Abstract
Ti implants are good candidates in bone repair. However, how to promote bone formation on their surface and their consequent perfect integration with the surrounding tissue is still a challenge. To overcome such challenge, we propose to form Ti nanorods on their surface to promote the new bone formation around the implants. Here Ti nanorod arrays (TNrs) with different densities were produced on pure Ti surfaces using an anodizing method. The influence of TNr density on the protein adsorption as well as on the adhesion, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblastic cells were assessed. The TNrs were also implanted into the bone defects in rabbits to test their application in promoting bone formation and osteointegration at the implant-bone interface. TNrs with the medium density were found to show the best capability in promoting the protein adsorption from surrounding medium, which in turn efficiently enhanced osteogenic differentiation in vitro and osteointegration in vivo. Our work suggests that growing TNrs with a medium density on the surface of traditional Ti implants is an efficient and facile method for promoting bone formation and osteointegration in bone repair.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Ti and its alloys have been used as standard bone implants in bone repair due to their light weight1,2,3, chemical stability4,5,6,7 and easy processing8. However, as an inert non-biological material9,10,11, Ti cannot efficiently promote new bone formation on the implant surface, which is required for good integration with the surrounding bone tissue. Recently, it has been found that surface topography could facilitate the cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation12,13,14,15. Inspired from this fact, we hypothesize that a Ti implant modified with the appropriate osteogenic nanostructures will promote the osteointegration by enhancing bone formation around the implant. To test such hypothesis, here we grew Ti nanorod arrays (TNrs) with different surface densities on the surface of Ti implants and evaluated whether the TNrs could promote the bone formation in vitro and in vivo for achieving osteointegration (Fig. 1).
Results and Discussion
Characterization of TNrs
TNrs with tunable density and consistent chemical constitution were fabricated via anodization16 by controlling reaction time. Specifically, they were prepared by applying a constant current of 200 mA over the time period of 10–130 min (Fig. S1) in the electrolyte of a mixture of 1.45 wt% NH4F and 1.93 wt% H2C2O4 at room temperature. By controlling the anodization time for 15, 20 and 40 min, we prepared three samples with the average density of (0.88 ± 0.02) × 1010/cm2 (low-density TNr, LTNr), (1.79 ± 0.04) × 1010 /cm2 (medium-density TNr, MTNr) and (4.51 ± 0.06) × 1010 /cm2 (high-density TNr, HTNr), respectively (Fig. 2c). The density of TNrs was calculated by counting the number of nanorods in 500 nm2 of six random areas on SEM images. The length and diameter of TNrs were about 100 and 20 nm, respectively, which were calculated by averaging 20 random TNrs on SEM images using the SEM software.
The roughness of TNrs was calculated by AFM as 32.84 ± 0.64 nm (Ti, the control without nanorods), 17.02 ± 0.44 nm (LTNr), 23.18 ± 1.24 nm (MTNr) and 15.60 ± 1.17 nm (HTNr), respectively (Fig. 2d). The roughness was measured and calculated by averaging the data from 4 randomly selected areas (1 μm × 1 μm) on the substrates. The results of energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), electron probe micro-analysis (EPMA) and x-ray diffraction (XRD) (Fig. S2) indicated that TNrs shared the same chemical component (Ti) as the Ti sheet before nanorod growth, which was discussed in detail in our early research17.
Effect of TNrs in Protein adsorption and Cell adhesion
TNrs along with their control (pure Ti) were incubated in α-MEM (10% FBS) for 4 h to assay the early protein adsorption behaviors on different samples (Fig. 3a and Figs S3 snd S4, Supporting Information). The protein adsorption was found to be 33.83 ± 6.45 μg/mL (Ti), 27.62 ± 1.14 μg/mL (LTNr), 40.20 ± 4.55 μg/mL (MTNr) and 25.20 ± 2.05 μg/mL (HTNr), respectively. It was obvious that the MTNr surface adsorbed statistically more protein than other surfaces (*p < 0.05). However, the adsorbed protein on the LTNrs and HTNrs was less than that on the pure Ti. When bovine serum albumin (BSA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) were labeled with a red Cy3 dye and then interacted with different substrates followed by washing, fluorescence microscopy further confirmed that MTNrs could adsorb these two proteins with the highest efficiency (Figs. S3 and S4).
Cell adhesions on the samples after 30, 60 and 120 min of incubations were measured by counting pre-osteoblastic cells stained with DAPI. The results demonstrated that the cell number on MTNr surface was always the largest at all time intervals and statistically larger than the Ti, LTNr and HTNr surfaces (*p < 0.01) (Fig. 3b,c). However, the cell number showed no statistical difference between the Ti, LTNr and HTNr surfaces after incubation at 30, 60 and 120 min.
Cell proliferation and differentiation
The attachment of pre-osteoblastic cells (MC3T3-E1) on the sample surfaces was analyzed for understanding the cell–materials interaction. Fig. S5 exhibited SEM images of the cells on the pure Ti and TNr surfaces after 24 h of the cell culture. It could be observed that the number of cells was larger on TNr surfaces than on the pure Ti. The shapes of the pre-osteoblasts cultured on the different surfaces were different. Cells showed more and longer filopodials stretched on TNr surface, especially on MTNrs, indicating that the medium density of TNrs was more beneficial for cell attachment. By MTT assay (Fig. 4a), MC3T3-E1 cells were found to proliferate faster on the MTNrs than on the other substrates on day 3 and 5. Collectively, pronounced cell density, proliferation and superior cell attachment were observed on MTNr substrate compared with the other substrates (Figs. 3 and 4).
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity normalized to total protein content was measured to investigate the osteogenic function of the pre-osteoblasts on the pure Ti and TNrs (Fig. 4b). ALP is an early marker of osteoblast differentiation and plays a major role in mineralization18. Figure 4b demonstrated that MTNrs elicited an up-regulation of ALP activity compared to the rest of the substrates. On the other hand, LTNrs and HTNrs have statistically lower ALP activity than pure Ti. These data suggest that MTNrs could most efficiently promote osteogenic differentiation. This finding was further supported by the real-time PCR analysis of another osteogenic marker, Runx2 (Fig. 4c). The TNrs surface showed significantly higher gene expression (**p < 0.01) than pure Ti after incubated 14 days and the expression on the MTNrs was the highest.
In vivo test
The MTNrs and pure Ti controls were respectively implanted into a rabbit bone defect. In the experiment, 8 New Zealand white adult rabbits (half males and half females) aged approximately 6 months and weighing 2.3–3.0 Kg was used. Ti or MTNr (Φ3 mm × 8 mm) was implanted into the defect randomly selected around the New Zealand white rabbit leg (Fig. S6). Twelve weeks after implantation, the newly formed bone was examined by push-out test and histological analysis. The bonding strengths of different bone implants were tested by the push-out method. The results of the push-out test were expressed as the maximum push-out force in Fig. 5a, which was consistently higher for the MTNrs than for the pure Ti. The maximal push-out test force of the MTNrs was increased by 1.5-fold at 12 weeks (**p < 0.01). These results indicate that MTNrs promoted the bone formation around the implants and the consequent osteointegration.
The collagen formation on MTNrs and pure Ti were examined using Masson’s trichrome staining. Blue stained dense collagen matrix was observed on the MTNrs (Fig. 5c), while sparse collagen matrix was observed on pure Ti (Fig. 5b). It could be seen from the obvious gap that there is no new bone formation at the interface between pure Ti and bone tissue after implantation into rabbits for 12 weeks (Fig. 5b). However, collagen matrix could be observed on MTNrs after being implanted for 12 weeks (Fig. 5c). These results further confirm the good osteointegration achieved by MTNrs.
Recent in vitro and in vivo studies have confirmed the biological sensitivity to the level of nanostructured surfaces of implant biomaterials19. Nanotopography has been demonstrated to play an important role in modulating osteogenic tissue development20,21. In this study, Ti, LTNrs, MTNrs and HTNrs were investigated for cellular response. When a biomaterial was implanted into the body, various kinds of proteins from body fluids would be adsorbed to the substrate surface22. Nano-scale surface was believed to greatly contribute to the protein adsorption, which was generally considered as an important process for primary cell adhesion23. Up to now, the controllable creation of nanotopographic features on Ti surface is still a great challenge. Cell adhesive proteins can provide attachment sites for osteoblasts, which can lead to faster bone in-growth and implant stabilization. Our results showed that the MTNr surface adsorbed statistically more protein than other surfaces (*p < 0.05) whereas the protein adsorbed on the LTNrs and HTNrs was less than the pure Ti. Real-time PCR analysis of markers of Runx2 was further performed to confirm that the surface topography promoted osteogenic differentiation (Fig. 4c). We believe that the capability of adsorbing most proteins onto the MTNrs among all substrates studied resulted in the highest differentiation and most pronounced bone formation and osteointegration by MTNrs.
In summary, this study was to clarify the effect of the density of TNrs on MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblastic cells behaviors and osteointegration. TNrs with the medium density were found to promote the protein adsorption, cell attachment, cell proliferation and cell differentiation. Such promotional effect of the MTNrs further promoted the bone formation and integration between the implants and the surrounding bone tissue, which was supported by push-out test and Masson staining. This work suggests that the creation of TNrs with a medium density on Ti implant surface by anodizing is a promising method of enhancing the bone formation and osteointegration.
Methods Section
Preparation of TNrs with tunable surface densities
Pure Ti sheets (0.1 mm thick, obtained according to standard American Society for Testing & Materials F67-2000 for biomedical application, Baoji Qichen New Material Technology Co., Ltd) with the dimension of 3.5 cm x 3.5 cm was degreased by sonicating in acetone and ethanol, then treated with 1:1 (v/v) HF and HNO3 solution. Treated Ti sheets were washed by deionized water and then dried with nitrogen stream.
Electrochemical anodization was conducted in a two-electrode configuration with the electrolyte of NH4F and H2C2O4 mixture, while Ti and Cu foils worked as the working and counter electrodes. Ti sheets were contacted with a Cu plate and then pressed against an O-ring, leaving a 3 cm × 3 cm surface exposed to the solution. Before electrochemical treatment, the Ti sheet was placed in the fluoride-containing solution for 10 min. Anodization was performed by applying 200 mA constant current at room temperature via a DC power supply. The as-prepared specimens were thoroughly washed with deionized water.
Characterization of TNrs
Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Nova Nano SEM 430, Germany) was employed to characterize the morphology of TNrs and EDS was adopted for comparing their elements. Atomic force microscopy (AFM, SPM-9600, Shimadzu) was carried out with the scan rate and size of 0.8 Hz and 1 × 1 μm2, respectively, to analyze the roughness of TNr surface.
Protein adsorption assay
A 1 mL droplet made of α-MEM (Invitrogen) and 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (Invitrogen) was pipetted onto each specimen placed in a 24-well plate. After incubation at 37 °C for 4 h, the cells were washed three times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and then lysed to release proteins from samples in 0.2 vol% Triton X-100 at 4 °C for 12 h. The protein concentration in the collected solutions was determined using a MicroBCA protein assay kit (Pierce).
Cell culture, proliferation and differentiation
Pre-osteoblasts (MC3T3-El) (Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences) were cultured in α-MEM (Invitrogen) and 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, Invitrogen) media, which was replaced at regular intervals. The square samples with 10 mm in length and 0.1 mm in thickness were settled at the bottom of 24-well polystyrene culture plates with 104 cells per well. All cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.
For FESEM observation, cells were fixed with 3% glutaradehyde for 6 h after co-cultured with samples for 24 h. Samples were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol (50%, 70%, 95% and 100%) after being rinsed three times with PBS, with each concentration twice for 10 min. They were then dried and coated with gold by sputtering.
Cells were seeded on the substrates and allowed to attach for 60 and 120 min. At each prescribed time point, the non-adherent cells were removed by rinsing with PBS solution. Cells were fixed and stained with 40, 60-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The cell numbers in five random fields were counted under a fluorescence microscope.
MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay was employed to estimate the density of viable cells24,25,26. After co-cultured with cells for 1, 3 and 5 days, the specimens were washed by PBS and transferred to a new 24-well polystyrene culture plate. The MTT solution was added to each well and incubated for another 4 h at 37 °C. Then dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to dissolve any resulting formazan crystals and the optical density (OD) of each solution was measured at a wavelength of 490 nm using a spectrophotometer (Bio-tek).
MC3T3-E1 cells were seeded in 24-well polystyrene culture plates at the density of 5 × 103 cells per well with the osteogenic medium containing 10 mM Na-β-glycerophophate and 10−8 M dexamethasone and 50 g/mL ascorbic acid. After co-cultured for 14 days, the cells were washed three times with PBS and lysed in 0.2 vol% Triton X-100 for 12 h at 4 °C. Culture supernatants were combined with p-nitrophenyl phosphate (p-NPP) and then the absorbance was measured at 405 nm. The intracellular total protein content was determined using the MicroBCA protein assay kit. All results were normalized by protein content.
Osteogenesis-related Runx2 gene expressions
MC3T3-E1 cells were seeded at the density of 2 × 104 cells per well and cultured for 7 and 14 days. The total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed to complementary DNA (cDNA) using the Prime Script RT reagent kit (Takara). The real time polymerase chain reaction (Real-time PCR) was performed with SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara) and primers for Runx2 (F: 5′-TCC AAC CCA CGA ATG CAC TA-3′; R: 5′-GAA GGG TCC ACT CTG GCT TTG-3′). The gene expression was calculated using the 2-ΔΔct method25 by Rotor-Gene Real-Time analysis software 6.0.
Push-out test
To evaluate the bone-implant bonding strength for osteointegration, the push-out experiments to the bone-implant unit was performed on five implants of each group at each time point using a universal testing system (Shimadzu, AGS-10kNG, Japan). A force was applied to push the implant vertically out at a constant crosshead speed of 0.5 mm·min−1. The load-displacement curve was recorded for the measurement of the maximum pull-out force. All of the animal studies described in this work were performed according to the guidelines and regulations of National Institutes of Health (NIH) and their protocols were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA.
Histological examination
For observation of the interface between bone and implant, the tibias of rabbit were washed in PBS, fixed with 10% (wt/v) formalin overnight, dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol (70%, 80%, 90%, 95% and 100%, increasing every day) and then embedded in paraffin. From the paraffin blocks, 5 μm-thick serial sections were obtained by a diamond blade along the long axis of the implants. The sections were then mounted in epoxy resin and polished for Masson’s trichrome staining.
Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0 software. All the results were analyzed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the level of significance. The data is reported as mean ± standard error of the mean. P < 0.05 and p < 0.01 were considered to be statistically significant and highly statistically significant.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Ning, C. et al. Ti nanorod arrays with a medium density significantly promote osteogenesis and osteointegration. Sci. Rep. 6, 19047; doi: 10.1038/srep19047 (2016).
References
Tetsui, T. Gamma Ti aluminides for non-aerospace applications. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 4, 243–248 (1999).
Cazacu, O., Plunkett, B. & Barlat, F. Orthotropic yield criterion for hexagonal closed packed metals. Int. J. Plast. 22, 1171–1194 (2006).
Geetha, M., Singh, A. K., Asokamani, R. & Gogia, A. K. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 54, 397–425 (2009).
Kitada, A. et al. Selective preparation of macroporous monoliths of conductive titanium oxides Ti(n)O(2n-1) (n = 2, 3, 4, 6). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 10894–10898 (2012).
Osterloh*, F. E. Inorganic Materials as Catalysts for Photochemical Splitting of Water. Chem. Mater. 20, 10 (2007).
Xie, K. et al. Polyaniline nanowire array encapsulated in titania nanotubes as a superior electrode for supercapacitors. Nanoscale 3, 2202–2207 (2011).
Yan, C., Xi, W., Si, W., Deng, J. & Schmidt, O. G. Highly conductive and strain-released hybrid multilayer Ge/Ti nanomembranes with enhanced lithium-ion-storage capability. Adv. Mater. 25, 539–544 (2013).
Kahles, J., Field, M., Eylon, D. & Froes, F. Machining of titanium alloys. JOM. 37, 27–35 (1985).
Jonášová, L., Müller, F. A., Helebrant, A., Strnad, J. & Greil, P. Biomimetic apatite formation on chemically treated titanium. Biomaterials 25, 1187–1194 (2004).
Naskar, D., Nayak, S., Dey, T. & Kundu, S. C. Non-mulberry silk fibroin influence osteogenesis and osteoblast-macrophage cross talk on titanium based surface. Sci. Rep. 4, 4745 (2014).
Zheng, Y. H., Li, J. B., Liu, X. Y. & Sun, J. Different Activities of Osteoblast and Bacteria on a Nanostructured Titanium Surface for Dental Implant. Adv. Mater. Res. 586, 39–44 (2012).
Marklein, R. A. & Burdick, J. A. Controlling stem cell fate with material design. Adv. Mater. 22, 175–189 (2010).
Prasad, A., Berger, D. & Popat, K. PCL Nanopillars Versus Nanofibers: A Contrast in Progenitor Cell Morphology, Proliferation and Fate Determination. Adv. Eng. Mater. 14, B351–B356 (2012).
Shastri, V. P. In vivo engineering of tissues: Biological considerations, challenges, strategies and future directions. Adv. Mater. 21, 3246–3254 (2009).
Yao, X., Peng, R. & Ding, J. Cell-material interactions revealed via material techniques of surface patterning. Adv. Mater. 25, 5257–5286 (2013).
Zhong, M. L. et al. Ti nanorod arrays with periodic density fabricated via anodic technology. Micro Nano Lett. 9, 168–170 (2014).
Huang, S., Ning, C., Peng, W. & Dong, H. Anodic formation of Ti nanorods with periodic length. Electrochem. Commun. 17, 14–17 (2012).
Das, K., Bose, S. & Bandyopadhyay, A. Surface modifications and cell–materials interactions with anodized Ti. Acta Biomater. 3, 573–585 (2007).
Park, J. K. et al. The topographic effect of zinc oxide nanoflowers on osteoblast growth and osseointegration. Adv. Mater. 22, 4857–4861 (2010).
Nancy, W. et al. Biological length scale topography enhances cell-substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 117, 3153–3164 (2004).
Oh, S. et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106, 2130–2135 (2009).
Puleo, D. & Nanci, A. Understanding and controlling the bone–implant interface. Biomaterials 20, 2311–2321 (1999).
Xu, L. et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the surface bioactivity of a calcium phosphate coated magnesium alloy. Biomaterials 30, 1512–1523 (2009).
Eramo, A. et al. Identification and expansion of the tumorigenic lung cancer stem cell population. Cell Death Differ. 15, 504–514 (2008).
Zhu, H. et al. Controlled growth and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on grooved films assembled from monodisperse biological nanofibers with genetically tunable surface chemistries. Biomaterials 32, 4744–4752 (2011).
Wang, J., Wang, L., Li, X. & Mao, C. B. Virus activated artificial ECM induces the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells without osteogenic supplements. Sci Rep 3, 1242(2013)
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2012CB619100) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51372087, 51072057). Y.Zhu and C.B.M. would like to thank the financial support from National Institutes of Health (CA200504 and CA195607), National Science Foundation (CMMI-1234957 and CBET-1512664), Department of Defense office of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (W81XWH-15-1-0180), Oklahoma Center for Adult Stem Cell Research (434003) and Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology (HR14-160).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.Y.N., Y.J.W. and C.B.M. conceived this work. C.Y.N., S.Y.W., Y.Z., M.L.Z., Y.Zhu, G.X.T. and C.B.M. designed the experiments. M.L.Z., X.L., M.L., Y.Zhu and Z.Y.Y. performed the experiments. S.Y.W., P.Y. X.L.W. Y.L., T.R.H. and W.C. performed the image processing procedures. C.Y.N., S.Y.W. and Y.Zhu contributed equally to this work. S.Y.W., Y.Zhu and C.B.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Ning, C., Wang, S., Zhu, Y. et al. Ti nanorod arrays with a medium density significantly promote osteogenesis and osteointegration. Sci Rep 6, 19047 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19047
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19047
This article is cited by
-
The structural and bioactive behaviour of strontium-doped titanium dioxide nanorods
Journal of the Korean Ceramic Society (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.