Abstract
Quantum dots (QDs) have become one of the most promising luminescent materials for tracking viral infection in living cells. However, several issues regarding how QDs interact with the virus remain unresolved. Herein, the effects of Glutathione (GSH) capped CdTe QDs on virus were investigated by using pseudorabies virus (PRV) as a model. One-step growth curve and fluorescence colocalization analyses indicate that CdTe QDs inhibit PRV multiplication in the early stage of virus replication cycle by suppressing the invasion, but have no significant effect on the PRV penetration. Fluorescence spectrum analysis indicates that the size of QDs is reduced gradually after the addition of PRV within 30 min. Release of Cd2+ was detected during the interaction of QDs and PRV, resulting in a decreased number of viruses which can infect cells. Further Raman spectra and Circular Dichroism (CD) spectroscopy analyses reveal that the structure of viral surface proteins is altered by CdTe QDs adsorbed on the virus surface, leading to the inhibition of virus replication. This study facilitates an in-depth understanding of the pathogenic mechanism of viruses and provides a basis for QDs-labeled virus research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
With remarkable photostability and brightness, quantum dots (QDs) have generated much excitement for their various potential applications in tracking viral infection in living cells1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Viral components labeled with QDs have been used as imaging probes to reveal the infection details and dynamic interactions between the viruses and cellular components8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. For instance, a host-cell-assisted labeling strategy for enveloped viruses has been established based on the natural assembly process of viruses inside the host cells17. It was also reported that Streptavidin-conjugated QDs were used to label the nucleocapsid of recombinant baculovirus, achieving the real-time monitoring of the interaction of single virus with late endosomes and the subsequent nucleocapsid transporting into cell nucleus18.
Recently, the cytotoxicity and biosafety assessment of QDs have become a major research focus. A number of studies have reported the toxicity of QDs on cells and bacteria19,20,21. Li et al. found that CdTe QDs and CdTe/CdS/ZnS QDs can induce autophagy, which is a key factor leading to the decrease of metabolic activity of PC12 cells22. Liu et al. investigated the toxicity of CdTe QDs on hematopoiesis and found that QDs with a smaller size showed greater hematopoiesis toxicity and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) may be one of the underlying causes23. Tsoi et al. proposed that QD cytotoxicity is induced by the production of ROS, which can damage cell membrane, cellular proteins, mitochondria, nucleus and DNA24. Peng et al. systematically analyzed the cytotoxicity, the cellular uptake efficiency and elimination of specific QDs and found that the up-regulation of cell stress-related genes by QDs was closely related to the intracellular amounts of QDs, which is determined by the physicochemical properties of QDs25. Slaveykova et al. explored the effect of carboxyl-CdSe/ZnS core/shell QDs on metal decontamination capacity of C. metallidurans and found that the presence of QDs induced the increase of Cu and Pb uptake by C. metallidurans26. Although QDs have been successfully studied in terms of cells and bacterial toxicity, the interaction between CdTe QDs and the virus remains largely unknown.
Pseudorabies virus (PRV), a herpesvirus that causes Aujeszky’s disease in swine, has been prevalent worldwide since its first discovery in 192027. The broad host range as well as the high morbidity and mortality rates have caused tremendous economic losses in swine production all over the world28. PRV, together with HSV-1, HSV-2 and varicellazoster virus (VZV), belongs to the α-Herpesvirinae subfamily29. Due to its remarkable infectivity to synaptic connections of neurons, PRV is widely used not only as a model to understand α-herpesvirus biology but also as a neuroanatomical tracing tool30. In the present study, we investigated the possible effects of CdTe QDs on virus using PRV as a model and explored the related mechanism, aiming to gain insights into the pathogenic mechanism of viruses and provide a basis for QDs-labeled virus research.
Results and Discussion
Characterization of GSH-CdTe QDs and PRV
As shown in Fig. 1a,b, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images confirmed that the as-prepared GSH-capped CdTe QDs were spherical particles with an average size of 3.2 ± 0.8 nm. The maximum fluorescence emission peak of CdTe QDs and the maximum absorption peak of CdTe QDs locate at 624 nm and 580 nm, respectively (Fig. 1c).
The hydrodynamic size distribution of PRV was analyzed by dynamic light scattering (DLS). As shown in Fig. S1, the average Dh of PRV was 190.1 nm (105 PFU/mL), which is in agreement with the size of PRV previously reported31.
Cytotoxicity of GSH-CdTe QDs on PK-15 cells
To evaluate the potential cytotoxic effects of CdTe QDs on PK-15 cells, MTT assay was performed. Briefly, 80 nM and 160 nM CdTe QDs prepared with original materials were added to the cells cultured in 96-well plates and incubated for 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 h, respectively. The results from Fig. 2 demonstrated that 160 nM CdTe QDs were highly toxic to PK-15 cells, whereas nearly no cytotoxicity was detected in the cells treated with 80 nM CdTe QDs. Therefore, 80 nM CdTe QDs were used in the subsequent experiments.
Influence of GSH-CdTe QDs on PRV replication
To clarify the influence of CdTe QDs on PRV replication, one-step single curve was examined in the presence of 80 nM CdTe QDs. The titers of intracellular and supernatant viruses pretreated with or without CdTe QDs were analyzed by plaque assays, respectively. As shown in Fig. 3a, the intracellular infectious virus, whether pretreated with CdTe QDs or not, was first detected at 4 hour post infection (hpi). However, when compared with the control, the PRV pretreated with CdTe QDs showed a remarkably decreased number of progeny infectious viruses in the early period of virus multiplication. At the end of virus multiplication (after 18 hpi), there was no apparent difference between the control and QDs-PRV. In Fig. 3b, the first infectious progeny virus in the control and QDs-PRV was detected at 5 and 6 hpi, respectively. When adsorbed on the surface of PRV, CdTe QDs may significantly delay the onset of progeny virus formation at the beginning of virus multiplication. In addition, CdTe QDs may also remarkably reduce the number of infectious progeny viruses in the early period of virus multiplication. However, the inhibitory effect of CdTe QDs on the progeny virus disappeared at the late stage of virus multiplication (after 18 hpi).
The effect of CdTe QDs on PRV replication was further investigated by using a recombinant PRV expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP-PRV) at 12 and 24 hpi. A large number of green fluorescence signals were detectable with GFP-PRV at 12 hpi (Fig. 4a), but the number significantly decreased under the treatment of 80 nM CdTe QDs (Fig. 4d). These results indicated that a large amount of progeny viruses were suppressed at the early phase when the GFP-PRV was pretreated with CdTe QDs. However, no significant difference in GFP-PRV infection was observed between the treated group (Fig. 4g) and the control group (Fig. 4j) at 24 hpi. For further analysis, cellular nuclei were counterstained with 1.0 μg/mL of DAPI and blue fluorescence signals were collected (Fig. 4b,e,h,k).
Entry process plays a key role in virus infection32. Fig. 5 shows the effect of CdTe QDs on the virus entry process, which demonstrates a significant dose-dependent inhibitory effect of CdTe QDs on PRV. It is well known that the entry of herpesvirus virions into cells is mediated by the viral glycoproteins33,34. First, the PRV virions are attached to the extracellular matrix by the interaction of gC with heparan sulphate proteoglycans, then the virion-cell interaction is stabilized by the binding of PRV gD to specific cellular receptors35,36 and finally, PRV gB, gH and gL mediate the viral envelope and the cellular plasma membrane fusion to release viral capsid and tegument into the cell cytoplasm31. The cell receptor binding sites were located on the surface of a virus, which is essential for virus attachment and entry into the host cells. It is possible that QDs on the surface of a virus can affect/inhibit the virus entry efficiency by combining its receptors and blocking its ligands37. Therefore, CdTe QDs may inhibit the virus entry by altering the protein structure on the virus surface.
In order to investigate the effect of CdTe QDs on viral penetration, different concentrations of CdTe QDs were added to incubate with the PRV for 30 min after PRV adsorption on the cell surface for 2 h at 4 °C. As shown in Fig. 6, the titer of PRV did not show significant decrease with increasing concentrations of CdTe QDs. These results suggest that CdTe QDs can not inhibit the viral penetration, demonstrating that the effect of CdTe QDs on PRV proliferation is not the result of CdTe QD cytotoxicity.
Effect of charge and size of QDs on the entry of PRV
In a previous study, we found that GSH-CdTe QDs had obvious inhibitory effect on the virus entry process, which is extremely significant for virus infection. To further characterize the factors that may influence the entry process, we tested the interaction of differently charged CdTe QDs with PRV. Zeta-potential measurements were performed using a Malvern zetasizer to determine the surface charge. GSH terminated with sulfhydryl groups, provides negatively charges on the surface of QDs and the zeta-potential of GSH-capped CdTe QDs was −42.6 ± 6.32 mV. Positively charged QDs with zeta-potential value of 5.79 ± 0.66 mV was prepared by addition of ethylene imine polymer (PEI) to GSH-capped CdTe QDs according to the previously reported method38. Fig. 7a shows the effects of negatively and positively charged CdTe QDs during the virus entry process. It can be seen that positively charged CdTe QDs have more inhibitory effect than the negatively charged ones.
We also investigated the effect of QDs-511, QDs-554 and QDs-624 (Fig. S2) on the entry of PRV. As displayed in Fig. 7b, the relative titer of PRV decreased regularly as the size of GSH–CdTe QDs increased. This result is similar to that of a previous study on the effect of different sizes of CdTe QDs on human serum albumin39.
Mechanism of interaction between QDs and viruses
The fluorescence spectra of CdTe QDs were recorded after the addition of PRV for different time intervals. As shown in Fig. 8, the maximum emission peaks of CdTe QDs are shifted to blue wavelength in the presence of PRV. It is well known that the sizes of CdTe QDs are related to their maximum emission peaks40. The blue shift of the maximum emission peaks indicates the decrease of QD sizes when PRV was added into the QD solution. When CdTe QDs are exposed to the PRV, they will be adsorbed on the surface of viral surface proteins. This process will change the surface properties and size of QDs, which is similar to the interaction of CdTe QDs with other proteins39. Lin et al. also observed a significant blue shift in the interaction between CdTe QDs and silk protein41.
The interaction between CdTe QDs and PRV also lead to the release of Cd2+, which was detected by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES)42. The results indicated that 4.1 ± 0.3 μM Cd2+was released when PRV was exposed to 80 nM GSH-CdTe QDs (624 nm). The effect of Cd2+ on relative titer of PRV during the virus entry process was investigated. As shown in Fig. S3, a significant dose-dependent inhibitory effect was observed during the virus entry process. When the concentration of Cd2+ was 10 μM, the relative titre of PRV was 64.8%. However, the relative titre of PRV was just 4.3% after the treatment with 80 nM GSH-CdTe QDs (Fig. 5). These results indicate that CdTe QDs have stronger inhibitory effects than Cd2+ during the virus entry process, implying the inhibition of CdTe QDs on PRV can not be solely attributed to the toxic effect of Cd2+ release.
Raman spectrum is a powerful tool to study the interaction of nanoparticles and biomolecules43. To further verify the interaction between CdTe QDs and PRV, an experiment focusing on the Raman shift of PRV and QDs-PRV was performed. PRV (107 PFU/mL) was pretreated with 80 nM CdTe QDs (624 nm) for 1 h at 4 °C and then analyzed by Raman spectra. Raman spectra of both PRV (control) and QDs-PRV are shown in Fig. 9 within the spectral region from 220 to 1800 cm–1. Obvious changes were observed in the shifts of 277 cm–1, 643 cm–1, 770 cm–1, 1045 cm–1, 1208 cm–1, 1305 cm–1, 1450 cm–1 and 1620 cm–1. The bands at 1208 cm–1 and 1305 cm–1 in the amide III region were due to the C-N stretching and N-H bending of the proteins44 and the spectra in the regions of 643 cm–1, 1450 cm–1 and 1620 cm–1 correspond to C-C twisting mode of tyrosine45, a CH2 bending vibration of the proteins46 and C=C stretching of proteins47, respectively. This result indicated that the protein structures were changed by the addition of CdTe QDs.
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy is a powerful tool to study the conformational change of the secondary structure of protein molecules. To further verify the influence of CdTe QDs on the protein structure on virus surface, far-UV CD spectra of PRV in the absence and presence of CdTe QDs were analyzed. As shown in Fig. S4, the CD spectra of PRV have two negative bands at 208 and 222 nm, which are the characteristic spectra for α-helical structure of protein. The peaks at 208 and 222 nm are related to the π-π* and n-π* transition of peptide bonds in the α-helix, respectively48. The negative peaks of PRV were decreased after treatment with CdTe QDs, which also indicates that the structure of the viral surface protein was dramatically altered by CdTe QDs.
Based on the aforementioned results, it can be deduced that CdTe QDs may inhibit the proliferation of PRV through two possible models: after adsorption on the PRV surface, a) CdTe QDs change the structure of viral surface proteins and inhibit the PRV entry efficiency; and b) CdTe QDs results in the release of Cd2+, which leads to the decrease of the number of the viruses which can infect cells. Although the biological characteristics of the virus are affected by QDs, the cytotoxicity of QDs can be reduced by varying the particle size, shape, surface charge, hydrophobicity and the nature of the surface ligands to make QDs fit for labeling virus49,50.
Conclusions
In this study, we demonstrate that GSH-capped CdTe QDs can inhibit virus multiplication by using PRV as a model. The inhibitory effect of CdTe QDs is not derived from the cytotoxicity, but more likely the result of the interaction between CdTe QDs and the virus. When adsorbed on the virus surface, CdTe QDs change the structure of viral surface proteins and subsequently lead to the release of Cd2+. This study facilitates the further understanding of the pathogenic mechanism of viruses and provides useful information for QDs-labeled virus research.
Methods
Preparation of GSH-CdTe QDs
Glutathione (GSH) capped CdTe QDs were prepared as previously reported with minor modifications51. Briefly, 0.3384 g CdCl2 and 0.5523 g GSH were dissolved in 150 mL deionized water and the pH of solution was adjusted to 10.5 by adding 1.0 M NaOH solution. Then, the mixture was stirred under nitrogen for 20 min, followed by a rapid injection of 0.0630 g sodium citrate, 0.0655 g sodium tellurite and 0.6026 g sodium borohydride into the reaction flask one by one and then the reaction mixture was heated to reflux for 6 h under nitrogen atmosphere. Next, the resulting CdTe QD solution was purified through precipitation from ethanol at the rate of 1:1 and the mixture was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min. Finally, the precipitate was resuspended in an equal volume of deionized water and stored at 4 °C for further use.
Cells and viruses
PK-15 cells, a Porcine kidney cell line extremely permissive for PRV infection, were incubated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in a humid incubator with 37 °C/5% CO2. Pseudorabies virus (PRV) strain Ea (a wild virulent strain separated in China) was propagated in confluent monolayer of PK-15 cells in the presence of DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS at 37 °C for 2–3 days. When the cytopathic effect of PRV became apparent, the cell culture was submitted to a triple freezing/thawing cycle for a full release of the viruses and the cell debris was filtered by centrifugation at 3000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min8.
Virus titer assay
The titer of PRV was determined by plaque assays as reported previously52. Briefly, PK-15 cells were incubated in 6-well plates in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS for 24 h to reach 95% confluence. Subsequently, virus samples were 10-fold serially diluted (1.0 mL) with DMEM (2% FBS) and then injected into the confluent monolayer of cells for 1 h at 37 °C. After removing the inoculum and washing PK-15 cells three times with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4), the cells were covered with 2XDMEM mixed with 1.8% low melting point agarose (Promega) at the rate of 1:1 supplemented with 3% FBS, followed by incubation in a 5% CO2 incubator for 3–4 days. Finally, PK-15 cells were stained with neutral red mixed with PBS at a 1:1 ratio for 2 h at 37 °C53. Virus titer was obtained by calculating the average plaque number from three independent experiments and was presented by the plaque-forming unit (PFU/mL).
MTT assay
104 PK-15 cells per well were seeded in 96-well plates for 24 h to reach 100% confluence and different concentrations of CdTe QDs were added to PK-15 cells at 37 °C. After 1 h incubation, the inoculum was removed and replaced with DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS (100 μL/well). After incubation for different periods of time (3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 12 h and 24 h), the supernatant was discarded and 20 μL MTT reagent (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide, Sigma) was added to each well. After culturing for 4 h at 37 °C, MTT-reagent was removed and the formazan precipitate was dissolved with DMSO (150 μL/well). Absorbance at 570 nm was measured by using an Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) microplate reader54. All measurements were done with a replicate number of eight wells per concentration. Viability was calculated by comparison with control cultures of normal PK-15 cells without exposure to CdTe QDs.
One-step growth curve
80 nM CdTe QDs were mixed with PRV for 1 h at 4 °C and then added to PK-15 cells at an multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2 for 1 h. After infection for 1 h at 37 °C, the infected cells were treated for 60 s with pH 3.0 citrate buffer to stop the penetration of virions55. The infected cells were washed twice with PBS and then supplemented with medium (2% FBS) for further incubation. Medium supernatant and cell lysate were collected separately at 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 hpi and stored at −80 °C. The supernatant and cell lysate were subjected to a triple freezing/thawing cycle to release viruses completely and the cell lysate was centrifuged at 3000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min to remove cell debris. The infectivity of supernatants and cell lysate collected at different infection time periods was detected by plaque assays to establish a one-step growth curve56.
Entry assay
PRV was mixed with different concentrations of CdTe QDs or Cd2+ at 4 °C for 1 h and then added into 6-well plates containing confluent PK-15 cell monolayers, followed by 1 h incubation at 37 °C/5% CO2 to allow PRV entry and infection. In order to inactivate the non-entryed virions, the medium was discarded and the cells were treated with pH 3.0 citrate buffer (60 s). The cell monolayers were gently washed three times with PBS to remove the citrate buffer55. Finally, cells were overlaid with 1.8% Bacto agar mixed with 2XDMEM (1:1) supplemented with 3% FBS57. The concentration of PRV was determined by virus titer assay.
Fluorescence colocalization analyses
To verify whether CdTe QDs can inhibit PRV proliferation, PK-15 cells were infected with GFP-PRV and QDs-GFP-PRV at an MOI of 2. At 12 and 24 hpi, supernatants were removed and cells were washed three times with ice-cold PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. Next, the paraformaldehyde was discarded and ice-cold methanol (−20 °C) was added immediately to permeabilize the cells for 10 min at room temperature, followed by three times of rinsing with PBS, then staining with 1.0 mg/mL 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Beyotime) for 15 min in dark room and then another three times of rinsing with PBS. All of the above steps were carried out in a shaker with the minimum speed58. Finally, the fluorescent images were visualized using a Zeiss LSM 510 Meta confocal laser-scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss Micro imaging GmbH, Germany).
Penetration assay
The cell monolayers were incubated with PRV for 2 h at 4 °C and after 2 h adsorption, the inoculum was removed and the cells were supplemented with DMEM (2% FBS) containing different concentrations of CdTe QDs, followed by 30 min incubation at 37 °C to initiate viral penetration55. Finally, the supernatant was discarded and the remaining steps were similar to those for entry assays.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Du, T. et al. Probing the interactions of CdTe quantum dots with pseudorabies virus. Sci. Rep. 5, 16403; doi: 10.1038/srep16403 (2015).
References
Cui, Z. Q. et al. Quantum dot-aptamer nanoprobes for recognizing and labeling influenza A virus particles. Nanoscale 3, 2454–2457 (2011).
Zheng, Y., Gao, S. & Ying, J. Y. Synthesis and cell-imaging applications of glutathione-capped CdTe quantum dots. Adv. Mater. 19, 376–380 (2007).
Liu, S. L. et al. High-efficiency dual labeling of influenza virus for single-virus imaging. Biomaterials 33, 7828–7833 (2012).
Li, F. et al. Imaging viral behavior in Mammalian cells with self-assembled capsid-quantum-dot hybrid particles. Small 5, 718–726 (2009).
Zhang, P. et al. Click-functionalized compact quantum dots protected by multidentate-imidazole ligands: conjugation-ready nanotags for living-virus labeling and imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 8388–8391 (2012).
Zhang, F. et al. Self-biotinylation and site-specific double labeling of baculovirus using quantum dots for single-virus in-situ tracking. Biomaterials 34, 7506–7518 (2013).
Joo, K. I. et al. Enhanced real-time monitoring of adeno-associated virus trafficking by virus–quantum dot conjugates. ACS nano 5, 3523–3535 (2011).
Zheng, L. L. et al. In situ labelling chemistry of respiratory syncytial viruses by employing the biotinylated host-cell membrane protein for tracking the early stage of virus entry. Chem. Commun. 50, 15776–15779 (2014).
Zhang, Y. et al. Encapsulating quantum dots into enveloped virus in living cells for tracking virus infection. ACS Nano 7, 3896–3904 (2013).
Pan, H. et al. Noninvasive visualization of respiratory viral infection using bioorthogonal conjugated near-infrared-emitting quantum dots. ACS Nano 8, 5468–5477 (2014).
Hao, J., Huang, L. L., Zhang, R., Wang, H. Z. & Xie, H. Y. A mild and reliable method to label enveloped virus with quantum dots by copper-free click chemistry. Anal. Chem. 84, 8364–8370 (2012).
Huang, L. L. et al. A new stable and reliable method for labeling nucleic acids of fully replicative viruses. Chem. Commun. 48, 2424–2426 (2012).
Joo, K. I. et al. Site-specific labeling of enveloped viruses with quantum dots for single virus tracking. ACS Nano 2, 1553–1562 (2008).
Liu, S. L. et al. Three-dimensional tracking of Rab5- and Rab7-associated infection process of influenza virus. Small 10, 4746–4753 (2014).
Liu, H., Liu, Y., Liu, S., Pang, D. W. & Xiao, G. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis in living host cells visualized through quantum dot labeling of infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus. J. Virol. 85, 6252–6262 (2011).
Huang, L. L. & Xie, H. Y. Progress on the labeling and single-particle tracking technologies of viruses. Analyst 139, 3336–3346 (2014).
Huang, B. H. et al. Surface labeling of enveloped viruses assisted by host cells. ACS Chem. Biol. 7, 683–688 (2012).
Wen, L. et al. Labeling the nucleocapsid of enveloped baculovirus with quantum dots for single-virus tracking. Biomaterials 35, 2295–2301 (2014).
Clift, M. J. et al. Quantum dot cytotoxicity in vitro: an investigation into the cytotoxic effects of a series of different surface chemistries and their core/shell materials. Nanotoxicology 5, 664–674 (2011).
Nguyen, K. C., Seligy, V. L. & Tayabali, A. F. Cadmium telluride quantum dot nanoparticle cytotoxicity and effects on model immune responses to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nanotoxicology 7, 202–211 (2013).
Clift, M. J., Boyles, M. S., Brown, D. M. & Stone, V. An investigation into the potential for different surface-coated quantum dots to cause oxidative stress and affect macrophage cell signalling in vitro. Nanotoxicology 4, 139–149 (2010).
Li, X. et al. Autophagy-sensitized cytotoxicity of quantum dots in PC12 cells. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 3, 354–359 (2014).
Liu, T. et al. Hematopoiesis toxicity induced by CdTe quantum dots determined in an invertebrate model organism. Biomaterials 35, 2942–2951 (2014).
Tsoi, K. M., Dai, Q., Alman, B. A. & Chan, W. C. Are quantum dots toxic? Exploring the discrepancy between cell culture and animal studies. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 662–671 (2012).
Peng, L. et al. Cellular uptake, elimination and toxicity of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in HepG2 cells. Biomaterials 34, 9545–9558 (2013).
Slaveykova, V. I., Pinheiro, J. P., Floriani, M. & Garcia, M. Interactions of core-shell quantum dots with metal resistant bacterium Cupriavidus metallidurans: consequences for Cu and Pb removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 261, 123–129 (2013).
Nauwynck, H., Glorieux, S., Favoreel, H. & Pensaert, M. Cell biological and molecular characteristics of pseudorabies virus infections in cell cultures and in pigs with emphasis on the respiratory tract. Vet. Res. 38, 229–241 (2007).
Gu, Z. et al. A novel inactivated gE/gI deleted pseudorabies virus (PRV) vaccine completely protects pigs from an emerged variant PRV challenge. Virus Res. 195, 57–63 (2015).
Backovic, M. et al. Structure of a core fragment of glycoprotein H from pseudorabies virus in complex with antibody. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22635–22640 (2010).
Hogue, I. B., Bosse, J. B., Hu, J. R., Thiberge, S. Y. & Enquist, L. W. Cellular mechanisms of alpha herpesvirus egress: live cell fluorescence microscopy of pseudorabies virus exocytosis. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1004535 (2014).
Pomeranz, L. E., Reynolds, A. E. & Hengartner, C. J. Molecular biology of pseudorabies virus: impact on neurovirology and veterinary medicine. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. R. 69, 462–500 (2005).
Marsh, M. & Helenius, A. Virus entry: open sesame. Cell 124, 729–740 (2006).
Sodeik, B., Ebersold, M. W. & Helenius, A. Microtubule-mediated transport of incoming herpes simplex virus 1 capsids to the nucleus. J. Cell. Biol. 136, 1007–1021 (1997).
Granzow, H., Klupp, B. G. & Mettenleiter, T. C. Entry of pseudorabies virus: an immunogold-labeling study. J. Virol. 79, 3200–3205 (2005).
Rauh, I. & Mettenleiter, T. C. Pseudorabies virus glycoproteins gII and gp50 are essential for virus penetration. J. Virol. 65, 5348–5356 (1991).
Fehler, F., Herrmann, J., Saalmüller, A., Mettenleiter, T. & Keil, G. Glycoprotein IV of bovine herpesvirus 1-expressing cell line complements and rescues a conditionally lethal viral mutant. J. Virol. 66, 831–839 (1992).
Zheng, Z. & Wang, H. Tracking viral infection: will quantum dot encapsulation unveil viral mechanisms? Nanomedicine 8, 1225–1227 (2013).
Gui, R., An, X. & Huang, W. An improved method for ratiometric fluorescence detection of pH and Cd2+ using fluorescein isothiocyanate-quantum dots conjugates. Anal. Chim. Acta 767, 134–140 (2013).
Yang, B., Liu, R., Hao, X., Wu, Y. & Du, J. Effect of CdTe quantum dots size on the conformational changes of human serum albumin: results of spectroscopy and isothermal titration calorimetry. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 155, 150–158 (2013).
Sheng, Z., Han, H., Hu, X. & Chi, C. One-step growth of high luminescence CdTe quantum dots with low cytotoxicity in ambient atmospheric conditions. Dalton Trans. 39, 7017–7020 (2010).
Lin, N. et al. Construction of white-light-emitting silk protein hybrid films by molecular recognized assembly among hierarchical structures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 5284–5290 (2014).
Lai, L. et al. Necrotic cell death induced by the protein-mediated intercellular uptake of CdTe quantum dots. Chemosphere 135, 240–249 (2015).
Yang, Q., Liang, J. & Han, H. Probing the interaction of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with bovine serum albumin by spectroscopic techniques. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 10454–10458 (2009).
Chan, J. W. et al. Micro-Raman spectroscopy detects individual neoplastic and normal hematopoietic cells. Biophys. J. 90, 648–656 (2006).
Stone, N., Kendall, C., Shepherd, N., Crow, P. & Barr, H. Near-infrared Raman spectroscopy for the classification of epithelial pre-cancers and cancers. J. Raman Spectrosc. 33, 564–573 (2002).
Salman, A., Shufan, E., Zeiri, L. & Huleihel, M. Characterization and detection of Vero cells infected with Herpes Simplex Virus type 1 using Raman spectroscopy and advanced statistical methods. Methods 68, 364–370 (2014).
Faolain, E. O. et al. Raman spectroscopic evaluation of efficacy of current paraffin wax section dewaxing agents. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 53, 121–129 (2005).
Zhao, L. et al. New strategy for the evaluation of CdTe quantum dot toxicity targeted to bovine serum albumin. Sci. Total Environ. 407, 5019–5023 (2009).
Nagy, A. et al. Comprehensive analysis of the effects of CdSe quantum dot size, surface charge and functionalization on primary human lung cells. ACS Nano 6, 4748–4762 (2012).
Das, G. K., Stark, D. T. & Kennedy, I. M. Potential toxicity of up-converting nanoparticles encapsulated with a bilayer formed by ligand attraction. Langmuir 30, 8167–8176 (2014).
Yuan, J., Guo, W., Yin, J. & Wang, E. Glutathione-capped CdTe quantum dots for the sensitive detection of glucose. Talanta 77, 1858–1863 (2009).
Luo, R. et al. Antiviral activity of type I and type III interferons against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV). Antivir. Res. 91, 99–101 (2011).
Bi, J. et al. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus induces IL-1beta production depending on TLR4/MyD88 pathway and NLRP3 inflammasome in primary porcine alveolar macrophages. Mediat. Inflamm. 2014, 403515 (2014).
Lovric, J., Cho, S. J., Winnik, F. M. & Maysinger, D. Unmodified cadmium telluride quantum dots induce reactive oxygen species formation leading to multiple organelle damage and cell death. Chem. Biol. 12, 1227–1234 (2005).
Gescher, K., Hensel, A., Hafezi, W., Derksen, A. & Kühn, J. Oligomeric proanthocyanidins from Rumex acetosa L. inhibit the attachment of herpes simplex virus type-1. Antivir. Res. 89, 9–18 (2011).
Huang, L. L. et al. A fast and biocompatible living virus labeling method based on sialic acid-phenylboronic acid recognition system. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 406, 2687–2693 (2014).
Duan, E. et al. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection triggers HMGB1 release to promote inflammatory cytokine production. Virology 468–470, 1–9 (2014).
Wang, D. et al. MiR-125b reduces porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus replication by negatively regulating the NF-κB pathway. PloS One 8, e55838 (2013).
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the support for this research by National Nature Science Foundation of China (31372439, 31225027, 21175051), Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2014CFA009) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2013PY043). We are also thankful to Prof. Zuoxiong Liu and Prof. Hanchang Zhu for their editing of the language.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.D. and K.C. performed the experiments. J.L. and S.X. analyzed the results. All authors designed experiments and contributed to the writing of the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Du, T., Cai, K., Han, H. et al. Probing the interactions of CdTe quantum dots with pseudorabies virus. Sci Rep 5, 16403 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16403
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16403
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.