Abstract
Innovative floral organs are widely distributed taxonomically in angiosperms and some of them are conspicuous and curious in morphology. Floral organs have long been supposed to play a crucial role in fertilization by pollinators. However, why innovative organs occur, how they are adapted for pollinators and what sexual roles they play are still puzzling. Here we focused on a wild ginger (Zingiber densissimum, Zingiberaceae) and tested the function of the curious anther crest, an innovative floral structure widely distributed in Zingiberaceae. The anther crest is a specialized anther appendage that extends up from the top of the anther to form a tail-like structure, about 150% as long as the anther. We found this structure promoted both the male and the female functions of plants by manipulating its pollinators and causing pollinators to adopt a position ideal for pollen removal and receipt. This study provides a novel example of structure adaptation in which both the male and the female functions are enhanced by resource allocation on a male organ, expanding the knowledge of the sexual roles of the anther appendage.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Since Darwin, it has been interpreted that flowers are adapted for fertilization by pollinators1. Floral traits, such as color, shape and size, can be fully understood only when considering their functions in adaptation for pollinators2,3, since floral traits are primarily shaped during the mutual selection between flowers and their pollinators1,4,5,6.
In angiosperms, innovative floral organs, such as vestigial and derived organs, are widely distributed taxonomically, occurring at least in 32.5% of families and 54.4% of genera in these families7, with some innovative floral organs strange and conspicuous in morphology. Why these organs occur and how they are adapted for pollinators have long been puzzling8,9. Limited evidences show that the innovative organ plays a key role in pollination process. For example, the curious sterile inflorescence axis of the South African Cape endemic plant (Babiana ringens, Iridaceae) functions to provide a perch for its bird pollinators and cause its pollinator to adopt a position ideal for the cross-pollination of its ground-level flowers, thus promoting seed production10. The anther appendage in numerous plant groups, such as genera of Salvia (Lamiaceae), Torenia (Scrophulariaceae) and Incarvillea (Bignoniaceae), functions to promote pollen dispersal via different manners11,12,13. Nevertheless, previous studies on innovative organs were limited to test the function either on seed production (female function) or on pollen dispersal (male function). Few studies have simultaneously examined the bisexual roles and even no studies link the functions of innovative organs to resource allocation on two genders.
Zingiberales, ancestrally pollinated by animals, have exhibited extremely diversified pollination syndromes, including the syndromes of bees, moths, butterflies, flies, beetles, birds, bats and mammals (lemurs) — almost all of the biotic pollination syndromes recorded in angiosperms14,15,16. This plant group therefore provides an ideal model to explore natural selection and coevolution between plants and pollinators. Flowers in more than 25 genera of ginger family (Zingiberaceae) have an innovative floral structure — anther crest, a specialized anther appendage which extends up from the top of the anther. With great variation in shape and size among different genera, this derived structure is widely distributed in Zingiberaceae. However, it is still unknown why such a device is kept during natural selection. Here we focus on the curious anther crest of a wild ginger (Zingiber densissimum). About 150% as long as the anther, the specialized yellow anther crest in this species elongates from the top of the anther and tapers off to a point, forming a tail-like anther crest (TAC) (Fig. 1A,B). Such a conspicuous anther crest is extremely rare even in the entire angiosperm flowers. We are therefore intrigued to explore why flowers invest such considerable resource on this contrivance. We test several adaptive possibilities in sexual reproduction as follows. (1) Does the TAC function as a resource pool to promote seed development after fertilization of ovules? (2) Is the TAC attractive to pollinators during pollination process? (3) Does the TAC have the function of manipulating pollinators’ foraging behaviours? We then proceed to evaluate the contributions of the TAC on the male and the female fitness of plants, respectively and examine whether the functional role of this contrivance in pollination process matches its sexual role on resource allocation.
Results
Functions of the TAC
The TAC-removed and hand self-pollinated flowers produced 11.4 ± 1.2 seeds (n = 31), as many as the intact and hand self-pollinated flowers that produced 12.1 ± 0.9 seeds (n = 36) (t-test, t = 0.47, P = 0.64). This indicates that TAC removal does not affect seed provisioning.
The intact flower got first visited in 29 floral pairs, while the TAC-removed flower got first visited in 21 floral pairs. There is no significant difference between the intact flowers and the TAC-removed flowers on pollinator attraction (df = 1, χ2 = 1.96, P = 0.1615). This result indicates that the TAC has little function on pollinator attraction.
Two bee species, Macropis hedini (Melittidae) and Amegilla zonata (Apidae), were the pollinators of Z. densissimum17. During nectar foraging, M. hedini generally visited flowers in upright manner and pushed up the TAC with its head, achieving dorsal pollination, while A. zonata probed nectar in upright-down manner and pushed up the TAC with its legs, achieving ventral pollination (legitimate visit) (Fig. 1C, Supplementary video 1). The TAC acted as a handle for pollinators to push up the anther during their foraging process (Fig. 1C, Supplementary video 1)17. In TAC-removed flowers, significantly more pollinator individuals of the two pollinator species did not push up the anther during nectar foraging (Fig. 2A, Table 1). Instead, they directly inserted the proboscis into the floral tube from the side of the filament, without touching the stigma or the anther (illegitimate visit) (Supplementary video 2). This reveals that the TAC functions to manipulate pollinator’s foraging behaviour.
Evaluation on sexual roles of the TAC
After a single visit by pollinator, pollen grains left on the control flowers were significantly fewer than those left on the TAC-removed flowers (Fig. 2B, Table 1), indicating the TAC promotes pollen removal. The contribution of the anther crest on male fitness (Cm) was 40.7%. Flowers in control group had significantly higher fruit set (Fig. 2C, Table 2) and produced significantly more seeds than flowers in manipulation group (Fig. 2C, Table 2), showing the TAC functions to promote pollen deposition. The contribution of the anther crest on female fitness (Cf) was 51.4% in 2011 and 50.5% in 2012. These results indicate that TAC functions as both male and female during pollination success of plants, with female function even greater than male.
Discussion
Our study shows that the TAC plays a key role on pollinator’s behaviour manipulation, while it has little function on pollinator attraction or on seed development. To achieve pollination success, flowers provide diverse rewards and reward signals to attract pollinators18,19,20,21. However, upon attracted, pollinators are coming for getting rewards rather than providing pollination service for flowers22,23. Thereby, in addition to attract pollinators, flowers should develop other strategies or structures to ensure precise pollination by pollinators. The style of flowers in Zingiberaceae is generally soft and string-like and fixed by the anther (Fig. 1A). The whole anther with the TAC is positioned in the entrance of the corolla tube, an obstacle for pollinators to get the nectar. Therefore, pushing up the anther by pollinators is an essential process for pollen dispersal and deposition. In intact flower group, majority of bees (about 90%) pushed up the anther during nectar foraging, acting primarily as the pollinator. The TAC provides bees with a handle during their nectar foraging (Fig. 2A, Table 1, Supplementary video 1). By contrast, in TAC-removed flower group, significantly more bees directly probed the nectar from the side of the filament in illegitimate manner without pushing up the anther, acting more as the nectar thief than the pollinator (Fig. 2A, Table 1, Supplementary video 2). The results indicate the TAC functions to manipulate pollinator’s behaviour and cause pollinators to adopt a position ideal for pollination success, which is similar to the function of the sterile inflorescence axis in Babiana ringens (Iridaceae)10. The maintenance of the mutualism between flowers and pollinators demands the precise pollination during nectar foraging by animals. If these animals act as nectar robbers or nectar thieves, getting the rewards but without serving flowers, both male and female fitness of plants will be decreased24,25. The presence of the TAC significantly promoted the reproductive fitness, which is probably why flowers invest such considerable resource on this unusual structure of the anther crest. The TAC here functions to actively manipulate pollinator’s foraging behavior, which is different from any other previously reported anther appendages that exclusively function to passively adapt for the pollinator’s foraging behaviours. So far as we know, anther appendages in Roscoea gingers, Salvia (Lamiaceae) and Torenia (Scrophulariaceae) function as levers to tilt the anther thus facilitating pollen loading on pollinators11,12,26; in Globba gingers, the wing-like anther appendage, extended from the two sides of the anther, has been hypothesized to promote the anther full contact with the pollinator27; and anther appendages in other angiosperms play a role in anther dehiscence and pollen dispensing13,28.
Although the TAC is a male organ derived from the anther, it has functions of both the male and the female. In our study, flowers without the TAC had significantly fewer pollen grains transported out during a single visit by pollinators (Fig. 2B) and produced fewer fruits and seeds than the intact flowers (Fig. 2C). The contribution of TAC on female function is 51.4%, higher than that in male function, which is 40.7%, according to our evaluation. The TAC therefore functions both male and female, with the female function even greater than the male function. The function of the anther appendage in Z. densissimum is different from what have been reported in other angiosperm families where the function of anther appendages is restricted to the male. For example, the anther appendage in Salvia (Lamiaceae) and Torenia (Scrophulariaceae) functions as levers to tilt the anther thus facilitating pollen loading on pollinators, but with little function in female11,12; anther appendages in Ericaceae, genera of Viola and Hybanthus (Violaceae) and Incarvillea (Bignoniaceae) have a function in anther dehiscence and pollen dispensing13,28,29,30,31. Unlike other angiosperm species, the filiform styles of gingers are soft and hold between pollen sacs of anthers and form an anther-stigma cooperation system, which is the characteristic of Zingiberaceae. This is possibly why the anther crest contributes on both the male and the female functions. The anther appendage in Z. densissimum may have evolved under selective pressure imposed via the reproductive fitness of both the male and the female. The TAC, derived from the anther connective, is a part of the anther and morphologically male. The TAC will therefore be attributed to resource allocation on the male organ according to sex allocation theory32. However, it has both the male and the female roles in function. The contradiction between the morphological gender and the ecological function for TAC indicates that the methodology in sexual allocation theory of hermaphrodites, which partitions floral organs into exclusively male or female32,33, is not appropriate. The purpose of diverse strategies of resource allocation on sexual organs is to achieve the maximum total fitness (male fitness + female fitness). In doing so, one sexual organ may have the complementary effect on the alternative sexual role within a flower.
Our study indicates the TAC, a contrivance of the anther (male organ), functions to manipulate pollinator’s behaviour, thus enhancing both male and female functions. This study provides a novel example of structure adaptation in which both the male and the female fitnesses are enhanced by resource allocation on a device derived from the male organ, expanding the knowledge of the sexual role of the anther appendage.
Methods
Study sites and species
This study was conducted in Lincang, Yunnan province, southwest of China (23°35′ N, 100°04′ E; altitude 1890 m) from 2011 to 2012. Individuals of Zingiber densissimum in this wild population grow in a pine forest. In this study, permission was got from the owner of the land to conduct the study on this site. No endangered or protected species were involved.
Zingiber densissimum is a perennial herb endemic to southwest Yunnan province in China. The individual generally has one to four conical inflorescences arising from rhizomes, with 10 to 20 flowers per inflorescence and one flower opening on each inflorescence per day. Flowers are opening in the morning and closing in the late evening, with the floral longevity less than one day. The tubular flower has three corolla lobes and six stamens, with four of the stamens petaloid and unfertile, one reduced and only one fertile. The anther is light yellow, with connective extended apically into a tail-like anther crest (Fig. 1A,B). This species is an outcrossing species and sexual reproduction demands pollination by insects17.
Functions of the TAC
To examine the effect of the TAC removal on the interference on seed provisioning, single flowers from more than 60 individuals were randomly and evenly allocated in two groups: (1) flowers were anther crest-removed and hand self-pollinated and (2) flowers were intact and hand self-pollinated. All the flowers were bagged during flowering stage. Fruits were collected after one month for seed count. A t-test was used to test the difference on seed production.
To investigate whether the TAC functioned to attract pollinators, 50 individuals were selected. For each individual, two simultaneously opening flowers were labelled as a pair, with the distance of the two flowers less than 15 cm in each pair. Flowers were bagged before anthesis to decrease the difference in nectar reward. The anther crest was removed randomly from one of each pair of flowers, with the other intact as the control. The flower that pollinator first visited was recorded in each pair. To reduce the specific preference of pollinator individuals, floral pairs were set at different patches and/or different days. The difference of pollinator preference between the two groups was analyzed using a chi-square test. In this study, two pollinator species were distinguished during field observation. Given that the two bee species were the effective pollinators of Z. densissimum17, they were equally treated and summed up during analysis.
To explore the function of the TAC on the manipulation of pollinator’s behaviours, single flowers from more than 60 individuals were randomly and evenly allocated in two groups: (1) the TAC was removed from flowers and (2) flowers were intact. Flowers of the two groups were then exposed to pollinators. During the process of pollinator visit on each flower, pollinator species and behaviours were observed. Whether the pollinator could push up the anther and touch the stigma was recorded as the effectiveness of each visit. The difference of pollination success of pollinators between the two groups was analyzed using a logistic model.
Evaluation on the sexual roles of the TAC
To evaluate the effect of the TAC on male fitness, single flowers from more than 60 individuals were randomly selected in 2011 and evenly allocated in two groups: (1) the TAC was removed from flowers and (2) flowers were intact. Each flower was bagged before anthesis and permitted one visit by pollinator after anthesis. Pollen grains left on the flower were then collected for pollen number count. A two–way ANOVA was used to test the difference of the remaining pollen between two groups, with factors of treatment, bee species and treatment × bee species considered. The data was under the reciprocally transformed to meet the normality. The average number of pollen grains left after a single visits by pollinators in intact flower group was Pi , while the number of pollen grains left in the flower group with anther crest removed was Pm . In addition, 30 floral buds were collected for total pollen number (Pt) counting. The contribution of TAC on male function (Cm) was then evaluated by pollen removal via equation (1):
To examine the effect of the TAC on female fitness, single flowers from more than 60 individuals were selected in 2011and allocated in two groups: (1) the TAC was removed from flowers and (2) flowers were intact. Flowers were manipulated in the early morning, tagged and open pollinated, which allowed flowers to be visited for numerous times during the entire flowering stage. Fruits were collected one month after pollination. The two treatments were repeated in 2012. The difference of fruit set between two groups was analyzed using a logistic model and the difference of seed number was analyzed using a two-way ANOVA. The average number of seeds in intact flower group was Si , while the number of seeds in the flower group with anther crest removed was Sm. The contribution of TAC on female fitness (Cf) was then evaluated by seed production via equation (2):
Unlike the evaluation on male function where flowers were permitted only one visit by bees, flowers during the evaluation on female function were open pollinated in the entire flowering and permitted multiple visits by pollinators. The manipulated flowers that were not pollinated at the first visit may get pollinated during following visits by bees and several effective visits by pollinators would be sufficient for the achievement of female fitness33. The estimation on female function of TAC is therefore more conservative than that on male function.
In this study, all the analyses were performed in R 3.02 for windows and data was expressed as mean ± standard error.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Fan, Y.-L. and Li, Q.-J. Tail-like anther crest aids pollination by manipulating pollinator's behaviour in a wild ginger. Sci. Rep. 6, 22340; doi: 10.1038/srep22340 (2016).
References
Darwin, C. The various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects. (John Murrary, 1877).
Harder, L. D. & Johnson, S. D. Darwin’s beautiful contrivances: evolutionary and functional evidence for floral adaptation. New Phytol. 183, 530–545, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02914.x (2009).
Dafni, A. & Kevan, P. G. Flower size and shape: implications in pollination. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 45, 201–211 (1997).
Kay, K. M. & Sargent, R. D. The role of animal pollination in plant speciation: integrating ecology, geography and genetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 637–656, doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120310 (2009).
Van der Niet, T., Peakall, R. & Johnson, S. D. Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: new evidence and future perspectives. Ann. Bot. 113, 199–211, doi: 10.1093/aob/mct290 (2014).
Dodd, M. E., Silvertown, J. & Chase, M. W. Phylogenetic analysis of trait evolution and species diversity variation among angiosperm families. Evolution 53, 732–744 (1999).
Walker-Larsen, J. & Harder, L. D. The evolution of staminodes in angiosperms: patterns of stamen reduction, loss and functional re-invention. Am. J. Bot. 87, 1367–1384 (2000).
Walker-Larsen, J. & Harder, L. D. Vestigial organs as opportunities for functional innovation: the example of the Penstemon staminode. Evolution 55, 477–487 (2001).
Zhang, L. et al. Phylogeny and Evolution of Bracts and Bracteoles in Tacca (Dioscoreaceae). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 53, 901–911, doi: 1672-9072(2011)53:11<901:paeoba>2.0.tx;2-s (2011).
Anderson, B., Cole, W. W. & Barrett, S. C. H. Specialized bird perch aids cross-pollination. Nature 435, 41–42, doi: 10.1038/435041a (2005).
Zhang, B. et al. Functional implications of the staminal lever mechanism in Salvia cyclostegia (Lamiaceae). Ann. Bot. 107, 621–628, doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr011 (2011).
