BKM-120 (Buparlisib): A Phosphatidyl-Inositol-3 Kinase Inhibitor with Anti-Invasive Properties in Glioblastoma

Abstract

Glioblastoma is an aggressive, invasive tumor of the central nervous system (CNS). There is a widely acknowledged need for anti-invasive therapeutics to limit glioblastoma invasion. BKM-120 is a CNS-penetrant pan-class I phosphatidyl-inositol-3 kinase (PI3K) inhibitor in clinical trials for solid tumors, including glioblastoma. We observed that BKM-120 has potent anti-invasive effects in glioblastoma cell lines and patient-derived glioma cells in vitro. These anti-migratory effects were clearly distinguishable from cytostatic and cytotoxic effects at higher drug concentrations and longer durations of drug exposure. The effects were reversible and accompanied by changes in cell morphology and pronounced reduction in both cell/cell and cell/substrate adhesion. In vivo studies showed that a short period of treatment with BKM-120 slowed tumor spread in an intracranial xenografts. GDC-0941, a similar potent and selective PI3K inhibitor, only caused a moderate reduction in glioblastoma cell migration. The effects of BKM-120 and GDC-0941 were indistinguishable by in vitro kinase selectivity screening and phospho-protein arrays. BKM-120 reduced the numbers of focal adhesions and the velocity of microtubule treadmilling compared with GDC-0941, suggesting that mechanisms in addition to PI3K inhibition contribute to the anti-invasive effects of BKM-120. Our data suggest the CNS-penetrant PI3K inhibitor BKM-120 may have anti-invasive properties in glioblastoma.

Introduction

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant glial brain tumor with an annual incidence of 3.5/100,000 in the US1. GBM is also one of the most lethal human cancers with 12–15 months median survival and 5-year survival of just 5%2. The current standard-of-care was established a decade ago and consists of maximal safe surgical resection followed by concomitant radio- and chemotherapy3.

Infiltration of normal brain parenchyma is a defining characteristic hallmark of GBM. These cells render GBM surgically incurable and 90% of patients develop new lesions within 2–3 cm of the primary tumor or at distant sites within the brain1. Moreover, invasion may be increased further by commonly used therapies including radiation and avastin4. At present, there are no anti-invasive drugs available clinically and this is a widely acknowledged clinical challenge. The identification of a CNS-penetrant anti-invasive drug may have an important clinical impact in GBM.

The phosphatidyl-inositol-3 kinase (PI3K) pathway is frequently deregulated in cancer1,5. PI3K is a lipid kinase that transduces growth-promoting extracellular signals and controls downstream effectors implicated in malignancy6,7. PI3K is activated in the majority of GBMs due to constitutive receptor tyrosine kinase activation as well as inactivating mutations/deletions of PTEN (33%) or activating PI3K mutations (17%)1,8,9. Small molecule PI3K inhibitors are under investigation in oncology clinical trials6.

BKM-120 (Buparlisib), a dimorpholino pyrimidine derivative, is an oral pan-class I PI3K inhibitor that penetrates the blood-brain barrier (BBB)6. It is in clinical trials for solid tumors including GBM and has anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects in GBM cell lines independent of PTEN or EGFR status10. BKM-120 selectively inhibits PI3K isoform α (PIK3CA) with an in vitro IC50 of 35 nM and inhibits other PI3K paralogs with an IC50 range of 108–348 nM6. BKM-120 induces a G2-M cell cycle arrest in vitro, blocks VEGF-induced neo-vascularization in vivo and its activity persists in the presence of activating PIK3CA mutations11. Off-target effects have been reported through direct binding of BKM-120 to tubulin causing microtubule polymerization12.

PI3K plays a role in cell migration in some cell types5,13. Therefore, because of the need for clinically applicable anti-invasive approaches in GBM and the fact that BKM-120 penetrates the BBB, we investigated its effects on GBM cell migration. We found that BKM-120 caused a dose-dependent, reversible blockade of GBM invasion and migration in vitro in GBM cell lines and glioma stem-like cells (GSCs). In vivo studies showed a marked reduction in invasive tumor spread in mice bearing orthotopic xenografts treated with BKM-120. Mechanistically, BKM-120 treatment led to a reduction in focal adhesions and microtubule treadmilling, which may contribute to its anti-migratory effects. These data suggest that BKM-120 is a candidate anti-invasive drug for GBM therapy.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and reagents

Glioma stem cell (GSC) lines G9, G33, G35, G146 and G157 were described previously14,15 and BT145 was obtained from the BWH Neuropathology core. All samples were collected according to IRB approved protocols and maintained as described16. U87 and U251 GBM cell lines and astrocytes were provided by ATCC (Manassas, VA), U1242 cells were a gift from Dr. James Van Brocklyn (The Ohio State University) and grown in DMEM (Life Technologies) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma-Aldrich) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. The isolation of the human fetal NSCs SCP27 (a kind gift from Dr Brian Kaspar, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH) were reported previously17. Copepod GFP (copGFP) marker protein was transduced using pCDH (System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA). Cells transfected with Paxillin-GFP (Addgene, 15223) and EB1-GFP (Addgene, 17234; provided by Dr Hiroshi Nakashima, Brigham and Women’s Hospital) plasmids were plated after 48 hours in Nunc™ Lab-Tek™ II Chambered Coverglass 8-well plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and treated with vehicle and drugs. BKM-120 and GDC-0941 were purchased from Selleckchem (Houston, TX).

Cell invasion and migration assays

For 3D spheroid cultures, 5,000 cells/well were cultured in Corning Ultra-Low Attachment Surface 96 well plates (Corning Inc., Corning, NY) in 100 μl medium. After 24 hours, the medium was replaced with 50 μl of collagen I (Advanced BioMatrix, Inc San Diego, CA, USA) and neutralized to pH 7.5 using 1N NaOH and supplemented with FCS, penicillin-streptomycin and 5 x DMEM. After polymerization, the collagen was overlaid with 50 μl of medium containing drug or vehicle. Wound-healing assays were performed as described16. Transwell assays were performed using 3 μm pore size fluoroblok inserts (Corning Inc., Corning, NY). Poly-ɛ-caprolactone nanofibers (Nanofiber Solutions, Columbus, OH) were prepared and quantitated as described18.

Cell viability, cell-substrate adhesion and cell-cell adhesion assays

Cell viability and proliferation were measured using PrestoBlue reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Cell-substrate adhesion assays were performed with adherent G9-copGFP cells in paired 96 well plates. Cells were treated with vehicle (DMSO) as control or BKM-120 using four replicates at each time point for each condition. Drug and vehicle were washed out every 30 min and replaced with fresh medium. One plate was used for microscopic observation; cells were fixed with 4% PFA, treated with 5% normal goat serum and 0.5% Triton-x-100 in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature and stained with DAPI. The second plate was used to evaluate cell-substrate adhesion with the CellTiter-Glo® Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell-cell adhesion was evaluated using a G9-copGFP single cell suspension treated with DMSO or BKM-120 and placed in a circular shaker in the cell incubator. At prefixed time-points 50 μl of each suspension was transferred to a 96-well plate and fixed with 4% PFA. Each experiment was performed in 4 replicates.

In vivo studies, drug and tissue preparation

2 × 105 G9-copGFP or U1242 cells were stereotactically injected into nude mouse brains (2 mm right lateral, 1 mm frontal to the bregma and 3 mm deep) as described15. A short timeline was chosen in order to show a clearer anti-invasive effect, therefore treatments started on day 4 and on the first day of injection three mice were sacrificed to show the tumors at time 0. Starting on day 7 for the G9-copGFP and day 4 for the U1242 post-implantation five mice per group were treated for four days by daily gavage with vehicle (NMP/PEG300, Sigma-Aldrich), 2 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg of BKM-120. Brains were harvested on day 10 (G9-copGFP) and on day 7 (U1242), placed in 4% PFA for 24 hours, followed by 30% sucrose for 48 hours and frozen. Sections (30 μm) were blocked with 5% donkey serum/0.5% TX100/ PBS for 1 hour at room temperature, followed by Vimentin SP20 (1:200 O/N, ab16700 Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and Hoechst 33342 staining (1:3000, H3570 Life Technology, Grand Island, NY, USA). BKM-120 was formulated in NMP/PEG300 (10/90). Solutions were freshly prepared on each day of dosing by dissolving the drug first in NMP and then by adding the remaining volume of PEG300. The human equivalent dose (HED) of BKM-120 was calculated according to the US Food and Drug Administration method previously described by Shannon et al.19,20.

Microscopy

Nikon Eclipse Ti, Nikon TE2000 and Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope systems with on-stage incubators for live cell imaging were used. Data were edited/quantified using ImageJ (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/), Microsoft Excel and Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).

Statistical analysis

Two sample t tests (adjusted with Bonferroni’s method), one-way and two-way ANOVA (Greenhouse-Geisser correction) were used. IC50 value was calculated as the drug concentration required to reach an inhibitory effect of 50% compared to the vehicle control.

Results

BKM-120 inhibits GBM spheroid invasion in a dose-dependent manner

PI3K has been previously linked to cell migration in several studies5,13 and is a major oncogenic signaling molecule in GBM1,5. Initially, we examined the effects of the CNS-penetrant selective class I PI3K inhibitor BKM-120 in 3D spheroid invasion assays on a panel of GBM cell lines, including low passage GSCs, neural stem cells and astrocytes (Fig. 1A, Supplementary Fig. 1A). BKM-120 inhibited GBM spheroid invasion in a dose-dependent manner, with a significant blockade observed at 1–2 μM (Fig. 1A). Invasion was inhibited by at least 50% in all cell lines at 2 μM (Fig. 1B) and in highly sensitive cell lines (G9, U251, G157, G146 and U1242) invasion was strongly blocked at this concentration (>90% inhibition). Figure 1C shows a clear blockade of invasion in G9-copGFP cells treated with 2 μM BKM-120 over 48 hours. Cell proliferation assays showed that across the cell line panel the IC50 values for cell viability were higher than those for invasion, confirming the ability of BKM-120 to specifically inhibit GBM invasion (Fig. 1D, Supplementary Fig. 1A).

Figure 1
figure1

BKM-120 inhibits invasion in a dose-dependent manner in GBM cell lines.

(A) The graph represents an average of the effects of BKM-120 on nine different GBM cell lines and GSCs. (B) Effect of increasing concentrations of BKM-120 in spheroid invasion assays in a panel of GBM cell lines. Invasion was measured after 48 hours of BKM-120 treatment and is expressed as sphere area as a percentage of controls. (C) Image of G9 spheroids after treatment with 2 μM BKM-120 (bar = 100 μm) (lower panel) compared with controls (upper panel). (D) Invasion (blue) and cell viability (red) IC50 values for BKM-120. IC50 was calculated using data from a range of BKM-120 concentrations. Measurements were obtained at 48h of treatment. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (****p < 0.0001).

BKM-120 inhibits GBM cell migration in multiple in vitro assays and its effects are reversible

We then investigated the effects of BKM-120 on GBM cell migration in a range of additional in vitro migration assays. Wound-healing “scratch” assays confirmed that BKM-120 significantly inhibited GBM cell migration in a dose-dependent manner in U251 and G9 cells (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Fig. 2A) at similar concentrations to those observed in spheroid assays. We then examined the effect of BKM-120 on GBM cell migration on aligned nanofiber scaffolds, which we previously developed as a topographic substrate for cell migration18. Cell migration was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner in multiple cell lines similar to above (Supplementary Fig. 2B) and was strongly inhibited at 2 μM BKM-120 (Fig. 2B). Importantly, using the nanofiber assay we confirmed that the effects of BKM-120 were not due to irreversible cytotoxicity; a drug wash-out experiment performed after 48h treatment with 1 μM BKM-120 (Supplementary Fig. 2C,D) and 2 μM BKM-120 showed that the anti-migratory effects of BKM-120 were reversible (Fig. 2B). Transwell assays performed on U251-copGFP (Fig. 2C) and G9-copGFP cells at the initial time-point (6 hours) and at later time-points (24 and 48 hours, data not shown) showed a similar block of migration. In summary, these data demonstrate that BKM-120 potently and reversibly inhibits migration in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, cell morphology changes induced by BKM-120 observed during the nanofiber experiment were confirmed in U251-copGFP cells treated with 1 μM BKM-120, in which cells became completely rounded up after 24 hours (Fig. 2D).

Figure 2
figure2

Impact of BKM-120 on GBM cell migration and morphology.

(A) Time-lapse images of U251-GFP GBM cells in wound-healing assays performed on U251-copGFP with increasing concentrations of BKM-120 (0.5, 1 and 2 μM) over 48 h. Controls were treated with DMSO. The gap is indicated by double arrows and the migration index was measured as total area of the gap (bar = 100 μm). (B) Time course over 72 hours on nanofiber scaffolds of G9-copGFP GBM cells treated with DMSO or BKM-120 (2 μM). The wash out performed at 48 hours demonstrates recovery of cell migration after drug removal. The lower graph indicates percentage of migration index compared to controls at 72 hours (100%) (bar = 100 μm). (C) Dose-dependent effect of BKM-120 on U251 GBM cells in transwell assays after 6 hours. The images show the ImageJ generated masks used to quantify the cell migration. Cell viability assays were performed on the same cells at the same time point using PrestoBlue. (D) Cell morphology. Time course of U251-copGFP GBM cell shape changes after treatment with 2 μM BKM-120 (bar = 50 μm). The graph indicates the percentage of total area compared to time 0h at 6, 12 and 24 hours (100%) (bar = 100 μm). One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).

BKM-120 blocks GBM cell-adhesion

We then investigated the impact of BKM-120 on GBM cell-substrate and cell-cell adhesion in vitro. Cell-substrate adhesion in G9-copGFP cells was significantly inhibited by 2 μM BKM-120 and confirmed by microscopic imaging after 200 min (p = 0.009) (Fig. 3A). Cell-cell adhesion was measured using an aggregation assay in suspension culture, by setting three size ranges and counting the number of cell clusters in each specific range dimension. This assay therefore allows discrimination between aggregates of different size. At time 0 all the cell clusters, both in control or BKM-120 treated samples, have a size <3000 μm, indicating small cell-cell aggregates and single cells. After 160 min, 10% of control cells had formed aggregates with size in the 3000–6000 μm range, whereas all of the BKM-120 treated cells remained in the smaller range (p < 0.001). This pattern continued over the full time course of the experiment (Fig. 3B). Taken together these data demonstrate that BKM-120 blocks cell-substrate and cell-cell adhesion suggesting it affects the ability of cells to form robust contacts.

Figure 3
figure3

BKM-120 reduces GBM cell adhesion, focal adhesions and microtubule dynamics.

(A) Cell-substrate adhesion was evaluated using G9-copGFP GSCs as described in Materials and Methods. Measurements were taken as luminescence output, RLU (relative light units), every 20 minutes over a time course of 200 minutes. The lower panel shows DAPI staining of G9-copGFP GSCs at the final time-point (200 min, bar = 500 μm). (B) Cell-cell adhesion in G9-copGFP GSCs. Sphere dimensions are indicated as a percentage relative to controls at the indicated time-points. The sphere dimension range is color coded in red for <3000 μm (1), green for 3000 - 6000 μm (2) and violet > 6000 μm (3). (C) Left panel: spheroid invasion assay on G9-copGFP GSCs with 2 μM of BKM-120 and a range of GDC-0941 concentrations. Invasion was measured after 48 hours and is expressed as percentage of spheroid area compared to controls. Right panel: Akt phosphorylation levels were measured by Western blot after 30 minutes treatment with 2 μM of BKM-120 or GDC-0941. (D) U251-paxillin-GFP images (bar = 20 μm) and U251-EB1-GFP time-lapse (bar = 10 μm) at 24h after DMSO, BKM-120 or GDC-0941 treatment. The total area of the paxillin-GFP signal and the velocity (microns/sec) of EB1 were measured using ImageJ. Each measurement was made in triplicate. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).

PI3K-independent effects of BKM-120 contribute to the migratory phenotype

We then investigated the anti-invasive effects of another potent selective PI3K inhibitor, GDC-094121, that is in phase I clinical studies for advanced solid tumors22. This showed a modest effect on cell invasion compared with BKM-120 even though PI3K inhibition was stronger after GDC-0941 treatment as shown by Akt phosphorylation (Fig. 3C). GDC-0941 did not fully block migration even at concentrations as high as 10 μM (Fig. 3C), cell-substrate adhesion in the presence of 2 μM GDC-0941 was not significantly altered compared with controls (data not shown, p = 0.1) and was significantly less compared with BKM-120 (p = 0.009). In vitro kinase selectivity profiling revealed no significant differences between BKM-120 and GDC-0941 in a panel of 140 protein kinases and 15 lipid kinases (Supplementary Table 1). Similarly, we did not see any differences between the effects of either drug in an ELISA-based array of 39 major phospho-proteins (Supplementary Figure 3A). In fact, our Western blotting data suggests that GDC-0941 has a stronger inhibitory effect on PI3K than BKM-120. Overall, these data suggest that PI3K inhibition alone is not sufficient to block glioblastoma cell migration.

To better understand these observations and the potential PI3K-independent effects of BKM-120, we examined the previously described potential effects of BKM-120 on microtubules12. In U251 cells, after 24 hours of BKM-120, the cells became rounded up with possible damage to the microtubule cytoskeleton (Fig. 3D). To further examine microtubule behavior we used U251 and U1242 cells expressing EB1-GFP. EB1 preferentially localizes to the plus-ends of growing microtubules and is pro-migratory in GBM23. A time-lapse study revealed a reduction in microtubule dynamics as indicated by EB1 trafficking after BKM-120 treatment, compared to a modest effect of GDC-0941 (Fig. 3D and Supplementary 3B). Due to the effects on cell adhesion observed above, we also investigated the effects of BKM-120 and GDC-0941 on focal adhesions using U251 cells expressing a paxillin-GFP fusion. This showed that 2 μM BKM-120 completely eliminated focal adhesions after 24 hours, whereas GDC-0941 had a much less pronounced effect (Fig. 3D). These data suggest that the effects of BKM-120 on the inhibition of GBM invasion and migration could be due to off-target effects on focal adhesions and microtubule dynamics.

BKM-120 reduces GBM tumor spread in vivo in orthotopic xenografts

The effect of BKM-120 in vivo was examined using two orthotopic xenograft models. We performed a 10 day treatment in G9-copGFP cells and a 7 day study in U1242 cells. The G9-copGFP tumor-bearing mice (5 for each group) were treated with vehicle and BKM-120 20 mg/kg (Supplementary Fig. 3D). The U1242 tumor-bearing mice (5 for each group) were treated with vehicle and 2 different concentrations of BKM-120, 2 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg, corresponding to a human equivalent dose (HED) of 1.62 mg/kg and 0.16 mg/kg respectively (Fig. 4B). The tumor perimeter was measured after the treatments at day 7 and and the average tumor size was normalized to day 4 showing a strong and dose-dependent effect of BKM-120 in vivo (Fig. 4A). Microscopic analysis of tumor sections revealed a marked difference in tumor distribution compared with vehicle-treated control mice and high magnification analysis of tumors revealed a well-defined tumor/normal brain interface after treatment and reduced migration (Fig. 4B and supplementary Fig. 3D).

Figure 4
figure4

BKM-120 treatment blocks glioma growth and invasion in vivo.

To analyze the effects of BKM-120 in vivo, we injected U1242 cells intracranially in nude mice and treated them daily with 2 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg of BKM-120 by gavage. (A) Average of the the tumors perimeters measured at day 7 and corrected for the averages of the size of the tumors at day 4. (B) Tumor spread was examined using Vimentin and DAPI staining. Photographs illustrate tumor growth (low resolution, bar = 1 mm) and the tumor normal brain interface indicating the degree of invasion (high resolution, bar = 20 μm). One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

Thus, BKM-120 has anti-invasive properties that alongside BBB penetration may render this a useful molecule for limiting GBM invasion. These effects are not mediated completely by PI3K inhibition and future mechanistic studies will investigate the additional targets involved in these effects.

Discussion

Our study shows that the CNS-penetrant PI3K inhibitor BKM-120 is a candidate anti-invasive drug for GBM treatment. BKM-120 inhibited invasion in vitro in a panel of GBM cell lines, in a range of assays and this was not associated with cytotoxic effects. Moreover, BKM-120 is also able to inhibit invasion in neural stem cells and astrocytes at different concentrations, confirming the presence of common migratory mechanisms between cancer and normal cell lines. In vivo we were able to show reduced invasion in G9-copGFP and U1242 GBM cells after treatment with BKM-120.

PI3K isoforms have multiple roles in cell migration and, in particular, class IA and class IB subtypes are activated by, interact with and contribute to activation of integrins and FAK24,25. However, all our GBM cell lines express PI3Kα and β isoforms and mostly all the others (Supplementary Fig. 4) and the effects of BKM-120 are likely to be directly on cell migration processes as opposed to invasion/remodelling, as the drug was equally as effective at blocking invasion in the presence and absence of matrix. The PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is activated by loss or mutation of the PTEN tumor suppressor. Previous papers support the PTEN-independence of the effects of BKM-120 on cell proliferation in vitro10,11. We also did not observe any correlation between BKM-120 and PTEN mutations (Supplementary Fig. 4). Most importantly in terms of the goal of this study, which was to investigate the potential of BKM-120 as an anti-invasive drug, orthotopic xenografts demonstrated a reduction in tumor spread and were less invasive after BKM-120 treatment. It should be noted that unequivocal monitoring of anti-invasive effects is challenging under conditions where growth is also slightly inhibited, as alterations in tumor metabolism in rapidly growing tumors may promote invasion26. In addition, BKM-120 treated tumors clearly show a more defined tumor/brain interface, which strongly supports our in vitro observations. Moreover, in contrast to high BKM-120 dose used for in vivo experiment by previous papers10,12,27, our experiments were performed using the mouse equivalent of the current maximum tolerated doses used in patients and a 10-times less concentrated dose.

Clinical trial data on recurrent GBM treated with BKM-120 are not yet published, but invasion was not part of these studies, so is unlikely to have been addressed in patients. Combination studies of BKM-120 may be critical to investigate its anti-invasive potential in human patients. It is of interest that a clinical trial is underway combining BKM-120 with avastin (NCT01349660). In the context of this combination, potential anti-invasive effects of BKM-120 may be addressed.

Interestingly, experiments with the similar PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941 showed that the effects of BKM-120 may be only partially mediated via PI3K inhibition. BKM-120, but not GDC-0941, strongly blocked invasion and potently induced alterations in cell morphology, microtubule dynamics and eliminated focal adhesions. Further experiments are necessary to better understand direct and off-target effects of BKM-120 and to determine their relative contribution to the anti-migratory effects observed and whether these are additive or synergistic with PI3K inhibition. Our data seems to indicate a direct effect on microtubule stability as previously observed12, given that the general structure of the microtubule network seems to be altered in our cells under conditions that block migration, however further experiments are necessary to elucidate the exact mechanism. EB1 tracking of microtubule plus ends revealed potential effects on microtubule dynamics. This may be related to the enhanced effect of BKM-120 on focal adhesions compared with GDC-0941. Others have established a link between microtubules and focal adhesion regulation, which may be relevant to our observations24,25,28. The differential effects of BKM-120 and GDC-0941 on GBM invasion suggest that class I PI3K functions in GBM migration, but also that class I PI3K inhibition alone is not sufficient to fully block cell motility. However, given that both BKM-120 and GDC-0941 are pan-class I inhibitors and we found a partial effect of PI3K on cell migration, further experiments will be necessary to underline the importance of each isoform and test them generating a drugs resistant allele29. There is data showing that Src30 and Akt kinases6 play a role in glioblastoma invasion. Although Src inhibition blocks migration in our cell line panel (data not shown), we did not see any changes in Src activation in the phospho-ELISA assay (Supplementary Fig. 3) which we have confirmed by Western blotting (data not shown). The observation that GDC-0941 does not block migration would rule out a role for Akt in our observations on GBM migration.

Overall, these support the important role of the off-target and direct effects of BKM-120 that are not yet fully defined. It is likely that further global profiling studies may uncover additional protein or lipid kinases that could underlie these observations. At present, the nature of the effects which may be involved in mediating some of the effects of BKM-120 is not clear, therefore elucidation of the underlying mechanism is of importance and may lead to the development of improved anti-invasive approaches.

In summary, the CNS-penetrant drug BKM-120 is able to inhibit GBM cell invasion in vitro and in vivo and its potential anti-invasive properties should be investigated clinically in GBM and potentially other invasive tumor types. Further studies are necessary to completely define additional targets of BKM-120.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Speranza, M.-C. et al. BKM-120 (Buparlisib): A Phosphatidyl-Inositol-3 Kinase Inhibitor with Anti-Invasive Properties in Glioblastoma. Sci. Rep. 6, 20189; doi: 10.1038/srep20189 (2016).

References

  1. Cloughesy, T. F., Cavenee, W. K. & Mischel, P. S. Glioblastoma: From Molecular Pathology to Targeted Treatment. Annu Rev Pathol. 9, 1–25 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ostrom, Q. T. et al. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2007–2011. Neurooncol. 16, 1–63 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stupp, R. et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 987–96 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McCarty, J. H. Glioblastoma resistance to anti-VEGF therapy: Has the challenge been MET? Clin. Cancer Res. 9, 1631–33 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunn, G. P. et al. Emerging insights into the molecular and cellular basis of glioblastoma. Genes Dev. 15, 756–84 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wen, P. Y., Lee, E. Q., Reardon, D. A., Ligon, K. L. & Alfred Yung, W. K. Current clinical development of PI3K pathway inhibitors in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 14, 819–29 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodon, J. et al. Phase I dose-escalation and -expansion study of buparlisib (BKM120), an oral pan-Class I PI3K inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest. New Drugs. 32, 670–81 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brennan, C. W. et al. The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma. Cell. 155, 462–77 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bleeker, F. E. et al. Mutational profiling of kinases in glioblastoma. BMC Cancer. 14, 718 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wachsberger, P. R. et al. Hsp90 inhibition enhances PI-3 kinase inhibition and radiosensitivity in glioblastoma. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 140, 573–82 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koul, D. et al. Antitumor activity of NVP-BKM120-A selective pan class I PI3 kinase inhibitor showed differential forms of cell death based on p53 status of glioma cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 184–95 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brachmann, S. M. et al. Characterization of the Mechanism of Action of the Pan Class I PI3K Inhibitor NVP-BKM120 across a Broad Range of Concentrations. Mol Cancer Ther. 11, 1747–57 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cain, R. J. & Ridley, A. J. Phosphoinositide 3-kinases in cell migration. Biol. Cell. Biol. 101, 13–29 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mao, P. et al. Mesenchymal glioma stem cells are maintained by activated glycolytic metabolism involving aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 8644–9 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams, S. P. et al. Indirubins decrease glioma invasion by blocking migratory phenotypes in both the tumor and stromal endothelial cell compartments. Cancer Res. 71, 5374–80 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nowicki, M. O. et al. Lithium inhibits invasion of glioma cells; possible involvement of glycogen synthase kinase-3. Neuro. Oncol. 10, 690–9 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peruzzi, P. et al. MicroRNA-128 coordinately targets Polycomb Repressor Complexes in glioma stem cells. Neuro Oncol. 15, 1212–24 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Agudelo-Garcia, P. A. et al. Glioma Cell Migration on Three-dimensional Nanofiber Scaffolds Is Regulated by Substrate Topography and Abolished by Inhibition of STAT3 Signaling 1,2. Neoplasia. 13, 831–40 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shannon, R. S., Minakshi, N. & Nihal, A. Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited. FASEB J. 22, 659–661 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research & Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Estimating the safe starting dose in clinical trials for therapeutics in adult healthy volunteers. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Rockville, Maryland, USA (2002).

  21. Folkes, A. J. et al. The identification of 2-(1H-indazol-4-yl)-6-(4-methanesulfonyl-piperazin-1-ylmethyl)-4-morpholin-4-yl-thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine (GDC-0941) as a potent, selective, orally bioavailable inhibitor of class I PI3 kinase for the treatment of cancer. J. Med. Chem. 51, 5522–32 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sarker, D. et al. First-in-human phase I study of pictilisib (GDC-0941), a potent pan-class I phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 21, 77–86 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Berges, R. et al. End-binding 1 protein overexpression correlates with glioblastoma progression and sensitizes to Vinca -alkaloids in vitro and in vivo. Oncotarget. 5, 12769–87 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ginsberg, M. H., Partridge, A. & Shattil, S. J. Integrin regulation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17, 509–16 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sulzmaier F. J., Jean, C. & Schlaepfer D. D. FAK in cancer: mechanistic findings and clinical applications. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 14, 598–610 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Robertson-Tessi, M., Gillies, R. J., Gatenby, R. A. & Anderson A. R. Impact of metabolic heterogeneity on tumor growth, invasion and treatment outcomes. Cancer Res. 75, 1567–79 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. El Meskini, R. et al. A preclinical orthotopic model for glioblastoma recapitulates key features of human tumors and demonstrates sensitivity to a combination of MEK and PI3K pathway inhibitors. Dis. Model. Mech. 3, 652–62 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yue, J. et al. Microtubules regulate focal adhesion dynamics through MAP4K4. Dev. Cell. 31, 572–85 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zunder, E. R., Knight Z. A., Houseman B. T., Apsel, B. & Shokat, K. M. Discovery of drug-resistant and drug-sensitizing mutations in the oncogenic PI3K isoform p110 alpha. Cancer Cell. 14, 80–92 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ahluwalia, M., Groot, J., Liu, W. & Gladson, C. L. Targeting SRC in glioblastoma tumors and brain metastases: rationale and preclinical studies. Cancer Lett. 298, 139–49 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NCI (RO1CA166172) and was supported through funding for theDFCI/BWH Translational Neurooncology Core from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.-C.S. performed and designed the majority of experiments in this paper and wrote the mansucript C.-F.C. assisted with imaging and several experiments M.O. assisted with migration experiments and designed the muti-well platform for these experiments P.B. designed and performed immunostaining experiments E.A.C. designed and interpreted experiments S.E.L. designed and interpreted all experiments and wrote the manuscript. All authors read, edited and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Speranza, MC., Nowicki, M., Behera, P. et al. BKM-120 (Buparlisib): A Phosphatidyl-Inositol-3 Kinase Inhibitor with Anti-Invasive Properties in Glioblastoma. Sci Rep 6, 20189 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20189

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing