Coralline algal physiology is more adversely affected by elevated temperature than reduced pH

Abstract

In this study we analyzed the physiological responses of coralline algae to ocean acidification (OA) and global warming, by exposing algal thalli of three species with contrasting photobiology and growth-form to reduced pH and elevated temperature. The analysis aimed to discern between direct and combined effects, while elucidating the role of light and photosynthesis inhibition in this response. We demonstrate the high sensitivity of coralline algae to photodamage under elevated temperature and its severe consequences on thallus photosynthesis and calcification rates. Moderate levels of light-stress, however, were maintained under reduced pH, resulting in no impact on algal photosynthesis, although moderate adverse effects on calcification rates were still observed. Accordingly, our results support the conclusion that global warming is a stronger threat to algal performance than OA, in particular in highly illuminated habitats such as coral reefs. We provide in this study a quantitative physiological model for the estimation of the impact of thermal-stress on coralline carbonate production, useful to foresee the impact of global warming on coralline contribution to reef carbon budgets, reef cementation, coral recruitment and the maintenance of reef biodiversity. This model, however, cannot yet account for the moderate physiological impact of low pH on coralline calcification.

Introduction

Global warming and ocean acidification (OA) are two global threats that affect many different aspects related to the maintenance of biological communities, ecosystem services and human population stability. Therefore, they are major concerns in marine research, particularly with respect to calcifying organisms1,2,3. OA has received significant scientific attention relative to global warming, due to the increasing number of studies that have concluded that decreases in the calcium carbonate saturation state of seawater (CaCO3, Ω) have significant impact on calcifying organisms3,4,5,6. Meta-analyses initially questioned the significance of OA as a major threat to marine biodiversity7 but have recently documented an enhanced sensitivity of marine organisms to OA under elevated seawater temperature highlighting different adverse effects, such as declines in survival, calcification rates, growth and abundance, in a broad number of organisms6.

Coralline red algae (Rhodophyta), key calcifying primary producers present in most coastal ecosystems8, are considered one of the most sensitive organisms to OA9. However, the sensitivity of coralline algae to increasing temperature is still unclear, as experimental analyses have documented opposite results10,11. Coralline algae precipitate high Mg-calcite12,13, the most soluble form of CaCO3, on their cell walls12 to form external coralline carbonate skeletons that represent more than 80% of the dry mass of the thallus14. These external skeletons provide structural support and protection but increase the vulnerability of the thalli to reduced pH9,13, in spite of skeletons are still protected from surrounding environment by an epithelium15. Coralline algae are important contributors to coral reef carbon budgets16,17,18,19 and play a key role in reef framework development20. Erect morphologies, such as articulated algae and rhodoliths, also provide habitats for a large diversity of organisms21,22,23 and crustose species (CCA) serve as a substrate for the settlement of coral larvae20,24. Given the ecological significance of coralline algae in many coastal ecosystems, the adverse impact of global change on this group will compromise a large variety of ecosystem processes2,9,25.

Investigations of coralline responses to OA have yielded contradictory results. Some studies have reported that OA decreases calcification4,26,27 and rates of photosynthesis4,11,27 and growth28,29 while others have not observed a clear effect of OA on algal metabolism10,30,31,32. Analyses of the effects of thermal stress have also produced results ranging from no effect10,11,30 to significant decreases in photosynthesis and calcification4. Several authors have also concluded that thermal stress exacerbates the adverse effect of OA on algal calcification11,30. Moreover, thermal stress triggers deleterious effects on coralline performance, such as a reduction of larval metamorphoses capacity, the induction of bleaching and tissue mortality for different CCA species30,33. These contradictory findings have been interpreted as resulting of a significant species-specific component of coralline sensitivity to global change.

Light stress and the inhibition of photosynthesis are fundamental in the analysis of the dysfunctional coralline response because there is a linear association between photosynthesis and calcification12,34. Unfortunately, these factors have received limited attention in the experimental analysis of coralline responses to global change, but recent studies of the effect of elevated temperature and pCO2 have provided new evidence of the dependence of coralline calcification on light and photosynthetic activity. These studies have concluded that irradiance is the only parameter that significantly impacts CCA calcification in Hydrolithon reinboldii10 and that calcification in the CCA Lithophyllum cabiochae is linearly related to photosynthesis11. Algal calcification is also related to thallus respiration because the former is energetically dependent on both photosynthesis18,19 and mitochondrial respiration.

The aim of this study was to contribute to the understanding of the physiological responses of coralline algae to reduced pH and elevated temperature by analyzing the direct and combined effects of OA (pH of 7.9) and thermal stress (+2 °C above the local maximum monthly mean [MMM] of 30 °C35) on thallus physiology. We focused the attention on the analysis of the role of light-stress in this response. Therefore, we selected the experimental light fields according to the particular photobiology of each species and monitored the diurnal variation of solar irradiance and the impact caused on the maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm). We selected three species belonging to the three main coralline growth forms, which represent different ecological and/or evolutionary solutions with potential contrasting morpho-functional abilities to respond to environmental changes: the rhodolith Neogoniolithon sp.; a crustose coralline (CCA), Lithothamnion sp.; and an articulated alga, Amphiroa tribulus (Fig. 1). Specifically, we tested the direct and combined effects of both of these global stressors on thallus photosynthesis, respiration and calcification rates by focusing on their metabolic coupling and on the role of light stress and photosynthesis inhibition in the disruption of this coupling. Prior to this analysis, we characterized the physiology of the experimental organisms by determining: (1) the photosynthetic light response (P vs. E curve) for each species; (2) the species-specific physiological coupling among the photosynthesis, respiration and calcification rates; and (3) the short-term response of each metabolic rate to temperature (Q10).

Figure 1
figure1

Images of the three coralline species (Rhodophyta) characterized in this study in their natural habitats.

(a) Rhodolith (see arrow) belonging to the genus Neogoniolithon sp. collected at a depth of 3 m on sand sediments within sparse beds of the seagrass Thalassia testudinum. (b) The crustose coralline alga (CCA) belonging to the genus Lithothamnion sp. (see arrow) grows on the sides of/underneath Orbicella faveolata/annularis coral colonies at variable depths within the coral community but under very low light conditions. (c) Close-up of a CCA specimen used for the physiological characterization that was collected below an Orbicella faveolata skeleton. (d) The articulated alga Amphiroa tribulus growing within the branches of a colony of the coral Agaricia agarites at a depth of 5 m within the coral community.

Results

Photobiology and metabolic coupling among photosynthesis, respiration and calcification

In their optimal physiological condition in summer (30 °C), rhodoliths exhibited the highest metabolic rates, except at subsaturating light conditions, at which the lowest rates of photosynthesis were observed (lower photosynthetic efficiency, α, Fig. 2a; Table S1). By contrast, the CCA exhibited the lowest metabolic rates on an area basis (Figs 2 and 3). The photosynthetic efficiency of the CCA was as high as that of the articulated alga, which exhibited intermediate photosynthesis values (Fig. 2a). At subsaturating photosynthesis, we observed decalcification (negative values for calcification, G, Fig. 2) in the three corallines where the rhodolith had the highest decalcification rates. Also, we observed saturation of coralline calcification before saturation of photosynthesis, particularly in the articulated alga (Fig. 2b). This observation implies a non-linear association of coralline calcification (G) and gross photosynthesis (P) (Fig. 2b). A sigmoidal function provided a quantitative description of this coupling and an estimation of (i) maximum coralline calcification (Gmax, μmol O2 m−2 h−1; Fig. 2b) as the amplitude, (ii) light enhanced calcification (-rG:P; mol CaCO3 produced per mol O2 evolved; see Table 1) as the coralline calcification enhancement rate under increasing illumination and photosynthesis and (iii) the magnitude of decalcification activity under subsaturating light. The sigmoidal function also highlighted a photosynthesis threshold for coralline calcification, referred here to as the minimum photosynthesis requirement (MPR, R2 > 0.80, Fig. 2b, Table 1), above which coralline calcification was positive and enhanced by increasing photosynthesis until the maximum rate was reached (Gmax, Fig. 2b). MPR was lower for CCA and the articulated alga, A. tribulus (Table 1), while the rhodolith Neogoniolithon sp. required a three-fold greater photosynthetic rate to offset thallus decalcification (Table 1). In contrast to this non-linear coupling, post-illumination respiration and coralline calcification exhibited a linear relationship (R2 ≥ 0.95, P < 0.01; Fig. 2c). The slope was similar for the CCA and the rhodoliths (0.573 ± 0.028; F(1,6) = 0.84, P = 0.39, Fig. 2c) and smaller for the articulated alga (0.363 ± 0.045, F(1,14) = 10.2, P = 0.009, Fig. 2c).

Table 1 Metabolic quotients (Q10) and parameters derived from the sigmoidal fit describing the species-specific metabolic coupling between calcification and photosynthesis rates (see Fig. 2b) for: Neogoniolithon sp. (rhodolith), Amphiroa tribulus (articulated) and the CCA Lithothamnion sp.
Figure 2
figure2

Description of the photosynthetic response to irradiance and the species-specific coupling among metabolic rates for each coralline growth form.

(a) Photosynthetic responses to irradiance (P vs. E curve). The variation in photosynthetic efficiency (α, the slope of the linear increase at subsaturating light) is shown in the inserted graph. (b) Non-linear coupling between thallus calcification and gross photosynthesis. The trend lines represent sigmoidal fits (P < 0.05) with R2 = 0.93, 0.91 and 0.86 for rhodoliths, articulated alga and CCA, respectively. (c) Linear coupling between thallus calcification and post-illumination respiration. The trend lines represent linear regression fits (P < 0.05) for (i) pooled CCA and rhodolith data (R2 = 0.97) and (ii) data for the articulated alga Amphiroa tribulus (R2 = 0.97). Symbols represent mean values ± SEM (n = 4–8 determinations per metabolic rate): white circles indicate rhodoliths; grey circles indicate articulated algae; black circles indicate CCA.

Figure 3
figure3

Scaling metabolic quotients (Q10) for photosynthesis, respiration and calcification rates.

The symbols represent mean values ± SEM (n = 4–8) for (a) gross photosynthesis (Pmax), (b) post-illumination respiration (RL), (c) maximum calcification rates (Gmax) and (d) the photosynthesis to respiration ratio (Pmax:RL). The trend lines represent linear regression fits (see text for details). Dashed lines indicate metabolic rate decay. Symbols: white circles indicate rhodoliths, grey circles indicate articulated algae and black circles indicate CCA.

Scaling quotient of temperature (Q10)

Short-term incubations evidenced that temperature, as expected, significantly enhanced all metabolic rates along an optimal physiological range (Fig. 3), but significant differences in metabolic rates were observed among species (Table 1 and Tables S2 and S3). Post-illumination respiration (RL) and thallus calcification (Gmax) increased linearly with temperature from 24 °C to 32 °C for the rhodolith and the articulated alga, whereas the CCA exhibited a decline above 30 °C (Fig. 3b,c). A similar decline in thallus photosynthesis (Pmax) was observed above 30 °C for the three species (Fig. 3b,c). At 30 °C, which represented the seawater conditions at the moment of sampling (August 2013) and the maximum average summer temperature for this reef lagoon, Pmax for the three coralline species and all metabolic rates for the CCA reached a maximum (Fig. 3). The lowest values were measured at 24 °C (Fig. 3). The ratio between Pmax and RL (P:R) changed moderately with increasing temperature, particularly for the CCA (Fig. 3d), despite the significant changes in the photosynthesis and respiration rates. The articulated alga, A. tribulus, which exhibited larger reductions in Pmax relative to RL with increasing temperature, exhibited the greatest adverse effect of temperature on thallus P:R (Fig. 3d). A slight but non-significant reduction in thallus P:R was also observed under elevated temperatures in the rhodolith (Fig. 3d). The value of the Q10 factor ranged from 2 to 3 and differed between morphs and metabolic rates (Table 1 and Tables S2 and S3). Pmax exhibited the highest Q10 in the rhodoliths and the lowest in CCA, whereas Gmax displayed the opposite pattern, with the highest temperature enhancements in the CCA and the lowest in the rhodolith (Table 1; Table S1). By contrast, the effect of temperature on RL was highest for the articulated alga and lowest for the CCA (Table 1 and Table S2).

Variations in light exposure and water chemistry during the experiment

Organisms were exposed to diurnal variations in solar radiation under three different light treatments (see Materials and methods). Solar radiation exhibited minor changes during the 14 experimental days (August 18–31, 2013) with the exception of day 5, when we recorded a 50% reduction in light exposure due to dense cloud cover (Fig. S1). The average values at the surface exhibited maximum irradiance peaks of ~1700 μmol quanta m−2 s−1 at noon (Fig. S1) and an integrated daily light exposure of 35.2 ± 7.4 mol quanta m−2 day−1 (Fig. S1). We selected a specific experimental light regime for each coralline to induce similar, moderate light pressure (light stress) during the experimental treatments by adjusting each experimental light regime to the corresponding photobiology of the particular species. Rhodoliths, which were collected at a depth of 3 m within the seagrass bed, displayed a photoacclimatory response to higher light conditions compared to articulated alga and the CCA, with a higher Pmax and Ek and lower photosynthetic efficiency, α (see P vs. E curves, Fig. 2a). The CCA and the articulated alga were collected at depths of 5–6 m within the coral community and were thus acclimated to lower light conditions. However, in a previous experiment in which the organisms were exposed to the reef light conditions at a depth of 5 m (37% of surface irradiance -%Es- and Kd = 0.198 m−1), we observed that the CCA bleached and exhibited 100% thallus mortality immediately after the exposure of one day to direct light. The CCA selected for this comparison was a species belonging to the genus Lithothamnion sp., which was collected underneath coral colonies of Orbicella faveolata and O. annularis and was thus exposed to much lower light conditions than the articulated alga (30–37% of Es at 5–6 m depth). Its shade-adapted response was reflected in the low Pmax and Ek values and in the high photosynthetic efficiency, α (see P vs. E curve, Fig. 2a). The previous characterization of the P vs. E curves enabled the selection of the optimum experimental light regime for each species. We confirmed that a similar and moderate light pressure was induced on the three species during the experiment, as the variation in Fv/Fm in the control organisms was minimal (see Fig. 4). Reductions in Fv/Fm reflect the accumulation of photoinactivated photosystem II (PSII) due to photodamage, whereas Fv/Fm recovery is indicative of positive PSII repair. The final experimental light regimes (diurnal light exposure) averaged 16.4 ± 0.91, 12.3 ± 0.68 and 0.35 ± 0.01 mol quanta m−2 d−1, respectively, for rhodoliths, articulated alga and CCA (see Fig. 4). The variations in water temperature, pH and carbonate system parameters among the treatments are illustrated in Table S4 in the Supporting Information.

Figure 4
figure4

Variation in solar radiation and Fv/Fm during the experiment.

(a) The variation in daily light exposure (mol quanta m−2 d−1) and maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, Fv/Fm, measured at dusk daily for rhodoliths (b), articulated alga (c) and CCA (d). Lines in (a) are grey for rhodoliths, black for the articulated alga and dashed for CCA. Symbols in (b–d) are white circles for control treatments (ambient pH and 30 °C), grey squares for the low pH treatment (pH 7.9 and 30 °C), black squares for the thermal stress treatment (ambient pH and +2 °C [32 °C]) and white squares for the interaction between thermal stress and reduced pH (pH 7.9 and +2 °C [32 °C])). The dashed lines in (b–d) indicate Fv/Fm values before the initiation of the corresponding treatment. The black horizontal bars at the bottom of the figure illustrate the beginning and end of each 10-day treatment. The symbols represent mean values ± SEM (n = 4–10 per experimental day).

Chlorophyll a fluorescence

The variation in Fv/Fm during the experiment was similar for the control organisms of the three species (Fig. 4), confirming that the different selected light regimes exerted similar pressure on the photosynthetic apparatus of each species. We also observed an initial decline in Fv/Fm until day 3 that was of similar magnitude among species (~15%, Fig. 4). The initial Fv/Fm decline was followed by a partial or complete Fv/Fm recovery by day 5–6, when the light exposure minima were recorded (Fig. 4). These observations indicate i) the close dependence of Fv/Fm on the diurnal variation of solar radiation, ii) the similar and moderate light stress induced by each experimental light treatment on the corresponding species and iii) the ability of the control organisms of the three species to photoacclimate and cope with the experimental light stress. The control organisms did not exhibit significant changes in Fv/Fm at the end of the experiment (Fig. 4), but significant variations in thallus pigmentation (Fig. S2, Table S5) and Fv/Fm (Fig. 4, Table S6) were observed in the thermally stressed organisms. The largest accumulation of PSII-photodamage was observed in the articulated alga, A. tribulus and the CCA, whereas the lowest accumulation occurred in the rhodolith (Fig. 4). We quantified a 45%, 30% and 20% reduction in the final Fv/Fm values (experimental day 10) compared to the controls in the articulated alga, CCA and rhodolith, respectively.

Physiological determinations

The metabolic rates of the control organisms remained unchanged during the experiment, which is indicative of a minimally adverse tank effect on algal physiology (Tables S7 and S8). However, comparison revealed significant differences among treatments and growth-morphs. Elevated temperatures induced large declines in Pmax and RL in all of the corallines (Two-way ANOVA, P < 0.05, Table 2 Fig. 5). Rhodoliths exhibited a 40% reduction relative to the control (Tukey HSD, P < 0.05), while the largest photosynthetic and respiratory losses (60–75%) were observed in the articulated alga and the CCA (Fig. 5a,b). No effect of low pH on thallus photosynthesis and respiration rate was observed, but we observed significant declines in Gmax compared to the control rates of one half in the rhodolith and CCA and two thirds in the articulated alga (Tukey HSD, P < 0.05; Fig. 5c). Thermal stress caused similar reductions of thallus calcification in the rhodoliths (50% of the control), full inhibition of calcification in the CCA and significant decalcification activity in the articulated alga A. tribulus (Fig. 5c). The combined effect of thermal stress and low pH resulted in reductions of Pmax and RL in the three species similar to those observed in the thermal stress treatment alone (Tukey HSD, P < 0.05). However, calcification rates (Gmax) revealed an additive effect in the rhodoliths and CCA and a significant interaction (synergistic effect) in the articulated alga A. tribulus (two-way ANOVA, P < 0.05, Table 3). Finally, minimal variation in the photosynthesis/respiration ratio (P:R) of the three species was observed among treatments and a nearly constant value of ~2.5–3 mol O2 produced per mol O2 respired was observed (Fig. 5d)

Table 2 Mean ± SE (n = 4–8 replicates) of the absolute values of coralline metabolic rates for Neogoniolithon sp. (rhodolith), Amphiroa tribulus (articulated) and the CCA Lithothamnion sp, after being exposed for 10 days in semi-controlled conditions to reduced pH (=7.9) and + 2 °C of seawater temperature above MMM = 30 °C (thermal-stress).
Table 3 Two-way ANOVA tests analysing direct and combined effects of low pH and thermal-stress (+2 °C) on three coralline species: Neogoniolithon sp. (rhodolith), Amphiroa tribulus (articulated) and the CCA Lithothamnion sp. Pmax, maximum gross photosynthesis (μmol O2 cm−2 h−1); RL, Post-illumination Respiration (μmol O2 cm−2 h−1); and Gmax, maximum calcification rate (μmol CaCO3 cm−2 h−1).
Figure 5
figure5

Coralline responses to experimental treatments.

(a) Gross photosynthesis, Pmax; (b) post-illumination respiration, RL; (c) maximum calcification rate, Gmax; and (d) photosynthesis to respiration ratio, Pmax:RL. White bars indicate rhodoliths, grey bars indicate articulated alga and black bars indicate CCA. Asterisks and letters denote significant differences relative to control organisms (Tukey HSD, P > 0.05). The bars in (a–c) represent the average ± SEM (n = 4–8 per treatment) relative change with respect to the control. The bars in (d) represent final absolute values. Negative values for the relative changes in algal calcification express the induction of decalcification activity quantified as increases in total alkalinity.

Discussion

The results of this experimental study showed significant adverse effects of elevated temperature and low pH on coralline algal physiology and wide differences in their physiological impact among the three species examined. Elevated temperature caused a progressive accumulation of photodamage, which was expressed as a continuous reduction of Fv/Fm along the experiment in the three species. No accumulation of photodamage was observed in the control treatments (Fig. 4), indicative that the experimental light conditions were optimal and the three species were well photoacclimated to their respective light conditions. After exposure to elevated temperature (32 °C), we observed significant losses in algal photosynthesis and calcification in addition to the enhancement of photodamage, which were particularly pronounced for the articulated alga Amphiroa tribulus (Fig. 5). These findings indicate that light-induced photodamage was exacerbated under elevated temperature in the three coralline algae in spite of their contrasting photobiology, photoacclimatory condition and growth-form. This finding highlights the central role of light stress in determining the severity of the impact of thermal stress on coralline performance, consistent with previous results documented for CCAs33. It also reveals a similar response for coralline algae to that already documented for scleractinian corals36,37.

The limited attention paid to light stress in the analysis of the response of coralline algae to elevated temperature and low pH can explain the contrasting results and conclusions previously documented4,10,11. For example, the lack of impact of thermal stress on algal photosynthesis documented for the deep-growing CCA L. cabiochae by Martin, Cohu11, could have resulted from the very low light levels used in this study to simulate the natural light conditions of this species, insufficient to induce light stress on this species. In contrast, the strong decline in net photosynthesis observed by Anthony, Kline4 for the CCA Porolithon onkodes was likely due to the excessive experimental illumination applied in that study, which led to the induction of severe light stress on the experimental organisms. Anthony, Kline 4, however, attributed to OA the capacity to trigger coral and coralline bleaching, which has supported the widespread notion that OA is a stronger threat for these groups than thermal stress38,39. Our study does not support this interpretation for coralline algae, as we observed minimal impact of low pH on the photosynthetic descriptors (Fv/Fm, photosynthesis rates and algal pigmentation; Figs 4 and 5 and Tables S5, S6) under the moderate levels of light stress employed. Moreover, the direct impact of reduced pH on algal calcification was smaller than the impact caused by elevated temperature, in particular for the species most sensitive to light stress, which also showed the largest reductions in thallus photosynthesis (Fig. 5a).

The rhodolith Neogoniolithon sp. was the species that showed the most robust response to thermal and light stress, whereas the articulated alga Amphiroa tribulus and the CCA Lithothamnion sp. were particularly sensitive. In the physiological characterization performed before the experiment, the organisms of Neogoniolithon expressed a high-light condition, whereas Lithothamnion sp. presented physiological characteristics of a shade-adapted species, as reflected by the low irradiance levels required to induce similar excitation pressure in the photosynthetic membranes (PSII pressure sensu40 see Fig. 4). Samples of Lithothamnion sp. were collected on the side of or underneath coral colonies, under very low light conditions, whereas the rhodoliths of genus Neogoniolithon were growing in between the shallow and sparse seagrass meadow of the lagoon. Thus, the natural habitat of each species can explain their contrasting photosynthetic physiologies. In addition, the rapid changes in thallus illumination that rhodoliths suffer when they “roll” on the sediment implies that the species under study must have effective photoprotection mechanisms to respond to sudden exposures to high levels of solar radiation common in shallow reef habitats. Indeed, this capacity has been recently documented for a tropical rhodolith41. In contrast to the high-light condition, low light-adapted species have limited capacity to cope with light stress. This was confirmed for Lithothamnion sp. in this study, as we observed 100% thallus mortality when the experimental organisms were exposed to light conditions similar to those observed at 5–6 m depth (30–37% of surface irradiance, Es). Such strong mortality forced us to apply reduced levels of illumination (2% of Es) when we exposed the organisms of this species to the OA and thermal stress treatments. On the other hand, the high sensitivity showed by the articulated alga Amphiroa tribulus to light stress cannot respond to a similar shade-adapted physiology, as this species only required slightly lower irradiance levels than the rhodolith to maintain the optimal photosynthetic physiology of the control treatment (Fig. 4). This observation indicates that larger increases of light stress under elevated temperature or differences in the species ability to cope with light stress may explain the high accumulation of photodamage and the largest losses of algal photosynthesis and calcification found in this study for Amphiroa tribulus under elevated temperature (Fig. 5) and perhaps an important part of the large species-specific component documented for the response of coralline algae to thermal stress4,11,31,32.

In the physiological characterization of A. tribulus, we also observed that this species showed the largest increases in thallus respiration with temperature (Table 1, Fig. 3) and the largest impact of thermal-stress on the photosynthesis:respiration ratio (Pmax:RL; Fig. 5). Temperature enhances all metabolic rates through increasing enzyme activity and substrate availability (cf. Arrhenius equation42) and in the current analysis, we documented a significant variation among species and metabolic rates in response to temperature increases (Table 1), using the scaling factor known as Q1043 to characterize this effect. We also found the presence of species-specific physiological thresholds (Table 1, Fig. 3), as we observed, for example, that Pmax was compromised in the three species at 32 °C (Fig. 3), but that respiration and calcification rates only declined in the CCA at the highest temperature (32 °C; Fig. 3). According to this, the physiological threshold of algal photosynthesis at 32 °C could explain the severe decline observed in the three species after exposing the organisms for 10 days to this temperature, along with the species-specific enhancement in photodamage. However, no adverse effect was detected at 32 °C for thallus respiration and calcification of the rhodolith and the articulated alga (Fig. 3). Thus, the reductions observed for these two species after 10 days at this temperature cannot be the result of a direct impact of temperature (Fig. 5), but to indirect responses associated with the severe reduction observed in algal photosynthesis. As the maintenance of a negative carbon balance in the algal thallus compromises the survival of the organism, a metabolic adjustment to resolve a suboptimal thallus condition (Pmax:RL ≤ 1) may explain this response. In addition, extended periods of hypoxia within algal tissues may also limit aerobic respiration. Hence, the reduction observed in respiration may be an algal response to minimize the magnitude of carbon losses and/or the hypoxia impact under significant declines in photosynthesis production. This response would be equivalent at the tissue level to the self-thinning response of plant canopies44.

The origin of the variation observed in algal calcification is, however, less clear. We found calcification losses for the three coralline species and treatments, which were consistent with previous estimates9,25,27. Part of the changes observed may have resulted from the direct impact of the experimental treatments on algal photosynthesis, but other cellular processes not directly related to photosynthesis activity may have been also affected. Calcification is an energy-demanding process and photosynthesis provides the energy required to support the formation of carbonate skeletons. Algal respiration is an alternative source of energy to support coralline calcification, which requires the oxygen and substrates released by photosynthesis. Photosynthesis, thus, stimulates both calcification and respiration rates, but also can take advantage of the CO2 released by respiration. Similarly, calcification can enhance algal photosynthesis, if it acts as a carbon concentration mechanism, as proposed previously45. Accordingly, the three metabolic rates are coupled and need to vary in a coordinated manner in response to environmental changes. Linear associations between algal calcification and photosynthesis have been described in previous studies46,47. In this analysis we observed linear associations between calcification and algal respiration (Fig. 2c), but a non-linear coupling between algal calcification and photosynthesis (Fig. 2b). From this characterization, we also determined a species-specific photosynthetic threshold of algal calcification, termed the MPR (Table 1, Fig. 2b), below which decalcification activity was observed in the three species, as previously described for CCAs18. This MPR descriptor helped us to understand the differential impact caused by elevated temperature on the calcification rate of each species, as we observed that algal photosynthesis after 10 days under elevated temperature was: a) above the MPR value for the rhodolith Neogoniolithon sp.; b) close to its MPR value for Lithothamnion sp.; and c) below the MPR for A. tribulus, (Fig. 5, Table 2). Hence, the physiological characterization of the metabolic coupling between photosynthesis and calcification provides a quantitative model to describe the severity of the impact of thermal stress on coralline calcification, based on the estimation of its impact on algal photosynthesis. It also allows for the quantification of the magnitude of algal carbonate losses through the description of the variation in decalcification activity (Fig. 6). This model cannot yet account for the direct physiological effect of low pH on coralline calcification and for any other potential negative effect of ocean acidification on the coupling mechanisms between the three metabolic rates. A deeper understanding of these mechanistic associations between algal photosynthesis, respiration and calcification will improve the interpretation of the experimental and natural observations.

Figure 6
figure6

Changes induced in coralline photosynthesis rates relative to the estimated minimum photosynthesis requirement for coralline calcification (MPR).

The bars represent mean values ± SEM of absolute photosynthesis after 10 days under the experimental treatments (n = 4–8). Horizontal lines represent the estimated minimum photosynthesis requirement (MPR) for each species from the sigmoidal fit (see Fig. 2b and text for details).

With the current information presented in this study, we can conclude that the vulnerability of coralline algae to global change is primarily related to their high sensitivity to light stress under elevated temperature and the moderate adverse and direct effect of OA on algal calcification. This supports previous conclusions that OA significantly exacerbates the negative effects of global warming on marine organisms6. Considering the ecological significance of coralline algae for many coastal ecosystems, the impact of global change on coralline communities will affect a large variety of processes. Additional physiological characterizations for key species are still needed for the evaluation of the severity of the impact of global change on different coralline communities. These physiological descriptions will allow the development of a common physiological model to understand the response of coralline algae to global change. Species-specific responses are currently considered an important limitation for the understanding of the impact of global warming and OA on marine communities. This idea is leading to the conclusion that the only effective tools to identify general trends in this response are meta-analysis and long-term experiments. Although we recognize the utility of these approaches, we believe that only the understanding of the processes directly affected by each environmental threat will allow the integration of natural and experimental observations into a common explanatory model. Our study provides a first quantitative model for coralline algae, although still needs to incorporate the direct effect of reduced pH on algal calcification. Further research is necessary to elucidate the mechanism(s) and/or processes in coralline algae that are directly affected by lowered pH. However, our results do not support the attribution to OA4 as the trigger of coralline bleaching nor the interpretation that OA represents a greater threat to coralline algae than thermal stress38,39, but they highlight the extraordinary fragility of coralline communities in highly illuminated habitats such as coral reefs. The adverse effects reported here can have profound and negative consequences in these ecosystems, as they can compromise the contribution coralline algae to reef carbon budgets, reef cementation, coral recruitment and the maintenance of reef biodiversity.

Materials and Methods

Experimental organisms (Fig. 1) were collected in the reef lagoon of Puerto Morelos (Mexican Caribbean, 20°51’N, 86°55’W) in the summer 2013, when algae were already acclimated to the local monthly mean maximum (MMM = 30 °C)35. Rhodoliths belonging to Neogoniolithon sp. (Fig. 1a) were collected at 3 m depth by snorkeling. Samples of Amphiroa tribulus (articulated algae) and Lithothamnion sp. (crustose coralline, CCA, Fig. 1b–d) were collected by scuba diving at a depth of 5–6 m within the coral community of the back-reef. The articulated alga grew within Agaricia spp. Colonies while the CCA grew underneath or adjacent to coral colonies of Orbicella faveolata and O. annularis. After collection, the organisms were transported in black plastic bags to the outdoor tank facilities of the UNAM in Puerto Morelos. Prior to the experimental manipulation (August 2013), branches of rhodoliths and the articulated alga and segments of the CCA of approximately 2–3 cm2, were cleaned of epiphytes and acclimated for seven days to the experimental control conditions. Changes in the maximum photosystem II (PSII) photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) were daily monitored at dusk with a submergible PAM fluorometer (Diving PAM Walz, Germany). The pre-acclimatory treatment was complete when Fv/Fm reached a constant value, indicating successful thallus acclimation.

Physiological determinations

Photosynthesis and respiration rates were determined polarographically in 20-ml water-jacketed chambers (DW3, Hansatech Instruments Ltd., Norfolk, UK) using Clark-type electrodes. The oxygen tension within the incubation chambers was maintained at 20–80% saturation by bubbling with N2 gas. A circulating bath with a controlled temperature system (RTE-100/RTE 101LP; Neslab Instruments Inc., Portsmouth, NH, USA) was used to maintain constant the incubation temperature (see Cayabyab and Enríquez48 for further details). Illumination was supplied with commercial 50-W halogen bulbs. A miniature PAR quantum sensor (Diving PAM, Walz, Germany) previously calibrated against an underwater light sensor (LI193-SAR, connected to a Data Logger LI-COR 1400, Lincoln, NE, USA) was used to calibrate the light within the chambers. Prior to the experimental analysis, we determined the photosynthetic response to irradiance (P vs. E curve) for each species (see Cayabyab and Enríquez48 for further details). This characterization enabled the selection of the light treatments and the irradiance required by each species for the determination of its maximum photosynthetic rate (Pmax). Accordingly, the maximum photosynthetic rate, Pmax, was determined during 45-min incubations at 600 μmol quanta m−2 s−1 for rhodoliths and the articulated algae and at 50 μmol quanta m−2 s−1 for the CCA. Post-illumination respiration (RL) was measured in darkness immediately after Pmax determinations. Gross photosynthesis was calculated by adding RL absolute values to net Pmax. Maximum calcification rates (Gmax) of algal thalli were determined using the alkalinity anomaly technique and a modified spectrophotometric procedure49 (see Enríquez and Schubert50 for further details). Coralline algae were incubated for 60 min at saturating irradiances in custom-made water-jacked acrylic chambers (30 ml) under a constant temperature. Filtered oceanic seawater (50 μm) collected the same day from the Yucatan current was used for these incubations. All metabolic rates were normalized to surface area, which was determined on a digital image using the software IMAGEJTM for rhodoliths and articulated algae. For the CCA, we used the aluminum foil technique.

Analysis of the physiological coupling between metabolic rates

Simultaneous determinations of photosynthesis and calcification rates were performed at 30 °C under different irradiance levels (4 replicates per light condition and species). Each organism was sequentially exposed for 60-min to 5 increasing light intensities (4 subsaturating and one saturating light conditions for algal photosynthesis). Oxygen evolution was continuously recorded during the incubations. Seawater was collected at the beginning and end of each incubation and stored for subsequent alkalinity analysis. After the last incubation (saturating light intensity), post-illumination respiration (RL) was also determined. For the description of the association between respiration and coralline calcification, the variation in thallus respiration was induced using different temperature of organisms previously exposed to saturation irradiance (Ek).

Determination of the metabolic quotient (Q10) for photosynthesis, respiration and calcification

The analysis of the sensitivity of the three metabolic rates to temperature was determined examining their changes in Pmax, RL and Gmax, at five different temperatures of incubation: 24 °C, 26 °C, 28 °C, 30 °C and 32 °C. This temperature range represents the seasonal fluctuation observed in the reef lagoon of Puerto Morelos (see description of the local temperature history for the period 1993–200535). Each determination underwent a 30-min pre-incubation at each temperature right before the physiological incubation. Six replicates were used per temperature and species. Post-illumination respiration is a better descriptor of the effect of temperature on algal respiration as it is less affected by solute and oxygen limitation than dark respiration rates, as documented previously for symbiotic corals51.

Experimental set-up: pH and thermal stress experiment

The pH and thermal stress experiments were performed at the UNAM mesocosm facilities of Puerto Morelos using 30-L tanks supplied with constant seawater from four 1000-L header tanks which had access to direct seawater flow from the reef lagoon. The average flow rate in the experimental tanks was 0.33 L s−1 with a turnover rate of about 90 s. After an initial pre-acclimation period, organisms (eight to ten organisms per species and tank; 16–20 per treatment) were exposed for 10 days to four treatments in a fully orthogonal two-factor design: 1) control treatment: 30 °C at sampling time (summer–August–average seawater temperature of the reef lagoon of Puerto Morelos35) and ambient pH (~8.1); 2) low pH treatment: control temperature (30 °C) and pH 7.9 (OA, B2 scenario according to IPCC 200752); 3) thermal stress treatment: 32 °C (thermal anomaly of +2 above the local MMM) and ambient pH (~8.1); and 4) interaction treatment: 32 °C and pH 7.9. Two 30-L tanks were used per treatment. CCA and articulated algae were located in the same tanks, while rhodoliths were placed into independent tanks. We selected three experimental light treatments to induce similar and moderate light stress on each species (moderate PSII pressure sensu40) according to their particular photobiology, previously characterized in order to perform this experiment (P vs. E curve, see Fig. 2a). Three light attenuations of solar irradiance at the surface were achieved by means of neutral screens: 53% attenuance for the rhodolith (47% of surface irradiance, Es), 75% for the articulated alga (25% Es) and ~98% (2% Es) for the CCA. The very low light levels selected for the CCA reflect the extraordinary sensitivity showed by this species to light stress. Seawater pH and temperature were monitored every 10 min with a computer-based system connected to a wireless data acquisition card (National Instruments, USA) at a resolution of 0.1 °C units for temperature and 0.01 units for pH. Electronic valves (Sierra Instruments, Inc., Smart-Track 2) delivered bubbled CO2 to the reservoirs for pH control and Thermo Scientific pH electrodes were calibrated at the beginning of the experiment using NBS buffers. Seawater temperature was controlled using commercial aquaria heaters (Process Technology, USA) located in the header tanks and connected to thermocouple sensors (J type, TEI Ingeniería, México). Superficial irradiance was recorded every 5 min with an underwater cosine-corrected sensor (LI193-SAR, LI-COR PAR) located in the tanks. The variation in diurnal solar radiation was expressed as changes in daily light exposure (mol quanta m−2 day−1). Due to the time required to complete the physiological determinations of each treatment, a 1-day delay was maintained before the initiation of the subsequent treatment. This delay allowed sufficient time for completion of the physiological characterizations of each treatment on the 10th day after the initiation of each treatment. The following timeline was used, i) the control treatment started on day 0; ii) the pH treatment started on day 1; iii) the temperature treatment started on day 2 and iv) the interaction treatment started on day 3 (see Fig. 4). At the beginning of the experiment, samples were randomly distributed in the tanks. Every two days, the tanks were cleaned to prevent epiphyte accumulation and water samples were collected for TA and pH determinations and carbonate chemistry analyses. Fv/Fm was monitored daily at dusk. All measurements were taken 20–25 min after dusk (local time 20:00, <10 μmol quanta m−2 s-1) as this time of the day allows detection of the maximum value of the diurnal variation of the photochemical efficiency of PSII following similar methodologies used in previous studies48,53,54. At the beginning of the experiment and after 10 days under each experimental treatment, light-saturated gross photosynthesis (Pmax), post-illumination respiration (RL) and calcification (Gmax) rates were determined. Results are expressed relative to the control values (n = 6–8 replicates per treatment).

Data analyses

Two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the effect of each experimental treatment on algal physiology. Tukey post-hoc tests enabled the identification of significant differences among treatments and/or species. Least-squares linear regression was used to describe the associations between metabolic rates and temperature and ANCOVA analysis allowed the evaluation of differences among species. A sigmoidal model best described the association between algal photosynthesis and calcification55 and allowed estimation of the different parameters showed in Table 1. Q10 was calculated as the ratio between the values estimated at 34 °C and determined at 24 °C. Data were log-transformed to meet the assumptions of homoscedasticity and normality if necessary. Statistical calculations were performed using SPSS software (IBM Inc.) and a CO2 sys excel macro-sheet56 was used to calculate seawater carbonate chemistry.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Vásquez-Elizondo, R. M. and Enríquez, S. Coralline algal physiology is more adversely affected by elevated temperature than reduced pH. Sci. Rep. 5, 19030; doi: 10.1038/srep19030 (2015).

References

  1. Kleypas, J. A. et al. Geochemical consequences of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide on coral reefs. Science 284, 118–120 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al. Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science 318, 1737–1742 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hofmann, G. E. et al. The effect of ocean acidification on calcifying organisms in marine ecosystems: An organism-to-ecosystem perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 41, 127–147 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anthony, K. R. N., Kline, D. I., Díaz-Pulido, G., Dove, S. & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Ocean acidification causes bleaching and productivity loss in coral reef builders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17442–17446 (2008).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Riebesell, U. et al. Reduced calcification of marine plankton in response to increased atmospheric CO2 . Nature 407, 364–367 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kroeker, K. J. et al. Impacts of ocean acidification on marine organisms: quantifying sensitivities and interaction with warming. Global Change Biol. 19, 1884–1896 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hendriks, I. E., Duarte, C. M. & Álvarez, M. Vulnerability of marine biodiversity to ocean acidification: A meta-analysis. Estuar. Coast. Shelf S. 86, 157–164 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Johansen, H. W. Coralline Algae, A First Synthesis. pp239 (CRC Press, 1981).

  9. Díaz-Pulido, G., Anthony, K., Kline, D. I., Dove, S. & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Interactions between ocean acidification and warming on the mortality and dissolution of coralline algae. J. Phycol. 48, 32–39 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Comeau, S., Carpenter, R. C. & Edmunds, P. J. Effects of irradiance on the response of the coral Acropora pulchra and the calcifying alga Hydrolithon reinboldii to temperature elevation and ocean acidification. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 453, 28–35 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin, S., Cohu, S., Vignot, C., Zimmerman, G. & Gattuso, J. P. One-year experiment on the physiological response of the Mediterranean crustose coralline alga, Lithophyllum cabiochae, to elevated pCO2 and temperature. Ecol. Evol. 3, 676–693 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Borowitzka, M. A. Morphological and cytological aspects of algal calcification. Int. Rev. Cytol. 74, 127–162 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Morse, J. W., Andersson, A. J. & Mackenzie, F. T. Initial responses of carbonate-rich shelf sediments to rising atmospheric pCO2 and “ocean acidification”: Role of high Mg-calcites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 70, 5814–5830 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bilan, M. I. & Usov, A. I. Polysaccharides of calcareous algae and their effect on calcification process. Russ. J. Bioorganic Chem. 27, 4–20 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Burdett, H. L. et al. The effect of chronic and acute low pH on the intracellular DMSP production and epithelial cell morphology of red coralline algae. Mar. Biol. Res. 8, 756–763 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Littler, M. M. The productivity of Hawaiian fringing-reef crustose Corallinaceae and an experimental evaluation of production methodology. Limnol. Oceanogr. 18, 946–952 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Adey, W. H. Coral reefs: Algal structured and mediated ecosystems in shallow, turbulent, alkaline waters. J. Phycol. 34, 393–406 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chisholm, J. R. M. Calcification by crustose coralline algae on the northern Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45, 1476–1484 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chisholm, J. R. M. Primary productivity of reef-building crustose coralline algae. Limnol. Oceanogr. 48, 1376–1387 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Perry, C. T. & Hepburn, L. J. Syn-depositional alteration of coral reef framework through bioerosion, encrustation and cementation: Taphonomic signatures of reef accretion and reef depositional events. Earth-Sci. Rev. 86, 106–144 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Foster, M. S. Rhodoliths: Between rocks and soft places. J. Phycol. 37, 659–667 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Steller, D. L., Riosmena-Rodríguez, R., Foster, M. S. & Roberts, C. A. Rhodolith bed diversity in the Gulf of California: the importance of rhodolith structure and consequences of disturbance. Aquat. Conserv. 13, S5–S20 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nelson, W. Calcified macroalgae–critical to coastal ecosystems and vulnerable to change: a review. Mar. Freshwater Res. 60, 787–801 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Heyward, A. J. & Negri, A. P. Natural inducers for coral larval metamorphosis. Coral Reefs 18, 273–279 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson, M. D. & Carpenter, R. C. Ocean acidification and warming decrease calcification in the crustose coralline alga Hydrolithon onkodes and increase susceptibility to grazing. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 434, 94–101 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Semesi, I. S., Kangwe, J. & Björk, M. Alterations in seawater pH and CO2 affect calcification and photosynthesis in the tropical coralline alga, Hydrolithon sp. (Rhodophyta). Estuar. Coast. Shelf S. 84, 337–341 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gao, K. S. & Zheng, Y. Q. Combined effects of ocean acidification and solar UV radiation on photosynthesis, growth, pigmentation and calcification of the coralline alga Corallina sessilis (Rhodophyta). Global Change Biol. 16, 2388–2398 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hofmann, L. C., Yildiz, G., Hanelt, D. & Bischof, K. Physiological responses of the calcifying rhodophyte, Corallina officinalis (L.), to future CO2 levels. Mar. Biol. 159, 783–792 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ragazzola, F. et al. Ocean acidification weakens the structural integrity of coralline algae. Global Change Biol. 18, 2804–2812 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Martin, S. & Gattuso, J. P. Response of Mediterranean coralline algae to ocean acidification and elevated temperature. Global Change Biol. 15, 2089–2100 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Egilsdottir, H., Noisette, F., Noël, L. M. L. J., Olafsson, J. & Martin, S. Effects of pCO2 on physiology and skeletal mineralogy in a tidal pool coralline alga Corallina elongata. Mar. Biol. 160, 2103–2112 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Noisette, F., Egilsdottir, H., Davoult, D. & Martin, S. Physiological responses of three temperate coralline algae from contrasting habtiats to near-future ocean acidification. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 448, 179–187 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Webster, N. S., Soo, R., Cobb, R. & Negri, A. P. Elevated seawater temperature causes a microbial shift on crustose coralline algae with implications for the recruitment of coral larvae. ISME J. 5, 759–770 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pearse, V. B. Radioisotopic study of calcification in the articulated coralline alga Bossiella orbigniana. J. Phycol. 8, 88–97 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rodríguez-Martinez, R. E. et al. Environmental state and tendencies of the Puerto Morelos CARICOMP site, Mexico. Rev. Biol. Trop. 58, 23–43 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Warner, M. E., Fitt, W. K. & Schmidt, G. W. Damage to photosystem II in symbiotic dinoflagellates: a determinant of coral bleaching. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8007–8012 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Iglesias-Prieto, R. Temperature-dependent inactivation of photosystem II in symbiotic dinoflagellates. Proc. 8th Int. Coral Reef Symp. 2, 1313–1318 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Anthony, K. R. N. et al. Ocean acidification and warming will lower coral reef resilience. Global Change Biol. 17, 1798–1808 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Veron, J. E. et al. The coral reef crisis: the critical importance of &lt;350 ppm CO2. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 58, 1428–1436 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Maxwell, D. P., Falk, S. & Huner, N. P. A. Photosystem II excitation pressure and development of resistance to photoinhibition: I. Light-harvesting complex II abundance and zeaxanthin content in Chlorella vulgaris. Plant Physiol 107, 687–694 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Burdett, H. L. et al. Dynamic photoinhibition exhibited by red coralline algae in the red sea. BMC Plant Biol. 14 (2014).

  42. Arrhenius, S. A. Über die Reaktionsgeschwindigkeit bei der Inversion von Rohrzucker durch Säuren. Ibid 4, 226–248 (1889).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nobel, P. S. Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology (4th Edition). pp600 (CA Academic Press/Elsevier, 2009).

  44. White, J. Generalisation of self-thinning of plant populations. Science 278, 373 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  45. McConnaughey, T. & Whelan, J. Calcification generates protons for nutrient and bicarbonate uptake. Earth-Sci. Rev. 42, 95–117 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Pentecost, A. Calcification and photosynthesis in Corallina officinalis L. using the 14CO2 method. Brit. Phycol. J. 13, 383–390 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Borowitzka, M. A. & Larkum, A. W. D. Calcification in algae: Mechanisms and the role of metabolism. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 6, 1–45 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cayabyab, N. M. & Enríquez, S. Leaf photoacclimatory responses of the tropical seagrass Thalassia testudinum under mesocosm conditions: a mechanistic scaling-up study. New Phytol. 176, 108–123 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yao, W. & Byrne, R. H. Simplified seawater alkalinity analysis: Use of linear array spectrometers. Deep-Sea Res. PT I 45, 1383–1392 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Enríquez, S. & Schubert, N. Direct contribution of the seagrass Thalassia testudinum to lime mud production. Nat. Comm. 5, 3835 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Colombo-Pallotta, M. F., Rodríguez-Román, A. & Iglesias-Prieto, R. Calcification in bleached and unbleached Montastraea faveolata: evaluating the role of oxygen and glycerol. Coral Reefs 29, 899–907 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Solomon, S. et al.) 996 pp (Cambridge University Press, 2007).

  53. Enríquez, S., Merino, M. & Iglesias-Prieto, R. Variations in the photosynthetic performance along the leaves of the tropical seagrass Thalassia testudinum. Mar. Biol. 140, 891–900 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kemp, D. W., Hernández-Pech, X., Iglesias-Prieto, R., Fitt, W. K. & Schmidt, G. W. Community dynamics and physiology of Symbiodinium spp. before, during and after a coral bleaching event. Limnol. Oceanogr. 59, 788–797 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Seber, G. A. & Wild, C. J. Nonlinear Regression. pp768 (Wiley, 1989).

  56. Pierrot, D., Lewis, E. & Wallace, D. W. R. MS Excel Program Developed for CO2 System Calculations. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. ORNL/CDIAC-105a. (2006). http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ftp/co2sys/CO2SYS_calc_XLS_v2.1/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Two Mexican research projects granted to SE, DGAPA (IN206710) and CONACYT (Conv-CB-2009: 129880), provided financial support to this research. This paper is also part of the requirements for the fulfillment of the PhD degree of RM V-E in the postgraduate program Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (PCMyL) of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). This program is acknowledged for providing four years of CONACYT fellowship support to RM V-E. The Oceanographic and Meteorological Academic Service (SAMMO) of the UASA-UNAM and the technical assistance of E. Escalante-Mancera and F. Ruíz-Rentería are also acknowledged. Finally, we thank Wiebke E. Krämer, Darren Brown and Roberto Iglesias-Prieto for their valuable comments on the manuscript and input during the development of this project. Useful comments on the final manuscript from Darren Brown and Robert Trench are also acknowledged.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.E. designed research; R.M.V.-E. performed research; S.E. and R.M.V.-E. analysed data and wrote the paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vásquez-Elizondo, R., Enríquez, S. Coralline algal physiology is more adversely affected by elevated temperature than reduced pH. Sci Rep 6, 19030 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19030

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing