplets was studied using zeta potentiometry (Zatasizer Nano ZS90, Malvern Instruments Ltd., UK). All experiments were performed in triplicate and the standard deviations were measured.
Results and Discussion
TEMDTAB/DNA preparation
Figure 2 shows the POM images of the TEMDTABs at different CDTABs in aqueous medium. The E7 exhibited a planar orientation at CDTAB = 0 (Fig. 2a) that was maintained until CDTAB = 1 mM (Fig. 2b). Dark regions appeared and grew with an increase in CDTAB (2, 4, and 7 mM), as shown in Fig. 2c–e. A clear homeotropic orientation was observed at CDTAB ≥ 8 mM (Fig. 2f). The homeotropic orientation was due to the adsorption of the hydrophobic tail of the surfactant into the E7 molecules. Past studies have shown that the interaction of the surfactant tail and LC molecules largely dictates the orientation of the LC28,29. For example, compression of the Langmuir monolayer of 4-octyl-4′-cyanobiphenyl (8CB) and pentadecanoic acid (PDA) on water resulted in the vertical alignment of 8CB16. This alignment of 8CB was attributed to the interaction between the 8CB molecules and the tail of PDA, and the surfactant concentration had to be high enough to achieve a homeotropic orientation. Similarly, the self-assembled monolayers of surfactants deposited on the LC surface were found to control the orientation of the underneath LC30. The 8 mM solution of DTAB caused a clear homeotropic orientation of E7 at the LC/aqueous interface, and so the concentration of DTAB in water was fixed at 8 mM for all experiments, unless otherwise specified.
In order to obtain the optimum ssDNAprobe, the TEMDTAB/DNA grids were prepared at different Cprobe (16mer) values. The homeotropic orientation was maintained at Cprobe = 0.03 μM (Fig. 3ai) but slowly changed to a planar orientation with slight birefringence at Cprobe = 0.05 μM (Fig. 3aii). The birefringence became more visible at Cprobe = 0.1 and 0.5 μM (Fig. 3aiii,iv) and was more evident at Cprobe ≥1 μM (Fig. 3av,vi). The H-P change was due to electrostatic interaction between the surfactant and ssDNAprobe. The complexation of Langmuir monolayers of cationic surfactants of CTAB and octadecylamine with ssDNA has been studied by Symietz et al.25. It was found that the interfacial electrostatic interactions between the surfactants and ssDNA resulted in an effective increase in the size of the surfactant head because of steric interactions or intercalation of ssDNA into the head-group layer. Other studies have reported that the high charge density on the LC surface by decoration of PE causes homeotropic orientation of the LCs at the LC/aqueous interface, whereas neutralizing the charge density with oppositely charged proteins results in H-P transition of the LC molecules23,24. The birefringence (Δn) is an indicator of the degree of angle tilt of the LC molecules31. The charge on the LC surface may affect the tilting angle of LC molecules against the surface. Figure 3b shows the plot of Δn against Cprobe. The Δn increased rapidly until Cprobe = 2 μM and then became saturated after that. The Δn values obtained for 2 μM of 19-mer and 20mer ssDNAprobes were 0.079 ± 0.005 and 0.08 ± 0.007, respectively, these were consistent with the value of 16-mer. The increase of Δn was because the initial perpendicular orientation of LC was progressively tilted to the parallel orientation as Cprobe increased until reaching 2 μM. Further increase in Cprobe did not change the LC orientation, and so 2 μM ssDNAprobe was used for preparation of the TEMDTAB/DNA, unless otherwise specified.
Detection of target DNA
The initial planar orientation of the TEMDTAB/DNA was preserved (Fig. 4a) after injection of a 50 nM aqueous solution of ssDNAtarget into the cell at room temperature. As the temperature was increased to the Tm of ssDNAtarget (44.1 °C), homeotropic domains started to appear (Fig. 4b) and covered the entire area, making it completely dark 5 min after injection of the ssDNAtarget (Fig. 4c). This P-H transition is due to the hybridization between the ssDNAprobe and ssDNAtarget, which increases the net charge density at the LC/aqueous interface. The PCR, uses a high concentration of counter ions (NaCl 0.5–1 M) to minimize the repulsion between the ssDNA chains and promote hybridization. However, the oppositely charged cationic surfactant bound with the ssDNAprobe provided a favorable environment for hybridization without salt. Since an increase in temperature may affect the LC orientation, the TEMDTAB/DNA was heated at Tm (44.1 °C) in order to confirm that the homeotropic orientation was due to the hybridization only. No P-H change was observed (Fig. 4d), indicating that the hybridization of the ssDNAprobe and ssDNAtarget caused the orientation change of E7 at the LC/aqueous interface.
Sensitivity and mechanism of detection
The performance of TEMDTAB/DNA was tested at different Ctarget values. At Ctarget <0.05 nM, no P-H change was observed. At Ctarget = 0.05 nM, nucleation of the homeotropic domain started to become evident (Fig. 5ai). At 0.1 ≤ Ctarget ≤5 nM, the homeotropic domain grew with the increase in Ctarget (Fig. 5aii–vi). At Ctarget ≥ 6 nM, clear homeotropic patterns were observed (Fig. 5avii,viii). These results indicate that even small amounts of ssDNAtarget could significantly alter the E7 orientation. The increase in loss of brightness (φ) concurrent with progressive P-H change from the increase in Ctarget is an indication of the quantity of the hybridized ssDNAtarget. The φ was calculated using Equation (1):
where φo and φf are the brightness of the TEMDTAB/DNA grid area before and after the interaction with ssDNAtarget, respectively, where the brightness was measured from the GI value. Figure 5b shows the plot of φ as a function of Ctarget. The φ increased sharply at Ctarget ≤ 0.1 nM, and then slowly increased until Ctarget = 6 nM, and became saturated after that. A notable difference in the POM image of the TEMDTAB/DNA grid area and the φ value can be found at Ctarget values of 0.04 and 0.05 nM, respectively. For the detection of DNA, Tan et al. used an LC biosensing technique that was based on the use of biotinylated DNA and ascorbic acid-2-phosphate bonded with streptavidin, followed by enzymatic silver metal deposition32. This system could detect up to 0.001 nM of DNA and saturation was at 0.1 nM. However, the use of labeled DNA and enzyme makes this method complex and costly for practical application. Our TEMDTAB/DNA biosensor is a comparatively simpler and label-free technique that can detect DNAtarget at as low as 0.05 nM concentration, with a large saturation value of 6 nM.
Charge states of the TEMDTAB/DNA at different Ctarget values were determined using the E7DTAB/DNA droplets. The E7DTAB/DNA droplets at different Ctargets was observed at Tm = 44.1 °C under cross polarizers (Fig. 6a), and their net charge density was found by zeta potential (Fig. 6b). A similar bipolar to radial orientational change (B-R change) was observed with an increase of Ctarget. This B-R change was attributed to the hybridized ssDNAtarget, which increased the net charge density at the E7/aqueous interface. The zeta potential of the E7DTAB/DNA droplets confirms that the anionic charge density of the E7DTAB/DNA droplet increased with an increase of Ctarget, reaching a saturation value of −32 mV at a Ctarget of 5 nM. Compared with φ, the Ctarget at which the saturation occurs (5 nM) during zeta potential measurements differs from that of GI measurements (6 nM). This difference may be due to a difference in the experimental platform. Moreover, these results support our claim that hybridization of ssDNAtarget causes high anionic charge density leading to an orientational change of the liquid crystal in TEMDTAB/DNA.
Selectivity and stability
In order to determine the selectivity of TEMDTAB/DNA, ssDNAs with different degrees of mismatch were tested. The TEMDTAB/DNAs was subjected to 10 nM aqueous solutions of each ssDNAmm, ssDNA3bpmm, and ssDNA2bpmm. Whereas there was no P-H change in the ssDNAmm solution (Fig. 7ai), the ssDNA3bpmm solution generated scattered homeotropic domains (Fig. 7aii) and the ssDNA2bpmm solution exhibited dominant homeotropic domains (Fig. 7aiii). Thus, ssDNA with complete mismatch (ssDNAmm) does not change the initial planar orientation owing to difficulty in hybridization with ssDNAprobe, but ssDNAs with 2- and 3-bp mismatches (DNA2bpmm and DNA3bpmm) cause scattered homeotropic domains, indicating that the degree of mismatch in ssDNAtarget influences the LC configuration through different degrees of hybridization. The specificity for the target ssDNA is known to decrease as the chain length of the probe ssDNA decreases33. However, this TEM grid biosensor differentiated complete, 2-bp, and 3-bp mismatched ssDNAs from a complementary (target) ssDNA, even in 16-mer oligonucleotides, indicating that it provides high specificity. In order to check whether the hybridization between target and probe ssDNAs is a main factor for changing the LC orientation, dsDNA (which does not have the ability for hybridization) was tested. The planar orientation was preserved (Fig. 7aiv), confirming that the P-H change is due to the hybridization between the probe and target ssDNAs. The activity of TEMDTAB/DNA biosensor was mainly dependent on the stability of the adsorbed DTAB and ssDNAprobe. The leaching of DTAB or ssDNA in aqueous medium may result in change in the optical appearance of the E7 and the GI. The GI vs. time in days was found from various TEMDTAB and TEMDTAB/DNA grid cells stored at room temperature as shown in Fig. 7b. The TEMDTAB/DNA grid cells were tested for ssDNAtarget (8 nM) detection with the passage of time. Clear homeotropic orientations (Figure supporting information (SI) 1) and no significant change in GI (Fig. 7b) over 10 days suggested that it could detect ssDNAtarget in the same manner as the freshly prepared TEMDTAB/DNA grid cell. Thus these results reflect adequate stability of the TEMDTAB/DNA grid biosensor.
Detection of pathogens and real sample analysis
The TEMDTAB/DNA grid cell was used for the detection of genomic DNAs of the pathogens Erwinia carotovora and Rhazictonia solani (ssDNAbc and ssDNAfg, respectively). Erwinia carotovora is a gram-negative bacterium carries the specific genomic DNA sequence 5′-TCTCAAACTAGAACCGAGTC-3′ in its DNA chain, the complementary ssDNA oligomer 5′-AGAGTTTATCMTGGCTCAG-3′ (F27) was used as the detection probe. Similarly, because the Rhazictonia solani fungi has DNA sequences complementary to the universal primers ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′), either of these primers can be used as the detection probe. The response of TEMDTAB/DNAs functionalized with F27 was observed in a 10 nM aqueous ssDNAbc solution. The planar orientation was maintained when the temperature was increased and held at Tm = 52.4 °C (Fig. 8ai). However, clear homeotropic domains appeared 5 min after the thermally degraded ssDNAbc was injected (Fig. 8aii), indicating that the high-molecular-weight target ssDNA had difficulties in hybridizing with the ssDNAprobe, consistent with other reports33. Figure 8aiii,iv show the POM images of TEMDTAB/DNAs functionalized with ITS1 and ITS4, respectively, after injection of the thermally unzipped ssDNAfg into the TEMDTAB/DNA cell. Clear homeotropic orientations were observed for both primers. However, no P-H change was observed when the dsDNA solution of Rhazictonia solani fungus was injected (Fig. 8av), indicating again that hybridization was the key factor for this orientational change. In order to confirm whether hybridization is the key factor or not, a random 16-mer 5′-AACGGGACTCGGGAGA-3′ ssDNA was used as a probe ssDNA, with otherwise same experimental conditions. The planar orientation was preserved when the thermally degraded ssDNAbc (Fig. 8avi) solution was injected, indicating that the P-H change was due to hybridization. Thus, this TEMDTAB/DNA biosensor has the capability to be used as a biosensor for the specific detection of pathogens.
The half maximal effective concentration (EC50, the concentration of an analyte half way between the baseline and maximum) evaluates the suitability and the performance of an assay. A common way of defining the EC50 response is to use a mathematical model (eq. (2)) known as a 4-parameter logistic model.
where y, x, min, max, and b are the response, concentration, lower asymptote, upper asymptote, and hillslope, respectively. The response of TEMDTAB/DNA was observed at different concentrations of ssDNAbc (Cbacteria) as shown in Figure SI2. The φ increased with an increase in Cbacteria (Fig. 8b). The estimated EC50 of 1.89 nM was obtained, corresponding to the min and max values of 0.08 and 97%, respectively with b = 0.64. This value may be slightly higher than the actual value because of the missing Cbacteria on the upper plateau as reported elsewhere34. However, this EC50 value was within the linear range (0.5–6 nM) of the TEMDTAB/DNA biosensor. In order to find the effect of associated proteins and other active chemicals on ssDNAbc detection, mixture solutions of human serum (2 mg/mL) and thermally degraded ssDNAbc (Cbacteria = 0.5, 3, and 6 nM) were prepared. The human serum consists of cholesterol, glucose, sodium, iron, proteins, endotoxin, and triglyceride. The TEMDTAB/DNA maintained the planar orientation in aqueous solution of human serum (Fig. 8ci). A slight P-H change was observed at Cbacteria = 0.5 nM (Fig. 8cii). The homeotropic orientation became more visible at high Cbacteria = 3 and 6 nM (Fig. 8ciii,iv). The φ values for the mixture solutions were found to be 28.32 ± 1.52, 47.69 ± 1.89, and 68.13 ± 1.97 which lies in the standard error range of the corresponding pure solutions 27.03 ± 1.38, 53.53 ± 1.80, and 66.98 ± 1.54 at Cbacteria = 0.5, 3, and 6 nM, respectively. Thus, TEMDTAB/DNA provides enough specificity for ssDNAbc detection even in a complex mixture.
Conclusions
An E7-filled TEM grid cell, functionalized by coating with the cationic surfactant DTAB and subsequent adsorption of ssDNAprobe at the LC/aqueous interface, was used for highly specific detection of target DNA molecules. Functionalization of the DTAB-coated TEM grid cell was successfully achieved by the electrostatic interactions between the cationic DTAB and the anionic ssDNAprobe. The changes in the LC orientation brought about by hybridization between the complementary probe and target ssDNAs in the TEM grid cell could be applied as a biosensor for specific ssDNAtarget detection, with a sensitivity of 0.05 nM. The P-H change of the LC molecules could be monitored from its optical appearance through POM, without the need for sophisticated instruments. This biosensor can also differentiate mismatched ssDNA from complementary ssDNA, making it suitable for label-free detection of specific pathogen DNA.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Khan, M. et al. A liquid-crystal-based DNA biosensor for pathogen detection. Sci. Rep. 6, 22676; doi: 10.1038/srep22676 (2016).
Change history
17 May 2018
A correction has been published and is appended to both the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper.
17 May 2018
Scientific Reports 6: Article number: 22676; published online: 04 March 2016; updated: 17 May 2018 In this Article, the authors neglected to cite related relevant studies investigating the detection of target DNA at LC/aqueous interface. These references should have been listed in the original reference list as Ref 35-38 and should appear in the text as follows.
References
Sassolas, A., Leca-Bouvier, B. D. & Blum, L. J. DNA Biosensors and Microarrays. Chem. Rev. 108, 109–139, doi: 10.1021/cr0684467 (2008).
Mao, X., Yang, L., Su, X.-L. & Li, Y. A nanoparticle amplification based quartz crystal microbalance DNA sensor for detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Biosens. Bioelectron . 21, 1178–1185, doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2005.04.021 (2006).
Monserud, J. H. & Schwartz, D. K. Mechanisms of Surface-Mediated DNA Hybridization. ACS Nano 8, 4488–4499, doi: 10.1021/nn4064874 (2014).
Fanget, A. et al. Nanopore Integrated Nanogaps for DNA Detection. Nano Lett. 14, 244–249, doi: 10.1021/nl403849g (2014).
Carlsen, A. T., Zahid, O. K., Ruzicka, J. A., Taylor, E. W. & Hall, A. R. Selective Detection and Quantification of Modified DNA with Solid-State Nanopores. Nano Lett. 14, 5488–5492, doi: 10.1021/nl501340d (2014).
Chen, X. et al. DNA optical sensor: a rapid method for the detection of DNA hybridization. Biosens. Bioelectron. 13, 451–458, doi: 10.1016/S0956-5663(97)00095-X (1998).
Wang, J. et al. DNA electrochemical biosensors for environmental monitoring. A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 347, 1–8, doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(96)00598-3 (1997).
Li, J. & Lee, E.-C. Carbon nanotube/polymer composite electrodes for flexible, attachable electrochemical DNA sensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 71, 414–419, doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.04.045 (2015).
Gerion, D. et al. Sorting Fluorescent Nanocrystals with DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 7070–7074, doi: 10.1021/ja017822w (2002).
He, L. et al. Colloidal Au-Enhanced Surface Plasmon Resonance for Ultrasensitive Detection of DNA Hybridization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 9071–9077, doi: 10.1021/ja001215b (2000).
Patolsky, F., Weizmann, Y. & Willner, I. Redox-Active Nucleic-Acid Replica for the Amplified Bioelectrocatalytic Detection of Viral DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 770–772, doi: 10.1021/ja0119752 (2002).
Liu, B. & Bazan, G. C. Homogeneous Fluorescence-Based DNA Detection with Water-Soluble Conjugated Polymers. Chem. Mater. 16, 4467–4476, doi: 10.1021/cm049587x (2004).
Castro, A. & Williams, J. G. K. Single-Molecule Detection of Specific Nucleic Acid Sequences in Unamplified Genomic DNA. Anal. Chem. 69, 3915–3920, doi: 10.1021/ac970389h (1997).
Gupta, V. K., Skaife, J. J., Dubrovsky, T. B. & Abbott, N. L. Optical Amplification of Ligand-Receptor Binding Using Liquid Crystals. Science 279, 2077–2080 (1998).
Luk, Y.-Y. & Abbott, N. L. Applications of functional surfactants. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci . 7, 267–275 (2002).
Brake, J. M., Mezera, A. D. & Abbott, N. L. Effect of Surfactant Structure on the Orientation of Liquid Crystals at Aqueous-Liquid Crystal Interfaces. Langmuir 19, 6436–6442 (2003).
Brake, J. M., Daschner, M. K., Luk, Y. Y. & Abbott, N. L. Biomolecular Interactions at Phospholipid-Decorated Surfaces of Liquid Crystals. Science 302, 2094–2097 (2003).
Jang, C. H. et al. Using Liquid Crystals to Report Membrane Proteins Captured by Affinity Microcontact Printing from Cell Lysates and Membrane Extracts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 8912–8913 (2005).
Seo, J. M., Khan, W. & Park, S.-Y. Protein detection using aqueous/LC interfaces decorated with a novel polyacrylic acid block liquid crystalline polymer. Soft Matter 8, 198–203 (2012).
Miller, D. S. & Abbott, N. L. Influence of droplet size, pH and ionic strength on endotoxin-triggered ordering transitions in liquid crystalline droplet. Soft Matter 9, 374–382 (2013).
Lee, D. Y. et al. pH-responsive aqueous/LC interfaces using SGLCP-b-polyacrylic acid block copolymers. Soft Matter 6, 1964–1970 (2010).
Omer, M. & Park, S.-Y. Preparation of QP4VP-b-LCP liquid crystal block copolymer and its application as a biosensor. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 1–10, doi: 10.1007/s00216-014-7900-y (2014).
Omer, M. et al. Biosensor utilizing a liquid crystal/water interface functionalized with poly(4-cyanobiphenyl-4′-oxyundecylacrylate-b-((2-dimethyl amino) ethyl methacrylate)). Colloids Surf., B 121, 400–408, doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.06.028 (2014).
Omer, M. et al. Liquid crystal-based biosensors using a strong polyelectrolyte-containing block copolymer, poly(4-cyanobiphenyl-4′-oxyundecylacrylate)-b-poly(sodium styrene sulfonate). Macromol. Res. 22, 888–894, doi: 10.1007/s13233-014-2112-z (2014).
Symietz, C., Schneider, M., Brezesinski, G. & Möhwald, H. DNA Alignment at Cationic Lipid Monolayers at the Air/Water Interface. Macromolecules 37, 3865–3873, doi: 10.1021/ma0348425 (2004).
Pitcher, D. G., Saunders, N. A. & Owen, R. J. Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 8, 151–156, doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1989.tb00262.x (1989).
Abmayr, S. M. et al. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology ringbou edn, (eds Frederick M.A. et al.) Ch. 1, 26–151 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2003).
Lockwood, N. A., de Pablo, J. J. & Abbott, N. L. Influence of Surfactant Tail Branching and Organization on the Orientation of Liquid Crystals at Aqueous−Liquid Crystal Interfaces. Langmuir 21, 6805–6814, doi: 10.1021/la050231p (2005).
Luk, Y.-Y. & Abbott, N. L. Applications of functional surfactants. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci . 7, 267–275 (2002).
Barmentlo, M. & Vrehen, Q. H. F. Reorientation of liquid-crystal (LC) molecules in mixed surfactant/LC Langmuir films. Chem. Phys. Lett. 209, 347–351, doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(93)80028-N (1993).
Khan, M. & Park, S.-Y. Liquid Crystal-Based Proton Sensitive Glucose Biosensor. Anal. Chem. 86, 1493–1501, doi: 10.1021/ac402916v (2014).
Tan, H., Yang, S., Shen, G., Yu, R. & Wu, Z. Signal-Enhanced Liquid-Crystal DNA Biosensors Based on Enzymatic Metal Deposition. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 8608–8611, doi: 10.1002/anie.201004272 (2010).
Baker, B. A. & Milam, V. T. Hybridization kinetics between immobilized double-stranded DNA probes and targets containing embedded recognition segments. Nucl. Acids Res. 39, e99, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr293 (2011).
Sebaugh, J. L. Guidelines for accurate EC50/IC50 estimation. Pharm Stat . 10, 128–134, doi: 10.1002/pst.426 (2011).
Price, A. D., Schwartz, D. K. DNA hybridization-induced reorientation of liquid crystal anchoring at the nematic liquid crystal/aqueous interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc . 130, 8188–8194, (2008).
McUmber, A. C., Noonan, P. S., Schwartz, D. K. Surfactant-DNA interactions at the liquid crystal-aqueous interface. Soft Matter . 8, 4335–4342, doi: 10.1039/c2sm07483d (2012).
Lai, S. L., Hartono, D., Yang, K.-L. Self-assembly of cholesterol DNA at liquid crystal/aqueous interface and its application for DNA detection. Appl. Phys. Lett . 95, 153702, doi: 10.1063/1.3247895 (2009).
Lai, S. L., Yang, K. L. Detecting DNA targets through the formation of DNA/CTAB complex and its interactions with liquid crystals. Analyst . 136, 3329–3334, (2011).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2011-0020264 and NRF-2014R1A2A1A11050451).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.Y.P. and M.K. designed the study. M.K. performed the biosensor experiments. A.R.K. cultured the pathogens and did DNA amplification with PCR. J.H.S. guided A.R.K., and provided pathogens for this study. S.Y.P. and M.K. analyzed and interpreted the data, drafted, critically revised, and finalized the intellectual contents of the manuscript. All authors read, and agreed to the finalized contents of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, M., Khan, A., Shin, JH. et al. A liquid-crystal-based DNA biosensor for pathogen detection. Sci Rep 6, 22676 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22676
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22676
This article is cited by
-
Longer amplicons provide better sensitivity for electrochemical sensing of viral nucleic acid in water samples using PCB electrodes
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Liquid crystal-based optical aptasensor for the sensitive and selective detection of Gram-negative bacteria
Science China Chemistry (2022)
-
Label-Free Detection of Single Living Bacteria via Electrochemical Collision Event
Scientific Reports (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.