Introduction

The phenomenon of synchronization among coupled oscillators is fairly ubiquitous in natural and manmade systems. Examples in biology include the synchronized flashing of fireflies1, the chirping of crickets2, cardiac pacemakers3, yeast cells4 and the firing of neurons5. In social systems coherence occurs in cooperative crowd effects6,7, while in non-living physical systems synchronization is seen, for example, in arrays of Josephson junctions8 and semiconductor lasers9. Last, but not least, systems of coupled chemical reactions10 provide representative examples in chemistry.

Precise characterizations of synchronization have been made through analytical considerations (phase models based on the Kuramoto-family of models11), while coupled electrochemical oscillators12, reactors13 and well-mixed populations of catalyst-loaded oscillatory beads have proven to be excellent experimental templates14. The latter is particularly interesting, being scaleable to a large population and known to have a panoply of dynamical behaviors ranging from phase synchronization15 to amplitude-entrainment through external driving16 to quorum sensing effects17.

Because of their rich phenomenology, systems of globally coupled beads provide an ideal setting to investigate potentially new dynamical behavior. In particular, there are few experimental instances demonstrating non-trivial dynamics beyond the synchronization transition, with the notable exception being oscillator death18 where an initially synchronized population abruptly ceases oscillations with increased coupling strength. Furthermore, while a large amount of effort has been dedicated to examining transitions to synchronization, relatively little is known about the potential existence of multiple states of synchronization. Examples abound in nature, such as the observation that the frequency of synchronized crickets adjusts according to the ambient temperature2. In neurology, pathologies are known to occur due to abnormal synchronization in pyramidal neuronal cells, so called Interictal Epileptogenic Discharges19. These, however, are distinct states of synchronization from epileptic seizures which are global high amplitude patterns found in EEG recordings20 occurring when globally connected groups of neurons communicate (through spatial transfer of neurotransmitters) with a faster time-scale than that of neural oscillations21.

Here we report on our results in the search of multiple synchronized states in a large population of beads loaded with ferroin () as a catalyst and immersed in a catalyst-free Belousov-Zhabotinsky (BZ) solution22. Our experimental setup, described in16 and SOM Sec. S1, consists of a continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR), where beads are immersed in the reaction mixture which is then stirred at different rates to adjust their interconnectivity via transport-facilitation of signaling species. A RedOx cycle occurs through the oxidization of ferroin by reagents in the solution resulting in the production of an autocatalyst activator and an inhibitor . The oxidized ferroin reacts with the solution regenerating the reduced form of the catalyst and the inhibitor, with the cycle repeating itself when the latter falls below a particular threshold. A combination of the stirring rate and bead density represents the coupling strength; if one fixes the latter, then the former plays the role of the control parameter in our system.

Results

The resulting collective state was measured through the RedOx potential. In Fig. 1 we plot our experimental results. Panel a shows the temporal evolution of the signal with increasing stirring rate in a single experiment with fixed bead density. Two distinct regimes are present: for lower stirring rates (K = 900 rpm) one observes low-amplitude high-frequency oscillations (green curve) corresponding to the well-known collective synchronization of the bead oscillations15. As one samples the strong coupling regime by increasing the rate (K = 1400 rpm) there is a sudden and abrupt emergence of large-amplitude and lower-frequency oscillations (blue curve). This new regime is in sharp contrast to the expected dynamics in this regime which was thought to support the existence of a quiescent state (so-called oscillator death)18.

In panels b and c we plot the period and amplitude of oscillations as a function of the stirring rate for the same bead density. Each data point is an average of multiple realizations of the experiment for a given stirring rate up to a maximum of 1500 rpm (which is the limit of our experimental apparatus). Both figures confirm the existence of two distinct synchronization regimes separated by a sharp jump transition in both period (50% increase) and amplitude (25% increase) prompting us to term the blue region as a super-synchronized state or mobbing state, similar to an equivalent phenomenon in sociology7.

In order to check the robustness of this effect we conducted several experiments for multiple combinations of stirring rate and bead density. The results are compiled in the “phase” diagram shown in Fig. 1d where each point corresponds to multiple realizations of experiments conducted for a fixed pair of density and stirring values. The characteristic time evolution of the RedOx potential in each region shown in Fig. 1e allowed us to demarcate three distinct dynamical behaviors of the system. In addition to the green and blue states one also observes a globally quiescent state (red curve and points) at low bead density and high stirring. Intriguingly the figure suggests that the large amplitude blue state can be accessed directly from the quiescent red state either through an increase in density or—for a relatively narrower region of parameter space—an increase in the stirring rate. That is to say, while the strong coupling regime leads to oscillator death (as previously established), still stronger coupling leads to the emergence of the reported mobbing state.

A representative example is shown in Fig. 1f where we plot the time evolution of the RedOx potential for three different stirring rates in the same experiment. The three regimes are clearly visible with the green and blue states now separated by an intermediate red state. Indeed, the boundary separating the quiescent and high-frequency oscillatory regimes is reminiscent of a quorum sensing transition as previously reported in17. The transition from the red state to the blue state is even more dramatic—the system directly transitions from a steady state to that with large amplitude oscillations—and may be considered a hyper quorum sensing effect.

Insight into the unusual dynamical behavior of the system can be gleaned via the simulation of an idealized numerical model17—based on the three-variable oregonator model23—that best approximates our experimental setup. Here, for each bead , the concentration values for is denoted Xi, Yi for and Zi for the oxidized catalyst. The Xi evolve according to,

where fi(Xi, Yi, Zi) represents the chemical reactions localized on the beads, Kex accounts for their information exchange rate with the surrounding solution, whose concentration Xs evolves according to Eq. S2 which also includes a density parameter. (For details see SOM Sec. S2). Synchronization in the system can be measured through the absolute value of the complex quantity

where ϕj is the phase of the j,th oscillator and Φ that of the synchronized fraction11. In Fig. 2 we plot our results. Panel a shows the order parameter r as a function of density ρ and exchange coupling Kex. The figure distinguishes between two regimes, a quiescent state (r = 0) and a synchronized state (r ≠ 0) but provides no information about any difference in dynamical behavior within the latter regime. On the other hand, consistent with the experimental observations in Fig. 1b,c, the amplitude A and period T of oscillations for , shown in 2b,c clearly demarcates the synchronized region into two different dynamical states separated by an abrupt jump transition in both quantities at the same (ρ, Kex) boundary.

The combined information in panels a through c can be displayed as a single phase diagram (Fig. 2d) that shows the different dynamical regions. The experimentally relevant ones are color coded the same as in Fig. 1 with the characteristic time evolution of the concentration shown as insets. Just as in the experiments, three dynamical regimes co-exist: a low amplitude high frequency synchronized state (green) at intermediate exchange rates and densities; a quiescent state (red) exists at high exchange rate but low densities; and finally a large amplitude, low frequency state (blue) at high densities and a wide range of exchange rates.

While the existence of the red and green states has been previously mapped out17, the unusual appearance of the blue state can be understood in the context of the flow of autocatalyst between the medium and the beads. In Fig. 2e we plot as a function of ρ and . For a wide swathe of parameter space the flow is negative, indicating a greater concentration of in the medium than in the beads. This difference asymptotically decreases as one traverses phases space from the red to the green state but vanishes abruptly—once again through a jump transition—as the blue state is accessed.

The time evolutions of Xs and in the red, green and blue regions plotted in Fig. 2f through h make this effect more apparent. Both the red and green states are characterized on average by lower concentrations in beads than in the medium, with the main difference being the appearance of oscillations in Fig. 2g. In Fig. 2h, however, the signals for the medium and the bead are practically indistinguishable suggesting an identical phase, period and nearly identical amplitudes.

Thus the primary difference between the green and blue states is the following: in the former case beads synchronize among each other and as the coupling increases eventually reach a state of full or complete synchronization with each other, sharing a common phase, frequency and amplitude. In this regime, as suggested by Fig. 2g, the dynamics of the medium is distinct from that of the beads immersed in it. However, as the coupling is further increased, in the latter case, there is a second dynamical transition where the already perfectly synchronized beads now also synchronize with the background medium with a common dynamical signature. To distinguish between the well-known complete synchronization state and the newly observed second dynamical transition reported here, we term the blue state a super-synchronized or mobbing state reflecting the strong harmony among the fully synchronized beads with the medium they are immersed in and whose active role is crucial for reaching this state.

Discussion

To summarize, we document the existence of a novel dynamical state in a population of coupled discrete chemical oscillators. This super-synchronized or mobbing state—characterized by large amplitude, low frequency oscillations—resides in the strong coupling limit (as measured by information exchange and oscillator density), a particularly surprising result, given the conventional wisdom of a complete cessation of oscillations in this regime. The detailed study of an idealized numerical model suggests the origin of this new mobbing state is a result of the interplay between the dynamics of the beads and the medium in which they are immersed. Specifically, the super-synchronized state is accessible only when the flow of signaling species (autocatalyst) between the beads and the medium is minimized, a condition one can achieve either by increasing the density of oscillators, the exchange rate or indeed both.

The dynamical interplay between the oscillators, the medium and the rate of information exchange is reminiscent of global coherence phenomena in neurology such as in epilepsy or mobbing crowds in social networks7. Indeed, the abruptness of the super-synchronization transition may have implications in biology where synchronization plays an important role in many contexts, including the cell cycle24 and cooperative behavior in bacterial cell colonies25. In addition, the system reaches a high level of self-organization as a consequence of the participation of the medium in the process of oscillator synchronization, brought about by the strong coupling between oscillators. Of course, this behavior is analogous to the so-called mobbing behavior found in hyper-communicated social media when the individuals not only have access to their immediate neighbors but they communicate with distant neighbors via social media.

We also note that the degree of information exchange between the oscillators (coupling strength) serves as a “switch” to access the different states and their regimes, suggesting intriguing engineering applications in similar physical systems. Finally our description may serve as a template to explain some natural phenomena such as the observation that the frequency of synchronized chirps in grasshoppers increases with temperature2.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Ghoshal, G. et al. Emergence of a super-synchronized mobbing state in a large population of coupled chemical oscillators. Sci. Rep. 6, 19186; doi: 10.1038/srep19186 (2016).