Introduction

Succinic acid is a dicarboxylic acid produced as an intermediate of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and also as one of the fermentation products of anaerobic metabolism. It has also numerous applications in agricultural, food and pharmaceutical industries1. It is classified as the most promising chemical among the 12 bio-based chemicals, by the US Department of Energy2.

Succinic acid is produced chemically via hydrogenation of maleic acid, or through fermentation of glucose from renewable feedstock. Recent studies have shown that Escherichia coli is another promising mean for succinic acid production, because the bacterium can be genetically engineered with relative ease and has the advantage of fast growth3,4,5,6.

In E. coli, succinic acid is synthesized by CO2 fixation-based carboxylation of C3 metabolites. One of the most important C3 metabolites is phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP). PEP can be converted to oxaloacetic acid (OAA) by either PEP carboxylase (PPC) or PEP carboxykinase (PCK)7. And then OAA is further converted to succinate through malate dehydrogenase, fumarase and fumarate reductase. Previous studies have demonstrated that overexpression of genes related to CO2 fixation, such as PPC8, PCK9 and pyruvate carboxylase (PYC)10, increases succinate production efficiently in E. coli. Because the PCK activity is subject to glucose catabolite repression in E. coli11, PPC is recognized as the primary enzyme for fermentative production of succinate12. Overexpression of ppc gene from Sorghum vulgare in E. coli strain SB2020 increased succinate production by 1.5 folds13.

Another critical step in succinic acid production is the CO2 uptake by cells. In E. coli, the active substrate of PPC is the bicarbonate anion HCO3āˆ’ 14. CO2 crosses the cell membrane into the cytoplasm by passive diffusion and is converted into HCO3āˆ’ 14. The slow and passive diffusion of CO2 into cells is a limiting step for enhancing succinic acid production. Recently, several strategies were developed through increasing the concentration of CO2 in the fermentation broth14,15 or accelerating the intracellular conversion of dissolved CO2 into bicarbonate to improve the supply of HCO3āˆ’, in order to enhance succinate production16. However, no literature has been found to improve succinate biosynthesis by directly enhancing HCO3āˆ’ transmembrane transport in E. coli.

Several HCO3āˆ’ active transporters have been discovered in cyanobacteria17,18. These HCO3āˆ’ transporters actively transport HCO3āˆ’ into cells, resulting in accumulation of HCO3āˆ’ inside the cell. Two of the efficient transporters are represented by SbtA and BicA19. The Na+-dependent SbtA transporter was originally identified in the cyanobacterium, Synechocystis PCC6803. It is a single gene transporter with relatively high affinity for HCO3āˆ’, requiring Na+ for maximal HCO3āˆ’ uptake activity18. The BicA transporter is also Na+-dependent and unrelated to SbtA. It has a relatively low transport affinity but high flux rate19.

In an attempt to further enhance succinic acid production, we employed a dual expression system, in which genes regulating both PEP carboxylation and CO2 uptake were overexpressed individually or co-overexpressed. Our results showed that the best succinate production was attained only when one CO2 transport and one CO2 fixation gene were co-expressed. This work provides useful information for metabolic regulation of CO2 to improve succinate production.

Materials and Methods

Strains and plasmids

Strains and plasmids used in this study were summarized in Table 1. Primers were summarized in Table 2. E. coli strain DH5Ī± was used for plasmid construction. Strain AFP111 was kindly provided by Prof. Clark, Southern Illinois University20. Synechocystis PCC6803 was provided by Prof. Xu, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences21 and used as the sbtA, bicA and ppc gene donor. Bacillus thuringiensis BMB171 was provided by Prof. Sun, Huazhong Agricultural University22 and used as the pck gene donor. Plasmids pTrc99A and pACYC184 were used as the foundation plasmids for construction and overexpression.

Table 1 Strains and plasmids used in this study.
Table 2 Primers used in this studya.

Plasmid construction procedure

The sbtA was amplified from Synechocystis PCC6803 genome by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All PCRs were carried out based on the manufacturerā€™s recommended conditions (Bio-Rad, USA). The forward and reverse primers is SbtA-SacI-H and SbtA-B-His, respectively (Table 2). The PCR product was digested with SacI and BamHI and ligated into the plasmid pTrc99A. The ligated, ampicillin (Amp) resistant vector was designated as pTrc-sbtA. The bicA was amplified from Synechocystis PCC6803 genome by PCR with primer BicA- EcoRI-H and BicA-B-His (Table 2) and was digested with EcoRI and BamHI and then ligated into the plasmid pTrc99A (designated as pTrc-bicA). The trc-sbtA was amplified from pTrc-sbtA by PCR with primers P-trc-XbaI and SbtA-SalI-His and digested with XbaI and SalI and then ligated into the plasmid pTrc-bicA (designated as pTrc-bicA-sbtA). The ppc gene was amplified from Synechocystis PCC6803 genome by PCR with primers ppc-EcoRI and ppc-BamHI, digested with EcoRI and BamHI and then ligated into the plasmid pTrc99A (designated as pTrc-ppc). The trc-sbtA was digested with XbaI and SalI and then ligated into the plasmid pTrc-ppc (designated as pTrc-ppc-sbtA). The bicA was amplified by PCR with primers BamHI-SD-BicA and BicA-XbaI, digested with XbaI and BamHI and then ligated into the plasmid pTrc-ppc (designated as pTrc-ppc-bicA). The trc-sbtA was digested with XbaI and SalI and then ligated into the plasmid pTrc-ppc-sbtA (designated as pTrc-ppc-bicA-sbtA). The pck was amplified from Bacillus thuringiensis BMB171 genome by PCR with primers pck-SacI and pck-HindIII. The PCR product was digested with SacI and HindIII and then inserted into the plasmid pTrc99a yielding the recombinant plasmid pTrc-pck. To construct plasmid pACYC-trc-pck, the pck expression cassette with promoter trc from plasmids pTrc-pck was digested with DrdI and BclI and then ligated into the plasmid pACYC184 yielding the plasmid pACYC-trc-pck. All plasmids were introduced into E. coli AFP111 strain by chemical transformation. The colonies were screened by PCR amplification and confirmed for cloning accuracy by DNA sequence analysis. The transformants were designated as Tang1501 to Tang1518 (Table 1).

Expression and detection of membrane protein

Cells of E. coli AFP111 transformed with various plasmids were grown in LB medium (10ā€‰g Lāˆ’1 tryptone, 5ā€‰g Lāˆ’1 yeast extract and 5ā€‰g Lāˆ’1 NaCl) at 37ā€‰Ā°C to OD600ā€‰=ā€‰1.0. Gene overexpression was induced by addition of 10ā€‰Ī¼M isopropyl-Ī²-D- thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (Biosharp) and grew overnight. Cells were centrifuged at 4,600ā€‰Ć—ā€‰g for 15ā€‰min and pellets were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4). Cells were sonicated on ice for 15ā€‰min (a working period of 5ā€‰s in a 7-s interval for each cycle) at a power output of 200ā€‰W by an ultrasonic disruptor (J92-II, Xinzhi, Ningbo, China). Unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 10,000ā€‰Ć—ā€‰g for 15ā€‰min. Supernatant was further centrifuged at 100,000ā€‰Ć—ā€‰g for 60ā€‰min. Finally, pellets (membranes) were resuspended in 100ā€‰mM Tris buffer (pH 6.8) (ANGUS), 10% Ī²-mercaptoethanol (AMRESCO), 4% Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (Biosharp) and stored at āˆ’80ā€‰Ā°C.

The membrane proteins (SbtA and BicA) isolated from cells were fractionated through 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and electrotransferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane for Western blot analysis. The membrane was incubated at room temperature for 2ā€‰h with a mouse His-tag monoclonal antibody (Jackson, USA) at a dilution of 1:2000, rinsed and then incubated with alkaline phosphatase (AP) labeled goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Jackson, USA) at room temperature for 2ā€‰h at a dilution of 1:2000.

HCO3āˆ’ transport activity

HCO3āˆ’ transport was determined by radioactive NaH14CO323. Gene overexpression was induced by addition of 10ā€‰Ī¼M IPTG and cultured overnight. Cells were centrifuged at 4,600ā€‰Ć—ā€‰g for 15ā€‰min and pellets were resuspended in fresh fermentation medium (pH 7.0) (Composition of medium was listed in section 2.6) to OD600ā€‰=ā€‰10.0. A stock solution of radioactive NaH14CO3 (China Isotope and Radiation Corporation) in NaHCO3 (5ā€‰mM, 1.0ā€‰Ī¼Ci Ī¼Lāˆ’1) was added to cells at a final concentration of 0.185ā€‰mM. Cells were mixed and 50ā€‰Ī¼L aliquots were transferred to centrifuge tubes and incubated at 37ā€‰Ā°C. Bicarbonate uptake was stopped by adding 1ā€‰mL non-radioactive NaH12CO3 (0.5ā€‰M). The cells were collected through filter membrane (0.45-Ī¼m, Jinteng, China) and the radioactivity was determined in a scintillation counter (Perkin Elmer, USA).

RT-qPCR

Cells of E. coli AFP111 transformed with plasmids were collected at 14ā€‰h during the dual-phase fed-batch fermentation. The total RNA was extracted with Bacterial RNA Kit (Omega). The total RNA fragments were reverse-transcribed into cDNA by using PrimeScriptTM RT reagent Kit (Takara). 16ā€‰S rRNA was selected as the endogenous control. All cDNA samples were diluted to a final concentration of 10ā€‰ng/Ī¼L. Two-Step RT-PCR Kit with SYBR green was used with a thermal cycler (iCycler, Bio-Rad) for RT-qPCR. Primers were used at a final concentration of 0.2ā€‰Ī¼M and 10ā€‰ng of cDNA was used as template in each 20ā€‰Ī¼L reaction. The threshold cycles for each sample were calculated from the fluorescence data with proprietary software (Bio-Rad). The fold changes for comparing the relative gene expression levels to those of the controls in the different tissues and at the different developmental stages were determined using the 2āˆ’Ī”Ī”Ct method. We defined a threshold value, i.e. increases greater than 2-fold in the amount of transcripts relative to empty plasmids control samples were considered significant.

Measurements of enzyme activity

Crude extracts for all enzyme assays were prepared by harvesting 10ā€‰mL of the cell culture from the reactor by centrifugation at 4,600ā€‰Ć—ā€‰g and 4 Ā°C for 10ā€‰min. After resuspending the cell pellets with 100ā€‰mM Tris-HCl, (pH 7.4), cells were sonicated on ice for 8ā€‰min (a working period of 8ā€‰s in a 3-s interval for each cycle) at a power output of 200ā€‰W by an ultrasonic disruptor (J92-II, Xinzhi, Ningbo, China). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 10,000ā€‰Ć—ā€‰g for 20ā€‰min at 4ā€‰Ā°C. The supernatant was further centrifuged at 10,000ā€‰Ć—ā€‰g for 10ā€‰min and the resulting supernatant was used to assay enzyme activity. The PEP carboxylase (PPC) and PEP carboxykinase (PCK) activities were assayed by measuring the changes of NADH using absorbance at 340ā€‰nm24. PPC was monitored in a 100ā€‰Ī¼L reaction mixture containing: 66ā€‰mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 10ā€‰mM MgCl2, 10ā€‰mM NaHCO3, 0.15ā€‰mM NADH (Biosharp), 0.4ā€‰U malate dehydrogenase (Amresco) and 10ā€‰Ī¼L cell extract. The PCK activity was determined in a 100ā€‰Ī¼L mixture containing: 100ā€‰mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), 75ā€‰mM NaHCO3, 16ā€‰mM MgCl2, 10ā€‰mM ADP (Biosharp), 0.2ā€‰mM NADH, 0.4ā€‰U malate dehydrogenase and 10ā€‰Ī¼l cell extract24. The mixture was incubated for 15ā€‰min at 37ā€‰Ā°C to activate PPC or PCK, after which the reaction was started by the addition of 5ā€‰mM PEP. 1ā€‰U of PPC or PCK activity was defined as the amount of enzyme needed to oxidize 1ā€‰Ī¼M NADH per min at room temperature. The total protein concentration in crude cell extract was measured by Bradfordā€™s method25 with bovine serum albumin as a standard. Enzyme assays were performed in triplicate and if the discrepancy was greater than 10%, another pair of assays was performed.

Fed-batch culture

During strain construction, cells of E. coli AFP111 were grown aerobically at 37ā€‰Ā°C in LB medium. Preculture and fermentation medium consisted of the following components (g Lāˆ’1): glucose, 35; yeast extract, 10; tryptone, 20; K2 HPO4Ā·3ā€‰H2O, 0.90; KH2PO4, 1.14; (NH4)2SO4, 3.0; MgSO4Ā·7ā€‰H2O, 0.30 and CaCl2Ā·2ā€‰H2O, 0.25. Antibiotics were included as necessary at the following concentrations: 100ā€‰Ī¼g mLāˆ’1 ampicillin, 50ā€‰Ī¼g mLāˆ’1 kanamycin and 10ā€‰Ī¼g mLāˆ’1 chloroamphenicol. Protein expression was induced by the addition of IPTG to a final concentration of 10ā€‰Ī¼M.

The first pre-culture medium (50ā€‰mL) was prepared in a 250-mL flask and a colony from a plate culture was inoculated and incubated for 12ā€‰h at 37ā€‰Ā°C on a rotary shaker at 250ā€‰rpm. For the second pre-culture, 50ā€‰mL of pre-culture medium was prepared in a 250-mL flask, inoculated with 100ā€‰Ī¼L of the first pre-culture broth and incubated for 12ā€‰h at 37ā€‰Ā°C on a rotary shaker at 250ā€‰rpm.

Dual-phase fed-batch fermentation was conducted with 5ā€‰L of initial fermentation medium in a 7.5ā€‰L Bioflo 115 fermenter (New Brunswick Scientific). A 5% (v vāˆ’1) inoculum was used from the second preculture. At the beginning of the aerobic growth phase, 35ā€‰g Lāˆ’1 glucose was added. During growth, oxygen-enriched air (DA-5001, Dynamic, China) was sparged at 0.1ā€“0.4 vvm under agitation of 300ā€“800ā€‰rpm to maintain the dissolved oxygen (DO) above 40%. When its concentration dropped below 1ā€‰g Lāˆ’1, the aerobic growth phase was terminated by switching the inlet gas composition to oxygen-free CO2 at 0.2ā€‰mL mināˆ’1. The pH was controlled at 7.0 with 20ā€‰g Lāˆ’1 MgCO3 and 5ā€‰M NaOH. Agitation was reduced to 400ā€‰rpm and initial glucose was maintained at 40ā€‰g Lāˆ’1. When the residual sugar concentration dropped below 10ā€‰g Lāˆ’1, a concentrated sterile glucose solution (800ā€‰g Lāˆ’1) was fed into the media to maintain the residual glucose concentration around 40ā€‰g Lāˆ’1.

Determination of cell mass and measurements of residual sugar and succinate concentration were performed as previously reported26.

Six cultures were carried out simultaneously in stirred-tank bioreactors with different engineered strains under identical experimental conditions, which ensured accurate head-to-head comparisons. The results presented here were reproducible in another experiment (data not shown).

Succinate determination

For succinate determination, 1ā€‰mL of methanol and 1ā€‰mL of acetonitrile were added to 1ā€‰mL of fermentation broth to remove proteins and the sample was incubated at 4ā€‰Ā°C overnight. After centrifugation at 10,800ā€‰Ć—ā€‰g for 30ā€‰min, the supernatants were filtered through a 0.22-Ī¼m filter and analyzed by high-performance Dionex Ultimate 3000 liquid chromatographer (Thermo Scientific) using a Reprosil-Pur Basic C18 column. The optimized mobile phase was 5ā€‰mM KH2PO4 water solution, with pH adjusted to 2.8 by H3PO4. The column oven temperature was maintained at 40ā€‰Ā°C and the flow rate was maintained at 1ā€‰mL mināˆ’1. The detection wave was 210ā€‰nm.

Data analyses

All experiments were performed in triplicate. Data were expressed as meansā€‰Ā±ā€‰standard deviations and they were analyzed using SPSS 19.0 for Windows software. One-way analysis of variance was performed. Scheffe multiple comparison procedure (alphaā€‰ā‰¤ā€‰0.05) was used for individual variables to compare means and to assess significant differences.

Results and Discussion

Individual regulation of CO2 fixation or transport

Effect of PPC and PCK on succinate production

PEP carboxylation is one of the rate-limiting reactions in succinate production27. To improve succinate production, ppc from Synechocystis PCC6803 and pck from B. thuringiensis BMB171 were overexpressed individually or in combination.

As shown in Fig. 1aā€“c, overexpression of ppc or/and pck apparently failed to affect cell growth, pattern of glucose consumption and succinate biosynthesis significantly. The succinate production obtained with Tang1501 (pACYC184), Tang1502 (ppc), Tang1503 (pck) and Tang1504 (ppc and pck) was between 62.6 and 67.3ā€‰g Lāˆ’1. The concentrations of succinate were decreased after 70 or 80ā€‰h. Although carbon source feeding was performed, nitrogen sources, inorganic salts and vitamins may be insufficient at the end of the fermentation. Lack of nutrients may limit cellular activity and metabolic efficiency. There was a similar phenomenon could be observed in the previous report28.

Figure 1
figure 1

Effect of CO2 fixation genes expression on the cell growth (a), glucose consumption (b), the succinate production (c), relative expression levels of ppc and pck (d) and the enzyme activities of the PCK and PPC (e) in fed-batch fermentation. Symbols for E. coli strains: Tang1501 (pACYC184) (open triangle, ), Tang1502 (ppc) (black triangle, ), Tang1503 (pck) (open circle, ā—‹), Tang1504 (ppc and pck) (black circle, ). Error bars show standard deviation (nā€‰=ā€‰3). Different letters (e.g., aā€“c) were assigned to significantly different groups and for the results between two groups, a combination of the two corresponding letters was used (e.g., a,b).

The RT-qPCR analysis indicated that ppc and pck was overexpressed. Although the expression of ppc and pck exhibited 43.7- to 90.9-fold higher levels compared with that of empty plasmid control (Fig. 1d) and the activity of PPC and PCK was significantly improved by individual or combined expression of ppc and pck genes (Fig. 1e). The overexpression of PPC and/or PCK showed insignificantly improved effect on the succinate biosynthesis (Fig. 1c). It was probably due to low substrate supply. As the substrate for carboxylation enzyme, the diffusion of HCO3āˆ’ through the cell membrane was the key limiting process for succinate formation14. Permeation of HCO3āˆ’ through the lipid membrane is insignificant. Therefore, the speed and flux of substrate supply might be limited by the passive diffusion transportation mode of HCO3āˆ’. Although the activity of carboxylation enzyme was increased, it was difficult to improve the carboxylation reaction flux due to insufficient HCO3āˆ’.

Overexpression of BicA or SbtA significantly increases HCO3āˆ’ uptake but decreases succinate production

In order to increase the HCO3āˆ’ uptake, two heterogeneous HCO3āˆ’ transport genes of Synechocystis PCC6803, bicA and sbtA were overexpressed in E. coli AFP111 cells. The BicA and SbtA were chosen for their highly conserved adaptability for CO2 assimilation and for the relative ease of genetic manipulation compared with other transporters.

In this work, a trc promoter was used to control the BicA and SbtA expression, so their expression levels were not affected by environmental factors, such as inorganic carbon species19,29, or light30,31. As shown in Fig. 2a, no BicA or SbtA expression was detected in Tang1505 (pTrc99A), while both BicA and SbtA were detected in Tang1508 (sbtA and bicA), indicating the feasibility of overexpression of these genes in E. coli. Overall, the expression of BicA was higher than that of SbtA. It was probably due to a wider codon adaptation and more stable mRNA of bicA (data not shown). From the transcription level, the expression of bicA was higher, correspondingly more BicA was synthetized. On the other hand, BicA is distinguishable as an extant member of the SulP family of anion transporters in eukaryotes and prokaryotes32,33. Some close homologs of BicA had been proved existing in several bacteria with high identity19. The reason why BicA could be better expressed in E. coli than SbtA, was probably because there is BicA homolog in E. coli.

Figure 2
figure 2

BicA and SbtA expression via His tag (a) and the uptake of HCO3āˆ’ in E. coli AFP111 (b). Overexpressed proteins were detected by western-blots. Lane 1: Tang1505 (pTrc99A), lane 2: Tang1506 (sbtA), lane 3: Tang1507 (bicA), lane 4: Tang1508 (sbtA and bicA). M corresponds to the molecular weight marker lanes. Symbols for E. coli strains: Tang1505 (pTrc99A) (open triangle, ), Tang1506 (sbtA) (black triangle, ), Tang1507 (bicA) (open circle, ā—‹), Tang1508 (sbtA and bicA) (black circle, ).

As shown in Fig. 2b, HCO3āˆ’ transport activity was significantly improved in overexpression of sbtA (Tang1506), bicA (Tang1507) or both (Tang1508). After the expression of SbtA or BicA, the active transport system of HCO3āˆ’ was introduced into E. coli and the E. coli cells acquired the ability for active HCO3āˆ’ transportation. The highest transport flux of 71.08ā€‰Ī¼mol HCO3āˆ’ gāˆ’1 cell was obtained with Tang1506 (sbtA). It was 1.4-times higher than that of Tang1505 (pTrc99A). The HCO3āˆ’ uptake in cells overexpressing BicA was lower than that of SbtA expressing cells. It were different from previous reports. In cyanobacteria, BicA has a moderate photosynthetic uptake affinity for HCO3āˆ’ (K0.5 of ā‰ˆ38ā€‰Ī¼M). It was able to support a high photosynthetic flux rate, while the SbtA transporter supported a low flux rate but with a high uptake affinity (K0.5ā€‰<ā€‰2 ĀµM)19.

As shown in Fig. 3a, overexpression of bicA and/or sbtA hinders cell growth and the inhibitory effect of SbtA on cell growth was less than that caused by BicA. It probably due to the highly detrimental effect on the host cells caused by the overexpression of the membrane protein34. The expression of BicA was higher than that of SbtA. The increased expression of heterologous membrane proteins interferenced the cellular morphology and function. As a result, cell growth was negatively affected. The time profiles of glucose obtained by mutants were similar, except for Tang1507 (bicA) (Fig. 3b).

Figure 3
figure 3

Time courses of dry cell weight (a), residual sugar concentration (b), the production of succinate (c), relative expression levels of sbtA, bicA, ppc and pck (a) and the specific activities of the PCK and PPC (e) under the expression of the HCO3āˆ’ transporters in fed-batch fermentation. T The symbols for E. coli strains are the same as those in Fig. 2. Error bars show standard deviation (nā€‰=ā€‰3). Different letters (e.g., (a,b)) were assigned to significantly different groups and for the results between two groups.

The effect of the expression of BicA and SbtA on succinate production was shown in Fig. 3c. It showed that overexpression of BicA or SbtA, or both had a negative effect on the succinate biosynthesis. One possible reason for this decrease was attributed to the negative effect associated with the high concentration of HCO3āˆ’ on the overall cell metabolism. BicA and SbtA are both Na+-dependent HCO3āˆ’ transporters18,19. Adequate Na+ levels were provided by the NaOH, which was used to control pH, to ensure steady expression of the transporters. HCO3āˆ’ accumulated in the cell, while CO2 fixation was not enhanced to effectively fix the intracellular HCO3āˆ’. Thus the original intracellular metabolic environment was disordered by the increased intracellular pH, which was caused by the increased intracellular HCO3āˆ’. This observation was supported by the slower cell growth (Fig. 3a).

As shown in Fig. 3d, when the two genes were expressed, the sbtA and bicA was up-regulated by 8- to 618-fold, respectively. And when sbtA was expressed, pck was up-regulated by 2.1-fold and 2.4-fold. Correspondingly, the enzyme activity of PCK in Tang1506 (sbtA) (0.16ā€‰U mgāˆ’1) or Tang1508 (sbtA and bicA) (0.16ā€‰U mgāˆ’1) was higher than that in Tang1505 (pTrc99A) (0.12ā€‰U mgāˆ’1) (Fig. 3e). This suggested that the PCK was activated by the expression of SbtA, but not BicA. No significant difference of PPC enzyme activity was found among the different strains (Pā€‰>ā€‰0.05).

Collaborative metabolic regulation of CO2 transport and fixation

Co-expression of CO2 transport and CO2 fixation genes

Succinate production involves two major steps: CO2 uptake and CO2 fixation. To achieve higher production of succinate, the two steps should be in succession, linked closely and complementing each other. To investigate whether the activation of CO2 transport and CO2 fixation had a synergistic effect in improving succinate production, co-expression of both genes was carried out by the combined expression of 1) two transport genes coupled with one fixation gene; 2) two fixation genes coupled with one transportation gene; and 3) two transport genes coupled with two fixation genes.

As shown in Fig. 4a, all strains showed similar rates of dry cell weight increase. The glucose consumption rates of Tang1512 (sbtA, ppc and pck) and Tang1513 (bicA, ppc and pck) were lower than that of Tang1509 (pTrc99A and pACYC184), Tang1510 (sbtA, bicA and ppc) or Tang1511 (sbtA, bicA and pck) (Fig. 4b). As shown in Fig. 4c, the highest succinate production (57.9ā€‰g Lāˆ’1) among the strains that expressed any combination of genes was obtained from Tang1511 (sbtA, bicA and pck), which was still lower than that of Tang1509 (pTrc99A and pACYC184). Correspondingly, lower succinate productivity and succinate yield on dry cell weight (DCW) was also observed when multiple CO2 transport and fixation genes were overexpressed (Table 3). Compared with the succinate production obtained by CO2 transport overexpression (34.8ā€“44.1ā€‰g Lāˆ’1), when the CO2 transport and CO2 fixation genes were co-expressed, succinate production was improved (49.9ā€“57.9ā€‰g Lāˆ’1). It probably because HCO3āˆ’ transported into cells under the overexpression of transport proteins was promptly fixed. The metabolic disturbance caused by high concentration of intracellular HCO3āˆ’ was partially eliminated. However, the negative effect caused by membrane protein expression still exists. It suggested that the flux of transportation or fixation was still uncoordinated and unstable. It also suggests that a better coordinated regulation of CO2 transport and CO2 fixation is important in metabolism.

Table 3 Effect of collaborative regulation of CO2 transportation and fixation on the production of succinate.
Figure 4
figure 4

Time courses of dry cell weight (a), residual sugar concentration (b) and the production of succinate (c), relative expression levels of sbtA, bicA, ppc and pck (d) and the specific activities of the PCK and PPC (e) under the collaborative expression of multiple HCO3āˆ’ transporters and CO2 fixation genes in fed-batch fermentation. Symbols for E. coli strains: Tang1509 (pTrc99A and pACYC184) (open triangle, ), Tang1510 (sbtA, bicA and ppc) (black triangle, ), Tang1511 (sbtA, bicA and pck) (open circle, ā—‹), Tang1512 (sbtA, ppc and pck) (black circle, ), Tang1513 (bicA, ppc and pck) (open square, ), Tang1514 (sbtA, bicA, ppc and pck) (black square, ). Different letters (e.g., (aā€“c)) were assigned to significantly different groups and for the results between two groups, a combination of the two corresponding letters was used (e.g., a,b and b,c).

As shown in Fig. 4d, when the CO2 transport and fixation genes were individually or combinedly expressed, the sbtA, bicA, ppc or pck was up-regulated by more than 2-fold, correspondingly. The significant higher activity of PCK was obtained by recombined strains and the overexpression of PPC and/or PCK showed insignificantly improved effect on the succinate biosynthesis (Fig. 4e).

Co-expression of single CO2 transport and fixation gene

In order to find out the best combination of CO2 transport and CO2 fixation that has a synergistic effect in improving succinate production, we further investigated the expression of single transport gene coupled with single fixation gene. As shown in Fig. 5a, the biomass production was similar, except that Tang1517 (sbtA and pck) grew slightly better, which may be due to the increased HCO3āˆ’ supplement and increased PCK activity leading to more active cell metabolism. The higher PCK activity leads to more OAA and ATP formation and the energy conserved by PCK was beneficial for cell growth. In addition, no significant difference was observed for glucose consumption among the four strains, Tang1515 (sbtA and ppc), Tang1516 (bicA and ppc), Tang1517 (sbtA and pck) and Tang1518 (bicA and pck) (Fig. 5b).

Figure 5
figure 5

Time courses of dry cell weight (a), residual sugar concentration (b), the production of succinate (c), relative expression levels of sbtA, bicA, ppc and pck (d) and the specific activities of the PCK and PPC (e) under the collaborative expression of single HCO3āˆ’ transporter and single CO2 fixation gene in fed-batch fermentation. Symbols for E. coli strains: Tang1515 (sbtA and ppc) (black triangle, ), Tang1516 (bicA and ppc) (open circle, ā—‹), Tang1517 (sbtA and pck) (black circle, ), Tang1518 (bicA and pck) (open square, ). Error bars show standard deviation (nā€‰=ā€‰3). Different letters (e.g., (aā€“e) were assigned to significantly different groups and for the results between two groups.

The succinate production was also greatly improved when a single transport and a single fixation gene were co-expressed (Fig. 5c). The highest succinate production was 73.4ā€‰g Lāˆ’1 from Tang1517 (sbtA and pck), which was 13.3%, 66.4% and 15.0% higher than that obtained from Tang1503 (pck), Tang1506 (sbtA) and Tang1509 (pTrc99A and pACYC184), respectively. This result indicates that the best combination of transport and fixation genes was represented by sbtA and pck. HCO3āˆ’ transported into cells under the overexpression of SbtA was promptly fixed by PCK. Transport and fixation flux balanced. In addition, the succinate productivity, succinate yield on DCW and succinate yield on glucose obtained by Tang1517 attained the highest value (Table 3). When bicA was co-expressed with ppc (Tang1516) or pck (Tang1518), succinate production was lower than that obtained by Tang1509 (pTrc99A and pACYC184). However, compared with the succinate production obtained from Tang1507 (bicA) (Fig. 3c), the inhibitory effect on succinate biosynthesis caused by BicA alone was attenuated by combined expression with CO2 fixation gene. It suggested that the collaborative metabolic regulation was effective on improving the utilization rate of CO2.

As shown in Fig. 5d, when the CO2 transport and fixation gene were combinedly expressed, the sbtA, bicA, ppc or pck was up-regulated by more than 2-fold, correspondingly. The PCK activities of Tang1515 (sbtA and ppc), Tang1516 (bicA and ppc), Tang1517 (sbtA and pck) and Tang1518 (bicA and pck) were 0.19, 0.16, 0.22 and 0.14ā€‰U mgāˆ’1 protein, respectively (Fig. 5e). This result was positively correlated with the succinate biosynthesis (Fig. 5c). The corresponding PPC activities were 0.14, 0.10, 0.11 and 0.15ā€‰U mgāˆ’1 protein, respectively. When sbtA and ppc were expressed together, there was no obvious improvement in PPC activity probably due to various factors affecting the activity of PPC, such as aspartate and citrate35. On the other hand, PPC has a Km for bicarbonate of 0.1ā€‰Ī¼M, whereas PCK has a Km for bicarbonate of 13ā€‰Ī¼M36,37. PPC is more sensitive to the concentration of bicarbonate than PCK and carries out PEP carboxylation at a lower concentration of HCO3āˆ’. As the active substrate for PPC, when the concentrations of intracellular HCO3āˆ’ was at a high level, PPC activity was likely limited owing to substrate inhibition.

PCK catalyzed the reaction at a higher concentration of HCO3āˆ’ 14. As previously reported, when 20ā€‰g Lāˆ’1 of NaHCO3 was added, succinic acid production in recombinant E. coli overexpressing PCK was 2.2-fold higher than that observed in the wild-type strain38. Interestingly, we noted that when SbtA was expressed, PCK was activated (Fig. 3d,e). It may be the reason why the higher activity of PCK reached the peak value when sbtA and pck were expressed together.

Conclusions

To improve succinate production, two sets of genes, one for CO2 fixation (ppc and pck) and another for CO2 transport (sbtA and bicA), were overexpressed individually or in various combinations in E. coli. Our results showed that overexpression of either set of genes individually did not improve succinate production. To our surprise, when the two sets of genes (at least 3 genes) were co-expressed, no improvement on succinate production was observed. However, when only one gene from each gene set was co-expressed, succinate production was significantly increased, especially for gene combination of pck and sbtA, which reached the highest succinate production (73.4ā€‰g Lāˆ’1) compared with other strains. Based on our results, we believe that collaborative regulation of CO2 transport and fixation is critical for succinate production. Imbalanced gene expression located upstream and downstream of the metabolic pathway may cause harmful effects to cell growth and succinate production.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Zhu, L.-W. et al. Collaborative regulation of CO2 transport and fixation during succinate production in Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 5, 17321; doi: 10.1038/srep17321 (2015).