Abstract
We develop a theoretical model to describe the transport properties of normalmetal/thinferromagnet/superconductor device. We perform experimental test of the model using a gold tip on PdNi/Nb bilayer. The resonant proximity effect causes conductance features very sensitive to the local ferromagnetic properties, enabling accurate measurement of polarization and thickness of the ferromagnet by point contact spectroscopy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Spin polarization (P) represents an intrinsic parameter that characterizes a ferromagnet measuring the spin imbalance for the occupied electronic states. Experimentally, P can be determined by photoemission spectroscopy^{1} (PS) as well as by spindependent spectroscopy on magnetic tunnel junctions^{2} (MTJs), but both methods have important drawbacks: PS has limited energy resolution (few meV) and spatial sensitivity (few Angstrom of the surface) while MTJs need high quality fabrication process to get planar structures with uniform thin insulating barrier and a setup to apply high magnetic fields.
Less than twenty years ago, De Jong and Beenakker^{3} proposed the possibility to measure P by means of point contact Andreev reflection (PCAR) spectroscopy exploiting the Andreev reflection (AR) process at the metal(N)/superconductor(S) interface for which an incoming electron with energy less than the superconducting energy gap is retroreflected in the metal as a hole with opposite spin, while a Cooper pair enters the superconductor^{4}. If the metal is a ferromagnet (F), the probability for AR is reduced and (transport) polarization can be obtained from the study of the differential conductance spectra, as experimentally reported in 1998 by Soulen et al.^{5} and by Upadhyay et al.^{6}. Later, this technique has been used to characterize several ferromagnetic metals^{5,6,7,8} (Fe, Co, Ni), alloys^{5,9} (permalloy Ni_{x}Fe_{1−x}), manganites^{5,10,11} (La_{1−x}Sr_{x}MnO_{3}), ruthenates^{12,13} (SrRuO_{3}) and half metals^{5,14,15} (CrO_{2}).
From a theoretical point of view, a simple approach by Strijkers et al.^{7} gives a generalization of the BlonderTinkhamKlapwijk (BTK) theory^{16} to spin polarized materials by considering the current flowing in a F/S contact as I = (1 − P) ⋅ I_{u} + P ⋅ I_{P} with I_{P} and I_{u} the fully polarized and fully notpolarized current, respectively. Their model considers a weak (proximized) superconducting layer at the interface and succeeded, in some cases, to fit conductance dips often experimentally observed at energies close to the gap energy. Alternatively, F. PerézWillard et al.^{17} have considered two spindependent transmission coefficients for the majority and minority carriers in the ferromagnet. Both models have been widely applied to extract spin polarization in several PCAR experiments involving ferromagnetic materials. This powerful method probes the bulk polarization of the ferromagnet (used as one of the electrodes) in the F/S contact. In this case, the boundary conditions are determined by the bulk density of states (DOS) in F and consequently the Andreev reflection probability is reduced by the lack of DOS available for the electronhole scattering.
The scenario described above is modified when PCAR spectroscopy is used to characterize F/S bilayers where a thin Flayer covers the Selectrode, a configuration of technological interest in the field of magnetic nanodevices. The analysis of such system requires further theoretical investigations, specially in the presence of very thin ferromagnetic layer. Indeed, the use of metallic (nonmagnetic) tip as electrode realizes a NF/S device in which the Nelectrode fixes the boundary conditions. In this case, the Andreev probability is not limited by the lack of DOS, as for a bulk ferromagnetic electrode configuration, while it is strongly affected by interference phenomena caused by resonant proximity effect. The resonant proximity originates from the influence of Andreev bound states confined to the Flayer and can be extremely sensitive to the ferromagnetic properties (thickness and polarization). For these reasons, resonance effects can be exploited to implement a Resonant Andreev Spectroscopy technique useful for the characterization of magnetic systems of reduced dimensions.
In this work we develop a theoretical model within the Bogoliubovde Gennes (BdG) formalism^{18} taking into account the presence of the tip/sample (N/F) and F/S (in the bilayer) interface, which correctly reproduces the double barrier geometry of a Resonant Andreev Spectroscopy setup. The theory demonstrates that NF/S configuration allows precise estimation of spin polarization as well as of the ferromagnet local thickness. A first evidence of the applicability of the model is provided by analyzing results obtained in PCAR experiment using a gold tip on the ferromagnetic side of a PdNi/Nb bilayer.
Results
Theoretical model
Up to now, double barrier problem, relevant in describing a Resonant Andreev Spectroscopy setup, has been studied for diffusive N/X/S systems (with X indicating a normal metal or a ferromagnet) by using Usadel equations^{19,20}. The semiclassical nature of this approach^{21} requires the existence of a semiclassical solution in the interlayer which is only allowed for a minimum interlayer thickness (i.e. the distance between the two barriers) much larger than the Fermiwavelength. For smaller thickness, the double barrier transmission coefficients are strongly affected by quantummechanical coherence. Thus, for the NF/S system with reduced thickness of the Finterlayer (~ξ_{F}, where ξ_{F} is the characteristic length of the superconducting correlation decay in the Flayer), we adopt a Bogoliubovde Gennes formalism in which the wave function Ψ(r), describing an excitation of energy E in the tip, in the ferromagnetic layer or in the superconductor, is derived by solving the eigenvalues problem given by (x ≠ 0, d)
In Fig. 1 we give a schematic of the model. The picture evidences the threedimensional character of the bulk normal electrode (tip) which provides the correct boundary condition for the scattering problem of electronic processes generated asymptotically far from the interface. This is the standard procedure applied in the scattering theory and used in the BTK approach^{16}: the scattering coefficients are calculated by considering the normal tip as a layer of infinite transverse dimension^{22,23,24}, as detailed hereafter.
The tip region (x < 0), does not present superconducting correlations (Δ(r) = 0), while is the tip quasiparticle Hamiltonian. The thin ferromagnetic layer (0 < x < d) is modeled by adding to H_{0}(r) a Zeeman energy term, , describing a magnetization M belonging to the y − z easy plane orthogonal to the transport direction (xdirection). The superconducting region (x > d) is described by a homogeneous pairing potential . The Fermi velocities mismatch among the different regions and the nonideality of the interfaces are modeled by using a scattering potential V(r) = U_{1}δ(x) + U_{2}δ(x − d), δ(x) being the Dirac delta function. The translational invariance implies the conservation of the linear momentum parallel to the interface. Thus, the wave function in each region can be written in the form leading to an effective onedimensional problem for , being the energy E and conserved quantum numbers during a scattering event. Once the wave functions , and describing, respectively, the tip, the magnetic layer and the superconductor have been expressed in terms of eigenfunctions associated to the eigenvalues problem given in equation (1), the scattering coefficients are determined by imposing the boundary conditions:
where k_{F} indicates the Fermi wave vector, while represents the BTK parameter describing the interface properties. The current I_{t} flowing through the device is expressed via the AR coefficients and the normal reflection coefficients defining the tip wave function . Here ψ_{t} is decomposed into incoming (in) or outgoing (out) electronlike () and holelike () modes having spin projection σħ/2, with σ = ±1.
Fixing the wave vector modulus and changing the integration variables, i.e. , the differential conductance can be derived as from
where f(E) is the FermiDirac distribution, represents the tip cross section, dΩ ≡ (sinϕ)^{2}cosθdθdϕ, while the angular integration is performed over the incidence angles θ ∈ [−π/2, π/2] and ϕ ∈ [0, π]. The factor counts the number of transverse modes which participate in the charge transport in the bulk. The finite dimension of the contact (N/F), naturally not included in the asymptotic boundary conditions of the scattering problem, is usually taken into account by introducing the tip shape factor in the current calculation as an exponential^{23} or a Lorentzian^{24} weight. This introduces one more model parameter related to the acceptance tunneling cone. When the spectroscopic features are not significantly affected by the introduction of such weight factor, it is usually neglected in order to simplify the model considering only parameters directly connected to physical measurable quantities. In the BTK formalism, the tip geometry information can be alternatively introduced by limiting the angular integration range (as we did in the calculations) to a maximum incidence angle (rectangular weight factor) defining the tunneling cone. Mathematically, the equivalence of the two procedures is expected for low transparency barriers (high Z values), because in such a case the high angle transmission processes are strongly suppressed^{24}.
The normalized differential conductance spectra G(V)/G_{NN} (with ) are the physical observables to be compared with the experimental data.
The theoretical model, despite its ballistic nature, is expected to correctly describe physical systems with subdominant diffusive contributions. Indeed, the particle trajectories which contribute to the tunneling current can be classified in two groups: (i) particle trajectories with a scattering angle close to the interface normal direction; (ii) particle trajectories with high incidence angle exploring the transverse dimension of the F layer. The (i)type trajectories provide the coherent contribution to the tunneling current and retain the quantum mechanical information described by the Bogoliubovde Gennes formalism (ballistic); (ii)type trajectories are representative of the diffusive motion along the transverse direction and provide an additive incoherent resistance. This featureless (energy insensitive) spectroscopic background contribution is usually accounted adding a classical resistance to the model, as we did in the calculations. Consequently, the use of a ballistic formalism, corrected by a classical (incoherent) contribution, is suitable for the correct modelling of the physical system. We stress that the BTK theory as well as the several generalized versions of it typically refer to the ballistic description of the phenomenon, verifying the correctness and the applicability of the model by comparison with the experimental results. Moreover, it is widely accepted that ballistic models can be properly used to explain the experimental results obtained in diffusive and/or granular systems, the only significant modification being a larger estimate of the BTK parameter (Z) associated to the interface transparency^{25,26}. Such considerations can be naturally extended to double barrier configurations in which resonant proximity effect is realized.
Conductance features versus model parameters
Hereafter, we show the conductance features originating from the theoretical model presented before. In discussing the results we use the dimensionless parameter r to characterize the ferromagnetic layer thickness d, taking the niobium Fermi momentum^{27} as the inverse of a reference length scale, i.e. . The remaining model parameters are the transparency of the N/F (F/S) interface Z_{1} (Z_{2}) and the (intrinsic) polarization of the ferromagnetic layer h = gμ_{B}M/E_{F}. The parameter h determines the number of spin up (down) electrons expressed in terms of the total number of particles n = n_{↑} + n_{↓}, so that .
Figure 2 shows the evolution of the conductance spectra as a function of the model parameters (Z_{1}, Z_{2}, r, h). The plots are obtained by keeping fixed three parameters and allowing only one parameter to vary in a range. Thus, we obtain Fig. 2a for 0 < Z_{1} < 8, Fig. 2b for 0 < Z_{2} < 8, Fig. 2c for 48 < r < 58 and Fig. 2d for 0.135 < h < 0.145. The solid (black) spectrum, in each panel, corresponds to a reference curve with the model parameters fixed as Z_{1} = 3.85, Z_{2} = 0.35, r = 51.25, h = 0.1403.
A completely transparent contact (Z_{1} = 0) results in a simple spectrum with two maxima close to the gap energy (see Fig. 2a). Increasing Z_{1}, there is a slow evolution of the spectra with the appearance of two conductance minima at ±Δ_{Nb} and a Zero Bias Conductance Peak (ZBCP) accompanied by two maxima within energy gap. For large Z_{1} values, the zero bias peak further splits. Differently, by varying Z_{2}, the wide variety of conductance features appears only for trasparent F/S barriers (Z_{2} < 1), larger Z_{2} values causing fully gapped spectra. Thus, the transparent regime is a necessary condition to observe the discussed features. We also notice that in the range Z_{2} < 1 the conductance spectra show a moderate dependence on Z_{2} (Fig. 2b) with respect to the spectra evolution originated by the remaining parameters (Fig. 2a,c,d). Moreover, the NF/S configuration favors the formation of bound states in the Flayer^{28} that appear in the differential conductance spectra as subgap resonances. The presence of such states is confirmed by an oscillating behaviour of the ZBC as a function of the rparameter, as observed in Fig. 2c. Indeed, since the emergence of these states is explained in terms of a widthdependent resonance condition, a ZBC modulation is expected by varying the confining dimension (i.e., Flayer thickness parametrized by r).
From Fig. 2c we notice a strong dependence of the conductance features on the parameter r, which can be used for the measurement of the Flayer thickness. The range 48 < r < 58 corresponds to a thickness variation of the ferromagnetic layer of less than 1 nm. As an example, in Fig. 3a we show the different spectra obtained for r = 51.25 (i.e. ), r = 52.25 (i.e. ) and r = 53.25 (i.e. ). To complete the analysis of the conductance spectra dependence on the various parameters, we show in Fig. 2d the result obtained by varying h in the range 0.135 < h < 0.145. This parameter gives direct information about the spin polarization P. The fast modification of the spectra for small variations of the parameter allows precise estimation of P. According to Fig. 3b, the differential conductance features are sensitive to h variations of the order of 10^{−3}.
Point contact spectroscopy
We apply the model to the results obtained in a point contact experiment where we realized a NF/S device by pushing a gold tip on a PdNi(4 nm)/Nb(40 nm) bilayer. The experimental details concerning the setup and sample preparation and characterization are given in the Methods section.
In Fig. 4, we show a variety of normalized conductance spectra, obtained at T = 4.2 K. In some cases, the spectra are characterized by a ZBCP higher than 2 (i.e., G(V = 0)/G_{NN} > 2, where G(V = 0) is the conductance at zero bias), i.e. exceeding the maximum zero bias conductance value (G(V = 0)/G_{NN} = 2) expected for a transparent barrier (Z = 0) in the standard BTK formulation. Moreover, double conductance dips as well as subgap maxima, with different intensity, are also observed.
To quantitatively analyze the conductance curves reported in Fig. 4a–d, experimental data are compared to theoretically calculated spectra. The fitting parameters are: the N/F barrier strength Z_{1}, the F/S barrier strength Z_{2}, the thickness parameter r and the spin polarization h; superconducting energy gap and the effective temperature being fixed at the values Δ_{Nb}(0) ≈ 1.24 meV (corresponding to the bulk value expected for a reduced T_{c} ≈ 7.35 K, see Methods for details) and T_{eff} = 0.7 K (lower than the bath temperature of 4.2 K).
We notice that some reported conductance features appear too sharp compared to the expected thermal smearing and require an effective temperature T_{eff} lower than the bath temperature. Such phenomenon has been already observed for Cu/Nb contacts^{7} and it has been ascribed to possible nonequilibrium transport processes in presence of proximity effect at the interface. Also considering the influence of cooling effect as reported^{29} in NF/S configuration, the cooling power generally acting on these systems seems to be not enough to cause a temperature reduction of few Kelvin, suggesting that further physical effects should contribute to determine such experimental observation. Alternatively, it has also been predicted that extraordinary temperature dependence of the resonant Andreev reflection peak is expected in N/quantumdot/S systems^{30}, the tunneling mediated by discrete energy levels being responsible for an anomalous broadening of the conductance peak with respect the thermal one. Experimentally, such behavior has been reported for N/semiconductor/S systems^{31} and in N/HighTcSuperconductors constrictions^{32}, where the discrete levels could be due to the existence of surface (Andreev) bound states. However, a satisfactory explanation of such effective temperature is still lacking.
All conductance spectra are characterized by a large Z_{1} value (2.3 < Z_{1} < 5.1) indicating a low transparency of the contact between the gold tip and the PdNi layer; at the same time, significantly lower Z_{2} values are always found (0.26 < Z_{2} < 0.50) as expected for insitu fabricated PdNi/Nb interface. The extracted Z_{2} values confirm that in order to observe these conductance features a transparent F/S barrier is necessary. According to Fig. 4, we can notice that reported spectra are reproduced by . The lowest value (Z_{2} = 0.26, Fig. 4c) can be explained either in terms of the slow dependence of the conductance spectra on Z_{2} or considering a local variation of the barrier properties (interface roughness, defects, etc.) due to the fabrication process. More interestingly, the remaining parameters involved in the fitting procedure take values in narrow intervals, 51.2 < r < 55.1 and 0.140 < h < 0.146, from which it is possible to give an estimation of the ferromagnet thickness 4.3 nm < d < 4.6 nm in the various sample positions and of the corresponding spin polarization 14.0% < P < 14.6%. This finding is compatible with polarization values already reported in literature^{33}.
In order to verify that conductance features are strictly related to the superconductivity of niobium, we performed complete temperature dependence of the conductance spectra. We show in Fig. 5 that for T = 7.7 K the device is not anymore superconducting and all conductance features are washed out. Moreover, the conductance dip position (black arrows in Fig. 5a) and the amplitude of the zero bias peak both correctly follow the expected BCS behaviour for , see Fig. 5b,c.
It’s worth mentioning that we used the minimal number of parameters to describe the physical system, where the existence of two interfaces (N/F and F/S parametrized by Z_{1} and Z_{2}, respectively) and the ferromagnetic properties of the Flayer (thickness and polarization parametrized respectively by r and h) are the quantities governing the device physics. Despite the number of parameters, the high sensitivity of the conductance features on the parameter evolution excludes the possibility of degenerate fittings as it has been widely verified during data analysis.
Discussion
In summary, using the Bogoliubovde Gennes formalism, we studied the transport properties of NF/S device in which thin ferromagnetic layer (of the order of ξ_{F}) is deposited on superconducting electrode, realizing a doublebarrier structure. The spectroscopic features (i.e., differential conductance spectra) calculated within the theoretical model show a sensitive dependence on the ferromagnet properties (thickness and polarization). This peculiar behavior, originated by the resonant proximity effect, suggests the possibility to use Resonant Andreev Spectroscopy on F/S bilayer as a powerful characterization method to precisely probe local ferromagnetic properties. As a preliminary test of the theoretical expectations, we realized point contact Andreev reflection spectroscopy experiment by pushing a metallic tip on PdNi/Nb bilayer. Differential conductance spectra for several contacts have been measured at low temperature, showing a variety of features (ZBCP, conductance dips at the gap edge and subgap structures) not expected in singlebarrier PCAR theories. Theoretical fittings allowed to consistently explain all measurements: ferromagnet quantities, namely the thickness and the polarization, have been estimated in accordance with the characterization measurements and the relevant literature.
Methods
The F/S bilayers were grown insitu by a threetarget ultrahigh vacuum dc magnetron sputtering on Al_{2}O_{3} substrates (5 mm × 5 mm) in Argon pressure (few μbar) depositing first a 40 nm thick Nb layer and then a 4 nm thick Pd_{0.84}Ni_{0.16} layer. Resistive transition measurements showed that the critical temperature of the bilayer was about 7.2 K compared to = 8.2 K of a reference (40 nm thick) Nb film. Magnetic and transport characterization of the bilayers has been widely addressed in previous works^{34,35,36} estimating ξ_{F} = 3–4 nm^{35,37}, i.e. the length scale over which the oscillation^{37,38,39,40,41,42} of the superconducting order parameter is expected in the Fside of the S/F bilayer. The thickness of the ferromagnetic layer covering the superconductor has been chosen to meet the condition d ≈ ξ_{F}, in order to favor the coherent interplay between magnetic and superconducting correlations.
PCAR experiments have been performed by pushing a mechanically etched gold tip on the ferromagnetic side of the PdNi/Nb bilayer. The tip is installed on a screw driven chariot to gently approach the sample. The inset is introduced in a liquid helium cryostat to measure currentvoltage (IV) characteristics in the temperature range between 4.2 K and 10 K by conventional fourprobe technique. Differential conductance spectra are obtained by numerical derivative. By varying the position and the pressure of the tip on the sample we obtained contact resistances in the range 2 Ω–10 Ω. The transport regime through the contact can be easily estimated by using Wexler’s formula^{43} R = 4ρl/(3πa^{2}) + ρ/(2a) in which the first term gives the Sharvin resistance^{44} describing the ballistic regime and the second one is the Maxwell^{45} resistance describing the diffusive regime. The dominating term will depend on the contact dimension a, the resistivity ρ of the sample and the mean free path l of the charge carriers. For ρ = 13 μΩcm (as resulting by direct measurements) and considering that ρl = 3.72 × 10^{−6} μΩcm^{2} for niobium^{46,47}, it comes out that the minimum contact dimension is a ≃ 8 nm. The ratio l/a < 1 gives indication for diffusive contact. However, the extension of BTK theory to diffusive contact has been proven^{25,26,48} to correctly identify the effect of P on the conductance spectra.
The observation of conductance dips has been often ascribed to the formation of thermal contacts. On the other hand, they have also been reported in presence of F/S and N/S point contacts experiments in which the thermal heating is excluded^{5,49,50,51}. We do exclude the thermal regime due to experimental evidences in the data. In fact, in the thermal regime, a reduced gap energy is expected^{52} with respect the bulk value, while no evidence of gap reduction is found. Moreover, as reported in ref. 52, the presence of heating effects implies a rising spectroscopic background already at 2Δ_{Nb} while we report a flat background well visible up to four times the gap energy. A further experimental observation against the possible formation of a thermal contact is given in Fig. 3 where temperature dependence of conductance spectra is reported. According to D. Daghero et al.^{53} the presence of temperature independent high energy tails of the conductance spectra as well as the Andreev signal disappearing at the same critical temperature measured for the bulk system by resistivity characterization demonstrate that the contact resistance has no contribution due to the Maxwell term.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Romeo, F. et al. Resonant Andreev Spectroscopy in normalMetal/thinFerromagnet/Superconductor Device: Theory and Application. Sci. Rep. 5, 17544; doi: 10.1038/srep17544 (2015).
References
Johnson, P. D. Spinpolarized photoemission. Rep. Prog. Phys. 60, 1217–1304 (1997).
Meservey, R. & Tedrow, P. M. Spinpolarized electron tunneling. Phys. Rep. 283, 173–243 (1994).
de Jong, M. J. M. & Beenakker, C. W. J. Andreev Reflection in FerromagnetSuperconductor Junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1657–1660 (1995).
Andreev, A. F. The Thermal Conductivity of the Intermediate State in Superconductors. Sov. Phys. JETP 19, 1228–1231 (1964).
Soulen, R. J. et al. Measuring the Spin Polarization of a Metal with a Superconducting Point Contact. Science 282, 85–88 (1998).
Upadhyay, S. K., Palanisami, A., Louie, R. N. & Buhrman, R. A. Probing Ferromagnets with Andreev Reflection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3247–3250 (1998).
Strijkers, G. J., Ji, Y., Yang, F. Y., Chien, C. L. & Byers, J. M. Andreev reflections at metal/superconductor point contacts: Measurement and analysis. Phys. Rev. B 63, 104510 (2001).
Kant, C. H., Kurnosikov, O., Filip, A. T., LeClair, P., Swagten, H. J. M. & De Jonge, W. J. M. Origin of spinpolarization decay in pointcontact Andreev reflection. Phys. Rev. B 66, 212403 (2002).
Nadgorny, B. et al. Transport spin polarization of NixFe1−x: Electronic kinematics and band structure. Phys. Rev. B 61, R3788–R3791 (2000).
Nadgorny, B. et al. Origin of high transport spin polarization in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3: Direct evidence for minority spin states Phys. Rev. B 63, 184433 (2001).
Ji, Y., Chien, C. L., Tomioka, Y. & Tokura, Y. Measurement of spin polarization of single crystals of La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 and La0.6Sr0.4MnO3 . Phys. Rev. B 66, 012410 (2002).
Raychaudhuri, P., Mackenzie, A. P., Reiner, J. W. & Beasley, M. R. Transport spin polarization in SrRuO3 measured through pointcontact Andreev reflection. Phys. Rev. B 67, 020411(R) (2003).
Nadgorny B. et al. Measurements of spin polarization of epitaxial SrRuO3 thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 427–429 (2003).
DeSisto, W. J., Broussard, P. R., Ambrose, T. F., Nadgorny, B. E. & Osofsky M. S. Highly spinpolarized chromium dioxide thin films prepared by chemical vapor deposition from chromyl chloride. Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3789–3791 (2000).
Löfwander, T., Grein, R. & Eschrig, M. Is CrO2 Fully Spin Polarized? Analysis of Andreev Spectra and Excess Current. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 207001 (2010).
Blonder, G., Tinkham, M. & Klapwijk, T. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting micorconstrictions: excess current, chargeimbalance and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 25, 4515–4532 (1982).
PerézWillard F. et al. Determining the current polarization in Al/Co nanostructured point contacts. Phys. Rev. B 69, 140502(R) (2004).
De Gennes, P. G. Superconductivity of metals and alloys. (AddisonWesley Publishing Company, 1966).
Volkov, A. F., Zaitsev, A. V. & Klapwijk, T. M. Proximity effect under nonequilibrium conditions in doublebarrier superconducting junctions. Physica C 210, 21–34 (1993).
Yokoyama, T., Tanaka, Y. & Golubov, A. A. Resonant proximity effect in normal metal/diffusive ferromagnet/superconductor junctions. Phys. Rev. B 73, 094501 (2006).
Cottet, A., HuertasHernando, D., Belzig, W. & Nazarov, Yu. V. Spindependent boundary conditions for isotropic superconducting Greens functions. Phys. Rev. B 80, 184511 (2009).
Tanaka, Y. & Kashiwaya, S. Theory of Tunneling Spectroscopy of dWave Superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3451–3454 (1995).
Wei, J. Y. T., Yeh, N.C., Garrigus, D. F. & Strasik, M. Directional Tunneling and Andreev Reflection on Yba2Cu3O7−δ Single Crystals: Predominance of dWave Pairing Symmetry Verified with the Generalized Blonder, Tinkham and Klapwijk Theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2542–2545 (1998).
Daghero, D. & Gonnelli, R. S. Probing multiband superconductivity by pointcontact spectroscopy. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 23, 043001 (2010).
Woods, G. T. et al. Analysis of pointcontact Andreev reflection spectra in spin polarization measurements. Phys. Rev. B 70, 054416 (2004).
Chen, T. Y., Huang, S. X. & Chien, C. L. Pronounced effects of additional resistance in Andreev reflection spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 81, 214444 (2010).
Ashcroft, N. W. & Mermin, N. D. Solid State Physics. (Brooks Cole, New York, 1976).
Xu, J. H., Miller, J. H. & Ting, C. S. Conductance anomalies in a normalmetaldwave superconductor junction. Phys. Rev. B 53, 3604–3612 (1996).
Giazotto, F., Taddei, F., Fazio, R. & Beltram, F. Ultraefficient cooling in ferromagnetsuperconductor microrefrigerators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3784–3786 (2002).
Zhu, Y., Sun, Q. & Lin, T. Extraordinary temperature dependence of the resonant Andreev reflection. Phys. Rev. B 64, 134521 (2001).
Magnée, P. H. C., van der Post, N., Kooistra, P. H. M., Van Wees, B. J. & Klapwijk, T. M. Enhanced conductance near zero voltage bias in mesoscopic superconductorsemiconductor junctions. Phys. Rev. B 50, 4594–4599 (1994).
Dagan, Y., Kohen, A., Deutscher, G. & Revcolevschi, A. Absence of Andreev reflections and Andreev bound states above the critical temperature. Phys. Rev. B 61, 7012–7016 (2000).
Arham, H. Z., Khaire, T. S., Loloee, R., Pratt, W. P. & Birge, N. O. Measurement of spin memory lengths in PdNi and PdFe ferromagnetic alloys. Phys. Rev. B 80, 174515 (2009).
Cirillo C. et al. Superconducting proximity effect and interface transparency in Nb/PdNi bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 72, 144511 (2005).
Cirillo, C., Ilyina, E. A. & Attanasio, C. Static and dynamic properties of the vortex lattice in superconductor/weak ferromagnet bilayers. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 24, 024017 (2011).
Romano, P., Polcari, A., Cirillo, C. & Attanasio, C. Nonmonotonic behaviour of the superconducting order parameter in Nb/PdNi bilayers observed through point contact spectroscopy. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 25, 095017 (2012).
Fominov, Ya. V., Chtchelkatchev, N. M. & Golubov, A. A. Nonmonotonic critical temperature in superconductor/ferromagnet bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 66, 014507 (2002).
Radović, Z., Ledvij, M., DobrosavljevićGrujić, L., Buzdin, A. I. & Clem, J. R. Transition temperatures of superconductorferromagnet superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 44, 759–764 (1991).
Jiang, J. S., Davidović, D., Reich, D. H. & Chien, C. L. Oscillatory Superconducting Transition Temperature in Nb/Gd Multilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 314–317 (1995).
Zdravkov V. et al. Reentrant Superconductivity in Nb/Cu1−xNix Bilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 057004 (2006).
Buzdin, A. Density of states oscillations in a ferromagnetic metal in contact with a superconductor. Phys. Rev. B 62, 11377–11379 (2000).
Kontos, T., Aprili, M., Lesueur, J. & Grison, X. Inhomogeneous Superconductivity Induced in a Ferromagnet by Proximity Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 304–307 (2001).
Wexler, A. The size effect and the nonlocal Boltzmann transport equation in orifice and disk geometry. Proc. Phys. Soc. 89, 927–941 (1966).
Sharvin, Y. V. On the possible method for studying Fermi surfaces. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 48, 984–985 (1965).
Maxwell, J. C. Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism. (Clarendon, Oxford, 1904).
Goodman, B. B. & Kuhn, G. J. Influence des défauts étendus sur les propriétés supraconductrices du niobium. Phys. Paris 29, 240–252 (1968).
Garwin, E. L. & Rabinowitz, M. Resistivity Ratio of Niobium Superconducting Cavities. Appl. Phys. Lett. 20, 154–156 (1972).
Mazin, I. I., Golubov, A. A. & Nadgorny, B. Probing spin polarization with Andreev reflection: A theoretical basis. J. Appl. Phys. 89, 7576–7578 (2001).
DeGrave J. P. et al. Spin Polarization Measurement of Homogeneously Doped Fe1−xCoxSi Nanowires by Andreev Reflection Spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 11, 4431–4437 (2011).
SanGiorgio, P., Reymond, S., Beasley, M. R., Kwon, J. H. & Char, K. Anomalous Double Peak Structure in Superconductor/Ferromagnet Tunneling Density of States. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 237002 (2008).
Boden, K. M., Pratt, W. P. & Birge N. O. Proximityinduced densityofstates oscillations in a superconductor/strongferromagnet system. Phys. Rev. B 84, 020510(R) (2011).
Blonder, G. E. & Tinkham, M. Metallic to tunneling transition in CuNb point contacts. Phys. Rev. B 27, 112–118 (1983).
Daghero, D. et al. Strongcoupling dwave superconductivity in PuCoGa5 probed by pointcontact spectroscopy. Nature Phys. 3, 786 (2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
F.R. developed theoretical model, performed numerical fittings, contributed to data analysis and wrote the paper; F.G. designed the experiment, performed PCAR measurements and numerical fittings, did data analysis and wrote the paper; R.C. contributed to develop the theoretical model; A.D.B. and A.P. helped with the data analysis; C.C. and C.A. provided the bilayers and their electrical characterization; P.R. contributed to the experiment design, measurements and data analysis. The manuscript was revised by all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Romeo, F., Giubileo, F., Citro, R. et al. Resonant Andreev Spectroscopy in normalMetal/thinFerromagnet/Superconductor Device: Theory and Application. Sci Rep 5, 17544 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17544
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17544
This article is cited by

Electron waiting times in hybrid junctions with topological superconductors
Scientific Reports (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.