Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Reporter pathway analysis from transcriptome data: Metabolite-centric versus Reaction-centric approach


A systems-based investigation of the effect of perturbations on metabolic machinery is crucial to elucidate the mechanism behind perturbations. One way to investigate the perturbation-induced changes within the cell metabolism is to focus on pathway-level effects. In this study, three different perturbation types (genetic, environmental and disease-based) are analyzed to compute a list of reporter pathways, metabolic pathways which are significantly affected from a perturbation. The most common omics data type, transcriptome, is used as an input to the bioinformatic analysis. The pathways are scored by two alternative approaches: by averaging the changes in the expression levels of the genes controlling the associated reactions (reaction-centric) and by averaging the changes in the associated metabolites which were scored based on the associated genes (metabolite-centric). The analysis reveals the superiority of the novel metabolite-centric approach over the commonly used reaction-centric approach since it is based on metabolites which better represent the cross-talk among different pathways, enabling a more global and realistic cataloguing of network-wide perturbation effects.


Pathways are functional units which perform certain cellular tasks. A practical way to grasp the effect of a perturbation on molecular mechanisms, whether it is environmental, genetic or disease-based, is to check how it affects hundreds of cellular pathways. The availability of omics data facilitates the documentation of the perturbation-induced changes in the cell via the pathways constituting its cellular networks. Metabolic pathways are one of the most appealing pathway types in this sense since metabolism is the engine that runs the cellular factory. Several computational methods emerged, for example, to integrate transcriptome data and metabolic networks to catalogue how the pathways respond to a perturbation1,2,3,4.

The most common pathway-oriented approach to bridge mRNA-level changes and observed phenotypes is pathway enrichment, which statistically analyze the enrichment of associated pathways for a set of genes found to be significantly affected from the perturbation, without considering the magnitudes of individual changes observed for the gene transcripts5. However, it is also crucial to consider the information on the connectivity and the magnitude of the significance of change for such differentially expressed genes. More importantly, genes not differentially expressed should also be accounted since they can exhibit significant coordinated changes when considered together6. Therefore, metabolic networks can be used as a scaffold to map the differential expression information of all genes such that pathway-level perturbation effects are presented by utilizing network connectivity7,8. Organism-specific metabolic network information for such an analysis can be obtained from popular pathway databases such as KEGG9, BioCyc10 and Reactome11, or it is available via curated genome-scale metabolic models12.

Here I present a new approach to catalogue metabolic pathway-level perturbation effects based on transcriptome data. Approaches in the literature for the determination of perturbed metabolic pathways are reaction-centric, i.e. pathways are scored based on the expression levels of the genes controlling the associated reactions. A metabolite-centric approach which takes into account all the reactions which consume or produce the metabolites of the pathway is needed to better represent the effects of a perturbation on network-level. A novel metabolite-centric scoring algorithm is employed to integrate organism-specific metabolic networks with the statistical changes on the genes which control the reactions functioning in the network and it is compared to the more straightforward reaction-centric algorithm. The algorithm builds on the reporter metabolite approach commonly used in the analysis of transcriptome-associated regulations in metabolic networks7. The metabolite-centric reporter pathway analysis (RPAm) is shown to outperform the reaction-centric scoring of pathways (RPAr) in terms of reporting perturbation-associated underlying mechanisms.

Results and Discussion

Reporter pathways for a Genetic Perturbation

GDH1 is known to encode NADPH-dependent conversion of 2-ketoglutarate to glutamate in the yeast S. cerevisiae. A deletion was introduced to this gene to perturb the cofactor balance within the yeast cells13. The resulting strain had defects in ammonia assimilation and had decreased glycerol production and increased ethanol production. The corresponding transcriptome data was later analyzed based on differential statistical analysis, however the analysis of a small subset of data that cover only genes controlling cofactor-associated enzymes, not the genome-wide analysis, revealed results which can be biologically linked to the source of perturbation14. Later, reporter metabolite analysis of the same data enabled a noticeably better deduction of the mechanism of the genetic perturbation7. They have identified few metabolites involved in the pentose phosphate pathway as reporters, which is reasonable since this pathway is a source of NADPH. This showed the power of the approaches which take into account network connectivity and do not make a priori selection on the genes based on their significance.

Here, I analyze the same dataset by the reporter pathway approach. Reporter pathways were calculated based on the two alternative approaches, RPAr and RPAm and also by PADOG. In addition to the NADPH imbalance, the deletion also results in an NADH imbalance in the cell since the deleted reaction is replaced by an NADH-dependent route by the cell. Therefore, pathways linked to NADPH and NADH are expected to be perturbed. The RPAm results revealed 35 significant pathways affected from the perturbation (Table 1). Among those are mainly pentose phosphate pathway, pathways of branched-chain amino acids (leucine, isoleucine and valine), glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, TCA cycle and NADPH/NADH interconversion pathways, all directly related to the source of perturbation. The deletion of GDH1 gene forces the NADH-dependent route to be active, leading to the changes in all these NADH or NADPH dependent pathways. A study on the metabolome analysis of a similar strain with GDH1 deletion and GDH2 overexpression reports statistically significant changes on the branched chain amino acids valine, leucine and isoleucine, as well as on lysine15. Several related pathways were predicted to be significantly dysregulated in the RPAm analysis. RPAm could identify a significant change in the direct source of perturbation, 2-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex, successfully. RPAr, on the other hand, could not capture the significant change in this pathway. Moreover, glycolytic pathway, lysine biosynthesis and other pathways which are linked to the perturbation were not identified in the RPAr analysis. In a study reporting a mutant S. cerevisiae strain with enhanced NADPH demand, the change in glycerol production was explained by a change in folate cycle16. RPAm reports significant changes in folate cycle related pathways in parallel to this hypothesis, which could not be attained by RPAr. Pentose phosphate pathway, for example, was ranked as top fourth pathway in RPAm analysis whereas it was the 13th most significant pathway in RPAr analysis. Besides, non-oxidative pentose phosphate pathway was only identified by RPAm.

Table 1 Significantly perturbed pathways for GDH1 deletion in S. cerevisiae.

PADOG results were fairly stringent, leading to only few significant pathways: TCA cycle and leucine biosynthesis. The pathways pentose phosphate pathway and 2-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex were identified among the top five affected pathways, albeit with a p-value of 0.04. As mentioned in the methods section, for all calculations, the most significant gene was first mapped to the corresponding reaction if the reaction is associated with multiple genes. PADOG calculations were also repeated by using all genes associated with a pathway without making this initial mapping. Interestingly, assigned significance levels for TCA cycle and pentose phosphate pathways were 0.11 and 0.32 this time, respectively.

The results show the power of metabolite-centered reporter pathway analysis since the approach led to the identification of a number of significantly affected pathways all relevant to the genetic perturbation, which was hardly identified in the initial analysis of the dataset14 and revealed to some extent in the original paper introducing the reporter metabolite analysis7. Reporter metabolite analysis identifies metabolites around which most significant transcriptional changes occur. RPAm, on the other hand, relying upon the strength of reporter metabolite analysis, takes it into a new level since it is easier to interpret the scores of pathway activity information than metabolite scores.

Reporter Pathways for an Environmental Perturbation

A commonly studied environmental perturbation in yeast S. cerevisiae is based on the availability of oxygen. Aerobic and anaerobic cultures have been analyzed in transcriptome level to enlighten underlying mechanisms17. RPAm and RPAr analyses both led to the identification of aerobic respiration (electron transport chain), one of the major related pathways directly related to the source of perturbation (Table 2). A major distinctive characteristics of this environmental perturbation is the activation of electron transport chain in aerobic conditions. Another commonly identified pathway, glycolysis, is in line with the findings that glycolytic fluxes were several folds higher18 and the concentrations of major glycolytic metabolites changed in anaerobic condition19. There is also an increase reported in the mRNA levels of gluconeogenesis specific genes, FBP1 and PCK1 in aerobiosis19, in accordance with the detection of this pathway as reporter by both RPAm and RPAr.

Table 2 Significantly perturbed pathways for aerobic-anaerobic change in S. cerevisiae.

The increase in glycolytic flux necessitates a decrease in the pentose phosphate pathway flux since they are competing branches in the metabolic network. This was reported at flux level20, at proteome level21 and also at mRNA level19,22. The metabolites of the pathway also exhibited changes between aerobic and anaerobic conditions19. As obvious, the activity of TCA cycle is minimal in anaerobic chemostat cultures since the flux is directed towards mostly ethanol whereas a fully active TCA cycle is observed in aerobic chemostat cultures since there is no byproduct formation. The pathway also showed alterations in the metabolome level19. The dysregulation of TCA cycle and pentose phosphate pathway in response to oxygen availability was only captured by RPAm (Table 2).

Several fatty-acid degradation pathways appear in Table 2, including heptadecenoyl-CoA and octadecadienoyl-CoA degradation and oleate oxidation. Fatty acid oxidation is known to be downregulated at anaerobiosis22. On the other hand, in anaerobic conditions, the yeast needs to be supplemented by oleate and sterols since the synthesis of these biomolecules are oxygen-dependent23,24. Therefore an alteration is expected in the related pathways from aerobiosis to anaerobiosis, explaining the identification of oleate oxidation and zymmosterol biosynthesis as reporter pathways (Table 2). In addition to sterol and fatty acid biosynthesis, heme biosynthesis pathway is also oxygen dependent25,26. The presence of heme activates the transcription factor Hap1p (heme activated protein) which is responsible for the expression of a set of genes involved in respiration25,27. This mechanism was pointed out by both RPAm and RPAr since heme biosynthesis was in the list. Another identified pathway, known also as kynurenine pathway, is the degradation of tryptophan by the use of oxygen to synthesize the nicotinic acid moiety NAD+. Since the synthesis is oxygen-dependent, the yeast cells are nicotinate auxotroph in anaerobic conditions. Therefore, nicotinate must be supplied to the anaerobic growth media28. This behavior is captured by RPAm by reporting a change associated with the upper part of kynurenine pathway till 2-amino-3-carboxymuconate semialdehyde. PADOG identified three pathways for the cut-off level of 0.01, all belonging to fatty acid degradation. Heme biosynthesis was captured at a lower significance level (0.03). Other related pathways such as glycolysis, respiration and TCA cycle were predicted to be not affected by PADOG from the oxygen availability.

Reporter Pathways for a Disease Perturbation

Finally the two alternative approaches were applied to Alzheimer’s disease dataset29. The metabolite-centric reporter pathway analysis of this dataset was already reported before30 based on iMS570 brain metabolic model and the related manual pathway assignments and it revealed a number of disease-related pathways which were verified from the literature data. Here, I analyze the dataset for BioCyc-based human metabolic network and with also the reaction-centric reporter pathway analysis to allow a comparison (Table 3).

Table 3 Significantly perturbed pathways for Alzheimer’s disease.

Results for RPAm include a number of lipid related pathways: triacylglycerol, CDB-diacylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, 3-phosphoinositide, sphingosine and myo-inositol metabolisms. Significantly less phosphoinositides and significantly elevated myo-inositol levels were reported in Alzheimer’s disease31,32. TCA cycle is a reporter pathway based on RPAm, but RPAr fails to capture the perturbation of this pathway in Alzheimer’s disease. It was reported that a number of mitochondrial enzymes that function in TCA cycle exhibits changes during the disease33,34,35. Similarly, the perturbation in melatonin degradation pathway is only successfully identified by RPAm. It is known that melatonin levels are reduced in Alzheimer’s disease patients and melatonin can be used as a biomarker for the early stages of the disease36,37. Mevalonate pathway is the precursor of cholesterol biosynthesis and cholesterol metabolism is known to be affected in Alzheimer’s disease38. The pathway is only identified by RPAm analysis. Another pathway identified by RPAm, heparan sulphate biosynthesis, is in agreement with the literature since heparan sulphate proteoglycans are known to be linked to the pathogenesis of the disease39,40,41. Biosynthesis of retinol, a form of Vitamin A, was identified as a reporter pathway by RPAm, in accordance with the role of retinoids in late onset alzheimer’s disease42. The synthesis of N-acetylneuraminate, the most common sialic acid found in mammalian cells, is predicted to be affected during the disease (Table 3). Sialic acids are involved in the structure of glycosphingolipids, forming gangliosides. Gangliosides are known to be directly involved in Alzheimer’s disease contributing to the pathological conditions observed during the disease43,44. Sialic acids are also involved in the structure of O-glycans45, a related pathway of which was identified in the reporter list.

In general, RPAr gives only two pathways with p-value lower than 0.01 whereas it is 20 pathways for RPAm. PADOG, on the other hand, did not give any significantly perturbed pathway for the selected significance cut-off of 0.01. However, it identified glutathione redox reactions and reactive oxygen species degradation in the top five significant pathways (p-values of 0.02 and 0.03 respectively). These pathways did not appear in the reporter pathway analyses. It is known that reactive oxygen species are indicative of oxidative stress in the cell and neurodegenerative diseases are associated with oxidative stress46,47. The success of PADOG to capture these pathways, albeit at a lower significance level, could be attributed to its moderated t-statistics based significance algorithm.

Analysis of Up/Down Pathway Regulation

In the reporter pathway analysis, the up/down regulation of the associated gene transcripts are not distinguished. I have modified RPAm analysis such that significantly upregulated and downregulated pathways are also identified. Such an analysis can be combined with the identified significant pathways to reveal the capacity of RPAm to predict the directionality of regulation. Due to the nature of the algorithm, in the up (/down) regulation analysis only up (/down) regulated genes linked to a metabolite are used to calculate a reporter metabolite score48. Since this leads to an information loss in the network connectivity, the results of such analysis must always be complemented with the results from the original analysis, as cautioned in an earlier study48.

RPAm results for only up-regulated genes and for only down-regulated genes reveal that a high majority of the identified pathways for the genetic perturbation (Table 1) are significantly down-regulated. This is in line with the observation reported by the authors who generated the transcriptome data. They state that genes linked to NADPH-dependent reactions are commonly downregulated in the deletion strain14. For the environmental perturbation, the analysis identifies pathways for heme biosynthesis, glycolysis and zymosterol biosynthesis as upregulated in anaerobic conditions. High glycolytic pathway fluxes were reported in anaerobic conditions18. On the other hand, since zymosterol is used as a supplement in anaerobic conditions, no intracellular biosynthesis would be expected in these conditions. Such a contradiction is also available for the directionality of heme biosynthesis. The analysis identifies aerobic respiration pathways as downregulated in anaerobic condition as expected. Fatty acid oxidation pathway and the degradation of heptadecenoyl-CoA and oxtadecadienoyl-CoA are all predicted to be downregulated as reported in literature22. For the Alzheimer’s disease, the verification of the directionality predictions for the pathways is more challenging due to the molecular complexity of the perturbation. TCA Cycle was predicted to be down-regulated in the directionality analysis. However, some of the enzymes of the cycle were reported to be significantly increased in the disease whereas some others decreased while the rest showed no change. Melatonin degradation pathway was predicted to be up-regulated, in agreement with the reduced melatonin levels in the disease36. On the other hand, the calculated direction for retinol biosynthesis is upregulation whereas it is known that retinol levels diminish in Alzheimer’s disease42. In summary, the directionality-incorporated version of RPAm can correctly predict some of the pathway regulations whereas contradictory results with the literature data were also obtained.


In summary, a new metabolite-centric reporter pathway analysis was suggested as alternative to the reaction-centric approach on which a number of methods appeared recently in the literature. The power of metabolite-centric approach lies on the fact that all reactions consuming or producing the metabolites of a pathway are considered in the calculation of the pathway activity although usually such reactions are catalogued as members of other pathways and not accounted for, in the classical approach. The direct effect of such reactions on the pathway activity is obvious although this has been mainly neglected in the pathway activity calculations. The power of metabolite-centric approach was demonstrated on three different types of perturbation; a genetic perturbation in the yeast S. cerevisiae due to the deletion of GDH1 gene encoding NADPH-dependent glutamate synthesis, an environmental perturbation in the yeast due to the availability of oxygen and a disease-based perturbation due to Alzheimer’s disease. The reaction-centered analysis leads to fewer significant pathways in general compared to the metabolite-centered analysis, presenting the ability to identify the network-wide effect of perturbations of the latter. Many pathways, which were captured by RPAm and known to be directly related to the phenotype of the discussed perturbations could not be identified by RPAr. Considering the reported power of approaches which are based on network connectivity, the success of metabolite-centric pathway identification lies on the fact that it brings the consideration of the connectivity by the reaction-centric approaches to a new level.

There are, on the other hand, a few issues to be considered for the metabolite-centric scoring approach. The tendency of the approach to report noticeably more significant pathways compared to RPAr may lead to the inclusion of pathways not specific for the studied perturbation. The risk of non-specific pathways can be compensated by employing a lower cut-of for the RPAm results (eg. 0.005 rather than 0.01). A more stringent cut-off of 0.005 can still capture pathways which cannot be captured by RPAr for a significance level of 0.01. This includes myo-inositol, retinol and TCA cycle pathways for Alzheimer’s disease and pentose-phosphate, 2-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex and glycolysis pathways for the GDH1-based genetic perturbation. One should note that RPAm and RPAr results have different rankings for different pathways. That is, what RPAm does is more than merely decreasing the cut-off. For example, mevalonate pathway, ranked as 17th most significant pathway for Alzheimer’s disease based on RPAm, ranks as 41th pathway for RPAr. One reason behind the change in rankings in addition to the inclusion of inter-pathway reactions is the implicit assignment of an increased weight on branch points by RPAm. The score of a gene is accounted multiple times in the metabolite-centered scoring especially if the metabolites of the pathway are on branch points. Although this may seem a disadvantage of the approach at first sight, the increased weight is in agreement with the fact that the branch points act as important regulatory spots in metabolism49,50 and RPAm better reflects this phenomenon.


Metabolic Networks and Transcriptome Data

Metabolic networks for human and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae were downloaded from BioCyc database10 in January 2015. Human metabolic network included 2237 metabolites and 2036 unique reactions controlled by 2521 genes while the yeast metabolic network covered 861 metabolites and 851 unique reactions controlled by 693 genes. The downloaded data also include the corresponding pathway information for each reaction. The pathways with at least three associated reactions were reported in the results. In total, there are 133 pathways for human and 158 pathways for the yeast meeting this criteria. The networks were downloaded using SmartTables functionality of the BioCyc website and parsed in MATLAB 2013a for further analysis.

Three different transcriptomic datasets were analyzed: the genetic perturbation in the yeast via the deletion of NADPH-dependent GDH1 gene grown in anaerobic chemostat cultures14, the environmental perturbation from aerobic to anaerobic condition in glucose-grown chemostat cultures of the yeast17 and the disease perturbation in human brain due to Alzheimer’s disease29. The corresponding datasets were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE26927, GSE4807) or obtained from the authors.

Reporter Pathway Analysis

Reporter pathway analyses were performed using the online BIOMET Toolbox server51. Specifically, the Reporter Features tool under the online tools were used. The three input files, p-value data file, interaction network file and network nodes-data association file, were created in MATLAB in the requested format for each specific simulation. In the metabolite-centric reporter pathway analysis (RPAm), a metabolite-score must be computed first. This scoring method, termed reporter metabolite analysis, was used in a number of research covering microorganisms7,52 and health problems such as liver diseases, obesity, autism53,54,55. Different versions of the approach also appeared48,56. For the reporter metabolite analysis, the transriptome-data based p-values were calculated by using two-sample t-test via MATLAB’s ttest2 function. The metabolic networks downloaded from BioCyc include the information on reaction-gene association. In the analyses, the genes are linked to the corresponding controlled reactions at first as follows: when a reaction is associated with multiple genes, the one with the minimum p-value was considered8. Then, each metabolite in the metabolic network of interest is scored via BIOMET Toolbox server based on the neighbor genes (reactions).

Here, Zi is the Z-score of gene i obtained from the corresponding p-value by using the inverse normal cumulative distribution and k is the number of neighbor genes to the metabolite. The averaging of the mRNA-level changes in the form of Z-scores shows the average effect of perturbation on metabolites7,8. The calculated Z-scores are corrected by the toolbox for the background distribution by using the mean (μk) and standard deviation (σk) of the aggregated Z scores of many sets of randomly selected k genes from the metabolic network.

Metabolites with significant Z-scores are called reporter metabolites, hence the analysis is termed reporter metabolite analysis7. Afterwards, each pathway is scored based on the involved metabolites, which were linked to the differential transcriptome data via the reporter metabolite analysis (Fig. 1). The metabolite-centric scoring of pathways (RPAm) follows a similar equation to eqn. (1).

Figure 1

Comparison of reaction-centric and metabolite-centric reporter pathway analysis approaches.

While the change in the gene activities corresponding to reactions R4, R5, R6 and R8 are not counted in RPAr (reaction-centric reporter pathway analysis) since they are categorized under other pathways, they are considered in RPAm (metabolite-centric reporter pathway analysis) since the metabolites of the pathway are interdependent with the rates of these reactions. (Mi: metabolites, Ri: reactions, gi: genes, pi: p-values).

Here, n is the number of metabolites associated with the pathway. The output is a set of significantly affected metabolic pathways. The alternative reaction-centric reporter pathway analysis (RPAr) is directly based on the involved reactions in a pathway, which are linked to transcriptome data via the genes controlling the reactions. Pathways are scored via the p-values (Z-scores) of the genes associated with each involved reaction in this case, following Eqn. (4) and (5) (Fig. 1).

Here, Zi is the score of gene i and p is the number of reactions associated with the pathway. Note that both and scores were corrected for the background distribution as shown in Eqn. (2). A significance level of 0.01 was used as cut-off in the analysis of the results to identify reporter pathways. Benjamini-Hochberg corrected p-values for a cut-off of 0.05 roughly corresponds to the same significant pathways for RPAm. The metabolite-centric approach allows the elucidation of the global effect of the perturbation on cellular parts since this scoring considers the fact that a metabolite is consumed or produced by a number of reactions which are traditionally listed under different pathways. Such an analysis bridges different cellular processes and also reflects cross-talks between pathways.

Pathway Analysis with Down-weighting of Overlapping Genes (PADOG)

PADOG57 was used to compare the results of the RPAm and RPAr analyses. PADOG was chosen since it was shown to be one of the best performers among more than 15 alternative gene-set based algorithms4. The key point in PADOG is it down-weights the weight of a gene in a pathway if it is involved in multiple pathways, prioritizing the effect of pathway-specific genes in the scoring. Pathway scores are calculated by first calculating Bayesian-model based moderated t-scores for the genes58 and then computing the average of weighted sum of the absolute moderated t-scores of the genes in a pathway. A permutation-based test is used afterwards to assign p-values to the pathways. The related calculations were performed in the R environment, by using the PADOG package.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Çakır, T. Reporter pathway analysis from transcriptome data: Metabolite-centric versus Reaction-centric approach. Sci. Rep. 5, 14563; doi: 10.1038/srep14563 (2015).


  1. Curtis, R. K., Oresic, M. & Vidal-Puig, A. Pathways to the analysis of microarray data. Trends Biotechnol. 23, 429–435 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grosu, P., Townsend, J. P., Hartl, D. L. & Cavalieri, D. Pathway Processor: a tool for integrating whole-genome expression results into metabolic networks. Genome Res. 12, 1121–1126 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ertel, A., Verghese, A., Byers, S. W., Ochs, M. & Tozeren, A. Pathway-specific differences between tumor cell lines and normal and tumor tissue cells. Mol. Cancer 5, 55, 10.1186/1476-4598-5-55 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tarca, A. L., Bhatti, G. & Romero, R. A comparison of gene set analysis methods in terms of sensitivity, prioritization and specificity. PloS one 8, e79217, 10.1371/journal.pone.0079217 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Xie, C. et al. KOBAS 2.0: a web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic acids Res. 39, W316–W322 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mootha, V. K. et al. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat. Genet. 34, 267–273 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Patil, K. R. & Nielsen, J. Uncovering transcriptional regulation of metabolism by using metabolic network topology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States Am. 102, 2685–2689 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zelezniak, A., Pers, T. H., Soares, S., Patti, M. E. & Patil, K. R. Metabolic network topology reveals transcriptional regulatory signatures of type 2 diabetes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000729, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000729 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanehisa, M. et al. Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucleic acids Res. 42, D199–D205 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Caspi, R. et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases. Nucleic acids Res. 42, D459–D471 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Croft, D. et al. The Reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic acids Res. 42, D472–D477 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, T. Y., Sohn, S. B., Kim, Y. B., Kim, W. J. & Lee, S. Y. Recent advances in reconstruction and applications of genome-scale metabolic models. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 23, 617–623 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nissen, T. L., Kielland-Brandt, M. C., Nielsen, J. & Villadsen, J. Optimization of ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering of the ammonium assimilation. Metab. Eng. 2, 69–77 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bro, C., Regenberg, B. & Nielsen, J. Genome-wide transcriptional response of aSaccharomyces cerevisiae strain with an altered redox metabolism. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 85, 269–276, (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Villas-Bôas, S. G., Moxley, J. F., Akesson, M., Stephanopoulos, G. & Nielsen, J. High-throughput metabolic state analysis: the missing link in integrated functional genomics of yeasts. Biochem. J. 388, 669–677 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Celton, M., Goelzer, A., Camarasa, C., Fromion, V. & Dequin, S. A constraint-based model analysis of the metabolic consequences of increased NADPH oxidation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 14, 366–379 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Knijnenburg, T. A. et al. Exploiting combinatorial cultivation conditions to infer transcriptional regulation. BMC Genomic 8, 25, 10.1186/1471-2164-8-25 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Daran-Lapujade, P. et al. The fluxes through glycolytic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are predominantly regulated at posttranscriptional levels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States Am. 104, 15753–15758 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wiebe, M. G. et al. Central carbon metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic, oxygen-limited and fully aerobic steady-state conditions and following a shift to anaerobic conditions. FEMS yeast Res. 8, 140–154 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fiaux, J. et al. Metabolic-flux profiling of the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis. Eukaryot. cell 2, 170–180 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bruckmann, A. et al. Proteome analysis of aerobically and anaerobically grown Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. J. proteomics 71, 662–669 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rintala, E. et al. Transcriptional responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to shift from respiratory and respirofermentative to fully fermentative metabolism. Omics: J. Integr. Biol. 15, 461–476 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Verduyn, C., Postma, E., Scheffers, W. A. & van Dijken, J. P. Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures. J. Gen. Microbiol. 136, 395–403 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ishtar Snoek, I. S. & Yde Steensma, H. Factors involved in anaerobic growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 24, 1–10 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rintala, E. et al. Low oxygen levels as a trigger for enhancement of respiratory metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomic 10, 461, 10.1186/1471-2164-10-461 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zavrel, M., Hoot, S. J. & White, T. C. Comparison of sterol import under aerobic and anaerobic conditions in three fungal species, Candida albicans, Candida glabrata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot. cell 12, 725–738 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hickman, M. J. & Winston, F. Heme levels switch the function of Hap1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae between transcriptional activator and transcriptional repressor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 7414–7424 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Panozzo, C. et al. Aerobic and anaerobic NAD+ metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 517, 97–102 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Durrenberger, P. F. et al. Common mechanisms in neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation: a BrainNet Europe gene expression microarray study. J. Neural Transm. 122, 1055–1068 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sertbaş, M., Ulgen, K. & Cakır, T. Systematic analysis of transcription-level effects of neurodegenerative diseases on human brain metabolism by a newly reconstructed brain-specific metabolic network. FEBS open bio 4, 542–553 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stokes, C. E. & Hawthorne, J. N. Reduced Phosphoinositide Concentrations in Anterior Temporal Cortex of Alzheimer-Diseased Brains. J. Neurochem. 48, 1018–1021 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Miller, B. L. et al. Alzheimer disease: depiction of increased cerebral myo-inositol with proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology 187, 433–437 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bubber, P., Haroutunian, V., Fisch, G., Blass, J. P. & Gibson, G. E. Mitochondrial abnormalities in Alzheimer brain: Mechanistic implications. Ann. Neurol. 57, 695–703 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gibson, G. E., Sheu, K.-F. R. & Blass, J. P. Abnormalities of mitochondrial enzymes in Alzheimer disease. J. Neural Transm. 105, 855–870 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gibson, G. E., Blass, J. P., Beal, M. F. & Bunik, V. The α-ketoglutarate-dehydrogenase complex. Mol. Neurobiol. 31, 43–63 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lin, L. et al. Melatonin in Alzheimer’s disease. International J. Mol. Sci. 14, 14575–14593 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, R. Y., Zhou, J. N., van Heerikhuize, J., Hofman, M. A. & Swaab, D. F. Decreased melatonin levels in postmortem cerebrospinal fluid in relation to aging, Alzheimer’s disease and apolipoprotein E-epsilon4/4 genotype. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84, 323–327 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Martins, I. J. et al. Apolipoprotein E, cholesterol metabolism, diabetes and the convergence of risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease and cardiovascular disease. Mol. Psychiatry 11, 721–736 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Van Horssen, J., Wesseling, P., van den Heuvel, L. P. W. J., de Waal, R. M. W. & Verbeek, M. M. Heparan sulphate proteoglycans in Alzheimer’s disease and amyloid-related disorders. Lancet. Neurol. 2, 482–492 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nadanaka, S. & Kitagawa, H. Heparan sulphate biosynthesis and disease. J. Biochem. 144, 7–14 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang, G., Zhang, X., Wang, X. & Li, J.-P. Towards understanding the roles of heparan sulfate proteoglycans in Alzheimer’s disease. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 516028, 10.1155/2014/516028 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Goodman, A. B. Retinoid receptors, transporters and metabolizers as therapeutic targets in late onset Alzheimer disease. J. Cell. Physiol. 209, 598–603 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Grimm, M. O. W. et al. Amyloid precursor protein (APP) mediated regulation of ganglioside homeostasis linking Alzheimer’s disease pathology with ganglioside metabolism. PloS one 7, e34095, 10.1371/journal.pone.0034095 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Ariga, T., McDonald, M. P. & Yu, R. K. Role of ganglioside metabolism in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease-a review. J. Lipid Res. 49, 1157–1175 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schauer, R. & Varki, A. in Essentials of Glycobiology 2nd edn (eds. Varki, A. et al. ) Ch. 14, 199–217 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schulz, J. B., Lindenau, J., Seyfried, J. & Dichgans, J. Glutathione, oxidative stress and neurodegeneration. Eur. J. Biochem./FEBS 267, 4904–4911 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Barnham, K. J., Masters, C. L. & Bush, A. I. Neurodegenerative diseases and oxidative stress. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 205–214 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Oliveira, A. P., Patil, K. R. & Nielsen, J. Architecture of transcriptional regulatory circuits is knitted over the topology of bio-molecular interaction networks. BMC Syst. Biol. 2, 17, 10.1186/1752-0509-2-17 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Fischer, E. & Sauer, U. Large-scale in vivo flux analysis shows rigidity and suboptimal performance of Bacillus subtilis metabolism. Nat. Genet. 37, 636–640 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Fell, D. A. Increasing the flux in metabolic pathways: a metabolic control analysis perspective. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 58, 121–124 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Cvijovic, M. et al. BioMet Toolbox: genome-wide analysis of metabolism. Nucleic acids Res. 38, W144–W149 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Vemuri, G. N., Eiteman, M. A., McEwen, J. E., Olsson, L. & Nielsen, J. Increasing NADH oxidation reduces overflow metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States Am. 104, 2402–2407 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mutch, D. M. et al. Clément. A distinct adipose tissue gene expression response to caloric restriction predicts 6-mo weight maintenance in obese subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 94, 1399–1409 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Cicek, A. E., Roeder, K. & Ozsoyoglu, G. MIRA: mutual information-based reporter algorithm for metabolic networks. Bioinformatics 30, i175–i184 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Mardinoglu, A. et al. Genome-scale metabolic modelling of hepatocytes reveals serine deficiency in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Commun. 5, 3083, 10.1038/ncomms4083 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Çakır, T. et al. Integration of metabolome data with metabolic networks reveals reporter reactions. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2, 50, 10.1038/msb4100085 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Tarca, A. L., Draghici, S., Bhatti, G. & Romero, R. Down-weighting overlapping genes improves gene set analysis. BMC Bioinforma. 13, 136; 10.1186/1471-2105-13-136 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Smyth, G. K. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 3, 1–25, (2004).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Çakır, T. Reporter pathway analysis from transcriptome data: Metabolite-centric versus Reaction-centric approach. Sci Rep 5, 14563 (2015).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing