Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Neuronal Cells Cultured on Chemically-Defined Hydrogels for Sensitive In Vitro Detection of Botulinum Neurotoxin

Pellett, Sabine; Schwartz, Michael P.; Tepp, William H.; Josephson, Richard; Scherf, Jacob M.; Pier, Christina L.; Thomson, James A.; Murphy, William L.; Johnson, Eric A.

doi:10.1038/srep14566

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 28 September 2015

Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Neuronal Cells Cultured on Chemically-Defined Hydrogels for Sensitive In Vitro Detection of Botulinum Neurotoxin

Sabine Pellett¹,
Michael P. Schwartz²,
William H. Tepp¹,
Richard Josephson³,
Jacob M. Scherf¹,
Christina L. Pier¹,
James A. Thomson^4,5,6,
William L. Murphy^2,7 &
…
Eric A. Johnson¹

Scientific Reports volume 5, Article number: 14566 (2015) Cite this article

5609 Accesses
25 Citations
12 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) detection provides a useful model for validating cell-based neurotoxicity screening approaches, as sensitivity is dependent on functionally competent neurons and clear quantitative endpoints are available for correlating results to approved animal testing protocols. Here, human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neuronal cells were cultured on chemically-defined poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogels formed by “thiol-ene” photopolymerization and tested as a cell-based neurotoxicity assay by determining sensitivity to active BoNT/A1. BoNT/A1 sensitivity was comparable to the approved in vivo mouse bioassay for human iPSC-derived neurons and neural stem cells (iPSC-NSCs) cultured on PEG hydrogels or treated tissue culture polystyrene (TCP) surfaces. However, maximum sensitivity for BoNT detection was achieved two weeks earlier for iPSC-NSCs that were differentiated and matured on PEG hydrogels compared to TCP. Therefore, chemically-defined synthetic hydrogels offer benefits over standard platforms when optimizing culture conditions for cell-based screening and achieve sensitivities comparable to an approved animal testing protocol.

Dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticle-induced nanotoxicity in neuron cultures

Article Open access 08 July 2020

A Simple Procedure for Creating Scalable Phenotypic Screening Assays in Human Neurons

Article Open access 21 June 2019

Combined small-molecule treatment accelerates maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons

Article Open access 02 January 2024

Introduction

There is growing concern over a possible link between neurodevelopmental disorders and exposure to chemicals in the environment^1,2,3 and even subtle neurotoxic effects on cognitive function may have substantial consequences to society when extrapolated to the population level⁴. Despite these potential risks, few chemicals have been extensively evaluated for neurotoxicity^1,2,3, largely due to limited predictive value⁵, prohibitive cost and ethical considerations associated with animal testing^1,2,3. In 2007, the National Research Council (NRC) published a vision for the future of toxicity screening and pathway analysis that is focused on strategies to reduce animal testing by implementing human cell-based models⁶. While cell-based assays are a priority for regulatory agencies, in vitro approaches must meet strict quality control guidelines and will require validation before replacing animal testing for toxicity screening and safety assessment^1,2,7. A major challenge towards validation of cell-based assays for assessing neurotoxicity is a limited understanding of mechanisms of action specific to human neurophysiology and benchmarks for justifying the replacement of animal testing are not clearly established for most in vitro approaches^1,2,3.

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) detection provides a well-defined model for testing cell-based neurotoxicity assays⁸, as sensitivity is dependent on functionally competent neurons and clear quantitative endpoints are available for comparing against the approved safety assessment model, the in vivo mouse bioassay^{8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17}. The BoNTs are the most potent known human toxins, exerting their toxicity by entering neuronal cells of the peripheral nervous system and blocking neurotransmitter release at the neuromuscular junction¹⁸, with a parenteral human lethal dose estimated to be as low as 1 ng/kg¹⁹. BoNTs are 150 kDa protein toxins consisting of a 100 kDa heavy chain and 50 kDa light chain linked by a disulfide bond. Cell entry proceeds via a series of consecutive and essential steps that result in cleavage of the disulfide bond to release the light chain into the cytosol, where it is refolded into the enzymatically active form^20,21,22,23. The active BoNT light chain cleaves the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment receptor (SNARE) protein family, which is an essential component of neurotransmitter release^24,25,26. Researchers have taken advantage of this mechanistic framework to develop in vitro cell-based assays that identify active BoNTs with sensitivities that are comparable to the mouse bioassay^{8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16}, including the first to be approved by the FDA for safety assessment of a pharmaceutical BoNT/A1 product¹⁷.

The aim of the present study was to establish a robust neurotoxicity screening assay suitable for standardization by using a scalable, non-cancerous human cell source and a chemically-defined culture substrate. Synthetic poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogels formed by “thiol-ene” photopolymerization²⁷ were chosen as a chemically defined culture substrate due to the versatility of this platform for modeling diverse cell functions^{28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41}. Human pluripotent stem cells provide a uniform and expandable source for tissue-specific cell types^42,43,44, including diverse neural and glial phenotypes^45,46,47,48. Therefore, human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neuronal cells were chosen as the cellular component for the neurotoxicity screening assay here. A particular emphasis of the present study was to explore the potential for iPSC-derived neural stem cells (iPSC-NSCs) as the cellular component for neurotoxicity screening, since these cells are expandable and can be differentiated down multiple neuronal and glial lineages and thus offer greater flexibility towards optimizing neural phenotypes for specific cell-based applications^49,50. Finally, active botulinum neurotoxin A1 (BoNT/A1) was chosen as a model toxin for validating human iPSC-derived neuronal cells cultured on PEG as a neurotoxicity assay, since this serotype has been adapted for a variety of pharmacological applications⁵¹ and can be detected with high sensitivity using functional neuronal cells^{8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17}.

Results and Discussion

BoNT/A1 was previously detected with sensitivity that exceeded the in vivo mouse bioassay using iPSC-derived neurons (iPSC-neurons) cultured on poly-L-ornithine and Matrigel (PLO/Matrigel) coated tissue culture polystyrene (TCP)¹¹. Therefore, BoNT/A1 detection was first compared for iPSC-neurons cultured on PEG hydrogels and PLO/Matrigel coated TCP surfaces to determine a baseline for sensitivity relative to the established assay¹¹. PEG hydrogels were formed by crosslinking 8-arm PEG-norbornene molecules with PEG-dithiol molecules²⁹, while pendant CRGDS peptide was incorporated to promote cell adhesion⁵² (see Methods). For in vitro cell-based assays, sensitivity is usually expressed as Units (U) of BoNT activity to reach half the maximum response (EC50) for SNAP-25 cleavage (Quantified by western blot as described in Methods; Fig. 1). The potency of BoNT/A1 preparations is established using the in vivo mouse bioassay, where 1 U is equivalent to the dose that leads to 50% lethality in mice within a four day period after intraperitoneal injection (mouse lethal dose 50, mLD50)^53,54. The sensitivities for BoNT/A1 detection by iPSC-neurons (Fig. 1) cultured on both PEG hydrogels (0.41 ± 0.04 U/well) and PLO/Matrigel coated TCP (0.38 ± 0.06 U/well) exceeded the in vivo mouse bioassay and were comparable to previous benchmarks established in the literature (~0.1–1 U)^10,11.

While iPSC-neurons have been established for detecting BoNTs with sensitivity that exceeds the mouse bioassay¹¹, these cells are terminally differentiated and post-mitotic, which introduces high costs and may be limiting for applications that require other neuronal phenotypes. Therefore, BoNT/A1 detection was optimized using human iPSC-derived neural stem cells (iPSC-NSCs) to provide an alternative cell source that is expandable and which can be differentiated down multiple neuronal lineages. The EC50 for BoNT/A1 detection was 10.7 ± 0.9 U/well when iPSC-NSCs were differentiated and matured on TCP using the manufacturer’s protocol (Fig. 2; “Manufacturer’s Protocol”; See Methods for details), which is substantially lower than the sensitivity achieved for iPSC-neurons (Fig. 1)¹¹. Therefore, we aimed to enhance BoNT/A1 sensitivity for iPSC-NSCs cultured on TCP by exploring the effects of surface coatings, differentiation factors and maturation times. Replacing the manufacturer’s proprietary pre-coat solution with poly-L-ornithine (PLO) and laminin (Fig. 2; “Differentiated on PLO/LAM”) treatment improved sensitivity for BoNT/A1 detection from 10.7 ± 0.9 U/well to 3.6 ± 0.5 U/well, with similar results on PLO/Matrigel coated surfaces (such as used for iPSC-neurons). Both PLO/LAM and PLO/Matrigel surface coatings have been applied to BoNT assays, but Matrigel is composed of a mixture of poorly-defined bioactive components, including many potent growth factors known to influence stem cell fate⁵⁵. Therefore, PLO/LAM treatment was used for subsequent experiments on TCP to provide a better defined surface. Differentiation in Neurobasal medium supplemented with B27, glutamax, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), or glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) did not improve BoNT/A1 sensitivity. However, sensitivity improved from 3.6 ± 0.5 U/well to 1.8 ± 0.7 U/well for iPSC-NSCs that were differentiated in the presence of retinoic acid (RA) and purmorphamine (PUR)⁵⁶. Finally, the highest sensitivity for BoNT/A1 detection (1.3 ± 0.2 U/well) was achieved for iPSC-NSCs that were matured for 23 days (Fig. 3a). Thus, BoNT/A1 detection was increased for iPSC-NSCs cultured on TCP surfaces coated with PLO/LAM, differentiated in medium supplemented with RA and PUR and matured for 23 days (Fig. 2; “Optimized Protocol”).

BoNT/A1 detection was then compared for iPSC-NSCs differentiated and matured on PEG hydrogels and PLO/LAM coated TCP surfaces. BoNT/A1 sensitivity for iPSC-NSCs differentiated and matured on PEG hydrogels minimally depended on matrix properties within the limited range of conditions explored (Supplementary Fig. S1), which included different crosslinking densities and RGD adhesion ligand concentrations⁵², as well as substitution of the non-degradable PEG-dithiol crosslinker with a protease-degradable peptide (Supplementary Fig. S1, Supplementary Table S1)⁵⁷. Therefore, subsequent comparisons to TCP were performed using PEG hydrogels with a non-degradable PEG-dithiol crosslinker, 50% crosslinking density and 3 mM CRGDS. BoNT/A1 sensitivity was improved when iPSC-NSCs were differentiated in medium supplemented with RA and PUR for both TCP and PEG hydrogels (Fig. 3a, “-RA/PUR” vs. “+RA/PUR”). A trend for increasing BoNT/A1 sensitivity with longer maturation time was repeatedly observed for iPSC-NSCs cultured on TCP, with the highest sensitivity of 1.3 ± 0.2 U/well achieved after 23 days (Fig. 3a, “TCP”, +RA/PUR condition). When iPSC-NSCs were differentiated and matured for 23 days on PEG hydrogels, sensitivity for BoNT/A1 detection (EC50 = 1.0 ± 0.1 U/well, Fig. 3a) and SNAP-25 cleavage patterns (Fig. 3b) were comparable to TCP. However, a similar EC50 of 1.1 ± 0.1 U/well was achieved for iPSC-NSCs cultured on PEG hydrogels after only nine days of maturation (Fig. 3a, “PEG”, +RA/PUR condition). Thus, iPSC-NSCs required approximately 1–2 weeks less maturation time to detect BoNT/A1 with sensitivity equivalent to the in vivo mouse bioassay when cultured on PEG hydrogels compared to PLO/LAM coated TCP.

We hypothesized that differences in differentiated cell populations generated by iPSC-NSCs on PEG hydrogels may play a role in the shorter maturation time required to reach maximum BoNT/A1 sensitivity compared to TCP. To test this hypothesis, immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 3c–h) and RT-PCR (Fig. 4) were performed to analyze neuronal and glial markers for iPSC-NSCs after differentiation and maturation on PEG hydrogels and PLO/LAM coated TCP surfaces. Immunofluorescence imaging identified mixed βIII-tubulin⁺ and GFAP⁺ populations on PEG hydrogels (Fig. 3f–h) and TCP surfaces (Fig. 3c–e) when iPSC-NSCs were differentiated and matured for 23 days (with RA/PUR), but morphological features differed substantially between the two culture platforms. Specifically, whereas iPSC-NSCs were characterized mostly by disorganized mesh-like layers after differentiation and maturation on TCP (Fig. 3c), cells cultured on PEG hydrogels formed organized clusters with dense bundles of interconnected neuronal processes (Fig. 3f). Further analysis by RT-PCR demonstrated that iPSC-NSCs were characterized by significantly higher gene expression for several neuronal markers when differentiated on PEG hydrogels (Fig. 4a–d), including RBFOX3, which encodes the NeuN epitope associated with maturity in many human neurons⁵⁸. Consistent with RT-PCR results, iPSC-NSCs differentiated into neuronal cells with distinct phenotypes (e.g., glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons, Fig. 5a–l) and expressed markers for synaptic proteins (e.g., synapsin and synaptophysin, Fig. 5m–r) when cultured on PEG hydrogels. In contrast, GFAP was more highly expressed for iPSC-NSCs cultured on TCP regardless of condition, with >20-fold higher expression than cells cultured on PEG hydrogels by day 23, including cells differentiated with or without RA/PUR (Fig. 4e–f). Thus, iPSC-NSCs that were differentiated and matured on PEG hydrogels were characterized by enhanced expression for several neuronal markers and relatively lower expression of GFAP compared to cells cultured on TCP surfaces.

Previous studies have reported that glial phenotypes are enriched for primary rat neural progenitor cells cultured on stiffer substrates^59,60, while enhanced neuronal differentiation has been observed for both rat⁶¹ and human pluripotent stem cells cultured on compliant surfaces³⁴. A role for mechanical properties in directing neural stem cell function is notable, since the modulus for TCP (~GPa)^62,63 is approximately six orders of magnitude higher than PEG hydrogels formed within the range of conditions reported here (~kPa)²⁹ and compared to neural tissue in vivo (~kPa)⁶². GFAP gene expression was substantially upregulated for iPSC-NSCs on TCP relative to cells on PEG hydrogels, which would be consistent with enrichment of glial phenotypes on stiffer substrates. However, while GFAP expression is specific to mature glial phenotypes in rodents, it is expressed by human radial glia during neurogenesis⁶⁴. Therefore, higher GFAP expression by iPSC-NSCs cultured on TCP may be due to maintenance of a progenitor state rather than enhanced differentiation into mature glial cell types (e.g., astrocytes or oligodendrocytes). Consequently, functional neurons may emerge earlier for iPSC-NSCs cultured on PEG hydrogels, a possibility that is supported by relatively higher gene expression for neuronal markers relative to cells cultured on TCP by nine days of maturation (Fig. 4). Despite differences in neural differentiation for iPSC-NSCs cultured on PEG hydrogels and TCP surfaces, there were no clear correlations to BoNT/A1 sensitivity for any of the markers investigated. Therefore, further investigation will be required to determine the molecular mechanisms that lead to higher BoNT/A1 sensitivity by day 9 of maturation when iPSC-NSCs are cultured on PEG hydrogels, including analysis of cell properties and potential effects of differences in cell culture (e.g., cell density or morphological characteristics). Nevertheless, our results highlight differences in differentiation for iPSC-NSCs cultured on PEG hydrogels and TCP surfaces that have broader implications for biomedical engineering and toxicology research.

Our combined results demonstrate that iPSC-NSCs offer a non-cancerous, expandable and robust human cell source for cell-based BoNT/A1 detection assays using standard and engineered cell culture platforms. Importantly, iPSC-NSCs cultured on synthetic PEG hydrogels generate neural populations with the functional properties required for BoNT uptake and eventual SNARE cleavage (Fig. 1), achieving sensitivities for detecting active BoNT/A1 that were comparable to benchmark EC50 values previously reported for cell-based assays^{8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16} and an approved animal testing protocol for safety assessment. Matrigel is commonly used to promote 3D cellular self-assembly into model tissues in vitro⁶⁵, but introduces uncertainty due to a composition that includes numerous bioactive components such as growth factors and extracellular matrix proteins⁵⁵. In contrast, PEG hydrogels promoted iPSC-NSC differentiation and 3D self-assembly into model neural tissues despite presenting minimal bioactive cues (only CRGDS adhesion peptide). Thus, the inherent capacity for in vitro self-assembly of human iPSC-NSCs into functional neuronal tissues can be harnessed using a minimally complex, synthetic culture platform. Further, our protocol was developed using monolayer culture techniques that are directly translatable to quantitative and/or enhanced throughput screening approaches⁵⁰, which is a particular advantage compared to culture models that require suspension culture or 3D seeding in Matrigel⁶⁵. Thus, human pluripotent stem cell-derived neuronal cell types cultured on chemically-defined hydrogels offer an alternative to standard platforms for cell-based neurotoxicity screening.

Methods

Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) Hydrogels

PEG hydrogels were formed using “thiol-ene” photopolymerization to crosslink 8-arm PEG-norbornene (PEG-NB) molecules (20000 MW, JenKem USA, 8ARM (TP)-NB-20K) with PEG-dithiol molecules (3400 MW, Laysan Biosciences, SH-PEG-SH-3400)²⁸ or a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-degradable peptide (KCGGPQGIAGQGCK; Genscript, >90% purity, C-terminus amidated)⁵⁷. To promote cell adhesion, 3–4 mM CRGDS⁵² (Genscript, >90% purity, C-terminus amidated) was incorporated through the thiol of a terminal cysteine group. Frozen stock solutions of 8-arm PEG-NB were prepared at a final concentration of 300 mg/mL by dissolving 300 mg 8-arm PEG-NB solid in 0.8 mL PBS (the lower PBS volume accounts for volume of dissolved solid), which was then sterile filtered using a 0.2 μm nylon syringe filter (Fisher). Stock ~95 mM SH-PEG-SH crosslinker (~190 mM thiol groups), MMP-peptide (~75 mM peptide/150 mM SH) and CRGDS peptide (~100 mM) solutions were prepared and sterile filtered through a 0.22 μm syringe filter (low protein binding PVDF, Millex) before verifying the final concentration by Elman’s assay (Thermo Scientific; PBS used to dissolve all reagents).

Unless otherwise noted, comparisons to tissue culture polystyrene used a non-degradable PEG-dithiol formulation with 40 mg/mL 8-arm PEG-norbornene (16 mM norbornene arms), 50% SH-PEG-SH crosslinking density (8 mM SH, 50% mol fraction relative to norbornene arms), 3 mM CRGDS and 0.05% (wt/wt) Irgacure 2959 (I2959 photoinitiator). PEG hydrogels were formed by pipetting 8 μL monomer into 96-well roundbottom plates (TPP® tissue culture plates, Sigma-Aldrich) or 10 μL into 96-well angiogenesis plates (μ-Plate Angiogenesis ibiTreat, Ibidi) and exposing to UV light (~365 nm, Top Shelf UVP XX-15L lamp/stand, Fisher) for two minutes. PEG hydrogels were formed in 96-well roundbottom plates for immunofluorescence imaging or neurotoxicity screening and angiogenesis plates for immunofluorescence imaging to limit meniscus formation and to prevent hydrogel buckling due to confinement during swelling (overnight incubation in basal medium, 37 °C, 5% CO₂).

Cell culture

All cells were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO₂. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons (iCell Neurons, Cellular Dynamics Inc) were cultured according to manufacturer’s protocols, as previously described in detail¹¹. Briefly, iPSC-neurons were seeded at a density of 35,000–40,0000 cells/cm² on hydrogels or poly-L-ornithine (PLO; Sigma-Aldrich) and Matrigel (BD Biosciences) coated tissue culture plates (96-well, TPP, MidSci) and cultured for one week using media provided by the manufacturer before neurotoxicity screening.

Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural stem cells (HIP^TM Neural Stem Cells, BC1 line, referred to as ‘iPSC-NSCs’) and all associated media components for the manufacturer’s protocol were provided by MTI-GlobalStem, Inc. Expansion Medium: Neurobasal® medium (Life Technologies) with 2% B-27® supplement (Life Technologies), 2 mM (1X) Glutagro (L‐ Alanine/L‐Glutamine dipeptide, Corning), 1X MEM non-essential amino acids (Corning) and 20 ng/mL FGF2 (GlobalStem). Differentiation Medium: Glasgow’s MEM (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% KnockOut serum replacement (Life Technologies), 100 μM beta-mercaptoethanol (Life Technologies) and 200 μM sodium pyruvate (Life Technologies) and conditioned using a proprietary protocol (GlobalStem). Maintenance Medium: NeuralQ™ Basal Medium (GlobalStem) with 2% GS21 Supplement (GlobalStem) and 0.5 mM Glutagro. To optimize BoNT/A1 sensitivity, the protocol described here was modified from the manufacturer’s recommendation for differentiating iPSC-NSCs into neurons. For optimization, iPSC-NSCs were expanded and differentiated according to manufacturer’s instructions or modified as follows: (1) Cells were plated on either laminin or Matrigel coated plates (8.3 μg/cm²) and matured for 1–4 weeks. (2) Plates were first treated with 0.01% poly-L-ornithine (PLO) before laminin or Matrigel coating instead of the manufacturer’s proprietary coating solution. (3) Cells were differentiated in the presence of 1–10 μM retinoic acid (RA) and 5 μM purmorphamine (PUR). (4) Cells were plated onto PLO/laminin coated TCP after expansion and then differentiated and matured on the same plate rather than first differentiating in a flask and then transferring to a new plate. (5) Cells were seeded at densities ranging from 5,000 cells per well to 20,000 cells per well. (6) The proprietary differentiation and/or maintenance medium were replaced with Neurobasal medium supplemented with B27, glutamax and with or without additional factors including cAMP, BDNF, GDNF. We note that the manufacturer has since modified the protocol for neural differentiation of iPSC-NSCs that was used as the control condition in the present study.

Optimized protocol for differentiation and maturation of iPSC-NSCs

Cryopreserved iPSC-NSCs were plated on a TCP flask coated with 8.3 μg/cm² growth factor reduced Matrigel (BD Biosciences; 1 hr. at 37 °C in expansion medium) and cultured in expansion medium until confluent. Cells were detached using Accutase and seeded in expansion medium at a density of 10,000 cells per well of a 96-well plate (Techno Plastic Products [TPP], MidSci) that was pre-coated overnight with 0.01% poly-L-ornithine (PLO, Sigma-Aldrich), followed by coating with 15 μg/ml of mouse laminin (Life Technologies) for 1 h at 37 °C. Cells were then cultured for one day in expansion medium and an additional five days in differentiation medium containing 2 μM retinoic acid (“RA”, Stemgent, Inc.) and 5 μM purmorphamine (“PUR”, Calbiochem). A fresh RA aliquot was used for each differentiation (stock concentration = 10 mg/mL in DMSO; store at −20 °C in the dark). Cells were matured in maintenance medium (without detachment) and matured for up to 23 days prior to use in a toxin assay.

For experiments on PEG hydrogels, iPSC-NSCs were first expanded to confluence on standard plates in expansion medium (as described above). The iPSC-NSCs were detached using Accutase, seeded on PEG hydrogels at a density of 50,000 cells/well and cultured in expansion medium until confluent (2–3 days). Upon confluence, iPSC-NSCs were cultured on PEG hydrogels for five days in differentiation medium with or without 2 μM retinoic acid and 5 μM purmorphamine (as indicated), with half of the medium exchanged every two days. Cells were then matured in maintenance medium for up to 23 days prior to use in a toxin assay (as indicated), with about half of the medium exchanged every 3–5 days. iPSC-NSCs cultured on PEG hydrogels and differentiated in the presence of RA and PUR could be maintained for over three months without an apparent change in cell morphology.

Botulinum neurotoxin assay

Pure Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) was prepared from Clostridium botulinum strain Hall A hyper as previously described⁶⁶. The toxin was dissolved in phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4 and 40% glycerol and stored at −20 °C until use. Activity of the BoNT/A1 preparation was determined by the mouse bioassay^53,54 and specific toxicity was about 1.25 × 10⁸ mouse LD₅₀ Units/mg (U/mg). After the indicated maturation times, cells were exposed to serial dilutions of BoNT/A1 in maintenance medium for 48 h at 37 °C, 5% CO₂. The toxin was then aspirated and cells lysed in 50 μl of 1× LDS lysis buffer (Invitrogen). The samples were analyzed by Western blot essentially as described previously^16,67, using a monoclonal anti-SNAP-25 antibody (Synaptic Systems, Germany) and secondary anti-mouse AP conjugated antibody (KPL). Bands were visualized with PhosphaGlo chemiluminescent reagent (KPL) and densitometry was done using a Foto/Analyst FX system and TotalLab Quant software (Fotodyne). Data plots and best-fit lines (four parameters – variable slope) were generated and EC50 values estimated using PRISM 6 software.

Gene Expression by Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR

Total RNA was isolated using RNEasy Plus (Qiagen). 100 ng of total RNA was reverse-transcribed using the qScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Quanta Biosciences). Real-time PCR was performed using PerfeCTa SYBR Green Supermix (Quanta Biosciences) and 300 micromolar primers in an Mx3005P Real-Time instrument (Agilent) for 40 cycles of 95 °C/15 seconds, 58 °C/20 seconds, 72 °C/30 seconds, followed by melt curve analysis. The relative amounts of PCR product were quantified using the relative threshold cycle (ΔΔCt) method. The gene quantities for each sample were normalized against GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase). See Table 1 for the full list of primers used in the present study.

Table 1 List of RT-PCR primers.

Full size table

Immunofluorescence Imaging

Blocking buffer: 0.25% Triton X-100 and 1% BSA in PBS. Incubation buffer: 0.05% Triton X-100 and 1% BSA in PBS. Rinse buffer: 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS. See Table 2 for the full list of antibodies and dilutions used in the present study. Immunostaining for PEG hydrogels was performed using 96-well round bottom (TPP culture plates, Sigma-Aldrich) or angiogenesis plates (μ-Plate Angiogenesis 96 well, ibiTreat, Ibidi). Cells were fixed for 60 min. with 2% buffered formalin and then rinsed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) before further processing (or stored in PBS at 4 °C until immunostaining). Cells were permeabilized and blocked in blocking buffer (at least 60 min.). Primary antibodies were prepared in incubation buffer (See Table for dilutions), added to the samples and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Cells were rinsed in rinse buffer (2 × 60 min.) followed by a third rinse step in incubation buffer (at least 60 min.). Secondary antibodies (1:200) and DAPI (1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich) were prepared in incubation buffer, added to the samples and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Samples were then rinsed 2 × 60 min. in rinse buffer, followed by an additional overnight rinse at 4°C in rinse buffer. Samples were then stored in PBS until imaging (typically at least 24 hours). Confocal images were collected using a Nikon A1R laser scanning confocal microscope with a Plan Apo 10× objective. Images were cropped to 500 × 500 or 750 × 750 μm using ImageJ^68,69.

Table 2 List of antibodies used for immunofluorescence imaging.

Full size table

Statistical Analysis

Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test for RT-PCR data (Fig. 4). Prism was used to perform a one-way ANOVA (alpha = 0.05) followed by a Tukey test to compare individual means for EC50 data (Figs 2, 3, Supplementary Fig. S1). The EC50 values from Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. S1 were combined for statistical analysis (see Supplementary Table S1 for all sample comparisons).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Pellett, S. et al. Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Neuronal Cells Cultured on Chemically-Defined Hydrogels for Sensitive In Vitro Detection of Botulinum Neurotoxin. Sci. Rep. 5, 14566; doi: 10.1038/srep14566 (2015).

References

Bal-Price, A. et al. International STakeholder NETwork (ISTNET): creating a developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing road map for regulatory purposes. Arch. Toxicol. 89, 269–287 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Crofton, K. M. et al. Developmental neurotoxicity testing: Recommendations for developing alternative methods for the screening and prioritization of chemicals. ALTEX-Altern. Anim. Exp. 28, 9–15 (2011).
Google Scholar
Grandjean, P. & Landrigan, P. J. Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity. Lancet Neurol. 13, 330–338 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bellinger, D. C. A Strategy for Comparing the Contributions of Environmental Chemicals and Other Risk Factors to Neurodevelopment of Children. Environ. Health Perspect. 120, 501–507 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Olson, H. et al. Concordance of the toxicity of pharmaceuticals in humans and in animals. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 32, 56–67 (2000).
Article CAS Google Scholar
National Research Council Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy. (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007).
Judson, R. et al. In vitro and modelling approaches to risk assessment from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ToxCast programme. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 115, 69–76 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pellett, S. in Botulinum Neurotoxins. Vol. 364. (eds. A. Rummel & T. Binz ) 257–285 (Springer-Verlag Berlin, Berlin, 2013).
Article Google Scholar
Whitemarsh, R. C. M., Tepp, W. H., Johnson, E. A. & Pellett, S. Persistence of Botulinum Neurotoxin A Subtypes 1–5 in Primary Rat Spinal Cord Cells. PLoS One 9, e90252 (2014).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Whitemarsh, R. C. M. et al. Characterization of Botulinum Neurotoxin A Subtypes 1 Through 5 by Investigation of Activities in Mice, in Neuronal Cell Cultures and In Vitro. Infect. Immun. 81, 3894–3902 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Whitemarsh, R. C. M. et al. Novel Application of Human Neurons Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for Highly Sensitive Botulinum Neurotoxin Detection. Toxicol. Sci. 126, 426–435 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
McNutt, P., Celver, J., Hamilton, T. & Mesngon, M. Embryonic stem cell-derived neurons are a novel, highly sensitive tissue culture platform for botulinum research. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 405, 85–90 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kiris, E. et al. Embryonic stem cell-derived motoneurons provide a highly sensitive cell culture model for botulinum neurotoxin studies, with implications for high-throughput drug discovery. Stem Cell Research 6, 195–205 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nuss, J. E. et al. Development of Cell-Based Assays to Measure Botulinum Neurotoxin Serotype A Activity Using Cleavage-Sensitive Antibodies. J. Biomol. Screen 15, 42–51 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lee, J.-O., Rosenfield, J., Tzipori, S. & Park, J.-B. M17 human neuroblastoma cell as a cell model for investigation of Botulinum Neurotoxin A activity and evaluation of BoNT/A specific antibody. The Botulinum Journal 1, 135–152 (2008).
Article Google Scholar
Pellett, S., Tepp, W. H., Clancy, C. M., Borodic, G. E. & Johnson, E. A. A neuronal cell-based botulinum neurotoxin assay for highly sensitive and specific detection of neutralizing serum antibodies. FEBS Lett. 581, 4803–4808 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Fernandez-Salas, E. et al. Botulinum Neurotoxin Serotype a Specific Cell-Based Potency Assay to Replace the Mouse Bioassay. PLoS One 7 (2012).
Pantano, S. & Montecucco, C. The blockade of the neurotransmitter release apparatus by botulinum neurotoxins. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 793–811 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gill, D. M. Bacterial toxins - A table of lethal amounts. Microbiological Reviews 46, 86–94 (1982).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pirazzini, M. et al. Thioredoxin and Its Reductase Are Present on Synaptic Vesicles and Their Inhibition Prevents the Paralysis Induced by Botulinum Neurotoxins. Cell Reports 8, 1870–1878 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Montal, M. In Annual Review of Biochemistry, Vol 79, (eds. R.D. Kornberg, C. R. H. Raetz, J. E. Rothman & J. W. Thorner ) 591–617 (Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, 2010).
Article Google Scholar
Fischer, A. et al. Bimodal modulation of the botulinum neurotoxin protein-conducting channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1330–1335 (2009).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Fischer, A. & Montal, M. Crucial role of the disulfide bridge between botulinum neurotoxin light and heavy chains in protease translocation across membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 29604–29611 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Schiavo, G., Matteoli, M. & Montecucco, C. Neurotoxins affecting neuroexocytosis. Physiol. Rev. 80, 717–766 (2000).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Schiavo, G., Rossetto, O., Tonello, F. & Montecucco, C. Intracellular targets and metalloprotease activity of tetanus and botulism neurotoxins. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 195, 257–274 (1995).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Montecucco, C. & Schiavo, G. Mechanism of action of tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins. Mol. Microbiol. 13, 1–8 (1994).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hoyle, C. E. & Bowman, C. N. Thiol-Ene Click Chemistry. Angew. Chem. -Int. Edit. 49, 1540–1573 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Fairbanks, B. D. et al. A versatile synthetic extracellular matrix mimic via thiol-norbornene photopolymerization. Adv. Mater. 21, 5005–5010 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hansen, T. D. et al. Biomaterial arrays with defined adhesion ligand densities and matrix stiffness identify distinct phenotypes for tumorigenic and non-tumorigenic human mesenchymal cell types. Biomaterials Science 2, 745–756 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lin, C.-C., Ki, C. S. & Shih, H. Thiol–norbornene photoclick hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. In Press (2015).
Van Hove, A. H., Beltejar, M.-J. G. & Benoit, D. S. W. Development and in vitro assessment of enzymatically-responsive poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for the delivery of therapeutic peptides. Biomaterials 35, 9719–9730 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wang, C., Tong, X. M. & Yang, F. Bioengineered 3D Brain Tumor Model To Elucidate the Effects of Matrix Stiffness on Glioblastoma Cell Behavior Using PEG-Based Hydrogels. Mol. Pharm. 11, 2115–2125 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nguyen, E. H., Zanotelli, M. R., Schwartz, M. P. & Murphy, W. L. Differential effects of cell adhesion, modulus and VEGFR-2 inhibition on capillary network formation in synthetic hydrogel arrays. Biomaterials 35, 2149–2161 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Musah, S. et al. Substratum-induced differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells reveals the coactivator YAP is a potent regulator of neuronal specification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 13805–13810 (2014).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Hynes, W. F. et al. Micropatterning of 3D Microenvironments for Living Biosensor Applications. Biosensors 4, 28–44 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
McKinnon, D. D., Kloxin, A. M. & Anseth, K. S. Synthetic hydrogel platform for three-dimensional culture of embryonic stem cell-derived motor neurons. Biomaterials Science 1, 460–469 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Schwartz, M. P. et al. A Quantitative Comparison of Human HT-1080 Fibrosarcoma Cells and Primary Human Dermal Fibroblasts Identifies a 3D Migration Mechanism with Properties Unique to the Transformed Phenotype. PLoS One 8, e81689 (2013).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Gramlich, W. M., Kim, I. L. & Burdick, J. A. Synthesis and orthogonal photopatterning of hyaluronic acid hydrogels with thiol-norbornene chemistry. Biomaterials 34, 9803–9811 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lin, C.-C., Raza, A. & Shih, H. PEG hydrogels formed by thiol-ene photo-click chemistry and their effect on the formation and recovery of insulin-secreting cell spheroids. Biomaterials 32, 9685–9695 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Anderson, S. B., Lin, C. C., Kuntzler, D. V. & Anseth, K. S. The performance of human mesenchymal stem cells encapsulated in cell-degradable polymer-peptide hydrogels. Biomaterials 32, 3564–3574 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Benton, J. A., Fairbanks, B. D. & Anseth, K. S. Characterization of valvular interstitial cell function in three dimensional matrix metalloproteinase degradable PEG hydrogels. Biomaterials 30, 6593–6603 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yu, J. Y. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318, 1917–1920 (2007).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Thomson, J. A. et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282, 1145–1147 (1998).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Zhang, S. C., Wernig, M., Duncan, I. D., Brustle, O. & Thomson, J. A. In vitro differentiation of transplantable neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 1129–1133 (2001).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Liu, H. S. & Zhang, S. C. Specification of neuronal and glial subtypes from human pluripotent stem cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 68, 3995–4008 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gaspard, N. & Vanderhaeghen, P. Mechanisms of neural specification from embryonic stem cells. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 20, 37–43 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Eiraku, M. & Sasai, Y. Self-formation of layered neural structures in three-dimensional culture of ES cells. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22, 768–777 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Xu, X. H. & Zhong, Z. Disease modeling and drug screening for neurological diseases using human induced pluripotent stem cells. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 34, 755–764 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hou, Z. et al. A human pluripotent stem cell platform for assessing developmental neural toxicity screening. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 4 (Suppl 1), S12 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Schantz, E. J. & Johnson, E. A. Properties and use of botulinum toxin and other microbial neurotoxins in medicine. Microbiological Reviews 56, 80–99 (1992).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pierschbacher, M. D. & Ruoslahti, E. Cell attachment activity of fibronectin can be duplicated by small synthetic fragments of the molecule. Nature 309, 30–33 (1984).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Hatheway, C. in Laboratory Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases. (eds. A. Balows, W. J. Hausler, Jr., M. Ohashi, A. Turano & E. H. Lennete ) 111–133 (Springer New York, 1988).
Schantz, E. J. & Kautter, D. A. Standardized Assay for Clostridium-Botulinum Toxins. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 61, 96–99 (1978).
CAS Google Scholar
Hughes, C. S., Radan, L., Betts, D., Postovit, L. M. & Lajoie, G. A. Proteomic analysis of extracellular matrices used in stem cell culture. Proteomics 11, 3983–3991 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Li, X. J. et al. Directed differentiation of ventral spinal progenitors and motor neurons from human embryonic stem cells by small molecules. Stem Cells 26, 886–893 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nagase, H. & Fields, G. B. Human matrix metalloproteinase specificity studies using collagen sequence-based synthetic peptides. Biopolymers 40, 399–416 (1996).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sarnat, H. B., Nochlin, D. & Born, D. E. Neuronal nuclear antigen (NeuN): a marker of neuronal maturation in the early human fetal nervous system1. Brain and Development 20, 88–94 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lampe, K. J., Mooney, R. G., Bjugstad, K. B. & Mahoney, M. J. Effect of macromer weight percent on neural cell growth in 2D and 3D nondegradable PEG hydrogel culture. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 94A, 1162–1171 (2010).
CAS Google Scholar
Saha, K. et al. Substrate Modulus Directs Neural Stem Cell Behavior. Biophys. J. 95, 4426–4438 (2008).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Leipzig, N. D. & Shoichet, M. S. The effect of substrate stiffness on adult neural stem cell behavior. Biomaterials 30, 6867–6878 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cox, T. R. & Erler, J. T. Remodeling and homeostasis of the extracellular matrix: implications for fibrotic diseases and cancer. Dis. Model. Mech. 4, 165–178 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Miyake, K., Satomi, N. & Sasaki, S. Elastic modulus of polystyrene film from near surface to bulk measured by nanoindentation using atomic force microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 031925 (2006).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Rakic, P. Developmental and evolutionary adaptations of cortical radial glia. Cereb. Cortex 13, 541–549 (2003).
Article Google Scholar
Ader, M. & Tanaka, E. M. Modeling human development in 3D culture. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 31, 23–28 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Malizio, C., Goodnough, M. & Johnson, E. in Bacterial Toxins: Methods and Protocols. Vol. 145. (ed. O. Holst ) 27–39 (Humana Press, 2000).
Article Google Scholar
Pellett, S., Tepp, W. H., Toth, S. I. & Johnson, E. A. Comparison of the primary rat spinal cord cell (RSC) assay and the mouse bioassay for botulinum neurotoxin type A potency determination. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 61, 304–310 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to Image J: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Meth 9, 671–675 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Rasband, W. S. (Image J, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ 1997-2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by funding provided by the National Institutes of Health (R01AI095274, R01AI093504, R21EB016381-01, 1UH2TR000506-01 and 3UH2TR000506-02S1). MPS acknowledges a donation in the memory of Gerald E. Whitbeck (generously provided by his family and Follett Corp).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
Sabine Pellett, William H. Tepp, Jacob M. Scherf, Christina L. Pier & Eric A. Johnson
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
Michael P. Schwartz & William L. Murphy
MTI-GlobalStem, Inc. Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America
Richard Josephson
Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
James A. Thomson
Morgridge Institute for Research, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
James A. Thomson
Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America
James A. Thomson
Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
William L. Murphy

Authors

Sabine Pellett
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Michael P. Schwartz
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
William H. Tepp
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Richard Josephson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jacob M. Scherf
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Christina L. Pier
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
James A. Thomson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
William L. Murphy
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Eric A. Johnson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.P. and M.P.S. posed the original research question and formulated design of experiments. S.P., M.P.S., W.H.T., R.J., J.M.S. and C.L.P. performed experiments and collected data. S.P., M.P.S. and R.J. analyzed the data. S.P. and M.P.S. wrote the manuscript. S.P., M.P.S., J.A.T., W.L.M. and E.A.J. supervised the study. All authors discussed the results, reviewed and commented on the manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.A.T. is a founder and stockholder for Cellular Dynamics, Inc. R.J. is currently employed by MTI-GlobalStem, Inc.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Figure S1

Supplementary Table S1

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pellett, S., Schwartz, M., Tepp, W. et al. Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Neuronal Cells Cultured on Chemically-Defined Hydrogels for Sensitive In Vitro Detection of Botulinum Neurotoxin. Sci Rep 5, 14566 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14566

Download citation

Received: 30 June 2015
Accepted: 01 September 2015
Published: 28 September 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14566

This article is cited by

Why the impact of mechanical stimuli on stem cells remains a challenge
- Roman Goetzke
- Antonio Sechi
- Wolfgang Wagner
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2018)
3D culture models of Alzheimer’s disease: a road map to a “cure-in-a-dish”
- Se Hoon Choi
- Young Hye Kim
- Doo Yeon Kim
Molecular Neurodegeneration (2016)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.