Armstrong, J. E. Lever action anthers and the forcible shedding of pollen in Torenia (Scrophulariaceae). Am. J. Bot. 79, 34–40, doi: 10.2307/2445194 (1992).
Han, Y., Dai, C., Yang, C. F., Wang, Q. F. & Motley, T. J. Anther appendages of Incarvillea trigger a pollen-dispensing mechanism. Ann. Bot. 102, 473–479, doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn102 (2008).
Specht, C. D., Yockteng, R., Almeida, A. M., Kirchoff, B. K. & Kress, W. J. Homoplasy, pollination and emerging complexity during the evolution of floral development in the tropical gingers (Zingiberales). Bot. Rev. 78, 440–462, doi: 10.1007/s12229-012-9111-6 (2012).
Gao, J. Y., Sheng, C. L. & Yang, S. X. Adaptive significance of mass-flowering in Hedychium coccineum (Zingiberaceae). Biodivers. Sci. 20, 376–385 (2012).
Fletcher, T. & Son, S. A veterinary entomology for India, Part XIV. Indian J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Husb. 1, 192–199 (1931).
Fan, Y. L., Kress, W. J. & Li, Q. J. A new secondary pollen presentation mechanism from a wild ginger (Zingiber densissimum) and its functional roles in pollination process PLoS ONE 10, e0143812, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143812 (2015).
Simpson, B. B. & Neff, J. L. Floral rewards: alternatives to pollen and nectar. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68, 301–322, doi: 10.2307/2398800 (1981).
von Helversen, D. & von Helversen, O. Acoustic guide in bat-pollinated flower. Nature 398, 759–760 (1999).
Simon, R., Holderied, M. W., Koch, C. U. & von Helversen, O. Floral acoustics: conspicuous echoes of a dish-shaped leaf attract bat pollinators. Science 333, 631–633 (2011).
Ren, Z. X., Li, D. Z., Bernhardt, P. & Wang, H. Flowers of Cypripedium fargesii (Orchidaceae) fool flat-footed flies (Platypezidae) by faking fungus-infected foliage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 7478–7480 (2011).
Gegear, R. J. & Laverty, T. M. in Cognitive Ecology of Pollination: Animal Behavior and Floral Evolution ( eds Lars Chittka & James D. Thomson ) 1–20 (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
Darwin, C. The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. (John Murray, 1876).
Irwin, R. E. & Brody, A. K. Nectar-robbing bumble bees reduce the fitness of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Ecology 80, 1703–1712 (1999).
Irwin, R. E., Brody, A. K. & Waser, N. M. The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations and communities. Oecologia 129, 161–168 (2001).
Fan, Y. L. & Li, Q. J. Stigmatic fluid aids self-pollination in Roscoea debilis (Zingiberaceae): a new delayed selfing mechanism. Ann. Bot. 110, 969–975, doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs169 (2012).
Endress, P. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. (Cambridge University Press, 1994).
Buchmann, S. L., Jones, C. & Little, R. in Handbook of experimental pollination biology (eds C. E. Jones & R. J. Little ) 73–113 (Scientific and Academic Editions, 1983).
Beattie, A. J. Pollination mechanisms in Viola. New Phytol. 70, 343–360 (1971).
Augspurger, C. K. Mass-flowering of a tropical shrub (Hybanthus prunifolius): influence on pollinator attraction and movement. Evolution, 34, 475–488 (1980).
Hermann, P. M. & Palser, B. F. Stamen development in the Ericaceae. I. Anther wall, microsporogenesis, inversion and appendages. Am. J. Bot. 87, 934–957 (2000).
Maynard Smith, J. In Group selection (ed. C. G. William ) 163–175 (Aldine Altherton, 1971).
Bell, G. On the Function of Flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B: Biological Sciences 224, 223–265, doi: 10.1098/rspb.1985.0031 (1985).
Acknowledgements
We thank Professor Darong Yang for insect identification. This study is supported by the NSFC (U1202261 and 31070340), the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) 135 Programme (XTBGT01, F01) and a CSC scholarship from Chinese Scholarship Council (file No. 201304910290).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.L.F. and Q.J.L. designed the research and wrote the manuscript; Y.L.F. performed experiments, analyzed data and prepared the figures and tables.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Fan, YL., Li, QJ. Tail-like anther crest aids pollination by manipulating pollinator’s behaviour in a wild ginger. Sci Rep 6, 22340 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22340
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22340
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.